Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Extrapolating to time-varying exposure … using biology-based modelling Tjalling Jager Dept. Theoretical Biology Problem of extrapolation Protection goal Available data • different exposure time • different temperature • different species • time-varying exposure • species interactions • populations • other stresses • mixture toxicity •… Time-varying exposure Scientifically interesting response of growth, reproduction and survival? reversibility of effects? how does this translate to population impact and recovery? Specifically relevant for risk assessment accidental spills plant-protection products industrial chemicals; ‘intermittent release’ Fate modelling pesticide fate modelling oil-spill modelling Effects modelling? NOEC and ECx cannot complement fate models • purely descriptive statistics • only valid for particular test duration and endpoint • only defined for constant exposure Impossible to experimentally test each scenario … Biology-based modelling Explicit assumptions about processes chemicals must be taken up to be toxic internal concentration in time external concentration in time toxicokinetics extensively studied toxicodynamics less popular … effects on life history in time Effects on reproduction Effects on reproduction Effects on reproduction Effects on reproduction Sub-lethal effects Understanding growth and reproduction requires understanding resource allocation Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory specifies allocation rules • focus of dept. Theoretical Biology DEBtox TK model • one-compartment model • account for growth toxicokinetics external concentration Target • energy-budget parameter • threshold for effects: NEC internaltarget concentration over time parameter Animal model • simplified DEB model animal model survival/growth/repro Kooijman & Bedaux (1996), Jager et al. (2006) body length cumulative offspring Target: maintenance time Jager et al. (2004) triphenyltin time body length cumulative offspring Target: costs for growth time Alda Álvarez et al. (2006) pentachlorobenzene time DEBtox Well-tested for constant exposure toxicokinetics Recognition in regulatory context • included in ISO/OECD guidance • workshop at JRC/ECB Ispra internaltarget concentration over time parameter Embedded in (inter)national science • e.g., participation in EU projects NoMiracle and ModelKey Applicable to time-varying exposure? animal model survival/growth/repro Time-varying exposure toxicokinetics environ. conc. time target parameter animal model toxicokinetics target parameter animal model Assumption toxicokinetics follows first-order, one-comp. model environ. conc. internal conc. time time toxicokinetics target parameter animal model Assumption effects on energetic processes are reversible blank value environ. conc. assimilation eff. internal conc. NEC time time toxicokinetics target parameter animal model cumul. reproduction body length time time blank value assimilation eff. time Experimental validation Pieters et al. (2006) • • • • Daphnia magna and fenvalerate modified 21-day reproduction test pulse exposure for 24 hours two food levels (relative food level is parameter in DEB) Pulse exposure Body length Cumulative offspring Fraction surviving 70 1 High food 4 60 0.8 50 3 40 2 0.6 30 ‘assimilation’ 5 6 mode of action: 20 phys. parameters: 10 tox. parameters: 0 1 0 0.4 0.2 0 Low food 70 4 Insights 3 • tox. parameters independent of food 50 • chemical effects fully reversible 40 2 1 60 0.8 0.6 30 0.4 20 1 0.2 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 0 0 5 10 15 20 0 0 5 10 15 20 Population approaches Effects on individual budgets forms basis of population response Intrinsic rate of increase • only for exponential growth in constant environment Leslie-matrix model • classes characterised by one state variable (size or age) Cohort-based (e.g., escalator-boxcar train) • cohorts can be specified by many state variables • dynamically follow food concentration Cohort based, fenvalerate High food 10 Limiting food 6 10 4 juveniles adults 10 5 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 3 2 3 10 2 1 0 5 10 time 15 20 Jager et al., 2007 (RIVM report) 25 10 1 0 0 5 10 15 time 20 25 30 35 Concluding remarks Time-varying exposure of populations is highly relevant • both from scientific and regulatory perspective DEBtox provides natural modelling framework • covers both lethal and sub-lethal effects • no fundamental obstacles for time-variable exposure Individual budgets as basis for population response • one of pillars of DEB theory • cohort-based approaches look promising Project structure based on DEBtox, coding MatLab Model development Lab experiments support from BASF AG food? predation? migration? Population framework reversibility? multiple pulses? Data analysis cohort-based Population predictions Extrapolation Model development Lab experiments Data analysis Population framework Population predictions www.bio.vu.nl/thb