Download (MUGA) scanning

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Heart failure wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

History of invasive and interventional cardiology wikipedia , lookup

Cardiothoracic surgery wikipedia , lookup

Jatene procedure wikipedia , lookup

Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup

Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
National Imaging Associates, Inc.
Clinical guidelines
MUGA (Multiple Gated Acquisition) Scan
CPT Codes: 78472, 78473, 78494, +78496
Guideline Number: NIA_CG_027
Responsible Department:
Clinical Operations
Original Date:
Page 1 of 4
Last Review Date:
Last Revised Date:
Implementation Date:
September 1997
August 2016
August 2016
January 2017
INTRODUCTION:
Multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scanning is a radionuclide ventriculography technique
to evaluate the pumping function of the ventricles of the heart. During this noninvasive
nuclear test, radioactive tracer is injected into a vein and a gamma camera detects the
radiation released by the tracer, providing moving images of the heart. From these images,
the health of the heart’s pumping chamber, the left ventricle, can be assessed. It is used to
evaluate the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a measure of overall cardiac function.
It may also detect areas of poor contractility following an ischemic episode and it is used to
evaluate left ventricular hypertrophy.
Initial Clinical Reviewers (ICRs) and Physician Clinical Reviewers (PCRs) must be able to
apply criteria based on individual needs and based on an assessment of the local delivery
system.
INDICATIONS FOR MULTIPLE-GATED ACQUISITION (MUGA) SCAN:




To evaluate left ventricular (LV) function at baseline before chemotherapy or cardiotoxic
therapy; may be repeated prior to subsequent chemotherapy cycles until a total
cardiotoxic dose has been reached.
To evaluate ejection fraction in a patient with congestive heart failure (CHF), when
prior cardiac imaging has proven inadequate for an accurate determination of ejection
fraction.
To evaluate patient, who is obese or who has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD), for coronary artery disease (CAD).
As an alternative form of stress imaging instead of echocardiography or myocardial
perfusion imaging, based upon similar necessity criteria for the evaluation of coronary
or valvular heart disease.
COMBINATION OF STUDIES WITH MUGA:
Abdomen CT/Pelvis CT/Chest CT/Neck MRI/Neck CT with MUGA – known tumor/cancer
for initial staging or evaluation before starting chemotherapy or radiation treatment.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO MUGA:
Request for a follow-up study - A follow-up study may be needed to help evaluate a patient’s
progress after treatment, procedure, intervention or surgery. Documentation requires a
medical reason that clearly indicates why additional imaging is needed for the type and
area(s) requested.
1— MUGA 2017
Proprietary
MUGA Scan Monitoring during Chemotherapy – Chemotherapeutic drugs that are used in
cancer treatment may be toxic to the heart muscle. To minimize the risk of damaging the
heart muscle with these drugs, the patient’s cardiac function may be monitored with the
MUGA scan before and during administration of the drug. Before the first dose of the drug,
a MUGA scan may be performed to establish a baseline left ventricle ejection fraction
(LVEF). It may then be repeated after cumulative doses. If the LVEF begins to decrease,
cardio toxicity risk must be considered if continuing the treatment.
2— MUGA 2017
Proprietary
REFERENCES
ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS 2014 Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis
and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease A Report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice
Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive
Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and
Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Journal of the American College of
Cardiology, 2014, 7, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.017. Retrieved from
http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1891717.
ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 Multimodality
Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Stable Ischemic
Heart Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate
Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of
Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of
America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and
Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Journal of the
American College of Cardiology, 2014, 63(4), 380-406. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.009.
Retrieved from http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1789799
Anagnostopoulos, C., Harbinson, M., Kelion, A., Kundley, K., Loong, C.Y., Notghi, A., . . .
Underwood, S.R. (2004). Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion
imaging. Heart, 90, 1i010. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1876307/pdf/v090p000i1.pdf
Berman, D.S., Kang, X, Hayes, S.W., Friedman, J.D., Cohen, I., Abidov, A., . . .
Hachamovitch, R. (2003). Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission
computed tomography in women compared with men: Impact of diabetes mellitus on
incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management. Journal of the
American College of Cardiology, 41, 1125-1133. Retrieved from
http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/reprint/41/7/1125.pdf
Fatima, N., Zaman, M.U., Hashmi, A., Kamal, S., & Hameed, A. (2011).
Assessing adriamycin-induced early cardiotoxicity by estimating left ventricular ejection
fraction using technetium-99m multiple-gated acquisition scan and echocardiography.
Nucl Med Commun, 32(5), 381-385. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21346663
Hachamovitch, R., Hayes, S.W., Friedman, J.D., Cohen, I., & Berman, D.S. (2004). Stress
myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective
and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary
artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD. Journal of the American College of
Cardiology, 43, 200-208. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14736438
Hacker, M., Jakobs, T., Matthiesen, F., Vollmer, C., Nikolaou, K., Becker, C., & Tiling, R.
(2005). Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion
imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions:
3— MUGA 2017
Proprietary
First clinical experiences Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 46, 1294-1300. Retrieved from
http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/46/8/1294.full.pdf+html
Hakeem, A., Bhatti, S., Dillie, K.S., Cook, J.R., Samad, Z., Roth-Cline, M.D., & Chang, S.M.
(2008) Predictive value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed
tomography and the impact of renal function on cardiac death. Circulation, 118, 25402549. Retrieved from http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/118/24/2540.abstract
Karkos, C.D., Thomson, G.J., Hughes, R., Hollis, S., Hill, J.C., & Mukhopadhyay, U.S.
(2002). Prediction of cardiac risk before abdominal aortic reconstruction: Comparison of
a revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index and radioisotope ejection fraction. Journal of
Vascular Surgery, 35(5), 943-949.Retrieved from
http://www.jvascsurg.org/article/S0741-5214(02)23579-X/abstract
Krahn, A.D., Hoch, J.S., Rockx, M.A., Leong-Sit, P., Gula, L.J., Yee, R., . . . Klein, G.C.
(2008). Cost of preimplantation cardiac imaging in patients referred for a primaryprevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. American Journal of Cardiology,
102(5), 588-592. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18721517
Marcassa, C., Bax, J.J., Bengel, F., Hesse, B., Petersen, C.L., Reyes, E., & Underwood, R.
(2008) Clinical value, cost-effectiveness, and safety of myocardial perfusion
scintigraphy: a position statement. European Heart Journal, 29, 557-63. Retrieved from
http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/content/29/4/557.full.pdf+html
Metz, L.D., Beattie, M., Hom, R., Redberg, R., Grady, D., & Fleischmann, K.E. (2007).The
prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise
echocardiography: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 49,
227-237. Retrieved from http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/reprint/49/2/227.pdf
Mitra D, Basu S. (2012) Equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography: Its usefulness in
current practice and potential future applications, World J Radiol. 2012 Oct 28; 4(10):
421–430. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495989/
Shureiqi, I., Cantor, S.B., Lippman, S.M., Brenner, D.E., Chernew, M.E., & Fendrick, A.M.
(2002). Clinical and economic impact of multiple gated acquisition scan monitoring
during anthracycline therapy. British Journal of Cancer, 86, 226-232. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2375190/pdf/86-6600037a.pdf
Yancy CW., Jessup M., Bozkurt B., Butler J., Casey DE., Drazner MH., Fonarow GC., et al.
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive summary.
A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association
Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2013; 128:1810.
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/128/16/1810
4— MUGA 2017
Proprietary