Download HOW SHOULD COMPANIES INTERACT IN BUSINESS NETWORKS?

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
HOW SHOULD COMPANIES
INTERACT IN BUSINESS
NETWORKS?
Håkan Håkansson & David Ford (2002)
Justine BILLET – Clara FAIVRE – Axel FENEAUX – Cassandre GERON –
Marguerite GUIBOURG – Alix LUTON
NETWORKS
A
O Nodes and threads
Relationship

B
Nodes = Business Units
 Threads = Relationships
BUSINESS NETWORKS
BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP
O Uniqueness
O Investment
O Influence inside the
company
BUSINESS NETWORKS
BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP
Supplier
Customer
A
B
C
Supplier
B
C
Customer
A
Supplier
-
Distributor
A
B
C
MANAGERIAL QUESTIONS ABOUT
RELATIONSHIPS AND NETWORKS
What kind of special opportunities and restrictions
does a network bring to a company?
What is the interplay between influencing others
and being influenced by them?
How can a company control a network and what
are the effects on the network and on the
company?
FIRST PARADOX
Opportunities and limitations
in a networks
Own
resources
Network
Network
position
Resources enable to offer innovative product and service features to
end-users.
O
Network position is affiliated to investment in the current structure and
ways of thinking.
O
 Already established network positions restrict the company’s ability to
react new concepts/innovations.
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS OF
THE FIRST PARADOX
O Action in more difficult but more important in
the network as it requires a change in the
structure.
O Managing the network’s expectations,
convincing.
O New relationship ?
SECOND PARADOX
Influencing and being influenced
in a network
Outcomes of strategies and
actions
Company
Relationships
Outcomes of those relationships and
what happened in them
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS OF
THE SECOND PARADOX
O Strategizing
O Extend of effects on
network
O Commitment
O Individual managers
THIRD PARADOX
Controlling and being out of control
in networks
O Need of power in a business network
O But need of balance to let the relationship
grow
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS OF
THE THIRD PARADOX
O Need to manage IN the network
O Need of analysis of resources
O Complexity
VIRAL MARKETING
IN B2B NETWORKS
Company
reputation
B2B
Partnerships
Network
Share of
ideas
FIRST PARADOX AND VIRAL
MARKETING
O
Companies do not act, they interact
O
Interactions = base of viral marketing
O
Need to work on those
interactions
FIRST PARADOX AND VIRAL
MARKETING
SECOND PARADOX AND VIRAL
MARKETING
O Influence / be influenced
O Interdependence / Co-dependence
O Acting & Interacting
 Conversations (Acting)
 Connections (Interacting)
 Results
THIRD PARADOX AND VIRAL
MARKETING
O Risk of being over controlling
 Potential partners will be aware of the
situation thanks to the word-of-mouth.
THIRD PARADOX AND VIRAL
MARKETING
O Risk of letting all the power to the other
party of the network
 Risk of attracting sharks.
CONCLUSION