Download Presentation - Regional Policy Briefings

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup

Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The blue economy: new threats and
opportunities to sustainable use of
marine resources
Gillian Cambers, SPC, GCCA: PSIS project
Outline
1. Regional vulnerability assessment
2. How will climate change affect fisheries
and aquaculture resources?
3. How will these changes affect
economic development and food
security and how should we adapt?
1. Approach used
Projected changes to atmospheric
and oceanic conditions
Ecosystems supporting fish
Fish stocks
Implications for economic
development, food security and
livelihoods
Adaptations, policies and
investments needed to maintain
productivity
Vulnerability
assessment
• 88 authors
• 36 institutions
• Summary for policy
makers
http://www.spc.int/climate-change/fisheries/assessment/
2. How will climate change affect
fisheries and aquaculture resources
• Tuna
• Coral reef fish
• Freshwater fish
• Coastal aquaculture
• Pond aquaculture
Projected effects on skipjack tuna
A2 emissions scenario
Catch in 2009
2000
2050
Source: Lehodey et al. (2011)
•
•
1.75 million tonnes
~ USD 2.2 billion
Effects due to:
•
Increases in sea surface
temperature in eastern Pacific
•
Shift of prime feeding areas to the
east (convergence between the
Warm Pool and Pacific Equatorial
Divergence Province)
Effects on skipjack tuna catches
West (average) A2
East (average) A2
2035
2050
2100
A22035
2050
2100
~ +10%
0%
~ -20%
+35-40%
+40-45%
+25-30%
Changes relative to 19801999 average catch
Projected effects on coral reef fish
A2 emissions scenario
Today
2035 (-2 to -5%)
Effects due to:
2050 (-20%)
2100 (-20 to -50%)
•
Increased sea surface
temperature and more
frequent bleaching
•
•
Ocean acidification
•
Cyclones of greater
intensity
Greater runoff of
nutrients due to higher
rainfall
Effects on freshwater fish catch
A2 emissions scenario
2035
2050
2100
+2.5%
+2.5 to
+7.5%
+2.5 to
+12.5%
Effects due to:
•
•
•
Increased air temperature
Higher flow rates
Increased freshwater
habitat
Coastal aquaculture commodities
• Pearls
A2 emissions scenario
2035
2050
2100
• Shrimp
Effects due to:
•
Increased sea surface
temperature
• Seaweed
•
•
Ocean acidification
•
•
•
Sea-level rise
Marine
ornamentals
Greater runoff of
nutrients
More-intense cyclones
Pond aquaculture commodities
• Tilapia
a)
b)
A2 emissions scenario
2035
2050
2100
Effects due to:
•
Increased surface air
temperature (faster
growth rates in ponds)
•
Higher rainfall (more
places to build ponds)
Summary of changes in production
A2 emissions scenario
Resource
West
2035
Freshwater fisheries
Aquaculture
*Fish in ponds
*Coastal commodities
2100
2035
Negligible
Tuna
Coastal fisheries
2050
East
Negligible
Negligible
2050
2100
3. How will these changes affect
economic development and food
security and how should we adapt?
Key points
•
Small PICTs in east with greatest
dependency on tuna should receive
additional benefits!
• Losses of revenue and GDP occur mainly
in large PICTs in west where tuna makes a
relatively low contribution to economic
development (due to size of economies)
How should PICTs adapt?
• To reduce the threats
• To harness the opportunities
Adaptations (economic development)
‘Vessel Days Scheme’ to
manage effort of industrial
tuna fleets
• Skipjack tuna move 20003000 km along the equatorial
Pacific , depending on ENSO
events
• The vessel day effort
management scheme allows
the fleet to follow the fish and
ensures that all PNA countries
still receive some benefits
Vessel owners fishing in PNA waters
can purchase and trade fishing days
depending on the location of the tuna.
VDS has potential to be modified
regularly to accommodate movement
Ask
of tuna to the east
Adaptations (economic development)
Energy audits of industrial
fishing vessels
• Addresses likelihood of near-term rises
in fuel costs
• Will assist national fleets from PNG and
Solomon Islands that may have to go
greater distances in the future to catch
fish for their canneries
How could changes to coastal fisheries
affect fish available for food security?
• Plans are to provide
35 kg of fish per
person per year as
populations grow
• Maintain traditional
fish consumption
where it is >35 kg
Where will the fish come from?
• By increasing access of coastal
communities to tuna
Only tuna can fill the gap
Solomon Islands
2035 (33,947 t)
64%
27%
2050 (41,345 t)
46%
43%
2100 (68,910 t)
24%
0
10
11%
20
61%
30
40
50
60
70
80
Fish
(tonnes x tonnes
1000) (x1000)
Fish needed
forneeded
food security
Coastal fisheries
Freshwater fisheries
Pond aquaculture
Tuna (and bycatch)
Adaptations (food security)
•Restore and sustain fisheries and their
habitats
•Increase access to tuna for subsistence
fishers with low-cost, inshore Fish
Aggregating Devices (FADs)
•Store and distribute low value tuna
and bycatch from industrial fleets to
urban areas
•Develop pond aquaculture
Summary
Economic development
• East gains, where PICTs have high dependence,
west has loses but effects on GDP are small
Food security
• Contribution of coastal fisheries will decrease,
but gap can be filled mainly by tuna
• Pond aquaculture favoured by climate change
Summary
Adaptations
• Win-win adaptations available for economic
development and food security
• Adaptations need to be implemented urgently for
coastal fisheries to reduce natural and man made
impacts and build resilience to climate change
Acknowledgements
Many