Download Document

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Upper ontology wikipedia , lookup

Knowledge representation and reasoning wikipedia , lookup

History of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Logic programming wikipedia , lookup

Embodied cognitive science wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Lecture 18
Putting First-Order Logic to Work
CSE 573
Artificial Intelligence I
Henry Kautz
Fall 2001
CSE 573
1
Applications of FOL
• Proving Theorems in Mathematics
• Proving Programs Correct
• Programming
• Ontologies – what kids of things makes up the
world?
• Planning – how does the world change over
time?
CSE 573
2
Theorem Proving
Mathematics
• Small number of axioms
• Deep results
In 1933, E. V. Huntington presented the following basis for Boolean algebra:
• x + y = y + x. [commutativity]
• (x + y) + z = x + (y + z). [associativity]
• n(n(x) + y) + n(n(x) + n(y)) = x. [Huntington equation]
Shortly thereafter, Herbert Robbins conjectured that the Huntington equation
can be replaced with a simpler one:
• n(n(x + y) + n(x + n(y))) = x. [Robbins equation]
Algebras satisfying commutativity, associativity, and the Robbins equation
became known as Robbins algebras. Question: is every Robbins
algebra Boolean?
Solved October 10, 1996, by the theorem prover EQP
• Open question for 63 years!
• William McCune, Argonne National Laboratory
• 8 days on an RS/6000 processor
CSE 573
3
Theorem Proving
Program Verification
• Huge number of axioms
• Tedious (but vital!) results
J. Strother Moore (Boyer-Moore Theorem Prover)
Correctness of the AMD5k86 Floating-Point Division: If p and
d are double extended precision floating-point numbers (d
/= 0) and mode is a rounding mode specifying a rounding
style and target format of precision n not exceeding 64, then
the result delivered by the K5 microcode is p/d rounded
according to mode.
CSE 573
4
The TPTP (Thousands of Problems for
Theorem Provers) Problem Library
Logic
Combinatory logic
Logic calculi
Henkin models
Mathematics
Set theory
Graph theory
Algebra
Boolean algebra
Robbins algebra
Left distributive
Lattices
Groups
Rings
General algebra
Number theory
Topology
Analysis
Geometry
Field theory
Category theory
Computer science
Computing theory
Knowledge representation
Natural Language Processing
Planning
Software creation
Software verification
Engineering
Hardware creation
Hardware verification
Social sciences
Management
Syntactic
Puzzles
Miscellaneous
CSE 573
5
Progress
Automated theorem proving “stalled” in 1980’s
Recent resurgence
• Massive memory, speed
• Code sharing via web
– you can download a program to do your homework!
• Integration of propositional reasoning
techniques into FOL theorem proving
– clever heuristics for grounding formulas
CSE 573
6
Programming in Logic
Prolog – FOL as a programming logic
• FO Horn clauses
–
–
–
–
still Turing complete!
restricted form of resolution theorem proving
Idea: Predicate = Program
Function symbols = way to build data structures
[ 1, 2, 3 ] = cons(1,cons(2,cons(3,nil)))
 X, T . member(X, cons(X, T))
 X, Y, T . (member(X, T)  member(X, cons(Y,T)))
member(X, [X|T]).
member(X, [Y|T]) :- member(X, T).
query: member(3, [1, 2, 3, 4]) returns true
CSE 573
7
Prolog: Computing Values
append([], L, L).
append([H|L1], L2, [H|L3]) :- append(L1,L2,L3).
queries:
• append([1,2],[3,4],[1,2,3,4]) returns true
• append([1,2],[3,4],X) returns X = [1,2,3,4]
• append([1,2],Y,[1,2,3,4]) returns Y=[3,4]
CSE 573
8
Deductive Databases
Datalog:
• Facts = DB relations (tables)
• Rules = Prolog without function symbols
• Decidable, but PTIME-complete
salary_by_name(X,Y) :- ssn(X,N) & salary_by_ssn(N,Y).
CSE 573
9
Ontologies
on·tol·o·gy n. The branch of metaphysics that deals with the
nature of being.
AI definition: a set of axioms that describe some aspect of
the world in terms of types of objects and relationships
between objects.
CSE 573
10
Example Ontology: Categories
anything
abstract
physical
position
machine
animate
animal
emotion
happiness
robot
human
CSE 573
11
Example Ontology: Subtypes
anything
abstract
physical
position
machine
animate
animal
emotion
happiness
robot
human
 x . (anything(x) (physical(x)  abstract(x)))
 x . (robot(x)  machine(x))
CSE 573
12
Example Ontology: Relations
anything
abstract
physical
position
machine
animate
emotion
animal
happiness
robot
human
 x . (physical(x)   y . (position(y)  location(x,y))
CSE 573
13
Example Ontology: Instances
anything
abstract
physical
position
machine
animate
animal
emotion
happiness
robot
R2D2
human
robot(R2D2)
location(R2D2, X24Y99Z33)  position(X24Y99Z33)
CSE 573
14
Why Formalize Ontologies?
Knowledge exchange and reuse
• Common syntax not enough
• How do the your meanings relate to my
meanings?
– Is Bill Gate’s meaning of “expensive” the same as
mine?
• What to do when we have different ways
of conceptualizing the world?
– Eskimo’s words for snow
CSE 573
15
Categories in Dyirbal, an
aboriginal language of Australia
• Bayi: men, kangaroos, possums, bats, most snakes,
most fishes, some birds, most insects, the moon,
storms, rainbows, boomerangs, some spears, etc.
• Balan: women, anything connected with water or fire,
bandicoots, dogs, platypus, echidna, some snakes,
some fishes, most birds, fireflies, scorpions, crickets,
the stars, shields, some spears, some trees, etc.
• Balam: all edible fruit and the plants that bear them,
tubers, ferns, honey, cigarettes, wine, cake.
• Bala: parts of the body, meat, bees, wind, yamsticks,
some spears, most trees, grass, mud, stones, noises,
language, etc.
CSE 573
16
Ontologies + XML =
Semantic Web (Tim Berners-Lee)
CSE 573
17
Representing Change
CSE 573
18