Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY Volume 5, Number 2, 2016 ª Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0067 Original Article Cardiac Mortality in Children and Adolescents with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Analysis Arya Amini, MD,1,* Blair Murphy, MD,1,2,* Carrye R. Cost, MD,3 Timothy P. Garrington, MD,3 Brian S. Greffe, MD,3 and Arthur K. Liu, MD, PhD1 Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of cardiac death in pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) survivors and identify high-risk groups that may need additional surveillance. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program database was queried to analyze the rates of radiation therapy (RT) use and cardiac-specific mortality (CSM) in HL patients, aged 0–21 years, treated from 1973 to 2007. Primary endpoint was cardiac mortality. Results: A total of 6552 patients were included. Median follow-up was 12 years (range, 0–40). Median age at diagnosis was 17 years (range, 0–21). The majority were white (85.5%), from western states (41.2%), had nodular sclerosis HL (73.2%), presented with stage I or II disease (51.5%), and received RT (56.1%). Death from cardiac disease occurred in 114 patients (9.2% of all deaths). CSM for the entire cohort at 10-, 20-, and 30year time points was 0.3%, 1.6%, and 5.0%, respectively. Median age at the time of cardiac death was 39 years (range, 18–58 years). Under multivariate analysis (MVA), adolescent patients (ages 13–21) had higher rates of CSM (hazard ratio [HR], 3.05; p = 0.005). Female gender (HR, 0.43; p < 0.001), patients treated from 1998 to 2007 (HR, 0.19; p = 0.018), and those with lymphocyte-rich histology (HR, 0.14; p = 0.047) had significantly lower rates of CSM. Use of RT was not associated with CSM under MVA (HR, 1.18, p = 0.452). Conclusion: The cumulative incidence of CSM in this population analysis of pediatric HL was 9.2%, with a steady decline over the past several decades. Adolescent patients at diagnosis and males were more likely to die of cardiac-related causes. Keywords: Hodgkin lymphoma, cardiotoxicity, pediatric, radiation therapy Introduction H odgkin’s lymphoma (HL) represents a success in the progress of pediatric cancer treatment. Current therapy regimens for children typically include a combination of multiagent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT). Outcomes overall for these children are very good, and for a majority of patients, the goal is to decrease therapy to minimize late toxicities. Multimodality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation are well-known risk factors for long-term cardiovascular mortality in adult survivors of childhood cancer.1–5 A large European analysis found significantly higher rates of cardiovascular mortality after childhood cancer treatment in people receiving a cumulative anthracycline dose greater than 360 mg/m2 and radiation doses greater than 5 Gy.5 Numerous other studies describe long-term cardiac toxicities, including myocardial infarction, decreased ventricular function, valvular disorders, and congestive heart failure.6–8 Efforts have been made to minimize the use of treatment modalities, in particular RT that puts survivors at risk for developing these long-term side effects later in life. We sought to expand these data by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program (SEER) database to evaluate the rate of cardiac mortality in the pediatric population. The goal of using this large population database was to potentially identify patient and treatment risk factors associated with higher rates of cardiac death. 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Department of Radiation Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. *These two authors contributed equally to this article. 2 3 181 182 Methods Patient selection The National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored SEER database, including 18 registries, was queried using SEER*Statv8.2.1 (seer.cancer.gov). A total of 8862 pediatric and adolescent patients, aged 0–21years, who were diagnosed with HL between 1973 and 2007 were initially selected. For inclusion, complete data on survival and receipt of RT were required. Patients included were coded as either receiving or not receiving external beam RT; unknowns were excluded (n = 341). A sensitivity analysis was performed categorizing patients with unknown RT as receiving RT and not receiving RT, with similar results. The cutoff year of 2007 was chosen to allow for a minimum 5-year follow-up. A total of 6552 patients met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics and treatment variables Patient variables included age, gender, race, census region, year of diagnosis, tumor histology, tumor stage, and receipt of external beam RT. Census region was coded as facility location and defined by SEER and categorized as West/ Alaska, East, Northern Plains, and Southwest. Stage designation was based on the Ann Arbor staging system. Receipt of chemotherapy was not included as SEER does not record this information. The primary endpoint of the study was cardiac-specific mortality (CSM). CSM was determined using cause-specific survival coded as diseases of the heart, which is inclusive of congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and other cardiomyopathies.9 Age at time of cardiac death was determined by adding the follow-up in years to the initial age at diagnosis. Percent rate of cardiac mortality for the study cohort was calculated by dividing the number of cardiac deaths by the total number of deaths for each time period (every 4-year increments). Statistical analyses All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS V22.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). CSM was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of death. CSM was first examined using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using CSM as the outcome with a significance level of p < 0.05. Two-sided pvalues and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. The following variables were included under multivariate analysis (MVA): age at diagnosis (0–12 vs. 13–21 years), gender, race, census region, year of diagnosis (1973–1977, 1978– 1987, 1988–1997, 1998–2007), histology, Ann Arbor stage (I/II vs. III/IV), and receipt of RT. Results Table 1 illustrates the baseline patient and treatment characteristics of 6552 individuals included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 12 years (range, 0–40 years). Median age at diagnosis was 17 years (range, 0–21 years). The majority were white (85.5%), were from western states (41.2%), had nodular sclerosis HL (73.2%), presented with stage I or II disease (51.5%), and received RT (56.1%). RT use in the study declined from 1973 to 2007 (73% of patients underwent AMINI ET AL. Table 1. Patient and Treatment Characteristics Characteristic Age (years) 0–12 13–21 Gender Male Female Race White African American Others Missing Census region West/Alaska East Northern Plains Southwest Year of diagnosis 1973–1977 1978–1987 1988–1997 1998–2007 Histology Nodular sclerosis Lymphocyte rich Lymphocyte depleted Mixed Nodular lymphocyte predominant NOS Staging I/II III/IV Missing Radiation No Yes All patients (No., %) 1002 (15.3) 5550 (84.7) 3386 (51.7) 3166 (48.3) 5605 623 278 46 (85.5) (9.5) (4.2) (0.7) 2698 1944 1322 588 (41.2) (29.7) (20.2) (9.0) 620 1290 1443 3199 (9.5) (19.7) (22.0) (48.8) 4793 201 67 721 176 594 (73.2) (3.1) (1.0) (11.0) (2.7) (9.1) 3373 (51.5) 1693 (25.8) 1486 (22.7) 2876 (43.9) 3676 (56.1) NOS, not otherwise specified. RT in the years 1973–1977 compared with 50% in the years 1998–2007). Rates of cardiac mortality (divided by all deaths) declined from 1973 to 2007, with cardiac death rates of 14% in patients treated from 1973 to 1977 compared with 1% in patients treated from 2003 to 2007 (Fig. 1). At the time of this analysis, 1240 patients had died (18.9%); of the 1240 deaths, 114 were cardiac related (9.2%), 716 were due to HL (57.7%), and 410 were from other causes (33.1%). CSM for the entire cohort at 10-, 20-, and 30-year time points was 0.3%, 1.6%, and 5.0%, respectively. Median age at the time of cardiac death was 39 years (range, 18–58 years). In univariate analysis (UVA), predictors for higher rates of CSM included those patients who were adolescents at diagnosis (13–21 vs. 0–12 years) ( p = 0.007) (Fig. 2A). Under UVA, predictors for lower rates of CSM included female gender ( p = 0.001) (Fig. 2B) and year of treatment, including 1988–1997 ( p = 0.012) and 1998–2007 ( p = 0.006). Under MVA, patients who were adolescents at diagnosis had higher rates of CSM (hazard ratio [HR], 3.05; p = 0.005). Female gender (HR, 0.43; p < 0.001), patients treated from 1998 to CARDIAC MORTALITY IN PEDIATRIC HODGKIN’S LYMPHOMA FIG. 1. Percent rate of cardiac mortality for the study cohort from 1973 to 2007 queried from the SEER database. Values were calculated by dividing the number of cardiac deaths by the total number of deaths for each time period (4year increments). 2007 (HR, 0.19; p = 0.018), and those with lymphocyte-rich histology (HR, 0.14; p = 0.047) had significantly lower rates of CSM. Use of RT was not associated with CSM under MVA (HR, 1.18, p = 0.452) (Table 2). On subset analysis, RT was not associated with CSM in patients treated from 1973 to 1987 (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.81–2.14; p = 0.273) or 1988 to 2007 (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.29–2.19; p = 0.656) under MVA. Discussion Treatment-associated cardiovascular toxicity is of significant clinical importance in pediatric HL given the high survival rates. The leading cause of noncancer mortality in HL is cardiovascular disease.10 Well-described treatment risk factors include RT treatment, especially at doses >30 Gy, dose per fraction, volume of heart in the RT field, and use of chemotherapy, including anthracyclines.7,11,12 The incidence of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity ranges from 4% to 36% depending on cumulative dose and age at treatment.7,13 Previous studies demonstrated that RT-induced cardiotoxicity contributes to 2%–5% of overall mortality in patients with HL FIG. 2. 183 and includes coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic heart failure (CHF), valvular disease, arrhythmias, and myocardial infarction.6,7,14–16 One study evaluating the rates of CAD on CT angiography in pediatric HL patients found the risk of coronary artery abnormalities to be 16% in the first 10 years after definitive treatment; the risk was 6.8 times higher in patients receiving mediastinal RT, especially >20 Gy.17 Furthermore, the combination of both RT and anthracyclines can compound these risks when compared with treatment with RT or chemotherapy alone.18 For example, one study found that the addition of anthracyclines caused a significant increase in CHF (HR, 2.81) and valvular disorders (HR, 2.10) in HL patients undergoing mediastinal radiotherapy; the cumulative rate of CHF after multimodality treatment was 7.9%.6 To our knowledge, our SEER analysis is the first populationbased longitudinal evaluation of CSM for pediatric and adolescent HL patients. The results demonstrate a gradual decline in cardiac mortality for pediatric and adolescent HL since 1973. Cumulative incidence of CSM at 30-year follow-up was 5.0% consistent with other reports.3 The median age of cardiac mortality in this study was 39 years (*22 years after their initial diagnosis and treatment). Data from this study support a recent publication by Al-Kindi et al.,19 who queried the SEER database to evaluate rates of CSM in adults (ages 20–49 years) treated for HL. They demonstrated a similar drop in CSM, with a 5-year cumulative incidence decreasing from 1.17% in 1990 to 0.19% in 2006, in addition to showing higher rates of CSM in older patients and males. Male gender and older age at time of cancer treatment have also been demonstrated to be predictive factors for CSM in other studies as well.16,20,21 Somewhat surprisingly and discordant with the literature, RT was not found to correlate with CSM. However, the use of RT has decreased over time, along with a decrease in CSM. Conclusions assessing RT correlation with CSM in the SEER database can be difficult due to lack of information on RT field (i.e., inclusion of the heart within the treatment field) and total dose. Last, data from a recent study reviewing echocardiograms of childhood cancer survivors found similar results demonstrating no correlation between receipt of RT and echocardiographic abnormalities.22 The authors concluded that this was likely due to the lower median RT dose of their study population and that RT-associated valvular abnormalities may not have been captured as they may occur more than 20 years after treatment. Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrating cardiac-specific mortality by gender (A) and age group (B). 184 AMINI ET AL. Table 2. Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Predictors of Cardiac-Specific Mortality Univariate Variable Age (years) 0–12 13–21 Gender Male Female Race White African American Others Census region West/Alaska East Northern Plains Southwest Year of diagnosis 1973–1977 1978–1987 1988–1997 1998–2007 Histology Nodular sclerosis Lymphocyte rich Lymphocyte depleted Mixed Nodular lymphocyte predominant NOS Staging I/II III/IV Missing Radiation No Yes Multivariate HR 95% CI p HR 95% CI p 1 2.84 1.32–6.11 0.007 1 3.05 1.41–6.60 0.005 1 0.50 0.34–0.74 0.001 1 0.43 0.29–0.64 <0.001 1 1.07 0.95 0.52–2.19 0.30–3.01 0.86 0.934 1 1.14 1.30 0.55–2.36 0.40–4.22 0.734 0.665 1 1.12 0.91 0.81 0.70–1.80 0.57–1.46 0.42–1.56 0.645 0.700 0.534 1 1.16 0.89 0.84 0.71–1.89 0.55–1.44 0.43–1.62 0.549 0.624 0.593 1 0.93 0.42 0.17 0.60–1.44 0.21–0.83 0.05–0.61 0.747 0.012 0.006 1 0.91 0.50 0.19 0.56–1.46 0.21–1.19 0.05–0.75 0.686 0.116 0.018 1 0.16 0.56 0.91 2.30 0.82 0.02–1.16 0.08–4.00 0.54–1.53 0.72–7.32 0.42–1.60 0.070 0.559 0.715 0.159 0.565 1 0.14 0.43 0.79 2.16 0.70 0.02–0.98 0.06–3.11 0.46–1.35 0.67–7.00 0.35–1.40 0.047 0.402 0.384 0.199 0.314 1 0.80 1.83 0.37–1.73 1.10–3.04 0.575 0.019 1 0.76 1.27 0.35–1.66 0.69–2.34 0.496 0.448 1 1.26 0.83–1.92 0.280 1 1.18 0.77–1.82 0.452 CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. However, the study did find that patients receiving anthracycline doses q250 mg/m2 had significantly higher rates of persistent echocardiographic abnormalities. Data presented in this study demonstrate that adolescent males diagnosed with having HL are at highest risk for cardiac mortality. There may be several reasons, including treatment differences and lifestyle factors between the groups. A recent study evaluating metabolic health risk factors in childhood cancer survivors found that males and adolescent young adults were more likely to have hypertension, obesity, and elevated transaminases; participants in the study with all three risk factors present were males who were in the 18–34 age group.23 Lifestyle factors, including smoking, inactivity leading to obesity, and hypertension, were thought to be more prevalent in the older age group and among males, which may be contributing to the findings observed in our study as well. Additional studies specific to HL survivors have also shown male gender to be an independent risk factor for developing CAD and myocardial infarction.6,16 It is less likely that treatment itself is contributing to our findings as guidelines for treatment have not significantly differed by gender and age group (pediatrics vs. adolescents). While close monitoring based on current cardiac screening guidelines for childhood and adolescent cancer survivors ought to be followed, our results suggest that adolescent males treated for HL are at exceptionally high risk and perhaps may benefit the most from cardiac screening exams and education on lifestyle modifications. The risk of CSM is known to be particularly high in cancer patients treated at younger ages.24 Incidences of CHF in longterm HL survivors have been shown to be 10-fold higher for those receiving treatment before the age of 40 and at followup after 20 years.4 The same study found these rates to be even higher in patients with a family history of heart disease. Similar to our study, the period 20 years after treatment appears to be when most cardiac events occur. A study, including HL patients treated in Britain, found that the relative risk of death from a myocardial infarction was twofold higher than the general population in years 1 through 14 after the start of treatment, fourfold higher during years 15 through 19, and remained significant during years 20 through 24 after the start CARDIAC MORTALITY IN PEDIATRIC HODGKIN’S LYMPHOMA of treatment.20 Particular attention therefore during the first 20 years post-treatment is critical and may extend to at least 30 years or more post-treatment, as one multi-institutional study found.3 Furthermore, models may be helpful in categorizing patients into cardiac risk categories based on age at time of treatment, gender, chemotherapy and radiation use, family history, and patient comorbidities. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS)-CHF is an available risk assessment tool to predict CHF in childhood cancer survivors, including treatment use (radiation, anthracyclines), gender, and age at diagnosis as measures of risk.2 These models can enable clinicians to better target high-risk patients. Given the unique characteristics of pediatric and adolescent patients, separate models may need to be tested for them. Additional factors that may be contributing to the decrease in the rate of CSM in this study are improvements in screening and early intervention for this high-risk population. Studies have demonstrated that several modifiable risk factors in adult survivors of childhood malignancies can significantly contribute to CSM, including hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, and smoking.1 This has led to better education on lifestyle modifications and use of pharmaceutical interventions when indicated. Furthermore, screening guidelines are now in place for high-risk childhood cancer survivors. The current NCCN guidelines suggest a stress test/echocardiogram at 10-year intervals after RT is completed.25 The Children’s Oncology Group (COG) long-term follow-up guidelines established cardiovascular screening recommendations in survivors of childhood cancer. These guidelines suggest baseline electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. Patients who receive mediastinal radiation with or without anthracyclines should be closely followed by annual physical exams and every 1–2-year echocardiograms with fasting blood glucose and lipid profiles.26,27 The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) also provides a similar list of recommendations to screen for chemotherapy and radiation-induced heart disease.7 While RT was not found to impact cardiac mortality in this analysis, we expect the potential contribution of RT to cardiac toxicity to continue to decrease as the treatment paradigm for HL continues to evolve. For example, over the past several decades, RT doses and treatment fields have significantly decreased. The transition from high-dose extendedfield RT to involved-field RT and more recently involved nodal radiotherapy, which covers only postchemotherapy treatment nodal volumes, has substantially reduced cardiac dose by as much as 50%.28,29 In addition, response-adapted RT identifying a select group of patients who may not need additional RT after chemotherapy is currently underway in multiple studies and may further reduce rates of RT-induced cardiac mortality.30 Our study has several limitations. SEER does not contain certain patient and treatment characteristics, including smoking status, alcohol consumption, body–mass index, and other associated medical conditions (e.g., lung disease), all of which are potential confounders for our results. RT total dose, fraction size, and treatment site were unknown and therefore conclusions on RT use and CSM cannot be made from this study. Additionally, we could not account for anthracyclineinduced cardiotoxicity, which is known to correlate with cardiac mortality. Several studies, including one from Princess Margaret Hospital, demonstrated a strong association between cardiac toxicity and cumulative anthracycline dose 185 received.18,31 Anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens are known to independently contribute to cardiotoxicity, including decreased left ventricular function, arrhythmias, valvular disorders, and congestive heart failure.6 Therefore, given the findings in this SEER analysis, it is very likely that anthracycline use and total dose are contributing to CSM. Because the SEER database combines ischemic disease, cardiomyopathy, and myocardial infarction into one category called diseases of the heart, we were unable to differentiate between the different types of events. Last, the low rate of cardiac mortality in the last 10 years demonstrated in Figure 1 may also be related to limited follow-up. While it is likely these numbers would increase with longer follow-up, the downtrend in cardiac death is noteworthy in patients diagnosed and treated over 20 years ago. In summary, the cumulative incidence of CSM in this large population analysis of pediatric and adolescent HL was 9.2%, with a steady decline over the past several decades. While routine cardiac screening should continue to be performed for childhood cancer survivors, males and patients who were adolescents at the time of diagnosis may be at particularly higher risk for long-term cardiac mortality as demonstrated in our study. In conclusion, cardiac mortality rates appear to be decreasing and will likely continue due to improved awareness on lifestyle modifications and routine cardiac surveillance for childhood and adolescent cancer survivors. Author Disclosure Statement No competing financial interests exist. References 1. Armstrong GT, Oeffinger KC, Chen Y, et al. Modifiable risk factors and major cardiac events among adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(29):3673–3680. 2. Chow EJ, Chen Y, Kremer LC, et al. Individual prediction of heart failure among childhood cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(5):394–402. 3. Mulrooney DA, Yeazel MW, Kawashima T, et al. Cardiac outcomes in a cohort of adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: retrospective analysis of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. BMJ. 2009;339:b4606. 4. Andersson A, Naslund U, Tavelin B, et al. Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors— retrospective cohort analyses and a concept for prospective intervention. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(8):1914–1917. 5. Tukenova M, Guibout C, Oberlin O, et al. Role of cancer treatment in long-term overall and cardiovascular mortality after childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(8):1308–1315. 6. Aleman BM, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, De Bruin ML, et al. Late cardiotoxicity after treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2007;109(5):1878–1886. 7. Bovelli D, Plataniotis G, Roila F. Cardiotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy-related heart disease: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2010; 21(Suppl 5):v277–v282. 8. Busia A, Laffranchi A, Viviani S, et al. Cardiopulmonary toxicity of different chemoradiotherapy combined regimens for Hodgkin’s disease. Anticancer Res. 2010;30(10):4381–4387. 9. SEER Cause of Death Recode 1969+ (04/16/12). Accessed January 29, 2016 from: http://seer.cancer.gov/codrecode/ 1969+_d04162012/index.html. 186 10. Ng AK. Review of the cardiac long-term effects of therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2011;154(1):23–31. 11. Kupeli S. Risks and diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(7): 555–561. 12. van Nimwegen FA, Schaapveld M, Cutter DJ, et al. Radiation dose-response relationship for risk of coronary heart disease in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;34(3):235–243. 13. Lipshultz SE, Lipsitz SR, Sallan SE, et al. Chronic progressive cardiac dysfunction years after doxorubicin therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(12):2629–2636. 14. Hodgson DC. Late effects in the era of modern therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011;2011:323–329. 15. Milano MT, Li H, Gail MH, et al. Long-term survival among patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma who developed breast cancer: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(34):5088–5096. 16. Hull MC, Morris CG, Pepine CJ, et al. Valvular dysfunction and carotid, subclavian, and coronary artery disease in survivors of hodgkin lymphoma treated with radiation therapy. JAMA. 2003;290(21):2831–2837. 17. Kupeli S, Hazirolan T, Varan A, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography angiography in patients treated for childhood Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(6):1025–1030. 18. Myrehaug S, Pintilie M, Tsang R, et al. Cardiac morbidity following modern treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma: supraadditive cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin and radiation therapy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49(8):1486–1493. 19. Al-Kindi SG, Abu-Zeinah GF, Kim CH, et al. Trends and disparities in cardiovascular mortality among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015; 15(12):748–752. 20. Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Smith P, et al. Myocardial infarction mortality risk after treatment for Hodgkin disease: a collaborative British cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(3):206–214. 21. Pugh TJ, Ballonoff A, Rusthoven KE, et al. Cardiac mortality in patients with stage I and II diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with and without radiation: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3):845–849. 22. Ramjaun A, AlDuhaiby E, Ahmed S, et al. Echocardiographic detection of cardiac dysfunction in childhood cancer AMINI ET AL. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. survivors: how long is screening required? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62(12):2197–2203. Gunn HM, Emilsson H, Gabriel M, et al. Metabolic health in childhood cancer survivors: a longitudinal study in a long-term follow-up clinic. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2015 5(1):24–30. Adams MJ, Lipsitz SR, Colan SD, et al. Cardiovascular status in long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease treated with chest radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(15):3139–3148. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines, Hodgkin Lymphoma. Accessed December 1, 2015 from: www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/hodgkins.pdf Ragde H, Korb LJ, Elgamal AA, et al. Modern prostate brachytherapy. Prostate specific antigen results in 219 patients with up to 12 years of observed follow-up. Cancer. 2000;89(1):135–141. Shankar SM, Marina N, Hudson MM, et al. Monitoring for cardiovascular disease in survivors of childhood cancer: report from the Cardiovascular Disease Task Force of the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatrics. 2008;121(2):e387–e396. Weber DC, Peguret N, Dipasquale G, et al. Involved-node and involved-field volumetric modulated arc vs. fixed beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy for female patients with early-stage supra-diaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma: a comparative planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75(5):1578–1586. Koeck J, Abo-Madyan Y, Lohr F, et al. Radiotherapy for early mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma according to the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG): the roles of intensitymodulated radiotherapy and involved-node radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(1):268–276. Mauz-Korholz C, Metzger ML, Kelly KM, et al. Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(27):2975–2985. Miller TP, Dahlberg S, Cassady JR, et al. Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(1):21–26. Address correspondence to: Arthur K. Liu, MD, PhD Department of Radiation Oncology University of Colorado School of Medicine 1665 Aurora Court Room 1032 Aurora, CO 80045 Email: [email protected]