* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Nielsen`s presentation - Television Bureau of Canada
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Nielsen Lessons for Effective Advertising Presented to: CARF March 6th, 2008 Summer Vallillee, Client Consultant Jessica Avery, Client Consultant Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Pressure on Canadian Manufacturers • IfCanadian American trends can predict Canadian trends, we can Dollar increasing in value Rising commodity prices Prices Surge to RecordinHigh” Associated Press, Dec ’07 –“Wheat Manufacturer Implications: expect to see a decline Advertising spending when the “Rising Dairydeclines Prices Signal Globalization – Retailers demand lower prices ” Business Week, Sept ’07 economy Increased scrutiny Canadian “Oil –Prices Nudges to NewtoHistoric Highmarketing ” Associatedexpenses Press, Mar ’08 – Consumer Implications: – Consumers are taking notice of US vs Can pricing Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 2 Agenda Given pressure on marketing expenses, it is imperative to invest efficiently. A review of the following will shed light on the long-term effects of reducing TV spend and how to make your advertising dollars work more efficiently • • • • Long-Term implications of cutting TV Spend Targeting your consumer more efficiently Effectively matching the quantity of spending with concept Efficiently matching vehicle with concept Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 3 Trade ROI is usually better than TV in the short term, but what are the long term implications of cutting TV? Long-Term ROI – TV vs Trade Short-term ROI by Vehicle 125 Yr 1 Yr 2 107 80 85 Print TV Coupon Yr 3 Cum 3 Year Effect 2 X More! TV Trade Trade is more attractive in the immediate future Trade Effects of TV continue to support base growth 3 years down the road Lesson Learned: ROI of TV doubles after 3 years resulting in cumulative ROI higher than Trade Source: Nielsen Analytic Consulting; Lessons Learned from Marketing Mix Analyses, 2006 Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 4 With a $10M Marketing budget, how would profit growth differ with variations in Trade and TV spending? Case Study: Scenario 1 – Brand A spends $5M TV and $5M on Trade Scenario 2 – Brand A cuts TV spending and puts $10M in Trade Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Total Profit +18% Profit 14.75 16,000,000 12.5 Profits 12,000,000 12.5 10.5 8,000,000 4,000,000 2.55 1.7 0 0 0 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Lesson Learned: Investing in TV in addition to other vehicles, such as Trade, will derive better profitability in the long-term Source: Nielsen Analytic Consulting; Lessons Learned from Marketing Mix Analyses, 2006 Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 5 Efficient Targeting Unique deliverable of the Consumer Marketing Mix is understanding of ROI at the Consumer Group Level Multiplying the Consumption Index byisolation the Response Index gives usthe an$ROI Looking the Consumption Index in can be misleading… Layering the Response the we canROI see that the advertising Lastly, weaton can compare thistoto themedium, Average Hhlds to see what Index byderived Consumer Group. This fact quantifies return for targeting each actually higher responses from Younger Adults without Children In the case of Brand A, TV was skewed towardsthe Smaller Families with Kids potential is for each Consumer Group consumer group Television Television Advertising Advertising Television Advertising Response/ROI Response/ROI Summary Summary Response/ROI Summary Spectra Spectra BehaviourStage BehaviourStage Spectra BehaviourStage Lifestages Lifestages ––– Brand Brand A A Lifestages Brand A Without Without Children Children Children With Children With Startup StartupFamilies Families Startup Families Small SmallScale ScaleFamilies Families Small Scale Families Younger YoungerBustling BustlingFamilies Families Younger Bustling Families Older OlderBustling BustlingFamilies Families Older Bustling Families Young YoungTransitionals Transitionals Young Transitionals Independent IndependentSingles Singles Independent Singles Senior SeniorSingles Singles Senior Singles Established EstablishedCouples Couples Established Couples Empty EmptyNest NestCouples Couples Empty Nest Couples Senior SeniorCouples Couples Senior Couples Average AverageHousehold Household Average Household Confidential & Proprietary Consumption Consumption Consumption Index Index Index Response Response Response Index Index Index ROI ROI ROI Index Index Index TV TVAdvertising Advertising TV Advertising ROI ROIPotential Potential ROI Potential 136 136 136 125 125 125 113 113 113 97 97 97 118 118 118 115 115 115 78 78 78 98 98 98 82 82 82 76 76 76 100 100 100 72 72 72 68 68 68 45 45 45 22 22 22 157 157 157 168 168 168 11 11 11 134 134 134 64 64 64 39 39 39 100 100 100 98 98 98 85 85 85 51 51 51 21 21 21 185 185 185 193 193 193 999 131 131 131 52 52 52 30 30 30 100 100 100 $1.38 $1.38 $1.38 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $0.72 $0.72 $0.72 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $2.61 $2.61 $2.61 $2.72 $2.72 $2.72 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $0.74 $0.74 $0.74 $0.42 $0.42 $0.42 $1.41 $1.41 $1.41 Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 7 Determine which Consumer Groups are most efficient to target based on the Consumption and ROI Index Change Tactic HIGH Invest! Optimize ROI Startup Families Young Transitionals Small Scale Families Independent Singles Young Bustling Families Avg ROI: $2.67 Avg ROI: $1.10 Target Marketing Strategy Matrix: Brand A Older Bustling Families Senior Singles Empty Nest Couples Senior Couples Established Couples Avg ROI: $1.85 Avg ROI: $0.39 Forget It LOW LOW Confidential & Proprietary Invest? Opportunity Responsiveness Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company HIGH Page 8 Target the “Invest! Optimize ROI” consumer groups by understanding their media and lifestyle habits Determine How To Reach Them Current Media Dateline NBC Law and Order 60 Minutes Grey's Anatomy Lost Hockey Night in Canada Current Target Index 135 129 127 125 119 117 Recommended Media Prison Break Family Guy Simpsons 24 House CSI Current Target Index 105 69 76 99 92 102 Confidential & Proprietary High ROI! Optimize Target 95 86 105 72 107 110 High ROI! Optimize Target 137 131 128 125 115 112 Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Consumer habits/interests are linked to each of the Consumer Groups via PMB Data Source: Nielsen Spectra / Print Measurement Page 9 Skewing the TV advertising towards the Invest! Optimize consumer group will drive greater ROI Invest! Optimize ROI All Other Total ROI Current Avg ROI $2.67 $0.84 Old Old Media Media New New Media Media Viewership Viewership Viewership Viewership 31% 31% 39% 39% 69% 69% 61% 61% $1.41 $1.41 $1.55 $1.55 +10% ROI Lesson Learned: When every Marketing Dollar counts, it is imperative to understand the ROI Index and Viewing preferences of your target consumers in order optimize ROI Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 10 Efficient Quantity The match of advertising spend with the quality of the idea maximizes return. Portfolio Management Product One: Weak Scenario 1 $5MM Product Two: Average $5MM Product Three: Strong $5MM Total Spend Portfolio ROI Confidential & Proprietary $15MM $0.40 Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 12 The match of advertising spend with the quality of the idea maximizes return. Portfolio Management Scenario 1 $5MM Scenario 2 $0 Product Two: Average $5MM $5MM Product Three: Strong $5MM $10MM $15MM $0.40 $15MM $0.50 Product One: Weak Total Spend Portfolio ROI Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 13 Traditional TV advertising remains the #1 way consumers become aware of products outside of store. Source: BASES Sources of New Product Awareness Tracking - Canada Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 14 The more sources of awareness – the stronger the persuasion • Even in a potential time of recession, it remains important to reach consumers through a variety of means. Purchase interest by number of sources of awareness (indexed to total) One source only Two sources Three sources Four or more sources 0.5 1.0 1.5 Note: Some of this effect may be due to self-selection – consumers who are primary targets for the proposition or have a clear need for the product may also be more receptive to marketing. Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 15 Efficient Vehicles Consumer Metrics can help guide the optimal media mix for generating awareness Communication Effectively convey your distinct consumer proposition Simple Message Understandability through simplicity of message is critical to successful communication Focused Message Consumer takeaway is maximized with a limited number of messages in an uncluttered communication Credibility Given interest in your benefits, consumers evaluate whether they believe you will deliver Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 17 The risk of using the inappropriate media type for a complex message is large. Complex Message Simple Message 120 100 100 95 Persuasion Index 100 80 62 60 40 20 0 Persuasion with TV Ad Confidential & Proprietary Persuasion via Billboard Persuasion with TV Ad Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Persuasion via Billboard Page 18 Understandable Message Simple Do you think that this idea is a simple idea or a complicated idea? Top Fifth versus Database 29 51 Complicated 19 4.1 Extremely Simple Very Complicated Very Simple Extremely Complicated Neither Simple Nor Complicated Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 19 • Focused Message Convey the key message you intend to impart with support, and no clutter Focused How well do you think the description of this product is focused on a main point? Bottom Fifth versus Database 23 Unfocused 56 Sample Beverage Headline: The great tasting, nutritious drink that keeps your children mentally sharp and physically active 18 2.9 Extremely Focused Slightly Focused Very Focused Not at all Focused Somewhat Focused Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 20 Credibility • Additionally, consumers have to believe the claims being made – and the type of media pursued is key to communicating the credibility of the initiative Scrubbing Bubbles Automatic Shower Cleaner How do you feel about the believability of the statements made about this product? Middle Fifth versus Database 32 41 20 6 Completely Believable Somewhat Believable Neither Believable nor Unbelievable Somewhat Unbelievable Completely Unbelievable Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 21 When credibility is an issue, TV ads with their ability to show demos are the most compelling mean of communication. • Small brands especially need to use the appropriate media vehicles to convince consumers their message is credible. Influence on Purchase TV Ad Friend or Family told You Demos/Samples Magazine Ad Coupons Read about it in a magazine or newspaper Internet Source: BASES Sources of New Product Awareness Tracking - Canada Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 22 The simplicity and credibility profile should define the optimal media type(s). High Billboard Internet Banner Ads Longer TV Ads At-Shelf Communication Credibility Print On Package Communication Television Re-evaluate copy and messaging Demos Samples Low High Simplicity/Focused Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 23 Lessons Learned • With pressures to maximize advertising efficiency, consider the following efficiency measures: – Don’t jump to cut your media spending – it pays off in the long term! –If you’re a small brand, it’s also a great time to get aggressive. – Understand response by consumer group as well as consumption by consumer group to maximize ROI – Spend to the quality of the idea – Consider the simplicity, focus, and credibility of the message; the consumer measures can guide use of media types with the best ROI Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 24 Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2007 The Nielsen Company Page 25