* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ALLHAT
Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Understanding the Neuronal Hormonal Mechanisms and End-Organ Protection JEAN-BERNARD DURAND, M.D., FCCP, FACC ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE MEDICAL DIRECTOR CARDIOMYOPATHY SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M. D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER HOUSTON, TEXAS Jean-Bernard Durand, M.D. Presenter Disclosure Information I will not discuss off label use and/or investigational use in my presentation. I have the following financial relationships to disclose: Employee of: University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Overview • The renin –angiotensin system • Defining effective RAS blockade • Strategies for RAS blockade • End-organ Protection provided by RAS blockade Development of Antihypertensive Therapies ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS (ACEIs) • MOA: Block conversion of angiotensin I (AG I ) to angiotensin II ( AG II ) – AG II is a potent vasoconstrictor, and causes aldosterone secretion – Cause peripheral vasodilation TPR BP ACEIs • 1st LINE IN PATIENTS WITH CHF OR DIABETES per JNC VI – Proteinuria in DM pts – May stabilize renal function • Also 1st Line Agents for CHF ACEIs Agents • Captopril ( Capoten ) • Enalapril ( Vasotec ) • Fosinopril ( Monopril ) • Lisinopril ( Prinivil, Zestril ) Side Effects • DRY COUGH: 80-90% • 1st dose hypotension ( seen more with captopril) • Hyperkalemia • Quinapril ( Accupril ) • Angioedema (rare) • Ramipril ( Altace ) • Renal dysfunction ACEIs Dosage Range (mg/day) Common Dose Captopril Enalapril Fosinopril Lisinopril Quinapril Ramipril 25 – 150 mg 5 – 40 mg 10 – 40 mg 5 – 40 mg 5 – 80 mg 5 – 20 mg 25 mg BID-TID 10 mg BID 10-20 mg QD 10-20 mg QD 20-40 mg QD 5 mg QD 4 – 32 mg 150 – 300 mg 25 – 100 mg 20 – 80 mg 80 – 320 mg 8 mg QD 150 mg QD 50 mg QD-BID 40 mg QD 160 mg QD ARBS Candesartan Irbesartan Losartan Telmisartan Valsartan ACEIs Drug Interactions • K+ sparing diuretics • K+ supplements • ACEI effect: – ASA / NSAIDs – Sympathomimmetics Contraindications • Bilateral Renal artery stenosis • Pregnancy Precautions • Renal Insufficiency ACEIs Monitoring Parameters Special Considerations • BP • Post MI • Scr • K+ • Prevent progression of proteinuria in DM pts • Angioedema • Improve insulin sensitivity • Tolerance of dry cough • No change in lipids • No sexual dysfunction ACEIs Counseling • We are treating HTN to prevent MI and stroke! • Stress adherence • Side effects: – DRY COUGH: will occur, usually with time – May do some blood work to make sure kidneys working properly Physiology and Pathophysiology of the Renin Angiotensin System Hypertension Is Associated With Vascular Damage Along the Entire CV Continuum Transmural MI Ventricular Remodeling Atherosclerosis Ventricular Dilatation Heart Failure (HF) Endothelial Dysfunction Hypertension Oxidative Stress Angiotensin II Vascular Damage Adapted from Dzau V et al. Am Heart J. 1991;121:1244–1263. End Stage CVD The Renin-Angiotensin System Alternate Pathway Circulating Local (Liver) (Tissue) Renin inhibitors Angiotensinogen Renin Non-renin pathways • t-PA • Cathepsin G • Tonin Angiotensin I ACE inhibitor Converting enzyme Angiotensin II A-II receptor blockers Angiotensin receptors Non-ACE pathways • Chymase • CAGE • Cathepsin G Ang II Plays a Central Role in Organ Damage Angiotensin I Angiotensinogen Liver Blood Vessel Renin ACE Lungs Heart Angiotensin II Vasoconstriction SMC hypertrophy Superoxide generation Endothelin secretion Monocyte activation Inflammatory cytokines Brain Reduced fibrinolysis Vasopressin secretion Sympathetic activation Kidney Sodium and water retention Efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction Glomerular and intenstitial fibrosis Adapted with permission from Givertz MM. Circulation. 2001;104:E14–E18. Cellular hypertrophy Myocyte apoptosis Myocardial fibrosis Inflammatory cytokines Coronary vasoconstriction Positive inotropy Proarrhythmia Adrenal Gland Aldosterone secretion The Definition of “Uncontrolled Hypertension” varies in clinical practice JNC 7 Blood Pressure Classification (mmHg) Blood Pressure Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Normal Prehypertension Stage 1 hypertension Stage 2 hypertension <120 120-139 140-159 ≥160 Clin J Onco Nursing;2005:9(4);407-11 (mmHg) Diastolic Blood Pressure <80 80-90 90-99 ≥ 100 RAS and SNS Pathophysiology in Cardiac Disease Progression Hypertension MI/CAD CHEMOTHERAPY Injury to the Heart Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation Sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation Angiotensin I ACE inhibition Norepinephrine 1-Receptors 2-Receptors Arrhythmia, myocyte cell death, hypertrophy, LVD Arrhythmia, sudden death, potassium loss 1-Receptors Arrhythmia, sudden death, vascular resistance, adverse lipid effects, impaired renal blood flow, myocyte cell death, hypertrophy, Na retention Selective -blockade Angiotensin II Nonselective -blockade ARB Mortality and disease progression ARB=angiotensin II receptor blocker; CAD=coronary artery disease; MI=myocardial infarction. Reaven GM et al. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:374–381. Packer M. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1998;41:39–52. Nonselective -blockade with 1-blockade ACC/AHA Staging System for Heart Failure Stage A B C C D High risk for developing heart failure (HF) Patient Description • • • • • Hypertension Coronary artery disease Diabetes mellitus Family history of cardiomyopathy Cardiotoxic chemotherapy Asymptomatic HF • Previous myocardial infarction • Left ventricular systolic dysfunction • Asymptomatic valvular disease Symptomatic HF • Known structural heart disease • Shortness of breath and fatigue • Reduced exercise tolerance Refractory end-stage HF Hunt SA, et al. Circulation 2000; 104:2996-3007. • Marked symptoms at rest despite maximal medical therapy (eg, those who are recurrently hospitalized or cannot be safely discharged from the hospital without specialized interventions) ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and the Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult ACE Inhibitor Therapy A Stage High risk for developing heart failure (HF) Guideline Recommendation ACE inhibition in patients with history of atherosclerotic vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension and associated risk factors B Asymptomatic HF C Symptomatic HF ACE inhibition in patients with recent or remote history of myocardial infarction regardless of ejection fraction ACE inhibition in patients with reduced ejection fraction, whether or not they have experienced a myocardial infarction ACE inhibition in all patients, unless contraindicated D Refractory end-stage HF Hunt SA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38:2101–2113. Includes all the above listed ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult -Blockade Therapy Stage Patient Description A High risk for developing heart failure (HF) For patients that are on combination therapy for hypertension (HTN), drugs that treat HTN and HF (eg, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and -blockers) are preferred B Asymptomatic HF Patients with a recent myocardial infarction, regardless of ejection fraction Patients with a reduced ejection fraction, whether or not they have experienced a myocardial infarction C Symptomatic HF In all stable patients, unless contraindicated. Patients should have no or minimal evidence of fluid retention and should not have required treatment recently with a intravenous positive inotropic agent D Refractory end-stage HF Includes all the above listed Hunt SA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38:2101–2113. JNC 7: Antihypertensive Drug Classes for High-Risk Hypertensive Conditions Recommended Drugs High-Risk Condition With Compelling Indication HF ThiazideType Diuretic • -Blocker • • Post-MI ACEI • • • • Diabetes • • • Recurrent Stroke Prevention • • CCB • • High Coronary Disease Risk Chronic Kidney Disease ARB • • • Aldosterone Antagonist Clinical Trial Basis • ACC/AHA HF Guidelines, MERIT-HF, COPERNICUS, CIBIS, SOLVD, AIRE, TRACE, Val-HeFT, RALES • ACA/AHA Post-MI Guidelines, BHAT, SAVE, CAPRICORN*, EPHESUS • ALLHAT, HOPE, ANBP2, LIFE, CONVINCE • NKF-ADA Guidelines, UKPDS, ALLHAT NKF Guidelines, Captopril Trial, RENAAL, IDNT, REIN, AASK PROGRESS Effect of Ramipril on Cardiovascular Events in Diabetic Patients: MICRO-HOPE Primary Outcome* 0.25 Placebo Kaplan-Meier Rates 0.20 All-Cause Mortality 0.16 Ramipril 0.12 0.15 0.08 0.10 0.04 0.05 0 0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 MI 0.16 1,400 1,600 1,800 0 200 400 Stroke 0.08 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.03 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 1,400 1,600 1,800 0 0 0 1,000 1,200 Cardiovascular Mortality 0. 12 0.12 0 800 600 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Duration of Follow-up (days) *Primary outcome defined as development of MI, stroke, or CV death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for 3,577 participants with diabetes. HOPE Study Investigators. Lancet. 2000;355:253-259. 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Angiotensin II Plays a Central Role in Organ Damage Atherosclerosis* Stroke Vasoconstriction Vascular hypertrophy Endothelial dysfunction Hypertension A II AT1 Receptor LV hypertrophy Fibrosis Remodeling Apoptosis GFR Proteinuria Aldosterone release Glomerular sclerosis Heart Failure MI Death Renal Failure *Preclinical data. LV = left ventricular; MI = myocardial infarction; GFR = glomerular filtration rate. Adapted from Willenheimer R, et al. Eur Heart J . 1999;20:997–1008; Dahlöf B. J Hum Hypertens. 1995;9(suppl 5):S37–S44; Daugherty A, et al. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:1605–1612; Fyhrquist F, et al. J Hum Hypertens. 1995;9(suppl 5):S19–S24; Booz GW, Baker KM. Heart Fail Rev. 1998;3:125–130; Beers MH, Berkow R, eds. The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy. 17th ed. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck Research Laboratories. 1999:1682–1704; Anderson S. Exp Nephrol . 1996;4(suppl 1):34–40; Fogo AB. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35:179–188. Plasma ACE, nmol/mL/min Angiotensin II Escape With Long-term ACEI Therapy 100 80 60 40 20 0 Plasma A II levels increase with time, although plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity remained suppressed * * * * * * * * 24h 1 2 3 4 Months 5 6 Plasma A II, pg/mL 30 20 10 * 0 Placebo 4h Hospital *P < 0.001 vs placebo. Adapted with permission from Biollaz J, et al. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1982;4:966–972. ALLHAT Trial Design Antihypertensive and Lipidlowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) 33,357 participants aged 55 years or older with HTN and at least 1 other CHD risk factor Antihypertensive component: randomized, double-blind (no ARB studied) Lipid-lowering component is unblinded Assessment ALLHAT. of MI JAMA. will rely on 2002;288:2981-2997. ALLHAT Study Endpoints Antihypertensive Component • Primary endpoints: CHD, non-fatal MI • Secondary endpoints: All-cause mortality Combined CHD (CHD, revascularization, hospitalized angina) Stroke LVH by ECG Renal disease • Slope and reciprocal of serum creatinine • ESRD • QOL, major costs of medical care ALLHAT. JAMA. 2002;288:2981-2997. ALLHAT Primary Outcome* No significant differences among the 3 treatment groups Cumulative Event Rate, % 20 Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril 16 12 8 4 0 No. at Risk Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril 15255 9048 9054 1 2 3 4 5 Time to Event, years 14477 8576 8535 13820 8218 8123 13102 7843 7711 11362 6824 6662 6340 3870 3832 6 7 2956 1878 1770 209 215 195 * Fatal coronary heart disease event or non-fatal myocardial infarction. ALLHAT. JAMA. 2002;288:2981-2997. ALLHAT Study Results Primary Endpoint: • ALLHAT found no difference between the three treatment groups on the primary endpoint of combined fatal coronary heart disease and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Secondary Endpoints: • Secondary outcomes were similar for clorthalidone, and amlodipine, except that a 38% higher for HF with a 6-year absolute risk difference of 2.5% was seen with amlodipine • Secondary outcomes were also similar for chorthalidone and lisinopril, except that a 15% higher risk for stroke and a 10% higher risk for combined CVD was seen with lisinopril. Author’s Conclusion: • Thiazide-type diuretics are superior in preventing 1 or more major forms of CVD and are less expensive. They should be preferred for first-step ALLHAT. JAMA. 2002;288:2981-2997. antihypertensive therapy. ALLHAT Key Messages • More aggressive treatment of blood pressure is needed today. According to JNC VI, only 27% of hypertensive patients are treated to goal. In ALLHAT, despite the use of multiple medications, only 66% of patients were controlled to <140/90 mmHg. • Multiple agents are required to achieve BP targets. Regardless of which agent was used, Initially, only 30% of patients in ALLHAT were controlled on monotherapy. Six-Year Rate of Clinical Outcomes by High-Risk Treatment Group Chlorthalidone Amlodipine CHD* 11.5% 11.3% Heart Failure 7.7 10.2 Revascularization ALLHAT 9.2 Lisinopril 11.4% 8.7 10.0 10.2 Cancer 9.7 10.0 9.9 Stroke 5.6 5.4 6.3 GI Bleeding 8.8 8.0 9.6 17.3 16.8 17.2 All-cause mortality •Primary outcome, consisting of 64-66 percent of nonfatal MI’s Source: ALLTHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium-channel blocker vs diuretic. JAMA 288:2981, 2002 Benefits of Lowering BP Average Percent Reduction Stroke incidence 35–40% Myocardial infarction 20–25% Heart failure 50%