Download ASTR 100: Homework 1 Solutions McGaugh, Fall 2008

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup

Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup

IK Pegasi wikipedia , lookup

Comparative planetary science wikipedia , lookup

Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup

Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup

Solar System wikipedia , lookup

Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Extraterrestrial skies wikipedia , lookup

Equation of time wikipedia , lookup

Orrery wikipedia , lookup

Cosmic distance ladder wikipedia , lookup

Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup

Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Tropical year wikipedia , lookup

Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ASTR 100: Homework 1 Solutions
McGaugh, Fall 2008
1. Problem 1-15. “Our solar system is bigger than some galaxies.”
This statement makes no sense. A galaxy is composed of hundreds of billions of stars, while
our solar system is ‘just’ the stuff orbiting one star, our sun. Our solar system is a tiny part
of the Milky Way Galaxy, being much smaller than it.
2. Problem 1-41. Distance by light:
The problem asks you to compute the distance that light can travel in different intervals of
time, measured in kilometers and miles.
d = vt: distance = speed x time.
In this case, the speed is the speed of light: v = c. According to Appendix A of the book,
c = 3 × 105 km/s. The exact number is c = 299, 792 km/s; it is OK to use either value.
a) 1 light-second = (3 × 105 km/s)(1 s).
The seconds cancel out (see Appendix C), so 1 light-second = 300,000 km.
1 km = 0.62 miles, so (300,000 km)(0.62 miles/km) = 186,000 miles.
That’s a long way to go in one second!
b) Similarly, 1 light-minute = (3 × 105 km/s)(1 minute).
Be consistent in the use of units. 1 minute = 60 seconds, so
1 light-minute = (3 × 105 km/s)(60 s). Now the units again cancel nicely, and
1 light-minute = 1.8 × 107 km = 1.1 × 107 miles.
c) 1 light-hour = (3 × 105 km/s)(1 hour).
1 light-hour = (3 × 105 km/s)(60 minutes/hour)(60 seconds/minute)
1 light-hour = 1.08 × 109 km = 6.7 × 108 miles.
d) 1 light-day. There are 24 hours in a day, so
1 day = (24 hours)(60 minutes/hour)(60 seconds/minute) = 86,400 seconds.
1 light-day = (3 × 105 km/s)(86, 400 s), so
1 light-day = 2.6 × 1010 km = 1.6 × 1010 miles.
For a little perspective, the Voyager 1 spacecraft was launched 31 years ago, in 1977. It has
been traveling away from the earth ever since, and is now the most remote man-made object
at a distance of 1.6 × 1010 km. Light the sun emits today will pass Voyager tomorrow.
3. Problem 1-42. Moonlight and Sunlight:
This simply inverts the problem above: Since d = vt, t = d/v.
a) Light travel time from the moon to earth:
5
t = dmoon
c . dmoon = 3.8 × 10 km (Textbook Table E.3).
5
km
t = 3.8×10
3×105 km/s
t = 1.3 seconds.
b) Light travel time from the sun to earth:
8
t = dsun
c . dsun = 1.5 × 10 km (Table E.2).
5
/s
t = 3×10 km
1.5×108 km
t = 500 s = 8 minutes, 20 seconds.
1
4. Problem 2-24. “If the Earth’s orbit were a perfect circle, we would not have seasons.”
This statement is clearly false. A perfectly circular orbit would mean that the earth is always
the same distance from the sun. However, the primary cause of our seasons is the tilt of the
earth’s spin axis with respect to its orbital plane. Eliminating the variation in distance from
the sun would not affect this primary attribute.
5. Problem 2-28. The north celestial pole (i.e., the North Star) is at an altitude of 35◦ above
your northern horizon. This tells you that (a) you are at latitude 35◦ N.
6. Problem 2-32. If the sun rises precisely due east, (b) it must be the day of the equinox (either
spring or fall).
7. Problem 3-13. “The Yankees are the best baseball team of all time.”
On its face, this is the assertion of a partisan fan, not a scientific claim. However, can we
evaluate this claim scientifically? Is there some measure by which the Yankees (or some other
team) could be evaluated? Baseball is a statistics rich sport; there are many well-recorded
possibilities. Which team has the best overall won-lost record? Which team has won the
most pennants? Which has won the most world series? These are all questions that can be
answered clearly and quantitatively. The trick is agreeing which statistic qualifies a team
as the ‘best of all time.’ It often happens that even when we agree on the facts, we may
not agree on what they mean. Does a team qualify as the best-ever if it meets one of the
criteria above? Only if it meets all three? Or is there some other measure that would be more
appropriate? The problem returns us to the phrasing of the assertion: what do we mean by
‘best?’ If we can agree on that, and can define a quantitative way to measure it, then we can
turn this assertion into something accessible to science. Agreeing on what we mean by ‘best’
is not simple, which is why scientists prefer more specific, limited language. “The Yankees
have been the most successful franchise in winning pennants” would be a more measured (and
measurable!) statement.
8. Extra credit 2-44. The Sun’s diameter.
θ = L/D. In this case, we want to find the size of the sun (L) from its observed angular
diameter (θ = 0.5◦ ) and distance (D = dsun = 1.5 × 108 km). Hence
L = θD. This formula holds only when θ is in radians, so first convert units: 1 radian =
180/π degrees.
θ = 0.5◦ = 0.5 degrees(π/180)(radians/degree)
θ = 0.0087 radians. Now
L = (8.7 × 10−3 )(1.5 × 108 km)
L = 1.31 × 106 km, very close to the actual value of 1.39 × 106 km.
Indeed, we only miss it by a little because we have approximated the angular size of the sun
as half a degree. This is close, but not exact. We can invert the procedure to find the exact
value:
θ = L/D = (1.39 × 106 km)/(1.5 × 108 km) = 0.0093 radians = 0.53◦ .
2