* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download From populations to communities
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Reminder Quiz – Chapters 11 and 8: Friday December 17 Mustafa: syllabus. See email. To all: follow your own deadlines please 1 5/5/2017 2 5/5/2017 3 5/5/2017 A few points Populations exist in the context of the whole community Each is within a whole web of interactions Each responds differently to the prevailing abiotic conditions …how do biotic and abiotic factors combine to determine dynamics of species populations? What is the importance of the concept of metapopulations? What about food webs? 5 5/5/2017 Multiple determinants of dynamics of populations Why are some species rare and others common? Why does a species occur at low population densities in some places and in high densities at others? What factors cause fluctuations in a species’ abundance? To understand even a single species in a single location – need to know: Physicochemical conditions Level of resources available Organism’s life cycle Influence of competitors, predators, parasites… And how all these factors influence abundance through effects on birth, death, dispersal, and migration 6 5/5/2017 ‘devil in details’ A record of numbers alone: What do they tell us? What don’t they tell us? Thus – need information on age, sex, and size Correlations with external factors. High intensities of disease late blight in potato crops occur 15-22 days after a period in which min temp > 10C and humidity > 75% for 2 consecutive days Correlations – suggest (not prove) causal relationships Cause requires a mechanism Pop too large … what could happen? Correlation does not tell us which of the options could happen. 7 5/5/2017 What does stability mean? Stability does NOT mean “nothing changes” Population: may have complex dynamics, flux, and stability Small, sand-dune plant (androsace septentrionalis): 150 - 1,000 new seedlings / m2 each year Mortality: reduced pop by 30% - 70% Pop kept to same limits 50 plants always survived to fruit and produce seeds for next seeds Stability? 8 5/5/2017 Stability or Change? Do we look for constancy of populations? Or do we emphasize the fluctuations? If emphasize constancy: look for stabilizing forces within populations to explain why populations do not exhibit unfettered (unrestrained) increase or a decline to extinction If emphasize fluctuations: look to external factors (weather? Disturbance?) to explain changes Can the two sides be in agreement? 9 5/5/2017 Stability or Change? How is abundance determined? How is abundance regulated Regulation… Regulation: tendency of a population to decrease in size when it is above a particular level to increase in size when below that level Can occur only due to one or more density-dependent processes that act on rates of b , d and/or movement (remember: Chapter 5) Detected in 80% of studies of insects that lasted > 10 years Determined: Precise abundance of individuals will be determined by combined effects of all the factors and all the processes that affect a population, whether dependent or independent of density Weather typically major determinant Apple thrips: weather accounted for 78% of variation in # 10 5/5/2017 Key factor analysis Can distinguish between what regulates and what determines the abundance of a population Then learn how regulation and determination relate to one another By: key factor analysis (better to name it: key phase analysis) Calculate k-values for each phase of the life cycle k-values measure the amount of mortality The higher the k-value, the greater the mortality k = killing power [read box 9.1] 11 5/5/2017 Key factor/phase analysis How much of the total mortality tends to occur in each of the phases? Mortality = all losses from population What is the relative importance of these phases as determinants of year-to-year fluctuations in mortality, and thus of year-to-year fluctuations in abundance? [is the toll roughly the same year to year?] Then phase mortality is low: total mortality is low: pop is large. And vise versa. A phase with a k-value that varies randomly will – by definition have little influence on changes in mortality So what is needed: to measure the relationship between phase mortality and total mortality: regression coefficient of former on latter Larger regression coefficient: key phase causing pop change Regression coefficient at zero: random phase mortality 12 5/5/2017 What about densitydependency? Plot k-values for each phase against # present at start of the phase For density dependency: k-value would be highest when density is highest. Right? For beetle population Key phase: summer adults Density-dependent: older larvae 13 5/5/2017 Wood frog (rana sylvatica) Key phase determining abundance: larval period, due to year-to-year variations in rainfall Density-dependent: adult phase (due to competition for food) 14 5/5/2017 15 5/5/2017 Dispersal, patches, and metapopulation dynamics Migration can be a vital factor in determining and/or regulating abundance Disease : important role when populations are fragmented and patchy (as many are) Abundance of patchily distributed organisms: determined by properties of two features: ‘habitable site’ and ‘dispersal distance’ Metapopulation: if pop comprises a collection of subpopulations, each one of which has a realistic chance both of going extinct and of appearing again through recolonization 16 5/5/2017 American pika Metapopulations: N, middle, and S network of patches Northern network: high occupancy throughout study period (1972-1991) Middle network: more variable and much lower occupancy Southern network: steady and substantial decline When isolated (in simulation): northern network was fine, but middle and southern networks crashed When entire network simulated as a single entity: middle network – stable, southern network: periodic collapses Consistent with data So? – northern network acts as a net source of colonizers that prevent middle network from collapsing -> delaying extinction -> allow recolonization of southern network; southern network: transient behavior 17 5/5/2017 Temporal patterns in community composition Patch dynamics. Disturbances open up gaps 2 fundamentally different kinds of community organization Founder-controlled When all species are good colonists and essentially equal competitors; Species are approximately equivalent in their ability to invade gaps and can hold gaps against all comers during their lifetime Examples: tropical reef fish; vacant living space: limiting factor Competitive lottery dominance-controlled Some species are strongly superior competitively Community succession Opportunistic, early-succession species with poorer powers of dispersal mid-succession climax stage; # of species increases (colonization) then decreases (competition) 18 5/5/2017 6)5) Intermediate Community: Community: Finally,-After The those process continues: (and animals) populate the 4)Climax 2) 3) Intermediate Intermediate 1) Pioneer Community: Community: Community: -Larger Seeds Wind a plants volcanic plants brings of small begin theshrubs to area other that plants are the and trees suited for toand growth grow and eventually grow spores and eruption among other or germinating plants the orbest after small (herbs) abegin shrubs glacier bodies are recedes carried ofherbs small by from and plants the an ifwind better like This completely kind replace the isolder very species stable and of life so that the process had of succession suited lichens and area, eventually toof the and acommunity barren, environment, moss replace which rock-filled the attach grow lichen butand better lifeless and grow than moss region on the the slows grown down there. drastically shrubs rocks. community exists and herbs, BECAUSE eventually THESE choking GROWthem BETTER outTHAN of the area Lichens THE LICHENS and mosses AND MOSS. produce acids which cause the Except This also for aweather natural toofdisaster, animal life. this One kind species of community, replaces Weathering rocks Different toapplies kinds continues. (break animals Trees into move that small are into pieces) planted the area, in smallcalled a Climax community, another only will because stay for it aislong better time suited BECAUSE for growth ITroots CAN areas Combined often oncompeting rocks with begin physical better growing than weathering, in the the prior rocks. the animals The first soil forisMORE SUCCESSFULLY (because of better COMPETE use FOR nutrients, AVAILABLE moreget access RESOURCES to WHEN OTHER begin formed resources. to grow into the of rock, and as they bigger ORGANISMS light, etc)rock than COME the INTO current THE inhabitants SAME of area. split Insects the and in small various animals pieces, begin helping toAREA. inhabit thethe physical the area. weathering and soil formation process. 19 5/5/2017 Community succession 20 5/5/2017 Plants and animals in succession Just because plants dominate succession – does not mean that animals necessarily follow Sometimes: animals determine nature of plant community Heavy grazing. Trampling. [box 9.4] 21 5/5/2017 Succession in a patchwork: size and shapes of gaps Has climax been reached? A matter of scale Many successions take place in a mosaic of patches, with each patch, having been disturbed independently, at a different successional stage Large gaps Centers: colonized by species that travel great distances (relatively) Small gaps Colonized by established individuals around periphery of gap 22 5/5/2017 Food webs Let’s examine systems with at least 3 tropic levels Plant – herbivore – predator Let’s then consider direct and indirect effects that a species may have on others on the same or other trophic levels Effects of a predator on individuals of its prey. Clear. What about effects of the predator on the prey’s resources? Or on other predators of that prey? 23 5/5/2017 Food webs: indirect and direct effects What would happen when a species ire removed from a community? Increase in abundance of a competitor Increase in abundance of a prey Or Competitor decrease in abundance Decrease in abundance of a prey Why? Direct effects < indirect pathways 24 5/5/2017 Cats, rats, birds Feral cats threaten local birds Cats eat rats and birds; Remove cats; Exotic Rats have less pressure on them; Rats attack the endangered flightless parrot (Of 21 chicks that hatched between 1981 and 1994, nine were either killed by rats or died and were subsequently eaten by rats) ; parrots translocated to an island w/o the exotic predators 25 5/5/2017 Cat control in 1982 arrested a sharp decline in Kakapo numbers, and they have recently increased under the Kakapo Recovery Plan. Red arrows indicate breeding years. Numbers become less precise before 1995, with the 1977 figure perhaps out by 50 birds. The 2009 figure is as of April 11, 2009. 26 5/5/2017 http://nzgames.org/ 27 5/5/2017 Trophic cascade Predator reduces abundance of its prey impacts trophic level below prey’s own resources increase in abundance Or Predator reduce intermediate predator -> increase herbivore decrease plants (4 trophic levels) 28 5/5/2017 2 year experiment: predation by birds – Glaucous-winged gulls and oystercatchers excluded from large areas in which limpets were common Excluding the birds increased overall abundance of 1 of the limpet species (L. digitalis) , but a second limpet species became rarer (L. strigatella), and a third did not vary in abundance – the third (L. pelta) is the most commonly eaten by the birds. Hmm…how? L. pelta is the birds’s favorite food and it is did not increase with the removal of the birds? 29 5/5/2017 L. digitalis – light colored; occurs on light-colored goose barnacles Dark L. pelta – on dark California mussels Predation by birds reduces areas covered by goose barnacles. So removing predation? Increasing barnacles -> decrease in area covered by mussels [more competition from barnacles] Third species (L. strigatella) is inferior competitively to ohers; increase in L digitalis decrease in L. strigatella released pressure on L. pelta so remain unchanged 30 5/5/2017 Birds -> limpets (and barnacles/mussels) – and algae! Birds eat limpets. Limpets eat fleshy algae. Birds eat barnacles. More space for algal colonization. Birds excluded. Algae cover… Decreased 31 5/5/2017 Food webs Top-down? Predators controlling prey Bottom-up? Plants can limit herbivores “Why is the world green?” (Hairston et al, 1960) Because top-down control predominates? Green plant biomass accumulates because predators keep herbivores in check Or “is the world prickly and tastes bad” (Murdoch, 1966; Pimm, 1991) A world controlled from the bottom up may still be green 32 5/5/2017 To be continued Page 313 33 5/5/2017