Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Flixborough disaster wikipedia , lookup
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant wikipedia , lookup
Geometric design of roads wikipedia , lookup
Geotechnical engineering wikipedia , lookup
Landslide mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Seismic communication wikipedia , lookup
Slope stability analysis wikipedia , lookup
Earthquake engineering wikipedia , lookup
PROBABILISTIC SIMPLIFIED SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF EARTH SLOPES AND STRUCTURES Jorge Macedo, Jonathan Bray & Norman Abrahamson Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA Thaleia Travasarou Fugro Consultants Inc., Oakland, CA, USA ABSTRACT Recently developed probabilistic simplified procedures to assess the seismic performance of earth structures and natural slopes are presented. Seismic slope performance is assessed using the frameworks of a Newmark-based method to estimate the likely amount of seismic displacement and a pseudostatic slope stability procedure that estimates a seismic pseudostatic coefficient that is dependent on key factors, including the seismic hazard. The proposed procedures are applied to two sites in the United States. Under the first framework, the seismic performance assessment is based on the estimation of the displacement hazard curve which provides the mean annual rate of exceedance of the seismic slope displacement. A methodology is proposed and implemented for the estimation of the displacement hazard curve. The seismic slope displacement estimates calculated with the recently developed fully probabilistic procedures are compared with the results from partially probabilistic methods (e.g., Bray and Travasarou, 2007). Currently employed procedures, such as Bray and Travasarou (2007), do not provide consistently conservative or unconservative assessments of the seismic slope displacement hazard. The comparison of the results of the fully and partially probabilistic simplified seismic slope displacement procedures depends on several factors and in particular on the seismotectonic setting (e.g., shallow crustal earthquakes vs. subduction zone earthquakes). The fully probabilistic approach is preferred, because it is more rigorous than a partially probabilistic approach. Under the second framework, the seismic coefficient used in a pseudostatic slope stability analyses should be a function of the dynamic properties of the earth system or natural slope, the seismic ground motion characteristics at the site of a specific project, and the allowable level of seismic displacement (e.g., Bray and Travasarou 2009). Thus, a methodology for a fully probabilistic based estimation of the seismic coefficient that depends on these factors was developed. Comparisons of the results of the partially probabilistic procedure proposed by Bray and Travasarou (2009) show consistent results for the seismic coefficient estimated with the new fully probabilistic procedure. However, the new fully probabilistic procedure enables the engineer to address directly the target design level and associated uncertainties. The fully probabilistic seismic slope displacement procedures developed in this study have been implemented as Visual Basic applications (VBA) in an Excel spreadsheet. The procedures were developed for a wide range of earth structures and natural slopes for shallow crustal earthquakes and subduction zone earthquakes. They can be readily used in practice to perform rigorous fully probabilistic performance-based seismic slope stability hazard assessments. .