Download Anglická verze kvartonovky

1. English version
Socrates wonderful Universe
Quite unusual: instead of the end, the introduction.
Kvarton‘s universe hypothesis, which I here put forward for consideration, I
think that a sufficiently credible solves century controversy éterists with
relativists. Age-old rivality of the two camps has created an ideological trench
mutual misunderstanding of reality: Relativists failed to causally explain the
existence of such a limit velocity of all the "empty space", nor known dielectric
properties of the "emptiness" - the vacuum. In contrast, éterists can not causally
explain the apparently antagonistic properties of "their" ether: the ability to
transmit electromagnetic. waves and the highest frequencies. Which is often
associated with ultra-high-density hypothetical aether particles, bat with zero
resistance while material bodies passing through this ultradense environment.
Socrates's solution to all of these views is the ambivalence of both a new
perspective on the relationship of material objects and physical fabric of space.
This view formulates the following definition:
Matter appears always whenever is locally disrupted the balance of parity
elements of the structure of the physical vacuum
This is the alpha kvarton‘s physics! This concept don’t make spekulation of yet
unknown properties of the internal structure protoelements as fundamental
elements of the structure of the vacuum. Just based on pragmatic observation
that these protoelements have the ability to materially affect themselves and
bonded together to create the system. Ideal internally bound, with total harmonic
system of mutual saturation of the material effects of four antipodean
protoelements kvarton is still hypothetical, as the basic unit of space of our
material, palate 'universe. Therefore kvarton basically Socrates protophysics.
Fatal error postlorentz‘s physics, which have shifted to contemporary
physics physmatics to physmystics was confusing interpretation of results M-M
interferometer. The error, however, at the time stemmed from very vague to the
mystical concept of the ether as filling space. At that time the concept of the
ether, as foreign material, immaterial substance, without any causal links and
organic material objects could lead to a correct understanding of M-M
experiment. When was the idea of the then primitive physicists around the globe
flying the solid with ether after planetary orbit must be measured so called ether
wind. The negative result of the experiment M-M, ended general feeling
frustration century physicists and felling pillars of physics. In their apology, it
should be noted that the material had no clue about the nature and structure of
the gravitational field. They understood that hypothetical gravitational field
"accompany" each body as it moves through space, but did not realize that along
with rotating outer layers of the body structure as well as the globe rotates
gravitational field. It is obvious that this rotating gravitational environment in
which electromagnetic waves are spreading, showed Michelson interferometer
to firmly associated with the rotating surface of the globe is no "ether wind".
Luminiferous environment and the structure of the gravitational field body
Michelson interferometer were to each other in peace! A completely different
situation is Sagnacův experiment. There is evidently a local motion of rotating
equipment to Sagnacova Light Conductive structure of the gravitational field.
And therefore also happens MM experiment was missing: the shift of
interference fringes, proportional relative motion Sagnacova device to structure
gravipole! It is similar in experiments Fizeaua. Here, the light moves in the
aquatic environment, which itself moves against its locally penetrating structure
gravipole. Therefore, there is a shift of interference fringes. However, there is a
complete "entrainment" of light speed movement of water molecules, but only to
an extent which corresponds to a space filled box material molecules and the
"empty" space between them due to gravity, (which the molecules move, and it
is light propagated axial velocity c) . (Another type of "evidence" that there is no
ether was an attempt by physicists Trouton and Noble with a charged capacitor.,
Even here there is no factual charged capacitor plates move towards gravipole
structure, which is necessary for the emergence of "additional" magnetic field
with which the calculated T + N).
Einstein's idea of total relativity fyzikálií for decades froze and suppressed
fundamental research material structure of the vacuum. When it became
relativistic models of relations and in particular the interactions between
elementary particles unsustainable, Einstein invented the earliest followers of
wave mechanics, later promoted to quantum. A mystical physics occurred in the
virtual. Mr. Heisenberg sanctified virtuálům their limited existence, according to
the model dressed / undressed and conservation laws given to tails'; course
within the Heisenberg uncertainty. Real particles could arbitrarily short time to
"produce" any tangible, but the device "elusive", thus virtual particles and at the
same time is also absorb. About sensible person asks: why? Why should real
elementary particles of its own material substance produce and emit in all
directions cloud virtual photons every conceivable weight just to get exchanged
with another woman, even extremely remote elementary particle of his slight
impulse? What part of the continuous emission spectrum "produced" photons hit
the remote particle? What's more: who and what mechanism returns the
unimaginably vast mass of unused virtual photons back to the emitting particle,
as speculated czech academician Ivan Úlehla? This senseless antifyzikum
caused Einstein negation of existence real material structure of the physical
vacuum. His adherence to the tenets of reciprocity relativistic effects dilation
and contraction, and the absence of absolute motion to the material structure of
the vacuum. The superiority of relative motion as the only objective category of
movement. If they are made in the future, initially unmanned interplanetary
flights by nearlylight speeds, I believe that they will be on their decks conducted
experiments proving the existence of asymmetric increased rest body weight to
the structure of the vacuum actually is moving. Whatever changes the frequency
with known Cepheids or direct physical experiments aboard proving asymetii
mass field objects. (For more about the nature of these future experiments in the
main text).
Socrates kvarton‘s hypothesis space transparently and fairly causally explains
the physical nature of gravity without speculative, immeasurable folding space.
Logically explains the so-called wave-particle 'behavior of elementary particles
without the necessary mathematical "crutch" - the wave function and its
antikauzálního collapse. Illustrates the physical nature of the movement of all
elementary particles and their mutual interactions without the help of Virtual
mystical of all kinds, as well as so-called "break-up" and the transformation of
elementary particles, without the intermediate boson, without birth and
annihilation. In Socrates physics four real material objects - protoelementy-not
expire or is not born, according to circumstances, only changing the form of
their mutual coexistence. To describe the world needs now several hundred
various ways diversified called elementary particles, or multiple colors,
redolence, and weirdness of quarks, nor need renormalisation endless physical
values resulting from the postulates of QED and GTR neider relativistic
paradoxes of STR. The whole kvarton physics for a description of the "world" is
sufficient to four invariant, ie, "eternal" material protoelements with three types
antipodity whose physical properties are not transferable. All this applies in
particular to protophysics the structure of space and material elementary
particles. Follow-physics of atomic nuclei, atoms, molecules, solid state physics
and applied physics in all fields remain in effect unchanged. Physics kvarton‘s
universe does not yet have enough experimental information on the morphology
and internal structure of four basic protoelements whose existence postulates.
Pragmatically it can be assumed that they are material objects subnuclear size
(Rq <10-18 m) presumably spherical shape with a direct link to the material
expected subkvarton structure of space, which mediates interactions between
neighboring protoelements and kvartons. About this substructure physical
vacuum (subkvarton‘s "ocean" = 2. basement), it is premature to speculate
somehow without relevant new experimental data. This will need to be further
"dive" into the depths kvarton‘s "sea". Perhaps the one, perhaps inadvertently,
contribute ongoing massive "cutting and splitting" kvarton vacuum structure in
ever bigger accelerators. They realize that all those scientists' experiments at
these massive "blindfolded" is? I do not think that their naive "demolish" the
structure of the vacuum to be launched chain dismantling of the entire universe,
but yet never be too careful, right? What if that kind of a non-binding, playing
'once someone started the Big Bang?
Sequence
1 Adjustable current Misunderstood
2 Kvartony, kvartony, all very kvartony
3 Ether versus kvartony
4 paradoxical paradoxes
5 Kingdom of metaphysics - virtuals
6 Elementary Particles is when ...
7 Where wears elem. The mass particles?
8 Crazy promiscuity elem. particles
9 Everyone wears a uniform charge10 Mysterious games on doubleslot
11 Adventures in Harvard water tower
12 What Cepheids tell us?
13 Public Secrets Core
14 Gravimony
15 Grated "remote" of photons
pages
4
10
14
15
21
24
29
31
40
41
43
45
45
47
48
And now just a couple of really opening sentences:
After reading the book Lee Smolin, Physics in trouble, I remembered
particularly those of his original idea: „the problem of the foundations of
quantum mechanics can be considered as the second major problem of modern
physics, it is necessary to address the issues of quantum theory either finding a
clear interpretation of the present theory, or finding a new theory "(...)
"Quantum mechanics, at least in the form in which it was originally formulated,
it is difficult to reconcile with realism " (...) " One way to remedy is:
Discovering a deeper theory that will provide a better understanding of nature
than quantum mechanics. The fact is that the problem remains unsolved! It is not
enough just to find a new way to understand quantum theory. Those who
originally formulated it, they were not realists." (...) "Just as the apparent
smoothness of the surface of the water surface conceals the fact that matter is
composed of discrete atoms, and the smoothness of space probably is not
realistic. Arises as an approximation of something deeper that is composed of
basic units ... Some approaches simply assume that space is made up of discrete
elements."
So this is for me the most important essence of the ideas physicist-theorist Lee
Smolin. His thoughts I think therefore (without permission) borrowed the header
of some chapters. And so I just sighed: That it took, sir, I do with those your
"discrete elements of space," communicate "more than 20 years. What if yours
yet unnamed, building units of space ', we will called simply kvartons? You ask
me why? Well, that is my whole long story. But let's gets we nice, from Adam '.
.
On the way to the depths of the vacuum
Part I.
Space, the bottomless ocean of kvartons
For centuries dominated the physics of this very simple idea: the whole world is
made up of a solid or liquid material substance, coated with something so rare,
that through it some how it can comfortably walk. And all this, apparently
freely, lying around 'in bleak empty space, in short, like ‚Something' in Nothing.
Physics (except inflamed éteristů) course primarily interested in it Something
tangible. And when we remove from our all matter of space, so it's Something
we are left only empty, intangible and really useless space. Deep Nothing. So
this might somehow be true since the time of Aristoteles and that's true,
unfortunately, in many places today. Only somewhat strange behavior of
emptied 'space when inserted into "the bone" bare mass, such as elementary
particles with an electric charge, forced a bit of physics change their ideas and
call the "empty space", to be sure, the physical vacuum. It definitely sounds
better, and know that even more scientific. But also: "What if one found that the
empty space is not so completely empty". Maybe some of them even suspected
that with the "empty" emptiness is not everything in order that it might
something more "is." Well, knowing, knowing, but Einstein's Special Theory of
Relativity (STR) to them, under the threat of eternal damnation, commanded
consider the existence of something that could, albeit sketchily, to be material, ie
material, Universal System. Any material US Einstein had been given "forever"
to the ban.
So physicists prefer to stay with their parochial nonsense surrounding the
paradoxes special relativity, paradoxically explained and mutually assured that it
simply no other way. (See Section botched paradoxes). Physicists had the right
to ignore this more ancient knowledge of physics on the specific behavior of the
vacuum?
What physicists have overlooked, or secret displacement current.
Misunderstood phenomenal discovery: sliding electric current
Long before the publication of Einstein's doctrines STR, physicists was known
physical phenomenon called inconspicuously: sliding elektric current.This
unobtrusive and purely pragmatic name for the phenomenon, as the appendix of
Maxwell's equations, covering misunderstood genius of the epochal discovery.
For the ignorant only a short description: The circuit power source is the chassis
plate of capacitor. Physicists at the old experiments with him noticed that when
the capacitor is charged by an electric charge, appears in the space between the
plates measurable vortex magnetic field surrounding the entire cross section of
space between the plates. The same vortex magnetic field (but with the opposite
vector H) can be measured even when it is discharging this capacitor. Both
magnetic fields are exactly the same as any normal magnetic field around the
wire which the capacitor is charged and discharged. It can therefore be no
danger to declare that the vortex magnetic field around the wire, continues in the
space between the plates, creating along the circuit, source - capacitor, toroidal
continuous "tube" of magnetic field. This is by no means surprising;
experiments with dielectric bodies embedded between the plates origin of
magnetic fields in them confirmed and we knows why.
Remarkably, however, is that it does not matter if it is between the capacitor
plates a dielectric substance, or a totally blank, fixed space, i.e. real and genuine
vacuum. In dielectrics, it was clear: the change in voltage on the plates of the
capacitor in parallel changes the size of the dielectric polarization, which is
caused by a classic counter-shift bound electric charges in the dielectric. (In fact,
it is just a spatial displacement of negatively charged electrons) And when you
move charge, so always around their track "turns" the vortex magnetic field.
There is no problem: it is as plain as day. But what an empty vacuum? Why
there also appears vortex magnetic field? Indeed, according to the classics,
relativists there is nothing material, let alone a bond electric charges!
Instead of the physicists say, beware!, There is also something about moving!
They resolved that it simply creates a magnetic field around variable
electrostatic field. Yes, sure there is, but that's only half of the truth. For the
truth is necessary to ask: what is actually different of ‚empty' space in which it is
distributed electrostatic field from the same area without that elektrostatic field?
Or else, what changes in the empty space when I put into him an electric charge?
Classics replies: creates an electric field around it. I‘ll ask: what physical
process has creates an electric field? Or: What are the specific changes in that
space? What will be the classic answers? He does not know, just there,
somehow, came after inserting the electric charge.
This is not a serious answer of physics 21st century! It is time to tell what is the
nature of the electric field in a vacuum. About dielectrics we know: when we are
approaching electrical charge to it, just move inside him bound electric charges
(electrons) and their movement around it arises naturally magnetic field. Yeah,
this is quite simple. Therefore would‘nt be reasonable to assume that the
vacuum is a kind of dielectric and that it also contains something bound electric
charges? We knew a long time ago, by Professor Rydnik, that the electric charge
embedded in, clean 'vacuum, this vacuum polarized. (See the following thoughts
V.I. Rydnik) Polarizing something does from time immemorial in physics is
somehow move the electrical charges contained in it Something! What is it that
moves in vacuo at its polarization when polarizing means to move the cartridge?
Is anyone able to guess this? Nature already knows it, but people are the last
people blind. It is high time to stick his head out of the sand! No one else do it
for us! Therefore, I offer to all, so far only led to believe that the vacuum is
filled with something, the way Dirac‘s ocean and Smolin’s "building" objects
vacuum, but not in a state of negative energy Dirac as once expected, but the
real material objects. In the ideal case of zero external physical condition of
these material objects containing four basic elements of matter, two of which
bear the antipodean elementary electric charge. Due to the content of the four
elements Socrates called these, yet hypothetical objects kvartons. Meanwhile us,
going on to describe the accompanying "displacement current" is sufficient to
assume that a pair of mutually coupled electric charges inside kvartons the
electrical charges on the capacitor plates pulled out of their positions in spherical
kvartons. Ball shape all kvartons changes with this stretches along the line
connecting the capacitor plates. (From a football ball becomes a rugby ball).
And it is this spatial transformation from spherical shape of kvarton balls to oval
balls represents the (polarization) movement of electrical charges within
kvartons
When the charges promenades
Whole this "shake up" of charges descripts the following two charts
illustrate:
The following chart shows what happens in the space between the
capacitor plates inside those hypothetical buildings of vacuum - in
kvartons, when its charging and discharging
This graph shows three possible stages polarization of kvartons state between
the plates, depending on the size of the charge on the plates. In the left is part of
the charging phase, in the middle is phase of the fully charged capacitor and in
the right is phase of gradual discharge of a capacitor. Size kvartons polarization
is illustrated graphically in sizes ovality kvarton . The charging and discharging
curve is indicated for clarity continuous state of polarization (ovality) of only
one sample kvarton in the space between the plates, but exactly the same time
course of polarization affects all kvartons in that space.
Percentage phased course of charging the capacitor size and polarization of
kvartons between the plates, depending on the amount of charge on the
plates.
From both graphs it is evident that the physical nature of the electric field
between the capacitor plates is the polarization (P) of all kvartons in this area.
The electric field E corresponds directly proportional to the size of kvartons
polarization, as is evident from the charge curve of the upper graph, with
increasing (decreasing) charge Q on the plates increases (decreases) kvartons
polarization P and its electric field E between the plates. (P → E). And finally
we come to a sliding Maxwell displacement current, I(slide), the voltage U(slide)
Feed rate around which it creates a mysterious variable magnetic field in a
vacuum ..
The relationship between the variables Q, E and P expresses relationship: P =
kE = kQ. Between the charging and discharging phases (capacitor) may be
arbitrarily long phases with zero displacement current, ie, when the size of the
charge on the plates change, which does not alter the degree of polarization
kvartons; charge in kvartons change their position, and therefore do not move in
this state the magnetic field is zero.
If this capacitor is connected to a circuit sinusoidal alternating current, the
charging phase continuously changes in discharge and on the contrary.In space
between the capacitor plates when it is real, alternating current of charged
particles (protoels), but only within kvartons. Nevertheless, around this inner
kvartons "stream" is magnetic field
The following figure shows a possible arrangement of four material inside
protoelements in kvarton. The left: neutral (Hubs undirected, null and void)
kvarton, followed longitudinally polarized kvarton and then electrically
generated series of longitudinally polarized kvartons. Eg. between the plates of a
charged capacitor
First, the ball of kvarton chaotically oriented in space. Then, when you insert a
small voltage on the plate orientation occurs in protoels in kvartons connectors
in the direction boards. The following is a distinct movement of electrons in the
connecting wires to the plates and the tension (stress intensity color illustrated
boards) on them gets larger polarization kvartons. (Must be highlighted in
motion protoels in kvartons and their growing ovality). Could somehow
represent the magnetic field between the plates. Followed by a constant
polarization phase during which the magnetic field vanishes. He then
discharging phase (in the conductors are moving electrons). Kvartons
depolarization phase occurs, ie a return protoelů in kvartons back into position
null and void which will then reappeared mag field between the plates.
(One gets here).
Moscow professor of physics, V.I. Rydnik, considering the following: "The
cosmic vacuum ocean surrounding each real electron can be in its immediate
surroundings away from him slightly, while the positive ocean closer to him as
well. If the vacuum still electrically neutral, then in the real presence of the
electron is the hub homogeneity somewhat disrupted and a condition called
vacuum polarization, which is subject to local deformations described positive
and negative ocean ".
What manners electron dropped into a vacuum
V.I. Rydnik basically a direct connection to the vacuum polarization electric
field implies when he says, "by inserting el. charge in a vacuum, this vacuum is
polarized and of course there "arose" and proportional to the electric field
polarization. " Thus, even according to professor Rydnik, and others, are the
creation and vacuum polarization electric field in the space around electrical
charge two parallel and identical happening.
V.I. Rydnik anger, fears, however the highest authorities of physics and thus
obscures reality: instead of discrete local real idea microobjects electric bound
carrier. Charges inside the rather vague fantasizes about integers, the oceans'
electrically charged, which is said to somehow close to electric charge opposite
to each move. But the buck passing completely avoid natural question that
occurs to everyone: the substance of what is the ocean?! What is the
consistency? It was absolutely rygid when it moves to a monolithic whole, or by
the embedded electric charge? As in this case in the area of "pass", or two
mutually permeate space monoliths with electric charge? Now imagine that
there is some space, scattered 'several of the same charges. Where are the poor
man charged ocean throws first?! Nope this way is not the way! This idea was
limping on all fours! Punch is still bursting out of the bag. It is time to see the
truth. '
What it whispers in our vacuum?
Has anyone ever wondered what happens physically structural place in empty
space when it creates or changes the mysterious electric field?
However since this Rydnik's unfortunate ideas displacement, charged oceans 'as
well as by Dirac‘s, ocean electrons with negative energy' was only a small step
to understanding that the entire universe is filled with real sub-microscopic
material objects in which they are together bound material bearers electric
charges, as in the dielectric material! Unfortunately, physicists seem to have legs
tied, they are not able to do this step! Even wise Lee Smolin is not yet able to
figure out his, heretical 'thoughts! It is most logical that, like in dielectrics mass
in the vacuum ‚dielectric' between the plates must occur during the charging and
discharging, the counter-movements, not any, charged oceans' as Rydnik raves,
but quite real carriers of positive and negative electric charges. Real electric
charges, real Smolin bound in the basic structural units of suspected area. That
even around these internal movements of electrical charges creates a magnetic
vortex field they already know. Yes, it can be simply and elegantly explain the
existence of a variable magnetic field between the plates, without crutches
"intangible" fluid-electric field. It is interesting that no one from established
physicists interested in what is the material nature of the electric field! They
contented themselves with saying that it is a state of the material field in empty
vacuum. They created a formula, this "field" mathematically describe the
material but the essence of the "field" no corcern Them. It was enough to realize
well-known reaction of the vacuum to embedded electrical charge. The result is
both a polarization of vacuum and simultaneous formation of an electrostatic
field in it. 1 +1 is often the second Also in kvartons vacuum it applies: moving
carriers of electric charges inside kvartons null and void from their positions
causes the longitudinal polarization of vacuum, called the electrostatic field and
displacement current with the magnetic field around it. Everything is connected
to everything! It should just realize that the electrostatic field is nothing more
than a polarized vacuum, ie opposite electric charges move from zero positions
within kvartons. Going back to the question raised above: what is actually
different between ,empty' space in which there is an electrostatic field and the
same area without this field? Now it's clear: space without electric field have not
polarized the Smolins hypothetical "basic building blocks", while the area with
an electric field has a polarization proportional to the intensity of the electric
field. It is clear how the Sahara.
It is certainly equivalent to speak of either variable electrostatic field, or variable
polarization of the vacuum. However, the polarization of the vacuum building
elements are, in contrast to the concept of electric field, the logical base
material! The material essence of building elements vacuum polarization
(kvartons), we can (manually) to convince, in immaterial existence in the
electrostatic field we just have to believe. It offers the following relationship: the
intensity of the electrostatic field in vacuum E = P, which is the degree of
polarization of kvartons. Along with decreasing polarization, ie, with the return
of bound electrical charges to positions in kvartons null and void, shall lapse and
electric fields in this area; And this polarizing movement of electrical charges
within kvartons, coupled with the existence of a variable magnetic field can be
experimentally detected. All those mysterious physical fields (electric, magnetic
and gravitational) get in kvarton model of vacuum (KMV) "tangible" material
form, it is always induced deformation and configuration "building blocks"
vacuum - kvartons. It is simply a "blacksmith" physics.
However, it is quite humanly incomprehensible and inexcusable that physicists
then this undeniable fact in the study of the structure of the vacuum ignored.
They would then have been come to the understanding that in a vacuum, similar
in material dielectrics, although there must be "invisible" (as well as those
electrons in dielectrics), but the real, material objects, which contain bound,
carriers of electric charges. We can only imagine what it would mean for the
development of physics. Physics would have walked completely different way!
Would avoid the embarrassing rape Einstein's STR and late dilemmas QED,
including mystical and ridiculous virtuals. What had actually bothered physicists
vacuum in the recognition of the existence of material objects? Their
invisibility? Even our old familiar atoms are also only invisible carriers of
electric charges Although invisible to the naked eye, yet safely, we know that
they exist and that they are full of real, electrically bonded carriers of electric
charges. And imagine that these "our" atoms are at least 7 orders of magnitude
greater than the hypothetical vacuum-kvartons objects. We'll still amazed that
they are invisible and our technical means are indistinguishable? Although, in
fact, that a variable magnetic field between the capacitor plates do witnessed and
therefore measurement visibility 'real existence of electrical charge carriers in
vacuo. Like the trail of tiny bubbles in the Wilson chamber. So to summarize:
flowing through the circuit in which the capacitor is connected an electric
current varies between its plates, the electric field intensity. But we already
know that the electric field is just another name for a set of polarized, the
material elements of the vacuum-kvartons. Due to the variable size of the
electric charge Q on the capacitor plates with different electrical charges bound
in the "invisible" objects-kvartons vacuum between plates move towards each
other and that they move in opposite polarization around them naturally
generates real, ie measurable magnetic field. Proven existence of a variable
magnetic field between the plates is a flagrant proof of the existence of real
bound electric charges in the physical vacuum! Already own this indisputable
evidence should "dig" all of physics vacuum. Unfortunately, it remains free of
ice! Why this many experiments demonstrated the reality of mainstream
physicists consistently ignored?
Even the ‚wood‘ physicists, starting with Maxwell, who long ago observed
phenomena between the plates, a phenomenon called the Maxwell displacement
current. I.e., knowing there any movement, shifting! So why did the later,
postrelativists are so dumb?!
Allegorical representation of the displacement current work in the vacuum
polarization and depolarization.
The two strongmen, raping kvartony 'are electric. charge on the capacitor
plates
But it was not always so "free of ice." For centuries before anticipated genius
Michael Faraday, that all matter together, despite the seemingly empty space,
something touching and physical influences. Even when he knew nothing about
atoms, elem. particles, etc. suspected that between the bodies solid phase must
be some corresponding physical environment that allows bodies direct physical
contact. But how these undisputed evidence the presence of weight in a vacuum
combined with implacable Einstein's idea of an empty, intact area, where him
directed the Michelson-Morley experiment.? It was once again a step back into
an almost obsolete ancient paradigm: Something in Nothing. In this respect, it
can only say that Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity its long "floored"
research and knowledge of the structure of the vacuum, this "stage" anthropic
physics. Its great authority to us for a long time "cut steps" to the "basement" of
world. Instead of material environment interaction between material objects,
Einstein attributed material objects only questionable ability to somehow "bend"
geometry of empty space. It is absolutely no transparent and physically
meaningless: his material material object action (other does not) affects
intangible, abstract concept, geometry of space! Where it slipped physics?
To the physical magic? And I just ask you today koryfejs physics: How to bend
intangible, abstract geometry of space, the thought constructs that have created
and introduced the human men, as well as the coordinate system, only the
mathematical description of space? Does this mean that in the area between
material bodies bend imaginary geometric lines, the intangible lines? But if a
material effect on the geometry of space is accepted (but with the condition that
the material has effect again only and only on the material), it is then necessary
to admit to a material space "filler" discontinuous structural form, which
actually was not even in conflict with my view of the world. This, however,
Einstein categorically ruled: for him is the only intangible space, geometricmathematical structures; 'intangible bottomless pool' with twisted lines. Pity,
knowledge laws of the material world could be a mile further!
The question therefore no longer worth so when if in vacuo is real carriers
of electric charges, but what form and structure hes those still hypothetical
objects in ,ocean vacuum'. This will be the content of another part Kvarton’s
model of vacuum KMV.
Vacuum, as a kvarton spawn of the world.
Lee Smolin: ... Some approaches simply assume that space is made up of discrete elements ...
I have no problem affirming this view. The above described principle of
displacement current leads straightforwardly to the existence of such discrete
elements, which assumes Smolin. Robert Feynman once called phenomenon
interference elemementary particles on the doublespot, the heart of quantum
electrodynamics' (QED). (Even the so-called quantum phenomenon will be later
explained in the kvarton‘s model). The same law should be marked to
phenomenon of displacement current, the heart of vacuum physics'. This
phenomenon is principally instructive for understanding the physical structure of
the vacuum. Because we know that the magnetic field is generated around a
moving electric charges (nobody so far failed to reverse, because the variable
external electric field is a result of ongoing changes in the polarization of the
vacuum elements considered above speech), look for the answer in the vacuum
actually moves. Yes, we've already said, they are generally mechanical motion
of electric charges inside kvartons. But who are the real hub carrier material and
what is the degree of freedom? If the hypothetical electric charges in vacuum
were completely free, no-ties, about how QED postulates the existence of short-
living 'free virtual cartridge pairs would create in the whole area, instead
polarisated dielectric vacuum electrolyte and we would never have the renowned
capacitor recharged! Believe me! Even the obligatory conductive ball, that him
once used fyzicus to their attempts at the beginning of the discovery of
electricity. Free virtual electric charges in space by these electrically charged
props immediately neutralized. But this is obviously not the case! Free virtual
particle with an electric charge in a vacuum, to the liking of QED are therefore
unsustainable, unrealistic fiction! Would be transformed in vacuum to
conductive electrolyte. That would be the end of all electrical and electronics!
Hypothetical electric charge carriers in vacuum must be somehow tied in
something, something that limits their movement, which logically explains why
the vacuum behaves as a dielectric, and not as an electrolyte. The key instrument
QED - Virtual-is, in terms of the behavior of the displacement current
physically unrealistic.
This requires a completely different model than the vacuum presents us with
QED. Described illogicality virtual model of QED vacuum leads me to the idea
that physical real vacuum form contents plenty of discrete, real, material objects
containing, inter alia, el-bound carriers charges of both polarities. (Think here on
wishful awaited building blocks vacuum Lee Smolin) These carriers have
known from classical physics unit electrit charge Q is nontransferable and whole
his "life" connected with its carrier. It is reasonable to assume that each building
unit of the hypothetical vacuum contains at least two carriers antipolarities
electric charges, which, if basic, ie totál bound (void,) state, completely
neutralize each other outwardly polarizing effect of their charges. But
themselves if, for example, between the plates of charged capacitor start, hold
'their work: The effects of accumulating charges on the capacitor plates, these
carriers vacuum cartridges void if spread out from their positions inside the
vacuum material objects in the direction of both the plates and orient all Charge
these objects in the direction joining the two charging plates. (Detail not shown
in Figure: Phase diagram of polarization kvartons). The structure of wt. Object
vacuum between the plates is polarized in this way, ie it has proven character
dielectric. The fact Backward (polarization) of the movement of objects within
the vacuum hubs already know that around the axis of the movement creates a
space vortex magnetic field. We've already say it before. Olredy very existence
of the displacement current and the magnetic field around him, requires that
each one Smolins, building element vacuum 'contained at least two carriers
electric charge.
However, for reasons of universality, which I will explain later, it is essential
that the underlying object each vacuum contained but two antipodean carriers of
electric charges, two more elements together Antipodean with no electric
charge, so they are within each kvarton total of two antipodean pair, four basic
protoelements material, for short - protoels. If there are four, namely kvartons.
One antipodean pair protoels has an electric charge (Q +, Q-) and forms a group
P. Antipodean second pair without charge creates group N) .. According to my
stubborn idea that ifinite set of kvartons, like renowned diracovský "boundless
and bottomless ocean" filled with high density and homogeneity of all our
known universe. In an ideal, homogeneous, space, called Euclidean, with all its
kvartons found in the basic energy autostable, void, ie the state. Then kvartons
are mutually self-similarity, indistinguishable, their physical activity outside of
its volume is zero, because inside kvarton in subcritical volume dVkrit, there are
four kvadrupodean protoelements, or protoels, (pp'nn ') in mutual kvadrupodean
"Nails" by the three antipodal links , between four protoely has antipodean mass,
charge and group. When all 4 basic protoels is located within the subcritical
volume kvarton, dWkrit, all 3 types of mutual antipodean saturated and
externally neutralized and their resulting external physical effects M, is null and
void because it is saturated (saturated) the internal triple bond.
(Do I have to write that all four protoels have unit M bounty material effect on
its surroundings. Slight difference between the values M of N Grupo and Grupo
P will explain later). Hence an important lesson: For external "world", ie
outside kvarton his null and void volume, dWkrit these basic vacuum
physical objects do not exist, because it does not materiallyfunction about
him! Exist in physics is materially influence their surroundings, thereby
altering its physical state. The material function of protoels is in kvarton
model's of vacuum the basic axiom! It is an elementary physical manifestation
protoels, satisfying the definition of the objective existence of matter. But, as I
wrote before, all the material effects of four protoels the void, kvarton is
concentrated (saturated) to the volume dWkrit. Outside this subcritic
volume is material effect of protoels zero! However, this is an ideal situation
kvartons ideally Euclidean space, which in the real universe, fortunately for us,
nowhere absent. The universe as we know it exists only because it is not
Euclidean, that perfect homogeneity and external nullity kvartons is something
disturbed. What and how is a homogeneous ideal structure kvarton's "sea"
disturbed will discuss in following chapter of kvarton's physics.
.
But back to describe the structure of kvartons. Two mass antipodes, protoels of
group P (denoted by (p) (p ') are themselves also hub antipodes (Q +, Q-). Two
mass antipodes, protoels group N (n) (n') are without charges. Hub (symbols
antipodes are denoted by an apostrophe). Now comes across Novum of KMV
and physics at all: Both protoels of groups P, ie (p). (p '), are antipodes to both
protoels of group N (n), (n'). (Later I will describe to you how exactly this
group‘s P-N antipoditys is the cause of nuclear "forces"). Ideal external nullity
of kvartons can disturb, however, interfere with each outer uncompensated
elevator weight, charge’s and group‘s action, which, if sufficiently intense, it
may "break away" from each kvarton protoels, which can then form the class of
free kvarton‘s protoels - vakants. Uncompensated weigt effects of these free
protoels (vakants) has on neighboring kvartons but sadly destructive effect: they
disrupt their external nullity by causing spatial "lifting of“ the null and void
from their protoels dVkrit volumes and thus deformed kvartons. Such null and
void from Euclidean "lethargy" excited kvarton is inadvertently by itself
becomes a source of weight effect to their ie not quite compensated protoels to
its neighbors in proportion to its "energizing." Unit physical effects of free
primary M protoel the progressive interaction between mutually adjacent
kvartons stretching increasingly spherical surface around protoel freedom, so
that the rate distortion kvartons, the intensity m is equal to m = M/r2, where r is
the distance of the i-th kvartonu with intensity m excitation from the primary
excitation sources, ie from vakant.The following figure shows how spread
tangible and hub excitation space (kvartons) around the positively charged free
protoel (p). Ratios sizes of individual kvartons excitation not equations for mass
and charge-excitation m = M/r2, respectively q = Q/r2
In addition to mass excitations are here also applies hub polarization shown
colored arched heads protoels (p) and (p ') Own neutral body kvartons are
neutrally colored, beige. It is clear that the largest excitation to has the first
kvartons excitatory skin around protoel (p). Because excitation kvartons has
spherical symmetry, it is possible to keep the center protoel initiation (p), any
number of axes and the image is still the same. The initial uncompensated
protoel (p) in the middle drawings I have called for its structural inadequacy,
the vakant and spherical distortion (excitation) surrounding kvartons I called the
elevator weight vakant field. (Later will explain that the structural vakant can be
by not quite compensated coupled combination of two or more protoel). Vakant
and its spherical mass fields together form a symbiotic spatially stationary
physical system, in classical physics-called elementary particles. Spherical mass
field of excited kvartons represents the sum of the rest mass of that symbiotic.
kvartons size and polarization, not the volume size. In fact, the excitation shows
the interconnectedness of the neighboring protoels and kvartons.
. (Later demonstrate that structural vakantem may not quite be compensated by a
bound system of two or more protoels). Kvartonový space in a wide area
vakantu lost ideal, null and void Euclidean structure, and it excited wt. field,
according to the relation m = M/r2 theoretically extends to infinity. (Here you
can find a physical parallel to the wave function of QED. Unlike basically
mathematical, ie immaterial wave function has the idea of an excited mass field
vakant real physical basis: they will find ways of measuring mass kvartons
excitation field). If in Euclidean space are mutually kvartons nerozlišitelé and
disordered orientation in the field of mass vakant kvartons received the degree
of orderliness spherical mass, respectively. Charge excitations according to the
formula m = M/r2 respectively. q = Q/r2. If there is more space in the vakants
generates, (excites) each vakant its mass field excited kvartons. Therefore all
those vakants materially affects the same space, ie kvartons the same, it is
natural that the substantive effect of arbitrarily large sets vakants the
surrounding spatial field kvartons arithmetically added (summarizes) from each
vakant and creates composite, additive mass makropole, generally known as the
gravitational field. Based on this, it is possible to say that in the universe there
are only somehow aligned and oriented kvartons.Zatímco Einstein assigns each
point gravipole mathematical value tensor, gravitational mass makropole
presents itself at any point size of the local excitation and orientation of all
kvartons. Tensor is purely mathematical quantity, the degree of excitation is
kvarton physical quantity! (Construction and essence gravipole describe later).
Ideal void kvarton, with
total saturation of the weight
disturbed, with free
vakant excited kvarton
Label those drawings: protoely (p) and (n) are stroukless. Strouked are
antiprotoels (p ') and (n'). Protoels group P have marked features of their electric
charges. Grupa N is free of charge.
Kvarton universe versus classical ether and even the principle of relativity
Lee Smolin: „You will need to discover a deeper theory that will provide a better
understanding of nature than quantum mechanics. The fact is that the problem remains
unsolved!“
I have noticed in various physical discussions where I presented Kvarton model
of vacuum this view: the kvarton continuum is actually just dusted ‚good old
'ether. This view did not take into account the direct diametrical difference
between the idea of an infinite set of discrete kvartons and ether. I decided to
include in this paper a substantive comparison of both physical hypotheses.. I
think at first glance, it should be clear what is fundamentally different of kvarton
cosmic universe from historical images from the ether. What have we know
about the ather? Ether, according pre-Lorentz physicists, is structurally vague,
extraneous material (intangible?, Discrete?, Or continuous?) Substance,
oblivious to the classic material objects embedded in the environment ether.
Classic ether and the material objects are not forming any type of physical
custody, physical interaction, or an organic unity. Physicists before Lorentz are
similar only in that the ether is inert, non-material environment. The respectable
description of the basic substance filling the entire universe is pretty small. One
has to ask: can be this historic ether bearer of electric charges? It is supposedly
fixed and motionless. This alone gives a clear answer: He can not! Because it
yet hasn‘t been discovered real intangible carrier eletric charge. If it still existed
in the ether, its immobility could not generate the observed charge-polarization
and magnetic field between the capacitor plates. It is connected only with the
movement of charges. It's hopeless! Still ether even could not be a carrier of
electromagnetic waves, which also require some internal undulatory movement
of "something". Real world of elementary particles is permeated and expressed
motion.Without motion is dead. It is hopeless! Without motion is dead !
Michelson‘s experiment to detect the ether was unnecessary. Ether was already
at that level of knowledge inapplicable. His immobility could not meet the
basic requirement of the wearer electromagnetic waves. Immobility eliminates
any waves in Eater!
But most of all: No relevant theory of ether solve absolutely zero resistance
to the movement of material particles of our world! Kvarton model,
vakuové KMV, to elegantně řeší: známé částice a Socratesovo vakuové
"částice" jsou z jednoho "těsta"Through the kvarton in vacuum are
transmitted only physical attributes of particles, ie weight (excitvacuum ation of
kvartons) and their electrical charge (polarization of kvartons).
With the blade up into the ether?
Space, the "bottomless kvartons ocean" as discrete Smolin’s "building"
elements of vacuum meets the above requirements. All kvartons contains four
mutually coupled protoelements (shortly protoels), two of which have electric
charges of opposite polarity. Kvartons may therefore be electrically polarized by
an internal counter-shift in their bound electrical charge in the external
electrostatic field (see Fig. vacuum polarization between the capacitor plates).
This counter-movement charges bonded inside kvartons may in its surroundings
generate the observed magnetic field of displacement current. No problem!
If is located in the ideal nulit "ocean", of kvartons free protoel, as a vakant, than
is this whole infinite set of kvartons outer by material effect of the vakant
excited. Protoels in neighboring kvartons are pulled out of his from their null
positions in kvartons and polarized. Symbiotic submicroscopic binding agent-tovakant to excited kvartons wraparound "Ocean" is molded integral
complementary macroscopic shape-elementary particle. They are two
inseparable sides of the same coin: vakant and its generated mass, possibly
electrostatic field. There is no real fundamental particles without his agent
and him excited spherical mass field. In this symbiosis submicroscopic vakant
and macroscopic mass field consists the essence of corpuscular and wave
properties of elementary particles. Vakants and their symbiotic mass fields are
created from the same material substance, four types protoelements! There is no
structural similarity between the historical, intangible ether and vacuum
kvarton‘s model elementary particles! It must be emphasized: the real material
objects of our world, elementary particles, don’t squeeze one's way in some
superdense but paradoxically intangible ether, nor rushing ahead! Nor could
they, it still immobility! Motion of objects ether is insoluble Achilles heel of all
theories based on classical ether. Whereas movement of elementary particles
kvarton's field is such that they are transmitted together with the excitation only
the physical attributes of physical objects. A basic property of elementary
particles - the weight is "spread out" in her field as a spherical mass excitations
of kvartons. When moving the mass object is passed between neighboring
kvartons only this material excitation and polarization. The alone vakant walked
trough kvartonsby that way: on one side with the most excited kvarton merge,
creating a short-live 5 protoels configuration. On the opposite side of that
configuration is then separated the other protoel-vakant the same physical
quality. (In detail it shows normal crossing scheme over vakant trough kvarton).
All kvartons in "ocean" remain without motion! Undergo only minor changes in
its volume and physical state as a result of advancing over them the excitation.
For its spatial immobility aren't individual receptors of kvartons external
observable. Objection to kvartons is incompatible with Einstein's special
relativity; kvarton model spatial "bars" introduced into physics by Einstein
cashiered universal reference system, ie the "scaffolding of the world." I deal
with this area, and I found a significant causal cracks in predicates STR. Judge
for yourself:
Botched paradoxes
Biggest rival of KMV is¨nt the "lifeless" idea ether, but Einstein's Special
Theory of Relativity (STR). A. Einstein, after an unsuccessful search ether
(known experiment MM), decided to "save" at risk "ether" physics and
constructed new reference "scaffolding" of the world. He said it all inertial
coordinate systems (CS). All inertial CS are apparently suitable for the
description of physical processes in them. Einstein does not distinguish real
movement which is associated with enlarged overlimits mass of a moving object
(the object), from the apparent motion, relative .. According to Einstein's theory
(STR) physically there is no difference between inertial motion of the spacecraft
and such seeming "countermovement" of the universe to the ship in the opposite
direction. There's the philosophical and physical contradiction: body actually
accelerated, such as a missile, is logically moving also towards surrounding it
(and pervasive) space, which was not physically with the ship accelerated.
While other bodies (stars) in the universe is apparently relatively moving against
the boat with the whole cosmic space. This is, by STR, very logical, because
otherwise there would be no relativistic contraction of space between bodies,
should this empty space along with the stars did not move. STR argues that by
the relative movement of the universe shorts the distance between the elements
stored in this space. That's the problem: can it be Nathing, Emptiness, really
move? Physical movement expresses physically measurable change in the
interim storage elements to other bodies. But how to measure the movement of
empty space? Movement of Nothing?! The empty space is not possible to
indicate the measuring marks!
Relative, but according to STR, physically just as real, the movement of all
objects in the universe is apparently connected with the movement of the whole
cosmic Nothing. As it moves itself, empty, intangible space that knows only
Albert Einstein and maybe even God. Strange is that, according to the STR's are
both these movements physically equivalent. Einstein’s STR had to"built" into
the Lorentz transformation equations (LT) and the assumption of contraction
and time dilation bodies. Without this crutch would lose LT causality. The
consequences of this auxiliary crutches is negatively reflected in many types of
paradoxes: time (dilation) or length (contraction). There were already described
by many, but perhaps the most controversial and also most conclusive proof of
invalidity of the theory of relativistic contraction is the one with the railway
station which just passes sublight speed train. Look how it is with the
contraction and dilation and subjected to some of the "paradoxes" physical
analysis
Docent Jelen, in Article Paradoxess ofs pacetime
(http://aldebaran.feld.cvut.cz/vyuka/prirodovedny_obraz_sveta/clanky/paradoxy.
pdf.).this "paradox", commented as follows: "
The effect is reciprocal. In terms of station is abbreviated train ride, in terms of
train is abbreviated "moving" station ". And on the illustrations in the text are
nicely illustrates how Mr. dispatcher revels that he now traversing the entire
train comes into the station and the train crew in the back says: hell today the
station is a short, or the whole train does not fit here. Yeah, to are paradoxes! A
lecturer Mr. Jelen obviously relies on the fact that it can‘t that shorten station
any real measurements to verify. A must therefore believe Einstein's
formulas.Although Associate Professor Josef Jelen Csc, says that the theory of
relativity reliably used for 100 years, paradoxes arising from it logically and
without discrepancy can‘t explain. And where it goes in the interpretation of
resorting to overt fraud. Certainly, it is interesting that in the "solution" of all
paradoxes relativists himself docent Jelen used to measure lengths,
paradoxically, time. Even where both systems are touching each other during
movement. Eg. wheel with the rail just as the station and train. Why ignore it?
Well, in the "solution" could be applied ‚emergency brakes' STR, relativity of
simultaneity. And with that, can do wonders! When I asked Mr.professor: why
measure the length of objects over time, my question "generously" ignored. He
knows why! I explained to him that it is possible length of the body (the length
of the rail station) quite comfortably be measured simply by measuring wheel,
that the moving 'station (the track) touches and thus provides wheel of the train
in rotation. The length of the station (its rails) can then be calculated simply by
multiplying the length of the wheel circumference number recorded turns of
wheel! Nothing could be more simple! I wrote all this to professor Jelen, the
author of the above article, but is too scared possibility that STR was not correct.
Fell by your idols! I do not understand why relativists hold like glue that stupid
scheme of photographers stationed along the wall of the station and the other
photographers in the windows of the train? Anyone ever thought that the
photographers in the windows of the train have a large spacing between them?.
How could accurately and simultaneously take a picture of the end station? My
cardinal question still is: Why measure the length of the material object over
time?! Sense of the state remains! Are there rotary meter length?! (Observe
sometimes cops at traffic accidents. Maybe, according to the majority opinion of
the nation's they are slow, but quickly measure the length of the measuring
wheel can). Why not take advantage of the fact that the train (bikes) and Station
(rail) in constant touch? We argue that this hypothetical, Einstein's train not fly
through the air. It's ridiculously simple: Vale train wheel on the rail and thus it
objectively measure '. (What an army of photographers?) Just to add a counter
wheel to any speed gear train. To this day no one really happened, Mr.
Professor?! Occurred. There shouldn‘t be! Would have fallen idols. And it does
not forgive! They say: dogs lie what you do not burn! But it burns me and I put
together the whole experiment so that direct measurement of the length of the
"moving" station was possible and transparent for both SS!
This is Socrates' versions of the experiment and train station:
Editing experiment consists of installing a mechanical revolution counter on one
wheel of the train. Counter shall be switched in of laser in device A, located in
the track at the start station and switched off to other laser in device B in the
track at the end of the station. After stopping counter is the final figure for the
number of wheel speed between points A and B, telemetry sent observers to the
railway station and the observer on the train. The described it is clear that both
observers will receive the same information on the number of wheel speed. Both
observers know "resting" length train station (400m) and wagon wheel
circumference (2m). But let's see what they report the revolution counter.
Evaluation: As I said, the counter does necessarily give to the two observers the
same speed because both is a copies of the data from one source. If the length of
station is 400m and wheel circumference 2m, the counter for an observer at the
station, in its rest system S count 200 revolutions, because 400/2 = 200 Nothing
else can be expected if the true physics. But if the real lesson of STR
longitudinal contraction station moving towards the system S' in which the train
is stationary, then it should not count "separately" for the observer on the train
wheel rotation count less than 200 times. Regardless of the speed of relative
motion. Because the station is said longitudinally contracted, (according to the
STR), which will shorten the length of track between positions A and B of the
device, after which the wheels roll train, and of course a "must" in the short
track train wheel to rotate less than 200 times. Eg. for the relative "speed"
station, c = 0.86, where the Lorentz factor γ = 2, the counter should count from
point A to B, only 100 wheel turns! (Station observers said the train shortened to
half its honest resting length). But the dispatcher must supply data for the resting
length of 200 wheel turns. Who can therefore agree with the counter?!
Unfortunately, the counter can provide each of the two observers other
indication, even if he himself begged Einstein!!. The solution is the assumption
that laboriously constructed dogma STR and LT reciprocal contraction of bodies
apparently not!! Station dimensions are constant in all reference systems.
The biggest advantage of this focal length measurement station is that in any
interpretation completely eliminates the data of the time and taken from
relativists hands "terrific" argument - the relativity of simultaneity!
It is therefore no wonder that associate professor Jelen in all three of his
"explanation" of paradoxes in the above article, always consistently compose
phenomenon of relativity simultaneity. While it is easier and more logical length
reciprocate the "moving" object to measure the mechanical contact rotary meter.
Rock defender relativistic contraction may argue that the counter on the way to
the dispatcher may change. The figure on the number of wheel turns can go
through the whole Galaxy, but that its the numeric information about the turns
can not be changed. But even for such trustless I have a simple solution: it
measuring wheel train I will add plain colored spray that will be in operation at
the direction of device A and disengage the device instruction B. Every time the
wheel rotates so that spray heads to the ground strikes the smooth surface of
college track and mark there. Doubting defender STR with dispatcher after
passing train can personally count the spray tracks. Just not until the arrival of
the next train to do. And if he can count, he must count 200 feet. Just because it
has a length of 400 m station. But the observer on the train has no reason to
disbelieve his abacus with which it calmly. And he must count only 100
revolutions, and thus 100 feet on the rail between points A and B, because his
station, according to STR shortened by half to 200m.The old rule of physics
says: theory can be confirmed many times, but just a single experiment, which it
refutes a theory falls. Experiment and train station measured by the wheel train
turns disproves the existence of the phenomenon of contraction the velocity
bodies. Both observers get the same information on the length of the station.
Associate Professor Jelen me trying fatherly 'appease the contraction occurs only
when speeds and in our "slow" world does not occur. No, Mr. Professor,
contraction according to LT if they existed, would have to be adequately
manifest for each non-zero speed. Her measured, then it is just a matter of the
selected measurement techniques, rather than the principle of the existence of
the phenomenon. But the counter wheel speed train really can not give both the
above values of different observers station! The principle can not, for any
nonzero speed! For each v> 0.
That somehow imagines Associate Professor Josef Jelen paradox train and the
station, from the perspective dispatcher at the station and below that, in view of
the conductor in a "stationary" train. I also joined the 3rd part where I "cut"
unnecessary props and leaves a wheel and track, so you can even visually
compare the length of the track between the control points for the counter A and
B from the point of view of both observers.On the first view it is clear that from
the dispatcher is the stretch of track substantially longer and therefore it after
rolling measuring wheel must rotate more times than on the shorter length
"seen" of crew. Specifically, according to input image to be the dispatcher at the
marked section A - B rotate 9x and crew only 5.5 times. But it measuring wheel
is just only one a counter, which also and therefore can not give any other
indication of the speed dispatcher and another crew!!
In particular, the third part of the figure shows the absurdity of Theses STR
about reciprocal contraction lengths of bodies in mutual inertial motion. The
measuring wheel is carried out on the line defined by points A, B, either 180/20
or 110/20 rpm. This is incompatible with real physics!
Twins Paradox
Just goes infamous, proclaimed the principle of time dilation in various CS to
each other with the inertial moving. The best known species is the paradox of
twins. Mountains of paper were described in an attempt to explain this paradox.
Even leading Czech guru and author of Fundamentals of the special theory of
relativity, academic Václav Votruba, claims that both the inertial motions of the
Earth and the spacecraft in terms of relativistic effects interchangeable, so that,
looking ' Earth lags own time ship for earthly time, but, view 'boat on the
contrary, the time of the Earth (and the universe?) said delaying real time against
their own ship. That's obvious nonsense that tA> tB> tA, but what to do?
"Solution" was found! Time Earth is said and really really lags behind its own
time vessel only if their relative motion of inertia. Right! BATV ship turnaround
time, there in outer space is said to Mother Earth dejo things unseen, unheard of!
During this turnaround astro boat when its movement toward Earth apparently
Nonconservative, the time on the remote earth (in the whole universe?) Steeply
up and running, so to catch his supposedly real Earth time delay time to ship.
But that's not all. Countries need time during that turn the ship in addition to get
such a head start for its further delays compared to a ship on its way back again,
inertia, so that when the ship and Earth meet, the ship time was significantly
delayed in time for Earth. Simply, time to time, the Earth ship twice during the
inertia phase has come a flight is late in returning the ship but actually far ahead
of time Earth ship time. Just the Nonconservative, in terms of duration of flight,
ultrakrátkodobá turnaround in the space ship dálavách works wonders! .
Physicists "solve" their illogical paradox acceleration time Earth is at a time
when the ship and the Earth as far apart as you, and who dares to confront each
other?! They set his equation so that with the use the ,emergency brake',
(relativity of simultaneity) to wolf (relativity) will eat and the goat (time Earth
and Universe) remained ‚untouched'.
In orde that I shattered this "crazy" design on real delay the Earth time to the
spaceship and his ‚magical' acceleration during swing ship in deep space, I put
together a thought experiment without of the "key" swing. I went on the
assumption that the comparison of the aging of both twins is not necessary their
physical presence at one point (ie the Earth). For precise confrontation of their
lives more than a comparison of their appearance (hair?), will serve comparing
the twins' biometrics (eg heart rate) recorded during the selected segment
repositioning a ship to Earth and telemetered transported back to the point of
comparison. This can be obtained by this arrangement of the experiment:
From Earth is sent spaceship with one twin towards the planet XY orbiting, say,
star Alfa, which is at a distance of 4.9 ly from Earth .. On this planet in the long
term is a terrestrial landing researchers. The ship is moving at 0.98 c, so she
approaches the planet XY for 5 Earth‘s years from the date of launch. Both
twins are still monitored and summarized device heartbeat. When the ship close
approach to the planet XY than from spaceship will transmitted the telemetry set
of biometric data on astrotwin, but the boat continues uninterrupted inertial
motion farther into space. There is no reason to speed up the time on
earth!!
Researchers sent by e-mail the entire set of data on its home to planet Earth.
There will "load" for 5 years from the ship encounters with the planet, ie 10
years after the launch of the spaceship from Earth.That is all.
Just one little thing: On earth can compare biometric data received from
astrotwin with those of earth, obtained during the first 5 years since launch
spaceship . This corresponds to the time of closest approach the spaceship to the
planet XY and sending the biometric data from astronauts to Earth. Assume that
the average heart rate of both siblings is 80 beats / minute. Thus, 115,200 beats /
day, and 42 048 000/year 210,240,000 over 5 years. It is undisputed that during
the five Earth‘s years, ie since the start of the ship until the time when the
spaceship really misses the planet XY, executed summarily Earth’s twin hearts
demonstrably about 210 million pulses.Now let us calculate how many beats
executed from the start until the missing planet XY twin on the ship? The ship is
moving at 0.98 c which belongs Lorentz factor gamma = 5 . As a result of this
speed movement of the ship is its own time slowed down to 5 x to earthly time,
so on the boat actually elapsed from the start until the encounter with the planet
XY one ship‘s year. The total number of heartbeats astrotwin for 1 ship‘s year
will be 42,048,000 beats. This objectively ship unit data will be recorded
telemetry transmitted to Earth and found to be correct. This difference is the
objective consequence of time dilation in spaceship caused by the real ship
motion (which is responsible for five times uprest weight of everything in the
boat) to the structure of the vacuum, thus kvarton‘s continuum. That's all right.
But according to Einstein's STR astronauts have also said the same right to think
that they had his ship stand motionless in space and speed 0.98 c from the ship
moves Earth (and the entire universe) and, therefore, that the time on the inertial
run away Earth , according to the STR, 5 x slows versus time of sailors. So
from the "start" the Earth until the moment when the "standing" boat just misses
the passing planet XY, (as part of the Universe) is said to expire at the retreating
Earth, according to Mr. Einstein equations, only 1/5 to the ship’s time, ie about
73 days Earth. (73 turns of globe), and thus the heart of the earth twin in this
interval apparently, according to Einstein, not executes 210 million pulses, as
shown by earthly instruments, but only 8,294,400 beats. And this is a
contradiction as hell! In the above described interval defined by changing the
physical position of the ship to the planet Earth and planet XY is said to perform
heart twin on Earth, by, A.E, just over 8 million beats but objective meter next
to the twin recorded 210 million beats. Because in five Earth‘s years, or during
the 1825 turns of globe can not be less! (Airdrop researchers on the planet XY
trap with biometric data confirm that a meeting took place with the boat 5 years
after the launch of the ship from the Earth).
The principle of reciprocity, according to STR, leads to two irreconcilably
paradoxical results: "From the perspective of" cosmonauts say earthly twin
hearts beats in the interval defined by the physical relocation of the ship between
the Earth and the planet XY, due to the time lag Earth, only 8 million beats, but
ground-based instruments are in the same interval 'good 210 million beats.
Relativistic "view" by the astronauts is refuted actually measured values!!
Obviously, without the introduction of swing boat, the design with STR
reciprocity of time dilation is in the anal!. Boat crew hasn‘t causal reason to
believe that it may be inertial motion physically swap counter-reciprocating
motion of the Earth (and the universe) with all relativistic effects on the passage
of time the Earth! Real diatace time (slow internal reactivity of solids) is caused
by a kinetic equivalent, ie, asymmetric, uprest body weight, which secondarily
produces realistic motion of bodies to kvarton’s world "lattice". As it originally
calculated Hendrik Lorentz. Mentioned "paradoxes" only testify that Einstein's
Thesis of physical equivalence of all inertial reference frames and reciprocity
relativistic effects of contraction and dilation is not true.
demons that I fathered, I can not help
Virtuáls – the modern physical mythology
Somewhat different direction went to Einstein's contemporaries and others
followers in an effort to somehow "physically" legalize overt physical
connectivity of the material world. They invented QED and its virtuals disgraceful hybrid reality and Heisenberg‘s fyzmagie. Physical reality is led him
to the realization that submicroscopic elementary particles, despite considerable
mutual remoteness, (due to its size) to yourself somehow physically active.
Must, therefore, in that space between them exist something that mediates this
effect, carry. But it mustn‘t be some form of full material fills the space. This
would not give them their "rabbi physics" let! It is up to deceive virtual, a sort
semireál, seminotreál particles that are not, because normally identifiable, let
alone grasp. Virtuáls are particles that are and are not like. Here, fantasy and
mysticism celebrated a feast. To the detriment of physics.
Just to quote some authority, be it mentioned Moscow professor of physics V.I.
Rydnik: "Owing to process of exchange of virtual photons electron" knows“
despite the existence of empty space his comrade in another location area.
Electron must therefore be able to spontaneously emit a photon. " A further
writes: "But what if the electron is free and does not move, so that its kinetic and
potential energy is zero? In this case, the electron is forced to "borrow" the
photon of rest its own energy. (Simply "rip a piece of his body"). Such a
process is photon emission from the classical point of view strictly prohibited.
Quantum mechanics (and her father) is less categorical, allows such processes
but on one condition-it must be finished within the uncertainty between energy
and time. How fast electron emits and absorbs a photon, in turn, depends only
on the photon energy. The higher the energy, the more quickly the electron to
complete such an event. But if emited and absorbed electron a photon, which
itself was born before that, should this process in terms of interaction no
meaning. Photon is different from the same photon energy indistinguishable,
doesn¨t any "moles", so that the electron can not distinguish their own returned
absorbed photon of a photon from a stranger. But all foreign photon absorption
has a very clear meaning: there is interaction between the electrons; the
electrons repel each other "And here is buried the pooch!
Someone perceives this apparent contradiction?! Electron apparently is not
able distinguish by absorb own 'photon from, a foreign', but reliably
responds by moving only in absorbing foreign photon; the absorption, its'
photon is not working. Is someone able to explain to us why the responsible
electron responds only to foreign photon absorption, though for him are
one‘s own and foreign photons indistinguishable?! According to what thus
recognize foreign from their own?
I'd like to suggest a very reliable method of resolution of foreign and own photons:Since the
foreign travel is very far probably he have lice; on the road toohygiene holdings. So, the
electron which comes photons simply get viewing his head. It's brilliant! I do not know that
the fysisists it are so naïve.
This monstrous antilogikum is the biggest Achilles heel to QED! Lee Smolin it
probably already aware, but other physicists that have "generously" ignore, do
not because of some "stupid" logic break down their "grand" idea work. In
addition, so-called virtual photons have another one, particularity ': postissuance apparently do not fly straight away from the electron, how the photons
is well behaved, but apparently, according to Professor Ivan Úlehla, with the
parabolic arch (bend) return back to the emitter. What physical force rotates the
direction of movement of these photons back to the emitter, the professor did not
communicate. Is it so obvious? (Mirrors there probably do not). Administrative
fysicists about this "stupid" do not ask. (Maul halten und weiter dienen!).
Professor Ivan Úlehla in his book drew a really nice elastic crow's feet showing
retrograde movement of virtual photons, something like the petals of flowers. Is
this even still a photon? Photon, which is free from external physical causes
rotates back to the emitter? Photon, which, though in principle indistinguishable
from all the others, but its mechanical absorber responds only to those non one‘s
ewn"! But qanťáci are at rest.
Úlehla‘s photon flowers
Professor Úlehla with virtual photons demonstrates the attractive force between
the proton and electron. How is a repulsive force between two electrons with the
same photons are, unfortunately, revealed!There is another antifyzikum: how
and Professor Ivan Úlehla writes that electrons can (and should?) Emit photons
for all possible types of interactions, ie photons every conceivable (and infinitely
large?) Weight. That in itself is a monstrous nonsense: rational physics here
passes into mysticism where everything is permitted and really reaches the level
of religious ideas about the omnipotence of God. It is still necessary to persuade
somebody, that idea of selfreturned the "unused" virtual photons as real agents
of interaction between material objects is misleading and illogical. She is not
sufficiently "crazy" is just a lot of stupid and irrational. Yet it is clear that the
material objects with each other through "something" "communicate." But
how?! Kvarton's physics says touch with their "endless" elevator weight field!
So how come he knew 200 years ago practitioner Michael Faraday. Only one
thing is not clear to me: what forces to attracting virtuals with no electric charge!
You probably annihilate accidental collisions.
Footnote
QED assumes more interesting, Heisenberg and therefore allowable real phenomenon: in the
physical vacuum is said constantly (I do not know how often and with what energy) is "born"
and then disappear not only virtual photons, but also a pair of virtual particles and
antiparticles of all kinds. Thus, even particles with electric charge. "Pop" from the vacuum
enjoy a skimpy liberty that Mr. Heisenberg allowed in wake of disappearing back together in
a vacuum; Lord love gave, Lord love takes it. But then it is undisputed that in this situation in
the vacuum at any given moment there are a number of free virtual particles with both
polarities of charge, which, however, physical forms of non-zero density of vacuum
electrolyte. What happens to a charged conductive spheres, or with a charged capacitor in this
electrolyte vacuum? What is commonly known: soon lose its power; charge, is discharged.
Has anyone ever watched such rapid self-discharge of capacitors to be in a vacuum? Prof.
Ivan Úlehla describes the possibility of direct interaction with normal virtual electron. QED
based on theThesis that charged particles also emit photons of all "weight categories" and
writes: "Among the transmitted photons, electrons can be the energy of photons with million
electronvolts (where's the halfmega poor electron mass takes, God only knows) And with
these photons is linked to an interesting virtual process: For short time of his life can be
energetic virtual photon is converted into an electron-positron pair. And in a short time are
suddenly close to each other instead of one electron, but two electrons and one positron. It
takes only a moment, and then again there is only one electron. (The one who disconnected
with the positron) Which of the electrons, however, anihilated and who stays alone? It can not
be said-after all, electrons can not be distinguished from each other! „The birth of the virtual
electron-positron pair for a brief moment in the exchange of high-energy photons can be
imagined as a result of the interaction of the electron with the vacuum." So many from prof.
Úlehla. Demonstrates that the vacuum, called virtual positron can annihilate not only back
with a virtual colleague but also with normal electron, for example, an electron on the surface
of charged capacitor plates. How long will these circumstances charge stay on capacitor
plates in a vacuum environment virtual?! And it demonstrates the unsustainability of QED
ideas about the real existence of the virtual. QED. Yet another "tool" to interact she have not
and why she keeps "teeth-nail" .To this "impasse" Einstein's physics introduced rigorous
requirement of the absence of a stable form of the material structure of the physical vacuum.
QED is a desperate attempt physicists somehow "clog" this gap in theory at least the idea of a
virtual vacuum, which, however, for its stochasticity can not be "fixed" reference system. The
vacuum thus was "something" is filled, but Einstein dictation excluding any universal
reference system that withstood (wolf again ripe him, but a goat remained).
Feeblemindedness QED depth exposes this Rydnik‘s sentence: In this case, the electron is
forced to "borrow" from the photon its rest energy. To what ridiculous perzonifikacím must
reach in order to explain the unexplainable: Electron is cast in the role of an entrepreneur who
is forced (by whom and by what means?) take a "loan" to your business 'project' - to infinite
virtual photon emission. Ancient gods creatures people also to take on, because human
imagination, form human or animal, but what is too much, it is too! We have a millennium on.
Arsenal gods "for everything" has long since emptied. In nature, organisms also born, but not
out of nothing! It is always at the beginning of "seed", which evolves over time in the adult.
Nothing like the virtual. They are "born" as done in the blink of adults-and especially out of
nowhere! Neither this paradox the physics excite! Except Lee Smolin.
Part II.
Motto of kvarton's physics:The mass appears everywhere where is disturbed the
symmetry of dislocation the primary matter in space, ie where to full symmetry
of space any components are missing or dwells.
Elementary particles.
As I indicated above, whenever is there in the kvarton‘s "ocean"
with perfectly null and void kvartons, one total free protoel -vakant,
than he will creates with its uncompensated masseffect on the
surroundings disturbed spherical system, ie excited, kvartons; the
massfield of this vakant. As is evident from the description, the
vakant and its massfields are organically disconnected, symbiotic.
(Closest to this idea were physicists Luis de Broglie and David Bohm.
Yet both, unfortunately, did not recognize the connection between the
nature of submicroscopic agens of elementary particles - vakant- and
the macrovolumed massfield, the originator of its wave properties. So
called, wave ball '(wave- pilot), mathematically attached to
microparticles, postulated by de Broglie, hadn‘t a chance to
permanently hold together a fragile system. Prof. Rydnik writes: "The
electron could be regarded as a point particle, if it were not
inextricably linked with wave. The blurred due to the apparent
position of the electron which can be located at any point of its waves.
"But what is the physical nature of the strange blur waves have no
idea. Among his equations and transformations the answer comes not.
Also Czech prof. Ivan Úlehla considers that "the motion of the
electron have wave character, which is inextricably linked with a
continuous, space-reactive material (interesting idea). "Electron as a
wave" circumnavigating "things“ and „touches" the objects relatively
near and relatively distant due to its size .. Just can cause bending and
interference phenomena in its motion. Direct measurability wave
function is probably totally excluded." Bravo, wow professors! You
have created a more undetectable virtuality. It's only possible to say
that both physicists successfully "swim around" the reality of the
physical vacuum and hanging in vicious circles defined constraints
STR, GTR and QED, fail to find a way out. They canť.
In the model of Socrates ortophysics is organic connection
microparticles and its makrofield mass excited kvartons natural,
because both components of this symbiotics are from the same "test":
it consists of primary protoelements (protoels) this (our) "floor" of the
universe. In general, therefore each elementary particle (photon isn‘t
in this sense elemementary particle, because he have not vakant) form
an organic symbiosis submicroscopics vakant as a source of
uncompensated physical activity and it generated makroovolume
massfield of excited kvartons. (Marquis de Broglie would certainly
cheered and shouteds eureka). If it such an elementary particle itself
throughout the local universe, has its macrocosmic mass perfect
spherical array structure disturbed kvartonů and intensity of this
distortion kvarton is given by m = M/r2 . Vakant is located inside the
first spherical shell excitation with the largest degree of excitation
kvartons. Constant, probably cyclic interactions with this first shell of
kvartons vakant peel constantly and repeatedly generates its mass
field. If vakant have unit electric charge, (because it contains
uncompensated protoel (p) or (p'), then the addition to the mass also
causes radial excitation polarization (filming) kvartons throughout the
mass array. The intensity of polarization P of the electric field has the
same structure as the material excitation, ie p = Q/r2.
When the poor vakant is dragged of his own field
Movement of elementary particles to the structure of the global
kvartonové "lattices". (Fundamentals of movement).
The above-described construction of elementary particle with
spherically ideally structured elevator mass or electrostatic field is
against the world kvarton‘s three-dimensional "lattice"
motionless, static. If it were possible to somehow mark the first
kvartons excitatory shell of the particle, we would find that vakant
permanently remains inside this marked "shell" gradual and
continuous interaction with all kvartons in first shell generates its
spherical mass array. What should be done for the spatial
displacement vakant with the whole mass of the field particles aut of
"shell"? It is necessary to disrupt the action outer material the ideal
spherical shape first excitatory shell and actually the whole spherical
massfield particles. How to do I‘ll arrange it. The easiest way is to
place in the vicinity of such, indifferent 'vakant with ideally spherical
massfielf another vakant with his massfield. Tangible effects of both
vakants on the joint kvarton‘s interspace, created composite, total
(additive) massfield, that is no longer in the vicinity of both vakants
the origin spherical massfield. Will have a certain degree of
asymmetry excitations. (Incidentally, this is the principle and
substance of the gravitational field. Gravitational field is the
cumulative massfield from all vakants located in the common area).
But let us return to the principle of movement vakant (elementary
particle). As I wrote, this should disrupt the spherical shape of the
excitation massfield of vakant up to the very first excitatory shell. If
before vakant, e.g. protoel (n) within the first shell interacted with the
same intensity with all this kvartons in 1. shell, now are the kvartons
located in the direction of another loaded vakant, a little more excited
than kvartons on opposite sides of both vakants. Also kvartons first
shell are no longer excited symmetrically, in the direction due to the
asymmetry of the mass field is excitation the largest. This will be
fatally reflected in the interaction of vakant with kvartons first shell.
With most excited kvarton at the junction occurs closer to the clasp till
the resonance vakant with most excitated kvarton, so together
momentarily creates unstable resonance - kvinton (npp'nn'), which is
for internal instability then decays back to singlon (n) and kvarton (p p
'n n'). Kvinton unstable, however, may crumble back to singlon and
kvarton i this way: initial vakant- protoel {n} will continue in
conjunction with protoely inside kvintonu (npp'n'n) and create with
them a new complete kvarton (pp'nn') when simultaneously is from
the opposite side of kvinton separated somewhat suddenly "excess"
protoel (n), which has originally part of the excitated kvinton. So will
be create a new 'vakant shifted in the space of one dimension of
kvarton. Elevator mass effect, of shifted 'vakant immediately create a
new, to the original, shifted massfield. V.I. Rydnik describes this
process so that the electron countless dives into the vacuum and
emerges somewhere nearby in the neighborhood. Physicists says this
extraordinary phenomenon called - trembling electron.
Yes, and so it can be clearly interpreted: vakant of particle will for a
moment from the inside first shell connected by excited kvarton, ie it
disappears with him in vacuum and then on the other hand, of kvinton
it now appears new vakant. One concrete vakant, protoel (n), for a
moment, "disappeared" in conjunction with the most excited kvarton
and other protoel (n) of the same quality then "emerged" (split with)
on the opposite side of the "pregnant" kvinton as a new protoelvakant. This process of "extinction" protoels on one side kvartons and
"emerging" on opposite sides kvartons accompanies all movement of
vakants and its massfield throught the kvarton’s space world's threedimensional "lattice". Vakant seems to "jump" over kvartons Vakant
es moving elementary particle will be gradually becoming protoely (n)
on the splinter kvartons from the route of movement; Rydnik writes:
on one hand, the particle sinks' into the vacuum chamber and on the
opposite side of the vacuum (kvarton ), the particle emerges'. The
steeper the gradient of the mass asymmetry of the excitation field of
vakant, the more often interchangeable implements this process and
vakant, singlon (n) with this "transition" over the kvartons inches by
kvarton’s latice in the direction of the largest mass asymmetry his
field. With constantly renewing and shear first excitatory shell. Here it
should be emphasized that the initiative for this specific shift of
particle always based on its state of the asymmetry of the massfield of
particl and particle‘s agents-vakant themselves, is actually "dragged"
its elevator asymmetric massfield in the direction of the asymmetry. It
is used here in full idea of de Broglie wave-pilot. The direction and
speed of vakant is given of gradient direction and of the greatness
asymmetry of massfield of vakant.
The figure shows the general principle of moving single-vakantu to
the kvarton's "bars". His "Passage" by excited kvarton in the first
shell his massfield.
Beige color indicates the volume and reach of the binding field inside kvarton (kvinton).
(see the animation of miror changes p→n, n→p with leptons in enclosure)
In the asymmetric massfield of elementary particles occurs in the first
stage for greater interaction the vakant with the most excited kvarton
in the first peel of the massfield. In 2. phase occurs between them
overcoupling, leading to complete both conjugation. 3. phase is
beginning of separation. A strongly unstable resonant kvinton in the
4th phase immediately decays back to singlon kvarton and to their
complete separation. Accompanied by a significant decrease in
excitation kvarton (shown its reduced volume). New singlon, protoel
(p) has exactly the same physical qualities as the one that came into
conjugation with excit. kvarton on the his "left" (according to the
drawn schema). Protoel (p) separate from kvinton on the his opposite
the right side. The result of the phased process is that the original
vakant on one left side fused with most excited kvarton of which is
immediately opposite the new vakant separated. This "process"
microtransition vakant trough kvartons continues until his massfield
remove his asymmetry. The result is a spatial shift vakant with his
elementary particles throughout to kvarton's structure of the vacuum.
Massfield of two elementary particles in a sufficient distance
Blue continuous lines represent the size of the massfield excitation of
particles depending on the distance from vakantu l = Q / r
Red dashed lines are izoexcity, ie the connector locations with the
same mass field excitation vakants
Approximation of two elementary particles from the upper position
to the lower level, La → Lb
Green indicates an increase of the mass asymmetry common
field
Double picture shows the shape of the massfields of both elementary
particles approaching them together.
At the indicated convergence of both particles at the bottom of the
picture will change significantly as the blue line Q/r2, and izoexcit
lines, resulting, total particle massfield of both fields is longer, as is
shown in the lower figure, strongly asymmetric. This asymmetry
(marked green A) "forced" vakants both particles further
approximation them and thus further growth asymmetry and
accelerated movement together. (As ingravitation field).
Of course, so it thrives to second vakant in asymmetric common
massfield in which I was kind of forgotten about. He is experiencing
the same interchangeable process "jumps" over the first kvartons of
shell its massfield gradient generated asymmetry proportional
cumulative massfield and moves in the same way in the direction of
the asymmetry of common massfield, ie, to the first vakant. With the
shift of both vakants and his massfields together with increasing
intensity and gradient of excitation kvartons resultant composite
massfield between them and it is accompanied by a proportionate
acceleration motion both vakants together; exactly as old Mr.
Newton's equations. This is the principle of every "attractive"
gravitational interaction between material objects!
Induced asymmetry compound, an additive (gravitational) massfield is
proportional to the mass (number of vakants) in the participating
bodies. Mutual gravitational displacement of entire body weight is
converted proporcionate to bodies.To these can be explained by the
fact that essentially negligible amount vakants constituting ordinary
earthly body size causes negligible asymmetry summation
(gravitational) field of planet Earth. And thus its negligible shift to the
ordinary body. Associated vakants in the ordinary body gains a great
asymetry causes of all vakants in planet. This then correspond to the
approach velocity of a ordinary body and the planet. If it goes such a
ordinary body freely in gravitacion of planet, does not change its total
weight, only changes direction and gradient asymmetry his massfield.
After each vakant’s jump over kvarton moves his massfield and a
new array resulting asymmetry common to all vakants. Further
movement of vakants governed by this newly created joint
asymmetry, sum gravitational field. The movement of each body in
the summary gravitational field is composed of all microjumps all
vakants of this body. As I wrote: the free body mass in gravitacional
field, slope ("tilt"), asymmetry of the additive mass field, determine
the speed (via microjump kvartons) asymmetry in the direction of a
common mass (gravitational) field.
Gravity is the most basic interaction of all material structures in the
universe. Even Isaac Newton "discovered" the mathematical
relationship interaction materials, but did not reveal the physical
nature of this action. With knowledge in those days he can not
recognize the changed structure of space between bodies - the
structure of the gravitational field.
The root of all evil in Einsteinian physics is the apotheosis of the
relative motion. According to Einstein's dogmathe primary cause of
the physical behavior of physical objects is their relative motion.
Einstein derived from him outside the framework the being of
physical objects (dimensions, intrinsic reactivity, interactivity, etc.).
By A. Einstein causality in physics turned upside down: the primary
cause of all, the physical state of massfield an object he confused with
the secondary consequence, ie the velocity of the material object as
the primary cause of its physical behavior. Totally misleading is the
idea of equivalence the movement, of the real motion induced of
asymmetry body‘s massfield and relative pseudomotion all the
external environment, including all bodies towards the body. This
pseudomotion is not due to any change in sphericity of massfield
surrounding bodies yet he is accorded all the physical attributes of real
moving bodies. This obviously misguided dogma introduced physics
into a morass of paradoxs and renormalization practices. In Socrates
physics is always the primary cause of all the physical state of
massfield of object and everything else, ie time reactivity and
subject movement is a result of this condition.
.
Principle dislocation kinetic mass in the volume elementary
particles
You can read hundreds of scientific books about physics, but
nowhere, no will tell you, where elementary particles are storing their
so-called kinetic energy with which is associated with the appropriate
mass. Mass as one of the most fundamental and immutable physical
properties. The total amount in the closed system of material objects
are consistently maintained. Is passed between objects of a closed
system like a hot potato, or Black Peter, but how and where is mass
located in the volume particles even under the threat of capital
punishment ,educated' do not know. Why!
It is obvious that when if is accelerated a rocket from the fuel passed
by some process (kinetic energy) mass, which is again released from
the rocket body in the event of a sudden stop. One thing is certain:
elementary particles, which consists of a rocket, "won" when
accelerating from elementary particles of matter uprest drives (socalled kinetic) energy / mass. In this process the "transfer" released
every particle fuel by increasing their chemical bonds corresponding
differential quantum mass and "gave" him the elementary particles of
solid rockets. In sum: each particle rockets acquired during the
process of accelerating quantum of mass and must therefore be the
question: where in its volume this mass that moves with the particle is
harbored. For some it's a trivial question: no, just that mass somehow
in itself has, and when necessary, so it somehow "cleared". Current
academic physics, unfortunately, do not knows better and more
concrete answer.. In sum: each particle rockets acquired during the
process of accelerating quantum uprest weight and must therefore be
the question of where in its volume of this mass that moves with the
particle, harbor. For some it's a trivial question: no just the cinemas.
mass somehow in itself has, and when necessary, so it somehow
"cleared". Current academic physics, unfortunately, knows better,
more concrete answer.
Then there is this problem: the elementary particles gain so-called
kinetic energy, but why all this acquired energy/mass causes moving
the particles in space? Each elementary particle has a so-called rest
mass, which, however, does not surround her movement. Why is it
creates so called kinetic mass? Is it a different quality or the kinetic
mass at all other mass? It is not! Since this "kinetic" mass may
suddenly be "transformed" in the normal rest mass, eg when is braking
creations particle-antiparticle pairs. And conversely, when any of the
physical bound are "released" kinetic mass at the expense of the rest
mass of particles bound. All this suggests that there isn‘t a dual mass.
So why is divided a single mass at rest and et kinetic and why only
the 'kinetic' mass causes movement of particles? What official says
physicist? Well, because she is the kinetic. Really compelling
argument!
Kvarton‘s ortophysicis is more informative, although perhaps a
little short: all elementary particles mass is in their massfields. Yes
that's, so simple! Basic quantum rest mass of the particle is elementary
quantum (sizes) of uncompensated material effect on the vakant on
surrounding kvartons. The rest massfield of particles is spherically
symmetric and therefore she is without moving in space of kvarton‘s
"lattice". It's been said that the quantum primary mass M of vakant on
the gradual excitation all kvartons extends spherically on the whole
massfield. The mass of each kvarton in massfield is expressed in terms
of its material excitations. The sum of the rate of mass excitations of
kvartons massfield is equal to the primary tangible effects quantum M
of vakant. To such a complex vakant and his massfield gave to the
motion in "lattice" we must disrupt the perfect spherically excitation
of massfield particles, ie create asymmetric, non-spherical mass field.
This can be done in two ways: in gravitational field by composite the
particles massfields with the gravitational field. The result of
composing is the common asymmetric massfield array. In the
direction of this common asymmetry is that all actors creating
composite gravitationalfield begin to move together. Because all these
actors to each other, "cause" mass asymmetry of their fields, they do
not need the asymmetry "import" from outdoor.This gravitational
asymmetryfield goes only at bill on the internal particle rest mass.
Therefore, the total mass of free elementary particles in gravitational
field no changes!
Outside of gravitational field or in a wery weak gravitational field
must be create the necessary asymmetry by adding mass, ie by
increasing the excitation field of kvartons by mass of outside particles.
Such "attracting" (increase) excitation of kvartons massfield always
the bring direction, and it is asymmetric in principle. It is possible to
say that the kinetic energy / mass "resides" in the massfield of particle,
in the form of increased excitation kvartons, on that side of the mass
field where the particles ar moving ("sitting at the wheel with the foot
on the gas"). mass asymmetry degree field and thus the velocity of the
particle sizes is invoked added, nadklidové weight (excitation). A
degree of massfield asymmetry and induced velocity of elementary
particle corresponds to additing uprestmass to him., I just called
kinetic, uprest mass of the particle always "sits at the wheel ".
Part III.
Types of elementary particles, their "break-up" and transformation.
Protoels with a thin black limits are in the basic mass state, protoels with a bold
edge are in a higher mass condition. Vakants of them are agents of muons,
pions, kaons and all higher types of mesons and hyperons. Pion pi ° is actually a
very excited kvarton with two protoels with higher mass level. Therefore, his
"breakdown" is about 100 million times faster than pions with electric charge.
Generally is the vakant each structural anomaly in a homogeneous
structure of kvarton‘s "ocean", which shows a certain degree of
cartridge and uncompensated physical activity (excitation) of the
surrounding null and void, i.e. fully compensated kvartons.
Simplest types of such structural anomalies are vakants with only ones
protoels. For it is the loneliness I called them singlons (p), (p'), (n),
(n'). (Symbols with a comma are antipodes). These singlons
"wrapped" with an excitated massfield consists of 4 elementary
particles: proton, antiproton, neutron and antineutron. Protoels of
group N (n), (n'), generating particle neutron and antineutron and have
a "slap" more tangible effects quantum, than protoels of group P (p),
(p'), which generate protons and antiprotons. Strictly by 1.3 MeV/c2.
Why this is so, I do not know. (But this is certainly one of the reasons
why neutrons spontaneously "disintegrate" while protons not).
Another very stable type of vakants are duons. It consists of two
protoels of mass antipodity, and the charge antipodity, so these
variants are possible: (pp'), (nn'), (np‘) and (pn') The first two pairs are
vakants of elementary particles neutrinos by type P and N. Because
they are composed of the ideal itself antipodes their outer rest mass is
zero, but both pairs of vakants, (pp') and (nn'), have towards each
other residual P-N antipodity, which troubles many theorists, whether
it is mass or not. Mass in literally washed it is not: it is a grupe
antipodity. (Just as there is no tangible charge antipodity) Another two
duons - vakants, (np) and (pn') form, together with their massfield
antipodity known as the lower mass leptons in the ground state, the
electron and positron. In addition to the two differential mass
antipodes (mass particle of group N is greater than the mass of the
particle group P) is also here applied grupe antipodity P-N. Therefore,
the stability of these elementary particles is very high, proporcionaly
to mass deficit internal links between both protoels in vakant. It is the
second largest binding strukture in the universe after binding protoels
in kvarton.
Singlons and duons as vakants of nucleons and leptons were for many
years only known the basic building blocks of our "floor" of the
world. With the development of experimental high-energy physics,
were gradually discovered other, more complex forms of vakants. But
their "life", was very low and thus their high instability. And so the
experimenters were gradually identified unstable "elementary
particles“ which I classify according to the arrangement of their
vakants as trion, tetron, kvinton, sexton, perhaps septon. Trions, and
kvintons and the others exist only as ultrashorttime, transient
(resonant) states of noncompensate protoels formations. Are
somewhat more durable tetron when a substitution protoels of two
equal groups podity (p→n, n→p). This substitution creates a short
formation of vakants: (np'nn'), (pp'pn'). Theirs particle are known as
pions. (Types tetron (pn'nn') or (pp'np') formed by replacing
antipodean protoels (n‘→p‘, p‘→n‘)"apply" in antiworld.)
Trions are vakants arise only as unstable, resonant, intermediate states
with ultrashorttime life (generally <10-24 sec) in contact duons singlons interactions, which can lead to replacement protons to
neutrons and reverse, of course, with the current substitution of
leptons.
The Promiscuity reigns the world
Transmutation vakants of nucleons p, n, in contact with vakants of
positron and vakants of neutrinaN (antineutrino) schematically as
follows:
(p) + (nn') → (pnn') → (pn') + (n)
classically: proton + antineutrino → positron + neutron
(classical physics does not know the transformation intermediate
state)
(n) + (pn') → (npn') → (nn') + (p)
classically: neutron + positron →antineutrino + proton
It's obvious that both of these transmutation can be schematically
written to a "mirror" series, which can be read from left to right along
the lines of the upper arrow, or from right to left by the lower arrows.
The following procedure: in tight contact proton‘s vakant (p with
vakant of neutrinoN¨, (nn‘) arises on ultrashorttime strongly unstable
trione (pnn‘), whose anomalous decay occurs vakant of neutron (n)
and vakant of positron (pn‘). And we may so read from right to left: in
contact vakant of neutron (n) with vakant of positron (pn‘) unstable
resonance occurs trion (pnn‘),that immediate disintegrated to proton
(p) a neutrinoN (nn‘).
It should be emphasized that these close contacts of vakants not
necessarily be confused protoels and thus the emergence of "new"
particles. I think more often the trione resonance decay back to the
original vakants. So, for example: (p) + (nn') → (pnn') → (p) + (nn'
Mirror changes of nucleons with participation of leptons I.
Interrupt binding circle around the resonance reflects the high volatility of the
binding. (see the animation of miror changes p→n, n→p with leptons in
attachement)
Another pair of mirrored transmutation vakants of nucleons p (p),
n(n), this time over vakants of neutrinoP (pp‘) and electron (np‘).
Transmutation consists of two series:
(n) + (pp') → (npp') → (np‘) + (p)
classically: neutron → proton + neutrino + electron
(again, it should be noted that classical physics does not know ..
intermediate state resonance (npp‘))
(p) + (np‘) → (pnp') → (pp') + (n)
classically: proton+ electron → neutron + neutrinoP
These two transmutation can be repeat schematically written in the
same series as the mirror transmutation.
Mirror changes of nucleons with participation of leptons II.
(see the animation of miror changes n→p, p→n with leptons in enclosure)
Similarly, there seem to be at antiworld equally unstable resonance
antitrions confusion that accompanies antivakants with protoels (p')
and (n '), according to schedule:
(p') + (nn') → (p'nn') → (n') + (p'n)
classically: antiproton + antineutrino → electron + antineutron
(n') + (pp') → (n'pp') → (p') + (n'p)
classically: antineutron + neutrino → antiproton + positron
(p') + (n‘p) → (n'p'p) → (n ') + (pp')
classically: antiproton + positron → antineutron + neutrino
(n') + (np‘) → (n'np') → (p') + (nn')
classically: antineutron + electron → antineutrino + antiproton
All of the above contacted interactions singlons with duons
(classically: nucleons and leptons), have been observed in many
experiments in direct frontal collisions of nucleons and leptons. Matter
of principle, the trion resonance can‘t decay other than duon and
singlon, so called baryon’, lepton’ and charge‘ numbers as their rules
of preservation devised physicists are redundant!
Here it is necessary to draw attention to a phenomenon that is in
kvarton‘s physics general: In all interactions involved vakants there
is no birth or death of protoels. The so-called "birth" and
"extinction" of elementary particles, which is literally weedy academic
physics, have no place in kvarton‘s model! All four protoels entering
in interactions or vakants based of them are changeless and
stable. The only change is in the configuration protoels in vakants of
interactions outgoing. It's just such a submicroscopic: caskets chairs!
Of course, with varying degrees of ties of vakants. Invariant and thus
"eternal" are only, and only theirs primary protoels "tied" in vakants!
As is also clear from both schemes there is never any confusion as
interactions with nucleons e.g. (p) + (pp') or (n) + (nn'), ie,
classically: proton with neutrino and neutron with antineutrinos.
Similarly, (p) + (pn'), or (n) + (np‘), which are classical: proton with
positron and neutron with an electron. Notwithstanding the principle
conservation of charge and podityes in these contact interactions, if
they occur randomly, never lead to confusion involved vakants;
always the actors' decay back to its original vakant-particle.
In any case there is no confusion of nucleons in contact
interactions of the type: n +antiný, n + e-, or p +ný, p +e+ . In
kvarton‘ form: (n) +nn '), (n +(np'), or (p) +(pp'), (p + (pn').
In all these cases it is of the kvarton' registration obvious why.
.
caskets, caskets chairs
The decays of elementary particles.
The most famous "disintegration" and literally pearl of physics
elementary particles is classical "decay" of neutron: neutron → proton
+ electron + antineutrino. In the kvarton’s model, however not decay
himself single vakant of neutron, thus protoel (n), it is nonsense of
classical physics! I wrote that themselves protoels, are unbreakable
and invariant. But in anormal (see above normal transition) transition
of vakant of neutron over the excited kvarton in first shell of
excitation, when in the moment arises resonance, ie unstable kvinton
(npp'nn'), then from internal causes (non-standard position of protoels
inside the kvinton?) do not come normal detachment protoelu (n),
but quite anomalously on the opposite side of kvinton is detached
protoel (p), ie vakant of proton. (Energy this substitution is possible).
This anomalous decay of resonant kvinton (npp'nn') in (p) + (np'nn')
instead of the complete kvarton and singlon is "lifeless". Tetron
(np'nn') have insufficient mass so that very quickly (<10-24 sec)
splits into two already stable duons, since they have lower mass, (np)
+ (nn') which are, as we know vakants of electron and antineutrinos.
Such „self decay" of neutron is possible only for its greater mass than
proton. Kvarton' "decay" of classical neutron give the following two
lines:
(n) + (pp'nn') → (p) + (np'nn') → (p) + (np) + (nn')
classical notation: neutron → proton + electron + antineutrino
Phased diagram anomalous crossing the vacant neutron through
the kvarton (or the classic "decay" of neutron)
schema decay of neutron
conjuction vacant
(n) with kvarton
resonance
of kvinton
anomalous
decay of kvinton
configuration
separation the
of kvinton
vacant of proton
products of decay:
vacants of proton,
elektron + neutrino N
(see the animation of decay the neutron in attachment)
The essence of the cause and mechanism of this "decay" of neutron
was long a mystery of classical physics. They were invented various
theories and reasoning patterns of conservation, such as conservation
of nucleons, charge conservation, conservation of parity, lepton
number conservation, momentum, and many others. Only the
mechanism of "decay" somehow defies detection. It was clear to all
that the neutron in themselves not "wearing" proton, an electron and
an antineutrino or their fetuses. From "disintegration" arise from all
beginning full elementary particles. Finally, the physicists decided that
it "fits" into smaller components inside a neutron, to the quark Place
of the whole neutron it decays apparently just part of it. But the
dilemma remained: why and how the quark decays? They threw it to
the existence of invisible virtual meson Z. Why from litlemassing
quark "jumps" heavy-load mass (90 times heavier than himself
neutron) meson? The answer still missing!
Sokrates’s answer is: neutron‘s decay is an accident on his motion.
What is certain is this: at some point of space with no obvious cause,
neutron disappears and at the same point emerge particles: proton, an
electron and a neutrino. In doing so, from this execution of 'neutrons
hog' they break off for himself his mass. KMV says this: neutron
haven’t an electrically polarized massfield. Kvartons through which
the neutron‘s vakant passes haven't consistently oriented electrically
only by its group's afinity (acting at a very short distance), and thus
the resonant decay of kvinton not necessarily always lead to
separation protoel (n), as well as transitions protoels with electric
charge (eg proton, electron, muon, etc.). When such an anomalous
separation occurs, instead of the normal kvarton all of a sudden arise
an lifeless and lightmass vakant-tetron with three protoels group N,
but only one of the group P, which is due to this configuration highly
unstable and therefore immediately splits into two lightmass duons.
Similarly, as a neutron , according to the standard model, should be
"crumble" in this way a proton, but would have to be obtained from
outside environment sufficient differential above rest mass (n - p).
This deficit in mass, but also electrically polarized massfield of proton
keeps him from spontaneous decay as it is possible for the neutron.
Although proton‘s decay classical physicists of the Standard Model
have long promised, and planted on its decay different ,trap', the above
descript conditions prevents it.
If the gain the protoel of proton (p) and its massfield by outside
intervention enough mass so that arises when the short fusion with
kvarton harder excited kvinton- resonance (ppp'nn') may be, like the
neutron, the anomalous decay to (n) + (pp'pn'), and this 'undermass'
lifeless tetron then also disintegrates into two stable duons (pn') +
(pp').
(p) + (pp'nn ') → (n) + (pp'pn') → (n) + (pn ') + (pp')
Standard record: proton → neutron + positron + neutrinoP
However, this anomalous "decay" proton occurs only under specific
conditions: when vakant of proton interacts with kvarton especially in
highly excited massfield, for example near the heavy nuclei. Where is
strongly disrupted the longitudinal electric polarization of kvartons
massfield, (kvartons are polarized along the direction of proton'
motion), which normally guarantees its normal transition.
But not for free proton with albeit great kinetic mass it is not moving
in very close proximity to heavy atomic nuclei spontaneously don’t
decay. Its free decay prevents longitudinal polarization of mentioned
his massfield. Classical physicists for decades, sitting at their tanks
with chloride and despair scan the horizon something that could be
called a spontaneous proton decay. Futile!
Lee Smolin to them wrote:
No proton decay was observed. We've waited long enough, we can honestly say
that the grand unification SU (5) is incorrect. It was a beautiful idea, but her
nature seemed not to adopt
SU(5) provides two variants of proton decay: proton → positron +
pion and proton → antineutrino + pion.
Both variants are by KMV impossible of the simple reason: of
resonant kvinton (which contains 5 protoels), nor a miracle, can not
arise duon and tetron! Since 2 + 4 = 6, gentlemen! And nature it really
knows not?
The same is with respect for kvarton‘s model, which excluded
interchangeable interaction of neutron with antineutrino and the
proton with neutrino. If these particles meet together confusion no
occurs , always departing the same actors. In contrast, the direct
interaction antineutrino with the proton and neutron with neutrino can
leads with certain probability to confusion as I described above.
Decays of muons, pions and mesons generally
It should first be noted that all four protoels may on very shortly of
time exist in variety of higher mass . It is obviously possible the
protoels with own internal structure, on which I still only speculate.
The existence of two higher levels of protoels mass strongly suggests
the existence of families of elementary particles. However, it is not in
leptons whose three modifications have essentially the same physical
characteristics and differs only different of mass Because all types of
leptons are duons, or 2 protoels in vakant, it is possible to speculate
that the electron, positron and two neutrinos have in their vakants two
protoels with its base mass. For the muons of both polarities and both
of mí-neutrinos is obvious that in their vakant is one protoel with the
basic mass and the one with a higher mass. In contrast, tau lepton and
tau neutrinos have in the vakant both protoels with higher mass level.
In my record of these modifications I differentiate them with fat
symbols of protoels in vakant.
So are 3 families of leptons. Writing as follows: electron (np‘), muon
(np‘) and the tau lepton (np‘). A similar distinction I used for
positron, muon+ taoun+ and so for both electron', muon' and tauon‘
neutrinos. By anomalous muon'-transition whose vakant is duon in a
higher state (np') through kvarton arises shortly very unstable
resonance sexton (np'pp'nn‘) . Anomality of this transition is that the
decay sexton don‘t replicate muon (np), but protoel (n) in the time of
separation has combined with antiprotoel (n') to form together vakant
of muon‘ antineutrinosN (nn'). Residual Tetron (p'p n p'), which is
sharply unstable (10-24 sec) (3p + 1 n), is then split into two longer
stable duons (p'n) and (pp'), ie classic: an electron and a neutrino. If
gets however, the residual tetron by fission of sexton sufficient mass
(introduced by fast muon) increases its life on the order of 10-8 sec and
arise meson pi and they then of course also splits into two the same
stable duons. What has been written about the negative muon-, is
similarly true of the positive muon+ with decay to positron and
antineutrinoN.
Kvarton‘s write of "decay" muon- during his anomalous crossing the
excitates kvarton:
(np‘) + (pp'nn') → (np'pp'nn') → (nn') + (pp'np') → (nn') + (pp') +
(np)
Progressive scheme muon decay crossing with abnormal excited
kvarton
(see the animation of muons decay in enclosure)
Thus, in the 1st phase, by tight conjunction, protoel (n) of muon will
bind with closest kvarton‘s protoel (n') and thus to bind highly stable
vakant of muon' neutrinos (nn'). After their subsequent separation
from the rest protoels of sexton then tetron are disjointed and
"lifeless" tetron (pp'np'), which in the second phase immediately splits
into two stable duons: electron and neutrinoP. Of course, that is
similar on "decay" the muon+: After his anomalous conjuction with
excited kvarton arises vakant mion‘s neutrinaP and then the
remaining protoels (pn'nn') goes to pairing of two highly stable duons
and arise vakants positron and neutrinoN. (How simple my dear
Watson!) For example, in the anomalous decay of mesons K and Eta
also arises tetron (pp'np'), but this meson have unlike mion much
greater mass in its massfield and thus their decays particle obtain
during "parceling" a resonant' okton have sufficient mass than the
tetron (pp'np') that extended significantly his life. than they falls to
the same two duons as the decay of muon. The tetron with hypetrofic
mass and short „life“ (about 10-8 sec) is called a pion decays mostly to
muon and neutrino muon‘s, for example (pp'np') → (np‘) + (pp'). For
example, in the anomalous decay of mesons K and Eta also arises
tetron (pp'np'), but this meson have unlike mion much greater mass in
its massfield and thus their decays particle obtain during "parceling" a
resonant' okton have sufficient mass than the tetron (pp'np') that
extended significantly his life. than they falls to the same two duons
as the decay of muon. The tetron with hypetrofic mass and short „life“
(about 10-8 sec) is called a pion decays mostly to muon and neutrino
muon‘s, for example (pp'np') →(np‘) + (pp').
Decays of pi mesons, or pions are schematically shown in the
following two decay series. Pi meson is actually the same unstable
conglomerate of protoels. Pions, as unstable tetron are actually
products of decays of particles with significantly greater mass, for
example: mesons K, D, or hyperons. Therefore, to their „life“ do not
need assistance of kvartons.
Scheme of real decay tetron‘s pi- pi +, as unstable vakants charged
pions.
(see the animation of decay the pions in enclosure)
From that picture you can see that the pions have two protoels with
higher mass level (marked with more fat ring). From decay gets every
fragment one protoel with greater mass. Decay of pion creates more
massive duons ie muon's variety. This interchangeability of mion and
electron is also confirmed by the realized experiments . Of course,
the true mirror process: n + mí- → p +neutrino mí
Miror changes p→n with participation of muon
(see the animation of miror changes p→n in attachment)
Heavy mesons K, D and eta are actually modifications of the basic pi
mesons, but with protoely at higher mass levels. (As evidenced by the
decay of K mesons in muon + muon neutrino, or eta meson into two
leptons + photon). This creates a large spectrum of mesons at different
of mass levels. Because they are basically the vakants of unstable
tetrons, and during their passage through the first kvarton their husks
of massfield arises resonance okton, eg (pp'np'+pp'nn'). This 8
protoels conglomerate with large mass already offers great
opportunities for its anomalous decay into "components" such as pi
mesons, muons, leptons e-, e +, neutrinos and gamafotons. Those
decays are often cascade' process in which the mass of decay
"components" such as pi mesons, in its passage through the nearest
kvarton recreates decay of okton and it immediately breaks down, to
the well-known scheme for leptons. All types of mesons can exist in
all possible variations and therefore, their breakdown products can be
in three states of cartridge. However, a wonderful example of the
decay of variability of high excitated tetron with higher mass are its
protoels modifications o f decay Eta mesons, K and D. All of these
modifications exhibit, due its superhypertrofic mass diverse in range
of opportunities they decays into "basic components" of leptons. I
mention here only the typical decays of mesons with classic and
kvarton‘s writing are all consequences of anomalous transition tetron
with a high degree of excitation protoels (mass), through strongly
excited kvarton.
Standard of kvarton‘s writing of decay
eta → e +, e-,+ y
(pp'nn') + (pp'nn') → (pn') + (p'n) + (pp'nn')
K → mí, ný + y
(pp'pn ') + (pp'nn') → (pn ') + (pp') + (pp'nn')
0
K → pí + mí + ný (p'nn'n) + (pp'nn ') → (pp'nn') + (np) + (nn')
K+ → pí0 e+ +, ný (pp'pn ') + (pp'nn') → (pp'nn ') (pn') + pp ')
K0 → pi+ + mu-+ ný (pp'nn ') + (pp'nn') → (pn'nn ') + (np') +(pp')
K0 → pi-, e++ ný
(pp'nn') + (pp'nn') → (np'nn') + (pn') + (pp')
0
+
K → pi + pi
(pp'nn') + (pp‘nn') → pp'pn ') + (np'nn')
Hyperons.
Like duons and tetrons may be exists in short life with higher mass
also singlons mainly vakants (p) and (n). With most excited kvarton
they created ultrashortlife kvinton‘s resonances with several of mass
levels - hyperons. Like a hypertrophied duons and hypertrophied
tetrons also hyperons ultrafastly decay either to hyperons with lower
mass levels, or directly back to singlons (p) and (n), always with due
accompaniment of excited tetronos pions. Also hypertrophied tetron
ultrashortly may exist in multiple mass levels as K mesons, and any
other types of mesons, with the amount of mass. All these types of
excitated tetrons quickly decay into single nucleons and leptons.
Some creations hyperons:
Standard records
pí- + p → lambda0 + K0
pí- + p → Sigma- + K0
pí- + p → n + K+ + Kp + p → p + lambda0 + K+
kvarton’ records
(np’nn‘) + (p) + (pp’nn‘)→ (npp’nn‘) + (pp’nn‘)
(np’nn‘) +(p) + (pp’nn‘) → (pn’nn‘)+(pp’nn‘) +(pp’nn‘)
(np’nn‘) + (p) + (pp’nn‘) → (n) + (pp’pn‘) + (np’nn‘)
(p) +(p) + 2x(pp’nn‘) → (p) + (ppp’nn‘) + (pp’pn‘)
Several types of decay of hyperons:
Standard record
Lambda0 → n + pí0
Lambda0 → p + e- + ný
antiLam0 → p- + pí+
kvarton’ record
(npp’nn‘) → (n) + (pp’nn‘)
(npp’nn‘) → (p) + (np‘) +(nn‘) + (pp’nn‘)
(n’pp’nn‘) → (p‘) + (pn’nn‘)
To do this, is only need to add that all intermediate pi mesons and
continued mí duons they decays into form e-, e+, ný, antiný. These
meson’s decay suggests that these material bodies are formed by
collisions the singlons with very high uprest mass , when they
suddenly released highly excited massfields of kvartons and singlons
together form a conglomerate several kvartons bound state, which,
however, due the high instability quickly decays to tetrons and duons.
All shoots with same bullets
The origin of the electrical charge unit across whole physics
KMV elegantly solves an ancient of elementary mystery physics: why
have all types elemementary particles exactly the same particle, unit,
electric charge. This is due to the fact that in all types of vakants with
electrical hub is one protoel g The origin of the unit electrical charge
across whole physics
KMV elegantly solves an ancient mystery of elementary physics: why
have all types elemementary particles exactly the same unit of electric
charge. This is due to the fact that in all types of vakants with
electrical charge is one protoel from group P, with the uncompensated
charge. Make it singlon (p) as vakant of proton, duons (pn') and (p'n)
as vakants of leptons e-, e+, mu-, mu+, or pi+ or p- pions, kaons K-
K+, hyperons , and many other elementary charged particles. It is
always due that their charge is induced by the presence of one
charged uncompensated protoel from group P with electric unit in
their vakant. One protoel of group P with uncompensated charge.
Make it singlon (p) as vakant of proton, duons (pn') and (p'n) as
vakants of leptons e-, e+, mu-, mu+, or pi+ or pí- , pions, kaons K- K+,
hyperons or S+, S-, and many other elementary charged particles. It is
always due that their charge is induced by the presence of one
charged uncompensated protoel of group P with electric unit in
vakant.
For KMV are useless two types of fractional charge of quarks to
create a multitude of so-called elementary particles. Grotesque is the
case intermediálu W-emission. The quark d has charge only onethird. Since the W-meson has the whole unit electric charge, he should
be the poor man quark "undress" a his vest,with one-third of charge
minus and his trousers with two-thirds minus charge . So after the
excommunication his W-meson remains him only the gym pants with
a two-thirds positive charge. and became suddenly in proton. But what
the devil did not want even later proton decided to decay back to
neutron and by "born" W+ meson, during which sacrifices its twothirds plus charge. The classics question is: how constantly the quark
"produces" and transmits positive and negative fractional charge to
decay mesons W with unit charge? These are incredible mysteries of
quantum physics, which simply do not exist in the KMV! The
classics physicists have this explanation: Mr. Heisenberg said that
them mesons it on a fraction time allows. But, where takes the poor
quark, for a fraction time, this the no limited mass for creations W
meson, Mr. Heisenberg not says. He claims only that this mass the
quark on the short time may have, but where it takes it, Mr.
Heisenberg no longer says. Fortunately, KMV does not need these
crutches!
Part IV
The main stones for Socrates' hypothesis
Similarly the particles gracefully waves ...
Wave’s properties of elementary particles.
It's time to mention the useful applications kvarton‘s model of
vacuum. One of them is a causal explanation of the wavelength
characteristics of elementary particles. Phenomenon that literally
shook the classical physics and the foundations of quantum mechanics
is called duality of the elementary particles. Classical physics
generally accepted view on struktur elementary microparticles as zero
dimensional objects got first crack in the form of the phenomenon,
which until then had only guided electromagnetic; waves in some
situations elementary particles behave "irrationally" as a macroscopic
wave. V.I. Rydnik you to complain: Electron could be regarded as a
point particle, if it were not inextricably linked to the wave. Her guilt
is blurred as if the position of the electron, which can be located at any
point of its waves.The most integral wave thought Rydnik de
Broglie‘s hypothetical mathematical wave yet unknown properties
that supposedly accompanies each particle with which this wave is
unknown physical way connected. Nobody, not even Rydnik know
how this wave arises, from what is material yet many did not know
how close was the de Broglie with his idea to reality behavior
elementary particles, except for the unfortunate "fuzziness"
position. The most famous feature is the manifestation of wave
interference elementary particles on the doublespot. R. Feynman
called it, the heart of quantum mechanics. " And he knew why! The
causal interpretation of this physical phenomenon wrecked classical
and relativistic physics and finally in a sense, quantum mechanics.
The phenomenon is based on the assumption that the coherent
electromagnetic beam waves passes through two slots close that it
becomes, by Fresnel images, new sources of coherent electromagnetic
passing waves. Coherent waves from two nearby resources slots
interfere together and create on the screen (display) maximum light
stripes interspersed with streaks of minimum illumination. Fresnel
physics this reliably predicts and explains. A completely different
situation occurs when electromagnetic space. waves sent to
doublespot elementary particles. Classical and any subsequent
physical theories describe elementary particles as almost spot
formations with dimensions much smaller than the distance between
the two slots ..Much to the surprise of physicists, passing elementary
particles (electrons), to doublespot (in fact a reflection of the
crystalline metal wire grid) on the screen has the same shape after
bending impact of electrons as the passage of light waves. QED this
"paradox" "solved" the mathematical wave function, which, however,
has no real physical interpretation .. Although the probability of
different stretches position elementary particles "throughout the
universe", but the basic problem passing elementary particles either
both or one slot causally solve!! Richard Feynman in the concept of
his theory, all trajectories', even hopelessly fantasizes about the many
ways to both electron slots when through all possible paths, even in
the constellation Andromeda, to then "somehow" passed through both
slots. The problem does not lie in exotic orbits of electrons before
passing through the slot, but in principle, to pass contemporary
through both!
Feynman’s phantasmagoria of all possible paths does present,
electron transmission through the two slots (which is the condition of
its inerference) excluded. Or maybe that electron can move in every
conceivable speeds? How else can you just, for the hell, of it to fly
over the renowned Andromeda and get the real-time simultaneous
passage of both slots? The biggest antiphyzicum QED is the collapse
of the wave function. Probability here, the probability of there when
the "stray" particles actually appear somewhere, it's completely
noncausal wave function in plants. Causality here gets into the
mystique.
How is "looking" for interference of elementary particles on
double slits the kvarton’s physics?
It must be said that the primary cause of this phenomenon is the fact
that vakant (submicroscopic "eye") of elem. particles are moving in
their three-dimensional lattice kvarton‘s "world" literally "dragged"
and directed the move with asymmetric makrovolume elevator
massfield. (See principle of motion). Therefore, it is quite normal that
passes itself vakant although one particular slit, but his makrovolume
massfield as well as the solenoid. wave passes through both slits
conveniently provided that they are sufficiently close together. Thus
macroscopic field mass particles through both slits just like
electromagnetic wave with all the consequences and, therefore,
interferes with the slits. Slits for the interference of coherent mass
wavefronts from both slits create a "transport" channels of excitation
maxima between minima. Vakant passed one of the slits to "take"
immediate "transport channel" with a maximum asymmetry of
excitation, which then leads reliably vakant of electron to the display.
From the description it is clear that he is not a group interference
beam elem. particles. The phenomenon of interference occurs when
each individual passage of a single particle and its massfield trough
doubleslits. The rational interpretation not need any wave function
with its collapse, spreading almost any point of the electron around the
universe! But the fact is that the massfield excitation of electron
theory extends throughout the universe, but technically the real
dimension of the electron does not exceed a thousand vakant its size
when the level of excitation kvartons is 1 millionth of the value of the
first excitation excit. shell. Wave frequency associated with
asymmetrical massfield is given by the slope (gradient) of that
asymmetry. I therefore pleased to declare that "the heart of quantum
physics" flagrantly testifies usefulness kvartonového model vacuum
(KMV)
Mention
In the last decade of the last century, scientists tried to catch
powerfully electron during its passage through one of the slits. They
invented a lot and been around it much ado: electron behaves
differently when observed, when no one else "stare". Elementary
particles have been attributed to psychological characteristics diva.
You could call it for funy: humanizing elementary particles. Some
scientists have started more interested in the psyche particles than in
physics. Had a bit of thinking logically, they would overlook that a
necessary condition of any interference is coherence masswaves from
the two slots. Any slightest effort to identify the physical passage
vakant through one slot is associated with the interaction with the
meter apparatus with flow masswaves for doubleslot and logically
leads to a distortion the coherence and thereby to cancel interference.
So far they did not get it.
Pseudophyscical cases.
In this section, I will discuss several cases in my flawed with respect
to protophysics, interpretation of some important physical experiments
they have fatally affected the development of physics.
What is lighter? Pounds of feathers or a pound of iron?
Pound, Rebka and their gamafotons in gravitational field.
Invariance of photons in gravitational field, or about one scientific
mystification.
These two physicists devised a very sophisticated experiment which
wanted to verify one of the theses of OTR. This Theses refers of
changes the passage of time, in gravitational field depending on the
gravitational potential. They used a very accurate method of
Mössbauer resonance absorption of the photon. The principle of
resonance absorption asserted Pound and Rebka is as follows: heavy
gama photon emitted by radioactive nuclei 57Cu during its decay to
57
Fe can be resonantly captured by a different atom kernel, 57Fe, only
when the energy difference of his emission and absorption is zero..
In other words, the photon will be captured of nucleus 57Fe, only that
its energy corresponds exactly to difference between the energy
levels of the absorbing nucleus. If is different, not absorption. In the
old water tower in Harvard Institute of Physics, the physicists P+ R
emit gamaphotons, once from bottom to top, second from the top to
bottom. Gamaphotons from the decay of nuclei 57Cu let them fall in
the iron detector The photon detector placed behind the iron target,
recorded the intensity of gamaphotons of their absorption in the iron
target in dependence on the difference gravitational potential
between the emitter and absorbent. After the performed measurements
was concluded that intensity of absorption depends on the
gravitational potential. P+R deduced from this measurement that the
photons in gravitational field changes its frequency. But they
measured not the actual total energy/mass of gamaphotons! They
only found out, that it had changed the ratio of energy/mass of
gamafotons and energy/mass of nuclear levels of nucleons in target
!!! RNDr. Ullmann specifies that: „If energy of gamma quanta is
exactly equal to the energy of nuclear levels,of Fe57 can be such a
gamaphoton absorbed by this core. . If these two values of energy,
emission and absorption, isn't quite near, resonant absorption no
occurs.“ Both scientists find out only this: when the emitter and
absorber aren‘t at the same height in gravitational field, changing the
conditions for resonance absorption. Nothing more! In no case didn‘t
measure directly mass/frequency gamafotons! But exactly the same
way has changed the mass of nucleons in detector: When nucleons
have been carry upwards it increase their mass in gravitational field
and photons seems to be against them lighter. If they return down,
increase their binding in gravitational field and they return acquired
mass. And the photons seems to be against them hevier. So if photons
flying up out of gravipole, they meet with an increasingly heavier
nucleons. If they flies down to the centre of gravitational field meet
with lighter nucleons. There, below are nucleons gravitationally more
bound ie they are lighter than these on the above where nucleons are
less bound, in the gravitational field therefore, have a greater mass
than those below. I 'm calculated that relative change of rest mass of
nucleons emitter i absorber in gravitational field is the same as
relative change in mass of fotons!!! But no, absolute exactly, but
"only" on 14 decimal places! Is that enough? Just change height in the
earth's gravitational field about 22.6 m and the relative change of rest
mass of measuring apparatus (due to changes gravitational binding
with height),is the same as was in experiment P+R in their
measurements in Harvards water tower.
dmn = 2,19 . 10-15
So who is right? Gentlemens P+R have found only this: a photon that
flies in gravitational field toward up to detector must be for reaching
resonant absorption to stimulate the emitter by movement of toward
up. If the emitter photon is at the top and in bottom is detector thus
to achieve resonance is necessary move the detector toward down.
Thats all that was mesured. With movements by apparatus (emitter,
detector) was compensate the differences in the rest masses of the
nucleons, arising from different their locations in the gravitational
field. It had itself shows what changes in the gravitational field.
In reality, the situation since the Newton time is this: if the emitter and
absorbent are at the same potential-level in gravitational field,
nucleons of emitter and nucleons of absorbent have exactly the same
weight and nothing prevents resonance capture of emitting photons
arising from the disintegration of the nucleus 57Cu with nucleus 57Fe
of absorbent. With different of their hight changes their rest mass and
disturbs resonance capture
If P + R emitter placed down and absorbent up to the tower, they
supplied by plotting absorbent up to his nukleons a little more weight
(there is reduced their gravitional bond!) than the nucleons in emitter
below. If the emitter they brought up, than his nucleons are contrary to
"slap" heavier than nucleons of absorbent on bottom, (thereby the
higher gravitational binding). These facts are well known in the
Middle Ages; gentlemen P + R ignored it. Why? It is hard to
speculate. Probably just wanted to serve to his dream.
It is, after all think that in the stronger gravitional field below the
tower is the emitter of nuclei nucleons slightly lighter and
therefore emit up to top gamafotons slightly "lighter" than the
gamafotons from emitter if it is at the top of tower, where the
nucleons are slightly heavier and of course sending down to
absorbent "heavier" photons.
Bearers of wrong ideas in their time will get truth by history!
To mister Swansont:
Yes, easy life have those who have everytime this correct true. And
do not mind them that their true is frequently changes. But I would
not change with them!
And that was the difference in weight of the gamaphotons and the
measured meter of P + R. First of all, they should know, that all the
free (ie not gravitional bound) material objects in gravitional field (ie
if they are in free motion) no change its overall weight! Why should
be changed its weight free photons?! Unfortunately P+R prefer to
attendance Benefiting to GTR. In this benefiting there is some
mysterious deceleration of time, but only to decrease (due to the
gravitational bond) inertial mass of elementary particles which, due to
the lower mass, naturally emit photons with a lower mass/frequency
than the same elementary particles they are outside of gravitational
field. Yes, the clock driven with photons of Balmer‘s line, broadcast
from hydrogen atom from the sun, will lag to the same clock
controlled Balmer’s line broadcast of terrestrial hydrogen atoms. But
it's not due to some esoteric deceleration time on the sun, but just
because on the sun they have a lighter, ie gravitationally bounded
hydrogen atoms, which broadcast to Earth lighter (ie less frequent)
photons. It's all just blacksmith 'physics.
P + R in their calculations entirely neglected the change of rest mass
its measuring apparatus with a height in a gravitational field. Their
measurements found only a relative change of the photon mass
ratio to the mass measuring device. More specifically: change of
neutron mass to the iron atom in the target. Interpretation of the two
opposing variants: a / with increasing height in the gravitation field
realistically reduce weight increasing photon, while neutrons in the
target weight has not changed, or b / with height in gravitational field
is reduced gravitational binding and increased weight of the
apparatus, (target nucleons), while the mass of the photon with the
height remains constant. In both variants increased the ratio mn / mf.
And this increased relative weight ratio of neutrons to photons
gentlemen P + R measured. Who knows the law every physical
binding, including binding of bodies in a gravitational field, he knows
that in the direction of decline gravitational potential, ie to the center
of the earth, growing size of the gravitational binding elements which
is necessarily accompanied by shrinkage (emanation) their resting
energy /mass. Therefore, contrary for distant objects out of
gravitational field need them the (in fall)surrendered binding
energy/mass to deliver. This "service" done them gentlemen L + R
when measuring apparatus brought up there in the water tower. It is
still very small, but for that experiment a significant amount of
weight, which, they passed to the nucleons in their apparatus , when
bring them up. The apparatus thus has above "the slap" of rest mass
greater than down. The relative increase in mass of the apparatus
(nucleons) has exactly the same value (2.20. 10-15), that is
calculated as the relative frequency reduction/mass of the photon!
Thus, if the mass of nucleons in target with his height increases, then
logically don‘t alter the mass of freely moving photons, the achieving
measured relative changes in weight!
The conclusion is that the experiment P + R showed complete
invariance mass (frequency) of photons as they travelin trough
gravitational field. Of course, if the atoms are closer to the center of
gravity are thus, due to gravitational binding "lighter" and theys
electrons also emit "lighter" photons, ie photons with less frequency.
Cesium clocks, which are controlled by frequency photon radiation of
cesium atoms, ie go down slower than the clock located above, out of
gravifield. Naturally. Einstein concluded from this that the time in the
gravifield, thanks to his equations goes slowing. If, however, used a
controlled pendulum clock would have found that these times they are
going down faster than the top. Finito.
Graphical representation of error Lords Pound and Rebka in
their measurement frequency (weight) of photons in gravifield
rectangle = measuring apparatus at different distances from the
surface colored blue planet
the small disk = photon flying out of the earth‘s gravifield
Shades of brown rectangles represent increasing rest mass of
measuring apparatur with height in the gravitational field
Permanent light brown color of disk-photon is invariant mass of the
photon expressed in gravifield. Growing differences of color
saturation of apparatus due to the invariant color of the photon
expresses the relative change in the measured mass in experiment P +
R
The case of Cepheids
Blinking dolls in the universe
Rancorous relativists like to emphasize that no one who is moving
inertia alone can not detect this your movement. They said no one can
ever know who really and inertialy moves. If the universe to man, or
man against the universe. He can! I've compiled a thought experiment
called: Cepheids. Some will know these "candles of universe", which
changes its brightness with a fairly accurate frequencies of the order of
days. Each has its own characteristic Cepheid period changes of
intensity, and it is like her identity card. And this cepheids periodicity
can be used to know own inertial motion. Imagine this: astronauts are
issued at 0.96 c (Lorentz factor = 5) on a journey through space. They
fly somewhere inertial motion of the star Alpha the route, which is
exactly perpendicular to the direction of the Large Magellanic Cloud
(LMC), where there are several Cepheids with known periodicity
changes in brightness. Those astronauts are any sharpeners, know
these Cepheids and their periodicity and honestly counted it during the
flight. Recorded periods of all Cepheids in LMC. When they fly the
distance to the star Alpha, which is located from the Earth about 4.9
ly, they find that their on-board clock is only one year from the start.
From the records of Cepheids peroidicity but finds that the number of
changes of each Cepheid luminosity corresponding totals in 5 years,
not just one year. So they have this dilemma: either to increase five
times the frequency of all observed Cepheids in LMC against to
values known from terrestrial monitoring, or them significantly, (ie on
the fifth), slowed their comparative internal time in ship (ship‘s
hours). And because, as I wrote, they aren‘t no pencil sharpeners,
which can be drunk crap STR of the contraction the surrounding
space, clearly they came to the conclusion that with the universe has
nothing terrible happened in the form of horrible contractions, but just
them, due to their real motion and five times increased their restmass,
slowed down their own shipping time. Nothing more! Instead of
earthly (and galactic) five years they filmed their clocks just one
year.
One particularly insightful, sailor expressed the opinion that it is
possible that their ship and they themselves gained in accelerating on
the c = 0.96 in 5 times more weight than their earthly resting. And so
peacefully they came to what I say already before some years: that
with creasing uprest mass of objects decreased their intrinsic
reactivity, or their internal time. This phenomenon is called a dilation
of time. And at this valuable experience gave to the Earthlings
(because who knows when and if ever return to Earth), they sent back
to Earth along with photos of stars Alpha an information on the
number of recorded periods of Cepheids in the LMC, from their start
to meeting with Alfa and a true local time in their ship while passing
around the star Alpha. On Earth "arrived" these data after 10-years
from their start of Earth. Earthlings number of periods Cepheids are
not surprised, because they know that the star Alpha is 4.9 light years
distant and so the ship‘s fly on it took to five Earth‘s years. Number of
earthlings recorded of Cepheid period luminosity is responsible. The
only thing it does not ship‘s hours is the time recorded when passing
the star Alpha. Because even among the earthlings were some smart
people thought the same thing as the keen sailor: Thanks fivefold,
uprest mass of the ship and all that is in it, they are the fifth slowed
their internal time. Earthly and galactic time went by, however,
despite the STR, throughout the journey astronauts evenly and calmly
5 times faster than the time the boat. Lessons from the cases Cepheid
is this: Moving of material object to kvarton‘s field (threedimensional lattice) is verifiable. I believe it will be possible to detect
the absolute motion in itself a moving object, such as its asymmetry
massfield. For example, can be appropriately measured in experiment
asymmetry massfield of globe (his gravifield) in the direction of its
movement. My approximate calculation of the asymmetry of
gravifield on aur globe for his planetary motion is about 1nano. In the
direction of motion the earth are all atoms of 1 nano its normal value
heavier (due to the velocity of massfields asymmetry) and therefore
accurate, eg cesiums clock had to go on the side of the globe in his
direction of its motion, more slowly than on its opposite side. Ones
will be performed experiment to prove this prediction.
Just look to each his own good heart ...;
Physical nature of nuclear forces (so far just my speculation;
stump). Atomic nuclei are "strongest" microobjekts in space. The
fundamental condition of a nuclear ties within atomic nuclei is the
singlvakants of groups P and N, ie vakants neutrons and protons.
There is no stable atomic nucleus consisting only of protons or only of
neutrons. Although classical physics says that nuclear "force" between
the proton and neutron are the same as between two protons, or
between two neutrons. If this were the tru, there could be a stable
nucleus onlyof protons (mainly nuclei with fewer protons) or only of
neutrons. Theres no exist! So it is clear evidence of the necessity of
the presence of both types of nucleons in the formation of nuclei.
(Helium core is actually the macropicture of kvarton with replacement
antiprotoels (p '), (n') to protoels (p), (n)). Socrates physics explains
the existence of atomic nuclei bygrupe antipodity (P-N) between
protoelements (p) and (n). The established bond between protoely (p)
and (n) is probably mainly at the expense the loss mass of protoel (n)
and therefore in the nucleus are never to "decay" of bond neutron (if it
don’t exceed number of neutrons in the nucleus to optimality P-N
bond. Strongest, ie with the highest deficit of the bonded mass are
symmetric nuclei with the same number of protons and neutrons.
however, with the growth of protoels (p) grows its electric hub and
grows their negation grupe links between nucleons in the nucleus and
therefore this binding deficit is offsets by increasing the number of
unbalanced protoels (n), which increase grupe binding in core and
eliminate the destructive charge repulsion of protoels (p). If, however,
a large surplus(supercritical) number of neutrons in the nucleus
(especially for nuclei with a small number of nucleons), decreases
between neutrons share their mass of grupe links and, therefore, can
any of these excess neutrons to get his binding mass back and be
"fragments" as any of the free neutron.
"Cosmic" muons as verifikants of STR
Muons falling on the Earth's surface due to the interaction atoms in the
high atmosphere with particles of cosmic ray have been declared for
the relativist direct confirmation of the validity of that same STR
reciporocitys relativistic effects predicted by Einstein's special theory
of relativity. What was then directly measured and confirmed by
experiments? Nothing else, only that the muons generated by mention
interactions with atoms at an altitude of 20-30 km still hit to the
Earth's surface. Which shows that their „halflife" is not resting two
microsec, but at least 40 times larger, ie at least 80 microsec. That's
all that was directly measured of physics! In any experimental
device wasn‘t actually measured the alleged own country time
slows down, against the muon‘s itself time, or the contraction
height of the "birth" muon above the surface of the Earth! These
are all just reasoning, assuming that this must muon "see." It is one of
the stupidest statements of physicis: "from look of" muon slows down
time across the whole globe and longitudinal contraction. Real
physical phenomena and states are not "real" only ‚from look‘ of a
subject, but in the relation to kvarton‘s vacuum environment. Greatly
increased "lifetime" muon, can be logically explained by many times
magnified muon‘s masses, not due to the very large velocity muon,
but just to the opposite: high translational speed of the muon is
induced by high gradient of asymmetry his massfield and much
greater his mass. This high up-rest mass of muon exceeding 40 times
muon’s rest mass, of course its the tru cause of the 40-multiple
slowdown of internal muon‘s reactivity, its internal time.
Gravimons
is a logical consequence of gravitational binding saturation
phenomenon is sufficiently great set material objects (atoms). Each
physical link is accompanied by the (realized), zooming out (emited)
external mass, ie mass as excitation kvartons in the mass field of
particles, or a set of physical objects all spatial sizes. It is a necessary
condition for any physical bonding, which is added to the excitation of
all kvartons in common field(additive) Common fields bounds the
objects at all internal connectors between these objects. Of course, at
the expense of external excitation parts of total mass array of these
objects. With the gradual gravitational convergence of whole set of
material objects thus increasing excitation of kvartons of internal
connecting line within the file, as the gravitational bond between these
objects and in parallel decreases excitation on outside the combined
mass of the whole file. If is reached the convergence material objects,
their degree of internal gravitational binding Evaz numerical value of
the original total rest mass of the whole set of objects (scattered far
away in space) MO . c2, there is a phenomenon called gravitational
binding saturation, when the mass of Mg external gravitational field
of the whole macroset goes to zero. To further contraction of the
macroset and thus to further increase the internal gravitational binding
is not a physical reason, no longer to pay off the amount of macroset,
ie gravitational binding could not be greater! This state atoms
stellar macro set with virtually zero external gravitational field I called
gravitational monolith - in short, gravimon.
It's similar an giant macropolymer analogy of kvarton. The bondary
between the internal field of kvartons in this macroset are, deleted ', all
protoels are an huge macrocrystals in which each protoel firm the
position on the way of atoms in crystals of metals and salts. If the allout saturation binding antipodean protoels inside kvarton convergence
occurs when the 4 antipodean protoels are in supercritical volume,
then to total saturation of gravitational binding of monopodean objects
(nucleons), occurs by the supercritical convergence immense macroset
these objects. And there is realised then, when Evaz = Mo.c2. So when
coupling energy/mass is equal to the rest mass/energy of all
gravitationally bound objects. According to various models of
gravitational binding spherical bodys would to total saturation of the
star gravitational binding should occur during contraction in traffic on
the radius Rsat = Rg / 2 to 2Rg / 5 . Radius of saturated volume of this
star, is always Rsat > 0. I believe that such astronomical objects in the
universe are. It is the final stage of "life" macrostars. Unlike the so
called black holes, they havenť zero radius, and they lack an external
gravitational field. Cosmic particles collides with this object
immediately totally emited their mass and become an integral part of
the "protoels" macrocrystal. Now you make a great speculation: Gust
of dust grains in to intergalactic gas when once they lose (radiates) in
falling to gravimon his whole mass, can be a source ultrahigh
energetic cosmic rays (E > 1021 eV), whose source is yet unknown to
astrophysicists.
In conclusion, "for amusement in the room", I'll have one more
"crazy" speculation about the origin of the cosmic background
radiation. Based on the ideas of space filled with kvartons
continuously attacking us, perhaps heretical thought: how to pass
through this material environment photons of electromagnetic
radiation? Dissemination in space is alternately intersecting generate
electric and magnetic fields at every point (kvarton) on theys routes. Ie
the spread of each photon quanta as mass/energy with the speed of c is
of the advancing realized by excitations and retroactively nulity of
kvartons all along the route of its spread. Is this mediation activities of
kvartons completely selfless? Transmit to neighboring kvartons ideal
and totally all the energy/mass of a photon? Not remain them in
"fingernails" even selfsmallest division of photon’s energy? Normally,
about, by the standards of anthropology, not. But for the "endless"
kvarton‘s universe between galaxies and their clusters this would be
perhaps ideal, lossless transmitter of course by the absence of gravity.
The gravitational field is characterized by the fact that it interferes the
intergalactic structure of kvarton’s "ocean". Gravitational field
distorts the nulityes homogeneity of that "ocean". Such gravitationally
disturbed environment ceases to be an ideal lossless, superconducting
photons lightconductor. Walking kvartons are "scraped" of their quite
negligible mass. So photons that travel through this disturbed space
over large intergalactic distances come to Earth those inhomogenities
somewhat " scraped" ie with reduced mass. The reduced mass of the
photon, however, is reduced its wave frequency. Astronomers this
understandably reflected as "redness" of photons. For the larger
distance photons come, the more "scraped", ie redder. And what is
happening with the "finely grate ' mass on the path of photons?
Kvartons seized scraped energy/mass gradually "warm up" and
become in the absolute frost (t → 0 ° K) the secondary sources very
low heat radiation, proportional to the temperature "emitters" A lot
probably think, don‘t be it ‚very low heat radiation’ the famous relict
radiation? Yes, of course it's very possible! Then obviously its "blush"
extragalaktic photons and the existence of the cosmic background
radiation as "swarf" are two sides of the same coin: gravitational
microinhomogenity of physical vacuum environment. This original
explanation of both phenomena has one huge cosmological advantage:
needs no Big Bang, or some inflationary "blown away" of the
universe, even catastrophic false vacuum phase transition. ‚Reding'
kcosmic photons therefore does not indicate mad dash galaxies and so
called relic radiation from the Big Bang does not come! The universe
had no beginning in BB and therefore may not be (somewhere?)
expand! He was here, is here, it will be here! For ever and ever, would
tell the curate. Sekula sekulorum, said the Pope. I ask you, "in the
room": Is it crazy enough?
I'm a little puzzled so called accelerated expansion. Astronomers have
measured a certain disproportion between the distance and magnitude
of galaxies from the Hubble resulting formula for the relationship
between distance and the degree of spectral shift. Astronomers have
just discovered that the Hubble formula for very distant luminous
objects are not linear. Very distant galaxies are apparently moving
away faster than them by Hubble. It concluded that the expansion is
accelerating galaxies. Why the very distant exhibit excessive Doppler
values receding? Simple explanation given in the following chart of
photons passing a huge amount of galaxies and their gravitational
fields. Distance on the chart is plotted logarithmically for its
reduction. On this graph, it is clear that the photons passed from
distant sources, which is the passage trough the strong gravitational
field galaxies frequently. In these sections of the path of the photons
in extended gravitational excitations is impaired lightcoducting of
kvarton‘s continuum and thus there is a magnified "grating" photons.
Hubble formula is tested for radiation galaxies of nearby universe
'where there is no path trough a strong gravitational field. Therefore,
the degree of spectral shift, "redness", depending on the distance
resources is smaller.
This interpretation of "accelerated expansion" still shows the same
thing: no stampede of galaxies, let alone accelerated, not only the light
from very distant galaxies is due to 'the more frequent passage nearby
galaxies more "scraped" than would correspond to Huble close
relationship to the universe.
The following chart also explains, in my opinion, Olbers paradox
absence seamless brightness across the sky. Light radiation
infrauniverse to us occurs only in the infrared and microwave region.
This diagram explains the apparent accelerating expansion of the
universe and also remote so called Olbers paradox: light rays of
galaxies infrauniverse by the way to the Earth moves into the invisible
infrared spectrum. All this applies, provided that the passage of light
trough the gravitational fields galaxies assigned the higher
translational loss of energy (mass), than its passage trough the space
outside the galaxy.
Interpretation of phenomena such as spectral shift of EMR, or redshift,
relict radiation RR and indirectly also purported "accelerated
stampede Galaxy" is based on two premises:
The entire universe is filled with material structure that isn’t rigid
nature, therefore has a nonzero but finite value of the modulus of
elasticity E (0 < E <∞). This means that such structure or its
components, is capable of harmonic oscillation towards some nulityes
state. So to be able to transmit trough the space some physical
oscillation is necessary to have an correspondence environment, that
is not materially empty but not rigid, motionless.
The second premise assumes that lightcoducting of area is the largest
in the state of least excitation of its material elements (kvartons), ie
absolute homogeneity kvarton‘s continuum. Then lightcoducting
achieves state of superconductivity. With the growth of excitation
kvartons and other inhomogeneities aof continuum rate is declining
lightcoductivityes given environment.
The fact that the space is very ‚flexible ' convince us alone existence
of the gravitational field. When is inserted into the (empty) space
physical body its mass excites in the space around him gravitational
field that disrupts the status null and void of each kvartons, as
elements of this gravitational field and thus the homogeneity of this
field, that was before inserting this gravitational body, empty
kvarton‘s continuum. If this material continuum hasn‘t a property of
elasticity, then if you should remove excitation objects from this area,
nothing will leads to spontaneous canceling the gravitational field, ie
return back the kvartons in null and void positions! If I know
Einstein's GTR of elasticity modulus of space no considered. And it
does not deal with who and what force returns the gravitational state
of kvartons backward into state of kvarton‘s nullification. I ask you:
What straightens from gravity curved geometry of space? Some
antigravityes perhaps?
[email protected]