Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Earth's rotation wikipedia , lookup
Exploration of Jupiter wikipedia , lookup
Kuiper belt wikipedia , lookup
Near-Earth object wikipedia , lookup
Scattered disc wikipedia , lookup
Planets in astrology wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Streaming instability wikipedia , lookup
Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Seminar topics Kozai cycles in comet motions The Nice Model and the LHB NEO close encounters Kozai cycles • Paper: M.E. Bailey, J.E. Chambers, G. Hahn Origin of sungrazers: a frequent cometary end-state Astron. Astrophys. 257, 315-322 (1992) Sun-grazing comets • Example: Comet C/1965 S1 Ikeya-Seki • q = 0.0078 AU • More recently, the SOHO spacecraft has discovered > 1000 faint sun-grazers Origin of sun-grazers • Why is the perihelion distance so small? • The orbits do not pass close to Jupiter’s orbit – it’s not close encounter perturbations • We need a secular mechanism that can drain angular momentum from a cometary orbit – the Kozai mechanism Kozai cycles • Long-term integrations of cometary motions often show large-scale oscillations of eccentricity and inclination due to a resonance between and so that librates around 90o or 270o: • Kozai resonance • libration Theory Consider the circular restricted 3-body problem Average the motion over the orbital periods to get the long-term (secular) behaviour Then the semi-major axis is constant We also have the Jacobi integral, which gives rise to the Tisserand relation: T aJ a 2 1 e 2 cosi a aJ E Hz 2 2 1 e cos Both a and T are constants i is constant Theory, ctd The third integral (the most complicated one!) The average of the perturbing gravitational potential of Jupiter: This reduces to: e2 5sin 2 isin 2 2 const. One can plot curves in a (e,) diagram Kozai diagrams • librations around 90o are seen for several comets • Large amplitudes in e and i are seen near the separatrix e can get very close to 1 Numerical results • The amplitude in q is not constant because of intervening effects like a mean motion resonance • The comet finally falls into the Sun • Conclusion: many comets are subject to this fate, since their Hz values are rather small The Nice Model • Paper: R. Gomes, H.F.Levison, K. Tsiganis, A. Morbidelli Origin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets Nature 435, 466-469 (2005) Planetesimal scattering • Hyperbolic deflection changes the orbits of small bodies passing close to major planets – especially if the velocities are small • Energy and angular momentum are exchanged • After interacting with a mass of planetesimals similar to the planet’s own mass, its orbit may be significantly affected “migration” Shaping of the Solar System • The outward migration of Uranus and Neptune may explain how they could be formed rapidly enough to capture gas from the Solar Nebula • The concentration of resonant TNOs (“Plutinos”) can be explained by trapping induced by Neptune’s outward migration • But the giant planets may have started in dangerously close proximity to each other! The “Nice Model” - Distribute the planets from 5.5 to 14.2 AU (in a typical case) with PSat < 2PJup - Measure the lifetime of stray planetesimals dispersal before the gas disk disappears - Integrate the system of planets and an external planetesimal disk of ~30 MEarth - Migration causes crossing of the Jupiter/Saturn 2:1 mean motion resonance Nice model results (1) • When the gas disk was blown away, the planetesimal disk started ~1 AU beyond Neptune • Subsequent migration led to 2:1 resonance crossing after ~200900 Myr • Jupiter’s and Saturn’s eccentricities were excited • Uranus’ and Neptune’s eccentricities increased by secular resonances close encounters U+N crossed the disk and migrated outward, removing the planetesimals Gomes et al. (2005) The spikes indicate the lifetimes of individual planetesimals Nice model results (2) • Rapid clearing of the outer disk heavy cometary + asteroidal bombardment of the Moon • The clearing also caused migration of Jupiter and Saturn, and sweeping of secular resonances through the Main Belt heavy asteroidal bombardment • This episodic bombardment fits with lunar crater statistics and may explain the “Late Heavy Bombardment” Planet orbits Lunar impacts Gomes et al. (2005) The Late Heavy Bombardment • Lunar stratigraphic units were sampled by the Apollo & Luna missions and radioactively dated • These units are typically associated with impact basins • Their ages correlate with the corresponding crater densities • Near 4 Gyr of age, there is a dramatic upturn in the crater density plot, indicating a very large flux of impacts Nice model results (3) • The initial planetesimal disk must have ended at ~30 AU; thus the TNOs have been emplaced during the gravitational clearing of the disk • Any pre-existing Trojans would have been expelled during the 2:1 resonance crossing but new objects (icy planetesimals) were captured • The same holds for the irregular satellites of the giant planets The Nice Model: Simulation QuickTime™ and a Cinepak decompressor are needed to see this picture. NEO close encounters • Paper: A. Milani, S.R. Chesley, P.W. Chodas, G.B. Valsecchi Asteroid Close Approaches: Analysis and Potential Impact Detection Asteroids III (eds. Bottke et al.), pp. 55-69 (2002) Target plane • The plane containing the Earth that is perpendicular to the incoming asymptote of the osculating geocentric hyperbola (also called b-plane) • The plane normal to the geocentric velocity at closest approach is called the Modified Target Plane (MTP) Question: for a predicted encounter, when the asteroid passes the target plane, is it inside or outside the collisional cross-section of the Earth? Gravitational focussing If rE is the Earth’s physical radius and bE is the radius of the Earth’s collisional cross-section: v e2 bE rE 1 2 v where ve is the Earth’s escape velocity: 2GME v rE 2 e Encounter prediction • Suppose the asteroid has been observed around a certain time, and the encounter is predicted for several decades later • We need to determine the confidence region of the orbital elements from the scatter of the residuals of the best-fit solution • Then this needs to be mapped onto an uncertainty ellipse on the target plane Encounter prediction, ctd • This mapping is most sensitive to the uncertainty in the semi-major axis or mean motion uncertain timing of the future encounter the ellipse is very elongated (“stretching”) and narrow • If it crosses the Earth, the risk of collision is calculated using the probability distribution along the ellipse Target plane coordinates • MOID = Minimum Orbit Intersection Distance • This is the smallest approach distance (minimum distance between the two orbits in space) • If the timing is not “perfect”, the actual miss distance may be larger Case of 1997 XF11 • Discovered in late 1997 • An 88-days orbital arc observed until March 1998 indicated a very close approach in 2028 • Hot debate among astronomers • Impact is practically excluded, but the MOID is very small Resonant returns • If the timing of the 2028 encounter with 1997 XF11 is near the MOID configuration, gravitational perturbation by the Earth may put the object into mean motion resonance, and impact may occur at a later “resonant return” • This is a common feature, and most impacts are likely due to resonant returns Close encounter model • Approximate treatment as hyperbolic deflections (scattering problem) • The approach velocity U is conserved: U 3T 2 • As the direction of the velocity vector is changed, the heliocentric motion can be either accelerated or decelerated controls the values of E and Hz Keyholes • Constant values of ’ after an encounter are found on circles in the b-plane • Resonant returns correspond to special circles • If the uncertainty ellipse cuts such a circle, a resonant return is possible • The intersection of the ellipse and the circle is called a “keyhole” • Keyholes are very small due to the stretching that occurs until the return 1999 AN10