Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Coordination Compounds Introduction - Part I The majority of compounds studied in the laboratory to date have either been simple ionic salts such as KCl or covalent molecules such as cyclohexane, C6H12. One way to understand the difference between these compounds and the coordination compounds to be studied in this experiment is to use Lewis acid-base terminology. In coordination chemistry, a pair of electrons from one atom is donated to an electron deficient atom to form a coordinate covalent bond. The atom donating the electron pair is acting as the Lewis base, and the atom accepting the electron pair is acting as the Lewis acid. The product of the interaction can be called a Lewis acid-base adduct or a coordination compound. The reaction shown in Figure 1. between ammonia, NH3, and boron trifluoride, BF3, to produce BF3NH3 is a simple illustration. The nitrogen atom in the ammonia donates a lone pair of electrons to the boron atom in the boron trifluoride to make a coordinate covalent bond. The chemistry of most transition metals is rich and diverse because of these coordinate covalent interactions. Figure 1. The reaction between boron trifluoride and ammonia. Prior to 1893, the formula for a compound known as yellow luteocobaltic chloride was written CoCl3.6NH3 as if it were made up of two compounds, ammonia (NH3) and cobalt (III) chloride (CoCl3). Alfred Werner, now known as the Father of Coordination Chemistry, studied a series of reactions involving this compound, and determined the correct formula. CoCl3.6NH3 + HCl (concentrated) → no reaction (at 100°C) CoCl3.6NH3 +3 AgNO3(aq) → Co(NO3)3.6NH3 + 3AgCl CoCl3.6NH3 + 1 1/2 H2SO4 (concentrated) → 1/2 [Co2(SO4)3.12NH3] + 3 HCl CoCl3.6NH3 + 3 KOH → 1/2 Co2O3 + 6 NH3 + 3 KCl + 1 1/2 H2O (at 100°C) CoCl3.6NH3 + 1 1/2 Ag2O + 1 1/2 H2O (moist) → Co(OH)3.6NH3 + 3 AgCl CoCl3.6NH3 + 3 AgX → CoX3.6NH3 + 3 AgCl CoCl3.6NH3 + 3 HX → CoX3.6NH3 + 3 HCl Werner observed a number of facts in these reactions. He noted that six ammonia molecules always remained in the product for each cobalt atom. and that the ammonia didn't react. There was no reaction with concentrated hydrochloric acid. The yellow luteocobaltic chloride did react with sulfuric acid but the acid didn't break the ammonia away from the cobalt. Only reaction with KOH destroyed whatever interaction was holding the together the cobalt and the ammonia. However, Werner noted the chloride in the yellow luteocobaltic chloride reacted with almost anything. The chloride could be Page 1 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds precipitated by reaction with silver nitrate. The chloride could be replaced with another halide (X) by reacting the yellow luteocobaltic chloride with either a silver halide (AgX) or a binary acid (HX). Finally, Werner observed from freezing point depression and osmotic pressure studies that the compound was ionic and the van’t Hoff factor (i) for the compound was close to 4. That meant there were four moles of ions present per mole of compound. Werner concluded the proper formulation of the compound was [Co(NH3)6]C13. Hexamminecobalt(III) chloride, [Co(NH3)6]Cl3, is an ionic compound. The cation is the complex ion hexamminecobalt(III), Co(NH3)63+, and the anion is the chloride ion. The cation has a charge of 3+ requiring three chloride ions each with a charge of 1- to form a neutral compound. The complex cation Co(NH3)63+ is a coordination complex. The Co3+ cation is electron deficient and is surrounded by six ammonia molecules each capable of donating an electron pair to the metal ion in a coordinate covalent bond as shown in Figure 2. The structure of the complex is octahedral, with the metal ion at the center of the octahedron and the nitrogen atoms at the vertices. Figure 2. The hexamminecobalt(III) ), Co(NH3)63+, anion. In theory, any species with a lone pair of electrons can behave as a Lewis base and donate a pair of electrons to a central metal atom to form a coordination complex or compound. The term ligand is often used to describe any species that exhibits this kind of chemistry and literally hundreds of ligands are known. Two examples of neutral molecules that can be ligands are ammonia and water. Anions such as hydroxide (OH1-), fluoride (Fl-), chloride (Cl1-), bromide (Br1-), iodide (I1-), and cyanide (CN1-) ions can also behave as ligands. The cyanide ion is different from the other ligands mentioned so far because it can donate an electron pair from either the carbon atom or nitrogen atom end of the ion. If the electron pair is donated from the C end of the ion a M-C≡N interaction is formed. If the electron pair is donated from the N end of the ion a M-N≡C interaction is formed. All the ligands mentioned so far usually participate in only one coordinate covalent interaction at a time. The term monodentate is regularly used to describe ligands which donate only one (mono-) pair of electrons at a time to a central metal atom. There are other ligands capable of donating more than one pair of electrons at a time to a central metal atom and they are referred to as polydentate ligands. Polydentate ligands range from those capable of donating simultaneously two pairs of electrons to a central atom (bidentate) to those capable of donating simultaneously six pairs of electrons to a central atom (hexadentate). Two examples of bidentate ligands are the neutral compound ethylenediamine (commonly abbreviated as "en"), NH2CH2CH2NH2, and the oxalate anion, C2O42-. The ethylenediaminetetraacetate ion (commonly abbreviated as “edta”) is a hexadentate ion regularly found in food products. The edta complexes metal ions which make Page 2 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds their way into the food from metal cooking and storage containers. The metal ions cannot react with the food causing oxidation (spoilage) when complexed by edta. Polydentate ligands are also referred to as chelating agents and the complexes formed by the interaction of chelating agents with a central metal atom are referred to as chelates. These last terms come from the Greek work chela for claw and is appropriate because of the way the chelating agent claws on to or wraps around a central metal atom. A complex salt containing iron(III) and the bidentate ligand oxalate will be prepared in part 2 of this experiment. The formula for the compound can be written KxFey(C2O4)z.3H2O. The synthesis of the compound can be considered as being in two steps. In the first step, insoluble iron(II) oxalate is formed from the reaction of a soluble iron(II) salt and oxalic acid: Fe2+(aq) + C2O42- (aq) → FeC2O4(s) In the second step, the insoluble iron(II) oxalate is oxidized with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the presence of excess oxalate ion to form the desired iron(III) complex: K1+ + FeC2O4 + H2O2 + C2O42- → KxFey(C2O4)z.3H2O + OH1(Note: this reaction equation is NOT balanced.) The compound will be analyzed in part 2 of the experiment to determine the values of x, y, and z. Experimental Procedures - Part 1 Synthesis of an Unknown Coordination Compound of Iron(III) Be sure to record all weights and observations about colors, color changes, precipitates, etc., in your laboratory notebook. label each section of your notebook to agree with the different sections of this experiment. This section should be labeled: Part 1 Synthesis of an Unknown Coordination Compound of Iron(III). Other sections should be similarly labeled. Weigh out about 10 g of iron(II) ammonium sulfate hexahydrate, Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2.6H2O, recording the mass of the sample to three places after the decimal point. Add 15 drops of 3M H2SO4 to about 30 mL of distilled water in a 250 mL beaker. Warm the solution gently on a hot plate. Slowly add the sample of iron(II) ammonium sulfate hexahydrate until it is completely dissolved in the solution. While stirring this solution, add 50 mL of 1 M oxalic acid using a graduated cylinder. The precipitation reaction between iron(II), Fe2+, and oxalate ion, C2O42-, to form insoluble iron(II) oxalate should occur. Carefully heat and stir the mixture almost to boiling on the hot plate. Remove the beaker from the hot plate and let the mixture cool and settle. The liquid layer above the solid precipitate should be clear. Separate the liquid layer from the iron(II) oxalate precipitate by first, gently decanting (pour off) as much of the liquid as possible from the solid. Discard the liquid and save the precipitate. Then use an eyedropper to remove as much additional liquid as possible from the precipitate. Wash the insoluble precipitate by adding about 30 mL of almost boiling distilled water to the precipitate in the beaker. Stir the mixture of the hot water and precipitate for 2-3 minutes and then allow the mixture to settle. Repeat the process of decanting away the wash liquid followed by removing excess wash solution with an eyedropper. Wash a second time with hot water, again removing as much of the wash liquid as Page 3 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds possible. (Remember, in this process, the solid precipitate is the desired product, FeC204, and is to be saved. Discard the wash liquid.) To the beaker containing the washed FeC2O4 precipitate, add 18 mL of a saturated (approx. 1.8 M) potassium oxalate (K2C2O4) solution using a graduated cylinder. Warm this reaction beaker and a large beaker (400 or 600 mL) containing approximately 100 mL of water on the hot plate to 40-45°C. Turn the hot plate to a low setting and place the reaction beaker inside the large beaker. Monitor the temperature in the reaction beaker to ensure it stays in the range 4045°C. Increase the setting on the hot plate if necessary. Mix 10 mL of concentrated hydrogen peroxide, H2O2, and 10 mL of water in a 25 or 50 mL graduated cylinder (Careful with the concentrated H2O2!). Slowly (over a period of 2-3 minutes maximum) and with stirring, add the hydrogen peroxide slowly to the warm reaction beaker. (Try adding the solution 1-2 mL at a time. Wait for the fizzing to stop between additions.) The solution may become basic enough that some rust colored iron(III) hydroxide precipitates from the reaction mixture. Do not be concerned, it should be redissolved in the next step. Remove the reaction beaker from the larger beaker, place it directly on the hot plate, and heat it almost to boiling. Quickly add 9 mL of 1 M oxalic acid, H2C2O4, to the reaction beaker. Continue to add 1 M oxalic acid dropwise and stir until a clear solution is obtained. (If precipitate is still present after 15 mL of oxalic acid has been added, filter the solution hot, discard the precipitate and use the resultant clear solution for the rest of the experiment.) Add 20 mL of 95% ethyl alcohol, C2H5OH, to the clear solution. This prevents oxalic acid from precipitating from the reaction mixture because it is more soluble in an alcohol-water solution than in pure water. If some crystallization has already occurred, warm the solution gently on a hot plate under the hood until all crystals are redissolved. Caution: alcohol is flammable and no open flames should be present in the laboratory when it is in use! Clearly label the beaker with your name and cover it with an inverted watch glass. Store it as instructed until the next laboratory period. A mass of green crystals should have formed in the beaker by the beginning of the next laboratory period. Prepare a suction filter as demonstrated by your laboratory instructor. Use a rubber policeman to transfer as much of the crystals and solution to the filter as possible. Use the liquid that comes through the filter (called mother liquor or filtrate) to wash any crystals remaining in the beaker on to the filter. Prepare 15 mL of a 1:1 mixture of ethyl alcohol and water. Use this alcohol solution to rinse the crystals in the filter, slowly pouring the solution over all the crystals. Wash the crystals in the funnel with three 10 mL portions of acetone. Caution: acetone is flammable and no open flames should be present in the laboratory when it is in use! Then allow the crystals to dry in the air. This should take no more than 15-20 Clean, dry and weigh a stoppered container. Transfer the crystals to this container when they are thoroughly dry. Reweigh the container and calculate the mass of product obtained. This compound is light sensitive. Wrap the storage vial with aluminum foil when it is not in use and keep it in a drawer as much as possible. Page 4 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds Introduction - Part 2 As stated earlier, the formula for the compound synthesized in Part 1 of this experiment has been written KxFey(C2O4)z.3H2O. The goal of part 2 is to determine the values of x, y, and z. Both oxalate ion and iron(II) ion can be analyzed by oxidation-reduction titration methods using potassium permanganate. Part 2 of this experiment will broken down into three steps. In step A, a solution of potassium permanganate, KMnO4, will be standardized by titration of sodium oxalate, Na2C2O4. After the concentration of the KMnO4 solution is known, it can be used in step B to determine the amount of oxalate in a sample of KxFey(C2O4)z.3H2O. In step C, the iron(III) in a sample of KxFey(C2O4)z.3H2O will be determined by separating it from the oxalate, reducing it to iron(II), and then titrating it with the potassium permanganate solution. Step A. Standardization of Potassium Permanganate Solution Permanganate ion, MnO41-, oxidizes oxalate ion, C2O42- , in acidic solution as shown in this reaction equation: 5 C2O42- + 2 MnO41- + 16 Hl+ → 10 CO2 + 2 Mn2+ + 8 H2O The permanganate ion is an intense purple in solution while all other products and reactants are colorless. Thus, when permanganate ion is delivered from a burette as the titrant into a flask containing a sample of oxalate ion, the solution in the flask will remain colorless until all the oxalate ion has been oxidized and there is a slight excess of permanganate present. The first persistent trace of violet in the reaction flask marks the endpoint of the titration. In this step, samples of known mass of Na2C2O4 will he titrated with a solution of KMnO4 of unknown concentration. The mass of Na2C2O4 in a sample can be converted to moles using the molar mass of Na2C2O4. The mole relationships implied in the balanced reaction equation above can then be used to convert the number of moles of Na2C2O4 in the sample to the number of moles of KMnO4 titrant required to reach the equivalence point of the titration. Finally the number of moles of KMnO4 required for reaction and the volume used can he used to calculate the molarity (M) of the potassium permanganate solution. Good laboratory technique is required to obtain good results. There is a second, interfering reaction between permanganate ion and oxalate ion that can lead to unreliable results. If a high local concentration of permanganate is allowed to collect, the permanganate can be only partially reduced in insoluble MnO2, instead of Mn2+. 3 C2O42- + 2 MnO41- + 8 Hl+ → 6 CO2 + 2 MnO2↓ + 4 H2O The reaction flask should be swirled constantly to prevent this build up of extra MnO41- in the region where the titrant is entering the solution. The appearance of a brownish color due to suspended manganese(IV) oxide indicates this interfering reaction has occurred. If the equivalence point has not been reached, the unreacted oxalate ion in the flask should react with the MnO2 and complete the conversion of the permanganate to manganese(II). C2O42- + MnO2 + 4 Hl+ → 2 CO2 + Mn2+ + 2 H2O These last two reactions can be added together in such a way as to cancel the MnO2, and obtain the desired reaction completely converting MnO41- to Mn2+. This preserves the stoichiometry, meaning the titration can be saved. However, if the equivalence point has been overshot, the titration is ruined and must be discarded. Page 5 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds A properly titrated solution will be faintly pink at the endpoint. The presence of BOTH pink and brown indicates a potential problem. A slight brown cloudiness may form in a properly titrated reaction if it is allowed to stand a few minutes after the titration is completed. This does NOT invalidate the titration. Experimental Procedures - Part 2 Analysis of an Unknown Coordination Compound of Iron (III) Step A. Standardization of Potassium Permanganate Solution Be sure to record all weights and observations about colors, color changes, precipitates, etc., in your laboratory notebook. Label each section of your notebook to agree with the different sections of this experiment. This section should be labeled: Part 2 Analysis of an Unknown Coordination Compound of Iron(III), Step A., Standardization of Potassium Permanganate. Other sections should be similarly labeled. Note: It is important that all apparatus be clean and distilled water used in all solutions, because impurities are frequently oxidized by permanganate. Obtain and clean a polyethylene storage bottle. After rinsing several times with distilled water, add 1-2 mL of 6 M HCl, and an equal amount of 3% H2O2 solution. Cap and shake the bottle so the solution comes in contact with all the surfaces. This step is required to clean it of any MnO2 (dark deposits). Then, rinse twice with 2-5 mL portions of the permanganate stock solution. Finally, obtain about 500 mL of the permanganate stock solution which is approximately 0.2 M. Keep this bottle closed as much as possible. Make sure the polyethylene squeeze bottle containing distilled water is full. A lot of distilled water will be used rinsing the walls of reaction flasks. Weigh out a sample of sodium oxalate of approximately 0.12 g in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Record all masses to three significant figures after the decimal point. Add 60 mL of 1.0 M H2SO4 to the flask to dissolve the sodium oxalate. Clean and rinse a burette. Rinse the burette with three 3-5 mL portions of the permanganate solution before filling to slightly above the zero marking. Open the stopcock fully to sweep any air bubbles out of the tip of the burette, and allow the level of solution to drop below the zero marking. Because the solution is colored, readings are taken with respect to the top of the meniscus rather than the bottom as is done with clear, colorless solutions. Do NOT reload the burette in an attempt to get the reading to 0.00. Force yourself to read the burette to two significant figures beyond the decimal point. Heat the solution of sodium oxalate in the Erlenmeyer flask to 80-90°C on a hot plate. Remove the thermometer from the flask before titrating. Be sure to rinse the thermometer with distilled water into the flask to prevent removing any sodium oxalate. Record the initial burette reading to two significant figures beyond the decimal point and begin to titrate. Do not add the titrant rapidly (about 5 drops per second is a good rate of addition), and constantly swirl the solution. Use one hand to control the stopcock while swirling the flask with the other hand. If titrant is added too quickly, or the flask is not swirled sufficiently, or the flask is not warm enough, brown MnO2 may form. If that happens, immediately stop adding titrant to prevent Page 6 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds overshooting the equivalent point. In a proper titration, the purple titrant is decolorized as it falls into the hot sodium oxalate solution. As the titration continues, the decoloration will take longer and the rate of addition of titrant should be reduced until it is essentially drop-by-drop. Eventually the addition of a single drop of titrant will cause a faint pink color to persist in the solution. (Place the flask on a piece of white paper to help see the end point. Also a flask of water makes a good color comparison.) Record the final burette reading, again to two significant figures beyond the decimal point. Repeat this procedure until consistent results are obtained. It may be necessary to complete the calculations to check consistency. The sulfuric acid used to dissolve the sodium oxalate may contain impurities which react with permanganate ion, and a blank should be run to take these contaminants into account. Add about 50 mL distilled water to 60 mL of the 1.0 M H2SO4. Be sure to add the water slowly to avoid overheating and spattering! Warm the flask to 80-90°C on the hot plate and record the initial burette reading. Add titrant drop-by-drop until a faint pink color persist. This titration should only take 1-2 drops. This volume will be subtracted from the volume of titrant used to obtain the corrected volume that will be used in the calculation of the molarity of the KMnO4. Calculations - Part 3 - Step A 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. For each titration, convert the mass of sodium oxalate in the flask to moles. Convert the number of moles of sodium oxalate to potassium permanganate using the mole relationship implied in the balanced reaction equation. Calculate the volume of potassium permanganate titrant used in each titration. First subtract initial from the final burette readings to obtain the volume of titrant added. Then subtract the volume of titrant used for the blank from the volume of titrant added to the sample to obtain the corrected volume of titrant used. Calculate the concentration of potassium permanganate from number moles of permanganate and the corrected volume. Average the most consistent results to obtain an average value for the concentration of the potassium permanganate solution. Page 7 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds Step B. Analysis of Oxalate in the Unknown Compound The same reaction used in step A is used in step B. In step B however the concentration of the titrant is known and the number of moles oxalate is unknown. This is essentially the reverse of what was done in step A. Experimental Procedures - Part 2 Analysis of an Unknown Coordination Compound of Iron(III) Step B. Analysis for Oxalate in the Unknown Compound Be sure to record all weights and observations about colors, color changes, precipitates, etc., in your laboratory notebook. label each section of your notebook to agree with the different sections of this experiment. This section should be labeled: Part 2 Analysis of an Unknown Coordination Compound of iron(III), Step B., Analysis for Oxalate in the Unknown Compound. Other sections should be similarly labeled. Weigh at least two 0.10-0.15 g samples of the complex salt in separate, labeled 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. Dissolve each sample in 10 mL of 3 M H2SO4. Warm the solution gently to dissolve the sample if necessary. Dilute each sample to a volume of about 75 mL using distilled water. Heat the sample to 80-90°C and titrate as in the standardization procedure. The endpoint color change may be somewhat different than before because of the presence of the iron(III) ions. Repeat the procedure until consistent results are obtained. It may be necessary to quickly complete the calculations to check for consistency. A blank should be run on a sample prepared identically as above without any complex salt. Calculations - Part 2 - Step B 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. For each titration, calculate the number of moles of permanganate that reacted using the average concentration of the permanganate solution and the corrected volume of titrant delivered. Convert the number of moles of permanganate to oxalate using the mole relationship implied in the balanced equation for the titration reaction. Convert the number of moles of oxalate ion, C2O42-, to the mass of oxalate ion in the sample using the molar mass of the oxalate ion. Calculate the percent oxalate in each sample from the mass of oxalate in the sample and the total mass of the sample. Average the most consistent results to obtain an average value for the percent oxalate in the complex salt. Page 8 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds Step C. Analysis of Iron(III) in the Unknown Compound There are two problems which must be addressed before the amount of iron in the sample can be determined by titration with permanganate. First, the oxalate in the sample must be removed before the iron in the complex is titrated because, as demonstrated in steps A and B, oxalate reacts with permanganate. Second, the iron(III) in the complex must be reduced to iron(II) before it can be oxidized by permanganate. That is why the iron(III) in the complex did not interfere with the determination of oxalate in step B; it is iron(II) which reacts with permanganate, but iron(III). The first problem can be overcome by taking advantage of the same reaction used to analyze for oxalate. 5 C2O42- + 2 MnO41- + 16 Hl+ → 10 CO2 + 2 Mn2+ + 8 H2O Addition of an excess of permanganate oxidizes the oxalate to carbon dioxide gas which evolves from the solution. That leads to a solution containing Fe3+ from the complex, Mn2+ produced during the destruction of the oxalate, plus excess unreacted MnO41-. The second problem can be overcome with a good reducing such as tin(II). An excess of tin(II) can be used to reduce iron(III) to iron(II). Sn2+ + 2 Fe3+ → Sn4+ + 2 Fe2+ It also reduces the excess MnO41- left over from the destruction of the oxalate to Mn2+. That leads to a solution containing Fe2+, Mn2+, Sn4+ produced in the reduction of the iron, and excess Sn2+. Unfortunately the solution is not yet ready for titration! The oxalate has been removed; it has been converted to carbon dioxide. The iron is in the proper oxidation state; it has been reduced from iron(III) to iron(II). However, the tin(II) left over from the reduction of the iron, can also be oxidized by permanganate. If it is left in the solution, it will interfere with the iron(II)-permanganate titration; it must be converted to another form that will not interfere Mercury(II) oxidizes tin(II) to tin(IV). 2 Hg2+ + Sn2+ + 2 Cl1- → Hg2Cl2↓ + Sn4+ Equally important however is the fact the product mercury([) precipitates from solution and cannot be oxidized by permanganate! The remaining solution contains Fe2+, Mn2+, Sn4+, Hg2+ and insoluble Hg2Cl2. The only species that can be oxidized by MnO41- is the Fe2+. 5 Fe2+ + MnO41- + 8 Hl+ → 5 Fe3+ + Mn2+ + 4 H2O The laboratory work should go smoothly if you understand the chemistry associated with each addition. It is strongly recommended that you understand this section before beginning the experiment! Page 9 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds Experimental Procedures - Part 2 Analysis of an Unknown Coordination Compound of Iron(II) Step C. Analysis for Iron(III) in the Unknown Compound Be sure to record all weights and observations about colors, color changes, precipitates, etc., in your laboratory notebook. label each section of your notebook to agree with the different sections of this experiment. This section should be labeled: Part 2 Analysis of an Unknown Coordination Compound of Iron(III), Step C., Analysis for Iron(III) in the Unknown Compound. Other sections should be similarly labeled. Weigh at least two samples weighing between 0.5 and 0.7 g of the complex salt into separate labeled 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. Be sure to record the mass to three significant figures after the decimal point. Add approximately 10 mL of 3M H2SO4 to one of the samples and warm the flask gently on a hot plate while the sample dissolves. Add 3% KMnO4 (NOTE: This is NOT the standardized KMnO4 solution, but a more concentrated solution available in the laboratory.) dropwise to the flask until the first permanent appearance of pink persists or a brown precipitate forms. What could cause the pink color? What could the brown precipitate be? Be sure to answer these questions in your laboratory notebook. You may also observe effervescence of the solution. Be sure to explain that in your notebook. The oxalate ions should have been removed from the sample by these additions. The next two steps are critical! The flask can be rendered useless if the wrong amount of tin(II) chloride is added. This is no time to be careless or impatient! Carefully add the tin(II) chloride, SnCl2, solution dropwise to the flask until a clear yellow solution is obtained. The yellow color is due to the Fe3+ in solution. Any precipitate formed in the previous step should redissolve. This should have reduced the excess permanganate ion in the solution to Mn2+. Carefully bring the solution to a low boil on the hot plate and continue to add the SnCl2 solution dropwise until the yellow color of the Fe3+ ion just disappears, and then add 1 or 2 drops more. This should have reduced the Fe3+ in solution to Fe2+. Only about 40 drops, 2 mL, of SnCl2 should have been used for both of these reductions, Cool the solution under the cold water tap or in a cold water bath. Add 10 mL of mercury(II) chloride, HgCl2, solution front a graduated cylinder to the reaction flask all at once. A white, silky precipitate of mercury(I) chloride, Hg2Cl2 should form. If the white precipitate forms, the iron(III) in the complex has successfully been reduced to iron(II) and all the interfering ions have been converted to non-interfering species. Iron(II) cations can begin to oxidize to iron(III) in the presence of iron, so proceed without delay. There is a problem if either no precipitate forms, or a gray precipitate forms. If the precipitate does NOT form, not enough SnCl2 was added in the previous step. There is either MnO41- or Fe3+ ion left in the solution, or both! If a gray precipitate results, elemental mercury has been formed. This can happen if either too much tin(II) chloride was added in the previous step, or the HgCl2 was added too slowly in this step. If either one of these problems is observed, the sample cannot be titrated. It is lost and you must begin the determination again with another sample. If the white precipitate forms, the sample is almost ready to be titrated. Dilute the solution with approximately 100 mL of distilled water and 25 mL of Zimmerman-Reinhart reagent. (The Page 10 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds Zimmerman-Reinhart reagent is necessary for two reasons. It prevents the chloride ion present from being oxidized by the permanganate titrant. It also contains a reagent that ties up the Fe3+ formed in the titration as a phosphate complex. This makes the oxidation of the Fe2+ to Fe3+ by MnO41- more complete by shifting the position of the equilibrium toward the formation of product Fe3+). Titrate the sample slowly with the standard permanganate solution until a faint pink color persists for more than 5 seconds. Repeat this entire procedure with fresh samples of complex until consistent results are obtained. It may necessary to complete calculations quickly to check consistency. Finally, it will necessary to titrate a blank as in steps A and B. Carry through the above procedure, omitting the sample. Add one drop of 3% KMnO4 to 10 mL of 3M H2SO4 and only 1-2 drops of SnCl2 as there are no oxalate or iron(III) ions present. Only a few drops of standardized permanganate should be required to reach the endpoint of the titration. Again, this volume will be used to correct the volumes of titrant used for contaminants present. Calculations - Part 2 - Step C 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. For each titration, calculate the number of moles of permanganate that reacted using the average concentration of the permanganate solution and the corrected volume of titrant delivered. Convert the number of moles of permanganate to iron(II) using the mole relationship implied in the balanced equation for the titration reaction. Convert the number of moles of iron(II) titrated to the number of moles of iron(III) in the sample using the mole relationship implied in the balanced equation for the reduction of the iron(III) to iron(II). Convert the number of moles of iron(III) to the mass of iron(III) ion in the sample using the molar mass of the iron(III) ion. Calculate the percent iron in each sample from the mass of iron in the sample and the total mass of the sample. Average the most consistent results to obtain an average value for the percent iron in the complex salt. Page 11 Principles of Chemistry II Coordination Compoounds Determination of the Empirical Formula of the Unknown Iron(III) Compound The following information is needed to determine the empirical formula of the unknown iron(III) compound: the percent oxalate in the compound, from Part 2 - Step B; the percent iron in the compound, from Part 2 - Step C; and the generic form of the empirical formula for the compound given in the Introduction to Parts 1 and 2 of this experiment. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Calculate the number of moles of oxalate in a 100 g sample of the compound using the percent oxalate determined in Part 2 - Step B and the molar mass of oxalate. Calculate the number of moles of iron in a 100 g sample of the compound using the percent iron determined in Part 2 - Step C and the molar mass of iron. Calculate the ratio of moles of oxalate to moles of iron using the results of computations 1 and 2 above. This should be quite close to an integer or a simple fractions Use this ratio to construct likely formulae for the compounds. Use potassium ions, K1+ ions, to produce a neutrally charged compound, recalling both the Fe3+ and C2O42- ions are charged. Finally, include the three waters of hydration as indicated in the generic form of the empirical formula for the compound. Using the empirical formula for the compound calculate the theoretical yield for the synthesis assuming the actual mass of iron(II) ammonium sulfate hexahydrate, Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2.6H2O, used in the synthesis is the limiting reagent. Note: It is not necessary to write the balanced equation for the synthesis to complete this calculation. The mole relationship between the starting material, iron(II) ammonium sulfate hexahydrate, Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2.6H2O, and the final product, can be inferred from the number of moles of iron in the formulae for the two compounds. However, it should also be possible to balance the equation for the synthesis given in the Introduction to Part 1 of this experiment, now that the formula for the final product is known. Calculate the percentage yield for your synthesis using the results of the calculation above and the actual mass of product obtained in Part 1 of the experiment. Page 12