* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download M - Unife
Survey
Document related concepts
Neutron magnetic moment wikipedia , lookup
Energy harvesting wikipedia , lookup
Condensed matter physics wikipedia , lookup
Density of states wikipedia , lookup
Heat transfer physics wikipedia , lookup
Geometrical frustration wikipedia , lookup
Seismic anisotropy wikipedia , lookup
Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup
Energy applications of nanotechnology wikipedia , lookup
Nanochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Giant magnetoresistance wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Introduction to magnetism of confined systems P. Vavassori CIC nanoGUNE Consolider, San Sebastian, Spain; [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Basics: diamagnetism and paramagnetism Every material which is put in a magnetic field H, acquires a magnetic moment. In most materials M = H (M magnetic dipole per unit volume, magnetic susceptibility. paramagnetism diamagnetism M M H H Each atom has a non-zero magnetic moment m The moments are randomly oriented (T); H arranges these moments in its own direction. Eappl = - m0 M . H temperature kbT m= - mB(L + gS) orbital and spin angular In soilds m≈ Each atom acquires a moment caused by the applied field H and opposed to it (Larmor frequency). m= 0 e.g., noble gas. momenta - gmBS (crystal field) [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Ferromagnetism There are materials in which M is NOT proportional to H. M may be, for example, non-zero at H = 0. M in these materials is not even a one-valued function of H, and its value depends on the history of the applied field (hysteresis). saturation magnetization MS remanence Limiting hysteresis curve: all the points enclosed in the loop are possible equilibrium states of the system. MH coercive field With an appropriate history of the applied field one can therefore end at any point inside the limiting hysteresis loop. H Fe, Co, Ni, alloys also with TM and RE [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Origin of hysteresis In ferromagnetic materials the magnetic moments of the individual atoms interact strongly with each other creating an order against the thermal fluctuations. The magnetization of a sample may be split in many domains. Each of these domains is magnetized to the saturation value M s but the direction of the magnetization vector may vary from one domain to the other at H = 0. The interaction between the magnetic moments is not dipolar (too weak); it is electrostatic (Coulomb) determined by correlaction effects (Quantum mechanics): symmetry of the electrons wavefunction and Pauli principle → Hund’s rule Eex = -(1/V) ij Jij Si . Sj (short range interaction (Heisember hamiltonian H = - ij Jij Si . Sj) ij is over the nearest neighbors and V is the unit cell volume) Jij is the exchange integral Jij > 0 ferromagnetic order Jij < 0 anti-ferromagnetic order [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Phase transition ferromagnet →paramagnet Exchange interaction provides the magnetic order against the thermal fluctuations Ms (T) MS Above a critical temperature called Curie temperature (TC) all ferromagnets become regular paramagnets → MS = 0 at H = 0 TC T MS (TC-T) Since T < TC = ½ mean field theory (identical average exchange field felt by all spins) This temperature for anti-ferromagnets is called Néel temperature (TN) [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Why magnetic domains? Energy densities In vacuum u = B2/2m0 Inside a material u =1/2 m0 Ms2 Total energy U = ∫∫∫udt All space a) b) c) The field created outside the magnet in cases a) and b) costs B2/2m0 Joules/m3, thus case c) is the one energetically favoured. This is due to the finite size of the magnet, so it is an effect of lateral confinement. [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Magnetostatic energy It can be shown (Maxwell equations) that the dipolar magnetostatic energy Em can be espressed as: 1 Em m0 M r H d r d 3r 0 2 sample Where Hd is called, variously, demagnetizing field, magnetostatic field or dipolar field. Energy due to the interaction of each dipole with the field Hd created by all the other dipoles. The complication arises from the fact that Hd [M(r)]. Hd can be calculated like a field in electrostatics as due to the magnetic charges (bulk -• M and surface n • M ). The only difference is that they never appear isolated but are always balanced by opposite charges. n•M>0 + + + + M - Hd - - - n•M<0 [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Magnetostatic energy: examples Infinite ferromagnet uniformly magnetized - Hd = 0 Em = 0 n•M>0 n•M<0 - • M = 0 (M is uniform everywhere) and n • M = 0 (no borders) - d + + + • M = 0 (M is uniform everywhere) but n • M ≠ 0 (borders) • M = 0 (M is uniform everywhere) and n • M = 0 (M parallel to the borders) Hd= -M ≠ 0 Em > 0 Hd = 0 Em ≈ 0 [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Where M inside a domain is pointing to? Anisotropy The direction of the magnetization inside each domain is NOT arbitrary. For instance, the crystal structure is not isotropic so it is expected that along certain crystallographic directions it is easier to magnetize the crystal, along others it is harder (confirmed by experiments). The exchange energy term introduced so far (Heisemberg) is isotropic. We have to introduce a phenomenological expression for this additional term Eanis. There are several types of anisotropy, the most common of which is the magnetocrystalline anisotropy caused by the spin-orbit interaction (the electron orbits are linked to the crystallographic structure and by their interaction with the spins they make the latter prefer to align along well-defined crystallographic axes. In this case Eanis will be a power series expansions that take into account the crystal symmetry. [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Anisotropy sources (a) • Magnetocrystalline anisotropy: dependence of internal energy on the direction of sposntaneous magnetization respect to crystal axis. It is due to anisotropy of spin-orbit coupling energy and dipolar energy. Examples: - Cubic Eanis = K1 (ax2ay2 + ay2az2 + az2ax2) + K2 ax2ay2 az2 +…. - Uniaxial Eanis = K1 sin2q + K2 sin4q +… ≈ -K1(n . M)2 3 [K] = J/m • Surface and interface anisotropy: due to broken translation symmetry at surfaces and intefaces. The surface energy density can be written: - Esurf = Kp af2 - Ksan2; where an and af are the director cosines respect to the film normal and the in plane hard-axis. [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Anisotropy sources (b) • Strain anysotropy: strain distorts the shape of crystal (or surface) and, thus can give rise to an uniaxial term in the magnetic anisotropy. Es = 3/2 ls sin2q; where l is the magnetostriction coefficient (positive or negative) along the direction of the applied stress s and q is the angle between the magnetization and the stress direction. • Growth induced anisotropy: preferential magnetization directions can be induced by oblique deposition or by application of an external magnetic field during deposotion. [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Summary of energy contributions Etot = Eappl + Eex + Eanis + Em Eappl is the Zeeman energy related to the spin alignment in the external magnetic film H. Eappl = - m0 M . H Eex is the interatomic exchange interaction favoring parallel atomic moments alignment (short range). Eex = -(1/V) ij Jij Si . Sj (ij is over the nearest neighbors and V is the unit cell volume) Eanis is the magnetic anisotropy energy associated to preferential magnetization directions. Eanis = -K1(n . M)2 For a preferential axes n : Em is the magnetostatic self-interaction due to the long-range magnetic dipolar coupling. Responsible for domain formation in bulk- and film-like specimens Em = -1/2 m0 Hd . M [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Anisotropy and domain structures. Magnetostatic energy is not the only ingredient to determine the actual domain structure. a) Anisotropy energy plays a role: y ? b) structure a) is expected with cubic anisotropy; structure b) with uniaxial anisotropy with EA along x; structure c) with uniaxial anisotropy with EA along y. x But still, what decides the number of subdivisions, for c) instance? Somwhere ther is also Exchange energy stored. Where? [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Domain boundaries Bloch domain wall Neél domain wall (thin films) w So to set up a domain structure and reduce the magnetostatic energy there is a price to pay: an excess of anisotropy and exchange energy has to be stored in the boundaried between domains, the domain walls (there is also some magnetostatic energy). s w AK1 Domain wall energy, per unit of surface: with A=nJS2/a, the exchange stiffness constant, where n is the number of sites in the unit cell, J is the average exchange integral value, S is the spin number and a is the unit cell edge. [A] = J/m Domain wall width: w A K1 [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Energies and widths of domain boundaries Nèel Threshold between Bloch and Nèel walls in a Fe film Bloch nm [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Energies and widths of domain boundaries (e) Threshold between Bloch and Nèel walls in a typical soft film (sligthly anysotropic) Bloch Nèel nm [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Magnetization reversal and domains Hext Hext = 0 Hext Ideally, reversal through domain walls motion does not cost energy because the wall energy necessary at the new position is released at the previous position (reversible). The annihilation of DWs costs energy, of course. In the case of domain wall pinning at local defects (non-magnetic impurities, voids, grain boundaries…) some activation energy is necessary to release the domain wall from the pinning centre (abrupt displacement, Barkhausen jumps, viscosity due to Lenz law, energy dissipation -> irreversible process -> hysteresis). [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Let’s see a “real” example Domain wall motion is the preferred way of changing the magnetization at low fields. With increasing field strength, first domain walls will move and increase the size of domains with a magnetization component parallel to the field (with the magnetization in every domain being parallel to an easy axis). Therefore some misalignment with the applied field remains if the field is not aligned with one of the easy axes. rotation (high fields) domain walls displacement (low fields) Barkhausen jumps At high fields the domain walls are removed and the magnetization is rotated coherently towards the field direction. [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Hysteresis due to magnetization rotation Stoner and Wohlfarth model: coherent rotation of an uniaxial particle uniformly magnetized. E = K1 sin2 - mMsHcosq Ms q H Easy axis Free energy for unit volume Ho 2 K1 mo M s [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Ferromagnetic nano-structures Ferromagnetic nano-structures offer a unique opportunity to investigate properties at length scales previously unattainable. Because intrinsic magnetic length-scales (e.g., exchange length or the domain wall thickness) are comparable to the sample size, novel physical properties can be expected, respect to bulk- and film-like materials. Surface effects become relevant (dominant). Novel physical properties can be expected with respect to bulk- and film-like materials (e.g., completely different magnetization reversal mechanism). [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Applications This field has attracted much attention because of its close ties to potential technological applications. • Nonvolatile Magnetic Random Access Memories (MRAM). • Periodic bi-dimensional arrays of magnetic dots for future high density magnetic storage media (1 Tbit/in2). • Magnetoelectronic devices with new functionalities (sensors). A key issue for such applications is to understand and control the magnetic switching of small magnetic elements. [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Scale length parameters The relative strength of the anisotropy and magnetostatic (1/2m Ms2) energies (per unit volume) can be expressed by the dimensionless parameter: k = 2K1/mMs2. k provides a quantitative definition of the conventional distinction between soft ( k <<1, i.e., dipolar effects dominate over anisotropy ones) and hard ( k >1) materials. The competition between exchange and dipolar energy is expressed in terms of the exchange length: lex = 2 A m0 M s2 The comparison between exchange and anisotropy may be expressed through the length: lw = A K1 lex k DW width Fe Co Ni Py A (J/m) 2110-12 3010-12 910-12 1310-12 Ms (A/m) 1.7106 1.42106 0.49106 0.86106 K (J/m3) 48103 520103 -5.7103 0 lex (nm) 3.4 4.9 7.5 5.3 lw (nm) 20.9 7.6 39.7 k (adim.) 2.610-2 4.210-1 3.710-2 0 [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu From 3D to 2D (infinite) Etot = Eappl + Eexc + Eanis + Em n •M>0 unfavoured + + + + Hd = - M M - favoured - - - n•M<0 M Hd = 0 “Real” 2D systems have a lateral finite size more favoured [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Magnetostatic effects due to shape. For uniformly magnetized bodies • M = 0 (M is uniform everywhere) so that magnetostatic energy depends only on surface magnetic charges n • M ≠ 0 → shape of the body) favoured Hd = 0 Hd = - M unfavoured Nz < Nx Hd,x = - Nx M Aspect ratio Hd,z < Hd,x unfavoured Elongated particles favoured Hd,z = - Nz M [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Demagnetizing tensor : shape anisotropy. The uniformity condition can be realized ONLY for isotropic ellipsoids and for such special cases Hd = -N M, where N is a tensor called demagnetizing tensor. Referring to the ellipsoid semi-axes the tensor becomes diagonal and Nx, Ny, Nz are called demagnetizing factors and Nx + Ny + Nz = 1. Magnetostatic self interaction for an ellipsoid (referring to the ellipsoid semi-axes ) Ed = 1/2 m(Nx Mx2 + Ny My2 + Nz Mz2). Uniaxial anisotropy y M Eanis = K1 sin2q q z K1 = 1/2 m Ms2 (Ny - Nz) [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Lateral confinement and single domain state Upon sufficient lateral confinement the size of a ferromagnet can become so small that not even a single domain wall can be accomodated inside the system. The magnetization configuration inside the ferromagnet can become a single domain (this concept will be defined more precisely later on). Size Multi-domains structure Single domain [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Single domain particles: the spherical case Domains are favourable from the point of view of magnetostatics (minimize dipolar energy) but they cost domain wall energy s w AK1 For a sphere of radius R of material with A and K1, by equating the energy of the single domain state with that of two domains, one gets that the critical radius below which the single domain state is energetically stable is: RSD = 36 AK1 m 0 M s2 For spherical particles one finds that RSD for Co is 70 nm, whereas for Fe is 15 nm, and for Ni 55 nm [“hard” magnetic particles (Co) are more stable than “soft” magnetic ones (Fe, Ni, Py)]. [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Too small !! If the size becomes too small (as for RSD for Co, Fe, and Ni) the magnetic moment of the single domain ferromagnet can fluctuate due to thermal energy: superparamagnetic limit. Size Single domain Superparamagnet [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Thermal stability of the remanent state: superparamagnetism Competition between thermal and magnetic (anisotrpy) energy: thermal activated reversal. This leads to a relaxation time at zero field (for uniaxial particle): t 1010 e K1V k BT K1 is the anisotropy constant V is the particle volume, kB the boltzmann’s constant and T the absolute temperature. t depends on the particle volume V: if the particle is too small it becomes unstable at room temperature -> superparamagnetic limit. E kBT K1V 0 p q [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Retarding the onset of superparamagnetism - Increase K1 as much as possible. - Larger aspect ratio retards the onset of superparamagnetism by adding “shape anisotropy” to the material intrinsic anisotropy. K1 = 1/2 m Ms2 (Ny - Nz) Shape anisotropy hard soft “Material” effect (K1) [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Lateral confinement and remanent state: summary Size effects Single Closure domains domain Superparamagnetic Shape effects Closure domains Single domain Aspect ratio effects Closure domains Single domain [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu A caveat about “single domain” state in confined systems The uniformity condition can be realized ONLY for isotropic ellipsoids. Real particles are never ellipsoids…..deviations from uniformity close to the edges. Flower state Leaf state In order to avoid these deviations from uniformity the size of the particle (cubic) should be: d ~ lex which is of a few nm for Co,Fe and Ni. [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu An interesting case: very soft material Fe20Ni80 Eg., a particle 10 nm thick and with lateral size below 700 nm could not accomodate even a domain wall. Nèel Bloch [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Soft nano-scale disk and rings: vortex state Magnetization configuration determined by magnetostatic and exchange energies (no anisotropy). Vortex core The energy is almost all due to exchange. Residual magnetostatic energy is confined in the core. The core is necessary to avoid the singularity in the in-plane magnetization curling. Systems developing vortes state configurations are interesting because of their reduced sensitivity to edge effects. Stabilization of the vortex state by removing the high energy core in a ring structure. Magnetic force microscopy image [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Incoherent vs. coherent reversal For single domain particles the reversal process can be still incoherent, in a way different from doman wall displacement: curling mode. reversal 2K1 moMs HN 2K1 moMs [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Magnetization revrsal is a dynamic process Coherent rotation accomplishes magnetization reversal much faster than inhomogeneous and domain walls displacement mechanisms. Magnetization rotation : 100 ps to 1 ns Domain walls displacement : 100 ns up to 100 ms E = - mB dJ G dt G = m× B m= -mBg J = - J dm Larmour precession (c = B) m B dt M motion is damped (a) damping my Low damping mx Magnetization reversal through coherent rotation takes place with magnetization precession (N.B., always counter-clockwise looking from +z). If the precession is effectively dumped the reversal can be very fast. my High damping torque mx [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu Damping and field dependance of the reversal of a magnetic moment t t m H Damping a 0.2 Damping a 0.05 t=0 m 1700 emu x (10nm)3 m 1700 emu x (10nm)3 H 5kOe : reversal time 646 ps H 5 kOe: reversal time 2121 ps H 500 Oe: reversal time 5950 ps H 500 Oe: reversal time 20481 ps 1.0 M x M x My My 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 -0.5 1.0 1.0 -0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 -1.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.0 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 M M z Mz z M x My 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.0 -0.5 Damping a 1.0 m 1700 emu x (10nm)3 H 5 kOe: reversal time 185 ps H 500 Oe: reversal time 1565 ps [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu References and further reading • S. Blundell, Magnetism in condensed matter, Oxford University Press, 2006. • A. Aharoni, Introduction to the theory of Ferromagnetism, University Press, Oxford 2000. • W. F. Brown, Micromagnetics, Wiley, New York 1963. • S. Chikazumi, Physics of Magnetism, Wiley, New York 1964. • M. Prutton, Thin ferromagnetic films, Butterworth &Co. (Publishers) Ltd., London 1964. [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu [email protected] I www.nanogune.eu