Download Appendix M: DAGMAR – Sim lation Simulation Program

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Product planning wikipedia , lookup

Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup

Street marketing wikipedia , lookup

Consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup

Global marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup

Green marketing wikipedia , lookup

Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup

Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup

Advertising wikipedia , lookup

Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup

Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup

Online advertising wikipedia , lookup

Advertising management wikipedia , lookup

Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup

Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup

Business model wikipedia , lookup

Targeted advertising wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Appendix M:
DAGMAR –
Sim lation
Simulation
Program
Inception of DAGMAR Model
• Founded in 1961 with Russell
Colley’s book, Defining
Advertising Goals for
Measured Advertising Results
Avi Shankar. “Advertising’s Imbroglio.” Journal of Marketing Communications 5 1-15 1999
Simulation Programs:
Example: DAGMAR
• Like other models at the time
(AIDA—attention, interest, desire,
action), the DAGMAR Model was
based on the cognitive responses
of consumers and the sequence of
psychological processes they
would undergo to purchase a
product
Avi Shankar. “Advertising’s Imbroglio.” Journal of Marketing Communications 5 1-15 1999
1
• Sequence: Unawareness,
awareness,
comprehension,
conviction,
i ti andd action
ti
Avi Shankar. “Advertising’s Imbroglio.” Journal of Marketing Communications 5 1-15 1999
• Furthermore, when the process
by which consumers decide to
carry out a purchase is difficult
to pin, this complicates how
much money should be spent
in a specific advertising
strategy.
P. Doyle and I. Fenwick, “Measuring Advertising Payoff”. Operational Research Quarterly. Vol. 26,
pp 694 (1975)
Elaboration on DAGMAR
weaknesses
• The “Hierarchy of Response”
weakness is that the model
assumes a standard approach by
which consumers will go about
choosing what to buy.
P. Doyle and I. Fenwick, “Measuring Advertising Payoff”. Operational Research Quarterly. Vol. 26,
pp 694 (1975)
Other Academic Models
• Use of Time Series or CrossSectional Data to postulate
sales response function
P. Doyle and I. Fenwick, “Measuring Advertising Payoff”. Operational Research Quarterly. Vol. 26,
pp 695 (1975)
2
Difficulties with DAGMAR
–“’Sonking’—the scientification
of non-knowledge” (695)
–This is because most
mathematical
th
ti l models
d l have
h
nebulous empirical input
P. Doyle and I. Fenwick, “Measuring Advertising Payoff”. Operational Research Quarterly. Vol. 26,
pp 695 (1975)
• Change in attitudes of
consumers does not induce
change in purchasing behavior.
behavior
George E. Belch & Michael A. Belch, “Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications
Perspective,” Fourth Edition, 1998, Irwin/McGraw-Hill
• The model does not always
identify the means by which
people associate with the
commodity (“Response
Hierarchy Problems”)
George E. Belch & Michael A. Belch, “Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications
Perspective,” Fourth Edition, 1998, Irwin/McGraw-Hill
DAGMAR Model
• Introduced in order to set goals
on communication
• Advertising planning becomes
more effective
ff ti
• Assumption that customers go
through several stages before
buying a product
Source: Setting Promotional Goals: A Communications’ Relationship
Model, Journal of Consumer Marketing 1994
3
DAGMAR Model
• Goals specified by
– Target market
– Consumer base-line
hierarchy levels
– Changes from these baselines
– Time Period for achievement
Source: Setting Promotional Goals: A Communications’ Relationship
Model, Journal of Consumer Marketing 1994
DAGMAR Model
• Furthermore fixed stages that
customers go through, is not
realistic
• Consumers also can take
“action” without other stages
Source: Setting Promotional Goals: A Communications’ Relationship
Model, Journal of Consumer Marketing 1994
DAGMAR Model
• Problem that these
requirements/goals are complex
and time-consuming, as a lot of
research
h iis involved
i
l d
• Second problem that model
needs “preconceived notion of
consumers’ hierarchy levels”
Source: Setting Promotional Goals: A Communications’ Relationship
Model, Journal of Consumer Marketing 1994
DAGMAR - Assumption
1) Advertisement must get attention
2) Consumer mentally consciously
processes ad
3) Based on rational consumers
has to be convinced
4) Consumer is convinced, switches
to brand and buys product
Source: Pre-testing and monitoring the effectiveness
of magazine advertising, Consterdine
4
DAGMAR Model
• Agreement today that
promotion works different
depending on product and
situation
Source: Pre-testing and monitoring the effectiveness
of magazine advertising, Consterdine
DAGMAR Model
• Before setting a goal, it is
necessary to conduct research
in order to have a clear
picture of the status-quo
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
DAGMAR Model
• Defining the advertising goal
• Different to marketing goal, ads
are more related to
communication
• Goal in order to measure it
afterwards
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
DAGMAR Model
• Example of a defined goal
• “To increase –from 10% to 40% in one
year – among the 70 million
homemakers who use automatic
washers, the number who identify Brand
“X” with ingredient “Y” as a lowsudsing detergent which cleans better
and faster than others.”
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
5
DAGMAR Model
• 2nd Example of a defined goal
• “To increase the number who
get the message – “reduces
overall drilling cost” – from
25% to 50% in the next year.”
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
DAGMAR Model
3) “Goals are agreed upon by
those concerned at both creative
andd approvall levels.”
l l ”
4) These goals are based on
insights into markets and buyers
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
DAGMAR Model
• 6 steps to define goal by ANA
(Association of National Advertisers )
1) Advertising goals are concise and
succinct and only part of the marketing
2) These goals are written down in
measurable terms
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
DAGMAR Model
5) “Benchmarks are set up against
which accomplishments can be
measured.”
6) Evaluation methods are
determined before the
advertising campaign is
launched
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
6
DAGMAR Model
• Furthermore:
• Goals should be agreed upon
by advertiser and agency
before the launch of the
campaign
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
DAGMAR Model
• Getting information about
• “How many more people are
more acutely aware of the brand”
• “How many more people
comprehend the features,
advantages and benefits of the
products/service”
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
DAGMAR Model
• 2nd part MAR: Measured
Advertising Results
• “systematic evaluation of the
degree to which the advertising
succeeded in accomplishing
predetermined advertising
goals”
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
DAGMAR Model
• Getting information about
• “How many more people are
favorably disposed toward the
purchase of the product/service”
• “How many people have taken
action
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
7
DAGMAR Model
• Ultimate goal is that consumer
buy product
• DAGMAR uses 4 phases
awareness, comprehension,
h i
conviction and action
• Each stage has a probability of
purchase
Source: DAGMAR, Association of National Advertisers 1995
8