* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Extended-cavity tapered lasers with volume Bragg gratings at 810
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Cross section (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Controlling spontaneous emission J-J Greffet Laboratoire Charles Fabry Institut d’Optique, CNRS, Université Paris Sud Palaiseau (France) 1 Lecture 1 Controlling spontaneous emission: nanoantennas and super radiance Lecture 2 Harnessing blackbody radiation 2 Goal of an antenna for single photon emission Electrical Engineering point of view: The source drives the antenna currents The currents radiate Quantum optics point of view: The atom excites the antenna mode The antenna mode has radiative losses How can we get more energy out of one atom ? 3 Example of antenna Chevalet 4 Optical Nanoantennas Mühlschlegel et al. Science 308 p 1607 (2005) 5 Nanoantenna for fluorescence Anger et al., PRL 96, 113002 (2006) Kühn et al. PRL 97, 017402 (2006) 6 Tailoring decay rate Drexhage 7 Controlling the direction 8 Controlling the lifetime Fermi golden rule : G= 1 t is proportional to LDOS t vacuum LDOS FP = = t mc LDOSvacuum w2 LDOSvacuum (w ) = 2 3 ; LDOSmc (w ) = 3p c ( Dw / 2p ) (w - w0 ) 2 1 2 æ Dw ö Vmod e +ç ÷ è 2 ø ; LDOSmc (w 0 ) = 2Q pw 0Vmod e LDOSmc (w ) 3Ql3 Fp = = LDOSvacuum (w ) 4 p 2Vmod e 9 Increasing the decay rate Akselrod et al., Nature Photonics 8, p 835 (2014) 10 Outline Nanoantennas for light emission by inelastic tunneling F. Bigourdan Controlling spontaneous Scattering by a dense emission with a cloud of cold atoms plasmonic resonator B. Habert N. Schilder 11 Nanoantennas for light emission by inelastic tunneling Can we overcome quenching ? 12 13 What is the gap plasmon mode ? 500 nm 800 nm 14 Emission with a nanocylinder antenna 15 Where is the improvement coming from ? 16 Nanoantenna design rules Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 233001 (2012) Akselrod et al., Nature Nanophotonics 8, p 835 (2014) Bigourdan et al., Opt. Exp. 22, 2337 (2014) Kern et al., arxiv 1502.04935 17 Suppressing blinking of quantum dots B. Habert Collaboration: B. Dubertret, ESPCI 18 Plasmonic nanoresonator The gold nanoshell serves as a nanoantenna Collaboration: B Dubertret (LPEM) B. Ji et al., Nature Nanotechnology 10, p 170 (2015) 19 + - + B. Ji et al., Nature Nanotechnology 10, p 170 (2015) - 20 Colloidal Quantum Dots Blinking Collaboration: B Dubertret (LPEM) 21 Decay acceleration Charged exciton (trion) Neutral exciton 160 ns 80 ns 20 ns B. Ji et al., Nature Nanotechnology 10, p 170 (2015) 22 Is it a Purcell effect ? 23 Blinking suppression Charged exciton (trion) Neutral exciton 160 ns 80 ns 20 ns The gold nanoshell supresses the blinking B. Ji et al., Nature Nanotechnology 10, p 170 (2015) 24 Plasmonic resonator The gold nanoshell increases the stability of the QD: B. Ji et al., Nature Nanotechnology 10, p 170 (2015) 25 Collective effects in light scattering N.J. Schilder, C. Sauvan, J.P. Hugonin, A. Browaeys, Y. Sortais, F. Marquier Laboratoire Charles Fabry, Institut d’Optique, Palaiseau (France) 26 System of interest 1 μm ~ l Dense cloud of ~ 1 - 500 atoms Random atom distribution n 3 »1 27 Conditions to observe optical resonant dipole-dipole interactions 1. Dense sample: or λ ~1 μm 1. Dipole energy dominates temperature: T < 100 μK (G ~ 1 MHz) Laser cooled atomic gases Experiments with large (106 - 109) and optically thick cold samples T. Bienaimé et al., PRL 104, 183602 (2010) H. Bender et al., PRA 82 011404 (2010) Chalony et al., PRA 84 011401 (2011) Balik et al., PRA 87, 053817 (2013) 28 • Spontaneous emission (low excitation regime) • Scattering of light (low excitation regime) 29 Spontaneous emission What is the influence of collective effects on the spontaneous emission rate in the presence of strong interactions? 30 Wigner-Weisskopf theory Hamiltonian of the system: Atom-photon coupling constant Fixed polarization s+ along the cloud axis. No rotating Wave Approximation is made in order to keep all interactions mediated by virtual photons ! (by evanescent waves for nanophotonics people). 31 Wigner-Weisskopf theory Choice of the general form of the wavefunction (low excitation) + Linear system for the eigenstates 32 Wigner-Weisskopf theory Choice of the general form of the wavefunction (low excitation) + Linear system for the eigenstates Discussion: i) The system is identical to the classical picture ii) The near-field vectorial interactions are essential (and therefore no RWA can be performed). Li et al., PRA 87, 053837 (2013) 33 Eigenstates 34 Type 1 and 2 35 Structure of super radiant states 36 Type 3 37 Superradiant polaritonic modes Properties 1. Large decay rate (> 15 G0) 2. All atoms are excited. 3. Spatial structure accounting for the retardation. 4. There are typically 5 superradiant states among 450 states. Why 5 states ? 38 Superradiant polaritonic modes Properties 1. Large decay rate (> 15 G0) 2. All atoms are excited. 3. Spatial structure accounting for the retardation. 4. There are typically 5 superradiant states among 450 states. Why 5 states ? 39 Experimental investigations: weak excitation limit F’ = 3 Δ F=2 F=1 Laser - cooled 87Rb atoms T ~ 100 mK 40 Scattering in the low excitation regime Eill (rn ) = Einc ( rn ) + å G ( rn , rm ) pm m¹n pm = a Eill (rm ) The positions are generated randomly. The calculation is repeated over an ensemble of random realizations. Both the field and the square of the field are averaged. 41 Role of super radiant modes 42 Coherent and incoherent scattering Light scattering by a suspension of latex beads in water. E = E + d E E 2 = E 2 + d E 2 <E> = mean field (ensemble average)= coherent field= collimated field dE = fluctuating field= incoherent field= diffuse field 43 Coherent and incoherent scattering It can be shown that: w2 k ´ k ´ E + eeff ( k, w ) 2 E = 0 c In a diagrammatic approach, the effective permittivity is essentially given by the so-called mass-operator. For dense media, the inclusion of recurrent scattering terms is required. 44 Far-field scattering pattern Coherent scattering Incoherent scattering Most of the light is scattered coherently ! 45 Is Clausius Mossotti formula valid ? e -1 na = e+2 3 46 Order of magnitude analysis Estimate of the permittivity: c " = n s (w ) At resonance: 3l 2 s (w 0 ) = = 6p 2p 2 c "(w0 ) = 6p n 3 47 Effective permittivity 48 Structure of super radiant states 49 Nanoantennas for light emission by inelastic tunneling Controlling spontaneous Scattering by a dense emission with a cloud of cold atoms plasmonic resonator 50