Download Climate Change, Peak Fossil Fuels, and

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

100% renewable energy wikipedia , lookup

Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup

Energiewende in Germany wikipedia , lookup

Fossil fuel phase-out wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup

Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Energy, Food, Climate Change, and the Rise of China:
Scenarios of Global Crisis
Dr. Minqi Li, Assistant Professor
Department of Economics, University of Utah
1645 E. Campus Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Phone: 801-828-5279; E-mail: [email protected]
June 2007
Contribution to Marxist Renewal
Capitalism is an economic system based on the production for profit and
accumulation of capital. The endless pursuit of profit and accumulation inevitably
leads to material production and consumption on increasingly larger scales that tend
to deplete the earth’s resources and pollute the environment.
These processes are now reaching their ecological limits. In the coming decades,
global capitalism is likely to be confronted with multiple major crises arising from the
depletion of fossil fuels, declining food production, and potential catastrophes
associated with climate change. It is the opinion of this author that it is impossible for
these crises to be resolved within the historical framework of capitalism. The survival
of the humanity is at stake. The resolution of the global environmental crisis requires
an alternative social system, which is based on production for use, rational allocation
of global resources with democratic planning, and equitable distribution, that is, a
world socialist planned economy.
After the 1976 counter-revolutionary coup, China’s bureaucratic capitalist class fully
consolidated its political power. Since then, the capitalist relations of production have
been established in China and China has become increasingly incorporated into the
global capitalist economy. In recent years, China has become a leading driving force
for the global capitalist economy. Some speculate that China will replace the US to
become the next hegemony, and lead a successful restructuring of the capitalist world
system.
In fact, capitalist accumulation in China has led to social and environmental crisis at
home, and by greatly accelerating the consumption of energy and other resources, has
played a major role in intensifying the global environmental crisis.
The next section discusses the relationship between capitalist accumulation and the
global environmental crisis. The rest of the paper presents several scenarios of global
1
ecological crisis, discussing the depletion of fossil fuels, declining food production,
climate change, and China’s growing impact on the global environment.
Capitalism and the Global Environmental Crisis
Capitalist states and individual capitalists engage in constant, intense competition
against each other. To prevail in competition, capitalists are motivated as well as
compelled to use a substantial portion of their profits for capital accumulation.
If the organic composition of capital (the ratio of means of production to labor power)
is constant, capital accumulation must proceed no faster than the growth of the labor
force or the population. Otherwise, capital accumulation would soon deplete the
reserve army of labor, driving down the profit rate and leading to crisis. 1
To be freed from the constraint of the available labor force and to rebuild the reserve
army of labor, the organic composition of capital must rise. The rising organic
composition of capital requires the substitution of machines and other means of
production for labor power. Marx (1967: 364) said: “the implements of labour, in the
form of machinery, necessitate the substitution of natural forces for human force …”
With rising organic composition of capital, the consumption of energy and other
material resources tends to grow more rapidly than the population.
Moreover, as capitalist production expands, for the surplus value to be realized, the
populations’ consumption must expand accordingly.
1
Consumption has become
Strictly speaking, the organic composition of capital refers to the ratio of the value of the means of
production employed to the value of labor power and the technical composition of capital refers to the
physical ratio of the means of production to labor power.
For simplicity, this paper makes no
distinction between the two definitions of composition of capital. For the organic and technical
composition of capital and implications for capitalist accumulation, see Marx (1967: 574-606).
2
increasingly “capital intensive” and requires the use of growing amounts of energy
and other resources.
In the core states of the capitalist world system (or the “advanced capitalist states”),
the so-called “services” account for more than two-thirds of the GDP. Some argue
that as the economy moves towards “services” or “information” sectors, capitalism
becomes increasingly “dematerialized” and dematerialization would allow capital
accumulation to take place without rising consumption of material resources. In fact,
some services such as transportation is closely related to material production and is
highly energy-intensive. Other services, such as wholesale and retail, finance and
insurance, government, education, and health care are non-productive sectors that do
not generate surplus value by themselves.
From the Marxist perspective, their
“incomes” result from redistribution of the surplus value generated in the material
production sectors.2
The so-called dematerialization in the core states to a large extent reflects the relocation of production capital to the periphery and semi-periphery and the
redistribution of the global surplus value from the periphery and semi-periphery to the
core. This type of dematerialization cannot be reproduced on a global scale.
Therefore, capitalist accumulation inevitably leads to rising consumption of energy
and other resources. The global capitalist economy currently depends heavily on nonrenewable resources for energy and raw materials. This is clearly unsustainable.
2
Publicly run education and health care do not produce surplus value for the capitalists (though they
certainly create conditions for the reproduction of labor force that is essential for capitalism) and are
“non-productive” in the capitalist sense.
Education and health care institutions run by private
capitalists do generate surplus value though their operations depend on material inputs such as
buildings and equipment produced in the material production sectors.
3
Recycling and substitution of non-renewable resources by renewable resources help to
slow down the depletion of non-renewable resources. However, recycling of nonrenewable resources can never be complete, in many areas renewable resources
cannot substitute for non-renewable resources (for example, in most cases metal
products or plastics cannot be replaced by raw materials produced from agriculture),
and the use of renewable resources is limited by the eco-system’s regenerative
capacity.
Moreover, the use of both non-renewable and renewable resources
inevitably generate wastes and have environmental impacts, but the eco-system’s
ability to assimilate the wastes generated by the human economy is limited
(Hueseman 2003).
The endless pursuit of profit and accumulation is inherently unsustainable and will
sooner or later lead to a general environmental crisis. Attempts to provide technical
solutions to the environmental problems are subject to the limit of basic physical laws
(such as the Second Law of Thermodynamics) and any technical gains in “ecoefficiency” (reduction of environmental impact per unit of output) would soon be
overwhelmed by relentless capital accumulation.
Environmental problems represent social costs that are not taken into account by
capitalists’ private calculations. Individual capitalists are not motivated to clean the
environment or develop alternative resources. This problem of “externality” can be
somewhat alleviated by government regulations within nation states.
However,
capitalism is a global system but there is not a world government that can effectively
represent the collective interest of the global capitalists as a whole.
Instead,
individual capitalist states are motivated primarily to maximize their national rates of
accumulation to prevail in global competition. There is no effective mechanism to
regulate the global environment.
Even if some international agreements can be
reached on certain environmental issues, there would be strong incentives for
individual states to “cheat” or simply ignore the agreements.
4
China and the Global Energy Crisis
At the current trend, in a few years China will replace US to become the world’s
largest economy (measured at purchasing power parity). China’s rapid economic
growth has led to rapid increase in demand for energy and other resources. Between
1980 and 2000, China’s energy consumption grew at an average annual rate of 3.9
percent.
Since 2000, however, China’s energy consumption has grown at 10.9
percent a year (Cui 2006: 97-99).
China already accounts for about 15 percent of the world’s energy consumption. At
the current rate, China will account for about 30 percent of the world’s energy
consumption in 10 years, and more than half of the world’s energy consumption in 20
years.
This is clearly impossible!
Moreover, China’s rapid growth in energy
consumption has greatly accelerated the depletion of fossil fuels and other nonrenewable resources, and may soon precipitate a global energy crisis.
Fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal) provide 80 percent of the world’s energy
supply (IEA 2006). About a quarter of the energy supply from fossil fuels is used for
electricity generation, and another 10 percent is used by services and household
sectors (for space heating, cooking, etc.).
In principle (though with practical
difficulties), fossil fuels used for electricity generation can be replaced by nuclear or
renewable energy sources. Energy use in services and household sectors may be
provided by electricity generated by nuclear or renewable sources. However, in other
areas, fossil fuels cannot be substituted by electricity, and are indispensable for the
operations of the global capitalist economy.
Oil is essential for the transportation system based on cars and trucks. Electric cars or
fuel cells made from hydrogen have serious limitations and cannot realistically
5
replace oil on any large scale.3 While the rail system could be operated with electric
trains, inter-continental long-distance transportation by air and by ocean (with the
possible exception of some very expensive, nuclear-powered ships) completely
depends on oil. Without inter-continental long-distance transportation, the entire
global capitalist economy based on the worldwide division of labor and trade would
collapse.
Oil provides an indispensable fuel for heavy equipment used in agriculture, mining,
and construction. Oil, natural gas, and coal are essential inputs for the production of
fertilizers, plastics, and other chemicals (Heinberg 2006: 4-7).
Many high-
temperature, high-pressure industrial processes depend on coal and natural gas. Coal
is used as fuel and an essential input for about two-thirds of the world’s steel
production (Australian Coal Association 2007). Without fossil fuels, not only that the
world economy will lose a major source of energy supply, but much of the modern
industry and agriculture will cease to function.
Fossil fuels are non-renewable resources and will inevitably be depleted with endless
capital accumulation and consumption of resources. There is growing consensus that
the world’s oil production is likely to peak soon and start to decline irreversibly.
Heinberg (2006: 23) summarizes the studies on peak oil dates, which range from now
to 2030. Most independent studies predict a peak oil date before 2015, and those who
predict a date after 2015 are institutions related to the oil industry or the US
government. Campbell (2005: 209-216) expects the world natural gas production to
peak by 2025, staying on a high plateau until 2045, and then decline precipitously.
Laherrere (2004) predicts that the world natural gas production will peak around 2030.
3
On limitations of electric cars and hydrogen, see Heinberg (2003: 146-149); Trainer (2004: Chapter
6); and Kunstler (2005: 110-116; 125-126).
6
The conventional wisdom is that the world’s coal reserves are relatively abundant and
will last about 150 years at the current production rate. However, a recent study by
the German Energy Watch Group (2007) finds that the world’s coal production is
likely to peak around 2025. Another study by the Institute for Energy based in
Netherlands concludes that the world reserves of economically recoverable coal are
decreasing fast and coal production costs are steadily rising all over the world.4
Nuclear energy and most of the renewable energy sources can only generate
electricity. Biomass is the only renewable source that can be used as substitutes for
fossil fuels in the making of liquid or gaseous fuels, and various chemical products.
But the potential of biomass is limited by the available quantity of productive land. It
is already difficult for the world agriculture to meet the rising demand for food from
the growing population (to be discussed in the next section). There is little additional
land available to grow energy crops. Trainer (2004: Chapter 5) estimates that if 600
million hectares or about 40 percent of the world’s total cropland is used to grow
biomass, it can produce just enough liquid fuel to replace about 20 percent of the
world’s current oil consumption.
The large-scale production of biomass is ecologically destructive and unsustainable.
It requires large amounts of chemical fertilizers and water, and causes serious soil
erosion. To grow biomass, agribusinesses have converted forests, range, and wetland
into cropland, destroying rainforests, leading to water pollution and water depletion,
reducing biodiversity, and contributing to global warming. As both the growing of
biomass and the conversion of biomass into useful fuel require large amounts of
energy, biomass has low energy returns and some, such as ethanol made from corn,
may have negative energy returns, that is, it takes more energy to make the ethanol
than is contained in the ethanol (Heinberg 2006: 93-98; Friedemann 2007).
4
The study has not yet been published. For a summary of the study’s findings, see Heinburg (2007).
7
Nuclear energy is based on non-renewable resources. Breeder reactors have serious
safety, security, and pollution problems (Trainer 2004: Chapter 9). Nuclear fusion
still needs to overcome some serious technical obstacles, will not be practical for at
least several decades, and will be very expensive even when it becomes technically
feasible (Trainer 2004: Chapter 9; Crooks 2006). Conventional nuclear fission burner
reactors use uranium, which is a limited resource. According to the Energy Watch
Group (2006), the world’s proved uranium reserves will be exhausted in 30 years at
the current rate of consumption and all possible resources of uranium will be
exhausted in 70 years. The expansion of nuclear energy is further limited by the slow
pace of building new nuclear reactors.
Solar and wind electricity require the use of large amounts of land and are unlikely to
provide more than a fraction of the world’s future energy supply due to the constraints
of available land. Solar and wind are variable and intermittent sources of energy and
cannot serve as the basic or base-load source of electricity. It is estimated that solar
and wind electricity may have a peak capacity up to 20 percent of the installed baseload electricity capacity or supply up to 10 percent of the total electricity production
(Lightfoot and Green 2002). The large-scale use of solar and wind electricity could
also have serious environmental impacts (Heusemann 2003).
Moreover, the
production of the equipment required for solar and wind electricity generation as well
as the construction of the necessary infrastructure depends on fossil fuels and other
non-renewable resources (Kunstler 2005: 121-131).
Hydropower is limited by the available sites and has serious environmental problems
(Heinberg 2003: 149-150; Kunstler 2005: 119-121). Other renewable sources, such
as tide, wave, and geothermal, are unlikely to make a large worldwide contribution
(Heinberg 2003: 151-154; Hayden 2004: 209-212; Trainer 2006).
8
Figure 1 projects the world’s energy supply over the course of this century. Some of
the key assumptions are: the world’s oil production peaks in 2010; natural gas
production peaks in 2025; coal production peaks in 2025; nuclear electricity peaks in
2050; biomass uses up to 40 percent of the world’s cropland; intermittent sources of
electricity (solar and wind) generate up to 20 percent of the world’s total electricity
production.
Despite substantial increases in the energy supply from renewable
sources, the world’s total energy supply peaks in 2025 and declines thereafter.
Between 1960 and 2004, the world’s energy efficiency (economic output per unit of
energy use) increased at an average annual rate of 0.9 percent. Since the first oil crisis,
there has been some acceleration in efficiency improvement. Between 1973 and 2004,
the world’s energy efficiency improved at an average annual rate of 1.3 percent.
Lightfoot and Green (2001) conducted a sector by sector study of the long-term
technical potential of energy efficiency improvement in the world economy, and
concluded that the maximum potential energy efficiency is between 250 percent and
330 percent of the world average energy efficiency in 1990. Assuming all of the
efficiency improvement potential is to be realized before 2100, then the average
annual growth rate of energy efficiency between 1990 and 2100 would be between 0.8
percent and 1.1 percent. This paper assumes that the energy efficiency in the world
economy improves at an annual rate of 1.5 percent.
China depends on coal for about 70 percent of the energy consumption. The Energy
Watch Group (2007) points out that China’s coal production could peak around 2015
and declines rapidly after the peak. Figure 2 projects the growth of per capita GDP in
China and the rest of the world based on the assumption that coal production in China
will peak in 2015 and China’s imports of energy will rise to 10 percent of the world’s
total fuel consumption (consumption of oil, natural gas, coal, and biomass as fuel, not
including their use for electricity generation). China’s energy efficiency is assumed
to grow 1.7 percent a year and the rest of the world’s GDP is simply calculated as the
9
difference between the word’s GDP and China’s GDP. Population projections are
based on United Nations (2007).
If China manages to maintain rapid economic growth after the world oil production
peak with rising energy imports, the rest of the world will have to suffer years of
economic disaster. After 2015, with the decline of coal production, the Chinese
economy will collapse and suffer from irreversible decline after 2030. In short, the
global energy crisis will translate into a prolonged world economic depression.
However, energy crisis is just one among many aspects of the global environmental
crisis that the world will have to confront in the coming decades.
China and the Global Food Crisis
Over the second half of the 20th Century, the world experienced rapid increases in
food production and population. The “success” of modern agriculture depends on
mechanization, chemical inputs (such as fertilizers and pesticides), irrigation, and
high-yield seeds (that are responsive to chemical fertilizers and irrigation). Modern
agriculture is therefore built upon cheap oil and natural gas. About ten calories of
energy are required to deliver just one calorie of food to the consumer in an advanced
capitalist country (Pfeiffer 2006: 19-27).
However, all elements of modern agriculture are now suffering from diminishing
returns. Mechanized tillage, use of chemical fertilizers, and large-scale monoculture
contribute to soil erosion.
Pests are developing generic resistance to pesticides.
Perennial irrigation leads to waterlogging and salinization and depletes aquifers. Due
to land degradation and the growth of cities, the world’s total area of arable land has
peaked and is now declining.
The “solutions” that capitalist corporations and
governments are trying to provide, such as genetically modified crops, threaten to
bring about ecological disasters (Goldsmith 2005; Pfeiffer 2006; Heinberg 2006: 4954).
10
The world per capita grain production peaked in 1984 (Figure 3).5 Under the current
trend, the world’s per capita grain production would fall to between 200 and 250
kilograms a year by the second half of the 21st Century. These are levels that could
lead to worldwide starvation. Separately, due to persistent over-fishing, the world’s
fish stocks are expected to collapse before 2050, making fishing impossible and
depriving the world’s population of a major source of protein (Harvey 2006).
As soil erosion, land degradation, depletion of aquifers, and loss of biodiversity
develop, at some point, the world food production could collapse, declining rapidly
and irreversibly. Given the dependence of modern agriculture on fossil fuels, the
coming peak of the world oil and natural gas production could be the trigger that
starts the collapse. Food is the basis of survival and civilization, a general collapse of
the world food production would make the depression scenarios projected in Figure 1
and 2 appear to be “optimistic.”
Between the late 1950s and the 1970s, the Chinese agriculture was organized
according to socialist principles. Land and the basic means of production were owned
collectively by local communities (organized in “people’s communes”), income was
shared more or less equally, and agricultural production was incorporated into
national planning. After serious initial failures, collective agriculture led to steady
increases in production and built the physical and social infrastructure required for
sustainable improvement in quality of life. The commune system was particularly
effective in meeting the population’s basic needs with limited material resources. By
the late 1970s, China’s health and education indicators were better than many middleincome countries (Wen and Li 2006).
5
Data for world grain production from 1950 to 2006 are from Earth Policy Institute (2007).
11
In the early 1980s, China’s agriculture was in effect privatized. Initially, agricultural
production grew rapidly as the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides surged. But
as the use of chemical inputs suffered diminishing returns and the physical
infrastructure built in the collective era was left to deteriorate, food production started
to stagnate. Per capita grain production peaked in 1996 (Figure 4).
Global warming could prove to be particularly devastating to China’s environment
and agriculture. Water scarcity and extreme weather could reduce China’s crop
production by 10 percent by 2030, and by up to 37 percent after 2050 (ASPO USA
2007).
China and the Global Climate Change
The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report provides decisive
evidence that human activities (fossil fuel use and agriculture) have led to rising
global atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases and contributed to global
warming (IPCC 2007a).
Under the current trend, the global average temperature would rise by between 1.1
and 6.4 degrees Celsius over this century, leading to floods, droughts, falling
agricultural productivity, rising sea levels, and massive extinction of species. If the
global average temperature were to rise by more than 2 degrees within this century or
more than 3 degrees above the pre-industrial level, the earth’s eco-systems could start
to collapse.
The oceans and the terrestrial biosphere would become net carbon
sources, causing unstoppable global warming. James Lovelock, the world’s leading
earth system scientist, told the reporter that most of the world would become scrub
and desert and most of the oceans would be denuded of life, and a massive die-off
could reduce the world population by more than 80 percent (IPCC 2007a and 2007b;
Leake 2007).
12
To prevent the global temperature from rising by more than 3 degrees above the preindustrial level, global atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide should stabilize at
about 450 ppm (parts per million).
For this to be achieved, global cumulative
emissions of carbon dioxide over the 21st Century should be no more than 2460
billion tons if no climate carbon cycle feedback effects are taken into account or no
more than 1800 billion tons if feedback effects are taken into account. As carbon
dioxide emissions associated with land use are about 6 billion tons a year, this implies
that the cumulative carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels over the 21st Century
must be no more than 1200-1860 billion tons (IPCC 2007a and 2007c).
The world is now emitting carbon dioxide from fossil fuels at an annual rate of 27
billion tons (implying total emissions of 2700 billion tons over the course of a
century). Currently, the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide is rising at more
than 2 ppm a year. At this rate, the critical limit of 450 ppm will be breached in 35
years.
In 2004, China emitted 4.7 billion tons of carbon dioxide, or 18 percent of the world’s
total emissions. Between 2000 and 2004, China’s carbon dioxide emissions grew at
an average annual rate of 14 percent and China is expected to overtake the US in 2007
or 2008 to become the world’s largest carbon dioxide emitter (“Carbon Emissions to
Rise 59 Per Cent,” Financial Times, May 22, 2007, p. 2). If China’s emissions were
to grow 10 percent a year, then by 2020 China alone would emit about twice as much
as all of the advanced capitalist countries combined.
The Kyoto Protocol designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in advanced
capitalist countries has largely failed. New global efforts to address global warming
have to face considerable obstacles. The world’s largest emitters, such as the US,
China, and India are particularly unenthusiastic. At this point, it is not even clear
whether a new climate treaty will replace the Kyoto Protocol in time. Even if some
13
international agreement can be reached, the goals that could be agreed upon by all the
major national governments might turn out to be too little, too late, and there will be
no guarantee that even a watered down agreement can be effectively and adequately
implemented.
The “good” news is that with the depletion of fossil fuels, the world’s capitalist
economies will be forced to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
Based on the
assumptions used to project the world energy supply in Figure 1, if the world’s
production of fossil fuels were to peak in the coming one or two decades, then over
the course of this century, the cumulative consumption of coal, oil, and natural gas
would be 288.7, 180.9, and 183.3 billion tons of oil equivalent respectively.
According to IEA (2006), each ton (of oil equivalent) of coal emits 3.83 tons of
carbon dioxide, each ton of oil emits 2.80 tons, and each ton of natural gas emits 2.28
tons. Based on these rates, the total emissions of carbon dioxide over the course of
this century would amount to 2030 billion tons, or several hundred billion tons more
than what would be required to prevent catastrophic global warming.
Thus, to
prevent climate catastrophe, even more drastic cuts in world energy consumption than
is suggested in Figure 1 will be required.
Latest evidence suggests that the earth’s self-regulating system might already start to
fail. The Southern Ocean, which is the world’s biggest carbon sink (accounting for 15
percent of the carbon absorption potential), has become effectively saturated. This
new finding suggests that both the atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and the global
temperature are likely to rise faster than is previously anticipated, making it much
more difficult to stabilize the global climate (McCarthy 2007).
Centuries of relentless capitalist accumulation have set the humanity on the course of
total self-destruction. The very survival of the humanity and civilization is at stake.
14
There is no possibility that the crisis can be avoided or overcome within the historical
framework of capitalism.
To rebuild the human society on an ecologically sustainable basis, there must be an
economic system that is based on the production for use, to meet people’s basic needs,
rather than one that is oriented towards endless pursuit of profit and accumulation. If
some of the productive forces achieved in the capitalist era are to be preserved, an
economic system based on production for use has to be some form of socialist
planned economy. However, the historical lessons of the 20th Century suggest that
planning limited at local or national levels will be inadequate. To overcome the
global environmental crisis and save the humanity, resources have to be re-allocated
with rational planning on a global scale. To accomplish this, there must be a world
socialist planned economy based on the international solidarity of all the working
people.
15
Bibliography
ASPO USA. 2007. China Says Global Warming Threatens Development. Peak Oil
News, April 23, 2007. Website: http://www.aspo-usa.com.
Australian Coal Association. 2007. The Use of Coal – Overview. Website:
http://www.australiancoal.com.au/uses.htm.
Campbell, Colin J. 2005. Oil Crisis. Brentwood, Essex, UK: Multi-Science
Publishing Company Ltd.
Cui Minxuan (ed.). 2006. 2006 Zhongguo Nengyuan Fazhan Baogao (The Energy
Development Report of China 2006). Beijing: Shehui Kexue Wenxian
Chubanshe (Social Sciences Academic Press).
Crooks, Ed. 2006. Fusion Reactor: Ten-Year Quest for Safe Nuclear Power Launched.
Financial Times, November 22, 2006, p. 2.
Earth Policy Institute. 2007. Grain Harvest Indicator. Website:
http://www.earth-policy.org/Indicators/Grain/index.htm.
Energy Watch Group. 2006. Uranium Resources and Nuclear Energy. EWG-Series
No. 1/2006, December 2006. Website: http://www.energywatchgroup.org.
____. 2007. Coal: Resources and Future Production. EWG-Series No. 1/2007, March
2007. Website: http://www.energywatchgroup.org.
Friedemann, Alice. Peak Soil: Why Cellulosic Ethanol, Biofuels Are Unsustainable
and a Threat to America. Cultural Change, April 10, 2007. Reprinted by
ASPO USA, Peak Oil News, April 15, 2007. Website:
http://www.aspo-usa.com.
Goldsmith, Edward R.D. 2005. Farming and Food Production under Regimes of
Climate Change. In Andrew McKillop with Sheila Newman (eds.), The Final
Energy Crisis, pp. 56-73. London: Pluto Press.
Harvey, Fiona. 2006. Scientists Warn of Fish Stocks Collapse. Financial Times,
November 3, 2006, p. 7.
Hayden, Howard C. 2004. The Solar Fraud: Why Solar Energy Won’t Run the World.
Pueblo West, CO: Vales Lake Publishing, LLC.
16
Heinberg, Richard. 2003. The Party’s Over: Oil, War and the Fate of Industrial
Societies. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
____. 2006. The Oil Depletion Protocol: A Plan to Avert Oil Wars, Terrorism and
Economic Collapse. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
____. 2007. Peak Coal: Sooner Than You Think. Website:
http://www.energybulletin.net/29919.html.
Huesemann, Michael H. 2003. The Limits of Technological Solutions to Sustainable
Development. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy 5: 21-34
(published online December 14, 2002).
IEA. International Energy Agency. 2006. Key World Energy Statistics. Website:
http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2006/key2006.pdf.
IPCC. 2007a. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (Summary for Policy
Makers). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Website:
http://www.ipcc.ch.
____. 2007b. Climate Change 2007: Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and
Vulnerability (Summary for Policy Makers). Working Group II Contribution
to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report.
Website: http://www.ipcc.ch.
____. 2007c. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change (Summary for
Policy Makers). Working Group III Contribution to the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. Website:
http://www.ipcc.ch.
Kunstler, James Howard. 2005. The Long Emergency: Surviving the Converging
Catastrophes of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
Laherrere, Jean. 2004. Future of Natural Gas Supply. Contribution to the Third
International Workshop on Oil & Gas Depletion, Berlin, Germany, May 24-25,
2004. Website: http://www.hubbertpeak.com/laherrere/IIASA2004.pdf.
17
Leake, Jonathan. 2007. Fiddling with Figures while the Earth Burns: The Latest
Initiatives to Stop Global Warming Won’t Save Us, James Lovelock Tells
Jonathan Leake. Times Online, May 4, 2007. Website:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article/1751509.ece.
Lightfoot, H. Douglas and Christopher Green. 2001. Energy Efficiency Decline
Implications for Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Content. Centre for Climate
and Global Change Research, Report No. 2001-7, McGill University,
Montreal, Canada. Website:
http://www.mcgill.ca/ccgcr.
___. 2002. An Assessment of IPCC Working Group III Findings in Climate Change
2001: Mitigation of the Potential Contribution of Renewable Energies to
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Stabilization. Centre for Climate and Global
Change Research, Report No. 2002-5, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Website:
http://www.mcgill.ca/ccgcr.
Marx, Karl. 1967. Capital, volume 1. New York: International Publishers.
McCarthy, Michael. 2007. Earth’s Natural Defenses against Climate Change
‘Beginning to Fail.’ May 18, 2007. Website:
http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/052107EC.shtml.
Pfeiffer, Dale Allen 2006. Eating Fossil Fuels: Oil, Food and the Coming Crisis in
Agriculture. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
Trainer, Ted. 2004. Renewable Energy; Can’t Save Consumer Society, Can Fuel
Sustainable Society. Website:
http://www.arts.unsw.edu.au/tsw/D86RE.Ch1.INTRO.html (a book based on
this document is to be published soon and the author has removed the original
document at the request of the publisher).
____. 2006. Renewable Energy – Can’t Save Consumer Society. Website:
http://socialwork.arts.unsw.edu.au/tsw/D100.RE.cant.save.25.7.o6.html.
18
United Nations. 2007. World Population Prospects:The 2006 Revision. New York:
United Nations.
Wen, Dale and Minqi Li. 2006. China: Hyper-Development and Environmental Crisis.
In Leo Panitch and Colin Leys (eds.), Socialist Register 2007: Coming to
Terms with Nature, pp. 130-146. New York: Monthly Review Press.
19
Figure 1
World Primary Energy Supply: 2000-2100
(Million tons of oil equivalnent)
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
Coal
Oil
Natural Gas
Nuclear
Hydro
Biomass
2100
2090
2080
2070
2060
2050
2040
2030
2020
2010
2000
0
Other
20
Figure 2
Per Capita GDP: Annual Growth Rates
(Historical and Projected, 2001-2050)
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
China
2050
2045
2040
2035
2030
2025
2020
2015
2010
2005
2000
-0.02
Rest of the World
21
Figure 3
World's Grain Production
(Historical and Trend, 1950-2100)
2500
350
Total (million tons, left scale)
Peak Trend (kg)
2100
2080
2090
2070
2060
2050
100
2040
0
2030
150
2020
500
2010
200
2000
1000
1990
250
1980
1500
1960
1970
300
1950
2000
Per Person (kg)
Trough Trend (kg)
22
Figure 4
China's Grain Production
(Historical and Trend, 1950-2100)
600
450
Total (million tons, left scale)
Peak Trend (kg)
2100
2090
2080
150
2070
0
2060
200
2050
100
2040
250
2020
2030
200
2010
300
2000
300
1990
350
1970
1980
400
1960
400
1950
500
Per Person (kg)
Trough Trend (kg)
23