* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 3 de Broglie`s postulate: wavelike properties of particles
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
De Broglie–Bohm theory wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Geiger–Marsden experiment wikipedia , lookup
Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles 3.1 Matter wave: de Broglie the total energy of matter related to the frequency ν of the wave is E=hν the momentum of matter related to the wavelength λ of the wave is p=h/λ Ex: (a) the de Broglie wavelength of a baseball moving at a speed v=10m/s, and m=1kg. (b) for a electron K=100 eV. (a) h / p 6.6 10 34 /(1 10) 6.6 10 35 m 6.6 10 25 (b) h / p h / 2mK 34 6.6 10 / 2 9.1 10 (electron) (baseball ) 31 100 1.6 10 19 o 1.2 A o A Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles The experiment of Davisson and Germer (1) A strong scattered electron beam is detected at θ=50o for V=54 V. (2) The result can be explained as a constructive interference of waves scattered by the periodic arrangement of the atoms into planes of the crystal. (3) The phenomenon is analogous to the Bragg-reflections (Laue pattern). 1927, G. P. Thomson showed the diffraction of electron beams passing through thin films confirmed the de Broglie relation λ=h/p. (Debye-Scherrer method) Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles Bragg reflection: constructive interference: 2d sin n o d 0.91 A , 50 o and 90 o / 2 65 o for n 1 o 2d sin 2 0.91 sin 65 1.65 A o (X - ray wavelength ) for electron K 54 eV consistent h / 2mK 34 6.6 10 / 2 9.1 10 (electron wavelength ) 31 54 1.6 10 19 o 1.65 A Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles Debye-Scherrer diffraction X-ray diffraction: zirconium oxide crystal electron diffraction : gold crystal Laue pattern of X-ray (top) and neutron (bottom) diffraction for sodium choride crystal Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles 3.2 The wave-particle duality Bohr’s principle of complementarity: The wave and particle models are complementary; if a measurement proves the wave character of matter, then it is impossible to prove the particle character in the same measurement, and conversely Einstein’s interpretation: for radiation (photon) intensity I (1 / 0 c ) 2 hN 2 N 2 is a probability measure of photon density Max Born: wave function of matter is ( x , t ) just as satisfies wave equation 2 is a measure of the probability of finding a particle in unit volume at a given place and time. Two superposed matter waves obey a principle of superposition of radiation. Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles 3.3 The uncertainty principle Heisenberg uncertainty principle: Experiment cannot simultaneously determine the exact value of momentum and its corresponding coordinate. p x x / 2 Et / 2 Bohr’s thought experiment: (1) p x 2 p sin ' ( 2h / ) sin ' x / sin ' ( a diffraction apparatus a / ) p x x ( 2h / ) sin ' / sin ' 2h / 2 (2) E p x2 / 2m E 2 p x p x / 2m v x p x x v x t v x x / t E ( x / t )p x E t p x x 2 h / 2 Bohr’s thought experiment Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles 3.4 Properties of matter wave wave propagation velocity: h E E mv 2 / 2 v w ( ) ( ) p h p mv 2 w v Why? a de Broglie wave of a particle ( x , t ) sin 2 ( x / t ) set 1/ ( x , t ) sin 2 (x t ) (1) x fixed, at any time t the amplitude is one, frequency is ν. (2) t fixed, Ψ(x,t) is a sine function of x. n 0,1,2,....... (3) zeros of the function are at 2 (xn t ) n xn n / 2 t xn n / 2 ( / )t these nodes move along x axis with a velocity w dxn / dt / it is the node propagation velocity (the oscillation velocity) Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles modulate the amplitude of the waves ( x , t ) 1 ( x , t ) 2 ( x , t ) 1 ( x , t ) sin 2 (x t ), 2 ( x , t ) sin 2 [( d ) x ( d )t ] d d ( 2 d ) ( 2 d ) x t ] sin 2 [ x t] 2 2 2 2 d d for d 2 and d 2 ( x , t ) 2 cos[ x t ] sin 2 (x t ) 2 2 (1) the velocity of the individual wave is w / ( x , t ) 2 cos[ (2) the group velocity of the wave is g dν / 2 dν dκ / 2 d Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles group velocity of waves equal to moving velocity of particles E dE 1 p dp d d h h h h d dE / h dE g d dp / h dp 1 dE E mv 2 p mv dE mvdv v 2 dp gv The Fourier integral can prove the following universal properties of all wave. x 1 / 4 for 1/ , and t 1 / 4 for matter wave : p h / 1 / p / h x x ( p / h) (1 / h)xp 1 / 4 px / 2 uncertainty principle E h E / h t ( E / h) (1 / h)tE uncertainty principle Et / 2 the consequence of duality Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles Ex: An atom can radiate at any time after it is excited. It is found that in a typical case the average excited atom has a life-time of about 10-8 sec. That is, during this period it emit a photon and is deexcited. (a) What is the minimum uncertainty in the frequency of the photon?o (b) Most photons from sodium atoms are in two spectral lines at about 5890 A . What is the fractional width of either line, / ? (c) Calculate the uncertainty E in the energy of the excited state of the atom. (d) From the previous results determine, to within an accuracy E , the energy E of the excited state of a sodium atom, relative to its o lowest energy state, that emits a photon whose wavelength is centered at 5890 A (a) t 1 / 4 1 / 4t 8 10 6 sec-1 (b) c / 3 1010 / 5890 10 8 5.1 1014 sec-1 / 8 10 6 / 5.1 1014 1.6 10 8 natural width of the spectral line h / 4 h 6.63 10 34 8 (c) E 3 . 3 10 eV the width of the state 8 t 4t 4 10 (d) / h/h E / E E E /( / ) 2.1 eV Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles uncertainty principle in a single-slit diffraction for a electron beam: sin y , py p sin p y p y p sin p y y p y h y h y 2 Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles Ex: Consider a microscopic particle moving freely along the x axis. Assume that at the instant t=0 the position of the particle is measured and is uncertain by the amount x0 . Calculate the uncertainty in the measured position of the particle at some later time t. At t 0 p x / 2x0 v x p x / m / 2 m x 0 At time t x tv x t / 2m x0 x0 x or t x Chapter 3 de Broglie’s postulate: wavelike properties of particles Some consequences of the uncertainty principle: (1) Wave and particle is made to display either face at will but not both simultaneously. Dirac’s relativistic of electron: E ofc 2radiation; p 2 m02c 4 (2) We can observequantum either themechanics wave or the particle behavior but assumption: the uncertainty principle prevents from observing Dirac’s a vacuum consists of aus sea of electrons inboth together. (3) Uncertainty principle makes predictions onlyatofallprobable negative energy levels which are normally filled points inbehavior space. of the particles. The philosophy of quantum theory: (1) Neil Bohr: Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. (2) Heisenberg: Principally, we cannot know the present in all details. (3) Albert Einstein: “God does not play dice with the universe” The belief in an external world independent of the perceiving subject is the basis of all natural science.