* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Arhats in Buddhism
Longmen Grottoes wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist influences on print technology wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism and violence wikipedia , lookup
Buddhas of Bamiyan wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist cosmology of the Theravada school wikipedia , lookup
Pratītyasamutpāda wikipedia , lookup
Relics associated with Buddha wikipedia , lookup
Persecution of Buddhists wikipedia , lookup
Triratna Buddhist Community wikipedia , lookup
Four Noble Truths wikipedia , lookup
Faith in Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Wat Phra Kaew wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist art wikipedia , lookup
Tara (Buddhism) wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist cosmology wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist texts wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism and psychology wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism in Vietnam wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism and sexual orientation wikipedia , lookup
Noble Eightfold Path wikipedia , lookup
Dhyāna in Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
History of Buddhism in Cambodia wikipedia , lookup
Buddha-nature wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist philosophy wikipedia , lookup
Gautama Buddha wikipedia , lookup
History of Buddhism in India wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist ethics wikipedia , lookup
Decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent wikipedia , lookup
Greco-Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism and Western philosophy wikipedia , lookup
Nirvana (Buddhism) wikipedia , lookup
History of Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Silk Road transmission of Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Sanghyang Adi Buddha wikipedia , lookup
Early Buddhist schools wikipedia , lookup
Bhūmi (Buddhism) wikipedia , lookup
Pre-sectarian Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Fairnot 1 Lauren Fairnot Asian 325 002 Benjamin Brose 11 March 2015 Topic 1: Arhat The term “arhat” predates Buddhism in India.1 In pre-Buddhist India, arhat referred to a saintly person associated with mystic powers and asceticism.2 During the time of the Buddha, arhat was a title for a person who had become enlightened and would attain nirvana within their present lifetime.3 In Pāli Canon, the Buddha himself was considered to be an arhat. This belief of the Buddha being an arhat is honored in Theravada and other early Buddhist traditions, However, in Mahāyāna Buddhism, the Buddha is considered to be a fully-enlightened bodhisattva; arhatship is relegated to a separate, lower rung on the Mahāyāna hierarchy.4 With the emergence of Mahāyāna Buddhism and the bodhisattva path, arhatship fell out of favor, and the bodhisattva path came to replace arhatship as the main path to buddhahood. In actuality, arhatship was the original version of the bodhisattva path, and in the earliest Pāli Canon, the Buddha was considered to be an arhat, rather than a full-enlightened bodhisattva. According to several early Pāli texts, the Buddha did not teach the bodhisattva path during his lifetime.5 In Pāli Canon, Buddha is considered to be an arhat.6 As the definition of arhat changed from the time of the Buddha, so too did the idea of the bodhisattva path and its superiority begin to emerge. In early Indian Buddhism, the term bodhisattva is mainly used to refer to a past life of Gautama Buddha.7 In early Pāli texts, such as the Khandhaka, when the Fairnot 2 Buddha recounts his past lives, he often begins with the phrase: “When I was an unenlightened bodhisattva.” 8 Mahāyāna Buddhism is based on the idea that a bodhisattva is any individual working for the liberation of all sentient beings from saṃsāra. However, the idea of the bodhisattva path only began to appear in Buddhist documents dating back to at least a century after Gautama Buddha’s death.9 In addition, Mahāyāna Buddhism did not emerge until at least another century after the idea of the bodhisattva path began to appear in Buddhist doctrine.10 The idea of the bodhisattva path being the true road to buddhahood is not from Buddha’s original teachings, because the concept of the bodhisattva path emerged long after the Buddha’s death. In early Indian Buddhism, arhatship was dependent on freeing oneself of the “fetters”--the mental bonds that kept one bound to samsāra.11 However, the difference between the Theravada arhat and the Mahāyāna bodhisattva is that arhatship placed an emphasis on individual salvation.12 In Mahāyāna Buddhism, there is a much greater emphasis on group salvation. One key belief in Mahāyāna Buddhism is that the autonomy of the self is an illusion. Because the concept of the self does not truly exist, individual enlightenment is impossible, and all sentient beings must attain enlightenment together.13 In a Mahayanist’s eyes, to follow the arhat path is impossible because of the inherent interconnectedness of all beings.14 Theravada has a greater emphasis on attaining liberation through one’s own effort. Therefore, the goal of Theravada Buddhism was to become an arhat, which was seen as an infallible and incorruptible state of being. However, in Mahāyāna Buddhism, arhats are considered to be inferior to bodhisattvas and capable of being corrupted. 15 In Mahāyāna Buddhism, arhatship is still considered to be one of the holy states a sentient being can reach. However, in Mahāyāna Buddhism, there is a clear hierarchy of holy Fairnot 3 states an individual can achieve, with fully-enlightened buddhas and bodhisattvas being ranked higher than arhats. 16 There are even some Mahāyāna texts that claim that arhatship is an entirely separate path, rather than just a lesser holy state.17 The idea of the inferiority of arhatship is the fundamental idea behind the Mahāyāna story of the ascetic Megha and his encounter with Dipamkara--- the previous Buddha before Gautama Buddha.18 When Megha was given the chance to become an arhat, he refused, and instead choose to follow the bodhisattva path to liberation. This meant he would gradually cultivate Buddhist virtues over countless lifetimes. 19 Megha’s choice to be become a bodhisattva was motivated by his compassion to work for the liberation of all sentient beings. If Megha had chosen the “self-centered” path of the arhat, rather than the compassionate path of the bodhisattva, Gautama Buddha would have never come to be. In Mahāyāna Buddhism, it is believed that arhatship is the inferior path to nirvana, and that all arhats must go on to become bodhisattvas in order to attain true buddhahood.20 An arhat is capable of reaching enlightenment, but not actual buddhahood. If an arhat fails to become a bodhisattva before reaching nirvana, they will fall into a “deep sadhmi” of emptiness, until they are willing to be reawakened and taught the path of the bodhisattva.21 In Mahāyāna Buddhism, arhatship is seen as a path motivated by fear and selfishness, which renders an arhat unable of attaining true buddhahood, unlike the more wise and compassionate bodhisattva. In the earliest Indian Buddhist texts, the Buddha himself was referred to as an arhat. The Khandhaka is an important text in Pāli Canon, and it is generally agreed upon by historians that it was recorded at the first or second council of the Buddha.22 Several times within the Khandhaka, the Buddha refers to his current self as an arhat. In one passage in the second book of the Khandhaka ---the Mahavagga--- shortly after the Buddha’s enlightenment, the Buddha was Fairnot 4 traveling to meet with five monks, when a wanderer asked the Buddha who he was. The Buddha replied: “I am the arhat in the world, I am the supreme teacher.”23 In early Indian Buddhism, arhat had a similar meaning as the Mahāyāna definition of the bodhisattva. An arhat was an enlightened being who would achieve nirvana in their present life.24 Although, Pāli Canon considered Buddha to be an arhat, he was distinguished from other arhats by a number of factors that made him supreme among the arhats. Gautama Buddha was the first in his historical epoch to attain nirvana and buddhahood, so he served as the supreme arhat by paving the way for those after him to attain nirvana. Buddha alone knew the path to nirvana in its entirety, and his role as the creator and guide of the path to buddhahood distinguished him from other arhats. Arhatship is one of the oldest Indian conceptions of a saintly being. As Buddhism developed in India, the term was adapted to refer to an individual who would attain nirvana within their lifetime. Until the advent of the bodhisattva path and Mahāyāna Buddhism, the Buddha himself was referred to as an arhat. He was distinguished from other arhats by being the first in his epoch to reach buddhahood. However, with the emergence of the bodhisattva path and Mahāyāna Buddhism, arhatship was displaced from its original status as the main path of buddhahood. In Mahāyāna Buddhism, arhatship was demonized as an inferior, separate path to enlightenment, and it was believed that anyone who became an arhat would not reach buddhahood. The differing status of arhatship is a major point of divergence between earlier Indian Buddhism and Mahāyāna Buddhism. Fairnot 5 Notes 1. Bhikkhu Bodhi. "Arahants, Bodhisattvas, and Buddhas." (A Theravada Library,1998.) http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/bodhi/arahantsbodhisattvas.html. 2. Ibid. 3. A. G. S. Kariyawasam. “The Bodhisattva Concept.” (Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society, 2002.) http://www.budsas.org/ebud/ebdha238.htm#bp 4. Anthony Tribe, and Paul, Williams. Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. ( Abingdon, VA: Routledge, 2000), 102. 5. Ibid.,137. 6. Bhikkhu Bodhi. "Arahants, Bodhisattvas, and Buddhas." 7. Wendy Doniger. Britannica Encyclopedia of World Religions. (Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 2006) http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/34073/arhat 8. Bhikkhu, Bodhi. "Arahants, Bodhisattvas, and Buddhas." 9. A. G. S., Kariyawasam. “The Bodhisattva Concept.” 10. Rupert, Gethin. The Foundations of Buddhism. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 225. https://ctools.umich.edu/access/content/group/4e5458a0-e4de-4bcb837e-83f4fad77452/4.%20Emptiness/Gethin%20-%20The%20Mahayana.pdf. 11. Bhikkhu Bodhi. "Arahants, Bodhisattvas, and Buddhas." 12. Wendy Doniger. Britannica Encyclopedia of World Religions. 13. A. G. S. Kariyawasam. “The Bodhisattva Concept.” 14. Anthony Tribe, and Paul Williams. Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition, 101. 15. Ibid.,102. 16. Ibid. 17. Ibid.,138. 18. Rupert Gethin. The Foundations of Buddhism, 227. 19. Ibid.,228. 20. Bhikkhu Bodhi.. "Arahants, Bodhisattvas, and Buddhas." 21. Ibid. 22. Wendy Doniger. Britannica Encyclopedia of World Religions 23. Bhikkhu Bodhi.. "Arahants, Bodhisattvas, and Buddhas." 24. Ibid Fairnot 6 Bibliography Bodhi, Bhikkhu. "Arahants, Bodhisattvas, and Buddhas." A Theravada Library, 1998. http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/bodhi/arahantsbodhisattvas.html. Doniger, Wendy. Britannica Encyclopedia of World Religions. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 2006. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/34073/arhat. Gethin, Rupert. The Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. https://ctools.umich.edu/access/content/group/4e5458a0-e4de-4bcb-837e83f4fad77452/4. %20Emptiness/Gethin%20-%20The%20Mahayana.pdf. Kariyawasam, A. G. S. "The Bodhisattva Concept." Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society, 2002. http://www.budsas.org/ebud/ebdha238.htm#bp Tribe, Anthony, and Paul Williams. Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. Abingdon, VA: Routledge, 2000.