Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
TRAUMATIC J. J. WILEY,* Traumatic the Other the DePalma The JOHN and J. P. HORWICH,* PEGINGTON,t of Orthopaedic 1970, purpose Smith of this paper Scant an knowledge unusual is to ten OTTAWA, as an of of CANADA of Ottawa isolated lesion particularly the is considered clinical the possible mechanism 1956, TraVaglini 1962, is available cases ELBOW THE University condition, displacement report AT and Anatomy, elbow the as to the nature the this radius (Spinner injury, with a features of injury and Vesely 1967, of the pathological Kaplan 1970). and a study of the relevant features. MECHANISM From elbow RADIUS types of dislocation, Stelling and Cote 1929, 1972). such at the described of the permits Surgery radius have (Thomas which anatomical of the authors classification management lesion THE dislocation injury. including OF the Departments From rare DISLOCATION the history at the time pronated (Vesely it is impossible ofinjury. 1967). OF to be certain It is probable Further violence DETAILS Sex of two forearm, ways : 1) with producing the exact position TEN Direction affected dislocation Female 8 Left Anterior 2 Male 7 Left Lateral 3 Male 10 Right Anterior 4 Female 5 Right Lateral 5 Male 48 Left Lateral 6 Female 5 Left Lateral 7 Male 9 Left Lateral 8 Male 32 Right Lateral 9 Male 7 Left Anterior 10 Male 5 held behind the (Corbett and of I arm forearm and the forearm in at least one PATIENTS Side I (years) ‘ hyperpronation of the I OF Age number of the that the elbow is partly outstretched is applied to the pronated forearm TABLE RELEVANT Case INJURY , Left I back, Anterior ‘ the 193 1); 2) with patient the then affected falls arm backwards fixed on the on his ground in a one-hand handstand) the patient’s body pivots around this extremity (Vesely 1967). In either case the added body weight increases the pronation and applies a varus strain to the elbow. Eventually the annular ligament ruptures laterally or antero-laterally and the radial head escapes from the joint. The dislocated proximal radius may eventually assume (as a position probably lateral, depends anterior, on * the Department t Department 56B, VOL. 6 NO. 3, AUGUST or even postero-lateral positioning of Orthopaedics, of Anatomy, 1974 of to the elbow the extremity after Ottawa Hospital. Faculty General of Medicine, the University joint injury proper. has Its final location occurred. of Ottawa. 501 502 J. J. WILEY, J. PEGINGTON AND CLINICAL The patient, movement. commonly Little in flexion and upon position the be missed the elbow. drawn the capitulum three elbow, long axis of the is accomplished and, if necessary, reduction to weeks direct and the radial then thumb was managed head. The gently aged ten from five years lateral the details The four anterior. extent of Reduction the was Nine unaware right in all only was were closed available limitation for months patients. were There seven 1-A girl aged eight years a fall (Fig. 1). Reduction was years later showed full restoration 1-Anterior Case 2-A boy The was injury under general immobilisation of extension, aged easily across the extension one of joint plaster our from splint for in only three instances. there was so All nine On examination, no instance The free to to nerves aged from from were examine or vessels. accident symptoms six patients had and supination of the were were opportunity interval were patients children Six dislocations related however, pronation Full of recurrence CASE no the examination, I. of the to and restriction had been dislocation. REPORTS sustained an anterior performed of elbow under general anaesthesia. Follow-up examination two movement. There were no symptoms related to the elbow. dislocation of radius at elbow, dislocation of the left radius at the elbow in 1 with normal elbow for comparison (right). a tree sustaining a lateral dislocation of the left radius (Fig. 2). as a total dislocation of the elbow. Reduction was performed anaesthesia, the radius reducing as the forearm was supinated. After three weeks of he was allowed full use of the elbow. Five years later the elbow still lacked 10 degrees although he had no symptoms. initially seven In in Table All years. FIG. Case shown adults. 5 to 20 degrees. from was are no complications ILLUSTRATIVE Case with head. in a posterior were follow-up to of movement. ranging two injuries, There in all cases. seven series involved injury. were wire may dislocation of elbow a line MATERIAL in the but elbow All or extension restored patients years soft-tissue from of any of flexion ten accomplished patients ranging the to forty-eight or less. and review of Depending radius combined radial a Kirschner is immobilised supination. as a total of the normal the any free mobilised. CLINICAL Relevant over against be surprisingly of the of the driving elbow end capitulum. forearm the pressure by and proximal over-diagnosed radiograph supination guarded may to pronation bisects gentle elbow, movement of the or even a lateral radius by HORWICH a painful Passive resistance 1967), that on unstable an is marked the radiograph (Wang It is well to remember elbow cases there dislocation the with is apparent. the through the but P. FEATURES presents distortion of the Reduction of if any extension, on a child, J. fell from described THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY TRAUMATIC DISLOCATION OF THE RADIUS AT THE 503 ELBOW Case 3-A boy aged ten sustained an anterior dislocation of the proximal right radius when he fell from a slide (Fig. 3). The dislocation was reduced under general anaesthesia. The elbow was immobilised in a posterior plaster splint for three weeks and then mobilised. Seven years later there were no symptoms from the elbow; the patient was unaware of any limitation of movement although the elbow lacked 10 degrees of extension. FIG. Case 2-Lateral FIG. Case 2 dislocation. 3 3-Anterior dislocation. PATHOLOGICAL Lateral stripping and incision, its dislocation the of the position with forced included membrane. radius enclosing annular ligament, and extended to include dislocation osseous muscles the The repeatedly lateral aspect of the of the humero-ulnar forearm quadrate joint With the radial head dislocated laterally, radial head to its normal position or directed posteriorly. Although in none of our patients been VOL. described. 56 B, NO. 3, AUGUST 1974 reproduced of the applying certain forces the annular ligament, pronation rupture was ANATOMY in the elbow, to the forearm. the radial head and ligament, remained varus but elbows accurately strain no apparently of corpses incising the by capsule With a lateral capsular could be dislocated from at the elbow apparent injury (Fig. to 4). the This inter- undisturbed. supination of the forearm the head to a seemingly was dislocation posterior, either reduced the irreducible position such dislocation has 504 J. Anterior in dislocation cadaveric anterior posterior tendon could with proximal the and annular of the radial produce dislocation considerable J. PEGINGTON WILEY, of the specimens capsule aspect J. such an end of the in extreme forearm ligament, head. and It did injury. could not be reproduced force, in some cases AND In J. P. radius HORWICH be reproduced could supination, by with completely difficulty severing the applying force in an anterior direction not appear that simple over-pull of the a number of specimens tested this type without extensive disruption of the annular tearing the upper portion of the interosseous of to the biceps anterior ligament membrane. and FIG. 4 Cadaveric specimen-the supinator muscle has been severed and retracted. There is lateral dislocation of the radial head. Note the tear of the lateral joint capsule and annular ligament. Normal head anatomy-During within structures include The capsule which encircles and posterior of the radius (Fig. 5). The the fibres pronation of the the joint capsule, of the elbow the head and margins so that joint neck of the it does strengthened part sweep epicondyle around of the ulna. The quadrate proximal radio-ulnar and in front certain on is also thickened of the several structures maintain the proximal radio-ulnar ligaments distally radius. and the lateral the interosseous the joint. aspect annular annular ligament to the anterior as far to the neck radial head of the joint by the in shape, its apex being attached anterior and posterior ligament. joint radial These membrane. the strbng is attached fibres gain loose attachment rotatory movements of the is triangular to the behind the to blend with The ligament Its lowest with the capsule its base of and supination thus stabilising extends of the notch. interfere This lateral and ulna, ulnar not capsule ligament. to notch the radial as The the borders radial of the collateral radial notch supports the synovial membrane at the inferior limit of the This small ligament extends between the radial neck and the inferior border of the radial notch (Fig. 6). The interosseous membrane is a strong fibrous sheet which stretches between the interosseous borders of the radius and ulna. It has a free upper edge. Its fibres course obliquely downwards proximally ligament joint. from radius to into the extremity ulna, so allowing (Fig. 5). for the transmission THE JOURNAL of forces OF BONE from AND JOINT the hand SURGERY Above from the TRAUMATIC DISLOCATION border of the interosseous the upper tuberosity of the ulna to the OF THE RADIUS membrane radius just AT THE is a variable below its 505 ELBOW fibrous band tuberosity. This is called the oblique cord. Its obliquity is in the opposite direction to the interosseous membrane and it probably represents a portion of the fascia which found on the deep surface of the supinator muscle (Martin 1958) (Fig. 5). stretching structure fibres of the is sometimes OBLIQUE CORD 5 FIG. The stabilising structures which joint. maintain the radio-humeral QUADRATE ANNULAR FIG. 6 The quadrate ligament. The annular ligament has been Radio-ulnar laxity is noted with neutral forearm ulna The supinator and sweeps preserves The The role muscle around provided information of the radial head VOL. 56 B, arises behind the elbow from the the annular ligament and radius to some extent the integrity of the region. stability of the upper end of the radius was of individual stabilising structures-Selective NO. 3, on the role played during supination and AUGUST 1974 by each pronation. LIGAMENT LIGAMENT incised laterally. rotation. lateral to its epicondyle and radial insertion. studied on dissected removal of the of them in maintaining cadaveric stabilising the normal from the It also specimens. structures position 506 J. J. WILEY, Firstly, a series supinator been with removed. the was to the specimens Thus annular ulna of its oblique the J. PEGINGTON was prepared cord, the only structure ligament, AND in each quadrate the of which interosseous membrane, ligament and the lateral elbow ligament had all intact to stabilise the upper end of the radius the radial head in its normal snug relationship left which maintained of the forearm-pronation, Secondly, in all positions J. P. HORWICH neutral and supination. specimens were prepared interosseous membrane, oblique cord, and had been removed. completely ture into became radial so that the only the radial the posterior taut, notch notch fibres (Fig. ofthe the with its of the elbow was divided stabilising was the quadrate ligament. of the forearm the radial position loosely pronation muscle the lateral ligament The annular ligament laterally intact in which supinator struc- In the neutral head fitted only 6). However, with quadrate ligament rigidly of the holding the radial head ulna. Similarly, supination vided good stabilisation as the anterior fibres ligament tightened (Kaplan 1964). Although in the proof this this ligament of the readily normal undoubtedly reinforces proximal radio-ulnarjoint, the stability disruption occurs if the of limits of rotation the forearm are exceeded. Thirdly, tures and 7 FIG. Figure 7-The interosseous membrane and the annular ligament are intact. In pronation the membrane is lax. Figure 8-After lateral incision of the annular ligament the lax interosseous membrane allows dislocation of the head of the radius as the forearm is pronated further. supinated (Fig. The 1). With extreme ligament the forearm was pronated to be dislocated laterally degree annular of slipping lateral one Finally, produced effect two occurs It should from again the were small cord emphasised In pronation there membrane because interosseous of radius was quite in this and some degree ulna possible it would be only thus oblique the cord supination remarkable laxity position the interosseous are more closely is folded is moderately taut when slackening of approxi- between them taut in the the forearm is reappears. completely incised membrane allowed off the capitulum laterally. When the radial head (Fig. 8). Such a it into full with brought and in the membrane. oblique supination, with a good all strucmembrane the head only being capable of capitulum. cord. Pronation of the forearm in articulating found of with Pronation oftension mated and the membrane (Fig. 7). The membrane neutral position and quite still that prepared the degrees the supination but were ligament. varying borders not but band, this be was specimens of annular supination millimetres, several laxity except of these specimens was then the laxity of the interosseous to such an extent that it slipped movement or the produced 8 FIG. specimens removed the tension. If any in the supinated position is not always present. reinforcing (Martin 1958). CONCLUSIONS These anatomical observations stabilises positions. The if present, confers pronation upper of the position membrane of indicate the oblique and some that end relationship cord and stability supination. the of the only the when supinated practical important radius quadrate in the For most is the structure the forearm ligament offer position, purposes, maintaining the normal ligament. The interosseous is in the neutral or supinated only limited support. The cord, annular and the ligament in the extremes however, these two structures are THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY TRAUMATIC considered the radius forearm of insufficient (Kaplan 1964). for lateral DISCLOCATION strength From dislocation OF THE RADIUS to influence significantly these facts it is deduced of the radial head would AT THE the forces the most that be one 507 ELBOW required to dislocate likely position of the of pronation. SUMMARY Isolated I. dislocation associated slight with primarily occurs reinforcing into of the radius elbow because and not diagnosed, belatedly this the injury be a varus occurs strain. most commonly Disruption tearing of the annular joint. The tensing of the manoeuvre it may diagnosed and consequently recognised supination 2. It is suggested that be of of this structure supination, flexion at the elbow ligament, interosseous approximation of the to reduce such an injury. may be more common than over-diagnosed as a congenital as dislocation ofthe total which is the membrane radius radial to previously dislocation of the as a pronation radio-ulnar of most important through neutral ulna, supports appreciated. the injury, articulation elbow, the It may or it may be head. REFERENCES CORBETT, 19, C. H. (1931): 155-157. Anterior dislocation of the radius and its recurrence. British Journal of Surgery, F. (1970): The Management ofFractures and Dislocations-An Atlas. Second edition. Volume I, Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W. B. Saunders. KAPLAN, E. B. (1964): The quadrate ligament of the radio-ulnar joint of the elbow. Bulletin ofthe Hospital for Joi,zt Diseases, 25, 126-130. MARTIN, B. F. (1958): The oblique cord of the forearm. Journal ofAnatomy, 92, 609-615. SMITH, F. M. (1972): Surgery ofthe Elbow. Second edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company. SPINNER, M., and KAPLAN, E. B. (1970): The quadrate ligament of the elbow-its relationship to the stability of the proximal radio-ulnar joint. Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 41, 632-647. STELLING, F. H., and COTE, R. H. (1956): Traumatic dislocation of head of radius in children. Journal of America,z Medical Association, 160, 732-736. THOMAS, T. T. (1929): A contribution to the mechanism of fractures and dislocations in the elbow region. Annals of Surgery, 89, 108-121. TRAVAGLINI, F. (1962): La lussazione traumatica isolata del capitello radiale. Archivo “Pi,tti” di chirurgia degli organi di movimento, 16, 422-441. VESELY, D. G. (1967): Isolated traumatic dislocations of the radial head in children. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 50, 3 1-36. WANG, S. K. (1967): Roentgen diagnosis of radial head dislocation. Pacific Medicine a,zd Surgery, 75, 22-25. DEPALMA, A. p. 749. VOL. 56B, NO. 3, AUGUST 1974