* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Inhibition of Smooth Muscle Cells Proliferation Using Sirolimus
Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup
Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup
Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup
Drug design wikipedia , lookup
Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Discovery and development of direct thrombin inhibitors wikipedia , lookup
Theralizumab wikipedia , lookup
Inhibition of Smooth Muscle Cells Proliferation Using Sirolimus Loaded, Heparin Bound-Polymeric Micelles Jayesh V Betala,1 Sooneon Bae,1 Eugene M. Langan III, M.D.,2 JeoungSoo Lee, Ph.D.,1 Martine LaBerge, Ph.D. 1 1 Bioengineering Department, Clemson University, Clemson SC, 2 Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC Statement of Purpose: Drug Eluting Stents (DES) are significantly popular for reducing in-stent restenosis (ISR) as compared to bare metal stents.1 However, their long term efficacy remains a problem, mainly because of late-stent thrombosis and delayed endothelialization.2 The objective of this project is to develop a Sirolimus loaded, Heparin bound polymeric micelles that can be delivered locally, which can inhibit smooth muscle cells proliferation after balloon angioplasty. A cationic, amphiphilic polymer, poly (lactide-co-glycolide) -graft-polyethyleneimine (PLGA-gPEI, PgP) micelle was synthesized in 4D Lab (Bioengineering, Clemson University). We hypothesized that Sirolimus, a hydrophobic drug, will encapsulate in the hydrophobic core and heparin, a negatively charged molecule, will bind to positively charged PgP. We evaluated the loading efficiency of Sirolimus and antiproliferative effects on SMCs after days 3 and 7. Methods: Sirolimus was loaded using solvent evaporation method. Briefly, Sirolimus was dissolved in methanol and various concentration of sirolimus solution (100 µL) was added to 1 mg/ml PgP, dissolved in DI water. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 4 hours. The organic solvent was then evaporated overnight. The non-loaded drug was removed by filtering through a 0.45 µm syringe filter. Amount of Sirolimus loaded was analyzed using HPLC (Symmetry C18, 3.5 µm, Waters). The loading efficiency was calculated as follows, % loading efficiency= (the amount of Sirolimus loaded in the PgP/the amount of Sirolimus added into PgP) X 100. Particle size of PgP was determined using dynamic light scattering (DLS) before and after loading. SMCs isolated from rat aorta, between passage 3 and 5, were seeded at a density of 2×104 and 1×104 cells/ ml for 24 hours, in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% Ab-Am, for day 3 and day 7, respectively. After 24 hours, SMCs were treated with Sirolimus-loaded PgP (SPgP-50µg/ml, Sirolimus-2.6µg/ml) and Sirolimus alone (dissolved in DMSO) for 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes. After treatment, DMEM containing Sirolimus was removed and replenished with fresh DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% AbAm. PgP alone and untreated cells were used as control. SMCs proliferation was evaluated at day 3 and 7 by MTT assay. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test, with p-value <0.05 considered to be significant. Results: Sirolimus loading efficiency increased with increasing concentration of Sirolimus added into PgP (1 mg/ml) solution (Fig 1). However, the loading efficiency was reached maximum, when 300 µg/ml Sirolimus was added into PgP solution (~23%). Sirolimus solution was not soluble in water, so it was completely removed after filtering through syringe filter. PgP increased sirolimus solubility approximately 25 times than solubility in water. Figure 1: Sirolimus loading of PgP micelles using solvent evaporation method. Mean± SE. (n=4) DLS did not show any significant difference in size before (130±4 nm) and after loading (125±4 nm). Sirolimus loaded PgP showed significant inhibition of SMCs after 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes-treatment as compared to sirolimus alone at day 3 and day 7, while no cytotoxicity was observed from PgP alone. Untreated SMCs were considered to be at 100 % (Table 1). Anova indicated significant difference between treated and control cells with p-value<0.001(n=6). Figure 2: SMCs proliferation evaluated by MTT assay after day 3 and day 7. * P-value< 0.001 (n=6) compared to untreated control Conclusion: Sirolimus loaded PgP micelles significantly inhibited SMCs proliferation up to day 7, as compared to Sirolimus alone. An anti-proliferative drug, such as Sirolimus and an anti-thrombotic drug, Heparin, can be delivered locally at the same time using these micelles. This biomaterial platform provides promising results for the local delivery of Sirolimus loaded and Heparin bound polymeric micelles to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation after balloon angioplasty. Acknowledgements: NIGMS of the National Institutes of Health under award number 5P20GM103444-07 and Page Morton Hunter Endowment. References: 1) Htay T, Liu MW. Vascular Health and Risk Management. 2005;1(4):263-276 2) Edoardo C, P. Gabriel S, and William W. Circulation. 2007; 115:14401455.