Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Downloaded from fn.bmj.com on November 7, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com Review Maternal use of SSRIs, SNRIs and NaSSAs: practical recommendations during pregnancy and lactation S D Sie,1 J M B Wennink,2 J J van Driel,2,3 A G W te Winkel,4 K Boer,5 G Casteelen,6 M M van Weissenbruch1 ▶ Appendix A is published online only. To view this file please visit the journal online (http://adc.bmjgroup.com) 1Department of Neonatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2St. Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3Department of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4Teratology Information Service, Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands 5Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Correspondence to S D Sie, Department of Neonatology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] Accepted 15 June 2011 Published Online First 28 July 2011 ABSTRACT Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are increasingly used during pregnancy and lactation, with 1.8–2.8% exposed pregnancies. Given the risks of untreated maternal depression for both mother and child, adequate treatment is essential. If pharmacological treatment with SSRIs is indicated, the fetal and neonatal effects of SSRIs have to be considered, as SSRIs cross the placenta and are excreted into breast milk. The overall risk of major congenital malformations during SSRI exposure in the first trimester does not appear to be greatly increased. Depending on the variability in pharmacokinetic properties between the different SSRIs and the individual drug metabolism of mother and child, SSRI exposure during late pregnancy can lead to serotonin reuptake inhibitor-related symptoms in up to 30% of exposed infants postnatally. Symptoms are generally mild and self-limited, but need observation during at least 48 h as some infants develop severe symptoms needing intervention. Limited data are available about the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after SSRI exposure during pregnancy and lactation, but currently, cognitive development seems normal, while behavioural abnormalities may be increased. In this article, the available clinical data are reviewed. Additionally, the authors provide a multidisciplinary guideline for the monitoring and management of neonates exposed to SSRIs during pregnancy and lactation. INTRODUCTION Depression is a common mental disorder with a lifetime prevalence rate of 16.2%.1 Women, especially during their childbearing age, are at increased risk for fi rst onset of major depression and have a lifetime rate of major depression 1.7– 2.7 times greater than men. 2 During pregnancy, prevalence rates vary widely from 1% to 20%, depending on the classification used. 3–7 Besides maternal morbidity and mortality, untreated or undertreated depression is associated with perinatal complications like caesarean delivery, prematurity and low birth weight, lower-quality interactions between mother and child and higher levels of psychiatric disturbances among children.4 5 8 Cohen et al9 described that 68% of women who discontinued antidepressant medication experienced a relapse of major depression during pregnancy, compared with 26% who maintained their medication. Given the potential serious consequences of perinatal depression for both mother and child, adequate treatment is essential. However, only few pregnant women F472 fetalneonatal214239.indd Sec1:1 seek treatment and only very few, small studies compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes after treated and untreated depression.6 10–12 Treatment of depression consists of non-pharmacological strategies, like psychotherapy, and pharmacological treatment with antidepressants. Although non-pharmacological interventions can be effective, most studies focus on pharmacological treatment.13 Nowadays, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely prescribed for the treatment of both depression and anxiety disorders. They are the most commonly used antidepressant medication in general and during pregnancy,8 with 1.8–2.8% pregnancies exposed to SSRIs.12 14–16 It is also used in anxiety disorders. Recently, Yonkers et al17 developed algorithms for periconceptional and antenatal management of depression. As SSRIs are frequently used during pregnancy, practical recommendations for the management of neonates exposed to SSRIs during the third trimester of pregnancy and during lactation are given. SSRIS Serotonin is a neurotransmitter released from serotonergic neurons and dysregulation of serotonergic activity may lead to mood and behaviour problems. SSRIs selectively inhibit the reuptake of serotonin into the presynaptic cell, leading to increased levels of serotonin in the synaptic cleft. Other, increasingly used, antidepressants are venlafaxine, a serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) or mirtazapine, a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA). Differences are observed with respect to the pharmacokinetic properties among SSRIs (table 1).18 Furthermore, pharmacodynamics are affected by enzyme polymorphism and individual drug metabolism. Side effects of SSRIs and SNRIs tend to be similar and include gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, insomnia and agitation. Tremors, excessive sweating and weight changes are also reported. Somnolence is seen in patients using mirtazapine, due to its antihistaminergic effect. FETAL EFFECTS Initially, small studies on humans observed no increased risk of major congenital malformations after in utero exposure to SSRIs or SNRIs, nor as a class, nor individually.19–23 However, more recent data with larger cohorts suggested an association with congenital heart defects, especially septal defects and, in particular, after exposure to Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F472–F476. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-214239 9/29/2012 4:38:54 PM Downloaded from fn.bmj.com on November 7, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com Review Table 1 Pharmacokinetic properties of SSRIs, SNRIs ands NaSSAs SSRI Paroxetine Fluoxetine Sertraline Citalopram Escitalopram Fluvoxamine SNRI Venlafaxine NaSSA Mirtazapine Time to peak (hours) Elimination half-life (hours) Daily dose (mg) 6–10 6–8 4–8 3–4 5 3–8 15–20 96–144 26 36 27–32 15–26 20–50 20–60 50–200 20–60 10–20 50–100 6–9 5–11 75–375 1–2 37 (Female), 26 (Male) 30–45 NaSSA, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant; SNRIs, serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. paroxetine.24 25 However, after adjustment for potential confounders, there was no significant association with cardiac malformations for paroxetine in the fi rst study. 26 Källén et al extended their data with more patients resulting in a lower OR (1.66, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.53) for paroxetine and risk of any cardiovascular defect. 27 28 Several small studies thereafter gave inconclusive results.14 29–38 Methodological differences make comparison between the studies difficult. Considering the known incidence of congenital heart defects in the general population and the possible small increased risk associated with SSRIs, the overall risk of congenital heart defects is still relatively low. Nevertheless, it seems prudent to perform fetal echocardiograpy to women taking paroxetine during pregnancy and possibly to those taking other SSRIs. Regarding the overall risk for other malformations, until now the prevalence of major birth defects does not appear to be greatly increased.8 The available clinical data for specific antidepressants vary widely. Fluoxetine, paroxetine, citalopram and citalopram are the most studied SSRIs (more than 5000 subjects), compared with fluvoxamine, escitalopram and mirtazapine (around 300 subjects) and venlafaxine (around 1300 subjects). Currently, there is no association with major congenital malformations and use of venlafaxine or mirtazapine during pregnancy. 28 33 39–42 EFFECTS ON THE NEWBORN A variety of symptoms have been reported after prenatal exposure to SSRIs and to a lesser extent to SNRIs and NaSSAs. These symptoms include tremors, jitteriness, irritability, muscle tone regulation disorders, excessive crying, sleep disturbances, tachypnoea and feeding problems.43–45 Less frequently, lethargy, weak cry and convulsions have been reported.46 47 Symptoms generally occur within 2 days after birth and are usually selflimiting.44 45 48 Some retrospective cohort studies report an increased OR for hypoglycaemia after in utero SSRI exposure. However, indications (like jitteriness or feeding problems) for glucose measurements are not reported. Therefore, no recommendations can be given on whether routine glucose measurements are indicated. 28 49–51 Although non-specific, these clinical features are similar to the signs seen in adult SSRI discontinuation syndrome and resemble the neonatal withdrawal syndrome. However, the clinical picture is indistinguishable from direct toxicity of SSRIs/SNRIs, leading to overstimulation of the serotonergic system.44 Large pharmacological studies to distinguish withdrawal from toxicity are lacking. It is conceivable that the underlying mechanism might be different between patients and specific SSRIs/SNRIs, reflecting withdrawal in one and toxicity in another individual patient. Therefore, the term serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI)-related symptoms is used. The SRI-related symptoms occur in approximately 30% of in utero exposed infants.45 48 Several additional factors, like maternal dose and metabolism, the specific SSRI used, the individual drug clearance and possibly genetic predisposition, may be needed for symptoms to develop. 52 Levinson-Castiel et al48 used the Finnegan score to identify and classify SRIrelated symptoms in 60 prenatally exposed neonates. In the symptomatic group, 10 showed mild and 8 showed severe SRIrelated symptoms. No infant required any specific treatment. The Finnegan score is an objective method used in the observation of neonatal withdrawal symptoms in neonates exposed to hard drugs to identify the patients needing intervention.48 53 A Finnegan score ≥8 indicates severe symptoms with the need of intensification of the observation and measurements. If Finnegan scores remain high, pharmacological intervention should be considered. Although the Finnegan score is a nonvalidated tool in antidepressant-exposed infants, until now other objective tools are not available. 53 One should take into account that most studies focus on SSRIs and that less data about SNRIs and NaSSAs are available. Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the neonate (PPHN) is a serious and sometimes fatal condition occurring in one or two infants per 1000 live births. A case-control study of risk factors for PPHN, found an association between late prenatal exposure to SSRIs and the occurrence of PPHN. In the PPHN group, 3.7% was exposed to SSRIs after 20 weeks of gestation, adjusted OR 6.1 (95% CI 2.2 to 16.8). 54 Reis et al found an increased risk of PPHN after 15 cases of SSRI exposure in early pregnancy, RR 2.30 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.80). 28 54 Drug use late in pregnancy was not documented unless it was prescribed by the antenatal clinic. Two small retrospective cohort studies found no increased risk. Andrade et al 55 compared 1104 infants exposed to antidepressants in the third trimester (85% SSRIs) and 1104 controls, no difference in prevalence of PPHN between the two groups were found. In Rochester, 16 cases of PPHN among 25.214 deliveries were observed, not between the 808 SSRI users.42 In another case-control study, 377 cases of PPHN were reviewed for possible risk factors. SSRI use was not a risk factor. Wilson et al also did not observe SSRI use as a risk factor for PPHN. 56 57 Based on the available literature to date, no reliable conclusions about associations between PPHN and SSRI exposure can be made. However, it appears that the absolute risk of PPHN after SSRI exposure is not greatly increased. 58 NEUROBEHAVIOURAL DEVELOPMENT Only few studies examined the effect of exposure to antidepressants on neurobehaviour and cognitive functioning. In a review about long-term effects after prenatal and postnatal exposure to SSRIs, 13 studies with 387 children in total were reviewed. In 11 studies (paroxetine=69, fluoxetine=216, fluvoxamine=1, sertraline=8, citalopram=11), no impairment in neurodevelopment after prenatal or postnatal SSRI exposure is demonstrated. Two studies suggested possible subtle effects on motor development (fluoxetine=7, paroxetine=8, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F472–F476. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-214239 fetalneonatal214239.indd Sec1:2 F473 9/29/2012 4:38:55 PM Downloaded from fn.bmj.com on November 7, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com Review fluvoxamine=1, sertraline=15, not specified=50). 59 A prospective study conducted by Oberlander et al60 did not observe a relationship with externalising behaviour of 4-year-old children after prenatal SSRI exposure. Klinger et al assessed the long-term neurodevelopment of children who developed SRIrelated symptoms. Infants with SRI-related symptoms had normal cognitive ability, but were at increased risk for socialbehavioural abnormalities.61 Most studies evaluated neurodevelopmental outcome in the fi rst years, which is a poor predictor for neurodevelopmental and cognitive functioning later in life. Also, the majority of these studies concerned fluoxetine and to a lesser extent paroxetine exposure, so the effects of other SSRIs, SNRIs and NaSSAs are even less established. Due to methodological limitations and the lack of large population-based studies with extended follow-up, so far the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome remains unclear. EFFECTS DURING LACTATION SSRIs and SNRIs are excreted into breast milk in greater or lesser extent. In general, drug excretion depends on several factors like lipid solubility, maternal dose and metabolism, composition of fore and hind milk and time to milk peak concentration.62 Also, bioavailability of the drug in newborns and the infant’s individual metabolism play a role in the infant’s exposure to the drug during breastfeeding.63 Thus, there is a great variability in milk concentrations between breastfed infants as well as between the individual drugs. Several methods, like the theoretic infant dose (ID) and the milk-to-plasma ratio (M/P ratio) are used to establish the amount of drugs excreted into breast milk and the risks during breastfeeding. The M/P ratio represents the ratio of drug concentration in breast milk to drug concentrations in maternal plasma.63 The theoretical ID is the multiplication of the drug concentration in milk and the amount of milk taken. The relative ID is the percentage of the theoretic ID/kg/day and the maternal dose/kg/day. A relative ID above 10% is considered to be of potential clinical significance.64 Table 2 gives the relative ID for and the experience with the specific antidepressants. Note that some SSRIs, venlafaxine and mirtazapine are less well studied during lactation. Both fluoxetine and its effective metabolite norfluoxetine have a long elimination half-life (4–6 days and 4–16 days, respectively) and a relative ID of 6.5–11%.62 Due to its long elimination half-life, fluoxetine can accumulate in the newborn, subsequently resulting in an increased relative ID. Several case reports describe short-term complications Table 2 Management of maternal depression or anxiety disorder is best evaluated and adjusted before conception to ensure proper treatment during pregnancy. Regarding the adverse outcomes of maternal depression, recognising the symptoms and adequate treatment are essential. The different treatment options should be carefully evaluated and if possible, nonpharmacological treatment is preferred. If pharmacological treatment is indicated, several factors are of influence in the choice of antidepressants: prior response to pharmacological treatment, gestation, intention to breast feed and the safety profi le based on the available experience. In patients already receiving SSRIs, clinicians, for example, psychiatrists, should evaluate if pharmacological treatment has to be continued. In general, treatment should be unchanged in patients whose symptoms are well controlled. Some patients may be candidates for medication taper and discontinuation or switching to a more ‘safe’ antidepressant may be considered. Meanwhile, their clinicians should be alert to the relapse of depressive symptoms.12 17 Postnatal management After prenatal SSRI/SNRI exposure during the third trimester, infants should be closely observed for SRI-related symptoms, preferably close to their mothers on the maternity ward. An observation period of at least 48 h should be sufficient to identify infants with SRI-related symptoms needing intervention. Finnegan scores every 8 h are a useful instrument for an objective observation (Appendix A). Available data (n)64 66 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor Fluoxetine 6.5–11 116 Paroxetine 1.13–1.25 123 Sertraline 0.2 146 Fluvoxamine 1.34–1.38 13 Citalopram 4.4–5.1 72 Escitalopram 12 Serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor Venlafaxine 6.5 10 Noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants Mirtazapine ±2 10 fetalneonatal214239.indd Sec1:3 PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Preconception and pregnancy Relative infant dose and available clinical data during lactation Relative infant dose (%) F474 during exposure to fluoxetine in lactation.62 To minimise infant exposure, milk peak concentrations can be avoided by ‘pump-and-dump’ breast milk during the time interval when peak concentrations in milk is established, however, the time to peak concentration in milk is individually determined.65 There is a debate whether breast feeding can ameliorate SRIrelated symptoms, which would be conceivable in the case of a withdrawal mechanism. Until now, no comparative studies are available. Whether chronic exposure during lactation to SSRIs, SNRIs or NaSSA affects the developing human brain remains unanswered. The benefits of breast feeding are well established. When decisions have to be made concerning lactation during maternal use of antidepressants, these benefits should be taken into consideration, especially in this particular group of patients. Available data (n)67 Lactation 200 131 143 14 76 9 Discourage Preference Preference Consider Consider Consider 15 Consider 9 Consider Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F472–F476. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-214239 9/29/2012 4:38:56 PM Downloaded from fn.bmj.com on November 7, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com Review untreated depression and/or the benefits of breast feeding. Moreover, both clinicians and parents should be aware of the limited available data about long-term neurodevelopmental outcome after SSRI exposure during pregnancy and lactation. Competing interests None. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Figure 1 Practical recommendations for maternal use of SSRIs, SNRIs and NaSSAs during pregnancy and lactation. 13. 14. Finnegan score <4: no SRI-related symptoms. Finnegan score 4–7: mild SRI-related symptoms; symptoms are usually self-limiting and supportive care is usually sufficient. ▶ Finnegan score ≥8: serious SRI-related symptoms; intensification of Finnegan scores every 2 h. If Finnegan scores remain ≥8 in three subsequent measurements, treatment is indicated, for example, with phenobarbitone and reallocation to the neonatal department is advised. Neurodevelopmental follow-up focusing on behaviour should be considered in infants with significant SRI-related symptoms. ▶ ▶ Lactation Currently, there is no evidence that breast feeding should be actively discouraged in maternal use of sertraline or paroxetine; less is known about other antidepressants. There is one exception: due to the long elimination half-life of fluoxetine and the risk of accumulation, we discourage breast feeding in the case of maternal use of fluoxetine. A summary of the practical recommendations is provided in figure 1. Overall, when making a decision on the continuation of SSRIs during pregnancy and lactation, the fetal and neonatal effects of SSRIs have to be balanced out to the risks of 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F472–F476. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-214239 fetalneonatal214239.indd Sec1:4 Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 2003;289:3095–105. Burt VK, Stein K. Epidemiology of depression throughout the female life cycle. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63(Suppl 7):9–15. Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, et al. Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:698–709. Bonari L, Pinto N, Ahn E, et al. Perinatal risks of untreated depression during pregnancy. Can J Psychiatry 2004;49:726–35. Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, et al. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1071–83. Marcus SM, Flynn HA, Blow FC, et al. Depressive symptoms among pregnant women screened in obstetrics settings. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003;12:373–80. Marcus SM. Depression during pregnancy: rates, risks and consequences – Motherisk Update 2008. Can J Clin Pharmacol 2009;16:e15–22. Alwan S, Friedman JM. Safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy. CNS Drugs 2009;23:493–509. Cohen LS, Altshuler LL, Harlow BL, et al. Relapse of major depression during pregnancy in women who maintain or discontinue antidepressant treatment. JAMA 2006;295:499–507. Oberlander TF, Warburton W, Misri S, et al. Neonatal outcomes after prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants and maternal depression using population-based linked health data. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63:898–906. Suri R, Altshuler L, Hellemann G, et al. Effects of antenatal depression and antidepressant treatment on gestational age at birth and risk of preterm birth. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:1206–13. Wisner KL, Sit DK, Hanusa BH, et al. Major depression and antidepressant treatment: impact on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Am J Psychiatry 2009;166:557–66. Dimidjian S, Goodman S. Nonpharmacologic intervention and prevention strategies for depression during pregnancy and the postpartum. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:498–515. Bakker MK, Kerstjens-Frederikse WS, Buys CH, et al. First-trimester use of paroxetine and congenital heart defects: a population-based case-control study. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol 2010;88:94–100. Ververs T, Kaasenbrood H, Visser G, et al. Prevalence and patterns of antidepressant drug use during pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006;62:863–70. Bakker MK, Kölling P, van den Berg PB, et al. Increase in use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy during the last decade, a populationbased cohort study from The Netherlands. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008;65:600–6. Yonkers KA, Wisner KL, Stewart DE, et al. The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:703–13. Hiemke C, Härtter S. Pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Pharmacol Ther 2000;85:11–28. Chambers CD, Johnson KA, Dick LM, et al. Birth outcomes in pregnant women taking fluoxetine. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1010–15. Ericson A, Källén B, Wiholm B. Delivery outcome after the use of antidepressants in early pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999;55:503–8. Goldstein DJ, Corbin LA, Sundell KL. Effects of first-trimester fluoxetine exposure on the newborn. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:713–18. Kulin NA, Pastuszak A, Sage SR, et al. Pregnancy outcome following maternal use of the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a prospective controlled multicenter study. JAMA 1998;279:609–10. Pastuszak A, Schick-Boschetto B, Zuber C, et al. Pregnancy outcome following first-trimester exposure to fluoxetine (Prozac). JAMA 1993;269:2246–8. Diav-Citrin O, Shechtman S, Weinbaum D, et al. Paroxetine and fluoxetine in pregnancy: a multicenter, prospective, controlled study. Reprod Toxicol 2005;20:459. Källén B, Otterblad Olausson P. Antidepressant drugs during pregnancy and infant congenital heart defect. Reprod Toxicol 2006;21:221–2. Diav-Citrin O, Shechtman S, Weinbaum D, et al. Paroxetine and fluoxetine in pregnancy: a prospective, multicentre, controlled, observational study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008;66:695–705. F475 9/29/2012 4:38:56 PM Downloaded from fn.bmj.com on November 7, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com Review 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. Källén BA, Otterblad Olausson P. Maternal use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors in early pregnancy and infant congenital malformations. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol 2007;79:301–8. Reis M, Källén B. Delivery outcome after maternal use of antidepressant drugs in pregnancy: an update using Swedish data. Psychol Med 2010;40:1723–33. Bérard A, Ramos E, Rey E, et al. First trimester exposure to paroxetine and risk of cardiac malformations in infants: the importance of dosage. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 2007;80:18–27. Cole JA, Ephross SA, Cosmatos IS, et al. Paroxetine in the first trimester and the prevalence of congenital malformations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:1075–85. Einarson A, Pistelli A, DeSantis M, et al. Evaluation of the risk of congenital cardiovascular defects associated with use of paroxetine during pregnancy. Am J Psychiatry 2008;165:749–52. Malm H, Klaukka T, Neuvonen PJ. Risks associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1289–96. Oberlander TF, Warburton W, Misri S, et al. Major congenital malformations following prenatal exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines using population-based health data. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 2008;83:68–76. Wogelius P, Nørgaard M, Gislum M, et al. Maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of congenital malformations. Epidemiology 2006;17:701–4. Pedersen LH, Henriksen TB, Vestergaard M, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy and congenital malformations: population based cohort study. BMJ 2009;339:b3569. Alwan S, Reefhuis J, Rasmussen SA, et al. Use of selective serotoninreuptake inhibitors in pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2684–92. Louik C, Lin AE, Werler MM, et al. First-trimester use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2675–83. Kornum JB, Nielsen RB, Pedersen L, et al. Use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors during early pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations: updated analysis. Clin Epidemiol 2010;2:29–36. GlaxoSmithKline. Bupropion and Paroxetine (Study No. EPIP083). GlaxoSmithKline, UK, 2005. Djulus J, Koren G, Einarson TR, et al. Exposure to mirtazapine during pregnancy: a prospective, comparative study of birth outcomes. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67:1280–4. Einarson A, Fatoye B, Sarkar M, et al. Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to venlafaxine: a multicenter prospective controlled study. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1728–30. Wichman CL, Moore KM, Lang TR, et al. Congenital heart disease associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use during pregnancy. Mayo Clin Proc 2009;84:23–7. Boucher N, Bairam A, Beaulac-Baillargeon L. A new look at the neonate’s clinical presentation after in utero exposure to antidepressants in late pregnancy. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008;28:334–9. Moses-Kolko EL, Bogen D, Perel J, et al. Neonatal signs after late in utero exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors: literature review and implications for clinical applications. JAMA 2005;293:2372–83. Oberlander TF, Misri S, Fitzgerald CE, et al. Pharmacologic factors associated with transient neonatal symptoms following prenatal psychotropic medication exposure. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:230–7. Herbst F, Gortner L. [Paroxetine withdrawal syndrome as differential diagnosis of acute neonatal encephalopathy?]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2003;207:232–4. F476 fetalneonatal214239.indd Sec1:5 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. Pakalapati RK, Bolisetty S, Austin MP, et al. Neonatal seizures from in utero venlafaxine exposure. J Paediatr Child Health 2006;42:737–8. Levinson-Castiel R, Merlob P, Linder N, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome after in utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in term infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:173–6. Costei AM, Kozer E, Ho T, et al. Perinatal outcome following third trimester exposure to paroxetine. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:1129–32. Källén B. Neonate characteristics after maternal use of antidepressants in late pregnancy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:312–16. Van Driel JJ, Wennink JMB, Heres MH, et al. Intrauterine exposure to SSRIs: no reason for routine hypoglycaemia screening. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2010;154:A339. Oberlander TF, Papsdorf M, Brain UM, et al. Prenatal effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants, serotonin transporter promoter genotype (SLC6A4), and maternal mood on child behavior at 3 years of age. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:444–51. Finnegan LP, Connaughton JF Jr, Kron RE, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: assessment and management. Addict Dis 1975;2:141–58. Chambers CD, Hernandez-Diaz S, Van Marter LJ, et al. Selective serotoninreuptake inhibitors and risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. N Engl J Med 2006;354:579–87. Andrade SE, McPhillips H, Loren D, et al. Antidepressant medication use and risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009;18:246–52. Hernández-Díaz S, Van Marter LJ, Werler MM, et al. Risk factors for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Pediatrics 2007;120:e272–82. Wilson KL, Zelig CM, Harvey JP, et al. Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn is associated with mode of delivery and not with maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Am J Perinatol 2011;28:19–24. Tuccori M, Testi A, Antonioli L, et al. Safety concerns associated with the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants during pregnancy: a review. Clin Ther 2009;31:1426–53. Gentile S. SSRIs in pregnancy and lactation: emphasis on neurodevelopmental outcome. CNS Drugs 2005;19:623–33. Oberlander TF, Reebye P, Misri S, et al. Externalizing and attentional behaviors in children of depressed mothers treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant during pregnancy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:22–9. Klinger G, Frankenthal D, Merlob P, et al. Long-term outcome following selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor induced neonatal abstinence syndrome. J Perinatol 2011;31:615–20. Gentile S. The safety of newer antidepressants in pregnancy and breastfeeding. Drug Saf 2005;28:137–52. Gentile S, Rossi A, Bellantuono C. SSRIs during breastfeeding: spotlight on milkto-plasma ratio. Arch Womens Ment Health 2007;10:39–51. Weissman AM, Levy BT, Hartz AJ, et al. Pooled analysis of antidepressant levels in lactating mothers, breast milk, and nursing infants. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:1066–78. Lattimore KA, Donn SM, Kaciroti N, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use during pregnancy and effects on the fetus and newborn: a metaanalysis. J Perinatol 2005;25:595–604. Lanza di Scalea T, Wisner KL. Antidepressant medication use during breastfeeding. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:483–97. Gentile S. Use of contemporary antidepressants during breastfeeding: a proposal for a specific safety index. Drug Saf 2007;30:107–21. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F472–F476. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-214239 9/29/2012 4:38:58 PM Downloaded from fn.bmj.com on November 7, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com Maternal use of SSRIs, SNRIs and NaSSAs: practical recommendations during pregnancy and lactation S D Sie, J M B Wennink, J J van Driel, et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012 97: F472-F476 doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-214239 Updated information and services can be found at: http://fn.bmj.com/content/97/6/F472.full.html These include: References This article cites 61 articles http://fn.bmj.com/content/97/6/F472.full.html#ref-list-1 Email alerting service Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the box at the top right corner of the online article. Notes To request permissions go to: http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions To order reprints go to: http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform To subscribe to BMJ go to: http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/