Download Scattering of electrons from an interacting region

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup

Bremsstrahlung wikipedia , lookup

Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Bohr model wikipedia , lookup

Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup

Auger electron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Chemical bond wikipedia , lookup

Electron wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Reflection high-energy electron diffraction wikipedia , lookup

Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup

Cross section (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Electron-beam lithography wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Scattering of electrons from an interacting
region
Abhishek Dhar
Raman Research Institute,
Bangalore, India.
Collaborators:
Diptiman Sen (IISc, Bangalore)
Dibyendu Roy (Weizmann Institute, Israel).
Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 066805 (2008)
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.1/23
The problem of transport
L
1111
0000
0000
1111
1111
0000
1111
0000
0000
1111
0000
1111
0000
1111
1111
0000
0000
1111
0000
1111
1111
0000
0000
1111
0000
1111
0000
1111
0000
1111
1111
0000
0000
1111
0000
1111
1111
0000
0000
1111
0000
1111
A
A
I
V
∆V
I=
= G∆V
R
1
G=
= conductance of system
R
For macroscopic systems it is usual to define the
resistivity and conductivity of the material
RA
ρ=
l
1
σ= .
ρ
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.2/23
Calculating conductivity
Microscopic theories for σ:
◮
Kinetic theory (Boltzmann transport theory). Think
of diffusing electrons with mean collision time τc .
ne2 τc
σ=
m
.
◮
Green-Kubo formula:
σ = () lim lim
τ →∞ L→∞
Z
τ
dthJ(0)J(t)i
0
Infinite system size limit necessary.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.3/23
Small systems
What about transport in mesoscopic systems and
nanosystems ?
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.4/23
Small systems
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.5/23
Calculating conductance
Above theories are not directly applicable. It is not
meaningful to talk of conductivity. Rather one is
interested in the conductance:
I
.
G=
∆V
Main question: How do we calculate this?
Conductivity: Intrinsic property of system.
Conductance: Properties of reservoirs (leads) and
contacts important and should be incorporated into
calculation.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.6/23
Non-interacting electrons:
Landauer formalism
This is the most popular approach in mesoscopic
physics. Views conduction as a quantum mechanical
transmission problem. Simplest version:
Scatterer
µL T
µR TR
L
1D leads containing
non−interacting electrons
(initially in thermal equilibrium)
Electronic scattering states given by:
ψk (x) = eikx + rk e−ikx
left lead
= tk eikx right lead
Transmission: T (ǫk ) = |tk |2 .
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.7/23
Landauer formula
µL
µR
e
I=
2π~
Z
dǫT (ǫ)[f (µL , TL , ǫ) − f (µR , TR , ǫ)]
For TL = TR = 0:
e
e2
I =
T (ǫF )∆µ =
T (ǫF )∆V
2π~
2π~
I
e2
G =
= T (ǫF ) .
∆V
h
The Landauer formula. →Keldysh formalism, quantum
Langevin equations also give this. Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.8/23
Interacting electrons
What happens when electrons DO NOT interact while
in the leads, but DO interact in the sample region. This
is a harder problem.
HR
HL
HS=H0
+ VI
S
V
LS
µL
TL
VRS
µR TR
HS0 + HL + HR is non-interacting (quadratic
Hamiltonian).
Coupling VC = VLS + VRS is also quadratic.
VI is non-quadratic and represents interactions in sample.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.9/23
General approach
Finding density matrix of nonequilibrium steady state
(NESS): Solution in two stages.
◮
Start with VC = VI = 0 and
eq
(µ
,
T
)
⊗
ρ
⊗
ρ
ρ(t = 0) = ρeq
L
L
S
R (µR , TR )
L
◮
Let H0 = HS0 + HL + HR + VC . Evolve for infinite time
ESS
.
using H0 and find ρN
0
◮
ESS
. Evolve again for an infinite time
Start with ρN
0
ESS
using H0 + VI and find ρN
.
I
ˆ N ESS ].
Calculate: J = T r[Jρ
I
Our contribution: Solving this problem at zero
temperature .
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.10/23
Zero temperature case
ESS
→ |φi which is a many-particle state
In this case ρN
0
satisfying:
H0 |φi = E|φi .
The state |φi is known exactly. It is formed of single
particle states, |φi = |k1 , k2 , .....kN i, and consists of right
moving states (k > 0) filled up to µL and left moving
states (k < 0) filled up to µR .
With this as the “incident” state we try to find the
“scattering state” |ψi satisfying the equation:
(H0 + VI )|ψi = E|ψi .
ESS
and we calculate the
|ψi corresponds to ρN
I
ˆ
current using hψ|J|ψi.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.11/23
Lippman-Schwinger theory
(H0 + V )|ψi = E|ψi
For “incident” state |φi the solution is given by:
1
|ψi = |φi +
VI |ψi
E + iη − H0
= |φi + G0 VI |ψi
= |φi + G0 V |φi + G0 VI G0 VI |φi + ... ,
1
where G = E+iη−H
is the non-interacting Green’s
0
function.
Can find scattering state (and thus the nonequilibrium
steady state) perturbatively.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.12/23
Earlier work
◮
Mehta and Andrei, PRL (2006)
For particular model with δ-function interaction
find exact many-particle scattering state by
Bethe-Ansatz. Find a solution corresponding to the
correct incident state. Use this to find exact
steady state current.
◮
Goorden and Buttiker, PRL (2007)
Find two-particle scattering state in a two channel
problem with interactions in a local region.
◮
Nonequilibrium Kondo problem: Results from
nonequilibrium Green’s function, Numerical RG,
Density Matrix RG.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.13/23
Model of 1D spinles Fermions
Dot
−4
−3 −2 −1
Left Lead
◮
0
1
U
2
3
4
5
Right Lead
Hamiltonian of the model,
HL = −
∞
X
(c†x cx+1 + c†x+1 cx ),
x=−∞
VI = U n 0 n 1 ,
◮
Single particle state: φk (x) = eikx
Energy ǫk = −2 cos k and −π < k ≤ π.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.14/23
Two particles
◮
Two particle incoming state specified by
k = (k1 , k2 ) given by:
φk (x) = ei(k1 x1 +k2 x2 ) − ei(k2 x1 +k1 x2 )
Ek = ǫk1 + ǫk2 .
◮
Two-particle scattering state can be found
exactly. Let 0 = (1, 0).
ψk (x) = φk (x) + U KEk (x)ψk (0)
where KEk (x) = hx|G+
0 (Ek )|0i
¯
φk (0)
ψk (0) =
¯ (0)]
[1
−
U
K
Ek
¯
¯
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.15/23
Two particle S-matrix
◮
Two electrons from the noninteracting leads with
initial momenta (k1 , k2 ) emerge, after scattering,
with momenta (k1′ , k2′ ). At x = (x1 , x2 ) one has
x1
x2
=
.
′
′
sin(k1 )
sin(k2 )
◮
Energy is conserved, i.e., Ek = Ek′ ; but momentum
is not conserved because the interaction term
U n0 n1 breaks translation invariance.
◮
Probably not solvable by Bethe-Ansatz.
◮
Bound states.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.16/23
Wavepacket dynamics
◮
We numerically study time evolution of a
two-particle wave-packet which passes throught
the interacting region.
◮
We form the wave-packet with the complete set
of the exact two-particle scattering eigenstates
and determine their time-evolution through:
Z π
Z q1
1
−iEq t
Ψ(x, t) =
dq
dq
a(q)ψ
(x)
e
,
1
2
q
2
(2π) −π
−π
X
where a(q) =
Ψ(x, t = 0) ψq∗ (x).
x1 >x2
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.17/23
Wavepacket dynamics
(a) incident wave-packet, (b) after passing through
the origin with U = 0, (c) after passing through the origin with U = 2.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.18/23
Two-particle current.
◮
Current is given by the expectation value of the
operator jx = −i(c†x cx+1 − h.c.) in the scattering
state |ψk i = |φk i + |Sk i.
◮
Current in the incident state is given by
hφk |jx |φk i = 2[sin(k1 ) + sin(k2 )]N ,
N = total number of sites in the entire system.
◮
Change in current due to scattering,
δj(k1 , k2 ) = hSk |jx |Sk i + hSk |jx |φk i + hφk |jx |Sk i
2|φk (0)|2 Im[KEk (0)]
=
[sgn(k1 ) + sgn(k2 )]
¯
¯
2
|1/U − KEk (0)|
¯
where sgn(k) ≡ |k|/k. δj ∼ U 2 .
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.19/23
N-particle generalisation
◮
For incident state |φkN i = |k1 , k2 , ...kN i we cannot
find |ψkN i exactly for N ≥ 3.
◮
Scattered wave is given by |ψkN i = |φkN i + |SkN i.
Do second order perturbation theory
|SkN i = G0 VI |kN i + G0 VI G0 VI |kN i + ....
◮
Three processes at O(U 2 ).
◮
Consider only two-particle scattering.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.20/23
Change in Landauer current
◮
hkN |ĵ|kN i gives the Landauer current.
◮
Change in current value is given by:
δjN = hψkN |ĵ|ψkN i − hkN |ĵ|kN i
Z
Z
1
=
dk1 k2 δj(k1 , k2 ) .
2
2(2π)
We find that the Landauer current e2 /h is reduced by
a term of order U 2 . In the presence of impurities
reduction is O(U ).
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.21/23
Other applications
◮
More general dot with applied gate voltage.
◮
Study of resonance behaviour in systems like
parallel and series double dots.
Dot
−4
−3 −2 −1
0
1
2
U
Left Lead
3
4
5
Right Lead
II
U
−4
−3
−2
−1
0
0
1
2
3
4
I
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.22/23
Other applications
◮
Parallel conductors in proximity to each other and
interacting in some localised region.
−4
−3 −2 −1
0
1
2
3
4
−4 −3 −2 −1
0
1
2
3
4
◮
Electrons with spin, interactions on more sites.
◮
Entanglement by interactions.
Lippman-Schwinger scattering theory provides a nice
framework to study zero temperature nonequilibrium
steady states of electrons driven across an interacting
region by a finite chemical potential bias.
Scattering of electrons from an interacting region – p.23/23