Download sample abstracts - Department of Physics | Oregon State

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup

Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Quantum Simulations from First Principles
Before
As pointed out by James Langer in a recent editorial of Physics Today, scientific computing is now on a par
with laboratory experiment and mathematical theory as a tool for research in science and engineering: "The
computer is literally providing a new window through which we can observe the natural world in exquisite
detail." [1]. Simulations can substitute for experiments that are impossible or impracticable. They can help
interpret experiments, thus providing virtual laboratories that complement real laboratories and
mathematical theories. Examples will illustrate quantum simulations, that is, simulations at the microscopic
level, driven by the laws of quantum mechanics. In particular, I will describe recent work on fluids and
solids under pressure (predicting structural properties); microfractures in disordered solids; dynamics and
stability of nanoparticles; conformation and dynamics of the DNA backbone. These simulations, together
with many others appeared in the literature of the last two decades, highlight the important role of
computational quantum mechanics [2] in addressing problems in condensed matter physics, materials
science and chemical physics.
[1] "Computing in Physics: are we taking it too seriously? Or not seriously enough," J. Langer, Physics
Today, July 1999.
[2] "Computational material science: the era of applied quantum mechanics," J. Bernholc, Physics Today,
September 1999.
New Heavy Fermion Materials
Before
CeRhIn5, CeIrIn5, Ce2RhIn8, and Ce2IrIn8 are members of a new family of heavy Fermion materials that are
tetragonal derivatives of CeIn3. At ambient pressure CeRhIn5 orders antiferromagnetically at T N=3.8 K out
of a state with a Sommerfeld coefficient of order 200 mJ/mol-K2. With applied pressure, the electrical
resistivity develops a peak near 30 K that initially moves to lower temperature with increasing pressure,
unlike other Ce-based materials. TN is nearly pressure independent to 15 kbar, at which point a first-order
like transition to a superconducting state with T c=2.1 K is observed. CeIrIn5 has a Sommerfeld coefficient
of order 700 mJ/mol-K2 and displays bulk superconductivity below 400 mK. The superconducting
transition sharpens and moves to higher temperature with applied pressure. Finally, Ce 2RhIn8 orders
antiferromagnetically at 2.8 K, while Ce2IrIn8 remains paramagnetic to 100 mK. The variety of these
ground states and their evolution with pressure emphasizes the role of spatial dimensionality in determining
the ground state of heavy Fermion materials.
Using Neutron diffraction for Structure of New
Inorganic Materials
Before
An account is given of the use of neutron diffraction techniques in the study of the structure of inorganic
amorphous solids, involving both steady-state and pulsed neutron sources. The quantification of amorphous
solids structures is discussed and the various types of structural model employed in the interpretation of
neutron diffraction data are outlined, using examples taken from a wide range of materials including
amorphous semiconductors, oxide, halide, chalcogenide and metallic glasses. Special emphasis is placed on
the correct procedures for the intercomparison of models and experiments and it is shown that the greatest
barrier to progress in understanding the structure of amorphous solids lies not with the diffraction data
themselves but in the development of new modeling techniques in which parameters can be varied in a
systematic way.
Terrible example: readablity index 52; 15-20 is upper
limit
The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in
relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition,
convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and
marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one
in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of
hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.