* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Supreme Court
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union wikipedia , lookup
Polish Constitutional Court crisis, 2015 wikipedia , lookup
R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 2) wikipedia , lookup
Constitutional Court of Thailand wikipedia , lookup
Judicial review in English law wikipedia , lookup
Separation of powers in Singapore wikipedia , lookup
Supreme Court of India wikipedia , lookup
1988 Malaysian constitutional crisis wikipedia , lookup
Separation of powers wikipedia , lookup
Supreme Court of Pakistan wikipedia , lookup
Judicial review in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Separation of powers under the United States Constitution wikipedia , lookup
The United States Supreme Court The Roberts’ Court, 2012 Back row (left to right): Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen G. Breyer, Samuel A. Alito, and Elena Kagan. Front row (left to right): Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Anthony Kennedy, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Structure of the Federal Courts Article III of the Constitution • ‘The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish’. Judiciary Act, 1789 • Congress immediately set up a system of lower federal courts United States Supreme Court 1 court with 9 justices United States Courts of Appeals 1 in each of 11 circuits (regions) Plus 1 in Washington D.C. Plus 1 federal Circuit Court United States District Courts 1 in each of 94 districts. Constitutional Powers of SCOTUS • Separate, independent judicial branch of government, with clearly defined powers and a role in the system of checks and balances • National judiciary should be ‘Supreme’ • Supreme Court should be responsible for hearing certain types of cases • Final court of appeal • Court is independent of the other branches of government and political pressures therefore the judges would not be elected, but appointed • To ensure that the judges had independence from the people who appointed them, the appointment process was split • To ensure that judges decisions were based entirely on the merits of the case they were hearing, without concern about political pressure they were provided with protections – Could not be removed from office for political reasons – Income could not be reduced – Could only be removed if their personal conduct was inappropriate for a judge • Judges could reach any decisions they thought appropriate, although some aspects of justice were still to be regulated – Crime of treason, and punishment was strictly defined. Constitutional Powers not given to SCOTUS • Should there be other Federal courts? Some people felt that lower Federal courts would be too similar to the highest courts of the states, causing confusion and conflict – The Convention decided not to set up lower Federal courts, but gave Congress the right to do so at a later date. • Should the Supreme Court be given the right of judicial review? – Should they have the right to decide whether another branch of government had passed a law or taken action that was not allowed by the Constitution – Issue had already caused controversy in some states before the Constitutional Convention – Experience of states suggested that it was logical that the Supreme Court would have the power of judicial review. • Two views on whether this should be the case at Federal level. – Some argued that the limitations on the power of government in the Constitution would be meaningless unless they were enforced by a Supreme Court – Others argued that the power of judicial review would make unelected judges more powerful that the elected legislature and elected executive. Checks and Balances of the SCOTUS • • • • • Determines which laws Congress intended to apply to any given case Determines whether a law is unconstitutional Determines how Congress meant the law to apply to disputes Determines how a law acts to determine the disposition of prisoners Determines how a law acts to compel testimony and the production of evidence • Determines how laws should be interpreted to assure uniform policies in a top-down fashion via the appeals process, but gives discretion in individual cases to low-level judges. (The amount of discretion depends upon the standard of review, determined by the type of case in question.) • Polices its own members. • Appointment has to be approved by 2 other branches of government