* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Submission_Env_Science_Unit_2
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
The proposal to provide off-leash dog areas on the foreshores of Bundeena and Maianbar raises a number of significant legal and environmental issues regarding the protection and conservation of threatened, endangered and migratory birds in the area. Comments The provision of an off-leash dog area without a licence and / or concurrence from the NSW Minister for Climate Change and the Environment and Federal Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts may be in breach of State and Federal environmental legislation and can incur heavy penalties up to a maximum of $550,000 for an individual and $5.5million for a corporation- (see legislation below). The recorded occurrence of endangered, threatened and migratory birds at Bundeena and Maianbar triggers the need for Council to comply with the relevant legislation and international agreements. To provide an off-leash dog area Council must demonstrate under the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (1979), National Parks and Wildlife Act (1974), Threatened Species Conservation Act (1995) and the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999) why such an activity / area is necessary and how it will not have any significant adverse impact on migratory, threatened and endangered bird species. Under NSW legislation a Species Impact Statement (7 part test) is required as part of this process. The pressures associated with habitat loss and diminished food resources are compounded by the extreme sensitivity of many shore / migratory birds to disturbances. When birds are disturbed they do not immediately settle but spend time assessing the threat. The time invested on being more vigilant is time that would otherwise have been spent foraging for food. For most shore birds this becomes a critical issue as there are only limited opportunities to feed during the intertidal periods of the day when the mudflats and sandbars become exposed for foraging. Any reduction in food uptake has serious implications on migratory birds as they must build up sufficient fat reserves to fuel their return journey to regions such as Japan, Korea and Siberia. If a bird has insufficient fat reserves it may delay its return flight or perish on transit. For birds that return the consequence of a delay is that competition for nesting space from other bird species and reduced availability of mates severely affects breeding success. Research undertaken as part of the Port Botany EIS (2003) indicates that disturbance to migratory / shore birds can occur at distances 30 to 90% further than the point at which they take flight and that these distances can range from 100 to 400m. Because the width of the tidal zone to upper beach can be narrow, risk of disturbance to the birds when foraging and or roosting is most likely to occur. The disturbance on the birds from dogs and other activity in this area is potentially quite significant. The impact to migratory birds in this area is reinforced by urban development encroaching onto the foreshores and the expansion of Sydney Airport and Port Botany over the past 40 years. The available habitat for local and migratory birds has severely diminished, concentrating populations on smaller and suboptimal areas, reducing food resources increasing competition and making them more vulnerable to predation by feral cats and foxes. Proposal does not support Council’s core strategic direction under its Strategic Plan Our Shire our Future– Shaping the Shire to 2030, to “Conserve our abundant native flora and fauna”. The following is provided for further information regarding the above. Relevant Legislation The following summaries key elements of State and Federal legislation relevant to this issue. Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999) Under “Subdivision C – Listed Threatened Species and Communities Section 18 Actions with significant impact on listed threatened species or endangered community prohibited without approval”, subsections 2,3,4,5 state that for Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable fauna species “A person must not take an action that: (a) has or will have a significant impact on a listed threatened species included in the [ critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable] category; or (b) is likely to have a significant impact on a listed threatened species included in the [ critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable] category.” And under section 18A “A person is guilty of an offence if: (a) the person takes an action; and (b) the action results or will result in a significant impact on: (i) a species; or (ii) an ecological community; and (c) the species is a listed threatened species, or the community is a listed threatened ecological community.” For Migratory Bird Species: Under “Subdivision D – Listed migratory species Subsection 20 Requirement for approval of activities with a significant impact on a listed migratory species”.. “(1) A person must not take an action that: (a) has or will have a significant impact on a listed migratory species; or (b) is likely to have a significant impact on a listed migratory species.” 20A Offences relating to listed migratory species (1) A person is guilty of an offence if: (a) the person takes an action; and (b) the action results or will result in a significant impact on a species; and (c) the species is a listed migratory species. Note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code sets out the general principles of criminal responsibility. (1A) Strict liability applies to paragraph (1)(c). Note: Subject to further scientific assessment of the known sensitivity of shore bird species the limited range of habitat available at Bundeena and Maianbar and the bird’s close proximity to potential exposure and frequent disturbance from walkers (with or without dogs) and other activities may currently trigger offences under the Act. Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (1979) Under the EP&A Act (1979) a species impact statement must accompany a development application for development that – - is on land that is critical habitat, or is likely to significantly affect threatened species, populations, ecological communities or their habitats. Section 5A of the EP&A Act requires that 7 factors (7 Part Test) be taken into account in determining if there is likely to be a significant impact on threatened species, populations or ecological communities. When a species impact statement is required Council must under ss 79B(2), 112C(1) obtain the concurrence of the Director- General of the Department of Environment and Climate Change to the grant of development consent or approval. National Parks and Wildlife Act (1974) and Threatened Species Conservation Act (1995) A licence must be obtained by Council under the National Parks and Wildlife Act (NPW Act) or the Threatened Species Conservation Act where a threatened species, population or ecological community is impacted upon. Under part 8A of the NPW Act potential harm to a threatened species, population or ecological community will trigger this requirement. Applications for licences under the Threatened Species Conservation Act (TSC Act) are made to the NPWS Director-General, who is responsible for issuing licences (TSC Act, s 92(1), 99). If the activity to be licenced will take place on land that is critical habitat, the application must be accompanied by a species impact statement (TSC Act, s 92(2)). If a species impact statement is not compulsory, the NPWS Director-General can decide that one is necessary if the action is likely to significantly affect threatened species (TSC Act, s 94, 94A). . What is a Threatened and Endangered Species? In NSW, the following things can be listed: Individual species Populations Ecological communities. These things can be listed under the TSC Act once they reach a particular level of endangerment (eg vulnerable, endangered, critically endangered). All of the listings are collectively known as “threatened species, populations and ecological communities”, or are often just referred to as “threatened species”. Individual species Individual species can be listed under the TSC Act as: Presumed extinct not recorded in its known or expected habitat within its lifecycle Critically endangered facing an extremely high risk of extinction in NSW in the immediate future Endangered facing a very high risk of extinction in the near future Vulnerable facing a high risk of extinction in the medium-term future Threatened, Endangered Species: Bundeena Maianbar The following table lists bird species recorded at Bundeena / Maianbar and immediate region. The lists are based on the NPWS threatened species atlas, Sydney Catchment Authority and Port Botany EIS. It should be noted that the occurrence of bird species in an area may appear limited but this is reflective of the limited degree of study and surveys undertaken over time. The close proximity of Bundeena and Maianbar to key but diminishing habitats in the Botany Bay area suggests that many more migratory and regional shore birds are likely to use this area for the foraging of food and or roosting Listed Below are Shore Bird and Migratory Bird Species that frequent the Port Hacking / Botany Bay area. Information is based on NPWS, Sydney Catchment Authority (CMA) and Port Botany EIS (2003) information. Conservation Status E =Endangered, V= Vulnerable, P = Protected, M,J,C = Migratory (JAMBA and CAMBA) Species Taren Point Shorebird Community Characteristic assemblage of the following 20 species: Bar-tailed Godwit (Limosa lapponica), Red Knot (Calidris canutus), Great Knot (Calidris tenuirostris), Sharp-tailed Sandpiper (Calidris acuminata), Curlew Sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea), Red-necked Stint (Calidris ruficolli), Common Sandpiper (Actitis hypoleucos), Terek Sandpiper (Xenus cinereus), Latham’s Snipe Conservation Habitat Requirements Status E, M,J,C The birds leave Australia between April and May. However juveniles, nonbreeders or under-weight individuals often will not migrate north, remaining in their southern foraging grounds over The community usually forage as separate guilds (groups of species) during low tide in locations adjacent to the roost site. The substrates found in the Taren Point area are rich in invertebrates upon which shorebirds feed. Endangered Ecological Community Comments The declining habitat in the Botany Bay area suggests that some individuals from this endangered community are likely to fly south at low tide to forage on exposed intertidal flats off Maianbar. The majority of these species breed in the northern hemisphere, including northeast Siberia and Alaska. They breed during June/July then leave the breeding grounds and migrate south between August and September. They spend the austral summer in Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia, southern Asia and Africa. Upon arrival in Australia, they generally return to traditional feeding and roosting locations Threats Loss of feeding and roosting habitat. Fragmentation or isolation of sites within (Gallinago hardwickii), Grey-tailed Tattler (Heteroscelus brevipes), Grey Plover (Pluvialis squatarola), Pacific Golden Plover (Pluvialis fulva), Common Greenshank (Tringa nebularia), Masked Lapwing (Vanellus miles), Marsh Sandpiper (Tringa stagnatili), Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres), Pied Oystercatcher (Haematopus longirostris), Sooty Oystercatcher (Haematopus fulinginosus), Whimbrel (Numenius phaeopus), and Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariensis). feeding areas resulting in decreasing abundance. Human disturbance at roost and feeding sites. Disturbance by dogs at roost and feeding sites. Pollution. Recovery Strategies Priority actions are the specific, practical things that must be done to recover a threatened species, population or ecological community. The Department of Environment Conservation and Climate Change has identified 20 priority actions to help recover the Taren Point Shorebirds in New South Wales. What needs to be done to recover this species? Raise public awareness and education of the importance of shorebirds and their habitats within the community and local Council. Work closely with Wader Study Groups and agencies across Australia and internationally who have responsibility for migratory waders. Reduction of disturbances and threatening processes. Pied Oystercatcher Haematopus longirostris Sooty Oyster Catcher Haematopus fuliginosus V Forages on exposed sand, mud and rock at low tide, for molluscs, worms, crabs and small fish. Nests mostly on coastal or estuarine beaches although occasionally they use saltmarsh or grassy areas. Nests are shallow scrapes in sand above the high tide mark, often amongst seaweed, shells and small stones. V Favours rocky headlands, rocky shelves, exposed reefs with rock pools, beaches and muddy estuaries. Forages on exposed rock or coral at low tide for foods such as limpets and mussels. Protection of existing habitat Protect important shorebird habitat elsewhere that is utilised by these species. Creation of new suitable habitat. Monitor the shorebirds within Botany Bay and other sites in NSW where these species occur. Research into the ecology and movement of the species occurring at Taren Point. Identify sites of importance for inclusion in reserve systems or recognition under Ramsar. Threats identified by (NPWS): Disturbance to coastal feeding, nesting and roosting areas through beach-combing, fishing, dog-walking, horse-riding and 4WD vehicles. Predation of eggs and chicks by foxes, dogs, cats, Australian Ravens and raptors. Threats identified by NPWS: Disturbance to coastal feeding, nesting and roosting areas through beach-combing, fishing, dog-walking, horse-riding and 4WD vehicles. Predation of eggs and chicks by foxes, dogs, cats, rats and raptors Little Tern Sterna albifrons Bar Tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica E Occassionally seen in Port Hacking M, J, C Usually found in sheltered bays, estuaries and lagoons with large intertidal mudflats and/or sandflats. Feeds on intertidal mudflats. Forages for insects, crustaceans, molluscs, worms, larvae, spiders, fish eggs, frog eggs and tadpoles in soft mud or shallow water. Beach Stone-curlew Esacus neglectus E1 Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascarienes M,J,C Osprey Pandion haliaetus Chestnut Teal Anas castanea V P Roosts and loafs on low banks of mud, sand and shell bars The Beach Stone-curlew occurs on open, undisturbed beaches, islands, reefs and estuarine intertidal sand and mudflats The Beach Stone-curlew forages on large, intertidal mudflats, sandflats, sandbanks and sandpits exposed by low tide Threats (NPWS) Susceptible to human disturbance through beach-combing, boating and 4WD vehicles, Predation by raptors, cats and dogs Intertidal sand and mudflats. Usually roosts at Recorded in the area. Feeds over much of the high tide on beaches or in salt marshes It breeds intertidal mudflats. The Eastern Curlew roosts on in Russia and north-eastern China. On passage, sandy spits and islets, especially on dry beach they are commonly seen in Japan, Korea and sand near the high-water mark, Borneo. The species is uncommon to rare or absent from closely settled parts of south-eastern Australia. Is one of the few ducks able to tolerate high salinity waters. The Chestnut Teal eats seeds and insects, along with some vegetation, as well Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos P Double-banded Plover Charadrius bicinctus Masked Lapwing Vanellus miles Caspian Tern Sterna caspia P Crested Tern Sterna bergii White fronted Tern Sterna striata Common Tern Sterna hirundo P Royal Spoonbill Platalea regia P as molluscs and crustaceans in more coastal habitats. It mainly feeds at the water's edge during the rising tide, dabbling at food items being washed in. The Common Sandpiper breeds in Europe and Asia. In Australasia it visits New Guinea and Australia. It is found mainly on muddy edges or rocky shores. It hunts by day, eating small molluscs, aquatic and terrestrial insects P P Usually found near the coast, in extensive wetlands, on coastal and interior beaches and sheltered estuaries. The nest is a deep scrape, usually unlined, but occasionally sparsely ringed with debris or scraps of local vegetation such as saltbush. P P mainly coastal when not breeding and found in offshore waters, ocean beaches, estuaries and large lakes. The Common Tern breeds in temperate Europe, Asia and North America. The nest is a shallow depression, usually on bare ground, unlined or sparsely lined with twigs, seaweed, feathers, small stones and shells. Found in shallow freshwater and saltwater wetlands, intertidal mud flats and wet grasslands Australian White Ibis Threkiornis caledonicus P Nankeen Night Heron Nycticorax caledonicus Striated Heron Butorides striatus Great Egret Ardea alba Little Egret Egretta garzetta Australian Pelican Pelecanus conspicillatus Darter Anhinga melanogaster Pied Cormorant Phalacrocorax varius Little Black Cormorant Phalacrocorax melanogaster Little Pied Cormorant Phalacrocorax P Feeds mainly on fish in freshwater, and on shrimps in tidal flats; it will also eat other crustaceans and aquatic insects. The Royal Spoonbill is not tolerant of disturbances, especially when breeding, and destruction of habitat by land-clearing, drainage, increased salinity or flooding and weed invasion are all detrimental to both feeding and breeding. Range of food includes both terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates. The most favoured foods are crayfish and mussels, P P P P P P P The Pied Cormorant mainly feeds on fish, but will also take crustaceans and molluscs.