Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Group Deal 1 Learning Theories Learning theories developed as a result of scientific speculation of learning with a hypothesized rationale. Overtime, learning theories have moved from educated hypotheses to more scientific anatomical view. Six learning theories including behaviorism, cognitivism, social cognitivism, humanism, constructivism, and brain-based learning are discussed below. Behaviorism Beginning in the late 19th century, scientists began looking at changing basic behavior. Behavioral theories defined learning as a change in the method or frequency of a behavior due to some interaction with the outer environment. Pavlov, Thorndike, and Skinner’s “ work focused on learning as behavior change developed through external conditioning and reinforcement” (Oermann, 2015, p. 17). Pavlov worked with classical conditioning by presenting a dog with meat, which resulted in the dog salivating; simultaneously, a metronome ticked in the background. Over time, this process resulted in the dog becoming conditioned to the metronome and began to salivate upon hearing it click, even when meat wasn’t presented. Classical conditioning is a process in which an unconditioned stimulus brings about an unconditioned response (Oermann, 2015, p. 17). Edward Thorndike is known for his work on learning, individual differences, intelligence, and transfer of knowledge. Consequently, he developed psychological connectionism. He hypothesized that learning is the formulation of connections between sensory stimuli and neural impulses that are identified through behavior. He also thought that learning often occurred through the process of trial and error (Oermann, 2015, p. 17). B.F. Skinner postulated the theory of operant conditioning. Skinner believed that the best way to understand behavior was to examine the causes of an action and its consequences, which Group Deal 1 he termed operant conditioning. Operant conditioning is changing behavior by using reinforcement that follows the desired response. There are two types of reinforcement. Positive reinforcement focuses on strengthening a behavior by providing a consequence an individual finds rewarding. The removal of an unpleasant reinforce can also strengthen behavior. Negative reinforcement focuses on strengthening behavior because it stops or removes an unpleasant experience. Punishment inhibits behavior and is the opposite of reinforcement, as it is designed to eliminate a response (Oermann, 2015, p. 17). Many critics argue that behaviorism is a one-dimensional approach to understanding human behavior and that they do not account for free will and internal influences such as moods, thoughts, and feelings. Behaviorism does not account for other types of learning especially learning that occurs without the use of reinforcement. People and animals are able to adapt their behavior when new information is introduced, even if a previous behavior pattern has been established through reinforcement. Behaviorism is based upon observable behaviors, so it is easier to quantify and collect data and information when conducting research (About, n.d). Cognitivism & Social Cognitivism Cognitive theory concentrates on the internal processing and connections that take place during learning; there are many contributors to this theory including Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. The cognitive approach focuses on making knowledge meaningful and helping learners organize and relate information to prior knowledge in memory (Yilmaz, 2011). There are multiple aspects of the cognitivism theory. This learning process uses instruction, organizing, and storing of information obtained. Social cognitivism is an expansion of cognitivism that includes social-cultural cognition (Oermann, 2015, p. 18). A positive implication of the in teaching is that this teaching method allows teaching to be tailored to the needs, interests, and Group Deal 1 backgrounds of the students (Yilmaz, 2011). This method enhances the learning process for both student and teacher. This teaching method emphasizes on the active involvement of the learner in the learning process, which is imperative in nursing education. A negative implication in teaching is the teacher would be expected to provide a rich classroom experience that would foster a child’s spontaneous exploration (Yilmaz, 2011). Using this theory in teaching also requires the teacher to have multiple instructional options available to learners and alter the teaching methods according to the learner’s characteristics. With the nursing educator shortage, teachers may have not have ability to specialize teaching plans for each student. Humanism Humanistic theory combines both cognitive and affective learning (Oermann, 2015). It surfaced in the 1960s with emphasis on goal attainment, “human freedom, dignity, and potential” (Huitt, 2009). Humanism is holistic and believes that behaviors change as people grow and develop over a lifetime. The individual is the catalyst for the degree of motivation and for the degree of goal attainment (Huitt, 2009). Two well know humanists are Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory postulates that actions are dependent on a five-tier hierarchy of human need. The first four tiers are called deprivation needs and must be met before self-actualization, the final tier of reaching one’s potential, can be achieved. The prerequisites to self-actualization are, in order of attainment, physiological needs, safety needs, belongingness, and esteem (Oermann, 2015). Carl Rogers agreed with Maslow adding that for continued growth people “need an environment that provides genuineness, acceptance, and empathy” (Oermann, 2015). In his article, Huitt (2009) says there are five objectives in the humanistic view to education: promoting self-direction and independence; developing accountability for learning; developing creativity; promoting curiosity; and maintaining an Group Deal 1 interest in the arts. Humanistic teaching methods include participation projects and discovery methods (Oermann, 2015). Carl Roger’s, Facilitative Teaching, also incorporates: response to feelings; praise; discussion and dialogue; and smiling (Huitt, 2015). Critics of the humanism theory point to Maslow and the “vagueness of what is considered a deficiency” (Huitt, 2015) stating that these deprivation needs are not universal. “It has been observed that an individual may permanently lose the higher wants in the hierarchy under special conditions” (Maslow, 1943, p. 394) “for example, some people often risk their own safety to rescue others from danger” (Huitt, 2015). On the other hand, Huitt (2015) cites Aspy and Roebuck (1977) who found that students with facilitative teachers: miss less school; have increased scores on selfawareness tests; have greater gains in academic achievements; have fewer discipline issues; and have higher thinking abilities (Huitt, 2015). Constructivism Constructivism theory, influenced by the work of Dewey and Vygotsky, encourages learners to build their own body of knowledge based on individual experience and to apply this knowledge directly to their environment. The constructivist’s perspective indicates that the educator plays the role of facilitator, while the learner’s role is one of constructing reality through interactions with the environment. Constructivism espouses students are to: be active in the learning environment; develop social and interpersonal skills; enjoy learning; have an understanding of the content being taught; and learn to think in an efficient manner. According to constructivism theory, nurse educators have an essential role in facilitating an environment suitable for problem-solving activities and the social process of learning. Three factors of importance for creating an effective teaching–learning environment are: (1) enhancing active learning (2) facilitating social interaction and (3) creating quality-learning materials. The Group Deal 1 strength of the cognitive theory is by having students coming to the knowledge how to think, it enhances students’ decision-making with real-world issues, and facilitates the development of social and interpersonal skills (Kala, Isaramalai & Pothang, 2010). Currently the educational environment emphasizes the need for student-centered learning; constructivism is a theoretical foundation that supports a transforming from teacher-centered to a learner-centered environment (Kala et al., 2010). Weakness: The learner learns a way to accomplish a specific task but it may not necessarily be the best way and the learning process might take longer than a rigid term/course allows. Brain-Based Learning Brain-based learning has vastly changed and developed with a plethora of knowledge taking route within the last 20 years. “Brain-based learning is the active engagement of purposeful strategies based on principles derived from an understanding of the brain” (Oermann, 2015, p. 20). Essentially, it is exactly as it sounds: learning based on our knowledge of the brain. Learning changes our brain by increasing the density of cellular material through an intricate process of signaling cortical neurons; the density changes are noted only in the areas of the brain that are stimulated (Oermann, 2015, p. 20). There are several different teaching strategies that are based around concepts of brain-based learning. A few strategies include pre-exposing learners to material a week before teaching it, teaching less content in deeper depth, providing frequent and nonjudgmental feedback during class, empowering students and providing a safe environment for risk taking (Oermann, 2015, p. 21). The strengths of this theory revolve around the fact that researchers can see how people learn and watch brain activity as learning happens. By doing this, they can cut out ineffective methods simply by watching brain activity. A weakness in this learning theory is that individuals are different in many ways, including their Group Deal 1 learning methods; this theory could lead to more standardized teaching methods. Findings and Application to Education As the previous discussion suggests, the theories vary vastly and focus on different topics. In Behaviorism learners are passive, responding to stimuli, while in cognitivism learners process, store and retrieve information, creating a knowledge set. Constructivist and humanist learning approach is more learner-centered than in Behaviorism and Cognitivism. Dr. David Kolb presented another framework that is widely used in nursing education and is worth mentioning (Lisko & O’Dell, 2010). Dr. Kolb views learning as a process and attempts to meet the needs of all learning styles. His influence, in nursing education, is highlighted by the use of moderate-fidelity manikins (Lisko & O’Dell, 2010). Educators should be aware of all theories and implement them based on the needs of each student. Different theories have their own strengths and weaknesses. Instructional strategies should be based on desired learning outcome and learners' prior knowledge, experience and interests. When teaching basic nursing procedures direct instructions may be more efficient than social-constructive approaches, but when the learning objective is to have nursing students analyze, interpret and apply information, constructivist approaches are more appropriate. Group Deal 1 References: About (n.d.). What is behaviorism? Retrieved June 13, 2014, from http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/f/behaviorism.htm Huitt, W. (2009). Humanism and open education. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from: http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/affect/humed.html Kala, S., Isaramalai, S., & Pohthong, A. (2010). Electronic learning and constructivism: A model for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 3061-66. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.002 Learning Theories Website (2014). Summaries of learning theories and models. Retrieved from: http://www.learning-theories.com/humanism.html Lisko, S. A. and O’Dell, V. (2010). Integration of theory and practice: Experiential learning theory and nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 19(1), p. 88-104. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, p. 370-396. Oermann, Marilyn. (2015). Teaching in Nursing and Role of the Educator. Springer Publishing Company. New York, NY. Yilmaz, K. (2011). The Cognitive Perspective on Learning: Its Theoretical Underpinnings and Implications for Classroom Practices. Clearing House, 84(5), 204. doi:10.1080/00098655.2011.568989