Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
F o & On r the P He co ract m log icing at is ol t og ist Volume 3, Number 3, 03.09 Reports and Insight for Community-Based Oncologists Highlights from the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium CellSearch Test Predicts Outcomes Better than Levels of PSA I Gonzalez-Angulo: Photo Courtesy © SABCS/Todd Buchanan 2008; CTC: Courtetsy Veridex LLC. Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo, MD, speaking at this year's SABCS. Page 18 n a February article in Lancet Oncology, researchers from Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York said that CellSearch, a device that measures circulating tumor cells (CTCs), is an effective way to track the response of castration-resistant prostate tumors to chemotherapy. CellSearch is manufactured by Veridex LLC, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, and it recently headed the Cleveland Clinic’s list of top medical innovations for 2009 (Oncology & Biotech News, Jan., p. 31). In 2008, the FDA expanded approval of CellSearch to include monitoring of patients with metastatic prostate cancer, adding to its earlier approvals for patients with metastatic breast or colorectal cancers. (Continued on page 16) With a Special Report on Aromatase Inhibitors T he 31st Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) took place December 1014, 2008, in Texas. Research teams from around the globe presented more than 6000 abstracts and posters. Attendees received updated data from several major studies, including the BIG (Breast International Group) 1-98, NOAH (Neoadjuvant Herceptin), ZO-FAST (ZometaFemara Adjuvant Synergy Trial), and TEAM (Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter) trials. The symposium featured important research on novel and existing breast cancer treatments, innovative diagnostic techniques, and newly discovered biomarkers. The following summary highlights some of the more significant research presented at the conference. Additional coverage can be found on pages 8-15 and in our regular departments. Women with Dense Breast Tissue Face Higher Cancer Risks Dense breast tissue as measured by mammography is the primary risk factor for breast cancer development, next to age. Nearly 10% of women have dense breasts, and studies suggest that women with highly dense breasts (≥60%-75% dense tissue) are 6 times more likely to develop breast cancer than women whose breasts consist — by Christin Melton primarily of fatty tissue. Researchers continue to investigate the association between breast density and cancer and look for ways of mitigating cancer risk in these women. Study analyzes breast tissue composition A group of Mayo Clinic researchers evaluated samples of breast tissue from 60 volunteers, aged 40-85 years. Inclusion criteria included no symptoms of breast cancer, a normal mammogram within 6 months of study onset, and no personal history of breast cancer. Women receiving endocrine therapy or those who had breast-related symptoms or bleeding tendencies were excluded. Investigators used ultrasonographyguided core-needle biopsy to obtain tissue samples from dense and non-dense areas of the breast from each participant. Next, they determined the percentage of epithelium tissue, stroma (connective tissue), and fat content in each sample. The authors said their study was the first to analyze both types of tissue taken from the same breast. Karthik Ghosh, MD, breast cancer researcher and physician with the Mayo Clinic, led the research team. Dr. Ghosh said they “found Inside: 8 S ABCS Special Report: Aromatase Inhibitors 16 In the News 18 Clinical Trial Reports 20 R eimbursement and a dramatic difference in tissue composition between dense and non-dense tissue in the breast.” Consistent with earlier studies, preliminary results from 34 patients showed that dense tissue contained much higher concentrations of epithelium and stroma but less fat than tissue samples from less-dense areas of the breast. “This shows us that both the epithelium and stroma contribute to density and suggests that the large difference in stroma content in dense breast tissue may play a significant role in breast cancer risk,” Dr. Ghosh explained. Area Sampled Epithelium, Stroma, % % Fat, % Dense 6 64 30 Non-dense 1 20 80 Researchers also noted more lobular involution in non-dense tissue. Lobular involution refers to a decrease in the size and number of milk ducts. This lobular regression typically accelerates with age and is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. (Continued on page 12) Check us out online at www.HCPLive.com/ OBTNLive Coming Soon: S P E C I A L * A S C O * I S S u E Volume 3, Number 7, 07.09 RepORtS And InSIgH t fOR COMMunIty-B ASed OnCOlOgIStS Managed Care News ™ 23 Part of the Healthcare Professionals Network www.HCPLive.com/OBTNLive 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Highlights The Latest Advanc es in Cancer Resear ch ASCO Highlights 8 Breast Cancer 13 Lung Cancer 18 Prostate Cance r 23 Lymphomas 28 Leukemias 33 Gynecologic Cance r 38 Gastrointestinal Cancer 43 Myelodysplastic S Oncology & Biotech News | 03.09 INTHENEWS Zoledronic Acid Improves Response in Breast Tumors juvant therapy with zoledronic acid plus stanZoledronic acid (Zometa) and other bisphosdard chemotherapy shrinks malignant tumors. phonates are generally used in cancer therapy This could help some women avoid mastectomy to mitigate the likelihood of bone problems, and opt for less radical surgical procedures. such as loss of bone mineral density and fracThe multinational trial enrolled 3360 pre- and tures. Two recent studies have determined postmenopausal women from 7 countries with that adding zoledronic acid to some existing early stage breast cancer. The retrospective analbreast cancer regimens may improve diseaseysis looked at a subset of 205 patients who refree survival. ceived standard chemotherapy alone (n = 104) or The Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer combined with zoledronic acid 4 mg IV every 3 to Study Group (ABCSG)-12 enrolled 1803 pre4 weeks for 6 months (n = 101) prior to surgery. menopausal women with ER+ early breast Patients’ baseline characteristics were similar becancer. Following surgery, patients were rantween the cohorts, and both groups underwent the domized to receive goserelin (Zoladex) 3.6 mg same median number of chemotherapy cycles. subcutaneously every 28 days along with oral Adjusted mean tumor size after treatment tamoxifen 20 mg per day or anastrozole (Arimiwas 28.2 mm in the zoledronic acid group and dex) 1 mg per day for 3 years. A subset of pa42.4 mm in the chemotherapy group. Researchtients also received zoledronic acid 4 mg intraers classified this 33% reduction as “significant.” venous (IV) every 6 months. Pathological complete response was seen in In the February issue of New England Journal of 10.9% of women in the zoledronic acid group Medicine, investigators reported that the group compared with 5.8% in the chemotherapy group receiving adjuvant therapy with zoledronic acid (P = .033). Investigators said the addition of zoleand anastrozole had a 36% reduced risk of disdronic acid to standard ease progression comchemotherapy allowed pared with endocrine 16% of women in this monotherapy (P = .01) “These results support a potential group to forego masand a 35% reduction in risk of recurrence (P = anti-tumor benefit of combining Zometa tectomy for less radi.02). Michael Gnant, with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant cal procedures; the mastectomy rates were MD, Medical Univertreatment of breast cancer.” 65.3% in the zoledronic sity of Vienna, Austria, acid group compared and colleagues said –Matthew Winter, MD with 77.9% for the chethe combined regimen motherapy arm. produced no benefit in Lead author Matthew Winter, MBChB, MSc, overall survival, and toxicities were consistent clinical research fellow, University of Sheffield, with the agents’ known safety profiles. ResearchUK, said, “These results support a potential ers quantified the number needed to treat with anti-tumor benefit of combining Zometa with zoledronic acid to prevent progression as 31, chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment which they indicated was “consistent with the of breast cancer.” AZURE investigators hope number needed to treat for cancer therapies to present final results from the trial in 2 to that in the past have caused a shift in treatment 3 years. Robert E. Coleman, MD, also of Unistandards.” versity of Sheffield, cautioned that this was a Preclinical and earlier-phase studies found “hypothesis-generating study,” not a “practicethat zoledronic acid acts directly on tumor changing” one. cells. It inhibits cell adhesion, spread, and proBoth trials were funded in part by Novartis, liferation; induces apoptosis; acts synergistithe manufacturer of Zometa. Dr. Coleman precally with chemotherapy; and exerts antiangiodicted that if the preliminary findings from the genic effects. AZURE trial hold up, Novartis will likely file for The second study, a retrospective analysis of a new indication for the drug. data from the AZURE (Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid to Reduce Recurrence) trial, showed that neoad–Christin Melton News Capsules Cases of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, rose 3.1% annually from 1992-2004 in the United States. (Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Jan. 2009) Radiotherapy before tumor excision reduced rectal cancer recurrence by 5.6%. (Lancet, Mar. 2009) Meta-analysis finds 2 alcoholic drinks a day may boost pancreatic cancer risk by 22%. (Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, Mar. 2009) Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging is more sensitive than mammography at detecting invasive lobular breast carcinoma. (American Journal of Roentgenology, Feb. 2009) FLT PET scanning, which uses radioactive fluorothymidine tracer, may indicate a patient’s response to chemotherapy as early as the day after treatment. (University of Wisconsin Madison, Mar. 2009) HPV 16 and HPV 18 are the most prevalent genotypes of human papillomavirus associated with invasive cervical cancer, accounting for 70% of cases. (International Journal of Cancer, Feb. 2009) Almost all patients with epidermolysis bullosa (subtype Hallopeau-Siemens) will develop squamous cell carcinoma by age 55. (Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Feb. 2009) CellSearch Predicts Outcomes (Continued from cover) In the initial stages of advancing prostate cancer, patients are treated with hormonal therapies and oncologists measure PSA levels to evaluate response. An increasing PSA level typically correlates to tumor growth or spread. Other factors can influence PSA levels, however, including commonly used medications like statins and aspirin (Oncology & Biotech News, Jan., p. 24), compromising the reliability of PSA testing. Once a patient with castration-resistant prostate cancer initiates chemotherapy, PSA levels become even less reliable at indicating progression, making it hard to identify which patients are benefitting from therapy. Enter CellSearch. A sample of the patient’s blood is treated with CTC-seeking antibodies fused to microscopic iron balls. The fused particles affix themselves to CTCs, which are then drawn from the sample using a powerful magnet. The CTCs are stained to enhance identification, analyzed, and tallied. CellSearch makers say the system can identify a single cancer cell out of 40 billion blood cells in a 7.5 mL blood sample. Several studies have concluded that serial monitoring of CTCs in cancer patients effectively predicts PFS and overall survival. Sloan Kettering researchers enrolled 164 men with prostate cancer who were beginning first-line chemotherapy. They used CellSearch to ascertain CTC numbers before and after treatment. They also documented PSA and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at baseline and measured PSA levels during treatment. The risk of death was greater for patients with high baseline CTC counts or PSA levels. Tests at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting treatment found that the CTC count continued to correlate strongly with mortality risk but the PSA level became less reliable. Investigators concluded that a baseline CTC count accurately predicts survival for patients with prostate cancer just starting chemotherapy and effectively indicates response to treatment. They said CellSearch was a more reliable indicator of response than PSA both pre- and posttreatment. They noted, however, that the most accurate model at predicting survival included baseline CTC count and LDH levels in conjunction with treatment-related changes in CTC count. Researchers are accruing more than 1100 men with prostate cancer for a larger study to confirm these findings. The study adds support to results from a Nevada Cancer Institute trial published last year that found a decrease in CTCs was “most often associated with patients successfully responding to therapy.” Data from this trial found that a baseline measurement <5 CTCs correlated significantly to better survival rates versus >5 CTCs in patients with prostate cancer. –Christin Melton Courtetsy Veridex LLC 16 03.09 Earlier research found that a high ratio of HOXB13 to IL17BR gene expression (HOXB13: IL17BR) is strongly associated with poorer disease-free survival in women with ER+ breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. High expression of HOXB13:IL17BR may indicate impaired ER signaling, associated with tamoxifen resistance. A team of investigators from Sweden recently determined that HOXB13 protein expression alone is a significant predictor of response to tamoxifen and presented their findings at SABCS. They randomized 912 postmenopausal women with node-negative breast cancer to receive 2 years of tamoxifen monotherapy or no treatment. The subset of patients who remained recurrence-free after 2 years were then randomized to 3 years of tamoxifen monotherapy or no treatment. Investigators used the Theros Breast Cancer Index by bioTheranostics, a molecular testing firm in San Diego, California, to assess HOXB13 protein levels and determine the 2-gene ratio. Data on HOXB13 protein expression were available for 866 patients. The majority of women were negative or low expressors. In this group, those treated with tamoxifen experienced a longer time to distant recurrence than untreated patients. The nearly one-third of patients with high or intermediate HOXB13 expression had similar rates of distant recurrence-free survival (RFS) regardless of whether they received tamoxifen therapy. No. of Patients (N = 866) Percentage Negative 291 33.6 Low 317 36.6 Intermediate 212 24.5 High 46 www.hcplive.com/obtnlive PharmaFocus HOXB13 Gene Predicts Tamoxifen Response HOXB13 Expression l 5.3 The researchers concluded that HOXB13 expression alone constituted a statistically significant indicator of which patients would benefit from tamoxifen, with high expressors deriving little to no benefit. The level of HOXB13 protein was not predictive of RFS in untreated patients. A second study, led by Matthew Goetz, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, in collaboration with bioTheranostics, sought to identify prognostic markers of distant breast cancer recurrence. Using the Theros Breast Cancer Index, investigators found that 25% of tumors had high expression of HOXB13:IL17BR and a 5-gene molecular grade index. This overexpression was associated with 3 times the likelihood of distant metastases compared with patients with low-risk genetic markers. Dr. Goetz said using the Theros Breast Cancer Index to evaluate both molecular biomarkers might help identify patients with early stage breast cancer at high risk of distant metastases if treated with tamoxifen. These patients might benefit from treatment with other therapies, such as aromatase inhibitors. –Christin Melton Avastin (Bevacizumab) Avastin is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody specific for VEGF. It is the first FDA-approved biologic agent designed to slow or halt tumor growth through the initiation of angiogenesis. Avastin binds to VEGF, preventing VEGF receptor binding and subsequently disrupting VEGF activity. It is used in treating a variety of solid tumors and off-label in select noncancerous ocular diseases. Avastin is administered intravenously, in conjunction with a prescribed chemotherapy regimen. Although Avastin is generally well tolerated by most patients, it is associated with an increased risk of hypertension, proteinuria (protein in the urine), gastrointestinal perforation, and delayed wound healing. Currently more than 450 clinical trials worldwide are investigating Avastin in at least 30 types of solid tumors. Current Indications • C ombined with IFL chemotherapy in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer—2004 • Combined with IFL chemotherapy in second-line metastatic colorectal cancer—2006 • Combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—2006 • Accelerated approval in combination with paclitaxel as a treatment for first-line HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC)—2008 Pending FDA Approval Metastatic renal cell carcinoma—In the third quarter of 2008, Genentech Inc filed a supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) with the FDA requesting approval for Avastin as a first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in combination with interferon alfa 2-a. A decision is expected in August 2009. Persistent or recurrent cervical cancer—A phase II study by Monk, et al, published in the March 2009 issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology concluded that Avastin was “well tolerated and active” as a secondor third-line treatment in women with previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Investigators recommended proceeding with a phase III study of Avastin for this indication. Glioblastoma multiforme—Genentech based its sBLA for Avastin in glioblastoma on the results of a phase II trial involving patients with recurrent, treatment–refractory glioblastoma. This tumor has a high rate of VEGF expression, and patients have few options for treatment. A regimen combining Avastin with irinotecan produced PFS ≥6 months in more than half of patients. Surprisingly, patients who received Avastin monotherapy had greater overall survival—a median of 9.2 months versus 8.7 for the combination arm. The trial is now in phase III. Glioblastoma—In November 2008, the FDA granted Priority Review to Genentech’s sBLA for Avastin in patients with previously treated glioblastoma. Glioblastoma is a particularly aggressive brain cancer; patients with this diagnosis have a poor prognosis, with median survival averaging 3 to 6 months. Priority Review is granted to agents expected to provide “significant improvement compared to (already) marketed products.” A decision is expected in May 2009. NSCLC—In February, Genentech reported that Avastin combined with erlotinib (Tarceva) was effective maintenance therapy in previously treated patients with recurrent NSCLC who had achieved stable disease on a regimen of Avastin and chemotherapy. The phase III trial was halted early after a monitoring board found the drug duo significantly extended PFS versus Avastin monotherapy. Trial News Latest News HER2- locally recurrent or mBC—Three phase III studies (AVADO, E2100, and RIBBON-1) established that Avastin, in combination with various approved agents, enhances treatment in women with this disease. When Avastin was added to the agents used in each study, patients in the Avastin-containing arms experienced significantly longer PFS, greater tumor shrinkage, and acceptable toxicity. Genentech says it will use data from the AVADO and RIBBON-1 studies to petition the FDA this year to convert its accelerated approval of Avastin as a first-line treatment for HER2- mBC into full approval. Canada approved this indication in February 2009. In addition, the company plans to discuss data from the ATLAS study with the FDA to determine its next steps. Recent Avastin Trials Trial Indication Treatment Results ATLAS (N = 1157) Maintenance therapy for advanced NSCLC Avastin + erlotinib vs Avastin alone Patients in the combination arm had significantly longer PFS and no new safety signals. AVADO (N = 736) Inoperable HER2- locally recurrent or mBC Avastin 7.5 or 15 mg/kg + docetaxel vs docetaxel alone Avastin regimen significantly improved PFS and response rate. BRAIN (N = 167) Previously treated glioblastoma multiforme Avastin + irinotecan vs Avastin alone Both regimens showed high rates of response and PFS ≥6 months; OS was superior with Avastin monotherapy. GOG Study (N = 46) Persistent or recurrent cervical cancer Avastin 15 mg/kg every 21 days Primary end points: PFS at 6 months, toxicity. Median response was 6.21 months, and 11 patients had PFS ≥6 months. E2100 (N = 772) Untreated locally recurrent or mBC Avastin + paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone Independent review of results found patients in the combination group had a 52% reduction in risk of progression or death. RIBBON-1 (N = 1237) First-line metastatic HER2- mBC Avastin + taxane/anthracycline/ capecitabine vs taxane/ anthracycline/capecitabine alone Study met its end point of significantly increasing PFS in all Avastin arms vs placebo. GOG indicates Gynecologic Oncology Group; NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival. 17