Download Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-peer Lookup Service for Internet

Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-peer
Lookup Service for Internet
Applications
Abstract
• Fundamental problem: location of a particular
node that stores a particular data item
• Chord solves this problem
– Data location solved by associating a key with a data
item and storing the data/key pair at the node to which
the key maps
– Adapts efficiently as nodes join and leave system
– Experiments show that chord is scalable
Chord vs. Other Systems
•
•
•
•
•
DNS
Freenet & Ohaha
Globe
Plaxton et. al. (used in OceanStore)
CAN
Introduction to Chord
• Protocol for lookup in a dynamic P2P system
• Given a key, it maps the key onto a particular node
• Uses consistent hashing to assign keys to nodes
(allows for balanced load)
– Distributed routing information (log n entries)
– Message based updates to maintain routing information
(log^2 n)
System Model - Problems
• Load balance: spreading the load over all of the
nodes in a dynamic manner
• Decentralization: no node is more important than
any other
• Scalability: cost of look up grows as log n
• Availability: tables are automatically updated to
show new nodes, node with responsible for any
key can always be found
• Flexible Naming: no structure on the keys
(naming)
The Chord Protocol
•
•
•
•
•
Consistent Hashing
Scalable Key Location
Node Joins
Stabilization
Failures and Replication
Consistent Hashing
• Assigns each node and key an m-bit
identifier
– Uses the SHA-1 as a base hash function
– Node ID: hash the node’s IP address
– Key ID: hashing the key
• Intent – nodes can enter and leave with
minimal disruption
Consistent Hashing con’t
• Identifiers are ordered in a
circle (modulo 2^m)
• Key K is assined to the
first node whose identifier
is equal to or follows the
ID of K in the identifier
space
• This particular node is the
successor node
• In the circle, the successor
of K would be the first
node clockwise from K
Consistent Hashing con’t
Theorem #1 – For any set of N nodes and K
keys
1. Each node is responsible for at most
(1 + E)K/N keys
•
E = O(log N)
1. When a (N+1) node joins/leaves the network,
responsibility for K/N keys changes hands
Scalable Key Location
• aka routing information
• Only needs to know its successor
– Queries can be passed around the circle till it
reaches the node that is maps to
– Resolution scheme is inefficient…why?
Scalable Key Location
• Each node maintains routing information in a
finger table
– M = number of bits in the key/node Ids
– Each finger table has at most M entries
– The ith entry contains the identity of the first node that
succeeds N by at least 2i-1
• This node is called the finger of node N
– Note:
• The first finger of N is its immediate successor on the circle
• So…first finger = successor
Scalable Key Location
• Each node only stores
information about a small
number of nodes
• Knows more information about
nodes that are closer
• Finger table does not contain
enough information to
determine the successor of an
arbitrary key K
• Theorem #2: the number of
nodes that must be contacted to
find a successor in an N-node
network is O(log N)
Node Joins
• This is a dynamic network
– Each node’s successor must be maintained
– Every key K, K’s successor is responsible for K
• Theorem #3: any node joining/leaving will
use O(log2 N) messages to re-establish
routing and finger tables
• The finger table also contains a predecessor
pointer…why?
Node Joins
• 3 tasks needed when a node joins the
network
– Initialize the predecessor and fingers of the
node
– Update the fingers and predecessors of existing
nodes
– Transfer state for keys that node is now
responsible for
Node Joins
Stabilization
• Join algorithm aggressively maintains finger tables of all
nodes
• Stabilization is run on every node periodically to check for
new nodes
• Theorem #4: Once a node can successfully resolve a given
query, it will always be able to do so in the future.
• Theorem #5: At some time after the last join all successor
pointers will be correct.
• Theorem #6: If we take a stable network with nodes, and
another set of up to nodes joins the network with no finger
pointers (but with correct successor pointers), then lookups
will still take time with high probability.
Failures/Replication
• Key step in recovery is maintaining correct
successor pointers
– Successor list of its R nearest successors on the ring
– If node N notices that its successor has failed, it uses the first entry
from its successor list
– Theorem #7: If we use a successor list of length r=O(log N) in a
network that is initially stable, and then every node fails with
probability 1/2, then with high probability find successor returns
the closest living successor to the query key.
– Theorem #8: If we use a successor list of length r=O(log N) in a
network that is initially stable, and then every node fails with
probability 1/2, then the expected time to execute find successor in
the failed network is O(log N).
Simulation/Experimental Results
• Path Length
• Simultaneous Node Failures
• Lookups during stabilization
Path Length
• Experiment: 2k nodes, 100*2k keys, k=3-14
Simultaneous Node Failures
• Ability to remain
consistent after high
percentage of node
failure
• Experiment: 104 nodes
and 106 keys
– Wait for network to
stabilize then measure
fraction of keys that
could not be looked up
correctly
Lookups During Stabilization
• Lookup after failure but before stabilization
failure reasons
– Node responsible for key may have failed
– Nodes finger tables and predecessor pointers
may be inconsistent
Chord Applications
• Following are good applications for which Chord
could be a good foundation
– Cooperative Mirroring: balance the demand for a
particular file on a server with files that aren’t popular
at all
– Time Shared Storage: store someone else’s data when
you’re machine is up and they will store yours when
you are down
– Distributed Indexes: keyword search
– Large-Scale Combinatorial Search: ie-code breaking
The End!
• Questions
• Comments
• Discussion