* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 2.6 B-C How Supply Side Policies work
Washington Consensus wikipedia , lookup
Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup
Welfare capitalism wikipedia , lookup
Full employment wikipedia , lookup
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Transformation in economics wikipedia , lookup
Protectionism wikipedia , lookup
2.6 B-C How Supply Side Policies work Based upon pages 215-217 For Growth and therefore solving mainly Disequilibrium Unemployment Supply side policies aim for long run growth Demand Side Policies can’t improve growth beyond Yf. Price Level LRAS1980 LRAS1990 LRAS2000 And low inflation In the longrun, only improved resources, technology and market reforms increase AS P2000 P1980 P1990 AD2000 AD1980 0 Y1980 Y1990 Y2000 This will lead to both real growth in output AD1990 Quantity of Output Basics of Supply Side Policy A1:Labour Market & Welfare Reform Reduce union power / worker rights Reduce minimum wages /welfare benefits A2: Tax and Compliance Reform Reduce income taxes / corporate taxes Tax breaks for investment (including sharemarket) Reduce compliance costs – e.g. RMA B1:Education and Training Provides incentives for investing in “human capital” Improve quality and delivery of training B2: Incentives for improvements in technology Tax breaks, research grants, sharing information Read text pages 186-190 and take notes on 2 types of government policies: A: Market policies: explain 2 real world examples B: Interventionist policies: explain 2 real world examples Learning Outcomes Part 1 re: Interventionist S-side Policies Explain how will raise the levels of human capital and have a short-term impact on aggregate demand, but more importantly will increase LRAS targeting specific industries through policies including tax cuts, tax allowances and subsidized lending that promotes growth in key areas of the economy investment in education and training research and development increased and improved infrastructure Interventionist Solutions for: Solutions for Structural Unemployment : The government can either provide or subsidise retraining programs or apprenticeships, etc. For example: A long-term solution involves an education system that trains people to be more occupationally flexible. Solutions for: Frictional unemployment The government can either provide or subsidise Job search services public provision e.g. WINZ private “employment assistance" firms (e.g. Seek) Solutions for: Seasonal unemployment (as for Structural) The government can either provide or subsidise retraining programs If jobs exist in other parts of the country, a government might provide subsidies or tax breaks to encourage people to move to those areas. Learning Outcomes Part 2 re: for Market Based S-side Policies Explain how factors including deregulation, privatization, trade liberalization and anti-monopoly regulation are used to encourage competition. Explain how factors including reducing the power of labour unions, reducing unemployment benefits and abolishing minimum wages are used to make the labour market more flexible (more responsive to supply and demand). Explain how factors including personal income tax cuts are used to increase the incentive to work, and how cuts in business tax and capital gains tax are used to increase the incentive to invest. Market Solutions (Market Deregulation) Overall goal: reduce unemployment by removing obstacles (less interference) in the labour market – reducing either the “voluntary unemployment” gap or the “involuntary” gap Task: Illustrate and Give a reason for each below [hint: Either shift the ADL or the ASL to the right] Lower employee costs: (Minimum wage, maximum hours, minimum holidays, holiday & overtime pay, Kiwi-saver payments) Decreasing worker rights & protections Lower unemployment (welfare) benefits lower unemployment benefits to encourage unemployed workers to take the jobs that are available, rather then allow then the chance to wait for a better job to become available. Decreasing personal income taxes Decreasing business income taxes Learning Outcomes Part 3 Evaluating All Supply-side Policies Evaluate the effectiveness of supply-side policies through consideration of factors including time lags, the ability to create employment, the ability to reduce inflationary pressure, the impact on economic growth, the impact on the government budget, the effect on equity, and the effect on the environment. Keynesians favour Intervention Classicals favour Market Reform Everyone agrees that using demand management policies to cure equilibrium unemployment will be unsuccessful. However, it is in the choice of supply-side policies that disagreement is still to be found. Classical economists favour policies based on free markets and incentives, such as lower taxes and privatisation. Keynesian economists prefer supply-side policies of interventionist type, such as government funding of worker recruitment/education and re-training centres. Problems with Interventionist Policies This is likely to involve a high opportunity cost as governments will have to forgo spending in other areas in order to be able to afford the strategies. 2. If it involves large amounts of investment in building costly infrastructure, subsidising large industries or huge increases in public goods, then the problems associated with fiscal policy becomes relevant. 3. How effective are these policies if run by the government? Where is the incentive to provide cost-effective and well targeted assistance? 1. Problems with Market Reform Policies People who receive lower unemployment benefits or less welfare benefits will have a lower living standard and this will increase inequity in the economy and condemn more people to a life of poverty. Labour market regulations are in place to protect workers from unfair treatment such as being fired with due cause, guarantee fair conditions of work, such as working hours, holidays and safety at work. Environmental regulations are in place to protect the environment from immediate or long term issues that may become more costly as more economic growth occurs.