* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download MODULE 5: Case Classification and Differential Diagnosis
Hepatitis C wikipedia , lookup
Herpes simplex virus wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup
Sexually transmitted infection wikipedia , lookup
2015–16 Zika virus epidemic wikipedia , lookup
Orthohantavirus wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
Yellow fever wikipedia , lookup
Typhoid fever wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Gastroenteritis wikipedia , lookup
Middle East respiratory syndrome wikipedia , lookup
West Nile fever wikipedia , lookup
Coccidioidomycosis wikipedia , lookup
Neglected tropical diseases wikipedia , lookup
Rocky Mountain spotted fever wikipedia , lookup
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Lymphocytic choriomeningitis wikipedia , lookup
MODULE 5: Case Classification and Differential Diagnosis Dengue Clinical Management Acknowledgements This curriculum was developed with technical assistance from the University of Malaya Medical Centre. Materials were contributed by the Ministry of Health, Singapore, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the University of Malaya Medical Centre. Dengue case classification by severity Dengue has a wide spectrum of clinical presentations with often unpredictable evolution: • Self-limiting disease in most patients • Severe disease in a small proportion of patients, characterized by plasma leakage with/without haemorrhage WHO proposed a dengue case classification system in 2009: • Supported by set of clinical and/or laboratory parameters • Aim to show clear-cut difference between patients with nonsevere versus severe dengue • Classification levels would help clinicians in decision making about intensity of treatment and observation Dengue case classification (2009) Dengue Without With warning signs Severe dengue • • • 1. Severe plasma leakage 2. Severe haemorrhage 3. Severe organ impairment Dengue case definition (2009) Probable dengue Live in and/or travelled to a dengue-endemic area Fever and two of the following criteria: • Nausea, vomiting (new) • Rash • Aches and pains (combined) • Tourniquet test positive • Leucopenia • Any warning sign Laboratory-confirmed dengue (Important when there is no sign of plasma leakage) Dengue case classification (2009) Dengue ± warning signs Without With warning signs Criteria for dengue ± warning signs Probable dengue Live in or travelled to dengueendemic area. Fever and two of the following criteria: • Nausea, vomiting (new) • Rash • Aches and pains (combined) • Tourniquet test positive • Leucopenia • Any warning sign Laboratory-confirmed dengue (important when no sign of plasma leakage) Warning signs* Severe dengue • • • 1. Severe plasma leakage 2. Severe haemorrhage 3. Severe organ impairment Criteria for severe dengue 1. Severe plasma leakage leading to: • Shock (DSS) • Fluid accumulation with respiratory distress Abdominal pain or tenderness • Persistent vomiting • Mucosal bleed 2. Severe bleeding • Lethargy; restlessness Bleeding that causes hemodynamic • Liver enlargement >2 cm instability and may require blood • Clinical fluid accumulation transfusion • Increase in HCT with rapid decrease in platelet count 3. Severe organ involvement • Liver: AST or ALT ≥1000 * Requiring strict observation and medical • CNS: Impaired consciousness intervention • Impaired cardiac function • Dengue mimics many clinical syndromes Flu-like illness Clues to diagnose dengue: Viral exanthem Understanding the dynamic and systemic nature of dengue Acute abdomen Infections Autoimmune diseases Haematological disorders Dengue Knowing its various manifestations as the disease progresses from febrile phase to critical phase and evolves into recovery phase Conditions that mimic the febrile phase of dengue Viral infections Influenza, measles, rubella Chikungunya, West Nile virus Enterovirus Other viral haemorrhagic fever Infectious mononucleosis Acute HIV seroconversion illness Bacterial infections Leptospirosis Typhoid Rickettsia infections (typhus, scrub typhus, etc.) Parasitic infections Malaria Febrile illness with a rash Diarrhoeal diseases Measles, rubella Infectious mononucleosis, enterovirus Chikungunya, West Nile virus, Scarlet fever, meningococcal infection Leptospirosis, typhoid Rickettsia infections (typhus, scrub typhus, etc.) Syphilis, acute HIV seroconversion illness Autoimmune diseases (e.g. SLE) Adverse drug reaction Rotavirus Salmonellosis Other enteric infections Conditions that mimic the critical phase of dengue Acute abdomen Acidotic breathing/ respiratory distress Infections Autoimmune diseases Malignancies Others Acute appendicitis Acute cholecystitis Perforated viscus Diabetic ketoacidosis Diabetic ketoacidosis Lactic acidosis Renal failure Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) Sepsis, septic shock Acute gastroenteritis Leptospirosis, typhoid, typhus, malaria Viral hepatitis Acute HIV seroconversion illness Systemic lupus erythematosus Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Systemic vascultis Acute leukaemia Lymphoma Other malignancies Liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension Adverse drug reaction Differentiating dengue from leptospirosis Causative organism Dengue Leptospirosis Dengue virus Leptospira spirochete Mosquito bites Contact with urinecontaminated water or soil (e.g. flood water, puddles) Source of infection WHO case definitions Rash Headache Retro-orbital eye pain Hemorrhagic manifestation Arthralgia Myalgia Leukopenia Rash Menigeal irritation Conjunctiva suffusion Hemorrhagic manifestation Cardiac arrhythmia or failure Cough/hemoptysis Anuria/oliguria Jaundice Definitive therapy Antibiotics (doxycycline, penicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin) Early detection of warning signs, supportive care and judicious use of IVFs Differentiating dengue from leptospirosis Clinical features Leptospirosis Dengue Fever (≥38°C)* +++ +++ Myalgia +++ +++ Headache +++ +++ Rash + ++ Jaundice ++ +/- Hyperbilirubinemia (T.Bili >1.3) ++ +/- Elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN >25) or Creatinine >2 + +/- Leukocytosis (WBC >10 000)† ++ +/- Positive tourniquet test + +++ +++ + + +++ Anaemia Thrombocytopenia *Mean frequency of symptoms from studies where the two diseases were directly compared among patient seeking care; +++ = 70%–100% of patients; ++ = 40%–69%; + = 10%–39%; +/- = <10%; - = 0%. Sources: Bruce MG et. al. Acta Tropica, 2005; Libraty DH et. al. PLoS, 2007; LaRocque RC et al. EID, 2005; Ellis T et. al. VBZD, 2008. **Leptospirosis cases may be more likely to have intermittent fever, but both infections may have biphasic fevers. † Leptospirosis cases may be more likely to have a higher percentage of neutrophils and a higher absolute neutrophil count. Differentiating dengue from malaria Clinical features P. falciparum P. vivax Dengue +++ +++ +++ + + +++ Headache +++ +++ +++ Rash +/- +/- ++ Jaundice + +/- +/- Vomiting ++ + + Abdominal pain + + +/- Hepatomegaly + + +/- Splenomegaly + + +/- Leukopenia +/- +/- +++ Anaemia ++ ++ + Thrombocytopenia ++ ++ +++ Fever (≥38°C)* Myalgia *Mean frequency of symptoms from studies where the two diseases were directly compared among patient seeking care; +++ = 70%– 100% of patients; ++ = 40%–69%; + = 10%–39%; +/- = <10%; - = 0%. Sources: Nimmannitya S et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1969; 18:954– 971. Halstead SB et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1969; 18:972–983. Beg et al. Int J Inf Dis, 2008; 12:37–42. Robinson et al. J Travel Med, 2001; 8(2):76– 81. Luxemburger et al. Tran R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 1998; 92:42-49. Differentiating dengue from chikungunya Clinical Features Chikungunya virus infection Dengue virus infection +++ ++ + ++ Arthalgias/arthritis +++ +/- Headache ++ ++ Rash ++ + Bleeding dyscrasias +/- ++ - +/- Leukopenia ++ +++ Neutropenia + +++ Lymphopenia +++ ++ + +++ Fever (>102°F) Myalgia Shock Thrombocytopenia *Mean frequency of symptoms from studies where the two diseases were directly compared among patient seeking care; +++ = 70%–100% of patients; ++ = 40%–69%; + = 10%–39%; +/- = <10%; - = 0%. Sources: Nimmannitya S et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1969; 18:954–971. Halstead SB et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1969; 18:972–983. Differentiating dengue from surgical acute abdomen Dengue-related acute abdomen Surgical acute abdomen Fever precedes pain and may become afebrile Fever may occur after onset of pain Tender but not guarded Guarded abdomen with rebound tenderness in perforated viscus May be distended in plasma leakage May or may not be distended Fluid resuscitation is imperative in severe dengue May require fluid resuscitation Pain improves with fluid resuscitation in severe dengue Pain remains after fluid resuscitation Differentiating dengue shock from septic shock Dengue shock Temperature - Occurs after defervescence - Temperature is often subnormal or normal - Temperature may be high in those with reactive haemophagocytic syndrome Septic shock - Temperature is usually high - But could be subnormal in late stage of septic shock (decompensation) Pulse - Small or weak pulse volume - Narrowed pulse pressure - Cold extremities - Bounding pulse - Widened pulse pressure with warm extremities in the early stage of septic shock Full blood count - Usually leukopenic and thrombocytopenic - Leukocytosis maybe observed in those with active bleeding - Usually leukocytosis - But could be leukopenic and/or thrombocytopenic C-reactive protein - Normal or mildly elevated CRP - Markedly elevated CRP