Download Mean field theory and Hartree

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Spin (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Perturbation theory wikipedia , lookup

Field (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental interaction wikipedia , lookup

History of physics wikipedia , lookup

Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Nordström's theory of gravitation wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Yang–Mills theory wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Time in physics wikipedia , lookup

Condensed matter physics wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Geometrical frustration wikipedia , lookup

Hamiltonian mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Physics 555 Fall 2007
Mean field theory and Hartree-Fock theory
Perhaps the first mean-field theory was the alteration of the Curie law χ ∝ 1 / T for a
paramagnet, to the Curie-Weiss law χ ∝ 1 / (T − Tc ) for a ferromagnet at T above the Curie
temperature Tc. The derivation says that roughly speaking, a microscopic spin sees, not the separate
spins on its neighbors, but the number of neighbors times the average spin. This becomes more
accurate, the more neighbors there are, and therefore less accurate the fewer, or the lower the spatial
dimensionality.
There is a corresponding microscopic mean field theory. The simplest version is the Ising
case where we pretend spins only orient along z. The notion σi denotes the z-component of the ith
spin. The Ising Hamiltonian is
J n.n.
J n. n.
H ISING = − ∑ σ iσ j = ∑ σ i σ j + σ i σ j − σ i σ j + (σ i − σ i ) σ j − σ j
(1)
2 i≠ j
2 i≠ j
The mean-field approximation consists of neglecting the last term, which is quadratic in
fluctuations around mean values σ j = σ . Then, neglecting a constant term, we have
[
(
)]
H ISING , MF = −∑i σ i Beff , where the effective magnetic field is Beff = zJ σ , and z is the number of
neighbors. This is the “Weiss molecular field,” and generates the Curie-Weiss law, by solving selfconsistently for σ . It also gives a theory for the low-T broken-symmetry ferromagnetic phase.
Now consider the Hamiltonian for a system of electrons. It can be written as the sum of a
single-particle part and the Coulomb term, namely
1
(2)
Hˆ 1 + Hˆ int = ∑ m hˆ1 n cm+ cn +
m′m VˆCoulomb n′n cm+ ′cm+ cn cn′ ,
∑
2 m , n , m′ , n ′
n,m
r
r r
where hˆ = p 2 / 2m + V (r ) , and Vˆ
= e 2 / r − r ′ . A mean-field version of this Hamiltonian is
1
Coulomb
constructed analogously to the mean-field version of the Ising Hamiltonian, and is called the
Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian,
1
Hˆ HF = ∑ m hˆ1 n cm+ cn +
m′m VˆCoulomb n′n cm+ ′cm+ cn cn′ pairwise − average
∑
2 m , n , m ′ , n′
n,m
The pairwise average is more complicated here than the partial spin average in the mean-field
version of the Ising model. There are two different ways that the average of a pair of the coperators can be non-zero, with opposite relative signs because of the anti-commuting property of
the operators,
cm+ ′ cm+ cn cn′ pairwise −average = Dˆ + Eˆ ,
[
[
]
]
Dˆ = cm+ ′cn′ cm+ cn + cm+ ′cn′ cm+ cn − cm+ ′ cn′ cm+ cn
.
Eˆ = − cm+ ′cn cm+ cn ' − cm+ ′ cn cm+ cn′ + cm+ ′cn cm+ cn′
Here D̂ contains the “direct” terms, and Ê contains the “exchange” terms. The third part of both
D̂ and Ê is an average, not an operator, and doesn’t affect dynamics, just total energy. It can be
dropped for now. The first two terms of both D̂ and Ê are identical, after re-labeling indices, and
are single Slater
using ca+ cb = ca+ ca δ ab (which is true when the states used in the average
determinants.) Then the Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian can be written
⎧
⎫
Hˆ HF = ∑ ⎨ m hˆ1 n + ∑ cs+ cs sm VˆCoulomb sn − sm VˆCoulomb ns ⎬cm+ cn . (3)
m,n ⎩
s
⎭
This equation, if diagonalized self-consistently, gives Hartree-Fock eigenvalues and orbitals.
[
]