* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download MISiS-02-08-2015
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Динамический эффект Лэмба в связанной системе сверхпроводникового кубита и СВЧрезонатора Д. С. Шапиро, А. А. Жуков, В. В. Погосов, Ю. Е. Лозовик Центр фундаментальных и прикладных исследований, Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт автоматики им. Н. Л. Духова (ГК «Росатом»), Москва НИТУ МИСиС, 2 июля 2015 г. Outline • Motivation: cavity QED nonstationary effects • Main idea: dynamical Lamb effect via tunable qubit-photon coupling • Theoretical model: nonstationary Rabi model beyond RWA • Results: system dynamics; a method to enhance the effect • Summary Motivation-1 Superconducting circuits with Josephson junctions - Quantum computation (qubits) - A unique platform to study cavity QED nonstationary phenomena First observation of the dynamical Casimir effect – tuning boundary condition for the electric field via an additional SQUID С. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, P. Delsing, Nature (2011). Motivation-2 Casimir effect (1948) Two conducting planes attract each other due to vacuum fluctuations (zero-point energy) Motivation-3 Dynamical Casimir effect: prediction (Moore, 1970) - Generation of photons (always in couples) - Difficult to observe in experiments with massive mirrors - Indirect schemes are needed Motivation-4 Dynamical Casimir effect: first observation (2011) tuning an inductance - Superconducting circuit system: high and fast tunability! - Statistics of photon states is in agreement with theory С. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, P. Delsing, Nature (2011). Motivation-5 Natural atom in a nonstationary cavity А.А. Белов, Ю.Е. Лозовик, B.JI. Покровский, Лэмбовский сдвиг ридберговских атомов в резонаторе, ЖЭТФ (1989). N. B. Narozhny, A. M. Fedotov, and Yu. E. Lozovik, Dynamical Lamb effect versus dynamical Casimir effect, PRA (2001). Atom can be parametrically excited even if cavity sizes far exceed quantum-mechanical atom size Motivation-6 Two channels of atom excitation (nonadiabatical modulation): - Absorption of Casimir photons - Nonadiabatical modulation of atomic level Lamb shift: dynamical Lamb effect. Excitation probability is proportional to the square of the Lamb shift modulation. Lamb shift: tiny shift of atom energy levels due to vacuum fluctuations. Dominant contribution to the shift is due to the zero-point fluctuations of photon field. Lamb shift for artificial macroscopic “atoms” (qubits) is not something illusive. Moreover, strong coupling regime is possible in contrast to natural atoms. A. Fragner, M. Goppl, J. M. Fink, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, P. J. Leek, A. Blais, A. Wallraff, Science (2008). Motivation-7 How dynamical Lamb effect can be isolated from other mechanisms of atom excitation? Fedotov, Narozhny, Lozovik, PRA (2001) Difficult to implement ! Our idea is to suggest a realization of the dynamical Lamb effect in superconducting circuit systems (natural atom qubit). Main idea-1 Dynamically tunable qubit-resonator coupling - In contrast to the optical system with a natural atom, it is possible to dynamically tune also an effective photon-qubit coupling A. J. Hoffman, S. J. Srinivasan, J. M. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, “Coherent control of a superconducting qubit with dynamically tunable qubit-cavity coupling”, PRB (2011). M. S. Allman, F. Altomare, J. D. Whittaker, K. Cicak, D. Li, A. Sirois, J. Strong, J. D. Teufel, R.W. Simmonds, “rf-SQUID-Mediated Coherent Tunable Coupling between a Superconducting Phase Qubit and a Lumped-Element Resonator”, PRL (2010). S. Zeytino˘glu, M. Pechal, S. Berger, A. A. Abdumalikov Jr., A. Wallraff, S. Filipp “Microwave-induced amplitude- and phase-tunable qubit-resonator coupling in circuit quantum electrodynamics”, PRA (2015). … - This possibility makes superconducting qubit-resonator system a very promising candidate for the observation of the dynamical Lamb effect Main idea-2 Two possible realizations • Dynamical coupling of a qubit (at rest !) with two resonators: nonadiabatic switching. Similar to the scheme with a natural atom • A simplified scheme: dynamical coupling with a single resonator No Casimir photons! Theoretical model-1 Rabi model beyond the rotating wave approximation (one mode photon field) photons qubit Stationary Lamb shift (perturbation theory in V): coupling Theoretical model-2 • Qubit-photon coupling: RWA, conserves excitation number. Dressed states. Counter RWA term, a perturbation. Responsible for the Lamb shift • V1 -- slow Rabi oscillations of both the photon number and qubit state Theoretical model-3 Rotating wave approximation • Wave function • Spectrum Theoretical model-4 Nonstationary system: qualitative picture after the coupling is turned on (full resonance) small parameter: Fast and slow degrees of freedom: V1 produces slow Rabi-like oscillations; V2 generates fast oscillations Superposition of slow and fast oscillations Theoretical model-5 Hamiltonian splitting Slow oscillations appear automatically Results-1: single switching + full resonance Probability of a parametric qubit excitation Excitation probability is proportional to the square of the Lamb shift modulation Results-2: single switching Number of generated photons An excellent agreement between a simple analytical treatment and numerics The effect, however, is very weak. Strong coupling regime? Results-3: parametric driving -- integrands are not oscillating in sign • Huge enhancement of excitation probability ! Results-4: parametric driving Photon states are strongly squeezed Results-5: parametric driving First-order photon correlation function Second-order photon correlation function Results-6: parametric driving Universal behavior - Qualitatively correct result, but quantitatively not so good. - Universality, however, does exist Results-7: parametric driving Squeezing Results-9: possible experiment How to observe experimentally? Photon field: - Parametric excitation of photons - Statistics of photon states is different from statistics for Casimir photons (both even and odd states are populated) - Slow Rabi-like oscillations of various photon characteristics photons are coupled to a qubit. Dynamical Lamb effect can be parasitic for a quantum computation: uncontrollable qubit excitation Summary • Dynamical Lamb effect can be realized in tunable superconducting qubit-resonator systems • Theoretical description of system’s evolution upon the modulation of qubit-resonator coupling constant • Parametric pumping as an efficient method to enhance the effect D. S. Shapiro, A. A. Zhukov, W. V. Pogosov, Yu. E. Lozovik, Phys. Rev. A 91, 063814 (2015) • Частота резонатора – 10 GHz • g – 1-100 MHz • Decoherence – 1-30 MHz or smaller in new transmons • Quality factor 10^4 • Resonator size - centimeter Дипольное приближение