Download Sect. 8.2 - TTU Physics

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) wikipedia , lookup

Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Inertia wikipedia , lookup

Centripetal force wikipedia , lookup

Kinematics wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup

Derivations of the Lorentz transformations wikipedia , lookup

Internal energy wikipedia , lookup

Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup

Momentum wikipedia , lookup

First class constraint wikipedia , lookup

Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Work (thermodynamics) wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Gibbs free energy wikipedia , lookup

Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup

Hunting oscillation wikipedia , lookup

Heat transfer physics wikipedia , lookup

Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Lagrangian mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup

Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup

Dirac bracket wikipedia , lookup

Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector wikipedia , lookup

Analytical mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Routhian mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Hamiltonian mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Sect. 8.2: Cyclic Coordinates &
Conservation Theorems
• Definition of the Hamiltonian: (sum on i)
H(q,p,t)  qipi – L(q,q,t)
(1)
• A cyclic coordinate qi  one which doesn’t appear in the
Lagrangian L. Lagrange Eqtns  pi  (∂L/∂qi) = 0
 pi  (∂L/∂qi) = constant. The momentum
conjugate to a cyclic coordinate qi is conserved.
• Hamilton’s Eqtns get the same result. qi is cyclic
 From (1) qi doesn’t appear in H either. Hamilton’s
Eqtn pi = - (∂H/∂qi) = 0  pi = constant. The
momentum conjugate to a cyclic coord qi is conserved.
All momentum conservation theorems from
Ch. 2 hold also in the Hamiltonian
formalism. In Sect. 2.6, merely replace L with
H & all else carries over directly!
• This statement includes the connections between the
invariance or symmetry properties of the system &
the conserved generalized momenta.
 If the system is invariant (symmetrical) under uniform
translation  A Linear momentum is conserved.
 System is invariant (symmetrical) under uniform
rotation  An Angular momentum is conserved.
• What about energy conservation? For H = H(q,p,t)
(dH/dt)  (H/qi)qi + (H/pi)pi + (H/t)
Hamilton’s Eqtns: qi = (H/pi), pi = - (H/qi)

(dH/dt) = (H/t)
(a)
In the derivation of Hamilton’s Eqtns, we also showed:
(H/t) = - (L/t)
(b)
(a) & (b) together: (dH/dt) = - (L/t)
If L doesn’t depend explicitly on the time
(L/t) = 0 neither does H: (dH/dt) = 0

H = constant (conserved)
• Does H = constant (conserved) mean that
energy is conserved? Not necessarily!
• As in our discussion of the energy function h
in Ch. 2, (Sect. 2.7) the questions
1) Whether H = the total energy E
&
2) Whether H is conserved
are 2
separate questions!
Our discussion in Ch. 2 about the energy function h,
also holds for the Hamiltonian H = qjpj - L
• Special cases:
a.) The transformation equations from Cartesian to
Generalized Coordinates are time independent
b.) The potential V is velocity independent.
Only if a.) & b.) are BOTH satisfied is it true that:
 H = T + V = E  Total Mechanical Energy
• Under these conditions, if V is time independent,
(∂L/∂t) = (dH/dt) = 0

H = E = constant (conserved)
• Summary: Different Conditions:
The Hamiltonian: H = qjpj - L
ALWAYS: (dH/dt) = - (∂L/∂t)
SOMETIMES: V does not depend on t
 (dH/dt) = 0 & H = constant (conserved)
USUALLY:
H = T + V = E  Total Mechanical Energy
 Conservation Theorem for Mechanical Energy:
If H = E AND it does not depend on t,
E is conserved!
• Clearly, the conditions for conservation of the
Hamiltonian H are DISTINCT from those
which make it the total mechanical energy E.
 We can have conditions in which:
1. H is conserved & = E
2. H is not conserved & = E
3. H is conserved &  E
4. H is not conserved &  E
The most common case in classical (& quantum) mechanics is case 1.
• Stated another way, there are two questions:
1. Does the Hamiltonian H = E for the system?
2. Is the mechanical energy E conserved for the system?
• These are 2 aspects of the problem & are DIFFERENT questions!
– We may have cases where H  E, but E is conserved.
– For example: A conservative system, using generalized coordinates
which are in motion with respect to fixed rectangular axes:


The transformation equations will contain the time
T will NOT be a homogeneous, quadratic function
of the generalized velocities!
 H  E, However, because the system is conservative,
E is conserved! (This is a physical fact about the system,
independent of coordinate choices!).
• Note: L is independent of the choice of generalized coordinates.
However, H depends on this choice! That is, for one choice of
the qi, H may be conserved & for another it may not!
• Example: Consider the 1d system in the figure:
A point mass m is attached to an ideal spring, constant k.
Other end of the spring is fixed on a massless cart moving
(by external means) to the right at constant speed v0.
• Choose the origin so the cart is there at t = 0.
Lagrangian: L(x,x) = T – V
= (½)mx2 - (½)k(x – v0t)2
Lagrange’s Equation:
mx = -k(x – v0t)
• Hamiltonian?
• x is the Cartesian coordinate of the mass, V doesn’t
involve velocity x  H = total energy of the system:
H = H(x,p,t) = E = T + V = p2(2m)-1 + (½)k(x – v0t)2
However, H = H(t)  (dH/dt)  0  H  constant
H is NOT conserved, but it IS the total energy!
• Another way to solve this:
Change coordinates from x to
x´ = x – v0t
 The Lagrangian:
L(x´,x´) = (½)m(x´+ v0)2 - (½)k(x´)2
= (½)m(x´)2 + mx´v0 + (½)m(v0)2 - (½)k(x´)2  mx´ = -kx´
• The Hamiltonian?
• There is a term in L (mx´v0) which is linear in x´. Corresponds
to the qa term in the general formalism we’ve discussed. Here,
a = mv0. Using that formalism (or otherwise) the Hamiltonian:
H = H(x´,p´) = (p´- mv0)2(2m)-1 + (½)k(x´)2 – (½)m(v0)2
Now, H  H(t)  (dH/dt) = 0  H = constant
H IS conserved, but it IS NOT the total energy!
(It is the energy of MOTION of m relative to the moving cart)
• SUMMARY: 1 Problem, 2 Hamiltonians!
Different in magnitude, t dependence, & functional behavior!
1. H = H(x,p,t) = E = T + V = p2(2m)-1 + (½)k(x – v0t)2
H = H(t)  (dH/dt)  0  H  constant
H is NOT conserved, but it IS the total energy!
2. H = H(x´,p´) = (p´- mv0)2(2m)-1 + (½)k(x´)2 - (½)mx´(v0)2
H  H(t)  (dH/dt) = 0
 H = constant
H IS conserved, but it IS NOT the total energy!
(It is the relative energy of MOTION of m with respect to the cart)
• Both Hamiltonians obviously lead to the SAME
equation of motion for the particle!
• Similar problem: A “dumbbell” of 2 masses, m1 & m2
connected by a spring of constant k (see figure):
• The center of mass (CM) moves
to the right at constant velocity
v0. Oscillations are only along
this same direction. Solve the
oscillation problem in the usual
way. The oscillations aren’t
affected by uniform motion at v0.
 The motion separates into the CM motion & the
relative oscillatory motion about the CM. Once the
motion is started, the energy E is conserved & the
Hamiltonian H = E & is conserved.
• A slightly different problem: The same “dumbbell” (see
figure): m2 moves to the right
at constant velocity v0. The
CM & m1 oscillate relative to
m2. This requires an external
periodic force! Oscillations
are affected by uniform
motion at v0.
 The motion doesn’t separate into the CM motion &
the relative oscillatory motion. Because of the external
oscillation force, the energy E is NOT conserved, the
Hamiltonian H is NOT conserved & H  E!