Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Investment fund wikipedia , lookup
Financial economics wikipedia , lookup
History of the Federal Reserve System wikipedia , lookup
Money supply wikipedia , lookup
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate wikipedia , lookup
Investment management wikipedia , lookup
Investment Stewardship Guidance InvestmentPerspectives December 2012 Fed’s QE3 Expected to Total Nearly $1T - Marquette Associates Survey Institutional Fixed Income Managers Share QE3 Endgame Expectations Eric Przybylinski, CFA, CAIA, SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST On September 14, the Federal Reserve announced that it would begin another round of quantitative easing by purchasing $40 billion dollars of mortgaged backed securities (MBS) a month. The plan, referred to as QE3 by analysts, is intended to boost a U.S. economy suffering from high unemployment. Investors have closely followed the Fed’s Quantitative Easing (“QE”) programs due to the unconventional monetary policies’ effects on broader asset markets, as well as the possibility that Fed actions may stoke inflation down the line. Given the open-ended nature of QE3, market expectations of the size, duration, and effectiveness of the plan may be both especially relevant and diverse. To gauge market perceptions of the plan, Reuters surveyed and reported on the forecasts from bank economists, as reported on October 6. While banks, especially primary dealers, are important members of the U.S. fixed income markets, so too are asset managers. To that end, Marquette Associates, Inc. conducted a similar survey of large institutional fixed income money managers regarding their opinions on QE3. The 35 respondents to Marquette’s survey broadly agreed with economists surveyed by Reuters about the goals of QE3. Both economists and asset managers think the Fed is targeting Exhibit 1: At What Unemployment Rate Would the Fed Halt QE3? about 7% unemployment on average before 45% terminating the program. While the asset managers surveyed had a variety of opinions regarding other aspects of QE3, there was 35% relatively strong agreement on this number. 30% Nearly half of all responding managers 25% unemployment rate falls to 6.75-7.00%. The believe the Fed will halt additional QE if the 20% majority of economists and asset managers 15% purchase Treasuries after Operation Twist 10% ends at the close of the year. Previously, 5% Treasuries as it purchased longer duration the Fed had been selling short duration Unemployment Rate <5.75% 5.75-6.0% 6.0-6.25% 6.25-6.5% 6.5-6.75% 6.75-7.0% 7.0-7.25% Treasuries. 72.5-7.5% 0% also agreed that the Fed will continue to 7.5-7.75% PERCENT OF MANAGERS 40% Interestingly, asset managers generally believe that the ultimate size of QE3 will be significantly larger than the economists 180 North Lasalle Street, Suite 3500, Chicago, Illinois 60601 PHONE 312-527-5500 WEB marquetteassociates.com in the Reuters survey. The median economist Exhibit 2: Size of QE3 predicts the ultimate size of QE3 will be $600 billion, while the median asset manager 16% believes the size of QE3 will amount to $975 14% responses, there was a wide array of opinions billion. responses are summarized by Exhibit 2. 10% In addition to these questions, asset managers 8% also shared their opinions on the duration 6% of QE3, as well as what inflation rate would cause the Fed to halt QE purchases. The 4% median manager thinks QE3 will extend to 2% continued trend of gradual improvements >$1650B $1501-1650B $1351-1500B $1201-1350B $1051-1200B $901-1050B $751-900B $601-750B the 1st or 2nd quarter of 2014. Assuming a $451-600B 0% In contrast to the unemployment regarding the ultimate size of QE3. Survey 12% $300-450B PERCENT OF MANAGERS 18% to unemployment, this is consistent with an unemployment rate of about 6.75-7.00% in the first half of 2014. The goal of the Fed’s asset purchases is to boost growth, primarily by increasing Exhibit 3: Duration of QE3 inflation expectations, the “wealth effect” 12.0 of rising stock prices, and aiding the housing recovery. Somewhat higher inflation would 10.0 lead to higher nominal GDP growth and decreased debt burdens in real dollars would speed the deleveraging process. 8.0 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE This coupled with lower bond yields could boost the returns of risk assets. Of course, if 6.0 inflation runs too high it would be a negative for most asset classes’ returns. Based on 4.0 breakeven inflation rates, the Fed so far may have been more effective at increasing long-term inflation expectations than in the 2.0 0.0 Nov-04 short-term. Five year inflation expectations five years out have steadily been rising, while Nov-06 Nov-08 Nov-10 Nov-12 Nov-14 inflation expectations over the next five years have been falling. Uncertainty about the Fed’s commitment to its strategy, as well as the unknown inflationary impact of unconventional monetary policy, may hinder the effectiveness of QE3. On one hand, if the Fed has little tolerance for even slightly higher inflation, it may halt stimulus just as it becomes effective. On the other hand, if stimulus is too effective, rapidly rising inflation may force the Fed to reverse course quickly and potentially raise interest rates. While most asset managers are roughly in agreement about the Fed’s employment goals, there is disagreement on how much inflation the Fed will tolerate to get there. The median manager believes the Fed will continue QE3 purchases until inflation rises to 3.3-3.5% as measured by core CPI. As a point of reference, the October reading of core CPI was 2.0%. Core CPI tends to run 0.35% higher than the core personal consumption expenditures index (PCE), the Fed’s preferred inflation measure; this implies that the median manager expects the Fed to tolerate moderate - but not significantly higher - inflation to reach its goals. Fed’s QE3 Expected to Total Nearly $1T December 2012 2 However, the dispersion of responses is Exhibit 4: At What Level of Core CPI Would the Fed Halt QE3? 25% telling, and points to the dilemma the Fed faces when influencing expectations. Though the median response was 3.4% inflation, a relatively large number of managers believe 20% that the Fed would tolerate either much higher or lower levels of inflation. 15% Low expectations could indicate a belief that either the Fed’s stimulus will prove ineffective, or a belief that the Fed is not committed 10% to further stimulus in the face of even mild inflation. Higher expectations could indicate either a belief in the commitment of the Fed, 5% or a belief that QE could cause much higher inflation down the road. The Fed’s ability to >4.3% 4.1-4.3% 3.9-4.1% 3.7-3.9% 3.5-3.7% 3.3-3.5% 3.1-3.3% 2.9-3.1% 2.7-2.9% get the mix just right will continue to play an 2.5-2.7% 0% important role in the gradual U.S. economic recovery and asset class returns. While growth has been tepid, the U.S. has enjoyed stronger than expected GDP growth in the wake of a financial crisis, and one of the best performing equity markets in the developed world. This is at least partly due to more accommodative policy from the Fed compared to other developed central banks. In the short-term, if the Fed succeeds, interest rates may stay lower for longer. In the medium-term, however, if the Fed is effective in its goals the level of rates should normalize sooner than it would have otherwise. A return to normalized growth following continued deleveraging should be a boost to growth sensitive assets, such as equities. If the Fed fails in its goal to stimulate growth and external shocks push the U.S. towards recession, Treasuries should be strong relative performers, despite already low rates. Finally, if stimulus does stoke inflation, financial assets could suffer, while commodities outperform. Fed’s QE3 Expected to Total Nearly $1T December 2012 3 PREPARED BY MARQUETTE ASSOCIATES 180 North LaSalle St, Ste 3500, Chicago, Illinois 60601 PHONE 312-527-5500 WEB marquetteassociates.com The sources of information used in this report are believed to be reliable. Marquette Associates, Inc. has not independently verified all of the information and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Opinions, estimates, projections and comments on financial market trends constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. References to specific securities are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. About Marquette Associates Marquette Associates is an independent investment consulting firm that guides institutional investment programs with a focused three-point approach and careful research. For over 26 years Marquette has served this mission in close collaboration with clients – enabling institutions to be more effective investment stewards. Marquette is a completely independent and 100% employee-owned consultancy founded with the sole purpose of advising institutions. For more information, please visit www.marquetteassociates.com. Fed’s QE3 Expected to Total Nearly $1T December 2012 4