* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Thiroux_PPTs_Chpt8
Survey
Document related concepts
Lawrence Kohlberg wikipedia , lookup
Moral disengagement wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development wikipedia , lookup
Critique of Practical Reason wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Moral relativism wikipedia , lookup
Moral development wikipedia , lookup
Moral responsibility wikipedia , lookup
Morality throughout the Life Span wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Ethics: Theory and Practice Jacques P. Thiroux Keith W. Krasemann Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Eight Setting Up a Moral System: Basic Assumptions and Basic Principles Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Conflicting General Moral Sense • Consequentialism v. Nonconsequentialism – We must consider the consequences of our decisions, acts, and rules, but at the same time be aware of and avoid the endjustifies-the-means problem Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Conflicting General Moral Sense • Self v. Other-interestedness – There are problems associated with a totally self-interested basis for morality; therefore, I agree with the utilitarian approach of doing what is in the best interest of everyone Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Conflicting General Moral Sense • Act v. Rule – In a moral system, we require freedom (act) and yet also stability and order (rule) • Emotion v. Reason – In a moral system, we require reason without excluding emotion Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Basic Assumptions • What constitutes a workable and livable moral system: – Rationally based and yet not devoid of emotion – Logically consistent but not rigid and inflexible – Universality or general application to all humanity and yet be applicable in practical ways to individuals and situations – Able to be taught and promulgated – Ability to resolve conflicts Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Including Rational and Emotional Aspects • Emotion – Moral issues have an emotional dimension – But we cannot make moral decisions solely based on emotion alone – Feelings are too unreliable and individualistic – Another basis that is fairer and more objective is needed Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Including Rational and Emotional Aspects • Reasoning implies several things: – Logical argument, which includes supplying empirical evidence in support of one’s position – Logical consistency, which involves avoiding fallacies and making sure that one’s argument follows smoothly from one point to the next until it arrives at a logical conclusion Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Including Rational and Emotional Aspects • Reason (cont’d) – A certain detachment from feelings; this springs from reasoning’s formality, which forces one to consider the truth and validity of what the individual and others are thinking and saying – A common means by which differences in feelings, opinions, and thoughts can be arbitrated Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Logical Consistency • Logical consistency creates stability within a moral system • But a moral system that says something can never in any situation be done morally is too rigid • Therefore, we must strive for logical consistency but allow for enough flexibility so that the system remains applicable Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Universality and Particularity • Universality – Morality that attempts to help all human beings relate meaningfully must strive to possess universal applicability • Particularity – But one’s moral system should not become so generalized and abstract that it cannot be applied to particular situations and individuals Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Ability to Be Taught and Promulgated • If any moral system is to be applied to more than one person, it must be able to be promulgated, that is, laid out for people to see and understand • It should also be teachable so that others can learn about is regardless of whether they wish to accept or reject it Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Ability to Resolve Conflicts • A workable moral system must be able to resolve conflicts among duties and obligations, and even among its participants • If any moral theory or system proposes a series of duties and obligations that human beings ought to perform or be responsible for, yet fails to tell people what they should do when these conflicts arise, then the entire theory is thrown into doubt Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Basic Principles, Individual Freedom, and Their Justification • The problems of morality center essentially upon two areas: – How to attain unity and order by working with basic principles so as to avoid the chaos of situationism and intuitionism – How to allow individual and group freedom to work with such principles meaningfully Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Basic Principles, Individual Freedom, and Their Justification • The Value of Life principle states that human begins should revere life and accept death • The Principle of Goodness or Rightness is ultimate to any moral system, and it requires that human beings attempt to do three things: – Promote goodness over badness and do good – Cause no harm or badness – Prevent badness or harm Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Basic Principles, Individual Freedom, and Their Justification • The Principle of Justice or Fairness – This is distributive justice, meaning that human beings should treat other human beings justly and fairly when attempting to distribute goodness and badness among them – Theories about, and ways of distributing, good and bad have been fully described in Chapter 6 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Priority of the Basic Principles • There are two ways of establishing the priority of the five moral principles • In the first, or general, way, the principles are classified into two major categories based upon logical and empirical priority Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Priority of the Basic Principles • First Category: • Value of Life principle – Because without life there can be no morality whatever • Principle of Goodness – Because it is the ultimate principle of any moral system • Both are logically and empirically prior to the other three principles Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Priority of the Basic Principles • Second category: • Principle of Justice of Fairness – Because in most human actions more than just one person is involved, and some form of distribution of goodness and badness must be established • Principle of Truth Telling or Honesty – Because it follows from the need to be fair and just in one’s dealings with others Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Priority of the Basic Principles • Second category (cont’d): • Principle of Individual Freedom • Because each individual is the only one truly able to decide what is good for himself Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Priority of the Basic Principles • In the second, or particular way, priority is determined only be referring to the actual situation or context in which moral actions and decisions occur Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Situation or Context • Importance of the situation and context of moral problems and basic principles – The situation or context is important because morality always occurs in particular situations to particular people, never in the abstract – We must start from a broad yet humanly applicable, near-absolute principle so that there will be some basis for acting morally and avoiding immorality Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Humanitarian Ethics • Humanitarian Ethics is an eclectic approach, a “mixed deotological,” or combined consequentialist-nonconsequentialist and actrule, approach to morality • How did these two moral issues hold up under the five principles? – Living together before marriage – Rape Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.