Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
From Ritmico Journal No 94 March 2013 From Ritmico Journal 94 March 2013 W. Dean Sutcliffe: The Sociable Muse – Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven and Friends IRMTNZ Conference 2013, Auckland – Music in Time By Dianne James The Sociable Muse: Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven and Friends convincingly how this, and related stylistic changes, are bound up with the novel approach describing music as a language reflected in many theoretical writings of the period. The idea of music as language gradually gained traction throughout this period. Language, of course, implies an awareness of communication, and successful communication relies on an intelligible organisation of one’s thoughts – words are ordered into sentences; sentences are ordered into paragraphs. Sutcliffe proposed that the th music of the later 18 century reveals an awareness of ‘sociability’ in its attempt to be more easily understood. There are two aspects to this term: firstly, it suggests a certain emotional tone, in particular sociable attributes such as reciprocity, politeness, decorum, exchange, friendliness, pleasantness, goodwill, graciousness, wit and humour. “[Sociability] is”, he says, “a means of mediating between individual and collective consciousness. It implies social awareness in a group situation, a feeling of give and take, a desire not to impose oneself too strongly, and awareness of others and of other points of view. The emphasis is on human deportment rather than self-expression.” Dean Sutcliffe Dean Sutcliffe’s thought-provoking presentation provided fresh perspectives on factors informing the interpretation of late 18thcentury music. The stimulating ideas he shared should assist us as we shape our own and students’ interpretations of this music for performance. He explored the idea of ‘expression’ and what it means when applied to music and musical performance generally, and then teased out the expressive qualities of the so-called classical style of the late 18th century in an attempt to uncover the distinctive flavour of this particular repertoire. The stylistic differences between music of the so-called Baroque and Classical periods are well known: shorter phrases, simpler harmonies, melody and accompaniment textures, less frequent use of counterpoint, stylistic variety and so on clearly distinguish the music of the classical period from general trends in the preceding style-period. The overriding feature of classical-period music is its simplicity, and Sutcliffe illustrated The second aspect of sociability can be found in the way music of this period is often organised. Musical phrases become much shorter and more defined, and there is often a conversational aspect. Individual movements might reveal a variety of styles and gestures, and the flow of the music is usually easier to grasp than the denser textures, and more continuous motion prevalent in earlier music. As already suggested, intelligibility was a key goal of later 18th-century music. Composers wanted their music to appeal to and be understood by a much wider range of listeners. Haydn himself expressed this conceit most succinctly when he said, “My language is understood all over the world.” Sutcliffe selected the finale from Haydn’s infamous ‘Joke’ Quartet Op.33 No.2 to illustrate these new ‘listener- friendly’ qualities. The movement is cast in rondo form, an extremely popular form at this time because of its very predictability: audiences knew what to expect. The theme is clearly constructed in four separate units, and its flavour is almost that of a limerick or nursery rhyme. (See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmoA5fy_kv Q) Having set all this in place, Haydn is From Ritmico Journal No 94 March 2013 The Sociable Muse: Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven and Friends subsequently able to confound the expectations of his audience: the final few bars keep us on our toes right to the very end. We are compelled to keep listening. This is, as Sutcliffe said, a revolutionary movement, revealing a new kind of consciousness on the composer’s part of the listener. Such interactions between a composer and listener are completely new, and are evidence of this new ‘sociability’. The best known example of those cited here though can be found in the finale of Mozart’s 2 Piano Sonata in F, K.332 (bars 218-245) . The simplifying cadence occurs from bar 230, where the grand, brilliant procedures of the previous bars seem to set up a strong and forthright conclusion. But Mozart’s continuation at 230 is coy, and brings with it a certain degree of irony, as he toys with the expectations of his listeners. Sutcliffe continued by discussing two commonly found patterns in the music of this period: the first he calls the gracious riposte; the second the simplifying cadence. The prevalence of these patterns is indicative of the way this sociable impulse penetrates to the core of late 18th-century music. The gracious riposte is connected with the emotional aspects of the music; it is linked with the idea of concession, of interaction, of giving “reciprocal pleasure” as Germaine de Staël wrote in Paris in 1784. Phrases in later 18thcentury music are often arranged in pairs, for example, with one self-contained idea, often assertive in nature, balanced by a softer, more conciliatory response. Sutcliffe illustrated this with the opening of Pleyel’s String Quartet in E 1 flat, Op.1 No.2. Bars 3 - 7 oppose bars 1-3 in almost every way: loud versus soft dynamic; rising versus falling profile; staccato/legato; unison/ homophonic; tutti/solo; mono-rhythmic/ differentiated rhythms. This is evidence of Sutcliffe’s gracious riposte, a technique of musical structure found right throughout this period, and into the early Beethoven period (see the opening bars of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata in C minor, Op.10 No.1). Dean Sutcliffe’s discussion of the sociable aspects of the music of the later 18th century is directly relevant to us as teachers as we seek to help our students shape their interpretations of this music. Very often students easily master the technical aspects of the music of this period, but their performances lack a sense of drama and communication, or any sense that they actually understand how the music is put together. By encouraging students to view late 18th-century music as a language, through which the composer is directly communicating with his listeners, we can perhaps help our students to get inside this music, so that they too can interact directly with the irony, wit and humour that lies at its heart, and communicate this to an engaged and interested audience. Dr Dianne James is a member of the IRMTNZ Council and IRMTNZ Auckland Branch. Her particular interest is in the music of Haydn and she has presented seminars to Auckland and Wellington Branches on teaching his music. She also contributes regularly to Radio NZ Concert programmes. She was recently made a Fellow of the Institute. Sutcliffe has coined the term simplifying cadence to describe a second recurrent pattern prevalent in much later 18th-century music. Cadences are much more frequent in the music of this period, and this is bound up, Sutcliffe believes, with this idea of accessibility. Various examples were drawn on – another string quartet excerpt by Pleyel, along with two by the Swedish composer Joseph Martin Kraus (1756-1792). 1 See The Sociable Muse handout 2 See The Sociable Muse handout