Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Thomas Martin SIO 226 Paper Review Week 1 Isacks et al., 1968 The paper is largely observational paper of global seismicity and there locations of epicenters and how they're located on the borders of plates. The authors are hypothesising that seismology will be extremely important in “New Global Tectonics”. Today, students drop the “new” as the ideas in the paper today are considered the standard, and are taught in current undergraduate courses. The paper provides seismological evidence that mid ocean ridges are sources of new crust, and island arcs are areas where oceanic crust is destroyed. Tying these sections together, the authors relate all plate motions on a global scale, and how earthquake epicenter locations tie it all together that the mobile lithosphere hypothesis is true. The remaining parts of the paper go over some of the some of the future questions that need to be addressed, and some of the answers that seismology can possibly answer. The authors are not shy in their belief of “New Global Tectonics” and the mobile lithosphere hypothesis, and state in the paper they tried to stay as objective as possible, but the evidence is so overwhelming in support. The modeling assumptions are that the seismometers work, and the calculated slip rate in figure 16 hold true from previous work by Xavier Le Pichon. This paper is notable for the lack of math and calculations compared to modern papers on the subject. One of the biggest assumptions though is based of off Le Pichon’s paper in 1968 that describes global plate tectonics as only 6 rigid plates. As this is a great overview, today most would argue to do a more accurate representation of plate motions, more plates would have to be added into the model. This was early in the formation of plate tectonic theory. They realized within the paper that this is a much simplified version of the actual earth, and that more detailed analysis was required a later date. The main type of data is largely observational earthquake epicenters. In figure 1, they go over basic tectonic environments like subduction zones, mid ocean ridges and transform faults. Figure two and three are basic tectonic boundary maps, with velocity vectors. Most of the velocity data was taken from Le Pichon’s 1968 paper. Some of the other figures are idealized oceanic-continental convergence zones (trenches) and a diagram of transform faults on a mid ocean ridge. In one diagram, is just the bathymetry of a trench system off of japan via seismic reflection. It is amazing to think of what is standard today was truly revolutionary thinking back in the sixties. Isacks et al future illustrate the complexities of the tectonics on a smaller scale with more localized diagrams of the gulf of aden and the gulf of california. Both early stage oceanic spreading centers, with similar tectonic regimes. On these diagrams they plotted earthquake epicenters, which correlate to the boundary of the plates. It is stated in the paper that the standardized seismograph network as described in Murphy 1966, vastly improved the earthquake fault plane solutions. The analysis is convincing, as this is a foundation paper in plate tectonics and truly tells the story of the importance of earthquakes in relation to boundaries of plates. Today this notion is pretty basic, but back in 1968, this was revolutionary. Another aspect of this paper that is amazing, is the absence of math. It just simply relates locations of epicenters along with “New Global Tectonics”. When I was a teaching assistant for SIO 10 this fall, we called it “action at the edges”, SIO 10 is a lower division earth science course, meant for non science majors. The ideas of “New Global Tectonics” today are mainstream. There case is made. In 1968 what was new, now today is the convention. It is just an observational paper, so you don't have to get lost in the math. But with improvements in technology and epicenter locations, the data can be improved on, but the large scale ideas of seismology, and the theory of the mobile lithosphere hypothesis relating to global tectonics still holds true. I would be pleased with my name on this paper. Today, it seems pretty basic, as the larger concepts get covered in an introductory undergraduate course, but in 1968 the field of plate tectonics was rapidly changing. At forty five pages it truly covers a lot of ground in the field of tectonics, and is a great introduction to what the authors call “New Global Tectonics”. As the data has improved in both quality and quantity, the basic understanding from this paper and ideas hold true today, forty five years later.