Download Axion thermalization in the early universe

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Density matrix wikipedia , lookup

Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup

ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup

Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup

ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Cosmic microwave background wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup

Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Strangeness production wikipedia , lookup

Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PHYSICAL REVIEW D 66, 023004 共2002兲
Axion thermalization in the early universe
Eduard Massó,* Francesc Rota,† and Gabriel Zsembinszki‡
Grup de Fı́sica Teòrica and Institut de Fı́sica d’Altes Energies, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
共Received 30 April 2002; published 16 July 2002兲
We reanalyze the conditions under which we have a primordial thermal population of axions. We extend a
previous study and take into account processes involving gluons and quarks. We conclude that if the PecceiQuinn scale satisfies F a ⬍1.2⫻1012 GeV there is thermal axion production. In this case, a period in the early
universe exists where axions would interact with the QCD plasma and we point out that nonthermal axions
produced before the end of this period would thermalize.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.023004
PACS number共s兲: 95.30.Cq, 14.80.Mz, 98.80.Cq
I. INTRODUCTION
The Peccei-Quinn solution 关1兴 to the strong C P problem
introduces a new U(1) PQ chiral symmetry, the spontaneous
breaking of which leads to a new spinless particle, the axion
关2兴. If it exists, the axion has quite well defined properties: its
mass and couplings are inversely proportional to F a , the
energy scale of the U(1) PQ breaking. We will be particularly
concerned with the coupling of the axion field a to gluons
Lgga ⫽
1 ␣ s b␮␯ b
G G̃ ␮ ␯ a
Fa 8␲
共1兲
where ␣ s ⫽g s2 /(4 ␲ ) with g s the gauge coupling of color
SU(3) c . In Eq. 共1兲,
1
G̃ ␮b ␯ ⫽ ⑀ ␮ ␯␳␴ G b ␳␴
2
共2兲
is the dual of the gluon field G ␮b ␯ , and there is a sum over the
color index b.
Much theoretical study and experimental effort have been
devoted to this particle 共for recent reviews see 关3兴兲. The laboratory, astrophysical, and cosmological constraints imply that
F a must be a high energy scale, at least as large as 关4兴
F a ⬎6⫻108 GeV
共3兲
symmetry breaks down at a temperature T⯝F a , the vacuum
angle has no preferred value; but when the temperature
reaches T⯝⌳ QCD , the vacuum angle sets where the vacuum
energy is minimized, which is the C P-conserving value. Relaxation from one angle to the other produces a coherent,
cold condensate of axions. This is the ‘‘misalignment mechanism.’’ On the other hand, the U(1) PQ breaking at T⯝F a
originates axion strings. If inflation takes place just after that,
these strings dilute away. However, if this is not the case, we
have a second mechanism of production of axions when
strings decay. Also, if the axion field is not homogeneized by
inflation, there are models where axion domain walls appear
soon after T⯝⌳ QCD . The decay of these walls into axions is
a third mechanism of non-thermal primordial axions.
Thermal production of axions was studied by Turner 关8兴.
His main interest was to study the possibility that thermal
axions have a density greater than the corresponding nonthermal axions, and then to analyze the potential detection of
photons from axion decay. Turner considered the Primakoff
process, a⫹q ␥ ⫹q, where q is a light quark, and photoproduction, a⫹Q ␥ ⫹Q, where Q is a heavy quark, and
showed that when
F a ⬍109 GeV
axions were once in thermal equilibrium. Evaluating the axion density he found that for
which in turn implies
F a ⬍4⫻108 GeV
m a ⬍0.01 eV.
共4兲
Thus, the axion has to be a very light particle and very
weakly coupled.
One of the most attractive features of the axion is that it
may be one of the constituents of the dark matter. Indeed,
axions are copiously produced in the early universe. These
primordial axions are generated mainly non-thermally. We
know three non-thermal sources at work in the evolution of
the universe: the ‘‘misalignment mechanism’’ 关5兴, string decay 关6兴 and domain wall decay 关7兴. When the Peccei-Quinn
*Email address: [email protected]
†
‡
Email address: [email protected]
Email address: [email protected]
0556-2821/2002/66共2兲/023004共5兲/$20.00
共5兲
共6兲
the thermal population is greater than the non-thermal.
In 关8兴, it was mentioned that other axion processes contribute to axion thermalization and consequently would increase the value in Eq. 共5兲. However, these other processes
were not evaluated since the range 共5兲 includes 共6兲 and this
was enough for the purposes of 关8兴. We note that the experimental bound in Eq. 共3兲 excludes the range in Eq. 共6兲 and
leaves a small interval of the condition 共5兲.
In this paper we extend the work of 关8兴 and investigate the
contribution to axion thermalization of other processes than
Primakoff and photoproduction. As we will show, the processes we discuss lead to a much larger range for F a than Eq.
共5兲.
The reactions we consider all involve the gga vertex appearing in Eq. 共1兲,
66 023004-1
©2002 The American Physical Society
PHYSICAL REVIEW D 66, 023004 共2002兲
EDUARD MASSÓ, FRANCESC ROTA, AND GABRIEL ZSEMBINSZKI
FIG. 1. Feynman diagram for the process a⫹gq⫹q̄.
共1兲 a⫹gq⫹q̄
共2兲 a⫹qg⫹q and a⫹q̄g⫹q̄
共3兲 a⫹gg⫹g.
We show the corresponding Feynman diagrams in Figs. 1,
2, and 3.
The coupling of the axion to gluons 共1兲 is an essential
ingredient of the effective theory once the Peccei-Quinn
symmetry is broken, since it reproduces the chiral anomaly
of the theory. In this sense our results are model independent
in contrast with the result 共5兲 arising from Primakoff and
photoproduction processes that involve the a ␥␥ coupling
which is model dependent and might be small in some models.
FIG. 3. Feynman diagrams for the process a⫹gg⫹g.
Here, ⌫ is the thermal averaged interaction rate for the process a⫹i1⫹2
⌫⬅
II. EVOLUTION OF THE AXION DENSITY
˜␴ v 2E a 2E i ⬅
In the cooling of the universe, as soon as the temperature
T⯝F a is reached, massless axions can be produced by
means of reactions 共1兲, 共2兲, and 共3兲. The production rate has
to compete with the expansion of the universe, characterized
by the Hubble expansion rate,
H⫽
冑
4␲3
T2
冑g
.
* M Planck
45
共7兲
We will assume that, in the range of temperatures where
we will apply the evolution equation for interating axions,
the particle content corresponds to SU(3) c ⫻SU(2) L
⫻U(1) Y , with three families and one Higgs boson, with all
particles at the same temperature. Then, the relativistic degrees of freedom appearing in Eq. 共7兲 are given by 关9兴
7
g ⫽g boson ⫹ g f ermion ⫽106.75.
*
8
共8兲
n eq
a
冕
d p̃ a d p̃ i eq eq
f f • 共 ˜␴ v 2E a 2E i 兲
2E a 2E i a i
冕
d p̃ 1 d p̃ 2
共 2 ␲ 兲 4 ␦ 4 共 p 1 ⫹ p 2 ⫺p a ⫺p i 兲
2E 1 2E 2
⫻
兺 兩M 兩2
共9兲
共10兲
共11兲
with d p̃⬅d 3 p/(2 ␲ ) 3 . The phase space occupancy in kinetic
equilibrium f eq is given by the Fermi-Dirac or Bose-Einstein
distributions,
f eq ⫽
1
e
(E⫺ ␮ )/T
⫾1
共12兲
where we will take the relativistic limit where the chemical
potential ␮ goes to zero. In Eq. 共11兲, 兩 M 兩 2 is summed over
all the degrees of freedom. The equilibrium densities appearing in Eq. 共10兲 are given by
n eq ⫽g
The behavior of the axion density n a is given in terms of
the Boltzmann equation 关8 –10兴,
dn a
⫹3Hn a ⫽⌫ 关 n eq
a ⫺n a 兴 .
dt
1
冕
d p̃ f eq
共13兲
where g is the degrees of freedom of the particle. In the
period of interest, thermal axions are massless and have a
density
n eq
a ⫽
␨共 3 兲
␲2
T3
共14兲
where ␨ (3)⫽1.20206 . . . is the Riemann zeta function of 3.
We follow the convenient procedure 关8 –10兴 of normalizing particle densities to the entropy density,
s⫽
FIG. 2. Feynman diagrams for the processes a⫹qg⫹q and
a⫹q̄g⫹q̄.
so that we define
023004-2
2␲2
g T 3 ⫽0.44⫻g S T 3
*
45 * S
共15兲
PHYSICAL REVIEW D 66, 023004 共2002兲
AXION THERMALIZATION IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE
Y⬅
na
.
s
共16兲
During the epoch in which we will apply the Boltzmann
equation 共9兲, we can use g S ⫽g ⫽ constant, and given by
*
*
Eq. 共8兲. Then we have that
Y eq ⫽
n eq
a
s
⫽
0.27
45␨ 共 3 兲 1
⫽
4 g
g
2␲
*
共17兲
*
is constant. We can write the Boltzmann equation 共9兲 as
x
dY ⌫ eq
⫽ 关 Y ⫺Y 兴
dx H
共18兲
When k satisfies this inequality, a thermal population of axions is born in the early universe. In the next section we
calculate ⌫, which, as we see from Eq. 共20兲, will give us the
clue of which is the corresponding range of F a .
III. CALCULATION OF THERMALLY AVERAGED
INTERACTION RATES
As expression 共11兲 is Lorentz invariant, we can evaluate it
in any reference system. For convenience, we choose the
center of mass system and will consider that all the particles
are massless because we are at very high energies. So, we
will write Eq. 共10兲 as
⌫⫽
where we have defined
x⬅
Fa
.
T
共19兲
We will now show that Eq. 共18兲 can be integrated in our
case. First, as we will see in Sec. III, ⌫⬀T 3 , so that ⌫/H
⬀1/x and we can define the constant
k⬅x
⌫
.
H
共20兲
Second, we use the fact that Y eq is independent of x. We
define
␩⬅
Y
Y eq
d␩
⫽k 共 1⫺ ␩ 兲
x2
dx
共22兲
Yd
Y eq
⫽ ␩ 共 x⫽k 兲 ⫽1⫺e k(1/k⫺1) ⬎0.95
N c ⫹N f /2 2
T ⫽8 ␲ ␣ s T 2
3
˜␴ CM ⫽A ln
冉 冊
s
2
mD
I ⫾⬅
1
␨共 3 兲
冕
L ⫾⬅
1
␨共 3 兲
冕
共24兲
共25兲
共26兲
共27兲
⫹B
共28兲
where A and B are constants, which for the considered processes have the numerical value
共1兲 A⫽0, B⫽N f /6␲ 2 ␣ s3 /F 2a .
共2兲 A⫽N f / ␲ 2 ␣ s3 /F 2a , B⫽⫺3N f /4␲ 2 ␣ s3 /F 2a .
共3兲 A⫽15/2␲ 2 ␣ s3 /F 2a , B⫽⫺55/8␲ 2 ␣ s3 /F 2a .
Setting Eq. 共28兲 in Eq. 共26兲 we find integrals of the type
which implies
k⬎4.
d p̃ a d p̃ i eq eq
f f • 共 2s ˜␴ CM 兲
2E a 2E i a i
where N c ⫽3 is the number of colors and N f ⫽6 is the number of flavors. We cut off the divergences using the Debye
mass. Cross sections have the form
共23兲
Since we start at x⫽1 (T⫽F a ) with no axions, in Eq. 共23兲
we have specified the initial condition ␩ (x⫽1)⫽0.
From the solution 共23兲 we see that ␩ starts to grow at x
⫽1. At x⫽k 共that is, ⌫⫽H) axions decouple from the QCD
plasma. We call Y d the value of Y at decoupling. For x⬎k
the value of ␩ remains constant, so we have Y ⫽Y d . We are
interested in the situation that axions have in practice a thermal spectrum, so we will ask that Y d differs from Y eq in less
than 5%,
冕
2
⫽g s2
mD
that has the solution
␩ 共 x 兲 ⫽1⫺e k(1/x⫺1) .
n eq
a
where ˜␴ CM is the usual total cross section in the center of
mass system, but with no average over the initial degrees of
freedom, and s is the Mandelstam invariant. From the Lagrangian piece 共1兲 one can easily find the Feynman rules for
the couplings between axions and gluons that appear in the
diagrams in Figs. 1, 2, and 3, which are necessary to calculate the cross sections for the considered processes. Some of
these cross sections diverge logarithmically in the t and u
channel. The processes we consider take place in a plasma
with vanishing global color and so color is effectively
⫺1
, with m D the QCD
screened for distances bigger than m D
Debye mass given by 关11兴
共21兲
and, finally, we write Eq. 共18兲 in the form
1
⬁
dx
0
⬁
0
dx
x2
e x ⫾1
x 2 ln x
e x ⫾1
that can be done analytically. We have
023004-3
共29兲
共30兲
PHYSICAL REVIEW D 66, 023004 共2002兲
EDUARD MASSÓ, FRANCESC ROTA, AND GABRIEL ZSEMBINSZKI
3
2
共31兲
I ⫺ ⫽2
共32兲
I ⫹⫽
L ⫹⫽
冉
1
␨ ⬘共 3 兲
9⫹ln 4⫺6 ␥ ⫹6
4
␨共 3 兲
L ⫺ ⫽3⫺2 ␥ ⫹2
冊
共33兲
␨ ⬘共 3 兲
␨共 3 兲
共34兲
where ␥ ⫽0.5772 . . . is the Euler’s gamma constant and
␨ ⬘ (3)⫽⫺0.1981 . . . . With these results, the integral 共26兲
gives
⌫⫽
T 3␨共 3 兲
共 2␲ 兲2
„兵 B⫺A 关 1/2⫹ln共 2 ␲ ␣ s 兲兴 其
⫻I ⫾ I ⫺ ⫹AL ⫾ I ⫺ ⫹AI ⫾ L ⫺ …
共35兲
where the sign ⫾ depends on whether the particle that goes
with the axion is a gluon (⫺) or a quark (⫹). Thus, for each
of the processes 共1兲, 共2兲, and 共3兲 we get, respectively,
⌫ 1 ⬅⌫ 共 a⫹gq⫹q̄ 兲 ⫽
␣ s3
F 2a
T 3N f
␨共 3 兲
共36兲
6␲4
⌫ 2 ⬅⌫ 共 a⫹qg⫹q 兲 ⫹⌫ 共 a⫹q̄g⫹q̄ 兲
⫽
␣ s3
F 2a
T 3 2N f
␨共 3 兲
4␲
4
冉
3
L ⫹⫹ L ⫺
4
3
15
⫺ ln共 2 ␲ ␣ s 兲 ⫺
2
8
共37兲
冊
⌫ 3 ⬅⌫ 共 a⫹gg⫹g 兲
⫽
␣ s3
15␨ 共 3 兲
Fa
2␲4
T3
2
冉
L ⫺ ⫺ln共 2 ␲ ␣ s 兲 ⫺
冊
17
.
12
共38兲
This is our main result. Models with F a satisfying Eq. 共41兲
have axions thermalizing in the early universe and we predict
that today there is a thermal population of axions.
We get a much higher value than the one in Eq. 共5兲. One
of the reasons is that the interaction rate 共39兲 increases as T 3
at high energies, while the rate coming from the photoproduction process considered in 关8兴 goes as T since the axion is
attached to the fermion line with the usual derivative coupling. The other reason is that color and flavor factors make
the interaction rate larger.
Our result in Eq. 共41兲 is in fact conservative. This is due
to the fact that the effective theory below the scale F a has
couplings of the axion to the electroweak gauge bosons
W ⫾ , W 0 , and B, similar to Eq. 共1兲. This generates processes
such as 共1兲, 共2兲, and 共3兲 with gluons replaced by appropiate
combinations of W ⫾ , W 0 , and B. These new processes contain in general quarks and also leptons. The form of the
couplings is fixed but their magnitude is model dependent
since it is different for different PQ-charge assignments to
the matter fields. Given this model dependence, we do not
include them in our analysis. They would lead to an increase
of the numerical value in Eq. 共39兲 by a factor of ⬃2 and
consequently would make the range of F a in Eq. 共41兲 larger
by the same amount.
Once we assume that axions thermalize, it is interesting to
know the density of this thermal axion population. After decoupling, axions redshift freely until today. Their density today, n a0 , can be calculated using the fact that after decoupling, the value of Y stays constant. We need the entropy
density today, s 0 , which has the contribution of photons, neutrinos and axions. Even in the case that axions are relativistic
today, the contribution to s 0 can be neglected since the axion
temperature is much colder than the cosmic microwave
background temperature, T 0 ⫽2.75 K. Indeed, since the time
of axion decoupling, the decoupling of other particles has
heated the photon bath but not the axion one. One gets that
the entropy density today corresponds to g S ⫽43/11⫽3.91
*
in Eq. 共15兲.
Then, we use Eqs. 共8兲, 共15兲, and 共17兲, to calculate the
axion number density today:
⌫ is the sum of all ⌫ i , and turns out to be
⌫⯝7.1⫻10⫺6
T3
F 2a
n a0 ⫽
共39兲
where we have introduced ␣ s ⯝1/35, corresponding to energies E⯝1012 GeV.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
Using Eqs. 共39兲, 共7兲 and the definition 共20兲 we have
GeV
Fa ⌫
.
k⫽
⯝5.0⫻1012
T H
Fa
F a ⬍1.2⫻1012 GeV.
共41兲
共42兲
This small density was also found by Turner 关8兴. At the view
of the small mass 共4兲 one can conclude that it is very unlikely that it can play a direct role in the efforts to detect
axions 关3兴.
It is also interesting to determine the range of temperatures where axions interact with the QCD plasma. For a
given F a satisfying Eq. 共41兲, it is not difficult to see that the
thermalization range is
F a ⲏTⲏ
共40兲
The inequality 共25兲 translates into
0.27
共 0.44⫻3.91T 30 兲 ⯝7.5 cm⫺3 .
106.75
F 2a
5⫻1012 GeV
.
共43兲
For example, for the highest possible value of F a where still
a thermal population arises, F a ⫽1.2⫻1012 GeV, we get a
temperature range
023004-4
PHYSICAL REVIEW D 66, 023004 共2002兲
AXION THERMALIZATION IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE
1.2⫻1012 GeVⲏTⲏ0.3⫻1012 GeV.
共44兲
For the lowest value of F a allowed by observation 关see Eq.
共3兲兴, the range is
6⫻108 GeVⲏTⲏ7⫻104 GeV.
共45兲
Our final comment refers to a related effect also happening in the thermalization period. If there are non-thermal
axions produced at this period, they would thermalize since
they would interact with the QCD plasma through reactions
共1兲, 共2兲 and 共3兲. Thus, no matter which was the energy spectrum and how high was the production rate of the originally
non-thermal axions, they would end up with the thermal
spectrum 共12兲 and density 共14兲. There is no effect on axions
from the misalignment mechanism and domain wall decay,
since they are generated at T⯝⌳ QCD , that cannot be in the
range 共43兲. Strings start to decay into axions after their formation at T⯝F a . Current models 关6兴 have the bulk of axions
关1兴 R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 共1977兲;
Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 共1977兲.
关2兴 S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 共1978兲; F. Wilczek, ibid.
40, 279 共1978兲.
关3兴 H. Murayama, G. Raffelt, C. Hagmann, K. van Bibber, and
L.J. Rosenberg, Eur. Phys. J. C 15, 298 共2000兲; P. Sikivie,
Nucl. Phys. B 共Proc. Suppl.兲 87, 41 共2000兲; L.J. Rosenberg and
K.A. van Bibber, Phys. Rep. 325, 1 共2000兲.
关4兴 Murayama et al. 关3兴.
关5兴 J. Preskill, M.B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. 120B, 127
共1983兲; L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, ibid. 120B, 133 共1983兲; M.
Dine and W. Fischler, ibid. 120B, 137 共1983兲; M.S. Turner,
Phys. Rev. D 33, 889 共1986兲.
关6兴 R.L. Davis, Phys. Lett. B 180, 225 共1986兲; R.L. Davis and E.P.
Shellard, Nucl. Phys. B324, 167 共1989兲; D. Harari and P.
Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B 195, 361 共1987兲; R.A. Battye and E.P.
produced also at T⯝⌳ QCD . If this is the case, then thermalization effects on string axions are small. However, the physics of axion strings is still not completely settled and we
would like to stress that if a string model or any other source
of non-thermal axions have substantial axion production in
the range 共43兲 then those axions would thermalize and finally
we would have a single thermal population that dilutes away
with the expansion of the universe as we have studied in this
paper.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Cristina Manuel and Georg Raffelt for discussions. The work of E.M. and F.R. is partially supported by
the CICYT Research Project AEN99-0766, by the DGR
Project 2001 SGR 00188, and by the EU network on Supersymmetry and the Early Universe 共HPRN-CT-2000-00152兲.
G.Z. is grateful for hospitality at the Grup de Fisica Teorica
of the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
关7兴
关8兴
关9兴
关10兴
关11兴
023004-5
Shellard, astro-ph/9706014; C. Hagmann, S. Chang, and P.
Sikivie, Phys. Rev. D 63, 125018 共2001兲; C. Hagmann and P.
Sikivie, Nucl. Phys. B363, 247 共1991兲; M. Yamaguchi, M. Kawasaki, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4578
共1999兲.
S. Chang, C. Hagmann, and P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. D 59,
023505 共1999兲, and references therein.
M.S. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2489 共1987兲; 60, 1101共E兲
共1987兲; see also 关9兴, Section 10.3.
E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, The Early Universe, Frontiers in
Physics Vol. 69 共Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1990兲,
p. 547.
J. Bernstein, L.S. Brown, and G. Feinberg, Phys. Rev. D 32,
3261 共1985兲.
M. Le Bellac, Thermal Field Theory 共Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, England, 1996兲, Chap. 6.