* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Scattering of electrons from an interacting region
Survey
Document related concepts
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Bremsstrahlung wikipedia , lookup
Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
Auger electron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Chemical bond wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Reflection high-energy electron diffraction wikipedia , lookup
Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region Abhishek Dhar Raman Research Institute, Bangalore, India. Collaborators: Diptiman Sen (IISc, Bangalore) Dibyendu Roy (Weizmann Institute, Israel). Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 066805 (2008) Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.1/23 The problem of transport L 1111 0000 0000 1111 1111 0000 1111 0000 0000 1111 0000 1111 0000 1111 1111 0000 0000 1111 0000 1111 1111 0000 0000 1111 0000 1111 0000 1111 0000 1111 1111 0000 0000 1111 0000 1111 1111 0000 0000 1111 0000 1111 A A I V ∆V I= = G∆V R 1 G= = conductance of system R For macroscopic systems it is usual to define the resistivity and conductivity of the material RA ρ= l 1 σ= . ρ Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.2/23 Calculating conductivity Microscopic theories for σ: ◮ Kinetic theory (Boltzmann transport theory). Think of diffusing electrons with mean collision time τc . ne2 τc σ= m . ◮ Green-Kubo formula: σ = () lim lim τ →∞ L→∞ Z τ dthJ(0)J(t)i 0 Infinite system size limit necessary. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.3/23 Small systems What about transport in mesoscopic systems and nanosystems ? Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.4/23 Small systems Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.5/23 Calculating conductance Above theories are not directly applicable. It is not meaningful to talk of conductivity. Rather one is interested in the conductance: I . G= ∆V Main question: How do we calculate this? Conductivity: Intrinsic property of system. Conductance: Properties of reservoirs (leads) and contacts important and should be incorporated into calculation. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.6/23 Non-interacting electrons: Landauer formalism This is the most popular approach in mesoscopic physics. Views conduction as a quantum mechanical transmission problem. Simplest version: Scatterer µL T µR TR L 1D leads containing non−interacting electrons (initially in thermal equilibrium) Electronic scattering states given by: ψk (x) = eikx + rk e−ikx left lead = tk eikx right lead Transmission: T (ǫk ) = |tk |2 . Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.7/23 Landauer formula µL µR e I= 2π~ Z dǫT (ǫ)[f (µL , TL , ǫ) − f (µR , TR , ǫ)] For TL = TR = 0: e e2 I = T (ǫF )∆µ = T (ǫF )∆V 2π~ 2π~ I e2 G = = T (ǫF ) . ∆V h The Landauer formula. →Keldysh formalism, quantum Langevin equations also give this. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.8/23 Interacting electrons What happens when electrons DO NOT interact while in the leads, but DO interact in the sample region. This is a harder problem. HR HL HS=H0 + VI S V LS µL TL VRS µR TR HS0 + HL + HR is non-interacting (quadratic Hamiltonian). Coupling VC = VLS + VRS is also quadratic. VI is non-quadratic and represents interactions in sample. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.9/23 General approach Finding density matrix of nonequilibrium steady state (NESS): Solution in two stages. ◮ Start with VC = VI = 0 and eq (µ , T ) ⊗ ρ ⊗ ρ ρ(t = 0) = ρeq L L S R (µR , TR ) L ◮ Let H0 = HS0 + HL + HR + VC . Evolve for infinite time ESS . using H0 and find ρN 0 ◮ ESS . Evolve again for an infinite time Start with ρN 0 ESS using H0 + VI and find ρN . I ˆ N ESS ]. Calculate: J = T r[Jρ I Our contribution: Solving this problem at zero temperature . Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.10/23 Zero temperature case ESS → |φi which is a many-particle state In this case ρN 0 satisfying: H0 |φi = E|φi . The state |φi is known exactly. It is formed of single particle states, |φi = |k1 , k2 , .....kN i, and consists of right moving states (k > 0) filled up to µL and left moving states (k < 0) filled up to µR . With this as the “incident” state we try to find the “scattering state” |ψi satisfying the equation: (H0 + VI )|ψi = E|ψi . ESS and we calculate the |ψi corresponds to ρN I ˆ current using hψ|J|ψi. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.11/23 Lippman-Schwinger theory (H0 + V )|ψi = E|ψi For “incident” state |φi the solution is given by: 1 |ψi = |φi + VI |ψi E + iη − H0 = |φi + G0 VI |ψi = |φi + G0 V |φi + G0 VI G0 VI |φi + ... , 1 where G = E+iη−H is the non-interacting Green’s 0 function. Can find scattering state (and thus the nonequilibrium steady state) perturbatively. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.12/23 Earlier work ◮ Mehta and Andrei, PRL (2006) For particular model with δ-function interaction find exact many-particle scattering state by Bethe-Ansatz. Find a solution corresponding to the correct incident state. Use this to find exact steady state current. ◮ Goorden and Buttiker, PRL (2007) Find two-particle scattering state in a two channel problem with interactions in a local region. ◮ Nonequilibrium Kondo problem: Results from nonequilibrium Green’s function, Numerical RG, Density Matrix RG. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.13/23 Model of 1D spinles Fermions Dot −4 −3 −2 −1 Left Lead ◮ 0 1 U 2 3 4 5 Right Lead Hamiltonian of the model, HL = − ∞ X (c†x cx+1 + c†x+1 cx ), x=−∞ VI = U n 0 n 1 , ◮ Single particle state: φk (x) = eikx Energy ǫk = −2 cos k and −π < k ≤ π. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.14/23 Two particles ◮ Two particle incoming state specified by k = (k1 , k2 ) given by: φk (x) = ei(k1 x1 +k2 x2 ) − ei(k2 x1 +k1 x2 ) Ek = ǫk1 + ǫk2 . ◮ Two-particle scattering state can be found exactly. Let 0 = (1, 0). ψk (x) = φk (x) + U KEk (x)ψk (0) where KEk (x) = hx|G+ 0 (Ek )|0i ¯ φk (0) ψk (0) = ¯ (0)] [1 − U K Ek ¯ ¯ Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.15/23 Two particle S-matrix ◮ Two electrons from the noninteracting leads with initial momenta (k1 , k2 ) emerge, after scattering, with momenta (k1′ , k2′ ). At x = (x1 , x2 ) one has x1 x2 = . ′ ′ sin(k1 ) sin(k2 ) ◮ Energy is conserved, i.e., Ek = Ek′ ; but momentum is not conserved because the interaction term U n0 n1 breaks translation invariance. ◮ Probably not solvable by Bethe-Ansatz. ◮ Bound states. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.16/23 Wavepacket dynamics ◮ We numerically study time evolution of a two-particle wave-packet which passes throught the interacting region. ◮ We form the wave-packet with the complete set of the exact two-particle scattering eigenstates and determine their time-evolution through: Z π Z q1 1 −iEq t Ψ(x, t) = dq dq a(q)ψ (x) e , 1 2 q 2 (2π) −π −π X where a(q) = Ψ(x, t = 0) ψq∗ (x). x1 >x2 Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.17/23 Wavepacket dynamics (a) incident wave-packet, (b) after passing through the origin with U = 0, (c) after passing through the origin with U = 2. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.18/23 Two-particle current. ◮ Current is given by the expectation value of the operator jx = −i(c†x cx+1 − h.c.) in the scattering state |ψk i = |φk i + |Sk i. ◮ Current in the incident state is given by hφk |jx |φk i = 2[sin(k1 ) + sin(k2 )]N , N = total number of sites in the entire system. ◮ Change in current due to scattering, δj(k1 , k2 ) = hSk |jx |Sk i + hSk |jx |φk i + hφk |jx |Sk i 2|φk (0)|2 Im[KEk (0)] = [sgn(k1 ) + sgn(k2 )] ¯ ¯ 2 |1/U − KEk (0)| ¯ where sgn(k) ≡ |k|/k. δj ∼ U 2 . Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.19/23 N-particle generalisation ◮ For incident state |φkN i = |k1 , k2 , ...kN i we cannot find |ψkN i exactly for N ≥ 3. ◮ Scattered wave is given by |ψkN i = |φkN i + |SkN i. Do second order perturbation theory |SkN i = G0 VI |kN i + G0 VI G0 VI |kN i + .... ◮ Three processes at O(U 2 ). ◮ Consider only two-particle scattering. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.20/23 Change in Landauer current ◮ hkN |ĵ|kN i gives the Landauer current. ◮ Change in current value is given by: δjN = hψkN |ĵ|ψkN i − hkN |ĵ|kN i Z Z 1 = dk1 k2 δj(k1 , k2 ) . 2 2(2π) We find that the Landauer current e2 /h is reduced by a term of order U 2 . In the presence of impurities reduction is O(U ). Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.21/23 Other applications ◮ More general dot with applied gate voltage. ◮ Study of resonance behaviour in systems like parallel and series double dots. Dot −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 U Left Lead 3 4 5 Right Lead II U −4 −3 −2 −1 0 0 1 2 3 4 I Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.22/23 Other applications ◮ Parallel conductors in proximity to each other and interacting in some localised region. −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 ◮ Electrons with spin, interactions on more sites. ◮ Entanglement by interactions. Lippman-Schwinger scattering theory provides a nice framework to study zero temperature nonequilibrium steady states of electrons driven across an interacting region by a finite chemical potential bias. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.23/23