* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Carter K 1 - Mrs. Anthony`s English 2
Copernican heliocentrism wikipedia , lookup
Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup
Spitzer Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Kepler (spacecraft) wikipedia , lookup
Nebular hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup
Space Interferometry Mission wikipedia , lookup
History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Planets beyond Neptune wikipedia , lookup
Directed panspermia wikipedia , lookup
Circumstellar habitable zone wikipedia , lookup
Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Fermi paradox wikipedia , lookup
Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Planets in astrology wikipedia , lookup
Dwarf planet wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Exoplanetology wikipedia , lookup
Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup
IAU definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Drake equation wikipedia , lookup
Planetary habitability wikipedia , lookup
Kruse 1 Carter Kruse Mrs. Anthony English 2 Honors 9, January 2017 Probability That Extraterrestrials are Real, Higher than You Think The Universe, it is ever expanding since the beginning of time. About 13.7 billion years ago is when the Big Bang, the beginning of the Universe, occurred. Since the Universe has no end, it is therefore infinite. That does not mean that there are an infinite amount of objects in that space. For example, a line goes on forever, but may only have one point. That is our universe, but with many more points. We have yet to fully understand it, but so far, our understanding gives us enough information to safely say, there is probable life elsewhere. How can there not be? Just a little common sense tells us so. For one, we know there is life, because Earth exists and almost everything on Earth is alive. There are nine major planets in our galaxy alone, including Pluto. There are an estimated 100 billion galaxies in the universe, and up to 400 billion stars just in the Milky Way Galaxy. That leaves about 99,999,999,999 galaxies left for the human race to discover. On Earth, the amino acid is the base of life. To get an amino acid, all you need is methane, water, ammonia, oxygen poor environment, and energy such as lighting. We know that the elements just listed are the base elements for other planets, all the other planets need is an oxygen poor environment and energy. They will then have amino acids, which are basis of life, which will in turn give that planet life. That may sound easy, and for the people that think it is, they say, “If life existed on other planets, we would have found it by now. Earth is the only planet capable of supporting life” (“Extraterrestrial”). That is false, and Julie Paque negates this is one sentence, “that does Kruse 2 not mean astronomers can find life with ease, however” (“Life”). With common sense we know Julie Paque is correct in that Astronomers have given more than enough evidence to support the probability of life. There is a one in 10 billion trillion chance that there is no other life, and in our galaxy alone, there is a one in 60 billion chance for life, and that is being conservative. There was an astronomer named Dr. Frank Drake, he developed an equation in 1961 to tell us the probability of intelligent life. The Equation is N=R*-fp-n-fl-fi-fc-L. N is the number of civilizations in the Milky Way, which give off detectable electromagnetic emissions. Meaning there may be life, because things like microwaves give off these types of emissions, as well as the sun and certain chemicals. R is the rate of formation of stars that are suitable for life. Fp is the fraction of stars with planetary systems. A planetary system is like what we have, planets orbiting the sun due to its gravitational pull, and the sun gives our planet life, which means it is giving those planets around it life as well. N is the number of planets per solar system that are suitable for life. Fl is the fraction of planets where life actually appears. Fi is the fraction of planets where intelligent life appears. Fc is the fraction of life that release detectable signs of life into space, space junk. Space junk is manmade debris, in this case extraterrestrial made debris that orbits the planet. L is the length of time those signals are released into space. This equation only estimates the number of technological civilizations in our galaxy. His calculations gave us the information that up to 3500 technologically advanced civilizations could exist in the Milky Way Galaxy. (Citation for this paragraph)?? The biggest factor in Drakes equation is L, time. L is the most important because, according to NASA, one fifth of the exoplanets, a planet that orbits a star/sun other than ours, are found in the habitable zone of their sun, which is a lot. That means that there may have been Kruse 3 more habitable planets than at the moment, say five million years ago. Which may give us evidence that life has existed, meaning that there is a 100% possibility that other life exists. From what I have read, I think the key to life are all the exoplanets, a planet that orbits a star / sun other than ours. Lonnie Shekhtman said that scientists “found loads of exoplanets” (Shekhtman). According to NASA one fifth of the exoplanets are found in the habitable zone of their sun. Those are just the planets of the moment, Eliminate all 1st and 3rd person (I, we, our, etc.) Dr. Frank Drake and Astronomer Woodruff Sullivan created a new equation, modeled after the first, for all of extraterrestrial life, not just technologically advanced. It is A=Nast-fbt. A is the number of technological species that have ever existed. Nast is the number of habitable planets in a volume of the universe. Fbt is the likelihood of a technological species arising on one of the planets. This new equation gave us the information that, “about 20 percent of all stars host planets in the life-friendly, "habitable zone," where liquid water could exist on a world's surface.”Cite There is one more equation, it was created in 2010 by Claudio Maccone. It is called the Statistical Drake Equation (SDE). It is much more complex than the classical drake equation (CDE). This equation is much more recent and reliable with the new information we have gathered over the years. After all of the variables have been entered into the equation, we got the answer of 4,950 civilizations in the Milky Way Galaxy. That is 1450 more civilizations than that of the CDE, and a 41.4% increase. Let us look at some of these possible civilizations, 3 earthlike planets in particular. They all orbit a star called TRAPPIST-1, and the name came from the telescope that Kruse 4 found it, TRAnsiting Planets and PlanetsImals Small Telescope. This telescope is able to see the type of planet, features, perspective, shape, size, and distance from its host star. After all of this was taken into consideration for all three planets, it was concluded that all three of these planets are very earthlike and have a high possibility of life. Not on the whole planet though, all three planets are tidally locked, meaning one side is always facing the sun and the other is not. With this, there is something called the Goldilox zone, the part of the planet that is not facing the sun, or facing away, so it is warm but not scorching, and cool but not frozen. It is just like the porridge in the middle that Goldilocks ate the one that is just right. This is the spot on the planet that the earthlike life would exist. All paragraphs should have at least one citation The star that the planets orbit is called an Utra Cool Dwarf Star. This star itself is 1/8 the size of our sun, similar to Jupiter. It being a smaller star is very good, “When it comes to detecting the kind of atmosphere that would support life as it’s known, smaller stars are better” (Feltman). That is very good, but what makes these three planets so viable is that its star is not only small, but also similar to earth’s, just like the planets are similar to earth itself. Rachel Feltman said, “The holy grail for an earthlike planet is one with a similar star” (Feltman). This is why these planets are such good candidates for life. The best thing about this discovery is what Adam Burgasser of University of California at San Diego pointed out, “If earth-like planets around these stars turnout to be common, there may be many more habitable planets out there than current estimates predict” (Feltman). This widens the already huge scope for the possibility of extraterrestrial life. There is one more planet that needs to be looked at; it is the closest one to us out in our solar system. It is Proxima b, it orbits a low mass red dwarf star a.k.a an M-class dwarf. The dwarf star is known as Proxima Centauri. Proxima b is the closet planet to us the universe which Kruse 5 in turn makes it a lot easier to observe. It has a rocky terrestrial surface just like earth, and it is in the habitable zone of its star, a certain distance from the star that would have a temperature like ours making life possible, which means it could contain liquid water. It is also close enough that robotic exploration is possible, only 4.2 light years away or 92.96 million miles. Proxima b is 5% closer to its sun that we, earth, are to our sun. The only reason that life is possible is because Proxima Centauri is cooler (less hot) than our sun, which allows for the planet to be closer. At its distance and heat produced by the sun, it is estimated that the planet’s atmosphere is about 86104 degrees Fahrenheit. The scientists and astronomers surveilling the planet are also tracking its Doppler wobble, back and forth rotation of the planet. This is caused by gravitational pull, and the way that it is wobbling means that there is another planet near and this one could have the perfect conditions for life. You must cite other information besides direct quotes. I went over in class. I like that you put your ideas into easily understood sentences. This paper sounds like YOU---I like that very much. Keep going Carter—nice start! Kruse 6 Sources Cited “Extraterrestrial Life”. 22 Jan 2016, SIRS Issues Researcher Feltman, Rachel. "3 Earth-Like Planets might be Scientists' Best Chance at Detecting.." Washington Post, 03 May 2016, pp. A.16. SIRS Issues Researcher. NASA. "Preparing for Alien Life." phys.org, edited by NASA, 11 Nov. 2014. Accessed 10 Nov. 2014. Netzley, Patricia D. "Area 51." The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Paranormal Phenomena. Greenhaven Press, 2006, pp. 36-37. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, Accessed 10 Jan. 2017. Netzley, Patricia D. "Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence." The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Paranormal Phenomena. Greenhaven Press, 2006, pp. 66-67. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, Accessed 11 Jan. 2017. Netzley, Patricia D. "Mack, John E. (1929–2004)." The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Paranormal Phenomena, Greenhaven Press, 2006, p. 186. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, Accessed 11 Jan. 2017. “Life Probably Exists on Other Planets”. Paranormal Phenomena. Edited by Brenda Stalcup et al., San Diego, Greenhaven Press, 2001. Strickland, Ashley. "Closest Potentially Habitable Planet to our Solar System found." CNN Wire Service, 24 Aug 2016, pp. n/a. SIRS Issues Researcher. Accessed 10 Jan. 2017. Kruse 7 Shekhtman, Lonnie. "Probability we'Re the Only Intelligent Life Ever? really Low.." Christian Science Monitor, 01 May 2016, pp. n/a. SIRS Issues Researcher. Accessed 10 Jan. 2017. New one below ask Mrs. Anthony about it. To site my source http://www.space.com/32793-intelligent-alien-life-probability-high.html