Download Linear Accelerators

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Woodward effect wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

DESY wikipedia , lookup

History of subatomic physics wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Varying accelerating fields
 Two approaches for accelerating with time-varying fields
Linear Accelerators
Circular Accelerators
Use many accelerating cavities
through which the particle beam
passes once.
Use one or a small number of radio-frequency
accelerating cavities and make use of repeated
passage through them.
This approach is realized in circular accelerators:
Cyclotrons, synchrotrons and their variants.
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
RF Accelerators
 The electric field is no longer static but
sinusoidal alternating half periods of
acceleration and deceleration.
𝑉 𝑡 = 𝑉0 ∙ sin 𝜔𝑡
g
ion+
𝐸 𝑡 = 𝑉0 𝑔 ∙ sin 𝜔𝑡
Wideroe structure
Rolf Wideroe
 Three important aspects of an RF linear accelerator
 Particles must arrive bunched in time in order for efficient acceleration
 Acceleration gaps must be spaced, so that the particle “bunches” arrive at the acceleration phase:
𝐿=𝑣∙

𝑇
1𝜆
𝜆
= 𝛽𝑐
=𝛽
2
2𝑐
2
The acceleration field is varying while the particle is in the gap; energy gain is more complicated
than in the static case.
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Acceleration in the Wideroe structure
Energy gained after n acceleration gaps:
n
q
U0
Ψs
𝐸𝑛 = 𝑛 ∙ 𝑞 ∙ 𝑈0 ∙ sin Ψ𝑠
Kinetic energy of the particles:
1
𝐸𝑛 = 𝑚 ∙ 𝑣𝑛 2
2
number of gaps between the drift tubes
charge of the particles
peak voltage of the RF system
synchronous phase of the particles
(valid for non-relativistic particles)
Velocity of the particles:
𝑣𝑛 =
2𝐸𝑛
=
𝑚
2 ∙ 𝑛 ∙ 𝑞 ∙ 𝑈0 ∙ sin Ψ𝑠
𝑚
Shielding of the particles during the negative half wave of the RF
Length of the n-th drift tube:
𝑙𝑛 = 𝑣𝑛 ∙
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
𝜏𝑅𝐹
1
= 𝑣𝑛 ∙
2
2 ∙ 𝜈𝑅𝐹
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Linear accelerator
acceleration electrodes
ions
ion beam

+

+
l1
l2
U

l3
acceleration only between the electrodes
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Principle of the acceleration
Electromagnetic wave is traveling, pushing particles along with it
Moving electric wave
RF in phase
with particles
Positively charged particles
close to the crest of the
E-M wave experience the most force forward; those closer to
the centre experience less of a force. The result is that the
particles tend to move together with the wave.
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Principle of the acceleration
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Wideroe structure at GSI
27 MHz Radio frequency
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
 The Wideroe linac is only efficient for low-energy heavy ions
 When using 10 MHz frequency, the length of the drift tubes
becomes prohibitive for high-energy protons
length of the drift tubes [m]
Alvarez structure – standing-wave linear accelerator
proton energy [MeV]
 Alvarez accelerator = resonant cavity
Standing waves with E-field along direction of particle motion.
While the electric fields point in the “wrong direction” the particles
are shielded by the drift tubes.
The accelerator consists of a long “tank” (radius determines frequency).
Drift tubes are placed along the beam axis, so that the accelerating gaps
satisfy synchronicity condition with drift tube length L given by 𝐿 = 𝛽𝜆0
where λ0 is the free space wavelength at the operating frequency .
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Standing wave cavities
The mode names correspond to the phase difference from one cell to the next
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
UNILAC Alvarez Accelerator
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Synchrotron
As linacs are dominated by cavities, circular maschines are dominated by magnets


Both the accelerating field frequency and the magnetic
field strength change synchronously with time to match
energy and keep revolution radius constant.
Magnetic field produced by several bending magnets
increases with momentum. For high energy:
𝐸𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝐺𝑒𝑉 ≈ 0.3 ∙ 𝐵𝜌 𝑇 ∙ 𝑚



Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Practical limitations for magnetic field → high energies
only at large radius.
example: 100 GeV protons
Fe-magnet
B ~ 1.5 T → R = 222 m
superconductive magnet B ~ 5 T → R = 67 m
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Synchrotron
Mark Oliphant 1943

The bending field changes with particle beam energy to maintain a constant radius:
1
𝐵𝑇
𝐵𝑇
= 0.3
= 0.3
𝜌𝑚
𝛽𝐸 𝐺𝑒𝑉
𝑐𝑝 𝐺𝑒𝑉


So B ramps in proportion to the momentum. The revolution frequency also changes with momentum.
The synchronicity condition, including now the relativistic term, is
𝑞𝐵
𝜔=
𝑚𝛾


For an electron synchrotron, the injected beam is already relativistic, so only the magnetic field
changes with beam energy.
For a proton synchrotron, the injected beam is not yet relativistic, so the RF accelerating frequency
and the magnetic field both ramp with energy.
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
SIS - SchwerIonenSynchrotron
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
SIS - SchwerIonenSynchrotron
acceleration
> 100 000 turns/s
eff. puls width
for injection: 47μs
36.2% efficiency
deflecting magnets
( < 1.8 T )
focussing magnets
Ion
period of one revolution 4.7μs
10 turns will be accepted for injection
UNILAC
experiment
Number of
injections
Intensity
[spill-1]
at FRS
Ion
source
Date
58Ni
1
6*109
MEVVA
3.2006
107Ag
1
3*109
MEVVA
2.2006
124Xe
1
5*109
MUCIS
3.2008
136Xe
4
5*109
MEVVA
7.2006
208Pb
30
1.3*109
PIG
3.2006
238U
1
2.0*109
PIG
9.2009
intensity[s-1]=0.5*intensity[spill-1]
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim - 2016