* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download sample abstracts - Department of Physics | Oregon State
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum Simulations from First Principles Before As pointed out by James Langer in a recent editorial of Physics Today, scientific computing is now on a par with laboratory experiment and mathematical theory as a tool for research in science and engineering: "The computer is literally providing a new window through which we can observe the natural world in exquisite detail." [1]. Simulations can substitute for experiments that are impossible or impracticable. They can help interpret experiments, thus providing virtual laboratories that complement real laboratories and mathematical theories. Examples will illustrate quantum simulations, that is, simulations at the microscopic level, driven by the laws of quantum mechanics. In particular, I will describe recent work on fluids and solids under pressure (predicting structural properties); microfractures in disordered solids; dynamics and stability of nanoparticles; conformation and dynamics of the DNA backbone. These simulations, together with many others appeared in the literature of the last two decades, highlight the important role of computational quantum mechanics [2] in addressing problems in condensed matter physics, materials science and chemical physics. [1] "Computing in Physics: are we taking it too seriously? Or not seriously enough," J. Langer, Physics Today, July 1999. [2] "Computational material science: the era of applied quantum mechanics," J. Bernholc, Physics Today, September 1999. New Heavy Fermion Materials Before CeRhIn5, CeIrIn5, Ce2RhIn8, and Ce2IrIn8 are members of a new family of heavy Fermion materials that are tetragonal derivatives of CeIn3. At ambient pressure CeRhIn5 orders antiferromagnetically at T N=3.8 K out of a state with a Sommerfeld coefficient of order 200 mJ/mol-K2. With applied pressure, the electrical resistivity develops a peak near 30 K that initially moves to lower temperature with increasing pressure, unlike other Ce-based materials. TN is nearly pressure independent to 15 kbar, at which point a first-order like transition to a superconducting state with T c=2.1 K is observed. CeIrIn5 has a Sommerfeld coefficient of order 700 mJ/mol-K2 and displays bulk superconductivity below 400 mK. The superconducting transition sharpens and moves to higher temperature with applied pressure. Finally, Ce 2RhIn8 orders antiferromagnetically at 2.8 K, while Ce2IrIn8 remains paramagnetic to 100 mK. The variety of these ground states and their evolution with pressure emphasizes the role of spatial dimensionality in determining the ground state of heavy Fermion materials. Using Neutron diffraction for Structure of New Inorganic Materials Before An account is given of the use of neutron diffraction techniques in the study of the structure of inorganic amorphous solids, involving both steady-state and pulsed neutron sources. The quantification of amorphous solids structures is discussed and the various types of structural model employed in the interpretation of neutron diffraction data are outlined, using examples taken from a wide range of materials including amorphous semiconductors, oxide, halide, chalcogenide and metallic glasses. Special emphasis is placed on the correct procedures for the intercomparison of models and experiments and it is shown that the greatest barrier to progress in understanding the structure of amorphous solids lies not with the diffraction data themselves but in the development of new modeling techniques in which parameters can be varied in a systematic way. Terrible example: readablity index 52; 15-20 is upper limit The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.