Download S_150_199 - StealthSkater

E-Mails S-150 through S-199__
S-150. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's proposed laser plasma
S-151. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more plasma-related articles
S-152. from Jack Sarfatti regarding actual working hardware and UFO theories
S-153. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Magnetized Plasmas
S-154. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding skeptics and lack-of-funding
S-155. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding my tactics of alerting Congress
S-156. from Bryan Willoughby regarding building a demo prototype
S-157. from Bryan Willoughby regarding his "Master Plan" for UNITEL
S-158. from Bryan Willoughby regarding promoting these new technologies on a Global scale
S-159. from Bryan Willoughby regarding strategies on forging successful ventures
S-160. from Larry Maurer forwarding an e-mail he sent
S-161. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding ORMEs
S-162. from Bryan Willoughby regarding superstrings, Taylor Kramer, Tesla
S-163. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding others who may be exploring similar technologies
S-164. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding search for a protégé student of UCLA's Dr. John
Dawson
S-165. from Ken Myers regarding comments of others concerning ORMEs
S-166. from Bryan Willoughby regarding another Unification theory posted on KeelyNet
S-167. from Bryan Willoughby regarding an Australian inventor who's being sued by investors
S-168. from Bob King regarding other Montauk whistle-blowers besides the 4 most commonly known
S-169. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail sent to an associate of Dr. Greer's
S-170. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding last-minute touches to UNITEL's newsletters
S-171. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding another abrupt shift of support from another camp
S-172. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Dr. Steven Greer
S-173. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Dr. Eugene Mallove
S-174. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Sarfatti's comments (e-mail # 173)
S-175. from Bob King regarding email # 174 that included references to "Reichian" technology
S-176. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding new ideas to generate income
S-177. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Foreward to the UNITEL book "Flying Colors"
S-178. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UCLA wave collapse research in laser plasmas
S-179. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding response from NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion
Project
S-180. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding e-mail to Tom Bearden explaining 'quantum
tunneling' for space travel
S-181. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding technical details of UNITEL's back-engineering
S-182. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding response to Bob Drake (associate of Michio Kaku's)
S-183. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the Irish inventor claims of tapping the ZPE
S-184. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contacting Ann Drunyan (Mrs. Carl Sagan)
S-185. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding past corporate pitfalls and human nature in general
S-186. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding article on FTL and "tunneling"
S-187. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more technical discussion on FTL, ZPE, anti-grav
S-188. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding latest e-mail correspondences
S-189. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding misc. Scientific American articles
S-190. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL comments on Michio Kaku's reponses to questions
S-191. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL reflecting on attitudes and motivations of others
S-192. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL responding to Bob Drake's memo
S-193. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding MQT and Josephson's Junction mechanisms
S-194. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a past letter sent to Carl Sagan
S-195. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding future discussions with Dr. Michio Kaku
232
S-196. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding postings of breakthroughs at the Los Alamos website
S-197. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing UNITEL's book
S-198. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing specifics on UNITEL's book
S-199. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding another corporation interested in UNITEL
S-150. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding consulting inquiry with Dr. Fred Alan Wolf
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: RE: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
Date : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:28:43 -0800
>At 01:20 PM 1/3/02 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>> Hi Larry,
>> Certainly I am open to hearing about your work in a non-disclosing professional
consulting arrangement. I wasn't soliciting from you in any way if my email gave you that
impression. It's just that I seem to have enough to do these days since writing, designing
PowerPoint Multimedia, and public-speaking fully occupies me. However, I would certainly
be available to listen. But you may find me a bit annoying since I ask a lot of questions when
I don't understand something. My consultation fees would run around $250/hour.
>> Best Wishes,
>> Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D.
>> Have Brains / Will Travel
>> 435 15th Avenue Apt. 3
>> San Francisco, CA 94118-2828
>> email [email protected]
>> telephone/fax/modem (415) 387-3100
>> http://home.ix.netcom.com/~fawolf
>Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:28:21 -0800
>To: [email protected]
>From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>Sounds great, Fred!
>BTW, check out http://www.physics.ucla.edu/class/01F/250_Rosenzweig/notes/pondero.pdf .
Very similar to our proposed plasma.
> This is the same advanced wave mechanics that I want to describe in presenting our proposed laser
plasma that produces the adiabatic pressure and stress energy tensor field through trapped
biexcitonic gasses within the projected potential (true RGB) EM wells. The dielectric force and ZPE
will split the whole ship/field into N and S monopole fields on a Macro level.
> Mike and I look forward to coming down there fairly soon (within the next 6 weeks). Let's stay in
touch.
233
>Best,
>Larry
S-151. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more plasma related articles
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: TAP-TEN yGroup
Date : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:51:08 -0800
At 01:06 PM 1/3/02 -0500, you wrote:
> Your friend Bryan's T.A.P.-T.E.N. has a Yahoo! yGroups at =>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tapten . It has some interesting messages covering
everything from time-travel to UFOs to pyramids to ZPE. I haven't come across Sarfatti yet.
But I did see someone quoting your ol' buddy Dr. Greer .
Mark:
Also check out "Nonlinear Wave Interactions in a 2-Electron Temperature Plasma", "Weakly
Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas", and especially "Electron Acceleration by
Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas".
But above and beyond this, from our good old American research friends from UCLA check out
Prof. John Dawson's "Plasma Beat Oscillator". More BANG for the buck!
Larry
S-152. from Jack Sarfatti forwarding actual working hardware and UFO theories
From : Jack Sarfatti <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: Your query on propellantless propulsion - warp drive
Date : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:23:40 -0800
John Schnurer wrote:
>Howdy Jack,
>
>As a small question:
>
>Who in your opinion is close to -- or has and can show with hardware -- any modification of
Inertia or Gravity and who can show Propulsion without using reaction mass.
>
>Thanks,
234
>John Herman Schnurer
"Hardware"? No one. I was talking strictly theory.
We at ISSO had one "hardware" project in this area that was a "maybe", but not really. I never saw
the math details and the chap was a John Nash type for sure (ref: film "A Beautiful Mind"). I mean
with a high IQ. He has something that worked on a very small scale although not by any stretch of the
imagination would it be a "warp drive" (more like a "tractor beam"). It is all classical microwave
electrical engineering and I doubt it will work as advertised (i.e., scalable to large devices). The physics
does not go deep enough. All Classical EM no gravity as far as I could tell. I did not see detailed math.
But that is my educated guess.
>> Jack Sarfatti wrote:
>> Me -- and only me -- to my present knowledge. Read my book and my recent papers.
>>
>> http://stardrive.org/Jack/Book.pdf
>> http://stardrive.org/Jack/Physics101.pdf
>> http://stardrive.org/Jack/Cosmo1.pdf
>>
>> It should be quite obvious to anyone with even a modest understanding of General Relativity.
I could be wrong, however. I have seen no other model that even comes close while remaining
integrated seamlessly with the rest of mainstream Physics. Certainly not anything by Hal
Puthoff, Bernie Haisch & Co. They have thrown the baby out with the bathwater.
>>
>> I know exactly where they went wrong. They neglect the coherence mechanism of
spontaneous broken internal symmetry of the vacuum required for Classical space-time to come
into being in a quantum phase transition. There is no incoherent classical limit to quantum
gravity. There is, however, a coherent Macroscopic quantum limit that gives our Classical
universe with us stuck in it like Edmund Abbott's "Flatlanders". Hal P and Bernie H et-al fail to
grok this delicate balance on which our existence hangs precariously -- i.e. the "Ice 9" problem
(Kurt Vonnegut).
>>
>> My second "technical" book Super Cosmos will have a lot of details not in my first book
Destiny Matrix (which is essentially autobiography and biography by others for the historical
record). My criteria are strict.
>>
>> 1. Propellantless propulsion must not contradict any of the known energy-momentum
conservation laws in standard mainstream Physics.
>>
>> 2. It cannot violate Einstein's principle of Equivalence and throw away tensor calculus like
Hal Puthoff proposes. In particular, one cannot use a local Classical vacuum gravitational field
stress-energy density tensor as in the Yillmaz theory that Hal P is so fond of.
>>
>> 3. The unconventional flying object "UFO" (in the sense of Paul Hill's nice little flying saucer
engineering book) must self-generate it's own locally controllable timelike geodesic with small
local tidal forces. That is, the machine and all its contents are on a self-propelled "LIF" (local
inertial frame). See John Archibald Wheeler's "A Journey into Gravity and Spacetime" for
background. Alcubierre's "warp drive solution" has this property, BTW. The ISSO "hardware"
project(s) did not.
>>
235
>> 4. The new theory must be a clear covering theory of Einstein's 1915 geometrodynamics and
its Kaluza-Klein and supersymmetry generalizations to the "Super Cosmos" of many "brane
worlds" as explained in "The Universe's Unseen Dimensions" Aug 2000, Scientific American,
Hyperspace by M. Kaku, The Universe in a Nutshell by Stephen Hawking, e.g "O Brane New
World"
>>
>> 5. The relationship to Quantum Physics must be worked out in detail. In particular the role of
the Zero-Point Energy fluctuations of all of the dynamical force and source fields. For example,
gravitating positive Zero-Point Energy fluctuations are opposed by repulsive anti-gravity
quantum pressure three times larger! (p. 25, Cosmological Physics by John Peacock). Puthoff
completely neglects this and does not seem to be aware of it. Neither does Paul Wesson mention
it in his CIPA review paper on the very subject! This is a very serious omission from
mainstream Physics.
>>
>> 6. The space-time stiffness barrier must be broken.
>>
>> i.e. 1 fermi bend per 4 billion metric tons equivalent of applied stress-energy density (i.e.,
"Feynman's number" in his Cal Tech Lectures on Quantum Gravity).
>>
>> 7. Relation of the new covering theory to both "dark matter" and "quintessence" (repulsive
vacuum energy speeding up the expansion rate of the Universe) must be patently obvious.
>>
>> Only my theory addresses all of these points. Eric Davis (on NIDS website) in his MUFON
2001 paper on UFOs and StarGate physics completely skirts these all-important issues and gives
a false impression that Hal Puthoff's PV model is a viable explanation. It is not at all, IMO!
S-153. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Magnetized Plasmas
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Magnetized Plasmas
Date : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:09:20 -0800
> Major Research Interest
> I. Physics of Dusty Plasmas: New collective effects in weakly and strongly coupled dusty plasmas
have been found. For example, we have discovered the dust acoustic wave (Planet. Space Sci. 38,
543, 1990), the dust ion acoustic shock (PRL 83, 1602, 1999), dispersion properties of a dusty
plasma containing non-spherical rotating dust grains (PRL 84, 2626, 2000), the parametric instability
of dust lattice waves in a turbulent plasma sheath (PRL 84, 5328, 2000), and the wakefield (PLA
203, 40, 1995; PoP 3, 1770, 1996) for charged dust grain attraction, while the parametric instability
theory contributes to the understanding of the observed "sublimation" transition of the plasma crystal
from a solid to a gaslike state. Furthermore, the DAW, the DIA shock and the wakefield have been
observed in experiments. Our dusty plasma work has relevance to cosmic physics as well to lowtemperature laboratory dusty discharges and to molecular clouds.
>
> II. Neutrino Plasma Physics: A new whole subject has been opened by investigating the nonlinear
interaction (PRL 83, 2703, 1999; Phys. Plasmas 7, 2166, 2000) of neutrinos with plasmas. Thus, we
have solved many astrophysical problems (viz. the generation of magnetic fields in the Early
236
Universe and on the surface of a neutron star, the generation of inhomogeneities in the Early
Universe (Phys. Plasmas 5, 2815, 1998), supernova explosions, the origin of gamma ray bursts, etc)
in terms of the nonlinear neutrino plasma coupling involving collective interactions (Plasma Phys.
Control. Fusion 41, A699, 1999). The collective neutrino plasma interaction work has been carried
out in collaboration with Professor Hans Bethe and John Dawson of the USA.
>
> III. Nonlinear Waves in Geophysical Flows: Various types of new nonlinear effects associated
with gravity, internal and Rossby waves have been identified. New nonlinear structures in
geophysical flows have been predicted.
>
> IV. Nonlinear Wave Phenomena in Astrophysical and Pair Plasmas: Wave-wave and waveparticle interactions have been studied in order to understand microstructures in pulsar
magnetospheres, and the propagation of cosmic rays in the interstellar medium. The focus was on
stimulated scattering instabilities of radiation and the formation of envelope solitons.
>
> V. Theories of Parametric Instabilities: We have developed theories for numerous parametric
processes in uniform and nonuniform plasmas with and without an external magnetic field.
Applications to ionospheric modification and laboratory experiments involving high-frequency
heater and microwaves have been considered. The results also have applications in Astrophysics.
>
> VI. Theories for Finite Amplitude Envelope Solitons: We have presented theories for the envelope
solitons (PRL 36, 968, 1976), non-envelope solitons, and double layers. The results have been
applied to the understanding of nonlinear wave phenomena in space and laboratory plasmas.
Recently we have presented theories (PoP 6, 1677, 1999; ibid. 6, 4120, 1999) for nonlinearly
modulated dispersive Alfven waves which are observed in the Earth's ionosphere/magnetosphere as
well as in the Solar corona. Our most recent works (PRL 84, 4373, 2000 and GRL 27, 89, 2000)
provide nonlinear models for coherent electric field structures in the magnetosphere as well as
auroral density cavities that are observed by POLAR, FREJA, and FAST spacecrafts.
>
> VII. Large Amplitude Waves and Fields in Plasmas are investigated. Here, various kinds of new
relativistic nonlinear effects are shown to exist. This work has applications to the acceleration of
charged particles in space and astrophysical plasmas.
>
> VIII. Nonlinear Convective Motion in Plasmas: Linear and nonlinear convective cells and
magnetostatic modes have been investigated. The calculation of thermal and non-thermal test
particle cross-field transport has been carried out. Our results are applied to the understanding of
anomalous transport in space and laboratory plasmas.
>
> IX. Plasma Turbulence and Plasma Vortices: A calculation of cross-field diffusion and the a.c.
conductivity of a turbulent plasma has been done. Model nonlinear equations for the study of lowfrequency (drift-Alfv'en, kink, tearing, etc.) turbulence in magnetized plasmas have been derived.
New instabilities in nonuniform magnetoplasmas were found. In the nonlinear analyses, we have
established cascading rules, self-organization, and chaos. Specifically, we have reported (e.g. PRL
41, 1656, 1978: Phys. Plasmas 5, 616, 1998) the existence of various types of vortices, which appear
frequently in in the Earth's ionosphere, magnetosphere, and extraterrestrial environment.
S-154. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding skeptics and lack-of-funding
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
237
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: Sarfatti's caustic comments
Date : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 21:01:38 -0800
At 06:31 PM 1/3/02 -0500, you wrote:
> I don't understand this guy. I mean, who died and elected him "God"? I acknowledge that
he has above-average smarts. But as I remarked to Dr. "Ark" (who never did respond to me
on this), where is this guy's Nobel Prize if he's so smart? He dissed Witten and Hawking.
But where is HIS Fields Medal? Where is HIS MacArthur Fellowship (the so-called "genius
award")? More importantly (as Jerry Decker of KeelyNet says), the name of the game is
actual prototypes or inventions -- not mounds-and-mounds of theories that are always
conveniently untestable.
>
> At first I thought it was a long-standing feud between you and him and I and anyone else
who came out on the side of UNITEL immediately drew his wrath (as if we were "clones" of
Larry Maurer). But now I'm seeing that he has absolute rage for anyone who doesn't agree
with him 100%. He's even picking on Murray Gell-Mann who won the Nobel Prize. I've
never seen anything like it. And I've been mentored by some pretty gifted people who have
plenty of patents themselves but never did rub anyone's nose in-the-ground. The bad thing
about him is he's attracted a cult following and some people -- who may have money like
Firmage -- probably are influenced by him too much.
>
> By-the-way, concerning the articles I've been sending you over these months, if you ever
find any of them that appears to back up your case in some manner (application, theory,
engineering, whatever), print it out and keep it in a notebook for ready reference. Then if any
investor says "that's a crazy idea", you can point to the same (or similar) things other people
are already doing. For example, the Tdimension company that's using a dye-based laser for
levitation …
>
> -- Mark
I agree with your feeling out the situation at hand. I just don't understand this guy [Jack Sarfatti]
along with several others that totally ignore the fact we have a patent. Especially a Japanese patent
where they are much more thorough in their technical review process.
The damage that is going on here is sickening. This new and wonderful technology in its delicate
and new condition is totally being forced to be developed by -- most likely -- foreign entities because of
this constant bickering, self-serving BS. It is obvious that the ill bidding going on is out of jealousy and
maintaining the same old NASA WWII technology rocket/oil power structure so their world domination
is not interrupted in our lifetimes. They want everyone to believe that our designs belong in the next
century and that our technology will disrupt Society etc.
I know Col. Tom Beardon and associates are giving it a go in the UK for whatever reason. I just do
not think that our fellow countrymen will further allow the draining of our valuable technology to
foreign countries if they knew what was going on. Do you? I know that you can see the value in our
efforts and support our efforts to build and test prototypes. I really believe this technical death grip the
Powers-that-Be have on control of TV and the news media that they are going to take us all down to
being a third world country. Reduced to playing cop with our forever-supported military.
With this technology, however, all of the Western hemisphere will be providing service to Asians
and/or European powers. As the jobs are disappearing one-by-one (especially here in Portland where
238
unemployment is the highest in the Nation), we Americans desperately need this technology to survive.
I want to throw up when somebody like Jack does everything in his power to cause foment and
disruption at a time when we need to unify together (like T.A.P.-T.E.N. is trying to do) to bring new
technology to fruition for the advancement of mankind to progress instead of regress.
We will try to stay positive in our endeavors here, Mark. We must depend on the power of truth
through presentation of facts, strength in the masses, and nurture technical progress to its rightful
fruition. That's about all we can do as I refuse to even acknowledge these negative entities anymore.
Regards,
Larry
S-155. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding my tactics of alerting Congress
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: things seem tough all over
Date : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 21:40:06 -0800
At 06:47 PM 1/3/02 -0500, you wrote:
> I was leafing through a National Geographic at the doctor's office. One article was about
current Russia. A large photograph showed a collection of some of that country's brightest
physicists in a makeshift informal Yahoo! type meeting, lamenting the lack of state- or
business-sponsored R&D funds. They all seemed to possess impressive credentials. We
need another war or space race. Maybe the ETs should invade us and jump-start our
economy!
>
> My "angle" with the Congress was to say (1) they can't stop you from selling a patent you
invented without signing any National Security oath, and (2) as an American I'd hate to buy
these inventions from a third-rate country when we could have developed them here all along
(hinting how would the voters like to learn about all who dropped that ball).
>
> I may have to come up with other "scare" tactics to use on non-governmental entities ...
>
> -- Mark
Yahoo, Mark! Nail 'em to the cross, buddy! Right now I am watching "Testing the UFOs" on the
History Channel. I was told today that Fred Alan Wolf was on one of the UFO History channel shows.
S-156. from Bryan Willoughby regarding building a demo prototype
From : Affirm Technologies" <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
CC : "BluEyes" <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: a little demo goes a long way
Date : Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:41:34 -0800
239
----- Original Message ----> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:47 PM
> Subject: a little demo goes a long way
>
> Bryan -> ... and before I forget, one thing I get constantly bombarded with is questions like "if it's so
good, why hasn't it been developed in all those years? Must be something wrong
somewhere." And these are coming from the most skeptical conservatives who unfortunately
have all the money.
>
> I asked Larry recently about his design. I know the interstellar thing requires some huge
lens. It's probably like trying to manufacture a large telescope mirror. But you don't need a
2-ft diameter lens to fit inside a PC-sized quantum computer. That's probably on the order of
LED if not smaller. He said that it would take $5-10 million to make a prototype 2-ft
diameter lens. How much would it cost to make the QC lens? $50-100K? That's something
more readily-financed and would prove the viability of the concept which has so many
detractors in even the "new" physics fields (like Saratti, "Ark"). But I never got a reply from
him on that.
>
> Like the old saying "it's easier to catch flies with sugar", something in hand -ANYTHING! -- goes so much farther than a ton of papers/documents/theories in attracting
investors. If money isn't available at the University of Chicago MBE lab, how hard would it
be to "grow" some crude crystals in a high school chemistry lab? Again, anything 'concrete'
is better than nothing!
>
> -- Mark
SERIES...I will report and reply in PARTS
Mark,
First, it varies upon the SPECS that make this LENS with dependence on APPLICATION.
ONE: I want them to use the method I have kept on applying in my communications. It's the fact the IF
you use the Synthetic CRYSTALLITE, then you are cutting your GROWTH time for MBE Process
about 85%. THEN SIMULTANEOUSLY, WE CAN BUILD the 1.4-year CRYSTAL from the
COMPOUND .....that will work the best in my thoughts ~
EVEN a QUANTUM MODULATOR for OPTIC Communications CAN be built Simultaneously for
little money~Bryan
THEN if you allow for the SIZE Variations, you will be Looking at the Point of perhaps 7 Microns and
2 Feet.
It's a matter of Importance to the FIRST PROTOTYPE
240
Being that NO one has ACTUALLY BUILT SUCCESSFULLY a PROTOTYPE for ROOM-TEMP
QC, then my thought would be DO that FIRST. Show the Quantum Effect while you create/show
APPLICATION of the Technology of the QC. Eventually everything CAN and WOULD be
Created/BUILT upon PROCESSES.
S-157. from Bryan Willoughby regarding his "Master Plan" for UNITEL
From : "Affirm Technologies" <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
CC : "BluEyes" <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: evolution of prototypes
Date : Sat, 5 Jan 2002 16:26:01 -0800
----- Original Message ----> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:28 PM
> Subject: evolution of prototypes
>
> Hi Bryan ->
> You must have done something, because the site is back up again!
>
> I first saw this posted at 'The Black Vault'. Another company called Transdimension is
proposing using their dye-based laser Asymmetric Gravitational Wave Propulsion System .
Their site is at => http://www.tdimension.com/projects.html . Apparently they already
have some existing products they are selling. I brought this to Larry's attention, and he said
he sent them a letter to see if they wanted to do business with UNITEL (although Larry was
certain his laser was far superior to their's). But the true significance of this is that a
company with an established product line (and appears to have defense customers) has come
out and said that anti-grav by laser is NOT science-fiction. I thought this would be a piece of
"evidence" that Larry could use on some of his critics. (A secondary piece of theoretical
evidence examining a link between plasma and gravity is at =>
http://www.goodfelloweb.com/nature/cgbi/index.html .)
>
> I've had some experience in the chemical industry watching projects grow into production.
Sometimes the designs are on paper with established and proven chemical and
thermodynamic models (e.g., how to design a heat exchanger, distillation column, fluidizedbed reactor, etc. -- much experimentation went into developing "canned" design procedures
that can be computerized). But other times a discovery is made in the laboratory. Say for
example a new catalyst is found by whatever means (theory, accident, ???). While initial
observations look promising, nevertheless a rigorous set of steps must be followed before
vast sums are spent to implement this discovery into a production unit. The catalyst is
produced in small quantities and tested in "batch" runs. Appropriate scale-up calculations are
made and it is next tested in a small steady-state "pilot plant" unit. If everything still looks
okay, then more simulations are done to scale it up to a commercial production unit.
>
241
> Although Szilard is credited with the idea of a nuclear chain reaction (supposedly by
watching traffic lights crossing streets in Hungary), many nations including the U.S. knew of
the concept. Everyone wanted to build an atomic bomb. But many skeptics abounded, some
saying that such a blast would ignite the earth's atmosphere while other saying a chain
reaction (the necessary "first step") couldn't be achieved. Enrico Fermi and his team
undertook the building of the first crude atomic reactor under the University of Chicago
stadium. For a while it looked like the skeptics were right. Fermi couldn't get a sustained
reaction. Other countries discovered the same thing and gave up. Fermi persisted. He found
the success was an ultra-pure form of graphite (that was used as a "moderator" to slow the
neutrons down to increase the nuclei "cross-sections"). After he arranged to have this stuff
made specially for him, he was able to achieve the first controlled chain reaction. Then it
was full steam ahead for Oppenheimer & company and the Manhattan Project. von
Neumann suggested a chemical IMplosion to generate a critical mass. Fermi already proved
that it was feasible to artificially produce a chain reaction.
>
> In UNITEL's case -- from the limited knowledge I have -- everything is based on Larry's
engineering experience and a close-up observation/examination (of some sort) of a UFO. No
lab work even on a small rudimentary scale has been done at all. And the first prototype
seems to be some very expensive unique semiconductor lens that will take over a year to
make. And to boot even he admits that he & Mike are guessing at some of the physics while
his detractors (like Sarfatti) are saying their knowledge of physics says it can't work. Even
with Rolls-Royce, they were going to fund the manufactur of only a very small surface of
UNITEL's smart-skin. But Larry seems to be taking a route (going from CA drawings with
no proven physics to a production-sized unit with no intermediate steps in between). I can
understand why this might scare off conservative investors ... that's not normally how things
are done. That's why I was suggesting producing something much smaller (that would say
take a month to "grow") that could substantiate the viability of his convictions and thus prove
the concept to the doubters.
>
> But there might be parts of the complete story that I'm not privvy to. I learn more each
time I receive an e-mail from you or him. And that's fine. I'm just pointing out the 'obvious'
to me and anyone on the street. By-the-way, I nearly crapped when I read Fred Wolf would
aid UNITEL in its battles with Sarfatti and others for $250/hour. For that rate, he should be
able to walk-on-water and kill with Zeus-like thunderbolts! It'd be cheaper to buy Mike a
laptop, get him an AOL account, and let him respond to Sarfatti's caustic e-mails and give
Larry a much-needed break. Bring in Dr. Wolf only when UNITEL is having problems
generating the B-E effects on a test unit.
>
> That's all for now. Hope your trip is off to a good start. At the TAP-TEN yGroups site, I
noticed where an upcoming conference was set for November of this year in Las Vegas. SO
far UNITEL and the Russian inventor are scheduled to appear. Are you working on getting
others? You might arrange with Glenn Campbell (http://www.ufomind.com ) to conduct
some Area-51 tours.
Hi Mark,
BIG PICTURE & DETAILS :
THE BOTTOM LINE for BUSINESS is that we have to be WELL ORGANIZED with a Productive
Plan of Action that will Catalyst the Documented Test Results in a Fortress of VIABLE PRODUCTS.
In the event that things don't go so positive for our results, we need to be certain that we're not out a
242
fortune before we begin any production for Mass Manufacturing exotic (today) application products.
These Strategic Operations will NEED to be COHERENT even if we ARE working in QUANTUM!
Enjoyed your email contents. See, Mark, it's what I have remembered to mention and reinforce all
along to 'Team Unitel' for the last three years. (I knew there was no way they could go anywhere
anytime soon if there's no GUIDANCE TRACK of Elemental Testing Series and Backing of Result
DOCUMENTATION.) You have got to gain some respect in the Physics community and stop battling
over things that don't matter any way. Sarfatti (and perhaps others like him) is NOT the way to go into
Physics communities to gain position. You need to SHOW Your Proof!
The only way I know how to do that is to gain some very Preliminary Funding ( we have that in my
work being done today) selling of Initial Shares...( some of the shares have been sold, but that's not
enough to come through with what we need for Lab work as that was just 'absorbed in paying for their
living and corporate and Intellectual Property protection). We must conduct HO-Scale experiments (as
you mentioned) such as a Scalable miniature lens (whatever will prove the theories and ideas) for
conducting their initial ''LAB"" Experiments. Make some Test, Create Observable Findings, Document
them in an intense series of Test/Results (including Publishing Whitepaper) Improve through the
batteries of test on the miniature scale.
Then once they are assured of their Capabilities from there through Intense TESTING/Documented
Results, exercise the right for a line on Secondary funding and then -- and only then -- conduct the UIC
build-out of the To-Scale Lens, Flat First, and the process is Repeated from the First Initial Test
Batteries.
Then once that is complete, continue to DOCUMENT and WHITEPAPER the Whole Project while ,
at the same time reach out Strategically through the Physics World and get together more (SUPPORT)
alliance to their findings. Bring this position forward through Conferences and, again, continue to gain
support while still allowing the Lab (UIC or Designated) to continue the Growth of the Crystal at Larger
Scale. Still probably not the Parabolic one -- that is for the FULL-SCALE one for Aerospace.
I believe we would good to produce for the HOLO-1 initially through all this effort yet show the
results by Applying Series of PROOF SETS of much Smaller Prototypes. Several prototypes are
definitely common to INVENTION.
SECURE A TOP-NOTCH MANAGEMENT TEAM. PRODUCTION can only begin when we
KNOW that what we have and can be MASS PRODUCED.
I personally would like to see UNITEL Team position themselves with some very "out of the box"
Investment Team. That's the people that I know in this domain that want to see Invention like this come
out to be Marketable on a Global Scale with Distribution Channel/Network Centers. We're speaking
more in the lines of the QC and other Application Products that can be created such as Communication
Products such as a Quantum Modulator.
Also, in the whole while of all this effort, I believe we better keep our gauged eye on the
Competition and others coming through with Invention of this Magnitude. Personally, I know several
groups that are in the same area. I have spoken to a couple very private entities that would like to
partner in a Project together once we get ORGANIZED and know which way we're heading.
Mark, there's no way ANY investor is just coming in here and lay down some CASH for this to
come about. It's going to have to stand on its MERITS.
243
And you are not at all out of line about the FACT that LARRY and MIKE are no CORPORATE
TEAM today. This is going to have to be! PLAY YOUR PARTS and let OTHERS come in and RUN
THE SHOW. THEY are Engineers and Physic- minded. Which is PERFECT! YOU can't BE
everything. That's why there's TEAM CONCEPT initiatives that must be actuated.
Much more later. You already know that there's not way you and I have to ''preach'' this around the
circle. Believe me, they KNOW there's no way to do this without a PROPER ORGANIZED EFFORT!
They are just talking right now. That's good. But that is NOT enough.
We're GOING TO HAVE TO BE METHODICAL about EVERYTHING.
NOW just between you and I, I already know a way that you don't have to GROW a CRYSTAL to
MANIPULATE these Quantum Fields. I have mentioned this several times to LARRY (not Mike at
first ) and Larry just goes right through that with his SAME STORIES) and I am just fed his knowledge
over and over. So I know not to try convincing them. I don't want to try that.
When it is the right moment, I will then actuate my Integration Method and we'll be bypassing the
Growth aspect once it is aligned properly and naturally with their methods. It's simple. I don't even get
over-involved with their Stories. I listen politely. If in case that they decide not to even go it my way
for a Test, then I am naturally at knowledge in hand to bring it to Fruition away from this UNITEL
Project.
Remember, there's a place for everything. Like you have been there testing to the gills and
reassuring in every measurement. We know this is necessary or you are not with Valid Proof.
However, I will state here that there's no sense in trying to CONVINCE everyone. You just perhaps
have to SHOW the Majority and that will take care of the Masses.
Hey, I really don't discount neither MIKE and LARRY. It's their position to do things their way.
We just have to FIND A FIT! WE CAN DO ALL OF THIS WITH GOOD ORGANIZATION
PLANNING and PATTERNS.
Mark, I have several theories and also more inventions/methods ... one, two, three ... Tey will all see
Daylight from my Autism work to my Compounds in Physics methodologies. It's nothing like just
"keeping it stored all your life". TESLA (and other similar inventors) at least -- even with all the
Interference (he didn't know business world methods) -- he STILL made for a UNIQUE difference in
this Earth's inhabitants' present and future inventions.
Regards in kind,
~bryan
S-158. from Bryan Willoughby regarding more thoughts on organizing a true "team" for
UNITEL
From : "Affirm Technologies" <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: you're the man with the PLAN !
Date : Sat, 5 Jan 2002 18:44:59 -0800
244
----- Original Message ----> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 5:05 PM
>Subject: you're the man with the PLAN !
>
>Bryan ->
>Finally! I've finally heard from someone who knows the cold hard facts of the business
world. As much as I like Larry -- and my heart is convinced he's not making any of this up -still it would be difficult for others to come to his aid when a logical mind says
"extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof".
>
> Actually I more agree than disagree with Sarfatti, Kaku, Witten and the rest. It's just
Sarfatti's personal demeanor that really turns me off. The only thing more worse than asking
a dumb (in his mind) question is NOT asking it all. Which is his way of brow-beating
people. I do think at times these mainstreamers don't "push the envelope" so-to-speak for
fear of damaging their reputations and cushy teaching positions.
>
> It's only natural for us to seek out peers to discuss our ambitions. I can see why Larry likes
to go into physics groups and post to get comments. I used to be a semi-pro roller-skater and
I would hang out with that crowd all-the-time. If I were into NASCAR, I'd probably spend
most of my free time in garages or shops that sell customized car equipment. Tom Mahood
(whom I like but criticize for not having more of an 'open mind') said he looked into Larry's
claims a couple of years ago and couldn't decide "if he was a sincere crackpot or a smart con
artist". When you talk-the-talk but can't walk-the-walk, you're really leaving yourself wide
open for attack.
>
> Personally I would have thought it would be a more mature approach -- and certainly one
that I would expect from the giften people I've worked with over the years at Carbide and
DuPont and even in college -- if Sarfatti, Mahood, and the rest would have said something
like "your guesses at how the physics work are severely lacking in our estimate, but we don't
necessarily say your device cannot work like you claim". I did finally get that admission
from Dr. "Ark" when he admitted that Mike does seem to "know all about physics" and "I
wish them luck. No kidding!" I relayed that admission to Larry but never heard anything
more about it. He and "Ark" apparently had previous battles on an old eGroups anti-grav
site.
>
> Anyway, Bryan, your last batch of e-mails was the first hint of anything I've seen so far
that could be perceived as a PROFESSIONAL plan. And by this I'm not taking anything
away from Larry or Mike. It's like you said -- assigning individual strengths and talents to
form a team. That's why my entreprenurial photo/music business failed because I had to do
everything including things I'm just not cut out for.
>
> I live in south-central West Virginia (Charleston) which borders Virginia, Ohio, and
Kentucky. Let me know when you're going to be near in the future ...
>
> -- Mark
Mark,
245
Excellent take on things, Mark. There's a fine line between Debating, Relating, and Exacerbating.
Point is: Exactly, that there's a need to ASSIST PEOPLE that come around like MIKE (PHYSICIST
TOUCH) and LARRY.
Here's my take on this. IF Sarfatti (I totally agree about him. I don't waste time on his efforts, and in
my perception he WASTES the PRECIOUS Life Energy that he breathes on 75% Bad Attitude) When
he and OTHERS could be ASSISTING someone like MIKE AND LARRY or at least offer him a PATH
to Follow that proves the greatest chance of success.. OK, I certainly don't want to continue giving to
one another back-and-forth, <stealthskater>, as you already realize the situations that you SEE on the
Web Forums .. and when we both realize the SHORT FALLS that are all around this UNITEL
Challenge/Vision.
NOW, here's what OUR PLAN OF ACTION CAN BE …
GET Larry and Mike together in a Conference, Person-to-Person. (Yes -- I have had my visits. But
they were NOT what I call GREAT PLANNING as I didn't try to take charg e. And they didn't even
come CLOSE to engaging on something with STRATEGICS. So I decided to NOT allow that Wasted
time. I worked on some other projects while they were dancing in the stories...)
ALLOW them to UNLOAD their Armor at the door. Let go of the "going to beat someone else at
the crap table" and UPLOAD a WELL-ORGANIZED BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS STRATEGIC
PLAN. KEY. FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THIS PLAN -- as IMPLEMENTED -- with ONLY
necessary changes according to Well Documented Facts and Figures.
FIRST - PLAN. SECOND - ACTION.
It's that easy. All the other DETAILS are just that. LARRY and MIKE have from what I have heard
... come through with some good meeting planned ... and come OUT with a non-performing
representation. They can and have to GET ON TRACK. That's the BIGGEST problem so it HAS TO
BE DONE WITH METHODICAL PLANNING AND "DISCIPLINE". I know you would have to
agree, Mark.
Oh, and I have some business to take care of in KY. So when I get my itinerary, I could advise you
of such and perhaps you could see to meet me perhaps on the way between your place and mine
location. That would perhaps work to save some time. Up to us, though, to make it work.
Mark, I am an Engineer and a Entrepreneur. Also, I have led several companies to successful
ventures from ground-up. Been there and still doing 'that'.
Thanks for the EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION, Mark.
We got a LOT to do. But there's NO limit to what we are Capable of with PROPER Planning.
I LIKE YOUR THINKIN ! Hey, by the way Mark… you can probably tell that I have a postMilitary background. And for me, it does indeed help me devise plans of actions and filter through the
wasted elements. It came from some of my Special Forces operations. I don't rely on all the tactics as I
INTEGRATE those with my Engineering,Marketing, Financial Background, and Physics know-how and
ideas, invention s. My main theme in life is to do EVERYTHING I can to make a difference. PAY IT
FORWARD with my Full support, intestinal fortitude, and Visionary gifts.
246
It certainly seems that you have a passion to see that things that we might not can explain (or at the
least, explained) so that we may rise above the possibilities into the FULL USE of Our Collective Minds
through the UNIVERSE.
Best regards,
~bryan
S-159. from Bryan Willoughby regarding strategies on forging successful ventures
From : "Affirm Technologies" <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: what makes an "expert" ?
Date : Sat, 5 Jan 2002 19:12:20 -0800
----- Original Message ----> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:23 PM
> Subject: what makes an "expert" ?
>
> Hey Bryan ->
> It's funny how people can get defensive about their own convictions and complain that
their detractors are too biased. But when it comes their turn, they can have just as much of a
"closed mind". I picked up on one of Larry's sore points -- the mental aspect of the possible
relationship between the consciousness and the quantum universe. Actually I admire
Sarfatti's and Herbet's work here for attempting to formulate equations with numbers to
describe such an abstract concept. I tried to tell Larry there must be something 'here' because
of all the research and money that has been spent on U.S. and Soviet remote-viewing
programs. Dan Sherman was involved in a NSA "Intuitive Communications" program that
combined psi with a computer somehow. And I've seen Navy contracts that have been
copies and posted on the Montauk boards for investigating the effects of hyperspatial
geometry on consciousness as well as manipulating geometry to achieve interstellar travel.
Larry believes in the latter but pushes you away when you start talking about the former.
Like you I attribute it to "nobody's perfect" and engage in discussions he's most comfortable
with.
>
> The Inflationary Model of the Big-Bang theory has successfully beat back any other
contender for the past 2 decades (contrary to what my brother-in-law, a civil engineer but a
very conservative fundamentalist lay preacher would profess). But there is a new alternative
theory
(just
proposed
last
year
and
discussed
in
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Strings_1.doc ) . Using an entirely different
physics (the collison between parallel 5-dimensional universal membranes instead of
expansion of a infinitesmally-small point of infinite density), it produces the EXACT same
predictions of the Inflationary Model. It goes even further in saying that 2 drawbacks of the
former model -- the prediction of magnetic monopoles and gravitational waves, neither of
which has been observed -- is NOT necessary. The new model was made possible by
superstring theory and Witten's recent M-brane theory.
247
>
> The point of this example is that models and theories are just that. When they can be tested
and confirmed, they become a Law of Nature. Until then it's the best that our best can come
up with to "fit" what can be seen and observed and measured. Superstrings may well be
proven not to be entirely 'correct'. But no other single theory fits as much of the data while
adhering to all the necessary physical and quantum constraints and restrictions. I found it
exciting because it shows others are getting over their inhibitions about accepting the notions
of alternate dimensions (which may well be how UFOs travel through MQT). I'm not sure I
would go as far as that book "The Holographic Universe" and say everything is an aritifical
reality or whatever.
>
> I attached a document that contains some past e-mails I received. Talking about people's
prejudices and my-way-only, you'll find it an interesting insight into how some "experts"
think.
Mark,
This email will just be a follow-up and very brief to express my thoughts about everyone's IDEA is
Right.
IF...WHEN...(better!) everyone COMES together, not just the greatest people in SCHOLAR
LEAGUES) but that the OPEN-MINDED and PROVEN PEOPLE that have that ABILITY to SEND
NEW TECHNIQUES through MATCHED-UP TECHNOLOGY, MERGED with MEDICAL and
PHYSICAL and indeed SPIRITUAL POSSIBILITY, THEN and ONLY THEN will be FULL KNOW
the WONDERFUL IMPACT of CAPABILITIES of what it means to know TOTAL INTEGRATION
on EARTH-PLANE and Beyond. Perhaps even through tapping into the EXTRA-INTERSTELLAR
OUTSOURCES which might indeed SHOW their Abilities with Us when we're FULLY
RESOURCING Our TOTAL EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS and ACTUATIONS to PROGRESS
Beyond QUANTUM LEAPS.
Mark, I am prepared in several ways, from training through RV, BM, Hypnogogics, and other
external sources of measured device and influences of Future Probable events and Past occurences
(which is relative). Much is capable on these regions of universal connectivity. It strengthens
existentially when allowed to 'band' naturally in group methodologies. That is not the only heightened
way (as you know as even as I speak here). I have some (surely others do) really far-reaching ideas in
this area alone after so many years of applications and extraordinary research and uncovering. The
natural and future ''events'' (in my perception) are ALWAYS in RECORDING POSITION! : )
You know, the topic of STRING theory... That's one that I won't attempt to try to open too far on
this communications. You will understand, that I have so much passion in this area -- as well as several
many others -- that I would much prefer the challenge of communications in person. Something about
being IN TUNE with the Moment. But I enjoy reaching out to some of the Ppublished material at times
as I get yet another angle of perception through all of these events.
YOU, my friend, have a VERY diverse LIFE of EXPERIENCE TOO! ~cool to know we can relate
on many levels...
Best regards,
~bryan
248
S-160. from Larry Maurer forwarding a theoretical explanation of UNITEL's laser plasma
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Re: UNITEL Aerospace
Date : Sat, 05 Jan 2002 20:43:57 -0800
> At 02:09 AM 1/5/02 -0500, you wrote:
>> Dear Larry:
>>
>> It's good to hear from you. Happy New Year to you also! Thank you very much for
inviting me to visit Japan with you. To be honest, I have not made a final decision. But it's
unlikely that I will go.
>>
>> On one hand, I want to help you sell your proposal to Toyota so you will be able to
demonstrate your concept. I know you and Michael have put so much effort on this project
for such a long time. Your trip sounds a lot of fun also. I have no problem in translating
technical, legal and business discussions. I can be very useful a translator for you.
>>
>> On the other hand as I might have told you before, I do not fully understand your ideas.
Therefore I cannot explain it to anyone either in English or Japanese very well. I am not sure
if I can explain the physics experiment which I did with Raymond long time ago either. I do
not fully understand the relevance (and significance) of that work to what you are trying to
do.
>>
>> Larry, I really wish I could understand your concept better so that I can be of your help in
selling your proposal to Toyota. Last several years, I myself have developed a skill to sell
new technology to future customers and investors and get their upfront commitment to
develop specific products. So I fully understand what you are trying to do here.
>>
>> I had a lot of admiration for your perseverance. So I really hope you will succeed.
>>
>> Thanks again and best regards,
>> Aki
> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 19:23:44 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace
> Aki:
>
> Now that I have a bit of a breather, I thought I would give you a better idea of what we are
attempting to describe and the relationship of our proposed laser plasma and its monopole effects as
compared to the same monopole effects on a Macroscopic scale as you and Dr. Chiao produced with
optical fibers and RF waveguides. I realize that your work that you performed in this research
project with Dr. Chiao was to measure the monopole effect and that you may not totally understand
how we will produce monopole effect with our laser beam. Anyway, to satisfy your curiosity, here
are some useful pointers for you to look at:
249
>
> Wave Collapse
>
> Wave collapse is a most exciting phenomenon of plasma physics -- first predicted in a seminal
paper by the Russian scientist V.E. Zakharov in 1972. Using a fluid description of a thermal plasma
and distinguishing sharply between slow and fast dynamics, Zakharov derived 2 coupled differential
equations which describe the nonlinear evolution of so-called Langmuir waves.
>
> The Zakharov model shows how Langmuir wave packets can collapse so that the electric field
reaches extreme values within a small region.
>
> Before the collapse is ultimately arrested (in our plasma) where the field might reach very large
values, and charged particles which pass through the field during the collapse can be accelerated. In
a real plasma, infinite fields are of course impossible. And it has been shown that the collapse is
sooner-or-later halted by wave-particle interactions. The electric field is thus prevented from
growing indefinitely to high energies. Before the collapse is ultimately arrested, however, the field
might reach very large values.
>
> Also, charged particles which pass through the field during the collapse can be accelerated. In
laboratory experiments, one has observed a "burst" or "flash" of fast electrons associated with
collapsing waves - producing a tail in the particle distribution. The phenomenon of wave collapse is
strongly associated with the so-called ponderomotive force. Before pursuing the concept of
collapse, let us digress with a brief look at this peculiar force.
>
> A charged particle bouncing in the field of a constant-amplitude wave will oscillate in a perfectly
periodic manner. If the wave is modulated, however, so that its amplitude varies with position, the
particle will experience a net force working on a time scale long compared to the wave period. This
is the ponderomotive force which can be derived by taking the time-average of the force on the
particle caused by the wave field. In the 1-dimensional case, the ponderomotive force is given by
>
> F = - q*q/(4*omega*omega)*d(|E0|*|E0)/dx
>
> where "q", "omega", and "E0" are respectively the particle charge, the wave frequency, and the
electric field amplitude. The asterisks denote multiplication. Note that the force increases with the
gradient of the electric field energy density but decreases with the frequency.
>
> Our proposed super-dense projected laser plasma will produce the same ponderomotive force
through oscillation of the projected buckets in the laser plasma. Please review the following url:
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/class/01F/250_Rosenzweig/notes/pondero.pdf .
>
> This is the same advanced wave mechanics as described in our proposed laser plasma that
produces the adiabatic pressure and stress energy tensor field through trapped biexcitonic gasses
within the projected potential (true RGB) EM wells. The oscillation of the projected EM wells
(buckets) from the projected end-point of the laser plasma back-and-forth with the phase conjugate
reflected buckets at the paraboloidically-curved free-standing red, green, & blue RF-activated (IIVI compound RF transparent high-temperature) glass crystallite laser superlattice lens. The
dielectric force and ZPE will split the whole ship/field into N and S monopole fields on a
Macroscopic level.
>
250
> Beyond producing an extremely strong magnetic attraction for our propulsion system, an
enormous amount of energy can also be produced (Boot Strap Effect). This directly relates to the
production of energy that T.A.P.-T.E.N. is interested in.
>
> Also check out: "Nonlinear Wave Interactions in a 2-Electron Temperature Plasma", "Weakly
Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas", and especially "Electron Acceleration
by Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas." Also from American
research at UCLA, check out the Prof. John Dawson's "Plasma Beat Oscillator".
>
> The first wavelet packets were constructed in summer 1989 by Meyer and Ronald Coifman in
Gstaad Switzerland, and Victor Wickerhauser and Stephen Quake at Yale. Loosely speaking a
wavelet packet is the product of a wavelet and a wiggle, an oscillating function. The wavelet itself
reacts to abrupt changes while the wiggle inside reacts to regular oscillations. In this case, the
project oscillating buckets are the wave packets. The trapped biexcitonic particles are the wiggle
inside. A true EM wave packet is produced via the RGB (255 lumens per) sections of the lens that
recombine as true "white", coherent monochromatic light.
>
> A basic criterion and constant factor for the design employed in our computer generated laser
plasma in N-dimensional vector space is a tuned equilaterally triangular lattice array. The
equilaterally triangular lattice is the ideal superconducting lattice for all acoustic-charge-photon
(hierarchy of beam constituents) interactions to take place. The RF field tailors all interactions on
both microscopic and Macroscopic levels.
>
> The polarized diamagnetic biexcitonic gas becomes very dense when confined in the projected
oscillating buckets. The confined oscillating excitonic gas particles (bosons) will form a BoseEinstein condensate with their particle spins aligned, generating a fiber bundle packet with parallel
transport within the projected buckets (for mass carrying purposes). The point-like projected
oscillating buckets begin to take on monopolar or particulate general vector potential -- both in
harmonics and dynamics -- with the faster moving excitonic particles confined in the relatively
slower moving projected, oscillating buckets.
>
> The projected oscillating buckets lie along the z-axis like beads on a string and are reflected back
with an increase in energy (see NASA Projects Ruby Falls and Epcot) from the point of collapse in
the projected laser plasma. This (longitudinal) collapse is due to Laurentz-Fitzgerald contraction.
As the projected oscillating buckets -- with an increase in energy-- reflect back towards the laser
lens, they are in turn reflected back precisely to the point of contraction by a phase conjugate mirror
(PCM) signal at the surface of the lens where another bucket is kicked-in the projected plasma, in a
precisely timed fashion.
>
> This oscillation of the projected buckets between the projected end-point and laser lens with PCM
reflection causes an "energy swing" witch creates an intense amount of energy that is built up in a
relatively short period of time. Due to the dielectric effect, the projected plasma renormalizes North
and South poles with positive and negative charges at either end of the projected plasma.
>
> The pulsing of the projected laser plasma (similar to "q-switching") produces an increase in
amplitude, affecting the overall probability of the projected field to produce a high gain in field
strength. The parameters of the projected sinusoidal, interiorly resonating compressed field are set
up by the distribution of RF field components in precisely clocked phase relationships accomplished
by computer modulation which also controls the overall field amplitude.
>
251
> When the bucket density is increased through PCM reflection/oscillation to produce left-handed
Larmor precession of the buckets, mimicking the rotation of frustrated overlapping wave sections of
closed Wilson loop plaquettes as found in a microscopic hadron string. High-frequency harmonics
create electrooptical effects such as the magnetooptical Faraday polarized states of photons.
Clocking controls the Larmor precession in odd-numbered precessing frustrations or half-twists.
These half-twists connect electric (three-parts) and magnetic (three-parts) through the six-tensor
projected coherent plasma.
>
> An intense amount of electric energy in a small amount of space:
>
> The feedback mechanism of collapse
>Consider a monofrequent wave which is spatially modulated so that its amplitude changes with
position. The ponderomotive force will then push electrons away from the regions of large
amplitude, and into regions of smaller amplitude. When the electrons are perturbed, an ambipolar
field is set up which causes the ions to move along with the electrons, so that the plasma remains
quasi-neutral. Thus the plasma density drops in regions where the wave amplitude is large, and
decreases in regions where the amplitude is small.
>
> If the wave is (e.g., a Langmuir wave) a lower hybrid or an upper hybrid wave, a drop in the
background plasma density implies an increase in the refraction index. From optics, it is known that
wave energy tends to focus into regions of large refraction index. The result of all this is a strong
feedback mechanism. Some-or-other mechanism initially modulates the wave field so that the
ponderomotive force pushes plasma away from large-amplitude regions. The refraction index
becomes large in the resulting cavities. Wave energy is focused into the regions of large amplitude.
The ponderomotive force is further intensified. More plasma particles are forced out of the cavities,
the refraction index of the cavities increases still further. And so on and so on until the collapse is
finally aborted by transit-time interactions.
>
> Research on wave collapse
>
> The Plasma-Astrophysics Group of the University of Oslo conducts research on various aspects of
wave collapse. We have looked at the dynamics of individual cavitons (collapsing wave packets) for
the case of Langmuir waves, upper hybrid waves, and other electrostatic waves in weakly
magnetized plasmas as well as for Langmuir-type waves in multi-temperature unmagnetized
plasmas. The wave dynamics has been modelled by partial differential equations which have been
integrated by so-called spectral methods.
>
> For wave collapse applications, spectral methods are among the fastest known and orders of
magnitude faster than self-consistent particle simulations. Many interesting results have been
derived, such as recurrent wave collapse where the caviton first tends to collapse, then expands for a
certain period, once more starts to collapse, etc. We have also performed extensive calculations on
the details of transit-time interactions inside wave packets. If you are interested in further reading on
our projects on wave collapse, take a look at some relevant publications, in particular the papers
entitled "Nonlinear Wave Interactions in a 2-Electron Temperature Plasma", "Weakly Nonlinear
High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas", and "Electron Acceleration by Weakly Nonlinear
High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas."
>
> Sorry the information is kind of rough. But this is the jixt of what we want to describe so that we
can (finally) construct and test our prototypes. I haven't got a reply from Kimio at Toyota. But we
will be able to converse just fine with Yoshinari and Kimio's assistance. Once we construct our
252
prototype and we are successful, perhaps you and Dr. Chiao may be interested in studying the effects
(along with the rest of the world physics community) of our patented laser and projected plasma.
Michael has proven his self time-and-time again with Ph.D-level physicists. And we are very
confident that our design works. Let me know if you have any comments on the material herein, etc.
and Mike and/or I will be very happy to respond.
>
> We will be coming to the Bay area sometime in the next 6-to-8 weeks to meet with Dr. Fred A.
Wolf, Ph.D physicist. Perhaps you may want to join us for a casual dinner meeting and we will
enlighten you to our progress as we will spend a couple of days on our visit. Good luck, Aki, and
again have a happy and prosperous New Year!
>
> Regards,
>
> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
> & Director, Engineering
> Unitel, Inc.
> www.unitelnw.com
> (503) 232-2740
S-161. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding ORMEs
From : "Laura Knight-Jadczyk" <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: attached sample document from the ORMEs search
Date : Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:36:14 -0500
On 28 Dec 2001, at 14:05, <stealthskater> wrote:
> The attached is a MS-Word conversion of one of the ORMEs' sites (to save you some time
in <link>ing to that site). It mentions Josephson tunneling and "laser-like" performance. I
have no idea of what they're talking about.
Plain nonsense and featured disinfo.
-- ark
S-162. from Bryan Willoughby regarding superstrings, Taylor Kramer, Tesla
From : "Affirm Technologies" <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
CC : "BluEyes" <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: Taylor Kramer versus superstrings
Date : Sun, 6 Jan 2002 13:18:04 -0800
----- Original Message ----> From: [email protected]
253
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 10:53 AM
> Subject: Taylor Kramer versus superstrings
>
> Bryan ->
> I had almost forgotten about this until we started talking about superstrings.
>
> Again -- for some unknown reason -- I just happened to catch an episode of "America's
Most Wanted" on tv. It comes on locally at 9pm Saturday, a time that I'm normally at a
skating rink. I don't know why I was home and just happened to watch broadcast tv that
night.
>
> It was a 'Missing Persons' segment featuring Philip Taylor Kramer, His story is at =>
http://www.mrkabc.com/news/kramer01.html . His father didn't come across like any
"crackpot" to me and reminded me of the type of professors I had in college. Apparently the
elder Kramer had developed a "theory of everything" based on the discoveries of Einstein,
Planck, Fermi and others. It proved so mathematically challenging that it was unsolvable for
decades. Reportedly the son had a revelation that solved more of "the Equation".
>
> I had tried to contact Ray Kramer through the author of the above article. He was
somewhat rude and offered no help. I did a web "White Pages" search for Ray (or Raymond)
Kramer in California and produced 4 numbers/addresses. But none of them had an e-mail
address. I didn't want to contact Professor Kramer if this would bring back painful memories
of his son's death. But I was very interested to see if he incorporated any superstring theories
in his equations or if they were of some new type altogether. In the AMW interview -- which
I copied onto videotape -- he mentioned using unstable gravitational waves for instantaneous
communication anywhere within the universe. In the above-referenced article another
revelation was made that hinted at actual physical teleportation. I don't know if this had to
do with "Star Chamber" type stuff or not.
>
> An addendum of sorts was added by conspiracist author Sherman Skolnick at =>
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Kramer_1.doc . It is his theory that Kramer did
not die because of his discovery but perhaps due to his involvement with the O.J. case.
Based on the "body language" of his wife Jennifer in the AMW interview, it seemed that she
knew more than what she was telling and I sort of got some strange feeling that perhaps
Kramer had a mistress on-the-side and a jealous husband did him in. But I have absolutely
NO basis for that and that could be 180 degrees from the real truth. When they found
Kramer's bones in the Malibu canyon, no explanation was given for how they were drug out
of his suspended mini-van and strewn over the grounds. In fact, it was very strange that no
more details or confirmations ever came out in public after the mini-van was discovered. No
suicide notes, no nothing ... very tidy and "convenient" .
>
> Just for your information ...
> -- Mark
Mark,
First -- I knew about Tesla's 'situation'. I'll explain that one in person with you when we meet.
You dig-up some interesting articles and connections when you put your mind to it, don't you?
254
Ah, you know what else? We have something much in common. Not that I am Pro or close to it.
But I have ALWAYS liked Skating. Roller, that is. Cool way to stay in shape too!
Will speak to you more about 'Kramer' etc when the opportunity arrives.
My idea is that string theory is not what the Universe's behavior is really about. However, any one
can draw their own conclusions and form a ''deeper perception'' -- dependent sometimes more on what
they read 'vs' what the observer 'first-hand'. ""Perhaps, everything we ever learn about life may or may
NOT be true. I always remember to keep that close in heart."' I am not much of a person with a
CLOSED mind. I love to be open-minded when it comes to Universal Knowledge OR "otherwise'.
Thanks for the sharing. You and I need (I feel strongly about this) to get together. Once this
business with my work is complete, I will come there. I just need to be 'done' with this little detail of the
'60K' I mentioned. I will somehow do this rapidly; I want to move onward. This is just a moment's
course of actions...that will lead into greater events happening...perhaps you will notice
SYNCHRONICITY in what I am expressing.
Here's ONE WISH. TESLA was SO aware! I wished that he would NOT have been so strapped,
''taken'' and alone in his quests for the Universe's Keys. He was NOT a Business operating individual.
And the PERSONS that he DID get involved with were almost every bit out to 'take' him right from the
beginning.
HIS STORY will be a Mystery till ONE day, it will be TOLD as it TRULY HAPPENED.
~FEEL THE MAGIC..
All the best,
~bryan
S-163. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding others who may be exploring similar
technologies
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: your e-mail to Aki
Date : Sun, 06 Jan 2002 17:25:36 -0800
At 06:41 PM 1/6/02 -0500, you wrote:
> Mr. Maurer ->
> What a weekend, huh? I had about the same type here.
>
> Judging from your letter to Aki, it certainly seems that your theses are well-founded in
theory. (I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who doesn't understand all the physics!) But
this stuff-- for as much as seems to have been written about it -- can't be a closely-guarded
secret. Do you think other agencies/companies are pursuing similar lines of research trying
to generate these room-temperature B-E effects either by using lasers or other means?
Maybe that's why the Air Force has taken a sit-back-and-see if you can move forward with
255
your ideas of how to achieve these events predicted-by-theory where their best efforts
continue to fail. Just a thought ... could be wrong, though.
>
> Regarding the interstellar vehicle, say for argument's sake you can make it hover and do
MQT. Since these other dimensions have never been "mapped", per se, how do you know
where to go? I'm thinking about the movie "Lost In Space" where they could "zap"
themselves out of harm's way but had no control over where they would re-emerge. Would
more of the superstring theory have to be developed to derive some functions which relate
these other dimensions to our 4-D coordinates? Would unmanned craft have to be sent via
MQT to "chart" these realms so some sort of navigational map could be formulated?
>
> -- Mark
Hi Mark:
Yeah, what a weekend! Last night I found the infamous "Plasma Beat Oscillator" creator Prof. John
M. Dawson of UCLA. Our buddy Paul Kirsch of UCLA Med School wrote me today announcing the
fact that Dr. Dawson died just this last November. Just my kind of luck exactly! I wrote Paul back
asking if he could find a grad student of Prof. Dawson's for us to correspond and perhaps work with.
Yes, we will be mapping our way to where we think the probability is good for habitable planets to
be at etc. with unmanned and manned vehicles. Just like StarTrek's "Enterprise", we "will go where no
man has been before". I know that UCLA & the U. of Oslo (wave collapse experiments) are very close
to our proposed plasma with similar effects etc. As you can see, we have a lot of "fence sitters" ready to
approve or deny the possibilities of our design. When we are successful (notice I didn't say "if" we are
successful) with our prototype testing, just watch those SOBs jump to want to get involved! 'Till then,
it's carefully said: "I am not sure I understand. But good luck...." blah, blah, blah and so forth.
This wishy-washy fickle crap is what we have been putting up with since day one! At least Charlie
Johnson (former Pres. of Boeing Aerospace) had the gonies to make a decision and take immediate and
positive action to meet with us because he found out that Boeing could instill a magnetized charge on a
laser beam. This is why if the investors balk this coming week, we are going gung-ho to complete and
publish our book ASAP. That will get the word out on all the facts and history behind us so that
somebody or organization will take the risk and go for it (i.e., build our prototype).
Apparently you have made your decision to commit to helping us out of careful thought and
consideration of weighing the facts presented. The same can be said from several associates and
supporters that are professionals and did the same scrutiny of our design. Why then can't these
damnable investors and the Feds make up their fickle minds? At least Sarfatti has made his mind up and
taken action on a negative note hoping we will fail (poor bastard!).
I shall keep you posted on what is going to happen or not happen this next week or so with investors.
best,
Larry
S-164. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding search for a student of UCLA's Dr. John
Dawson
256
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: UNITEL Aerospace
Date : Sun, 06 Jan 2002 17:26:11 -0800
> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 14:44:37 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Fwd: UNITEL Aerospace
> Paul:
> Here is the email I just sent to the deceased Dr. John M. Dawson. Perhaps you could find out who
one of his students is for us.
>
> Larry
>>
>> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 01:29:24 -0800
>> To: [email protected]
>> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
>> Subject: UNITEL Aerospace
>> Dear Dr. Dawson:
>> We would sincerely like to work with you concerning our patented proposed laser plasma
that is very similar to your work. Please respond as I firmly believe that you will be very
interested in our proposed project at UIC. I hope you will respond to this message as we hope to
hire your services in a consultation manner to assist in developing and testing our proposed
project. Thank you in advance, John. I can almost guarantee that you will thoroughly enjoy
taking part in our project. I hope to hear from you soon,
>> Sincerely,
>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
>> & Director, Engineering
>> Unitel, Inc.
>> www.unitelnw.com
>> (503) 232-2740
S-165. from Ken Myers regarding comments of others concerning ORMEs
From : Ken <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: received a response from Dr. Jadczyk concerning ORMES
Date : Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Hi -"Mainstream" folk tend to be rather narrow, eh. Look what they did to Velikovsky and Sitchin. The
movie "Contact" sums it up. And Sagan was one of the big detractors of Velikovsky.
257
My field is no less impacted (pun here). So we go on without their knowledge or support.
I have found that a version of the famous Einstein quote "Great minds have always encountered
violent opposition from mediocre minds" to be quite true. I would only change the last word in the quote
to spirits. Or may be being beneficent to personalities. HO HO HO!
Take care and follow your own path. I know that is the only way that brings peace and satisfaction.
-- Ken
S-166. from Bryan Willoughby regarding another Unification theory posted on KeelyNet
From : "Affirm Technologies" <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: another guy with yet another theory
Date : Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:24:16 -0800
----- Original Message ----> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:17 AM
> Subject: another guy with yet another theory
>
>
I
saw
this
posted
on
KeelyNet
on
Sunday
=>
http://maddsci.tripod.com/MIGATRAC/index.html .
Another guy claiming that
prominent physicists and cosmologists are missing the boat on forces of nature. In the end he
gives no real revelations but a teaser to buy his book and stock for some anti-grav project.
>
> -- Mark
Hi Mark,
I'm up and at it this almost afternoon! ; ) Yes, I think sometimes there's too much data marketing.
My theory: simply allow to document and prove what I know and learn continuously. And then only
when I have something ''ready'' to show will I publish those openly. Otherwise, only very tight circles of
communications. ~ ~bry
S-167. from Bryan Willoughby regarding an Australian inventor who's being sued by investors
From : "Affirm Technologies" <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: another bad publicity case for future technology investors
Date : Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:32:48 -0800
----- Original Message ----258
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:35 AM
> Subject: another bad publicity case for future technology investors
>
>
an
example
of
what
you
DON'T
want
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m11837.html
to
happen
=>
True true true ... Yes, I have heard of Brian. He's going to live on through everyone that touches
this Earth. Somehow we know that happens.
Well, that's my opinion. Some touch it more closer. But it all matters ...~bryan
S-168. from Bob King regarding other Montauk whistle-blowers besides the 4 most commonly
known
From : bob king <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : Re: any reliable Montauk sources ?
Date : Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:14:27 +1300
Hi ya Mark,
Thursday, January 10, 2002, 5:23:03 AM, you wrote:
> I'm debating a relative and another guy on the web about Montauk. Unlike Roswell and
the P-X, there aren't any investigators or whistle-blowers other than Nichols, Moon, Bielek,
and Cameron. All of them have been publicly discredited along with their reports. [in fact,
the
latest
damage
down
to
Nichols
was
at
=>
http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/montauk1.htm ] I wouldn't call John Quinn a
reliable source either because he seems to be too much of a conspiracy writer.
Most of them are so.
> …I can hold my own on Roswell and the P-X. There's been a wide variety of researchers
and personal testimonies …
Sure have. And I have my doubts if any of them have actually been there!
> … but I'm forced by lack of credible reports to admit defeat with Montauk unless I can
find some others to replace the above 4 principles.
I am sure you know more about it than I do. The only 2 things I really know about the place are that (A)
it was/is being used to work on developments of Tesla's work and that (B) it's in the middle of a 'national
park' (humph) with signs up around it saying trespassers will be shot! Sorry I can't be of more help.
-Regards,
259
bob
S-169. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail sent to an associate of Dr. Greer's
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:16:50 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Your aerospace applications
> Hello Jonathan:
> Thanks for your prompt reply. It is very interesting here because I met with Dr. Greer last July.
He invited me to a luncheon meeting here in Portland which I attended. Dr. Greer didn't have much
time to talk to me much about our business (UNITEL) because there were several individuals
demanding his attention along with us. Dr. Greer did express much interest in helping us get funded.
He asked for a business plan. Which I gave him. He told me that he wanted to develop a much
more professional business plan and was quite certain that he could fund us with "millions". I did
not hear from Dr. Greer since then and feared that he lost interest in us for whatever reason.
>
> I can say this, however. That Dr. Greer should be very pleased with our progress since we last
talked. We hope to construct our prototypes at UIC along with getting KHD started on our
magnetooptical software, Applied Sciences, and Flight Unlimited (including Dave Froning, Bob
Roach, Hal Puthoff and Dr. T.W .Barrett) started on our aerospace projects.
>
> We are also attempting to contact fellow associates and researchers at UCLA Physics laser
research Dept. of the late Dr. John M. Dawson who recently passed away (last November '01). They
have been performing research with very similar laser plasma beam devices similar to our patented
laser beam plasma. You may have heard of Prof. Dawson's "Plasma Beat Oscillator", a laser device
that produces a vast amount of energy. We also have been in touch with Akira Tomita who along
with Dr. Raymond Chiao (Cal Berkeley Physics Dept.) are world famous for producing monopole
effects with an optical fiber and/or an RF waveguide. We want to produce the same monopole
effects with our laser plasma as they did with optical fiber and RF waveguide.
>
> The old adage "build it and they will come" applies here as we firmly believe that once we
construct our prototypes, we will draw much attention to our project and acquiring further funds to
construct larger prototypes shouldn't be any problem. Aki has a very simple description of the
monopole effect by analogy to a "culvert pipe and bowling ball".
>
> We have been discussing formal contracts with Rolls Royce Deutschland in Berlin, Germany and
Toyota Motor Co.'s Aero-Business Dept. Business Development Division in Tokyo, Japan. We have
patents in these countries and are very familiar with the individuals managing the departments there.
We hope to be funded and continue with these International large, deep-pocket manufacturers for
business associates. We were awarded Number 59 out of the top 100 International Aerospace
companies for 2001-2002 and we hope to climb to the Number One spot in the next 3 to 5 years.
>
> This may be a great opportunity for your firm to get involved with our exciting projects with the
several universities we have under contract. I look forward to hearing from you and what you have
in mind from here on out. Tell Dr. Greer that he can call us anytime he wants. Or you can take over
as I know he is extremely busy. We also recently got Art Bell excited about UNITEL. He wants us
260
on his show because a friend of ours recently installed a radio tower at Art's residence in Las Vegas
where he had an entire afternoon to discuss UNITEL's exciting history and futuristic projects.
> Good luck, Jonathan. I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you,
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
> & Director, Engineering
> Unitel, Inc.
> www.unitelnw.com
> (503) 232-2740
> At 01:02 PM 1/10/02 -0700, you wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Larry. I have today responded to a letter from your associate Doug Starfield.
>>
>> We seek a testable over-unity or electrogravitic device that we can license if it passes
triple-vetted university testing.
>>
>> We are an early-stage startup. However, our founder and CEO Dr. Steven Greer has one
of the best rolodexes on the planet. He can literally pick up the phone and reach virtually
anyone of importance, either directly or through a contact's introduction. Several "household
names" in business and politics have given him assurances of whatever funding we require
once we have identified such a device. You may be familiar with Dr. Greer through the
Disclosure Project and its May 9, 2001 event at the National Press Club. Visit
http://www.disclosureproject.org for details.
>>
>> We already have seed capital in the six figures. If this kind of collaboration is of interest,
please advise.
>>
>> Jonathan Kolber
>>
>> PS--I have attached several documents that introduce us, our mission and our capabilities.
>>
>>----- Original Message ---->>> From: "Larry Maurer" <[email protected]>
>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:57 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Your aerospace applications
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Kolber:
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting us. It seems like what your firm has to offer is a > good
business fit for us as we hope to construct our prototypes that will > interact with the
ZPE. I will send you some materials. Please send us more info on Space Energy
Access Systems. Please review the attached business plan. Thanks.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
261
>>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
>>> & Director, Engineering
>>> Unitel, Inc.
>>> www.unitelnw.com
>>> (503) 232-2740
>>>
>>> At 11:59 AM 1/9/02 -0700, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have been referred to your aerospace applications web pages, but find
them blank. It is our understanding that you have technology for developing
electrogravitic (or ZPE-powered) craft. We are in a position to bring to bear some
very significant resources for the development and marketing of such craft.
Please advise if you have interest in exploring this further.
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan Kolber
>>>> Vice President, Planning and Product Development
>>>> Space Energy Access Systems, Inc.
>>>> 7501 Batesville Road
>>>> Afton, VA 22920
S-170. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding last minute touches to UNITEL's newsletters
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Newsletter
Date : Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:39:12 -0800
Attachment : NL-1.DOC (359k)
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:39:11
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Newsletter
> X-Attachments: C:\MYDOCU~1\NL-1.DOC;
>
> Paul:
>
> Here is a meaty one fer ya! Perhaps you can change and/or add to the short-/long-term goals on
each category to make them more different. Also I am wondering how to squeeze the small iset
picture that I have for "other" category add on the front page. Possibly leaving it blank may be the
way to go.
>
> Anyway it is set, ready for final edit. It looks great so far. Perhaps your final touch, Paul, would
do it. Check out the ode to Prof. Dawson. Need the birthdate the day he died (i.e. 1932 -2001) if
you can find it. Let me know any additions etc. you might have. Go ahead and just make the
changes, Paul. Also stick your credits in there.
>
> Larry
262
S-171. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding another abrupt shift of support from another
camp
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: trivia highlights
Date : Sat, 12 Jan 2002 01:55:41 -0800
Mark:
Check out attached final newsletter copy and inserted comments below:
Larry
At 07:11 AM 1/11/02 -0500, you wrote:
> One of the things I was not aware of was just how long it was going to take to manufacture
yours lens of 7-or-so molecules thick and 2 feet in diameter. I learned that from Bryan -over a year! Once they get that built, you better have the Air Force or U.S. Marshals guard it
en route from Chicago to California to have it permanently mounted in the titanium frame.
Then place armed guards around it 24 hours-a-day wherever its final resting place is.
>
> Unless it compromises a proprietary concern, little facts like that go a long way to helping
people understand why it's taking so long (in addition to the government scandal stuff).
Maybe you could insert little "Did You Know That ..." comments throughout the Newsletter
to add a sort of trivia flavor to it? Andrews did that in his Testors model kit of Lazar's UFO,
adding little text boxes of Lazar's comments throughout the step-by-step building
instructions.
Well, they say "sex sells". I, however, don't believe we have to do that. Our stuff is for real. We
had former U.S. Senator (Senior) & Head of the Appropriations Committee Mark O. Hatfield really
going to bat for us. And now you are sparking some interest once again in these circles. I shall not dirty
America's future. It's Greer's chance to take part in a real space program. Not some ESP phantom ship
deal.
BTW, Desmond Gary Dean (author of Bridge Across the Universe) called me today and said he
wants to help us. He wants to assist in the creation of movies and knows Mrs. Gene Roddenberry
personally. He is talking to her tomorrow. I am getting a copy of his book, too. Lots to do! We are
really getting some devotees now.
> Sorry ... I went right to your newsletter attachment last night without reading your cover
letter. You had already addressed the "Other" icon problem. I work from 6am-3pm and it
was going on 11:30pm last night when I responded to your e-mail. I was trying to figure out
why Boylan's site went down. I don't know if you know much about him. He passes on
some real whoppers. He accuses Bearden of inadvertently passing on disinformation, and yet
he has come under the same attacks. Neither of them are branded as deliberate, more as nice
guys led astray. Anyway, in Boylan's case, he lost his license to practice therapy as a
psychologist because of (1) leading some clients to believe they were being subjected to
263
"external powers" which were out of their control and (2) actually using therapy sessions
(like in a hot tub) to induce an atmosphere conducive to sex. That's what I read in news
reports about him on the Web. He always seemed up-front with me, though.
>
> Did you ever notice how many of these "whistle-blowers" like Boylan, Greer, Lazar always
have some failing personality trait or past deed which resurrects itself to "bite" them at the
most inopportune times? I used to wonder if the government recruits smart guys with
"ghosts" in their past that can be brought back to "life" if these guys ever get out-of-line.
Yeah, Mark. Check out the applecart BS I got from our man Greer & his crony Jonathan:
>> From: "Jonathan Kolber" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Larry Maurer" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Your aerospace applications
>> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:52:29 -0700
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
>> X-RCPT-TO: <[email protected]>
>> Larry,
>> Thanks for the newsletter. It is good to know you have met Dr. Greer. To me, he is
that rare individual with the leadership skills necessary to pull off the "impossible".
>>
>> While I admire your enthusiasm and confidence, I must express a concern. Dr.
Greer's experience (and some of my own) strongly suggestd that you will be opposed in
your efforts to "upset the applecart". The opposition can turn quite ugly. That's why
the major part of our strategic plan is focused on dissuading, or otherwise stopping,
such opposition. Right now, we are totally focused on identifying and licensing a
device that displays testable over-unity or electrogravitic properties. Do you know of
such? Once funded for our Phase II, we plan to begin exploring and researching more
widely.
>> Best,
>> Jonathan
S-172. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Dr. Steven Greer
From : Jack Sarfatti <[email protected]>
To : bruce maccabee <[email protected]>
CC : Art Bell <[email protected]>, dipshit moroni <[email protected]>, Doctor
Jibar Rish <[email protected]>, "Eugene F. Mallove" <[email protected]>, "Jeff
Altman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, tony moroni <[email protected]>, UFO
Files
<[email protected]>,
"[email protected]"
<[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Wes Thomas <[email protected]>, Yokatta
<[email protected]>
Subject : Re: UFO Disclosure Virus Attack
Date : Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:49:10 -0800
Attachment : C__DOCUME~1_User1_LOCALS~1_Temp_nsmailJ3.jpeg (71k)
> bruce maccabee wrote:
>
264
> IF Greer has his way all current energy systems will be replaced.
> HAHAHAHAHA! In case you didn't see this:
>
> These marching morons are also sending around e-mail viruses.
>
>>
>> ....................
>> Disclosure Project Email Update
>> 1-11-2002
>>-------------------------------->> Dear Supporters of the Disclosure Project,
>> The past year has been an extraordinary time for The Disclosure Project and the
world. We had the most successful and best attended press conference in 20 years on
May 9, 2001 at the National Press Club. The truth about UFOs, illegal covert projects,
and the promise of a new civilization made possible by the release of new energy and
propulsion systems … …
hogwash!
>> … was heard by over a billion people in the past 7 months. Thousands of people
have attended Campaign for Disclosure
events and a grass roots movement is growing to push for Disclosure. … … …
Lies! All lies from Danny Sheehan and his motley crew.
>> Thousands of letters were sent to dozens of members of Congress - and some have
begun to take the matter seriously and are even asking for affidavits from select
witnesses. Of course, the tragedy of 9/11 has dominated the media and Congress. But
at the same time it has underscored the folly of an unnecessary dependence on imported
oil as the main source of energy for America and the world. Increasingly, people are
beginning to understand the true high price of oil. We are in the process of
implementing a grass roots extension of the Campaign for Disclosure … …
AKA "fifth column"
>> … … by creating the official Disclosure Project Representatives program. Under
this program, people will be able to sponsor and conduct Disclosure Project town hall
meetings in their local area, showing either the May 9, 2001 National Press Club video
or the Disclosure Video. Through this effort, an unlimited number of people can be
empowered to spread the truth and organize locally for full Disclosure. Please check
the web site for updates on this which should be posted shortly.
>>
>> In other website news, we have a new guestbook up on the site which we would
encourage all of you to sign (if you haven't done so already) and get your friends to
sign. Some of our recent efforts have been focused on an outgrowth of Dr. Greer's 11
years of intense research into this subject. We have identified a number of prospective
civilian scientists and inventors who appear to have uncovered important new
electromagnetic energy and propulsion technologies. We have concluded that the time
has come to form an entity to definitively identify, test, disclose and mass-produce such
a device to replace the internal combustion engine and the need for fossil fuels. I have
265
no doubt that we now possess the strategic capability to do this once a bona fide
technology is identified and tested by independent facilities. To this end, Dr. Greer has
formed a corporation: Space Energy Access Systems, Inc. (or SEAS). This entity will
identify, test, secure, disclose, finance and produce systems to replace all current
energy sources currently in use. It will have a significant associated Foundation to fund
and support Disclosure, world peace, outer space relations, environmental protection
and the alleviation of human poverty and suffering.
>>
>> I would like to thank you for everything you have done to support The Disclosure
Project in the past year. It would have been impossible to accomplish the historic
events of the past year-or-two without your dedication, support and love. Now it is on
to 2002 -- yhe year the technologies behind UFO energy and propulsion systems will
begin to be released to a long-suffering world. God bless you and thank you for
everything! Sincerely, The Disclosure Project
The "UFO Disclosure Project" is a disinformation and misinformation project making fraudulent claims
about secret U.S. Black technologies that do not yet exist. The project needs to be investigated by the
Feds!
S-173. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Dr. Eugene Mallove
From : Jack Sarfatti <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Mallove's claims on "aetherometrodynamics" LOL ;-)
Date : Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:06:25 -0800
Attachment : C__DOCUME~1_User1_LOCALS~1_Temp_nsmailOA.jpeg (4k)
S-P & M-M Sirag wrote:
> Jack,
> I have looked at the context of the Correa equations (i.e., section AS2-10). The experiment
involved is in electrostatics using a gold-leaf electroscope (thus the term "gold-graviton" is
coined). The experiment is not actually described but some conclusions are drawn. As you
know, electrostatics is a very tricky area experimentally. I remember working with
electroscopes in my high-school physics class in Alberta. These worked pretty well because
the air in Alberta is usually very dry (especially in the winter).
> Without any details of their experimental set-up and methods, I can only wonder how they
controlled for moisture content in the atmosphere to prevent leakage of charge.
> I agree with you that their equations make no dimensional sense. We have better ideas to
work on than this.
Exactly. That Eugene Mallove could not see that instantly see that causes me to write him off as
credible source. I was quite surprised, actually. I had previously thought better of his technical
competence.
266
> I have looked at many of their pieces of writing on the AKRONOS website. They seem to
be at loggerheads with a host of people--especially the Reichians, although they base many
of their experimental ideas on Reich's experiments. Of course, they eschew the standard
ideas of physics, and claim to be creating a new physics, while using some terminology from
standard physics, such as "energy" and "graviton". So it's very confusing to read their very
verbose (but uninformative) writings. They have some patents. But I believe that patents
don't require working models. There are many things patented that don't really work.
>
> We have other fish to fry. I recommend that we leave the Correa people alone. Assuming
that they are wrong, they will fail--like many others we know about. It's definitely not worth
our time to argue with them :-)
>
> All for now.
Agreed. ;-)
I think that all the claims of the UFO Disclosure Project that the U.S. Government is "illegally" hiding
secret free energy machines and anti-gravity engines is complete Cargo Cult pseudoscientific nonsense.
>> Saul-Paul (January 12, 2002)
>>
>> From: Jack Sarfatti <[email protected]>
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2002, 12:21 PM
>>
>> to the above smaller list
>> Creon,
>>
>> Eugene Mallove has proven himself to be a crackpot with this
>> stuff. The LHS of this equation is claimed to be an "energy". I was quite surprised actually at
his low level of competence in >>elementary physics.
>>
>> I would like you guys to pipe in with your opinions on this specific issue. Do any of you see
anything sound in the above equation? Perhaps I am missing something? ;-)
S-174. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Sarfatti's comments (e-mail # 172)
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: Sarfatti on Greer
Date : Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:49:28 -0800
Mark:
Thanks for the info. I think it's hilarious about these guys and their disinformation service. It's sad,
though, that they have sincere followers that actually believe in them. I can't wait to get a technical film
with moving graphics along with interviews with researchers so the public can see with their own eyes
267
what we have and decide for themselves which one is the real entity: Us -or- Jack-ass "bait & switch"
policy he accuses others of performing.
Best,
Larry
S-175. from Bob King regarding email # 174 that included references to "Reichian" technology
From : bob king <[email protected]>
To : <[email protected]>
Subject : ref: forwarded e-mail from Sarfatti
Date : Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:52:15 +1300
Hi ya Mark,
> It's rare that I come across the name of Reich outside of the Montauk stuff. Yet I had
someone respond to me recently on that ORMEs stuff who said he remembers studying
Reich in graduate school while getting his Ph.D. in psychology. And then I saw Reich
mentioned again in the following e-mail from Sarfatti. Maybe the guy existed after all !!
Well, it does help if they are real ;-)
>> Subject: Mallove's claims on "aetherometrodynamics" LOL ;-)
>>
>> I have looked at the context of the Correa equations (i.e., section AS2-10). The
experiment involved is in electrostatics using a gold-leaf electroscope (thus the term "goldgraviton" is coined). The experiment is not actually described, … …
Typical. Probably just theory
>> but some conclusions are drawn. … …
Again typical. Have a guess and get everyone discussing something that never happened.
>> As you know, electrostatics is a very tricky area experimentally. … …
Correct.
>> Without any details of their experimental set-up and methods, I can only wonder how
they controlled for moisture content in the atmosphere to prevent leakage of charge. … …
Quite!
>> I agree with you that their equations make no dimensional sense. We have better ideas to
work on than this. … …
Agreed.
268
>> Exactly. That Eugene Mallove could not see that instantly see that causes me to write him
off as credible source. … …
Agreed.
>> I think that all the claims of the UFO Disclosure Project that the U.S. Government is
"illegally" hiding secret free energy machines and anti-gravity engines is complete Cargo
Cult pseudoscientific nonsense.
Debatable.
>> "What I cannot create, I do not understand." -- Richard Feynman
Bloody nutcase!
-Regards,
bob
S-176. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding new ideas to generate income
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: New Ideas
Date : Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:12:25 -0800
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:04:57 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Fwd: New Ideas
>
>> To: "Larry Maurer" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "Larry Maurer" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: New Ideas
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 00:35:52 -0500
>>
>> Message from Esmond Gary Dean.
>>
>> After I have review the past contract, we can work details for any contract with me. There
has a number of new Leggo toys based on people traveling to Mars. Meanwhile the Moller
International who created a toy based on their own real-life flying car. They show it on their
web site- www.moller.com Price $10. May be might be possible to sell toys based on the
aerospace vehicles and medical equipment prototypes. This might create another profitable
product lines just in time for Thanksgiving and Christmas.
>>
>> I have seen a serious article about faster-than-light drives hit the cover pages of Popular
Science and the Scientific American. The front cover of Popular Science says "Warp Speed Gets
269
Real*.We Thought It Was Science Fiction. Then We Visited NASA .*Sort of. If you wish I
could help articles for both magazines. You check them out on their Internet websites.
S-177. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Foreward to his book "Flying Colors"
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Foreword to our forthcoming book
Date : Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:54:08 -0800
attachment : Foreword.doc (43k)  [ Appendix: UNITEL_attachment_ S-177 ]
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:52:56 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Foreword to our forthcoming book
> Hello Gary:
> I just wrote a foreword to our forthcoming book entitled Flying Colors which is an autobiography
of myself and my co-inventor Michael E. Miller. I mentioned your name, book, and some short
statements into it that I changed to fit what I had to say. I need permission from you to put it in there
of course, so please review the "Foreword" and let me know if it is okay.
>
> In a sense, the "Foreword" advertises your book and kind of ties our 2 books together. Especially
since we do have a common drive that is expressed in the "Foreword". Let me know your thoughts,
Gary. I just got a brainstorm to write it last night. Our book is nearly finished in the rough draft and
I am sending it to our editor Paul Kirsch for editing. Perhaps you may like a peek at it yourself. It is
very large, however, and I will have to send it in chunks by email. I hope to hear from you soon (all
comments and additions are welcome too, Gary!).
>
> Best,
>
> Larry Maurer
>Unitel, Inc.
FOREWORD
When we first took on the humungous undertaking of designing, perfecting and eventually
marketing our proposed space ship design along with our medical, quantum computer, and other
industrial applications for our newly-discovered technology, we never expected to gain so much
progress,so quickly. We took on a mountain and we not only climbed it but we are also dancing on top
of it!
For whatever reason, we are driven to see these projects to come to fruition at whatever the cost. We
aren’t involved in this business for the money and maybe that’s why we have accomplished everything
except the major funding our corporation Unitel Inc. needs to begin designing prototypes.
270
After 20 years of carrying the ball, UNITEL has never looked so good. Our proposed prototypes
and projects are based entirely on sound scientific principles. This book tells the story of our progress
from inception to now. When we first started out in 1982, we were told that we “would never get a
patent on our ideas”. In spite of these discouraging words, we were awarded a patent in record time by
the United States Patent Office on March 1989. We were in turn awarded patents in several
international countries including Japan which is far more thorough in their scrutiny of technology before
giving out patents.
We were also told that the scientific community would never accept our “wild ideas”. This attitude
was exemplified with a disenchanting statement after a technical meeting at Edwards Air Force Base in
1984 by one of the USAF representatives that “we will not see the fruition of this type of advanced
technology in our lifetime”. This was after a technical review committee was disbanded before it even
got started.
A physicist on hand from Hughes Aircraft Co who led the technical review of our project by the
USAF quickly shot down our project because “we had not physically observed a monopole”. In 1986, a
couple of fellows by the name of Tomita and Chiao proved him wrong with their world-famous
application of monopole effects to optical fibers and RF waveguides. We only intend to create the same
“monopole effects” with our laser system as Tomita and Chiao did with optical fibers and RF waveguides.
We were told that we would never mathematically prove “Conservation of Energy and Momentum”
by physicists poo-pooing our attempts to progress with our proposed projects. A meeting in 1997 with a
Honda R&D technical review committee, our friend and associate Yoshinari Minami (Manager, Patent
Services, NEC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) successfully proved conservation of momentum and energy
of our proposed aerospace propulsion system by provided mathematical equations.
When we say we are ready to build our prototypes, we really mean it! The only thing we are lacking
is the necessary funding to do so. We understand out technology thoroughly. We have world-class
universities and manufacturer/subcontractors ready to go to work on a 2-year contract and the support
and blessings of many esteemed organizations such as the IAA-IAF.
We are pioneers of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling (MQT) applied to a feasible aerospace
propulsion system,which would allow travel to the distant regions of deep space and our Universe.
When we first described this scientific method of travel in outer space, we were greeted with blank
stares and disbelief. We were all but labeled as quacks or crazy for our ideas. Now “tunneling” is a
well-accepted “buzz word” in most of the World’s top aerospace organizations.
We intend to continue to raise eyebrows by continuing our great progression towards constructing
real prototypes with real effects such as the ponderomotive force applied to our proposed laser plasma.
We need this important and valuable technology for the advancement of Mankind. Through continued
support by our valued devotees, we shall succeed in these endeavors. Several letters have been sent out
to various U.S. Senators. We have a history of strong support from former U.S. Senator of Oregon
Mark O. Hatfield. We expect to draw a lot of attention and support from our government to assist
UNITEL in its endeavors. Perhaps you may want to contact your Senator and Congressman to enlighten
them to our important project proposals.
As Esmond Gary Dean (author of Bridge Across the Universe) lists on his web ite: There are many
reasons why we need to develop our proposed space propulsion system. According to the famous author
of “War of the Worlds”, H. G. Wells; "It's All or Nothing. It's The Universe Or Nothing At All!",
Arthur C Clarke said: "I trust that more than a few decades before we can have safe and economical
271
space propulsion systems depending on a new principles of physics that are now being discussed by far
sighted engineers and scientists. When we know how to do it efficiently the main expenses of space
travel will be cantering and in flight movies".
Russian President Putin said: "Space is the locomotive which will pull forward all other industry
spheres. It is not possible to create new materials. Examine the Earth, prospect natural resources,
forecast weather or communications without a space program".
Chinese Space Scientist Liang said: "For Mankind in the 21st Century, space applications will be as
essential as electricity and oil in the 19th Century." Jim Benson, Space Dev President: "In space; water
is white gold. Any country, any company, any person who can afford a private jet or mega-yacht can
now afford their own deep space mission to the Moon, asteroid, or Mars".
(see: http://icedragon540ny_1.tripod.com/thebridgeacrosstheuniverse )
Our MQT spaceship design is becoming increasingly popular. An article about faster than light
drives hit the cover pages of Popular Science and Scientific American. The front cover of Popular
Science says "Warp Speed Gets Real. We Thought It Was Science Fiction." Then We Visited NASA
where the idea of applying MQT to a spaceship is all but accepted.
In any case, no matter who you are, there is a good reason to accept this technology. The
seriousness of the possible event of a general holocaust that would destroy Mankind presents a clear and
present danger. The real possibility of an asteroid colliding with our planet is inevitable. The last time
we had a close call was only very recently (January 7, 2002) when an asteroid came within 375,000
miles from Earth. We had only 2 weeks notice of that incident.
The next time we have 2 weeks notice may be the last time. Imagine suddenly getting a 2-week
eviction notice from your landlord or your doctor telling you that you have 2 weeks to live. This is not
enough time to build our spaceships to transport any number of our fellow humans to a safe place away
from our planet (if there is such a place). It doesn’t matter how rich you are, how religious or what
religion you may be a part of. No matter what place you hold in Society whether it is government,
corporation, or church, you are not safe. Nor are your loved ones or family members.
The only insurance that you have is to develop a feasible space transportation system for exploration
and development of habitable domains on near and/or distant planets or perhaps the Moon and/or
manmade biospheres to orbit our planet. There are many of us that have viable designs and research that
seriously need funding and have been ignored for far to long. (see: CNN.com - Earth escapes brush
with killer asteroid - January 7, 2002 )
We hope that such a terrible event will not happen. But in all reality it most likely will. We watched
from afar the devastating collision of the Shoemaker-Levy Comet with planet Jupiter in 1999. The
resent close call of 375,000 miles we had with the asteroid is more than likely a preclude to the one
(perhaps much larger asteroid) that is heading our way, this time, in a direct collision course with Earth.
The oil that we enjoy for powering our vehicles may be made out of Mankind this time for future
creatures that may evolve in the next millennia. This is a great reason to develop our space
transportation system. It may be the only insurance we have for the continuation of Mankind.
S-178. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UCLA wave collapse research in laser plasmas
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
272
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Ponderomotive Force
Date : Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:51:31 -0800
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:45:55 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Fwd: Ponderomotive Force
>
> Dear Claudio:
>
> I hope things are going well for you. It has been a while since we last met in Pasadena, California.
We have been progressing slowly and we are happy to receive so many supporters of our projects. I
have attached our new newsletter for your review. As you know, we can always use any help we
can in mathematically expressing the description of our proposed laser plasma system.
>
> The oscillation of the projected potential EM wells that oscillate back-and-forth (energy swing)
should produce the same ponderomotive force as described below in the wave collapse research
performed at Oslo and UCLA. We hope to provide enough information -- especially math
information -- so that we can acquire much-needed funds to construct and test prototypes of our
patented laser plasma system.
>
> Please let me know if you can help us, Claudio. We firmly believe we are on the right track here
concerning the application of the ponderomotive force to a laser plasma. I hope to hear from you
soon.
>>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:28:14 -0800
>> To: [email protected]
>> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Ponderomotive Force
>>
>> Hello Yoshinari:
>>
>> I am curious if it is possible to illustrate mathematically the direct similarity between the
ponderomotive force F = - q*q/(4*omega*omega)*d(|E0|*|E0)/dx and our proposed laser
plasma. Is it possible for you to do this? The potential EM wells that oscillate from the
phase conjugate mirror reflection at the face (similar to of our lens to the end-point that is
moving projected end-point of the projected laser plasma which can collapse only to 10-44 via
Lawrence-Fitzgerald contraction (remember at least one end-point of a quantum string must
move at the speed-of-light). This oscillation can be directly related to the ponderomotive
force that arises due to this oscillation. Since the plasma is pulsed, not only will the
projected field have a higher gain but the "collapse" occurring when the "off" or "pinch-off"
point in the projected pulsed laser plasma. Please let me know your thoughts here,
Yoshinari.
>>
>> This is very similar to the late Prof. John M. Dawson, Physics Dept., UCLA for his
"Plasma Beat Oscillator" laser system. This could be the key we need to express where the
energy comes from in describing our proposed laser plasma beam and its effects. At any
rate, the ponderomotive force will play a significant role in how our proposed laser plasma
will work. Please let me know if you can help. Thank you in advance. Michael can explain
the physics. But he is a little weak in math as you may know. Perhaps Dr. Maccone may be
273
able to write the math. Anyway, Yoshinari, I appreciate your help and it could lead to
recognition for your brilliant work.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Larry Maurer
>>>
>>> Wave Collapse
>>>
>>> Wave collapse is a most exciting phenomenon of plasma physics, first predicted in
a seminal paper by the Russian scientist V.E. Zakharov in 1972. Using a fluid
description of a thermal plasma and distinguishing sharply between slow and fast
dynamics, Zakharov managed to derive 2 coupled differential equations which describe
the nonlinear evolution of so-called Langmuir waves.
>>>
>>> The Zakharov model shows how Langmuir wave packets can collapse so that the
electric field reaches extreme values in a very small region. In the limit where waveparticle interactions are ignored, the Zakharov equations predicts that the electric field
will become infinitely strong in a short time, called the collapse time. In a real plasma,
infinite fields are of course impossible and it has been shown that the collapse is
sooner-or-later halted by wave-particle interactions and the electric field is prevented
from growing indefinitely.
>>>
>>> Why does wave collapse happen?
>>>
>>> The phenomenon of wave collapse is strongly associated with the so-called
ponderomotive force. Before pursuing, let us have a brief look at this peculiar force. A
charged particle bouncing in the field of a constant-amplitude wave will oscillate in a
perfectly periodic manner. If the wave is modulated, however, so that its amplitude
varies slightly with position, the particle will experience a net force working on a time
scale long compared to the wave period. This is the ponderomotive force which can be
derived by taking the time-average of the force on the particle caused by the wave field.
In the 1-dimensional case, the ponderomotive force is given by
>>>
>>> F = - q*q/(4*omega*omega)*d(|E0|*|E0)/dx.
>>>
>>> where "q", "omega", and "E0" are respectively the particle charge, the wave
frequency, and the electric field amplitude, and the asterisks denote multiplication.
Note that the force increases with the gradient of the electric field amplitude E0 but
decreases with the frequency. This is plausible since a large frequency implies that the
direction of the field changes before the particle has had time to move far along the
modulated wave.
>>>
>>> A large spatial gradient leads to a strong ponderomotive force since then the
particle only needs to move a slight distance for the field to change. Since the force
depends only on the charge of the particles, it mainly affects the electrons of a plasma.
>>>
>>> Finally, we note that the expression for the ponderomotive force involves no
expression for the phase of the field. This is due to the fact that we have derived the
force by averaging over all phases (i.e., over one wave period.)
274
>>>
>>> Assume a monofrequent wave which is spatially modulated so that its amplitude
changes with position. The ponderomotive force will then push electrons away from
the regions of large amplitude, and into regions of smaller amplitude. When the
electrons are perturbed, an ambipolar field is set up which causes the ions to move
along with the electrons so that the plasma remains quasi-neutral. Thus the plasma
density drops in regions where the wave amplitude is large and decreases in regions
where the amplitude is small.
>>>
>>> If the wave is (for example, a Langmuir wave) a lower hybrid or an upper hybrid
wave, a drop in the background plasma density implies an increase in the refraction
index. From optics, it is known that wave energy tends to focus into regions of large
refraction index. The result of all this is a strong feedback mechanism.
>>>
>>> Some-or-other mechanism initially modulates the wave field so that the
ponderomotive force pushes plasma away from large-amplitude regions; the refraction
index becomes large in the resulting cavities; wave energy is focused into the regions of
large amplitude; the ponderomotive force intensifies further; more plasma particles are
forced out of the cavities; the refraction index of the cavities increases still further; and
so on and so on.
>>>
>>> Research on wave collapse
>>>
>>> The Plasma-Astrophysics Group of the University of Oslo conducts research on
various aspects of wave collapse. We have looked at the dynamics of individual
cavitons (collapsing wave packets) for the case of Langmuir waves, upper hybrid waves
and other electrostatic waves in weakly magnetized plasmas as well as for Langmuirtype waves in multi-temperature un-magnetized plasmas.
>>>
>>> The wave dynamics has been modeled by partial differential equations which have
been integrated by so-called "spectral methods". For wave collapse applications,
spectral methods are among the fastest known and orders of magnitude faster than selfconsistent particle simulations. Many interesting results have been derived, such a
recurrent wave collapse (where the caviton first tends to collapse, then expands for a
certain period, once more starts to collapse, and so on).
>>>
>>> If you are interested in further reading on our projects on wave collapse, take a
look at our relevant publications. In particular the papers entitled "Nonlinear Wave
Interactions in a 2-Electron Temperature Plasma", "Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency
Waves in Magnetized Plasmas", and "Electron Acceleration by Weakly Nonlinear
High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas."
S-179. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding response from NASA's Breakthrough
Propulsion Project
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: BPP Project - Grants
Date : Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:59:50 -080
275
> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:58:21 -0800
> To: Dave Froning (Boeing Aerospace)
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Fwd: BPP Project - Grants
>
> Dave:
>
> Sounds mighty familiar, doesn't it? If the graft, payoffs, and corruption wasn't bad enough, looks
like they finally cut off whatever future they (I should say that you and I) have. Oh boy! WWII
rockets to Mars. The Public needs to be aware of what we have to offer as a viable alternative to the
same old "spend your tax dollars on rockets to Mars" crap. Never mind a real spaceship!
>
> I guess we have to focus on getting the Public awareness to the alternatives to wasting money in
outer-space transportation methods. Please excuse my "French" here, Dave, but everyone's destiny
is up to us. What a chore to wake up to! Surrounded by scammers, whackos, ill-purveying
competitors, and on and on. It's surely been a long road to hoe. But I truly believe in the fact that
you can't stop progress and we will make it to where we want to be.
> That is constructing prototypes and enlightening the Public to the new technology that we advance.
We represent a lot of hard-working researchers that we have built our project on at the various
universities performing research that we have based our designs on.
>
> Oh well, enough venting already. I just get emotional over this stuff with our government and
their priorities. Wish us luck.
>
> Larry
>>
>> X-Info: IDE / NASA Lewis Research Center
>> X-Sender: [email protected]
>> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
>> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:09:21 -0500
>> To: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
>> From: Jean Schuerger <[email protected]>
>> Subject: BPP Project - Grants
>>
>> Dear Larry,
>>
>> The best source of a grant would be the formal BPP "Call for Proposals" which has now
been delayed. Funding for the solicitation might be cut (see further details on the BPP
Project website: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/ ), and budget assessments are
underway. You may also want to check back to the Project web site in a couple of months
for updated information.
>>
>> However, if you are interested in applying for grants in other areas, please see the
following NASA websites:
>>
>> NASA Grants Office: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/Procure/grants/main.html
>>
>> NASA Research Opportunities On-Line: http://research.hq.nasa.gov/research.cfm
>>
276
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jean Schuerger
>> QSS Group, Inc.
>> Document Control Specialist for the
>> Breakthrough Propulsion Physics (BPP) Project
>>>
>>> At 10:32 PM 01/16/2002 -0800, you (Larry Maurer) wrote:
>>> Hello Jean:
>>>
>>> Please review attached newsletter and following email FYI. Please send me
any grants if we have any chance at applying for them if you have any that
pertains to our technology. Thank you in advance,
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal&Director, Engineering
>>> Unitel, Inc.
>>> (503) 232-2740
>>> www.unitelnw.com
S-180. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding e-mail to Tom Bearden explaining 'quantum
tunneling' for space travel
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 01:35:15 -0800
To: [email protected]
From: "Larry Maurer" <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Re: Another Question
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Another Question
>
> At 08:38 AM 1/27/02 -0600, you wrote:
>
>> Larry,
>> Thanks for the timely response to my e-mail of 01/23/02. As I understand quantum
tunneling, the application on a Macroscopic level as it relates to anything let alone a space
propulsion system is mind-boggling. Can you explain for me in simple layman's terms how
the propulsion system is to function and the obvious advantages of a MQT propulsion
system? I guess I just need you to confirm what I'm thinking.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
> Dear Tom:
>
277
> You know, Tom, that there are millions of our fellow individuals out there in the public that have
the same questions. This is our main goal: to create informative films to be aired on public TV that
will enlighten everyone to the facts concerning MQT and how it is applied to a space transportation
system. This topic is ripe and it's high time that it's being discussed on public TV or even revealed.
It would be of peak viewer interest!
>
> If properly done (as we intend to do), the info film would be a terrific hit. Our proposed film
would, of course, have moving graphic illustrations that would be a qualified representation of the
facts surrounding MQT -- combined with filmed interviews with top aerospace representatives and
researchers -- be a definitely jaw-dropping, mind-boggling event!
>
> Tom, you are one-in-a-million asking the right questions about our advanced aerospace propulsion
system design that we want to present to the viewing audience. There are some important facts -such as quantum tunneling and BECs that the Public may be only somewhat familiar with -- that we
want to present in our proposed films.
>
> I can tell, Tom, that your appetite or thirst (if you will) for information on this topic must be
quenched! That is exactly what we want to do. Especially since we have International patents on
the design of our device and want to explain to the public the significance of our design and how it
relates to our quantum applications which include aerospace propulsion.
>
> Anyway, Tom, you know the juxt of our current business endeavors. All I can say is (quoting my
sister from the mid-1980s newspaper article on us) that "there is power in the masses" and that "you
can't stop progress!" I suppose that I should also throw in the quote that "there is nothing stranger or
stronger than the Truth".
>
> Let me know if you can comment or add to my comments and answers to your question here,
Tom. I know I already answered your question with an email I sent previous to this one. However,
this is how I really feel about the current situation and what we are doing at this point in time. I have
included the "Foreword" to our forthcoming book Flying Colors attached herein for your review.
Comments?
>
> Regards,
>
> Larry D. Maurer, Principal&Director, Engineering
> Unitel, Inc.
> (503) 232-2740
> www.unitelnw.com
>
S-181. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding technical details of UNITEL's back-engineering
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Re: Quantum Computer Break-Through
Date : on, 28 Jan 2002 20:00:39 -0800
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:59:40 -0800
> To: [email protected]
278
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Quantum Computer Break-Through
>
> Bob:
>
> Another addition. Are you aware of the world record (Gauss) being broken at Cal Berkley
(300,000 times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field) as mentioned in our newsletter? The
electromagnet is composed of the same metals (Niobium-Titanium) as our smartskin exterior
charged hull. Except we have our synthetic diamond p-doped layer at the outermost layer for the
computer modulated fractional 1/3 charge at the surface.
>
> Fooling Mother Nature is our ultimate endeavor here, Bob, (as you may know) and we will have a
MOSS system that will be computer modulated (hopefully by our QC "HOLO-1" on-board to
manage our quantum system) system to maintain it to keep the system from decohering. This is
where we had our good friend and associate in Tokyo -- Yoshinari Minami -- supply the math to
support our argument with Kaku that the WKB Approx. does not apply to our design. I can send
you a copy of our paper with this math if you like (our paper that was meant for the IAA-IAF &
STAIF is going into our forthcoming book entitled Flying Colors). I have attached the "Foreword"
to the book herein for your review, Bob.
>
> It's good to hear from you, Bob. I had the term "ponderomotive" stuck in my head. I started
investigating it on the Net and it led me right to the late Prof. Dawson's Plasma Beat Oscillator at
UCLA. In fact, it prompted me to email Prof. Dawson where I discovered (much to my chagrin) that
he died just a couple of weeks before.
>
> We are currently trying to locate Prof. Dawson's associate researchers at UCLA through our
associate editor Paul Kirsch at UCLA medical school. Let me know if you have any comments on
the similarity between Dawson's Plasma Beat Oscillator and our proposed laser plasma with the
oscillating potential EM wells that oscillate between the projected end-point and the Phase conjugate
Mirror (PCM) reflection at the lens surface.
>
> In our case, the wave collapse happens when our (very dense, color mixed) pulsed beam is cuty at
the trailing edge, which adds a pinch on the plasma. Remember, the RGB EM wells are true EM
wavepackets that renormalize to white (just like RGB quarks) amazing coincidence between the
labeled RGB quarks and the real EM spectrum of real color RGB!
>
> Believe me, Bob, we would have never in a thousand years discovered this connection without
being shown a working ship. Who was the mysterious wizard behind the curtain, we may never
know. But reverse-engineering is the truth here. Perhaps you can help us figure the final parts to the
puzzle. We have had 20 years to figure it out (what we were shown) and there isn't much we don't
understand. However, the ponderomotive force (along with the color, dielectric, and adiabatic
forces) is perhaps the key to where we will obtain the necessary energy to perform MQT. It will be
a glorious day for all of us when we can finally build our prototypes!
>
> Regards,
> Larry
>
> At 01:59 PM 1/27/02 -0800, you wrote:
>> Larry,
>>
279
>> Thanks for the update and the file.
>>
>> The "smart skin" is part of the puzzle. If its touch feels like it is "alive", you just might
have something.
>>
>> Kaku has a newsgroup if you are interested in it. I have included the URL:
>> http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/michiokakusscienceforum
>> There are also a number of other Yahoo physics clubs that might be of interest.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>Bob
>>
>> Larry Maurer wrote:
>>> Hello Bob!
>>>
>>> I am fine. How have you been doing? We have been focusing on writing our
autobiography book Flying Colors and talking to movie producers. Yes, Bob, it's down
to that. But we have more faith in John Q. Public than in any so-called major investors
right now. Thanks for letting me know about your posting. I have attached a copy of
our latest newsletter for your review.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Larry Maurer
>>> Unitel, Inc.
>>>
>>>At 11:56 PM 1/25/02 -0800, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> Larry,
>>>>
>>>> How have you been? I am posting on the following site:
http://www.uhnd.com/openforum/forum.cgi/page=0
>>>>
>>>> -- Bob
>>>>
>>>> My new email address is:
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
S-182. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding response Bob Drake (associate of Michio
Kaku's)
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Re: Quantum Computer Break-Through
Date : Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:06:42 -0800
280
Mark:
Bob Drake is an associate of Michio Kaku's and ended up on our side after the much heated debate
with Kaku over the WKB Approx being zero for the Macro level. Both Miller and Minami proved Kaku
wrong and Bob knows it!
Anyway, Kaku "ran for cover" and stopped communicating with us as soon as I mentioned the word
"sighting". What am I supposed to do about the situation? The Eugene Police and the FBI know of the
incidences that alerted the whole town! Are we all supposed to be crazy and sniffing glue (including the
cops!)?
My God! Say the word 'UFO' and it all gets flushed! I firmly believe that the Public is going to see
the truth and then -- and maybe only then -- will somebody make a fucking move to build our stuff!
Larry
S-183. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the Irish inventor claims of tapping the ZPE
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: ZPE e- Generator
Date : Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:36:54 -0800
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:34:53 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: ZPE e- Generator
>
>> Tuesday January 22 10:50 AM ET
>>I rish Inventor Says Cracks World's Energy Needs
>> Photos
>> Reuters Photo
>> By Kevin Smith
>> DUBLIN (Reuters) - It has been a pipe-dream of inventors since Leonardo da Vinci. But
has the secret of free energy now been found in Ireland? A cold stone house on a wind-swept
Irish hillside may seem an unlikely setting for the birthplace of such an epoch-making
discovery. But it is here that an Irish inventor says he has developed a machine that will do
no less than change the world.
>>
>> The 58-year-old electrical engineer who lives in the Irish republic and intends -- for
"security and publicity-avoidance reasons'' to keep his identity a secret has spent 23 years
perfecting the Jasker Power System. It is an electromechanical device he says is capable of
nothing less than replenishing its own energy source.
>>
>> The Irishman is not alone in making such assertions. The Internet is awash with
speculation about Free or "Zero Point'"energy with many claiming to have cracked the
problem using magnets, coils, and even crystals. "These claims come along every 10 years
or so and nothing ever comes of them. They're all cases of 'voodoo science','' said Robert
Park, professor of physics at the University of Maryland.
281
>>
>> The makers of the "Jasker" (a name derived from family abbreviations) say it can be built
to scale using off-the-shelf components and can power anything that requires a motor. "The
Jasker produces emission-free energy at no cost apart from the installation. It is quite
possibly the most significant invention since the wheel,'' Tom Hedrick, the only person
involved with the machine willing to give his name, told Reuters.
>>
>> Hedrick -- the chief executive of a company set up with a view to licensing the device in
the United States -- said the technology shattered preconceived laws of Science. "It's a giant
leap forward. The uses of this are almost beyond imagination.''
>>
>> RED HOT WITH CONTROVERSY
>>
>> Not surprisingly, this topic is red hot with controversy, sharply dividing a world scientific
community still on its guard after the "Cold Fusion'' fiasco of 1989 when a group of Utah
researchers scandalized the scientific world with claims -- quickly found to be unsupported -that the long-sought answer to the problem of Cold Fusion had been discovered.
>>
>> Experts contacted by Reuters were wary, citing the First Law of Thermodynamics which
in layman's terms states that you can't get more energy out than you put in. "I don't believe
this. It goes against fundamentals which have not yet been disproved,'' said William Beattie,
senior lecturer in electrical engineering at Queen's University in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
"These people (Jasker) are either Nobel prize-winners or they don't know what they're
dealing with. The energy has to come from somewhere.''
>>
>> Undaunted, the inventor says that once powered-up, his device can run indefinitely. Or at
least until the parts wear out, adding that he has supplied all his own domestic power needs
free for 17 months. But he is keen to head off the notion that he has tapped into the age-old
myth of perpetual motion. "Perpetual motion is impossible. This is a self-sustaining unit
which at the same time provides surplus electrical energy,'' he said.
>>
>> THE SIZE OF A DISHWASHER
>>
>> In a demonstration for Reuters, a prototype roughly the size of a dishwasher was run for
around 10 minutes using four 12-volt car batteries as an initial power source. Emitting a
steady motorized hum, the machine powered three 100-watt light bulbs for the duration. A
multimeter reading of the batteries' voltage before the device started up showed a total of
48.9 volts. When it was switched off, a second reading showed 51.2 volts indicating that,
somehow, they had been reimbursed.
>>
>> The machine went on to run for around two hours while photographs were taken, with no
diminution in the brightness of the light bulbs which remained lit during a short power cut.
"The draw on the batteries was estimated at more than 4.5 kilowatts. With any existing
technology the batteries would have been drained flat in 1½- minutes,'' the inventor said.
>>
>> Modern theories of Zero-Point Energy have their roots in Quantum Physics and
encompass the fraught areas of ''anti-gravity machines'' and `"advanced propulsion'' research.
Contributors to the debate range from serious exponents of quantum science to those who
insist free energy secrets have been imparted to them by aliens.
>>
282
>> Still others seem convinced the U.S. Government is conspiring to suppress such
discoveries. Nick Cook, aerospace consultant to Janes Defense Weekly and author of The
Hunt for Zero Point' is not as quick as some to dismiss the possibilities. "Zero-Point Energy
has been proven to exist,'' he told Reuters. "The question is whether it can be tapped to
provide usable energy. And to that end, I think it's possible, yes. There are a lot of eminent
scientists now involved in this field and they wouldn't be if there wasn't anything to it.''
>>
>> "In my experience, opinion in this field is extremely polarized. People either go with this
area of investigation in their minds or they don't. And if they don't, they tend to pooh-pooh it
vehemently. It's very difficult to get an objective assessment,'' he said. "Basically, no one
wants to be the first to stick his head above the parapet.''
>>
>> Impervious to skepticism, Jasker's makers see the first practical application of their
technology as a stand-alone generator for home use although the automotive industry could
also be a near-term target given the huge investment in developing substitutes for gasolinefueled engines. With world oil reserves running down, there is mounting urgency in the
quest for alternatives. If the Jasker men really are on to something, it could be the most
important Irish invention since Guinness.
S-184. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contacting Ann Drunyan
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Greetings from my UNITEL Email Account!
Date : Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:52:27 -0800
> From: "Doug Starfield" <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: "Doug Starfield" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 102 13:39:49 +0000
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
>
> Hello All,
>
> Just wanted to let you know that my UNITEL email account is working. It's one more sign of
being a real company. I hope that we get funded soon. Larry, please let me know that you emailed
the pdf version of Dr. Sagan's letter (that I emailed you) to Ann Druyan. It is important that we start
out right with she and her organization. They are probably feeling sad still about the Solar Sail
failure. Maybe we can work off of that to get funding from them.
>
> So in the future, email me to this email account. I'll try and find another virtual office on the Net
for us. The other one went out of business.
>
> If Bryan contacts you, just keep the conversation positive but don't give out anymore game plan to
him. Let him do his own thing. As the boy who cried "I have an investor!" once too often, he needs
to prove himself to us now, I believe.
>
> Larry, could you ask Paul Kirsch to see about doing a UNITEL article for Discovery Magazine?
Take a look at the current issue when you go online (www.discovery.com ) or into a grocery store.
283
Lots of "news" on the very same physics that we are trying to harness with the optical QC and the
Propulsion System.
>
> Regards,
>
> Doug Starfield
> VP, Director of Marketing
> Unitel, Inc.
S-185. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding past corporate pitfalls and human nature in
general
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: human nature
Date : Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:29:14 -0800
At 07:55 AM 1/28/02 -0500, you wrote:
> Larry ->
> This is an afterthought on that DuPont story I told you about.
>
> That was my first job after grad school, working as a chemical engineer assigned to a
technical R&D engineering group within a production plant that had dozens of individual
units (all producing different chemicals). Our group simulated changes to existing processes
as best we could in a small lab. If the tests were convincing enough, the changes were
immediately incorporated into the production units. If more "convincing" was needed -- or if
the changes involved lots of money -- they were next tested in a small 'pilot plant' that could
be rapidly configured. [e.g., sometimes our tests in the lab were "batch" scale as compared to
the steady-state continuous production units; ergo move the next series of tests into a smallbut-continuous-running pilot plant]
>
> I always felt the people that actually "ran" the plant were the individual production unit
managers and not the official plant administrators. Their units were responsibly for
generating "green" dollars (not "funny money") for the plant. They were crusty old-timers
from the old school, not believing in any new-fangled theories until they were 110% sure.
[They didn't want to fix something if it wasn't broken.] Lots of them never had college
degrees. But they "ate" M.S. engineers and Ph.D. chemists for breakfast! Within a week I
was introduced to one of the production managers who was a former All-American lineman
at Syracuse. I offered him my resume and some papers I had published. He was
disinterested but took them anyway. Then he asked me to sit down and he rested his elbow
on his desk and raised his arm. He then said something like "in case you have any doubts on
who has the last word around here ...".
>
> We were required to wear shirts and ties in spite of the fact that we were in the dirty,
smelly, and greasy units a lot of the time. Unlike most recent college new-hires, the oldtimers liked me because I would do things like slide down emergency escape fire-poles,
getting my shirt and pants stained. Rather than waiting for a plant vehicle, I would carry
samples of dirty chemicals and catalysts 3/4-mile to the analytical lab, getting more sweaty
284
and dirty on those hot humid days. (Actually I preferred the outdoors to a desk job anyway.)
I really wasn't doing these things to win their "approval", but they liked me more than other
recent hires and accepted me into their "clique". I found out that when I did offer a
suggestion, they would listen to me in earnest (even if they disagreed) because they saw me
as one of "them".
>
> I did get into trouble one time. One of the products the plant made was Sodium Styrene
Sulfonate. It was a "dye acceptor" added to synthetic fibers like Orlon which made them
retain colors. It was difficult to make. We had to use the standard reaction sequence you
would find in an organic chemistry textbook. Two of the most virulent and nastiest
chemicals I've ever worked with were liquid bromine and SO3 acid and were key players in
this synthesis. I reconfigured the packing in a reaction column in the lab and it seemed to
give a purer intermediate product. But we were using reagent-grade lab-quality ingredients.
I needed an actual sample from the "live" production unit to see if the results could be
duplicated. So a pipe-fitter was called-in to free a corroded sample valve in a feedback line.
Somehow his wrench slipped under all the effort and hit him in his jaw and broke his false
teeth. I ended up on the "shit list" of all the production unit managers because I was the one
who requested the work order and -- in their way of thinking -- I was indirectly responsible
for the lost-time accident that stopped an on-going safety plant safety record.
>
> All of the above serve as an example of the mind-set of some of these people who wield
considerable authority and influence. From a purist's point-of-view, they are wrong. But if
you adopt that attitude, your ideas will never get very far. I think Bearden has made the
mistake of taking these people head-on for all these years. Let's face it, everybody has been
hearing about free-energy, over-unity, weather-control, orgone, cold fusion etc. for 50+
years. Not only Bearden's site but also Jerry Keely (KeelyNet), John Greenwald (The Black
Vault), Boylan and others. Nothing ever comes out of it. Nothing! Not the slightest bit of
experimental evidence that can be duplicated. The latest major fiasco was the Utah cold
fusion flap where lots of money had been spent to replicate the results. The misinterpretation
of the tests just made it that much more difficult for everyone else and their ideas. Now all
the investors are gun-shy.
>
> A lot of them are conservatives like Tom Mahood who adopt an "extraordinary claims
require extraordinary [up-front] proofs" position. See some of Tom's past e-mails to me in
the attachment. People like Tom are similar to the ones I've met in industry. One thing I've
learned you is you can't "reason" with them -- you have to "work" with them. If you try to
"change" them -- I'm right and you're wrong -- you'll just piss them off and you'll nail the
coffin shut for all time. That's why I was suggesting you use Dr. Wolf in a physics "P-R"
role that would solicit help from other physicists rather than force something down their
throats in endless debates. (Of course if he has accumulated his share of detractors, then he's
not the right man for this "intermediary" job. For $250/hr he should be able to change goldinto-lead
>For what it's worth ...
> -- Mark
Mark:
I can really relate to your description of your working conditions. You will probably gather when
you read the book I am writing concerning my career in the engineering industry, that there is a lot of
similarities. When I was at Bonney, Bennett & Peters Consulting Engineers in Eugene, OR, it was the
285
second largest engineering firm on the West Coast (including L.A. etc.). Talk about a corporate pecking
order and the continual bantering of the social & corporate ladder climbers! You can only imagine.
I kept my head down (avoiding social gatherings at the upper-echelon engineers and their clique
parties) and strived for speed and perfection in producing mechanical and structural drawings. I actually
had bets with a checker (Bob Andreason) in the Checking Dept. on getting an ace (perfect drawing with
no mistakes) and Bob would reply: "I've never had a perfect drawing with no mistakes!" Plus Bob made
sure that the "degree of difficulty" was there.
Well, I got my ace and I was quickly rushed to advanced tech positions. I have always been proud to
make my way by technical means and not the devious butt-kissing method.
BB&P was brought to its knees (like Enron) because of a very bad ($100K) mistake by an undertalented social sot who'm we affectionately called "Sluggo". He wormed his way to a management
position by misrepresentations of his supposed technical ability and credibility. He was a large-bellied,
sloppily-dressed, and ill-mannered, almost vulgar in his drafting room small talk atmosphere. He would
act like the office of 110 engineers and technicians in one large office was like it was a popularity
contest just for him.
Sluggo had a very aggressive in his demeanor and would stroll around the office from desk-to-desk
with every word just bellowing out of his pie-hole. We had various sawmill construction projects at
BB&P and we split the departments up into small groups, each group a different client project.
I was in the Mechanical Dept. under the notorious Ray Nyls, Manager of the Mechanical Dept. and
his engineering assistant Manager (second head-Nazi) Clyde McDonald. I shouldn't get down too much
on Clyde. He was a little more mellow. Kind of like the Second Mate part that Harvey Keitel played in
the WWII submarine movie "U-571". Remember after the captain would lay out some atrocious orders,
Keitel would yell at the crew: "Now you boys heard what the captain said now hop to it!" That's what
Clyde would do. He would come around to each tech and make sure they knew what they were doing
etc.
At one point to show the efficiency of our little tightly knit groups that sort of watched over each
other for social defenses etc. Well, a very beautiful blonde office lady named Mychel (i.e., sounds like
"Michael") who (as the gossip was spreading about) was purported to be one of the owner's (Ralph
Bennett) who was married with children (two very spoiled little teenage girls who came into the office
frequently) girl friend. I witnessed the flirtation when Mychel would pass in an out of Ralph's office
(which was classical big-wig office complete with gold fish & bowl).
Well, Old Ray Nyls decided he was going to hire this veteran who had been shot in the head in the
Korean War. Veterans had a powerful effect on our office. Ray was an ex-major in the USAF and a
fighter pilot (I found out in 1984 that he was also a Base Commander at Selfridge AFB with Carl Sagan
and J. Alan Hyneck -Project Bluebook) and had a similar demeanor to J Edgar Hoover's bulldog
attitude.
Anyway, we knew the vet guy that Ray had hired had been shot in the head and that he had had
seizures similar an epileptic attack. Well, they put the guy's desk and drafting station up in the front part
of the office building near Mychel's little station.
About 1/2 hour from lunch, the entire office of 110 employees were suddenly intensely shocked by a
blood-curdling scream from Mychel! At first, there was some initial shuffling and a sudden BLAM!
286
when the guy hit the floor flopping around like a filleted Flounder! (Mychel's shrill Hollywood-like
scream was probably the capper that would have given anyone with a weak heart a heart attack!!)
Everyone stopped what they were doing as the closest engineers ran over and immediately took the
correct action of aiding an epileptic. They stuck a wallet in the guy's mouth and tried to clear desks and
chairs out of the way so the guy could freely flop and twist around on the floor. There was a sort-of split
second whereby everyone was frozen in awe at the spectacle that was going on. That split-second
seemed to last forever (so did the screa!).
Anyway, the guy stopped flopping after a while as others were soothing and petting poor sobbing
Mychal with Owner Ralph Bennett standing in front of his office door with his hands on his hips. It
didn't take long. We had an emergency Technical meeting where Clyde called us into Ralph's office as
Ralph had taken Mychel home and so forth. Clyde kind of made head and mouth movements about the
reasons why. But we were told to take the next day off as we wanted to make the poor vet flopper think
we were all being laid off because of a "big emergency sawmill contract that was suddenly dropped.
Clyde told us that we had the day paid for and that he appreciated it.
How do you like that! I get a paid day off just to get rid of their flopper so Mychel wouldn't stess!
Ray was furious! He hired the flopper and got a butt-chewing from the owners for hiring what they
believed that Ray knew the guy had seizures! That was the beginning of a long slide down for Ray. But
that wouldn't come until later. Enter Sluggo.
Bill Brackman (Head of the Structural Engineering Dept.) brought Sluggo around and introduced
him to each one of us. This was sort of rubbing it into Ray because Brackman was kind of strutting with
this new guy around the Mechanical Dept. and all the interdepartmental strife and competition as if to
say "Looks like I have to do the hiring around here". Sluggo was, I have to admit, somewhat quiet and
shy the first day or so. However, it didn't take our burping, drawling, so-and-so long to brag and
"stroke" his way to the top.
Bill Brackman and Ralph Bennett hired Sluggo as a tech 1 because he supposedly had plywood mill
design experience. WRONG!! As it was way too late before everyone found out what was up. After a
while and several social dinner parties later, our man Sluggo suddenly received the position of Project
Manager of the plywood section of a several hundred $million sawmill-plywood mill facilities in
Springhill, LA. I was instructed to be Sluggo's assistant. I was pulled out of our little group of 5-or-6
technicians in the Mechanical Dept. working on conveyor and materials handling equipment drawings.
We were all working together as a team and had our job Captain. We were an efficient happy group of
drafters. We all thought Sluggo was weird and I cursed the day I was told to work with Sluggo as his
assistant (more like his bitch!).
I had trouble right away with the guy who decided he would try to find fault with me on just about
anything from shoelaces to size of lead. This was as we found out later that it was a daft way of
covering up his lies about the knowledge he supposedly had about plywood mill design. Well, it wasn't
long until Sluggo complained to a couple of higher-ups (just to strike first). I became increasingly more
and more angry at the situation of working with such a fat slob of a work-bully such as Sluggo!
Well, Sluggo told me in one of his ridiculous designs to draw or design the equipment (which was
used to much lighter in weight steel design which I was used to in sawmill materials handling equipment
design). I knew he was wrong and confronted him about the fault in his design (I can't remember what
the flaw was. Possibly a leg running through a support or something idiotic like that).
287
Sluggo reared back in his chair and yelled as loud as he could yell. "I told you how to draw it now
draw it or I will find somebody that can! Now I am very busy right now so get the Hell outa' here!"
This was absolutely insane! Sluggo was turning into a maniac over a simple discussion over what I
thought was "wrong" in my orders that he gave me to do concerning the plywood mill design (concept)
drawings. Sluggo wanted it to appear that I was a troublemaker. This really drew much attention and I
was starting to get those weird "corporate" looks like I had a sign on my back or something I couldn't
see that labeled me as weird.
I decided to take my evidence (which was a copy of what design Sluggo wanted me to do) to the
group of technicians I worked with. We had a little mini tech meeting and it was unanimous that
Sluggo's design wouldn't work.
Nevertheless, I was shipped over to the Structural Dept. the next day. Sluggo moved to a higher
position and the work was allotted to another team. I had been moved to a complete other building from
Sluggo across the street, away from the corporate offices and the dept. heads. I felt like I was trapped
and reprimanded for going against the grain. Ray caught me in the rec room and asked me about the
whole affair and I told him.
A month-or-so late, I was given the task of coordinating mechanical and structural projects at
Springhill. The Structural Dept. had to have all the positions for the support legs in the sawmill before
the conveyors, materials handling equipment drawings were finished. International Paper (IP) -- the
owner of the new mill facilities in Springhill -- were not yet settled on their decision so the last part of
the mill was being held back so concrete could begin to be poured, etc. with conveyor leg pads being
poured in place. If a few conveyor legs had to be changed and it was too late, they would simply use
"Red-heads" (expansion bolts) or drill concrete for leg supports.
Well, there was this log sweep that IP wanted moved that we kept calling Sluggo to finish with IP
on. This went on for almost 3 weeks of telling Sluggo or leaving a message on his machine that IP
wanted to move the log sweeps.
Sluggo dropped the ball. The original log sweeps were "fabbed" up in the shop. Of course, the
entire piece of equipment costing $100K was too short and useless. It was to long for the new position
or they could have chopped or cut it down to fit the size and salvaged part of the money. Sluggo and
Ralph Bennett pleaded with IP to keep the log sweeps and use the fabbed up log sweep. IP wouldn't
budge. BB&P had to eat the $100K loss.
That was the beginning of the end for BB&P. They are out of business today because of that damn
Sluggo and the lying and cheating ways these rats clamber to make it to the top. BB&P went into a
downward spiral of the $100K loss and other cost overruns. They didn't find out about Sluggo's lies
about his knowledge. Remind you of Enron? Sickening, isn't it!
Seems like the Sluggos of the World are getting ferreted out in the bad economic times we have
around now!
S-186. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding article on FTL and "tunneling"
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
288
Subject : Fwd: FTL Article
Date : Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:33:31 -0800
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:09:44 -0800
> From: Robert Drake <[email protected]>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
> X-Accept-Language: en-us
> To: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: FTL Article
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="------------070807060101080903070709"
> X-RCPT-TO: <[email protected]>
> X-UIDL: 304358888
> Status: U
>
> "Faster-than-light speeds in tunneling experiments" -- an annotated bibliography
> Revision and enlargement of this page are currently in progress. I've given up setting concrete
dates. A more thorough text is in the process of being written and, say, 70% done (January 2001).
And until a more complete overhaul, I'll add some more references in a piecemeal fashion
<http://www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de/%7Empoessel/Physik/FTL/tunnelingftl.html#Supp>below .
>
> One central tenet of Special Relativity theory is that light speed is the greatest speed at which
energy, information, signals etc. can be transmitted. In many physics-related Internet newsgroups,
claims have appeared that recent tunneling experiments show this assumption to be wrong and that
information can indeed be transmitted by speeds faster than that of light (the most prominent
example of "information" being a Mozart symphony, having been transmitted with 4.7 times the
speed-of-light).
>
> In this document, I've tried to collect the major references on these faster-than-light (FTL)
experiments. If I find the time, I will develop this into a written introduction on the topic of FTL
speeds and tunneling. So far, it is merely a (possibly incomplete) collection of references. If anyone
has relevant additions/comments, I'd appreciate a <mailto:[email protected]>mail.
>
> Most of the references are to the technical literature (i.e., presuming that the reader has at least a
basic grasp of Physics). However, as usual, those articles have abstracts and conclusions, which
give an overview of what the article is about. Some references that are in German are omitted here,
but
can
be
found
in
the
<http://www.aeipotsdam.mpg.de/%7Empoessel/Physik/FTL/nimtz.html>german version of this page .
>
> What's this all about anyway?
>
> In recent years, some physicists have conducted experiments in which faster-than-light (FTL)
speeds were measured. On the other hand, Einstein's theory of Special Relativity gives light speed
as the absolute speed limit for matter and information! If information is transmitted faster, then a
host of strange effects can be produced (e.g. for some observers, it looks like the information was
received even before it was sent. How this comes about should be described in elementary literature
on Special Relativity). This violation of causality is very worrisome. And thus Special Relativity's
demand that neither matter nor information should move faster-than-light is a pretty fundamental
289
one and not at all comparable to the objections some physicists had about faster-than-sound travel in
the first half of this Century.
<
< So, has Special Relativity been disproved now that FTL speeds have been measured? The first
problem with this naive conclusion is that while in Special Relativity neither information nor energy
are allowed to be transmitted faster-than-light but that certain velocities in connection with the
phenomena of wave transmission may well exceed light speed.
>
> For instance, the phase velocity of a wave or the group velocity of a wave packet are not in
principle restricted below light speed. The speed connected with wave phenomena that (according
to Special Relativity must never exceed light speed) is the front velocity of the wave or wave packet.
Which roughly can be seen as the speed of the first little stirring that tells an observer "Hey, there's a
wave coming". Detailled examinations of the differences between the velocities useful to describe
waves can be found in the classic book * Brillouin, L. 1960 Wave Propagation and Group Velocity.
NY: Academic Press.
>
> Basic information on quantum tunneling can be found in the introductory Quantum Theory
literature.
>
> Characteristic of the discussion of the FTL/tunneling experiments is that the experimental results
are relatively uncontroversial. It is their interpretation that the debate is about. As far as I can see,
right now there is a consensus that in neither of the experiments, FTL-front velocities have been
measured and that thus there is no contradiction to Einstein causality or to Special Relativity's claim
that no front speed can exceed light speed.
>
> The discussion of how much time a particle needs to tunnel through a barrier has been going on
since the 1930s and still goes on today as far as I can tell. This discussion is about "real" tunneling
experiments (like the ones a Berkeley group around Raymond Chiao has done) as well as
experiments with microwaves in waveguides (that do not involve Quantum Mechanics) like those of
G&uumlnter Nimtz et al. An overview of the discussion (including lots of further references) can be
found in * Hauge, E.H. & St&oslashvneng 1989, Review of Modern Physics 61, S. 917--936.
>
> The Berkeley group gives a general overview of their research at
http://www.physics.berkeley.edu/research/chiao/research.html
>
> An experiment of theirs where a single photon tunneled through a barrier and its tunneling speed
(not a signal speed!) was 1.7 times light speed is described in * Steinberg, A.M., Kwiat, P.G. & R.Y.
Chiao 1993: "Measurement of the Single-Photon Tunneling Time" in Physical Review Letter 71, S.
708--711
>
> Articles concerned with the propagation of wave packets that happens FTL and is somewhat
complicated by the fact that the waves "borrow" some energy from the medium -- but does not
violate causality -- are
>
> * Chiao, R.Y. 1993: "Superluminal (but causal) propagation of wavepackets in transparent media
with inverted atomic populations" in Phys. Rev. A 48, B34.
>
> * Chiao, R.Y. 1996: "Tachyon-like excitations in inverted two-level media" in Phys. Rev. Lett. 77,
1254.
>
290
> Aephraim Steinberg ( who is a former graduate student of Chiao's) has written 2 papers especially
on the problem of tunneling time which are available online at * Aephraim M. Steinberg 1995:
"<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9502003> Conditional probabilities in quantum theory and the
tunneling time controversy " in Phys. Rev A52, 32-42 (was preprint quant-ph/9502003).
>
> * Aephraim M. Steinberg 1995: "<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9501015> How much time
does a tunneling particle spend in the barrier region? " in Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2405-9 (was preprint
quant-ph/9501015).
>
> Some other papers of Chiao's Berkeley group are also online -- e.g.
> * Aephraim M. Steinberg, Raymond Y. Chiao 1995: "<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9501013>
Sub-femtosecond determination of transmission delay times for a dielectric mirror (photonic band
gap) as a function of angle of incidence " in Phys. Rev. A51, 3525/8 (was Preprint quantph/9501013).
>
> * Raymond Y. Chiao, Paul G. Kwiat, Aephraim M. Steinberg: "<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quantph/9501016> Quantum non-locality in Two-Photon Experiments at Berkeley " (International
Workshop on Laser and Quantum Optics, Nathiagali, Pakistan, 9-14 July 1994) in Quantum and
Semiclassical Optics7 , 259-78 (was preprint quant-ph/950101).
>
> Earlier experiments by G&uumlnter Nimtz of Cologne University (Universit&aumlt K&oumln),
with whose experiments most of the later newspaper articles are concerned, have been published as
>
> * Enders, A. und G. Nimtz 1993, "Evanescent-mode propagation and quantum tunneling" in Phys.
Rev.E 48, S. 632-634.
>
> * Enders, A. und G. Nimtz 1993, J. Phys. I (France) 3, S. 1089
>
> * Nimtz, G. et al. 1994: "Photonic Tunneling Times"in J. Phys. I (France) 4, 565.
>
> * A description of the equivalence between these microwave-experiments and quantum
mechanical tunneling is described in Martin, Th. und Landauer, R. 1991: "Time delay of evanescent
electromagnetic waves and the analogy to particle tunneling" in Phys. Rev. A 45 , S. 2611-2617.
>
> In reaction to Nimtz' publications, a number of articles appeared which deal with (a) why causality
is not violated in these experiments and (b) how the results of the experiments come about. These
are
>
> * Deutch, J.M. und F.E. Low 1993: "Barrier Penetration and Superluminal Velocity" in Ann. Phys.
(NY)228, S. 184-202.
>
> * Hass, K. und P. Busch 1994: "Causality of superluminal barrier traversal" in Phys. Lett. A 185,
S. 9-13.
>
> * Landauer, R. und Th. Martin 1994: "Barrier interaction time in tunneling" in Rev. Mod. Phys.
66, S. 217-228.
>
> * Azbel, M. Y. 1994: "Superluminal Velocity, Tunneling Traversal Time and Causality" in Solid
State Comm. 91, S. 439-441.
>
> Nimtz's reply and general observations on causality and his experiments can be found in
291
> * Heitmann, W. und G. Nimtz 1994: "On causality proofs of superluminal barrier traversal of
frequency band limited wave packets" in Phys. Lett. A 196, S. 154-158.
>
> As far as the more recent experiments of Nimtz are concerned (especially the popular tunneling of
parts of Mozart's 40th symphony with 4.7 fold light-speed), I have not been able to find references to
a technical article yet. Heitman/Nimtz 1994 (see above) refer to it as "H. Aichmann and G. Nimtz,
to be published". I haven't found it in Physics Abstracts (up to July 1996). I think I should look
again soon), though.
>
> The problem of tunneling times is also the topic of some articles I've found in the quantum physics
(quant-ph) archive, namely
>
> * Toralf Gruner, Dirk-Gunnar Welsch: <http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9606008> Photon
tunneling through absorbing dielectric barriers, Preprint quant-ph/9606008
>
> * Andrea Begliuomini, Luciano Bracci: <http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9605045> The tunneling
time for a wave packet as measured with a physical clock Preprint quant-ph/9605045
>
> * M. S. Marinov, Bilha Segev <http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9603018> On the concept of the
tunneling time Preprint quant-ph/9603018
>
>---------> * Aichmann, H., G. Nimtz and H. Spieker: "Photonische Tunnelzeiten: sunb-- und superluminales
Tunneln" in Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft7, 1995, S. 1258.
>
> * I'm listing this brief publication (a conference abstract) despite its being in German as it is the
only publication directly referring to the tunneling of the Mozart symphony that I know of. The
following article has much more content:
>
> * Nimtz, G. and W. Heitmann: "Superluminal Photonic Tunneling and Quantum Electronics" in
Progress in Quantum Electronics21(2) (1997), S. 81-108.
>
> * Contains an expose of Nimtz' interpretation of his and other tunneling experiments.
>
> * Chiao, R.Y. Chiao and A.M. Steinberg: "Tunneling Times and Superluminality" in Progress in
OpticsXXXVII (1997), S. 345-405.
>
> * Good summary of the "conventional" view why there is no faster-than-light information transfer
in these tunneling experiments.
>
> * Mitchell, M.W. and R.Y. Chiao: "Causality and negative group delays in a simple bandpass
amplifier" in American Journal of Physics 66(1) (1998), S. 14-19.
>
> * Describes a very simple setup with the help of which one can understand how faster-than-light
(or even negative) group and "signal"-velocities can occur without any violation of causality and
without any faster-than-light information transfer.
>
> * Diener, G.: "Superluminal group velocities and information transfer" in Physics LettersA223
(1996), S. 327-331.
>
292
> * General article about the pulse reshaping which, in the conventional interpretation, explains the
faster-than-light (or negative) group velocities.
>
> The following references are from the proceedings of the workshop "Superluminal(?) Velocities:
Tunneling time, barrier penetration, non-trivial vacua, philosophy of physics", organized by F. W.
Hehl, P. Mittelstaedt and G. Nimtz, which took place in Cologne, June 6-10, 1998.
>
> I. Evanescent mode propagation and simulations
>
> * A.M. Steinberg et al.: "An atom optics experiment to investigate faster-than-light tunneling" in
Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 593-601.
>
> * M. Büttiker and H. Thomas: "Front propagation in evanescent media" in Annalen der Physik
(Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 602-617.
>
> * G. Nimtz: "Superluminal signal velocity" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 618-624.
>
> * A. A. Stahlhofen and H. Druxes: "Observable tachyons in the tunneling regime?" in Annalen der
Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 625-630.
>
> * X. Chen and C. Xiong: "Electromagnetic simulation of the evanescent mode" in Annalen der
Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 631-638.
>
> * G. Diener: "Energy balance and energy transport velocity in dispersive media" in Annalen der
Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 639-644.
>
> * H. D. Dahmen et al.: "Quantile motion of electromagnetic waves in wave guides of varying cross
section and dispersive media" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 645-653.
>
> * E. Capelas de Oliveira and W. A. Rodrigues Jr.:"Superluminal electromagnetic waves in free
space" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 654-659.
>
> II. Superluminal quantum phenomena
>
> * F. E. Low: "Comments on apparent superluminal propagation" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig),
7 (1998), S. 660-661.
>
> * C. R. Leavens and R. Sala Mayato: "Are predicted superluminal tunneling times an artifact of
using the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation?" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 662670.
>
> * J. G. Muga and J. P. Palao: "Negative time delays in one dimensional absorptive collisions" in
Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 671-678.
>
> * S. Brouard and J. G. Muga: "Transient increase of high momenta in quantum wave-packet
collisions" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 679-686.
>
> * C. Bracher and M. Kleber: "Minimum tunneling time in quantum motion" in Annalen der Physik
(Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 687-694.
>
293
> * D. Kreimer: "Locality, QED and classical electrodynamics" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7
(1998), S. 695-699.
>
> * K. Scharnhorst: "The velocities of light in modified QED vacua" in Annalen der Physik
(Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 700-709.
>
> * P. Mittelstaedt: "Can EPR-correlations be used for the transmission of superluminal signals?" in
Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 710-715.
>
> * G. C. Hegerfeldt: "Instantaneous spreading and Einstein causality in quantum theory" in Annalen
der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 716-725.
>
> * G. F. Melloy and A. J. Bracken: "The velocity of probability transport in quantum mechanics" in
Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 726-731.
>
> * H. M. Krenzlin et al.: "Wave packet tunneling" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S.
732-736.
>
> III. Causality, Superluminality, and Relativity
>
> * P. Weingartner: "Causality in the natural sciences" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S.
737-747.
>
> * U. Schelb: "On the role of a limiting velocity in constructive spacetime axiomatics" in Annalen
der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 748-755.
>
> * V. Gasparian et al.: "On the application of the Kramers-Kronig relations to the interaction time
problem" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig) , 7 (1998), S. 756-763.
>
> * E. Recami et al.: "Superluminal microwave propagation and special relativity" in Annalen der
Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 764-773.
>
> * H. Goenner: "Einstein causality and the superluminal velocities of the Cologne microwave
experiment" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 774-782
>
> * Aichmann, H., G. Nimtz and H. Spieker: "Photonische Tunnelzeiten: sunb-- und superluminales
Tunneln" in Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft7, 1995, S. 1258.
>
> * I'm listing this brief publication (a conference abstract) despite its being in German as it is the
only publication directly referring to the tunneling of the Mozart symphony that I know of. The
following article has much more content:
>
> * Nimtz, G. and W. Heitmann: "Superluminal Photonic Tunneling and Quantum Electronics" in
Progress in Quantum Electronics21(2) (1997), S. 81-108.
>
> * Contains an expose of Nimtz' interpretation of his and other tunneling experiments.
>
> * Chiao, R.Y. Chiao and A.M. Steinberg: "Tunneling Times and Superluminality" in Progress in
OpticsXXXVII (1997), S. 345-405.
>
294
> * Good summary of the "conventional" view why there is no faster-than-light information transfer
in these tunneling experiments.
>
> * Mitchell, M.W. and R.Y. Chiao: "Causality and negative group delays in a simple bandpass
amplifier" in American Journal of Physics 66(1) (1998), S. 14-19.
>
> * Describes a very simple setup with the help of which one can understand how faster-than-light
(or even negative) group and "signal"-velocities can occur without any violation of causality and
without any faster-than-light information transfer.
>
> * Diener, G.: "Superluminal group velocities and information transfer" in Physics LettersA223
(1996), S. 327-331.
>
> * General article about the pulse reshaping which, in the conventional interpretation, explains the
faster-than-light (or negative) group velocities.
>
> The following references are from the proceedings of the workshop "Superluminal(?) Velocities:
Tunneling time, barrier penetration, non-trivial vacua, philosophy of physics", organized by F. W.
Hehl, P. Mittelstaedt and G. Nimtz, which took place in Cologne, June 6-10, 1998.
>
> I. Evanescent mode propagation and simulations
>
> * A.M. Steinberg et al.: "An atom optics experiment to investigate faster-than-light tunneling" in
Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 593-601.
>
> * M. Büttiker and H. Thomas: "Front propagation in evanescent media" in Annalen der Physik
(Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 602-617.
>
> * G. Nimtz: "Superluminal signal velocity" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 618-624.
>
> * A. A. Stahlhofen and H. Druxes: "Observable tachyons in the tunneling regime?" in Annalen der
Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 625-630.
>
> * X. Chen and C. Xiong: "Electromagnetic simulation of the evanescent mode" in Annalen der
Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 631-638.
>
> * G. Diener: "Energy balance and energy transport velocity in dispersive media" in Annalen der
Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 639-644.
>
> * H. D. Dahmen et al.: "Quantile motion of electromagnetic waves in wave guides of varying cross
section and dispersive media" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 645-653.
>
> * E. Capelas de Oliveira and W. A. Rodrigues Jr.:"Superluminal electromagnetic waves in free
space" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 654-659.
>
> II. Superluminal quantum phenomena
>
> * F. E. Low: "Comments on apparent superluminal propagation" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig),
7 (1998), S. 660-661.
>
295
> * C. R. Leavens and R. Sala Mayato: "Are predicted superluminal tunneling times an artifact of
using the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation?" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 662670.
>
> * J. G. Muga and J. P. Palao: "Negative time delays in one dimensional absorptive collisions" in
Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 671-678.
>
> * S. Brouard and J. G. Muga: "Transient increase of high momenta in quantum wave-packet
collisions" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 679-686.
>
> * C. Bracher and M. Kleber: "Minimum tunneling time in quantum motion" in Annalen der Physik
(Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 687-694.
>
> * D. Kreimer: "Locality, QED and classical electrodynamics" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7
(1998), S. 695-699.
>
> * K. Scharnhorst: "The velocities of light in modified QED vacua" in Annalen der Physik
(Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 700-709.
>
> * P. Mittelstaedt: "Can EPR-correlations be used for the transmission of superluminal signals?" in
Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 710-715.
>
> * G. C. Hegerfeldt: "Instantaneous spreading and Einstein causality in quantum theory" in Annalen
der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 716-725.
>
> * G. F. Melloy and A. J. Bracken: "The velocity of probability transport in quantum mechanics" in
Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 726-731.
>
> * H. M. Krenzlin et al.: "Wave packet tunneling" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S.
732-736.
>
> III. Causality, superluminality and relativity
>
> * P. Weingartner: "Causality in the natural sciences" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S.
737-747.
>
> * U. Schelb: "On the role of a limiting velocity in constructive spacetime axiomatics" in Annalen
der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 748-755.
>
> * V. Gasparian et al.: "On the application of the Kramers-Kronig relations to the interaction time
problem" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig) , 7 (1998), S. 756-763.
>
> * E. Recami et al.: "Superluminal microwave propagation and special relativity" in Annalen der
Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 764-773.
>
> * H. Goenner: "Einstein causality and the superluminal velocities of the Cologne microwave
experiment" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 774-782.
296
S-187. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more technical discussion on FTL, ZPE, antigrav
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: More FTL
Date : Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:18:37 -0800
> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:40:04 -0800
> From: Robert Drake <[email protected]>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
> X-Accept-Language: en-us
> To: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: More FTL
>[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> X-RCPT-TO: <[email protected]>
> X-UIDL: 304358923
> Status: U
>
> QUANTUM MECHANICS has been with us for over 60 years and has been thoroughly put
through its paces both experimentally and theoretically. Yet physicists continue to be haunted by its
strange implications (e.g., virtual particles, anti-matter, negative energy, energy, dinger's cat).
>
> Now it appears there is something else to add to the list: light that travels faster-than-light. Recent
and past experiments that show that C can not only be slowed but also speeded up have been in the
science news forefront for the past 2 years. Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity says that
anything that traveled faster-than-light would also have to travel backwards in time. So if light can
travel faster-than-light, shouldn't it be possible to send signals backwards in time causing all sorts of
mayhem with effects taking place before anything ought to have caused them?
>
> Well, not exactly. It turns out that the Quantum World is so strange that it is -- after all -- possible
to break Einstein's speed limit. Until very recently, the consensus was that this would not violate
Einstein's theories. But some tantalizing new results reported at a meeting last month are not so easy
to explain away. If they prove true, Relativity theory could be in trouble.
>
> The heart of all such experiments actually goes back to something that has been around for
generations. One is the concept of "tunnel" effects. The other has to do with the structure of the
medium photons (the carrier of light) is traveling in.
>
> Ever since white light was split apart into its separate components or frequencies, we have been
changing the speed-of-light just slightly. But that effect is due to a slowing of C in a diffraction
medium. Now along comes experiments that show the group velocity of a propagated wave of light
in a waveguide can be made to far exceed C.
>
> Notice that I mentioned group velocity here. This concept of a "group velocity" traveling greater
than C has been around in the electronics communication field as long as we have had microwaves
and waveguides. Several decades back, it was noticed that a magnetic image of a signal traveling in
a wave guide moves ahead of the actual signal. That image actually does travel faster than C and
experiments have proved this many times over as does the waveguide math.
>
297
> The problem has always been that it is an image that cannot be used to transmit data of any type
(except perhaps if a proper detector could be fashioned so that an on/off data stream was used). To
date, I know of no one who has directly tried this.
>
> Now we have something new on the horizon. In particular, there is the work of Raymond Chiao
and colleagues at the University of California at Berkeley. Chiao has been pioneering a range of
experiments that probe the twilight zone of Quantum Mechanics -- an alien world where ghostly
particles can spontaneously appear and disappear; where objects can pass through solid walls; and
where everything seems to dance to a different tune depending on whether or not you happen to be
watching.
>
> Quantum Tunneling is, in itself, a remarkable phenomenon because it involves particles traveling
through barriers that ought to be impenetrable. If you throw a ball at a wall, you expect the ball to
bounce back and not to pass straight through it. Yet subatomic particles pull off the quantum
equivalent of this feat with consummate ease. According to Quantum Theory, there is a distinct
(albeit small) probability that a particle can tunnel its way through a barrier even if it does not have
enough energy to jump over. The probability declines exponentially with barrier thickness. So for
all practical purposes, Quantum Tunneling is usually observed only when barriers are no thicker than
a few atomic layers.
>
> Nevertheless, Quantum Tunneling has many practical applications including playing a major role
in nuclear fusion, in electronic devices such as the tunnel diode, and in tunneling electron
microscopes (the highest resolution microscopes in existence). What Chiao and others have done is
measure how long it takes particles of light (photons) to tunnel through a barrier. Their rationale
was a pile of theoretical calculations (some weer formed as long ago as the 1930s) which suggested
a strange idea.
>
> In 1932, L. MacColl of Bell Labs wrote: "When a particle tunnels through a barrier, it does so
without any appreciable delay." The implications of this, though, did not become apparent until
1955 when Eugene Wigner and his student L. Eisenbud at Princeton analyzed the problem and
concluded that under some circumstances tunnelling particles could actually travel faster-than-light.
>
> This bizarre conclusion has been re-examined and argued about by theoreticians over the decades.
The problem is that many ways of looking at it seem to leave common sense behind. What actually
happens in the tunnel effect is that the wave nature of a particle comes into play. As that particle hits
that barrier, its wave function starts to collapse. From the perspective of one who works with String
theory, the outer membrane extension collapses. If the barrier is small enough, that waveform will
not totally collapse before the opposite side of the barrier is reached. In that case, the wave reexpands again on the other side and the particle pops back into its existance as a particle-wave again.
To an outside observer, the particle vanishes at one point and reappears again at another point.
>
> This barrier jumping goes on all the time in semi-conductors in equipment like this computer. But
there is an aspect that even Dirac noticed to this function that does seem to exceed C. Certain
aspects of a particle's state can be communicated across distances faster than light is able to travel.
Dirac chose to ignore these aspects even though he once worked the math out and showed it
followed a modified Lorentz formula. I mentioned that aspect on my own site in the proof from
other theories section.
>
> To date, I believe that M-theory has been the only field of study that has confronted these
contradictions and found an answer that obeys relativity to the letter. What most have always
ignored is that just like Dirac's formulas for the electron predicted an opposite counterpart, so does
298
Relativity. Einstein himself noted the possible existence of what is now called "tachyons" (i.e.,
particles that travel faster-than-light). But like so many after him, he choice to ignore those states.
What M-theory does is find an answer to why we cannot observe those states. They exist in a higher
dimensional framework that is compacted smaller than the Planck scale.
>
> As I mentioned to GeometroDynamics in an email and to others, my own modified M-theory is the
same as regular M-Theory in that it is actually an 11-D framework. I just choice to ignore Time in
my discussion of 6-D space-time because it simplifies things. Time and velocity there do exist. But
at a higher rate from ours.
>
> What we experience as time passage in relation to motion is actually a combination of 2 time
frames that add to make a different value. Just as the energies in both sub-spaces add together or
blend together to make the values we can measure in particles and fields. Does this imply that Time
runs backwards in 6-D space? No, not within its own time frame. Only in relation to our
perspective. Cause and effect within each time frame still follow a set path. But each of those paths
is opposite in the other frame. It's like a mirror image. Left and right are reversed in a mirror. But
the image is still the same image. Only the symmetry is changed by reversal.
>
> On Kant and Einstein's First Principles
>
> One of the major problems (as good as Relativity) is that the philosophical implications of the
likelihood that observation will continue to reveal an infinite universe have never been actually
decently considered. It is very true that Einstein well answered Kant's Antinomy of Space. But his
method does so without answering the Antinomy of Time.
>
> Part of this is the finite and unbounded principle that almost all of us in physics use. Indeed, it is
almost counter-logic to state such. A finite Universe by its very nature has to have a boundary or
event horizon. Otherwise the Universe one is describing would be infinite. That boundary is formed
by the most extreme point in all directions (given uniform expansion which evidence points to) of
both matter and energy.
>
> Consider such a uniform expanding sphere of photons and thus discount any non-uniform changes
in expansion rate . Such a system must by nature have a boundary. Else what it is expanding into
would have to be considered part of the system in question. Since that which it is expanding into
cannot be considered the same vacuum state as our present universe. One cannot consider it to be
part of our Universe except as possible another sub-space. Secondly, since nothing can be
determined by experiment or observation about this unique sub-space owing to the fact it would be
an absolute zero. I do not feel a zero can be considered a true sub-space.
>
> I have made reference to Kant herein. Some have tried to claim that Kant implied in his ideas
though he predates such that non-Euclidean geometry is logically impossible. I personally do not
believe that is a correct interpretation of Kant. I personally follow some like Leonard Nelson
("Philosophy and Axiomatic," Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy, Dover, 1965; p.164. Kant
to us simply though the axioms of geometry are synthetic. Thus it is not truly analytic. We base our
geometry on observation and to a certain extent on visualization. This applies to both normal
Euclidean geometry and non-Euclidean geometry. Non-Euclidean geometry did not change our
spatial imagination. It only proved what Kant had already implicitly claimed -- the synthetic and
axiomatically independent character of the first principles of geometry.
>
> If Kant is right, then we will never be able to imagine the appearance of Lobachevskian or multidimensional non-Euclidean spaces or to model them without extrinsic curvature, however well we
299
understand the analytic equations. But I do not feel this prevents us from coming to grips with a real
answer to Kant on both space and time. This has been the crux of our problem not only here in our
discussions. But it is a fundamental problem across the board in both Physics and Cosmology. We
all tend to use different terms when it comes to time. Most of our definitions of space all remain the
same. Whether one choices to follow the Newtonian approach, that of Einstein, that of M-theory, or
any other approach. It's when we start describing our fundamentals of time that we all diverge.
>
> Put this on the record. I am not saying my own definition of Time is any better than anyone else's.
But I do feel it goes a long way to defining time and removing the original problem of the boundary
problem. As such, it does attempt to at least go a bit beyond Einstein and give an answer to Kant on
both space and time.
>
> The Special Theory of Relativity is nothing less than an adaptation of physical principles to
Maxwell-Lorentz Electrodynamics. It takes the assumption of Euclidean Geometry that is valid for
ridged bodies, the inertial frame, and inertia. It combines them with the invariance of the velocity of
light from electrodynamics. To get these two to agree, it had to abandon the concept of "absolute
time". That much is shown in Einstein's own lecture to the Nordic Assembly of Naturalist on July
11, 1923.
>
> However, what most forget is that GR does not follow Euclidean Geometry. As such, GR itself
modifies SR. GR is built upon a higher dimensional form of geometry. It is non-Euclidean and as
such it abandons those original assumptions and takes them as strictly a separate case. The biggest
thing that GR does do is it keeps those assumptions from ElectroDynamics. As such, it agrees with
the invariance of the speed-of-light in the vacuum. But it even more stipulates that the geometry of
that vacuum controls that invariance.
>
> Since early times, we have known that if you change that vacuum state you alter the speed-oflight. Light in water, for instance travels at 75% of its velocity in a vacuum. In fact, in water certain
things can and do travel faster than light. So thus, we do have proof that the invariance of C only
pertains to the normal vacuum state. It also only would pertain to the present state of that vacuum.
>
> When one tries to abstract backwards in time towards T=0, one encounters a state where the
vacuum density overall changes. One cannot by principle then assume that invariance as seen in our
present state holds true then. Nor can we by principle hold that it would hold true under all changed
states of that vacuum. Thus, Relativity does have its limits like it or not. Those limits are defined by
the terms that C remains constant in the vacuum as we now observe it and know it to be. Beyond
that, one simply cannot state otherwise unless one desires to go against the very fundamental
underpinnings of relativity itself and against the one who wrote that theory.
>
> Natural FTL States Explained
>
> Consider the interval given by ds2 = A(z,r)dct2 - A-1(z,r)dz2 - dr2 - r2dq2. 'A' will go to '1' as r
goes to ¥ . A will be -1 at r = 0 for a finite length along z of (a,b) and again 'A' will go to '1' as z
goes to ± ¥ . A coordinate transformation that reduces this interval to the form of special relativity at
the location of an observer between (a,b) at r = 0 is given by ct = z', z = ct'. Time ct and space z are
folded over in this region. This results in a velocity transformation u = c2/u'.
>
> Thus an object still with respect to this local frame moves from point 'a' to point 'b'
instantaneously. Now a boost can be done from the local inertial S' frame to another local inertial
frame S" and the transformation will be Lorentz. This leads to the general transformation from a
local frame to the remote frame given by ct = gz' + gbetact' and x = gct' + gbetax'. But these are
300
inverted compared to the Lorentz transformation equations. b is the velocity of S" with respect to S'.
This leads to the velocity transformation u =c2(1 + vu'/c2)/(u' + v).
>
> Now the fastest that S" can move with respect to S' is v = c and this results in u = c. Thus we see
that for this case of space-time folding c is the speed minimum instead of the speed maximum. This
same effect happens in matter cross the event horizon of a black hole. Thus under the event horizon,
the coordinate speed-of-light falling radialy into a Schwartzschild hole is a speed minimum for in
falling objects rather than a speed maximum. It is also the same effect arrived at in crossing the
membrane into 6D space-time.
>
> In http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9907/9907019.pdf , it has been referenced that in 2dimensional space-time modeling of the effects of Alcubierre's Warp Drive Theory there has been
discovered that the vacuum stress energy of a quantified massless field would diverge on the
Horizon as it formed. This extended to a 4-D model shows that an infinite amount of energy would
be formed from the divergence and by semi-Classical back reaction such would prevent a ship from
achieving any usable warp field beyond that of C. However, this does not rule out attaining C itself
or any fraction of C via a similar method. Even the attainment of C by any spaceship would be a
fundamental increase in our ability to travel in space.
>
> So the field of both negative energy and warp field generation does deserve further research. It
certainly hints that there exists at least on mathematically and modeling grounds ability to extend our
current velocities of space travel to that horizon boarder. There has also been research done by those
originally involved in this and other institutions that have shown those divergences can be at least at
the model level worked around into something that allows carrying the field on up in velocity gain.
Some of those have even shown far less energy requirements of negative energy to achieve that
effect.
>
> It is the effect that interests me the most in their model. The Alcubeirre solution allows a craft or
any object to have an apparent speed relative to an observer elsewhere which is greater than the
speed-of-light. This is achieved by an effect caused by space-time expanding behind the craft and
being compressed in front of the craft.
>
> There does remain a possible means of achieving the same effect without the usage of negative
energy. The structure of 6-D space-time with the effects of 4-D space-time canceled out would be
one of rapid expansion back towards its normal state of a perfect vacuum state. If the 4-D portion
could be canceled out behind a ship, this same effect could be generated. This could be possibly
done by using an effective opposite going phase wave type field in that area that cancels the normal
positive going phase wave within a given region of space.
>
> The biggest problems concern creation of that transtating wave (as I have chosen to call it). And
focusing such a field projection so a craft or object can remain in its own bubble of normal spacetime within. Such a field generation (while by no means impossible in the future) is beyond our
present capability of generating at this time. But it does open an interesting field of research that
should be pursued.
>
> One method that is also disserving of mention is that uncontrolled energy violations are an
intrinsic part of any brane based low energy approximation to String theory. (They also occur in Mtheory.) The possible results of these energy violations are transverable wormholes; ability to avoid
a singularity condition; and production of negative energy. Some of this has been referenced before
in http://www.physics.wustl.edu/~visser/npb584-2000-415.pdf by Carlos Barcelo & Mat Visser with
301
the Physics Department at Washington University. In fact, his own work has shown others have
noted the time reversed mirror universe effect in other String theories.
>
> Just usually most have considered it a nulled out condition with our Universe being a sort of baby
universe attached to it via the membrane as a horizon point. One thing I have noted in his work is
that the only known stable conditions for such do invoke a negative cosmological constant. This in
light of the discovered speeded up expansion and my own modeling (which includes such shows)
that at least we may be on the right track.
>
> It is also interesting that some models do allow a dual membrane or boundary condition to exist.
This would make in our discussion C states a similar condition. But they do not forbid a slip over
effect by any means. The real problem would be control of such which I still believe is beyond our
knowledge at this time. But the door does remain open to such.
>
> I find it remarkable considering the categorical acceptance of Relativity as an absolute condition
that the scientific community has gotten this far in an open discussion of at least the possibility that
relativity may be only a portion of a larger picture. It seems that Science is poised to literally take
such a step to go beyond the classical in its understanding. We live in unique times which may
allow a lot of the dreams and desires of man to be fulfilled. Only time and research and new
definitions stand in our way at present.
>
> STABLE CTC SOLUTION FROM A MODIFIED M-THEORY
>
> To remove those condition from a static formulated transversible wormhole solution that generate
violation to classical energy conditions to Einstein's equations, one must do the following: using
generalization from a Misner space which has been modified if one analytically continues the
maximal extended Misner Metric so that ds2= -du2+dw2+(dx2)2+(dx3)2 to the Euclidean section so
that u=iota zeta we obtain a Misner instanton on the section where w and zeta are both real. The
Euclidean time t and the closed space-like coordinate are both periodic (the later having a period of
2πT2.
>
> Going back to the Lorentzian sector, we find that the period of the closed coordinate becomes
linerally dependent on the physical time. Using automorphic fields in the Hadamard function, one
can obtain a quantized condition for time. This gives us a figure on the order of the Planck time.
This confines such a stable wormhole condition to the general area of the Planck scale. Which my
own theory has stipulated in its modified form is that area defined by the Membrane itself.
>
> Thus for the mention in my work of the tube within a tube structure. These Planck scale
wormholes are the true source of the true virtual aspects of the vacuum. It's an overlap zone of 2
distinct space-times which has boundary conditions on both sides. As an object accelerates towards
C, it is this same boundary or horizon that object encounters when the time-defined horizon solution
for the Universe is imposed in our modeling. The question becomes since energy itself intermixes in
this region, how can one jump or slip across that barrier?
>
> Some Proposed Material on FTL Warp Theory
>
> Special Relativity is only a special case of physics within a more general theory known as General
Relativity. In General Relativity, the vacuum speed-of-light is locally invariant but not globally
invariant. The vacuum speed-of-light remote from a given observer need not be c. It can be greater
than c and can vary with direction depending on the gravitational field involved. Because this is
302
allowed, starships that travel between the stars faster than c are not ruled out a-priori within the
physics of General Relativity.
>
> In 1994, physicist Miguel Alcubierre of the University of Wales published how to use General
Relativity to consider a space-time geometry -- actual "warp drives"! -- that would undo the Special
Relativistic time dilation effects and allow for faster than c travel in the May issue of Classical and
Quantum Gravity (see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0009013). His space-time geometry would also
allow for acceleration of the ship without any internal forces crushing the crew. They would feel
weightless as the ship accelerated.
>
> Unfortunately, in the arbitrary manner that the metric was developed it was shown by Pfenning &
Ford to require a lot of negative energy that would violate a few quantum mechanics energy
conditions and a greater magnitude of it than all the mass of the known Iniverse (see
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9702026).
>
> A case of the space-time geometry that he had derived can be represented in the following
equation ds2 = dct2 - (dx - betafdct)2 - dy2 - dz2 f can be any function of the coordinates that is one
at the location of the starship and zero far from it. Transforming coordinates to a particular choice of
the starship coordinate frame and allowing it to travel faster than c (b > 1), coordinate singularities
crop up in the equation corresponding to event horizons in front of and behind the ship enclosing it
in a mathematical bubble. This is called the "warp bubble". Even though the event horizons remain
for any choice of ship frame, there is a choice for star ship coordinates for which the singular nature
is transformed away.
>
> Chris Van Den Broeck of the Institute for Theoretical Physics at the Catholic University of
Leuven, Belgium came up with an alteration for this space-time geometry that would retain all of the
desired warp drive qualities but reduced the negative energy requirements down to the order of a
transversable wormhole. (see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9905084/)
>
> The space-time geometry can be represented by this equation ds2 = dct2 - B2[(dx - beta fdct)2 +
dy2 + dz2 B can be any function that is large near the starship and one far from it although he used a
specific Top Hat function for his example calculations. That not only brought the negative energy
requirements down to a hopefully one day reachable goal but also solved one of the quantum
mechanics energy condition violations.
>
> To consider these transformation as extended to 4-dimensional space-time with arbitrarily time
dependent acceleration, wWe also present the ship frame energy density T00 from a 4-dimensional
calculation and note that the 4-D classical calculation is everywhere finite.
>
> Consider an Alcubierre interval given according to a remote frame's cylindrical coordinates by
ds2 = (1 - beta2f2)dct2 + 2bfdctdz - dz2 - dr2 - r2df?2 whre f is a function that is 1 at the location of
the ship and zero far from it. We start out with the first transformation
z' = z - òctbetadct where b is first expressed here as a function of time ct. With some algebra for
simplification, this results in ds2 = [1 - beta2(1 - f)2]dct2 - 2b(1 - f)dctdz' - dz2 - dr2 - r2df?2 .
>
> Let g = 1 - f and this becomes ds2 = (1 - beta2g2)dct2 - 2bgdctdz' - dz'2 - dr2 - r2df?2
>
> Notice that this returned the original intervals form with a reversal on the sign of b and a reversal
of the boundary conditions for g. Now we notice that at r = 0, this interval becomes the interval for
Special Relativity transformed to cylindrical coordinates. Thus,we have found a transformation to a
frame based local to the ship. One can also verify that in these coordinates the relevant affine
303
connections vanish at r = 0. Basically there are several models to work with when it comes to the
subject of warp drives. The problem in all cases is generating the negative energy.
>
> First Principles of FTL Travel
>
> The first principle of warp technology will be that the main reason we will ever exceed the lightspeed limit is inertia. As a body approaches the light speed limit C, its mass due to kinetic energy
gain will increase exponentially up to infinity at C.
>
> Our second problem is Time which means that Time must stand still to a body moving at C or the
principle of Relativity will be violated.
>
> Field acceleration refers to the acceleration of the body by applying the momentum to the
components which make up the body rather than to the body itself. The difference may seem small.
However, it is profound. In older forms of propulsion, force is applied from the power plants and is
subject to inertia as it propagates through the body to change its inertial state. With a field
accelerator, the body is immersed in the field and biased to a certain inertial state. There is no
inertial effect since the force does not have to propagate across the body.
>
> Any quantum force of sufficient capacity can produce a warp field. Gravitation is the most often
expressed force. However, electromagnetism is the most used force since it is the most controllable
and understood. It is also important to note that electroweak force (of which electromagnetic force
is a subset) is kinetic whereas the strong force is static.
>
> Static forces are difficult to bias and often require an actual imbalance in the field to achieve the
warp effect. Kinetic forces have a polarity and can easily be biased in their natural flows without
applying undue stress to the structure of the body involved. This was why I have referenced a group
of frequencies EM field in my own work with the phase shifted ahead of individual phase waves of
the particles that make up the craft. Match the phase wave frequency; and even though a phase wave
differs from an EM wave, the two will interact with each other.
>
> Field acceleration handles the time question as well. The body within the field experiences no
inertia and is therefore in a state of stable inertia all the time. Such bodies are moving at sub light
velocities sufficiently small as not to experience major time dilation. It is the surrounding space
which is warped by the allererator field. Quantum acceleration of the entire field frame compresses
space in an isolinear fashion. I mentioned a few times in my own proposal besides the lessening of
dilation effects. It is also a velocity that we could achieve in the future.
>
> Other proposed methods of FTL travel work along similar lines to achieve the same effect.
>
> There are 5 basic proposed methods of achieving faster-than-light motion as far as solid matter
states. They are (1) Alcunierre's method and those based upon his original idea; (2) the Phase Shift
Method; (3) the Phase Canceling Method; (4) the Jump Gate Approach; and (5) QESAT or Quantum
Entangled Spin Altered Transport as I have chosen to call it.
>
> All of these methods work by either altering the vacuum structure of space-time or by utilizing the
odd behaviour shown in Quantum Mechanics. None of these methods in any fashion violate
anything generally established under Relativity. They simply alter the conditions and thus change
the perimeters. While the last method is interesting in some forms I have heard proposed, it does
have the problem of establishing a near rest carbon copy of the original craft or object one wishes to
accelerate. The Jump Gate proposal -- while possible -- is way beyond our capability at this time
304
and most likely any time in the near future. I believe only the first 3 methods are a worthy area of
focus at this time. They are more related than unrelated and cross research benefit exists. They all
could benefit from research in the Quantum Entanglement field.
>
> NEGATIVE ENERGY FIELD GENERATION FROM THE ZPF AND AMPLIFICATION
METHODS
>
> Scientists through the 19th Century believed in the existence of an "ether" which was modeled as a
material substance that could support the wave propagation of light.
>
> The famous Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect the expected ether wind produced by
the Earth's motion through it. At the turn of the century, Einstein used this result to support the
theory of Special Relativity. When this became accepted, the scientific community rejected the
existence of the "ether". Thus Classical physicists came to consider the vacuum of space to be truly
empty. The Classical model was only to last until the 1930s when Quantum Mechanics became
accepted. From QM arose a mathematical term in the description of the ground state of any
oscillating system called the "Zero-Point Energy".
>
> The term "Zero-Point" refers to zero degrees Kelvin. Which means this energy exists even in the
absence of all heat. The energy was interpreted as being INHERENT TO THE FABRIC OF SPACE
ITSELF. Dirac showed how electron-positron pair production could arise from the vacuum
fluctuations and Quantum ElectroDynamics was born.
>
> The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle allowed quantum mechanical systems to "borrow" this
energy for short periods of time. The Vacuum filled up with something new and came back into
science not modeled as a material substance but rather as a randomly fluctuating energy field. In
some recent versions of M-theory (mine included), this Field is itself a combination of 2 separate
space-time fields itself. (More on this later, however.)
>
> The question has been raised: does this fit with Relativity? If, so, does it modify Relativity to any
extent?
>
> Now before I continue to answer this question, I first want to state what Relativity actually states.
Simply put, the speed-of-light remains constant at 186,300 miles-per-second in the vacuum.
>
> But Relativity also says more. It says that for a stationary observer ('stationary' here meaning
relatively so as compared to an object being observed), an object moving or accelerating will not
only appear to shrink in length but also any clock reference from the stationary point to that of the
moving object will show a time shrinking effect the faster that object moves. This is all according to
Lorentz formula that predates Relativity from the time Newton's "aether" or "ether "was still
believed in. This effect has been tested to the limits of our capability of velocity at present and
found to match the experiments exactly within error range.
>
> Boyer showed that by invoking the postulate of Lorentz invariance, the spectral energy density p
of the Zero-Point fluctuations must have the particular form as a function of frequency w : p(w) =
kw3 where the constant k is related to Planck's constant as commonly called Planck's Constant
Crossed. This result gives a quantitative basis to the theory of random electrodynamics which
strives to show that quantum mechanical effects arise FROM MATTER'S INTERACTION WITH
THE ZERO-POINT ENERGY.
>
305
> However, when you work out the math, the ZPF should generate an infinite amount of energy.
Yet in Relativity, it doesn't. Something is modifying the vacuum. A similar problem plagues
quantum electrodynamics where infinities are renormalized away. Some type of frequency cutoff is
required to create a finite quantitative theory.
>
> Wheeler applied the theory of General Relativity to the ZPE to create a natural cutoff in his theory
of GeometroDynamics. In General Relativity, the fabric of space curves as a function of energy
density.
>
> When the density becomes sufficiently great, space pinches like it is forming a black hole. This
gives rise to the formation of hyperspace structures that Wheeler called "wormholes". These
wormholes those of us who work with String theory are familiar with. To us they are the event
horizon (so to speak) between 6-D Higg's space-time and our 4-D graviton space-time. We call
them the "Membrane" or "String" depending upon which version you happen to follow.
>
> Wheeler's calculation yielded microscopic channels on the order of 10-33 cm having a (mass
equivalent) energy density of 10+94 grams/cm3 (cubed). Notice how these correspond to the String
scale. The resulting view is that the fabric of space consists of constantly forming and annihilating
pairs of microscopic "mini" blackholes and whiteholes which channel electric flux into and out of
our 3-dimensional space.
>
> These mini-holes manifest dynamics which could be modeled as a turbulent virtual plasma that
Wheeler calls the "quantum foam". In this view, the elementary particles are like bubbles or
vortices arising from the dynamics of the vacuum energy. In my own modification to M-theory, I
showed they can actually be pictured as shell-like extensions of the membrane itself which does
restore the particle concept to the theory and maintains aspects of older models like the dual standing
wave model, the Waveicle from ether theory, the wave-particle model from Einstein's time, and the
Compton Vortex model derived from QM. But like regular M-theory, I do so without the need of
unnatural renormalization.
>
> Recent experiments that utilize the Casimir effect have shown this Zero-Point Field not only does
exist. They have also shown that at least on small scales, we can modify that energy level. We can
actually remove energy from it and produce an area of negative energy density within a localized
region.
>
> But there does remain possible ways to increase this negative energy field. Many have been
proposed. One basic method is to use a factor about the field that is already known to our advantage.
That being that if you add energy into it (such as via heat from a local plasma field), you get a
resulting larger negative energy field. The question isn't a matter of can it be done. It has been
experimented with and shown to work. The question is how to amplify such an effect.
>
> In 1977 the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was given for defining the conditions under which a system
could evolve from randomness toward coherence. The conditions are that the system must be
> (1) far from equilibrium,
> (2) nonlinear in its dynamics
> (3) have an energy flux through it.
>
> These conditions are expressed in general system theory terms. It turns out that the already
published theories of the ZPE can -- under certain circumstances -- fulfill these conditions. Adding
energy into the ZPF via heat is one tested method to force the system or field towards coherence.
What hasn't been tested is how much energy is needed to reach coherence and how this modification
306
to the vacuum affects the speed-of-light as a constant. In theory -- based upon sound math but
untested currently by experiments since we've never achieved a true coherent state yet -- the velocity
of light in such a region should be vastly higher than in our current vacuum state. Indeed, in theory
it could be raised many orders higher.
>
> The odd thing is even any negative energy in a given region should alter C. Why no one to date as
tested this with a Casimir plate setup is beyond me. An actual test could be setup and performed in
even a home situation. Create a semi-circular waveguide just large enough to allow a laser beam to
travel down its lengths. Have the open end of the waveguide open to 2 mm-separated plates of a
length of choice. Have a second laser diode set to fire across through this gap just matching ½
wavelength of the main lasers pulse. Have a detector for the diode laser beam at the other side of the
plates utilized with timing measurement for the passage of the beam across the gap. Have this inside
of a vacuum chamber. Then run your experiment.
>
> The amount of negative energy present can be calculated by force= (π2*h-cross*C/240*a4)A with
a = distance of gap and A = area of plates. This was why I said the size of plates is your choice. The
more area covered, the larger the effect you generate. The separation I chose was connected with ½
wavelength of Hydrogen to remove any natural effects from space around you.
>
> Now the field setup under regular proposed warp programs utilizes a sweeping effect where in
front of the ship a region of compression is formed while behind the ship a region of expanding
space is created. This by what ever field proposal one choices to follow produces a moving frame
situation for the ship whereby it actually moves forward at any given velocity because space itself is
moving. Similar to how our Universe itself expands moving the galaxies along with it.
>
> I have already gone into some of the math behind this. But what I am proposing is a modification
to this approach. That modification is based upon finding an exact field coil configuration that
produces a linear amplification of each coils effect so that the craft while existing in its own spacenormal ZPF condition exists in a sort of cone shaped external field of negative energy region that
expands space behind the craft.
>
> That expansion behind the craft would produce a similar effect to a surfboard riding upon a wave
and take advantage of the craft being surrounded by a region where C no longer equals its current
value. The trick then becomes alignment of the twin field generators so that a narrow point is
formed in front of the ship since any blunt region would produce a shear effect and tend of build up
an energy shock wave that would slow the ship down.
>
> One may have to literally bring the space normal horizon of the inward field up right next to the
back of the craft by pointing the field coils front in towards the craft with their aft section pointed
out unless some means of projecting the whole field can be found. Shape of the craft will determine
how much this must be done.
>
> For right now, I will ignore the issue of producing a linear chain amplification effect. I will
instead go back to one normal proposed field generation method and see how this looks modified
into a single aligned field situation and then combine the results as if we had two field generators
then work on shaping it to the desired outcome.
>
> For sake of not back-tracking in my work, I will utilize one that allows for the generation of such a
field without an undue huge amount of negative energy. Exact energy will have to await
experiments to not only determine each coherence zone but also the possible range of C within such
zones. Then we can better figure out the range of the field across space from each field coil setup.
307
>
> So this method will not be exact. It will simply give us a basic geometric model to work from. In
Hiscock's 2-D calculation, a scalar field could easily be found because of the form the metric took:
ds2 = (1 +2phi/c2)dct2 - dz2/(1 + 2phi/c2). However, I do agree that more than one scalar field
configuration can be derived.
>
> For one, it has already been mentioned in arXiv.org@gr-qc/0009013 5 Sep 2000 "The Warp Drive
: Hyper-Fast Travel within General Relativity" . Miguel Alcubierre University of Wales in Cardiff
UK that metrics can be generated under which less negative energy is required to achieve the
proposed Top Hat field shape.
>
> For two, these metrics have not been shifted in shape to generate the type of field we are seeking
here.
>
> For three, I agree with ZcPhysics in his online comment that we should be able to globally
transform the space-time to that form in 4 dimension which can't be done. The scalar field is a
"linearized" and weak field approximation for this particular form of a space-time metric. The
energy density can classically by arrived at by t^00 = -(7c2/8πiG)(phi,j*phi,j) using Einstein
summation.
>
> Fourthly, I also agree that the 16 other tensor components have never been properly treated from
GR over to this field approach. Nor has this field been honestly looked at from an 11-D perspective
available under M-theory or my own dual time modification to it. Agreeing that those tensors from
GR define the normal composite geometry of space-time that results from the admixture of 6-D
Higg's space-time into 4-D Graviton space-time, let's for sake of argument here only concentrate
upon the 4-D solution then.
>
> In doing a linearized weak field approximation, 4 more restrictions can be placed on the potentials
in linearizing the result that reduces the number of independent potentials to 6. The restriction that
has to be done to linearize the result allows for 4 more restrictions because there remains some
choices of frame. In the end, this still leaves 2 independent scalar potentials.
>
> Fortunately, the Classical result as calculated by the ship frame is that the energy density is given
only by one element of the contravariant Einstein tensor G^00. We know what that is and so we
know what GR says the energy density is. Coordinate frame energy density = T^00 =
(c4/8πG)G^00. Thus we can actually ignore the Scalar component if we so choice because we can
already obtain it from that which we already have.
>
> Now in following a further proposed modification to this field, we will reintroduce a time dilation
term into the ship frame's interval. Only we will use different boundary conditions for it. We will
keep A=1 both at the location of the ship and far from it but allow it to become large in the warped
region. This is achieved by the simplest means possible in my proposed field generation method
since each warp field generator would produce an equal negative energy region.
>
> With the effect focused outward away from the ship slightly by the field coil setup, the actual
inward going portion of such fields would overlap and cancel their effect out in the region of the
ship. This yields a space normal time region which is again restored at the fringes of the outward
going field. From the standpoint of a geometric picture of space-time around the ship and extending
outwards, one has actually created a dual event horizon situation as far as time goes. The inner one
is the shell of the canceled out field inside of which normal time flow is restored. The outer one is
308
formed at the boundary where normal time resumes and within which we have a negative energy
field that allows motion faster than C to exist.
>
> Now if these field generators are placed alongside of the ship in extended position in parallel to the
ship, they would form 2 main elongated spheres of negative energy region with a heart-shaped
blunted front end and a spanning out rear field effect. That blunt front region would create a
disturbance wake in its path through space-time that would literally pile up particles in the ship's
path. That would defeat our purpose and create undue stress on our ship.
>
> But if we place them at a proper angle to the ship, we can narrow that blunt end effect to a finer
point region similar to how the hulls of supersonic aircraft were narrowed to reduce the shockwave
effect of supersonic flight through the atmosphere. Internal-wise, this would produce a wider zone
of space normal time flow in front of the ship than behind.
>
> I also believe that elevating them slight above the plane of the ship would also nearly eliminate
any shock front transfer against the craft's direct line of motion. Sort of like cocking that shock
motion up and away from the craft. This would, however, generate a shock wake behind the craft
that spreads out and disperses as the field reduces in strength towards the outer event horizon. Its
effects on the stability of the coherent modified ZPF would have to be studied further to discover
any ill effects it might produce.
>
> My hunch (without any actual figures) is that quantum effects would cancel such out or dissipate it
through the medium itself by further heating the ZPF through particle pair production. The position
of the craft in relation to its cone shaped field would best be chosen to approximate a craft riding on
the leading edge of a wave crest so as to harness the most forward motion from the field's effects. At
this point, we reduce our discussion to those of main drive system and how to achieve that linear
amplification effect with our field coils.
>
> One thing that must be counted into overall discussion of velocity here is that unlike the original
proposed warp fields, ours would utilize expanding space behind the ship to propel our craft forward
instead of a combination like the "Top Hat" version does. Thus velocity would depend upon the
thrust output of the main drive combined with how fast space behind the craft is spreading out. The
moving frames concept here is unified with its own speed component and that of the initial drive
system. So the faster the main drive can propel our ship, the higher velocity one can gain within
each stable domain. Also the faster one can have the space behind the craft expand the higher a
velocity one can achieve. So now, we have 2 design perimeters to figure into our craft design. That
and the craft's shape.
>
> Theoretical physics depends on the idea of symmetry. Symmetry means certain things do not
change when other things do change. The changes can be passive (i.e. changes in a frame of
reference or point of view POV) or perspective. The changes can also be active as in the
displacement or rotation of an object in space. Symmetries and Conservation Laws are 2 sides of the
same coin.
>
> Translate an object along the straightest path possible in space. If there is a symmetry there, the
linear momentum of the object is conserved. This is force-free motion. Therefore Newton's idea of
"force" really arises as a broken transitional symmetry. Symmetry under displacement in time
conserves the total energy of the displaced object. Symmetry of rotation of an object about an axis
in space conserves the component of total angular momentum along that axis. Torque is a property
of a broken rotational symmetry.
>
309
>In addition to these external symmetries associated with movement in space and time, there are the
"internal" or "gauge" symmetries that cause the electromagnetic force field, the weak force field of
beta radioactive decay of nuclei, and the strong force field that binds quarks into nucleons and
mesons.
>
> The residue of the strong force is the nuclear force that binds nucleons (protons and neutrons) into
the nuclei of atoms. The binding of atoms into molecules, liquids, neutral plasmas of ionized gases
and solid state crystals is purely from the electromagnetic force field together with the Bohm
quantum bit pilot waves of "active information" and a new kind of nonclassical symmetry called
permutation symmetry among identical quantum objects.
>
> Note: under conditions of Dicke "super-radiance" with a lot of fermion photon emitters
concentrated within a single wavelength of the real photon radiation, the fermions "cooperate" -analogous to the Mossbauer effect used in the 1960 Pound-Rebka experiment showing the gravity
redshift -- to mimic a Bose-Einstein "condensate" (Nature, August 16, 2001, p.689, J. Javanainen).
>
> Now when we refer to the idea of coherent states to the ZPF, we are actually speaking of points
were that ZPF as it undergoes a phase transition reaches a symmetry conservation point. Simple
Casimir Plate experiments force the vacuum to reach a lower energy state by the fact that the
placement of those plates prevents some of the normal virtual particles from forming. The idea of
heating that vacuum point is simply a means to increase the excitation of the vacuum itself and thus
to produce a stronger energy negative state within that region.
>
> As the negative energy rises, the field strength of this negative energy increases and thus its reach
across space-time increases. But the fact remains that there should be naturally occurring coherent
regions forming stair steps or domains on the way down towards a literal zero field. I take this from
the Quantum nature of the vacuum as we presently observe it.
>
> Part of the answer to why we have matter in the first place is stability under conditions of
spontaneous broken continuous symmetry whereby those particles reach a coherent state with the
ZPF locally. But that only gives us the baseline for the vacuum in its assumed lowest energy state.
It's assumed to be lowest because it is stable.
>
> However, picturing a deep shelf with a ball sitting on it could be considered stable. Yet with the
right push, that ball could drop off towards an even more stable coherent condition. When we set up
an experiment with those plates we are actually taking a small portion of the ZPF field lower. Doing
the same and heating, the local vacuum region is taking it lower still. Our question is where is the
next coherent range between our present state and the bottom. Normally this would be a function of
temperature too. Our present vacuum is sometimes called a "frozen" vacuum. The closest to the
bottom we can reach would then be Absolute Zero.
>
> For example, the locally ordered (or non-random) field of a laser or a superfluid or a
superconductor has long range phase coherence forming an "interferogram" in space-time that can be
roughly thought of as implicit or "implicate" (Bohm) holographic information storage. This kind of
coherent signal is in stark opposition the random Zero-Point quantum noise fluctuations of the
vacuum and also Classical noise.
>
> Such a coherent long-range phased state is a superposition of different numbers of bosons (either
real or virtual). If virtual, it can be a "superfluid" coherent derandomizing of the Zero-Point
fluctuations of the "normal" component of the quantum vacuum. Indeed, the Higgs mechanism in
which lepto-quarks get their inertial rest mass in the Standard Model is a good example. Though in
310
my own modification to M-theory, this is replaced with a field hidden in 6-D space-time instead of a
regular particle as the Standard Model would propose. But the example shows directly what we are
after here. Finding those states in which the random fluctuations of the ZPF become de-randomized
into a set coherent state.
>
> There is a reason why I seek this out. Those coherent regions should have a definite set velocity
range within each of them while I could generate a field of a set given strength to achieve my
derived effect. Velocity then would simply be dependent upon its negative energy addition to that of
our craft's primary thrust system and the expansion rate of the energy field behind the ship. The
other would literally multiply these by a certain given internal factor.
>
> To give an example, for argument sake lets say in the first case our craft could achieve 0.5C. Let's
say that with the field on our craft could achieve 1C. In this lower coherent range, it might achieve
2C because that region actually multiples or doubles any given velocity to maintain its coherent
condition. Step down to the next coherent zone and we get 4C or 6C depending upon how it
multiples velocity. Now you begin to see what I am after. Letting Nature do some of the extra work
for us.
>
> To locate one such possible point, I need to backtrack into a separate (but related) field of work.
Newton recognized that the fall of an apple, the tides, and the orbits of the planets as aspects of a
single phenomenon -- gravity. Maxwell unified electricity, magnetism, and light. Each synthesis
extends our understanding and leads eventually to new applications. Einstein unified space and time
into one format of space-time. Then he spent the last years of his life seeking to unify Gravity and
the EM field (but to no major avail).
>
> In 1979 Weinberg, Salam and Glashow were awarded the Nobel Prize for their unification of the
EM force with the Weak Force responsible for atomic decay based upon an adaptation of 't Hooft's
renormalization from an earlier developed theory for the Strong Force called Quantum
ChromoDynamics (or QCD for short).
>
> In modern times, we now have String theory and M-theory as the primary avenue towards unifying
the last holdout force Gravity with all the rest. This is based upon supersymmetry which arose after
the success of the other two commonly referenced as the Standard Model.
>
> My focal point for this discussion will be the predicted Quark/Hadron transition range. Let's for
sake of argument here assume its range projected below the normal ZPF field range would equal
such a Coherence zone. Now both energy and temperature can and are expressed using the same
basic unit. The common measure of energy is the electron volt. 1 eV equals 1.6x10-5 joules which
we find used in Physics to describe temperature. This transition range lies at 2-to-3 GeV according
to the standard model.
>
> So let's say the coherence band in the ZPF we are after lies 2-to-3 GeV less than our current
Normal ZPF state. To reach such a state, we need to induce 150-to -00 MeV temperature differences
into the local ZPF. Very reachable by even being heated via a high-power laser.
>
> Now let's perform a renormalization method and say that the normal ZPF state equals a state where
current velocity ranges extend from zero to C. Take the M from MeV and exchange it for 1 million.
Now plug in our current range and shift it 150 to 200 million. Let's say we choose the low side and
put it at 150 million. This gives a velocity increase of 1.5 million times whatever value we plug in
from a space normal condition.
>
311
> This example is not a real one. But it does show how one could find the increase factor. Now let's
try and find a more usable one.
>
> Let's use the same one but focus on a stable state. For the normal, non-transitionaing state of the
proton, the density is 1 GeV per fm3. We know in the normal vacuum this is a stable state. Let's
then see what we find for the electron. We have 500 KeV per fm3. Let's say that at 500 KeV down
the scale from our current ZPF, we have a stable range. If we follow the other example, we'd have
an increase of say C to a velocity of 9.315^10 miles per second with a minimum velocity of 500,000
miles per second. That base then sets slightly higher than 2.683 times our current Max for the ZPF.
>
> Now back to my original example for our proposed ship. If its space normal velocity is .5C, then
its new velocity in this higher domain would be 4.6575^10 miles per second. Here again, you have
to remember no one has found or tested even one of these coherent zones. So none of these figures
are actual. But they do provide a good exercise by which you can get a picture of how
velocity/energy density/temperature could be related.
>
> Basically my own assumption is that if you half the energy density of our current vacuum state,
you double the effective velocity. Under that assumption, those before-mentioned ranges would be
many powers of domains lower than even that. But following the assumption that ½ ZPF would
equal a velocity range from 0.5C to 2C for an equal space normal range of 0 to C, what then remains
to determine is simply how fast the energy density decreases for a given temperature input.
>
> Now in engineering terms, the velocity-of-light in free space c is given by the expression of the
relationship between the magnetic permeability and dielectric permittivity of the vacuum. However,
both of these are controled by the energy density of the ZPF. Thus, altering the ZPF does alter those
two factors.
>
> Now since the dilectric permittivity = 8.854x10-12 F/m and the magnetic permeability = 4x10-7
H/m with C= 1/(µ00)1/2 in the normal ZPF, we do know that the dilectric permittivity changes under
a localized area with the Casmir Effect. In short (as emphasized by Wesson), the speed-of-light c is
context-dependent and not as fundamental as widely believed.
>
> This is the area of most needed research. What we need is a system to generate the Casimir Effect
into a wider localized area of space-time. Usuable velocity increases could be achieved for any
Coherent state where the dilectric permittivity is cut by ½ of greater. But given our present slow
velocity of reaction rocketry, what we need is actually a cut of many magnitudes with the whole
potential velocity scale shifted from its present 0 to C range to one of C to C2.
>
> This then would open up space travel to wider scale potential and allow us to utilize our present
drive systems and still get out of our local neighborhood. At say such a shifted scale, we could
achieve 0.1C. Our upper velocity range would then become 3,470,769,000 MPS or 18,630 times C.
This puts everything under 20,000 LY from Earth with a 2-year or less round-trip mission. Well
within the time scale of some long range planned future missions within our local system.
>
> Remember, this is all simply brain-storming. The only thing we do know to date is that if you
alter ZPF like in Casmir Experiments, you alter the velocity of light. We do not know if we can
increase such a field to cover a wide area. Nor whether we can mold such a field into a usable shape
either along my projected lines of those mentioned in conventional warp theory models that
resemble a Top Hat type field. We do know by the math that one can be made to be stable. But no
one to date has made one of those stable field solutions. Nor have they tried considering we haven't
developed the means to amplify such a field yet. This remains then one huge wide open field of
312
research for those future scientists. But the fundamental ground work is being laid by current
scientists through their work being published on the Los Alamos Archives System.
>
> ZPF History.
>
> The ZPF was first introduced by Max Planck in 1911 as a renewed investigation of the relationship
between matter and radiation or energy as related to a blackbody. The formula is well known that
1/2hv +B(v,t). From this, a quantum oscilator should have a finite ZPF energy even at Absolute
Zero. Einstein-Hopf required a ZPF function in their work only with hv instead of Planck's version.
>
> Nerst in 1916 first proposed a universal ZPF. However, it was Mulliken in 1925 that first
conducted and experimentally proved not only the existance of the ZPF but also provided the first
experimental proof of Heisenburg-Schrodinger Quantum Mechanics. To date, the most dramatic
example of the ZPF being used is its role in maintaining Helium in a liquid under its own vapor
pressure at near Absolute Zero.
>
> The first person to demonstrate by math that C varies under different boundary conditions was
Scharnhorst in 1998 with his work that shows a Casimir effect altered ZPF works as an accelerating
medium. It's this kind of medium that in the last year-or-so was in the news showing light speeded
up and slowed down under certain conditions. Hawking had some on this with his modification
added to Galphabeta so that it equals 8πTalphabeta+U where U is a small term that perturbs the
system from its Classical solution. But it remains Scharnhorst's work that has given us the best
indication that C can be varied.
>
> 1.) The metric g is a sole dynamic field and the theory contains no arbitrary functions or
parameters (apart from the value of the Newtonian coupling constant G) which is measurable in
laboratory experiments. Throughout this, I will ignore the cosmological constant. Although it has
significance for quantum field theory, quantum gravity, and cosmology, on the scale of the solarsystem or of stellar systems its effects are negligible for values ofcorresponding to a cosmological
closure density.
>
> The field equations of GR are derivable from an invariant action principle. Generally it takes the
form Guv=Ruv1/2guvR=8πGTuv. Now some propose Guv(x)+Delta(x)guv(x) = -(8πC4)Tuv(x).
But the normal would actually be for a negative region such that Guv=-(8πGTuv) which yields a
result the same as a normal 4-D model of GR. Only a reversed region or manifold in which gravity
here has been reversed.
>
> My reason for this is that the variance of G with the introduction of U (simular to Hawking's
method) is actually a product of the cosmological factor which for finite local areas is for all intense
zero. To accomplish this, most introduce exotic matter. However, the same general effect arises
within a lowered ZPF condition such that the negative then is accomplished via a subtraction of
normal energy within a given localized region. The negative then becomes simply a matter of
difference.
>
> An example of such a region is that produced by the Casimir Effect since this doesn't create any
major violation of CWC. I believe we can ignore such. I base this upon the fact that even this
negative field (though displaying a fall off effect of 1/r7) does extend beyond the small local region.
Since according to Scharnhorst (and latter verified by other accelerating medium experiments), this
does yield a velocity increase to C without a violation of SR because one is dealing with a special
313
frame of reference, I see no major reason to modify GR to achieve a FTL condition when the normal
method will achieve the same.
>
> All one needs is to treat the reference frame of the ship as a Nulled Region in which the normal
ZPF condition is restored due to two Negative ZPF zones overlapping (i.e., -1*-1=1), then have the
external field non-stationary with respect to the craft and non-symmetriic. If the effect sweeps
backwards in concentric larger areas, the net effect is the same as Alcubierre's method and those
based upon it without the requirement of huge energy factors, nor a violation of any WEC effects.
>
> Basically, you achieve this by changing the space locally into an accelerating medium and have
the ship exist within a region where the reference frames are moving outside of it. Far simpler effect
and requiring far less energy to produce. Especially if a method of enhancing the Casimir effect can
be found.
>
> Gravity vs Anti-Gravity
>
> The speed of gravitational radiation (Cgw) depends upon the specific model of Gravitation that
you use. There are quite a few competing models (all consistent with all experiments to date)
including of course Einstein's but also Brans-Dicke and several families of others. All metric
models can support gravity waves. But not all predict radiation propogation at Cgw = Cem.
>
> There is a class of theories with "prior geometry" in which there is an additional metric which does
not depend only on the local matter density. In such theories, Cgw != Cem in general.
>
> However, there is good evidence that Cgw is in fact at least almost Cem. We observe high-energy
cosmic rays in the 1020-to-1021 eV region. Such particles are travelling at up to (1-10-18)*Cem. If
Cgw < Cem, then particles with Cgw < v < Cem will radiate Cherenkov gravitational radiation into
the vacuum and decelerate from the back reaction. So evidence of these very fast cosmic rays is
good evidence that Cgw >= (1-10-18)*Cem, very close indeed to Cem. Bottom line: in a purely
Einsteinian universe, Cgw = Cem.
>
> In my own model based upon a dual time M-theory of 11-D format, our 4-D manifold is a product
of the overlap of 2 sub-space-time manifolds. In it, Cgw is a product of 2 components. One
componet is negative and the other is positive. In one, the propogation velocity is slightly less than
C. In the other, it is faster than C.
>
> Now in the absence of the first component, space-time would expand at a 7-D level. This is
exactly opposite of the effect that gravity has upon space-time. But it is a condition that only
happens naturally in a mechanism tied to the cosmological constant and dependent upon local matter
density. This does not preclude the usage of artificial means to achieve a simular local effect. One
possible area is altering the local density by altering the ZPF. Another would be canceling the local
effect of the less-than-C component. This could be done possible through a transtation method.
However in either case, this isn't "anti-gravity" in its strict sence. True anti-gravity would require
negative mass.
>
> Now when it concerns EM and GR, the stress-energy tensor is a generalization of the 3dimensional stress tensor developed late in the last century and used by all materials science
engineers to compute stresses in solid materials. It turns out that the force per unit area in the
direction v across a plane with normal n depends linearly on both n and v (i.e., it is measured by a
tensor.
>
314
> Let V be an n-dimensional real vector space with basis {e_1, ... e_n}. A "tensor" is just a
multilinear map such as T: V x V x V* -- R This particular tensor takes arguments u,v,xi where u,v
are vectors and xi is a covector on V. Covectors are linear mappings xi: V -- R. You can think of
u,v as column vectors and xi as a row vector where xi(v) is [ v^(1) ] [ v^(2) ] xi(v) = [x1_(1), xi_(2),
... xi_(n)] [ ... ] [ v^(n) ] (In this context, subscripts in parentheses are often used for the components
of row vectors and superscripts in parentheses for the components of column vectors. Thus v_1 is a
column vector and v_1^(2) is the second component of that vector; xi^2 is a row vector and xi^2_(1)
is the first component of that row vector.)
>
> V* is the space of covectors on V and it too has a basis -- the dual basis o^j defined by { 1 if k=j
o^j(e_k) = { 0 else There are n such basis vectors so V* is n-dimensional just like V. Saying that, T
is "multilinear" means that T( a_1 u_1 + a_2 u_2, v, xi) = a_1 T(u_1,v,xi) + a_2 T(u_2,v,xi) and
similarly for the other 2 arguments. This means that we can completely define the values of T on
any triple u,v,xi by defining its values on triples of basis vectors T^{(i)(j)}_(k) = T(e_i, e_j, o^k)
>
> For given u,v,xi, we can write them as linear combinations of the basis vectors {e_j}: u = u^(i) e_i
= u^(1) e_1 + u^(2) e_2 + ... u^(n) e_n v = v^(j) e_j xi = xi_(k) o^k (where we sum over repeated
indices one up, one down, as suggested in the first line above) and then by the multilinearity
T(u,v,xi) = T(u^(i) e_i, v,xi) = u^(i) T(e_i,v,xi) = u^(i) T(e_i, v^(j) e_j, xi) = u^(i) v^(j) T(e_i, e_j,
xi) = u^(i) v^(j) T(e_i, e_j, xi_(k) o^k) = u^(i) v^(j) xi_(k) T(e_i, e_j, o^k) = T^{(i)(j)}_(k) u^(i)
v^(j) xi_(k)
>
> Notice this is a triple sum over the n3 numbers T^{(i)(j)}_(k). These numbers are the components
of the tensor and are analogous to the n components of a vector or covector. But just as with vectors,
representations of tensors with respect to the basis {e_i & e_j & o^k} of V & V & V* comes with a
price. The components change if we change to a new basis, in a manner completely analogous to the
way the components of a vector change if we adopt a new basis for V.
>
> Suffice it to say that (o^j & o^k)(u,v) = o^j(u) o^k(v) where we have multiplication of real
numbers on the right. The point of introducing tensor products is that it is often convenient to think
about a tensor as a linear map on a new vector space V & V & V* rather than a multilinear map on
V x V x V*.)
>
> If A is an invertible matrix, it provides a coordinate change to a new basis of the vector space V
given by e'_j = A e_j = a_(j)^(k) e_k where a_(j)^(k) are the components of the matrix A. If u =
u^(j) e_j then the new components are given by u = u^(j) A^(-1) e'_j = u^(j) B e'_j = u^(j) b^(k)_(j)
e'_k or (replacing the dummy index k by j') u^(j') = u^(j) b^(j')_(j)
>
> Here, B is just A^(-1) and b^(j')_(j) are the n^2 components of B. This induces a corresponding
change of dual basis o'^j = o^j A^{-1} Note that this gives { 1 k=j o'^j (e'_k) = o^j A^(-1) A e_k =
o^j e_k = { 0 else as required for {o'^j} to give the dual basis to {e'_k}. We must transform the
components T^{(i)(j)}_(k) in order to compute values of T as triple sums over components
expressed in the new basis and its dual.
>
> In analogy with the expression u^(j') = u^(j) b^(j')_(j) for vectors, we have the change of basis
expression xi_(j') = xi_(j) a^(j')_(j) For tensors, this law looks like T^{(i')(j')}_(k') = T^{(i)(j)}_(k)
b^(i')_(i) b^(j')_(j) a^(k')_(k)
>
> I stress once more that for each of the n3 components of T, this is a triple sum over n3 terms. To
make sense of it, get a large sheet of paper and write out all the sums for say the case n=2. The
stress tensor S: V x V -- R thus is associated with n2 components in a particular basis which we can
315
write as a matrix [ s^{(1)(1)} s^{(1)(2)} s^{(1)(3)} ] [ s^{(2)(1)} s^{(2)(2)} s^{(2)(3)} ] [ s^{(3)(1)}
s^{(3)(2)} s^{(3)(3)} ] Here, s^{(1)(3)} (for example) measures the stress across the plane
orthogonal to e_1 in the direction e_3.
>
> These numbers represent all the pressures and stresses in some material at a single point in space.
It is very important that S is a symmetric matrix: the force per unit area across the plane normal to
e_j in the direction e_k equals the force per unit area across the plane normal to e_k in the direction
e_j. This means we can always diagonalize the matrix by a proper choice of basis.
>
> The eigenvalues are called "pressures" and the eigenvectors are the "principal directions" of S.
The stress-energy tensor (or matter tensor) of GR incorporates this stress tensor, fluxes, and energy
density at a single event in space-time into a single multilinear object which is also a tensor T: V x V
-- R, except that now V is E^(1,3). Once again ,we can write it as a matrix:
>
> Density | three flux components
-----------|--------------------------- flux | stress tensor
>
> A vector -field- is a smooth map assigning a vector to each point in space (or space-time) and
similarly for tensor fields. Thus the matter tensor field assigns a tensor (a multilinear map) to each
point in space-time. A change of coordinates on space-time induces a change in basis in the tangent
space at each point in space-time and thus induces changes in the components of the multilinear map
at each event.
>
> If the density also vanishes, the result is considered a vacuum to the extent that it vanishes dictates
the bottom line for that vacuum state. It also determines the propagation velocity of C. For each
particle, there is a local coherent solution to that vacuum. Indeed, our 4-D manifold contains
multiple solutions locally. Some add to that state and others subtract from the ground state.
Globally, these add to a ZPF condition that is at least 120 places smaller than what Classical theory
would predict. That canceling mechanism I have already discussed in my own model and theory.
>
> Now in QM, vacuum fluctuations give rise to a matter tensor of the form [rho 0 0 0 ] [ 0 -rho 0 0 ]
[ 0 0 -rho 0 ] [ 0 0 0 -rho ] I have been at pains to emphasize that strictly speaking, a solution in gtr
must not only satisfy Einstein's field equation G^{(a)(b)} = 8 π T^{(a)(b)} but also the dominant
energy condition which says that when we have chosen coordinates diagonalizing the matter tensor,
the density of mass-energy T^{(0)(0)} must be positive. And moreover must be strictly larger than
the absolute value of the other three eigenvalues (the principal pressures).
>
> In the field equation, note that the Einstein tensor G is computed entirely in terms of the geometry
(by taking a sort of "trace" of the Riemann curvature tensor to get the Ricci tensor R and then
subtracting off a term rather like writing A - t I when defining the characteristic polynomial of A as
det(A - tI).
>
> But lowering the local ZPF does not violate this premise. In all cases, the density issue remains
positive and larger than the principle pressure. So this doesn't call into effect any violation of WEC.
Nor does it require negative mass or anti-gravity.
>
> So the solution to Alcubierre's warp formula that utilize an altered ZPF condition have no reason
to actually have to satisfy any problems raised on the WEC violation. This is also the reason that the
Casimir effect and other accelerating medium effects can exist in the first place without major
structure problems in space-time. They simply do not generate such.
>
316
> SIDE NOTE
>
> I do not know how many here know the formula for capacity. But I have noticed an odd
relationship between this and a Casimir effected ZPF. Basically, if you treat those seperated plates
as plates of a capacitor as the distance of separation, decrease the force due to the Casimir Effect
increases while the capacitance decreases. Thus capacitance follows the energy range of the ZPF
and inversely follows the External force being generated.
>
> All of these are variables controlled by the area of the plates and the separation of the plates. For a
vacuum K in the capacitance formula effectively equals 1 with the formula being C=2.25-7(KA/S)
with A being area and S being separation distance when using inches as our scale.
>
> As an example, with A=0.5 sq. inches and S=0.01 inches, the capacitance =11.3 mf. Plugging
those values into the formula for the force externally generated in a Casimir setup, we get
2.535639415-25 gram per inches squared. I haven't yet tried this with a charge present across the
gap. But I suspect there is a relationship between modifying the ZPF(As such local inertia) and an
EM field.
>
> This might tie in with some who have proposed theories that strong EM Fields counter gravity.
This would be because while gravity curves space-time the EM field would tend to straighten or
stiffen space-time in a local region thus working against gravity. However, my guess is that they are
incorrect and the EM field actually helps curve space-time. An externally-applied EM field present
between those plates would at first glance raise the ZPF -- not lower it.
>
> So perhaps we have here proof that Gravity and EM perform a similar task when it comes to
curving space-time. Which makes sense when one considers that a given amount energy confined
within an area is equal to a given amount of mass in an area.
>
> When the poles of a freely suspended charged capacitor (even in vacuum) were placed on a
horizontal axis, a forward thrust would be produced which would move the capacitor in the direction
of the positive pole. The direction of thrust would reverse in conjunction with a polarity change.
This is the phenomenon known as the Biefield-Brown Effect.
> Now when you examine this effect, it is actually proof of what I was trying to show and not antigravity at all. Those who call it anti-gravity neglect the fact that EM forces far outpower gravity.
Secondly, while a strong charge causes local curvature, the direction of force to that charge will
produce motion on freely seperated plates. If you look at the setup of the Biefield-Brown Effect and
a Casimir Effect and that I mentioned before they are simply copies of each other.
>
> Now when a charge is induced across those plates by direct current, that charge will seek to move
from its negative plate to the positive. And even though it can't move unless that charge is greater
than the local dielectric breakdown voltage, it still produces a force in the direction of that positive
plate. This accounts for that so called anti-gravity result. In other words, it's not anti-gravity at all.
It's simply a matter of force being applied in a certain direction producing thrust. That thrust
ballances at a certain point when its force equals gravities force in that local region. Put in the
simplest terms: when the electron force towards the positive plate equals gravities force downward
in the other direction, the two ballance out and you have levitation - yes; anti-gravity - no. Basically,
I could perform the same task with a small fan thruster whose output exactly matched gravity's push
downward at a given altitude.
>
317
> Thus, I would tend to discount EM fields being able to create anti-gravity effects.
>
> Below is a list of some recognized research links in the first.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/alcwarp - The Alcubierre Warp http://www.geocities.com/einswarp
> - Alcubierre Warp http://members.tripod.com/da_theoretical1
> - Page of Edward Halerewicz http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/warpshel.htm
> - Page of WarpDriveGuy(Simon Jenks) http://www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de/office/alcubierre.htm
...
> - Miguel Alcubierre's Bio http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/warpzero.htm
> - Pfenning and Ford's ideas http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/warpone.htm - Chris Van Den
Broeck's Warp-Bubble http://popularmechanics.com/popmech/sci/9712STSPM....
> - NASA's Anti-Gravity Machine http://popularmechanics.com/popmech/sci/0010STRSCM...
> - Ning Li Electro-Gravity Research article http://www.warp-drive.org
> http://arXiv.org - arXiv.org - Scientific Research
> http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/links.htm - Warp-Drive.org - Useful Links Page
> http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/gravitypaper.html - A Mechanism for Quantum Gravity
> http://arXiv.org/find/gr-qc/1/abs:+AND+warp+drive/... - Warp Drive Query at arXiv.org
> http://www.physics.wustl.edu/~visser - Matt Visser Homepage
> http://pancake.uchicago.edu/~carroll - Sean M Carroll Homepage
> http://www.imo.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~mbaum/poste... - German Explanation for Warp
Bubbles
> http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/lab/nlp/gazdar/teach/at... - British (Sussex University) explanation
> http://www.physics.uoguelph.ca/poisson/mitch/ - Michael John Pfenning Home Page
> http://web.ukonline.co.uk/Members/ad.johnson/astrn...
S-188. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding latest e-mail sorrespondences
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: so you're into "time-travel" now, huh ???
Date : Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:55:14 -0800
At 11:35 PM 1/30/02 -0500, you wrote:
> This sounds like some of the ways people misinterpreted the "Montauk Project" and
alternate words / time-lines. The fact that the Montauk principals did nothing to discourage
this didn't help matters any, and the true facts behind the on-going studies are conveniently
shielded from scrutiny by these whacky claims of "time travel". Tell that guy to go see a
remote-viewer -- they are supposed to be able to traverse space and time. (Or route him to
T.A.P.-T.E.N. or that TIME-TEC (Argentina). Puthoff himself formalized the training
318
programs. The trouble is that it's still more of an art than a science and results are often
unreliable. But the world peer-review magazine "Nature" gave its stamp-of-approval in a
long article on it.
>
> As much as you believe in what you saw demonstrated before your very eyes, I truly am
convinced that there is something to this "consciousness" aspect of post-quantum theory and
how it relates to hyperspace and MQT. That's why the UFOs "blink" on-and-off, sometimes
up close resulting in scaring even seasoned observers out of their wits. That's why the UFOs
seemingly intercept radio transmissions and "blink off" radar screens. I don't think it has
anything to do with RF ... I think -- crazy as it sounds -- that they are almost "reading minds".
That's why the DoD and Navy have awarded contracts to study the effects of the new
hyperspatial geometry on human consciousness. It's an entirely new physics which has
completely stymied even the most radical scientific minds. The only links to the physical
world that I have seen are (1) Lyn Bucanon's famed feat of "influencing" a quantum event in
a laptop computer that ended up "frying" it and (2) the Russians have some sort of "alarm"
that can detect remote-viewing. Over recent years I have come to appreciate and admire
Russian science and engineering. They don't waste money and time on pie-in-the-sky stuff.
>
> I'm like you, though. If I can't measure it, weigh it, see it, then I have trouble admitting its
existence. But I don't have any trouble in believing in God so I am guilty of a double
standard. I think that is the true "magic" of UFO behavior that Corso, Lazar, Dean, Stevens,
Swartz, and others talk about. It's NOT the fantastic maneuvers or the silent propellent-less
hovering. It's these other things that appear as "black magic". Those are what seem to be
many hundreds-of-years ahead of our science. But that doesn't mean we can't reap
immediate benefits from back-engineering what we do understand. If we believe Corso, then
we got fiber optics, lasers, composite materials, integrated circuits and more from crashed
discs. There are reportedly more things recovered that can't be reverse-engineered or
explained, however [see Swartz' article "Technology of the Gods"].
>
> The technology that UNITEL is trying to develop is a quantum leap ahead what has been
back-engineered to-date and is truly revolutionary. I'm very excited to be witnessing its
development. I think there is even more beyond that but -- like you -- I'm too much of a
nuts-and-bolts engineer to know how to tackle that. I think this is what Nichols was referring
to as "artificial reality generation"; why Lazar was prohibited from going into the uppermost
levels of these craft; why members of Bill Uhouse's team said they "would rather ride a
rocketship into Hell than go back in those [crashed] craft"; why Corso said the craft seemed
to be a "physical extension" of the crew inside; and why Sarfatti seems to know what Corso
was talking about and addresses it in his post-Quantum stuff. Did you ever worry that once
you "turned on" the superlattice laser, it would generate a MQT "hole" and just suck itself
into it and disappear into some part of the universe (like in the sci-fi movie "Lost in Space")?
>
> I think there's enough work in your patents to challenge top-notch engineers for years to
get it working. Mankind will certainly be better off because of it. This other "stuff" is best
left to a newer generation of scientists-engineers. I believe in its viability, but I avoid it
because I can't begin to understand it. I think in the final analysis there will be proven a
scientific link between UFO technology, the Philadelphia Experiment, the Montauk "timetravel" stuff, and remote-viewing. I am sufficiently distant from specific endeavors that I can
see the overall "forest" without being consumed by individual "trees". I can really see an
overall "umbrella" of sorts linking all these diverse phenomena together but I can't nail it
down. I doubt that anyone in my lifetime will be able to. But we have more-than-enough on
our hands with next generation technology like UNITEL's!
319
>
> I assume that you haven't heard from anybody I wrote to on your behalf or you would have
told me by now. Off-the-subject a little, I heard a story where an architectural company was
designing a building and sending the specs off to an engineering house in India who would
create the drawings and e-mail them back. They are saving money because of the lower cost
of living in India. Could you use the UNITEL site to advertise your CAD/CAM services in
addition to Andrew's web-designing? Andrew would have to put "META tags" in the html
code so search engines could pick up on it. Just a thought ...
Hi Mark!
I thought you would get a kick out of that weirdo request for time travelers. Indeed it's sad though,
isn't it? In accordance with the last paper I sent you that I forwarded from Bob's paper where I made
comments. In developing and testing our quantum spaceship, we had better (in fact, we MUST!) pay
attention to time dilation and interaction via MQT methods. Then and only then will we find out if we
have a time machine on our hands.
I sent you Dr. J.A. Wheeler's paper talking about him considering an electron being a particle
traveling backward in time (ergo, if we mimic the electron on a Macro level.) And why did the space
vehicles jump Michael and I on two separate occasions? Why us?
Well, we will worry about those problems when we get to the point of building our prototypes. One
would think, however, that our goddamn Government would be concerned about such matters of who
will have a controllable time machine and what will they do with it! What is scary is someone told me
the Japanese and Germans will never forget WWII and would change the outcome if they could!
Good idea about the website and advertising drafting services. We shall see what happens to get the
job done.
Larry
S-189. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Scientific American articles
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Red, Green & Blue
Date : Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:23:04 -0800
Mark:
Since we are in the business of fooling Mother Nature by making her think that our ship & projected
field system is one gigantic electron-positron or electron-hole (exciton) pair, we are at a near stalemate
with many physicists concerning our use of red, green & blue sections that are supposed to mimic the
red, green, & blue quarks contained in an electron. The following is a description by Prof. Gerard
t'Hooft of the QCD system in an article in Scientific American:
>>
320
>> "To explain how three quarks can form a bound state, one must assume that like
charges attract. The theory that has evolved to explain the strong force prescribes exactly
these interactions. The analogue of electric charge is a property called color (although it
has nothing to do with the colors of the visible spectrum). The term color was chosen
because the rule for forming hadrons can be expressed succinctly by requiring all allowed
combinations of quarks to be "white," or colorless. The quarks are assigned the primary
colors red, green, and blue; the anti-quarks have the complementary "anti-colors" cyan,
magenta and yellow. Each of the quark flavors comes in all three colors, so that the
introduction of color charge triples the number of distinct quarks."
>>
>> "From the available quark pigments there are two ways to create white: by mixing all
three primary colors or by mixing one primary color with its complementary anti-color.
The baryons are made according to the first scheme: the three quarks in a baryon are
required to have different colors, so that the three primary hues are necessarily
represented. In a meson a color is always accompanied by its complementary anti-color.
The theory devised to account for these baffling interactions is modeled directly on
quantum electrodynamics and is called quantum chromodynamics. It is a non-Abelian
gauge theory. The gauge symmetry is an invariance with respect to local transformations
of quark color."
>>
>>"It is easy to imagine a global color symmetry. The quark colors, like the isotopic-spin
states of hadrons, might be indicated by the orientation of an arrow in some imaginary
internal space. Successive rotations of a third of a turn would change a quark from red to
green to blue and back to red again. In a baryon, then, there would be three arrows, with
one arrow set to each of the three colors. A global symmetry transformation, by
definition, must affect all three arrows in the same way and at the same time. For
example, all three arrows might rotate clockwise a third of a turn. As a result of such a
transformation all three quarks would change color, but all observable properties of the
hadron would remain as before. In particular there would still be one quark of each color,
and so the baryon would remain colorless."
>>
>>"Quantum ChromoDynamics requires that this invariance be retained even when the
symmetry transformation is a local one. In the absence of forces or interactions, the
invariance is obviously lost. Then local transformation can change the color of one quark
but leave the other quarks unaltered, which would give the hadron a net color. As in
other gauge theories, the way to restore the invariance with respect to local symmetry
operations is to introduce new fields. In Quantum ChromoDynamics, the fields needed
are analogous to the electromagnetic field but are much more complicated. They have 8
times as many components as the electromagnetic field has. It is these fields that give
rise to the strong force."
We first started out investigating what we were shown when the space vehicle landed directly in
front of the four of us that fateful Sunday evening on October 18th, 1981 from 10 feet away. It was
obvious that the "juxt" of what they were trying to show us was the red, green, & blue lens as the ship
landed; turned off its light (revealing that the lens was composed of the 3 equal-part red, green, & blue
tinted lens sections); and then turned on an interior light revealing the inside of the craft which had
nothing in it but a box-like structure. Then after a couple of seconds, the craft flew up and out of sight,
away from us with a shower of sparks trailing from the stern.
Well, we started noticing the significance of the red, green, & blue to t'Hooft's QCD quark design.
Notice the attached illustration which is a modified illustration of a hadron string by Prof. t'Hooft.
321
Michael sent a letter to Prof. t'Hooft and he wished us luck in our project. We immediately thought (and
still do) that there was a connection between the labeling of the quarks with the primary colors and the
primary colors themselves.
Prof. t'Hooft (who received the Nobel Prize for physics last year) thought our design was very
interesting and understands our dilemma of proving that the primary color labeling of quarks may be
more than just "labeling". It may be just as we say -- and what we were shown -- that the colors will
create the strong force (i.e., QCD) effects we want.
Dr. Raymond Chiao later added the fact in a separate Scientific American article about how to
produce a true EM wavepacket; one must have the wavepacket be composed of a minimum of 3 separate
primary colors: red, green, & blue or red, yellow, & blue etc. This added to our growing arsenal of
information. However, we will still get lots of flack about red, green, & blue trying to mimic quarks.
Oh well! If we could just construct our lens prototype, we can prove all of this is true.
Regards,
Larry
>>And why did the space vehicles jump Michael and I on two separate occasions?
Why us?
you wrote:
>
> I think the current fervered interest in hyperspace and "extra" dimensions means the
powers-that-be are convinced of their existence and are subtly encouraging development of
the theories. These dimensions would make MQT possible and -- as Lazar said -- linear
speed has no meaning anymore and Einstein's SOL limit does not apply. I think all is not
fine-and-dandy, though, that they've experienced problems with volunteers going crazy when
"entering" these holes. Maybe there is something to these alternate time-lines and "deja vu"
existences. Maybe time is not an absolute either. I never bought it, but I think that's what
that popular book "The Holographic Universe" was trying to say. I wonder if Dr. Wheeler
ever updated his Many Worlds theory with these new theories about time, consciousness, and
reality. I myself try to avoid it because I'm too biased against things I can't feel or measure.
>
>
>>
>>Well, we will worry about those problems when we get to the point of building our
prototypes. One would think however, that our goddamn government would be
concerned about such matters of, who will have a controllable time machine and what
will they do with it? What is scary is, someone told me the Japanese and Germans will
never forget WWII and would change the outcome if they could!
> I don't mean to make this sound dramatic. But I can't help but wonder if -- for reasons
unknown to us -- you guys were "chosen" by the ETs, much the same way as certain ordinary
individuals (at least 'ordinary' to the world-at-large) were given a mental image of where the
giant mothership was going to land in "Close Encounters". Much of the script was allegedly
based on stories that had been passed around for decades. I think a lot of scriptwriters get
their ideas from paranormal or ET related folklore, like the movies "Contact", "Scanners",
"the Matrix", "Dreamscape", and of course "ET". Regarding you two, it looks like the ETs
made a good choice because even after all these years and adversity, you have given up the
322
ship yet! Had I myself not accidentally picked up that Astronomy magazine with Kaku's
article, or just happened to see the DATELINE interviews with Corso and Morehouse, I
wouldn't be writing this e-mail now. I wonder about my un-planned "role" in all of this
sometimes.
>
>That is one of the popular side stories about the Montauk Project. That in addition to
viewing past and future events, some of the researchers tried to engineer realities where we
won the War with less casualties and so on. They made some mistakes and created realities
(I don't know how stable or long-lasting they were) where the other side won and where both
sides annihilated each other. Nichols said we're living in a "time loop" between 1943 and
2003 that would appear to be irreversible. Who knows? Maybe the Montauk Project and the
Everett/Wheeler "Many Worlds" theory inspired the tv series "Sliders".
>>
>
>I read an article about how companies were using the Internet to do business. Since
competition is tight, this one company was able to underbid others by having the e-mailing
the specs to a company in India who -- because of cheaper lager wages -- produced the
engineering blueprints at minimal cost. (Of course that would go down-the-tubes if they
started imposing tariffs on such web traffic.) The problem with search engines is you have to
pay a hefty price for the better ones to carry you. My brother-in-law operates his own civil
engineering consulting company and complains that they always put his company at the
bottom of a long search list that is headed up by the more prosperous firms. Google's policy
is the ones who get the most "hits" are awarded the highest positions on the list. So unless
you can come up with some unique "key phrases" (CADD, CAM are not "unique" ... there's
probably a million companies with those words) …
>
> -- Mark
Good idea about the website and advertising drafting services! We shall see what happens to get the job
done.
S-190. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL comments on Michio Kaku's reponses to questions
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: Kaku's stand on UFOs
Date : Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:40:49 -0800
At 02:57 PM 1/31/02 -0500, you wrote:
>
> I returned to that new link that Dave Kauble put up on Deb's "NEWS" page (
http://www.debshome.com ) for the real-time interviews with Kaku and Pope concerning
UFOs. Once I got the ABC Science index, I searched for "Kaku". It returned a bunch of
archived chats and interviews. You might see evidence of his "double-standard" concerning
UFOs at
http://search.abcnews.go.com/query.html?qm=0&ct=0&rq=0&qt=kaku&Submit3.x=15
&Submit3.y=11 .
323
Mark:
I suppose our little story and our patented design for a spaceship blows Kaku's story all to Hell, doesn't
it? I have some inserts on his statements below:
>>
>> "Science or Sci-Fi?" Chat with physicist Michio Kaku Nov.,'02
>
>> UFOs -- science fact or science fiction? What are the plausible scientific theories that
support the existence of UFOs? Are there real-life physics behind the concept of a flying
saucer? How do they fly? How could they travel through time and space?
>
> Chris Wallace looks at these questions in the latest edition of his Internet Exposé: “UFO
2000: The Search Continues.” In this Webcast, Wallace interviews Michio Kaku, an
internationally-recognized authority in theoretical physics and the environment.
>>
>> Kaku is the author of 9 books, the last two of which (Hyperspace and Visions) are
international best sellers. Michio Kaku joined us in an online chat today. The chat transcript
is below:
>>
>> Moderator at 1:56pm ET
>> "Welcome Dr. Michio Kaku. David Wohlfarth from tnt21.atl2.da.uu.net at 1:56pm ET :
"Hello Dr. Kaku. My question is what the difference is between folding space and
wormholes?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 1:57pm ET: "Folding space and wormholes are the same thing. In
science-fiction, a great distinction is made between the two. But from a mathematical point
of view, they are the same. If I take a sheet of paper, fold it in half, and then punch a hole
through this folded sheet of paper, this is sometimes called 'folded space'. However, a
mathematician would call this a simply-connected manifold. So mathematically speaking,
they are the same." Moderator at 1:58pm ET
To study this concept and how it relates to the UNITEL spaceship, see "How to Visualize Surfaces in
three-Dimensional Manifolds" by Jeffery R. Weeks and "Fiber bundles and Quantum Theory" by
Bernstein & Phillips, Scientific American, July, 1981, pg.122 which introduces the reader to Riemannian
geometry on surfaces and then applies the ideas to Physics.
>> RJ asks: "Do you think that most people are thinking the wrong way when it comes to
"traveling" great distances in space? Isn't it feasible that overlapping or intersecting
dimensions can be purposely breached thus allowing movement between them for those who
have realized that the "physical" world goes beyond our ideas about the limits of Physics?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:00pm ET: "This could be true. Most scientists giggle when they hear
about UFOs, because the distance between stars is so great. It would take centuries to
millennia for a civilization to navigate even to nearby stars. However, if we have what is
called a type-III civilization, their energy consumption is so great that they might be able to
open up higher dimensions. At present, most -- but not all -- physicists believe there is a
good possibility that we live in 10- or 11- dimensional space. If we can access the Planck
energy, space and time becomes unstable and wormholes begin to open up, giving us the
possibility that we might use these wormholes for transportation to the stars."
324
AKA Monsieur Kip Thorne! What master grandstanders they be! A politician's answer, that's for
sure. Kaku knows who supplies the butter for his bread. Gain popularity by leaning to the Left but
staunchly stand on the Rright, of course.
Of course, they would run and hide from hardcore math proving their stance on the WKB Approx.
and the latest very important papers from world-class physicists and aerospace researchers presenting
proof that MQT is indeed possible. These kind of people that make an effort to appear avante-guard in
their demeanor to gain attention only in reality to take a conservative "no contest" stance as they spew
all but Classical, conservative physics views on something that can not be proven until funding is spent
to construct and test prototypes.
Like Sarfatti, Kaku is basking in the fact that these advanced propulsion concepts are not proven and
may never be proven. I wonder what his reply will be when UNITEL constructs it's prototypes and they
work. Of courser much to his dismay, he will probably not have much to say. You know he won't say
that he was counting on UNITEL's failure and was playing the odds that are not in our favor. These
odds are growing more-and-more in our favor as time goes by. The aerospace propulsion concepts that
UNITEL advances is getting more support from the world scientific community with more-and-more
technical feasibility is discovered everyday.
>> Moderator at 2:02pm ET: "You say in your interview on this Web Show that ours is
likely not a very advanced civilization, that we are a Stage zero civilization. What
characteristics would be classified as Class III or of the highest? What would these beings be
able to do? What would they look like? Would they be composed entirely of brain-matter?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:04pm ET: "A Type I civilization controls all forms of planetary power.
They control the weather, earthquakes, volcanoes, and the ocean. A Type II civilization
controls the power of a star. They can manipulate and play with stars. A Type III civilization
is galactic. They have colonized most of the stars in the galaxy. On this scale, we are type
zero. We get our energy from dead plants (i.e., oil). We physicists believe that in 100-to-200
years, we will attain Type I status. However, to have warp drive, you must be an advanced
Type I, II, or III civilization."
>> Bryan P. at 2:05pm ET : "Mr. Kaku, if high-speed interstellar travel was possible, what
method do you think looks most promising? Is propulsion the only way? Are we possibly
looking at this problem the wrong way?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:08pm ET: For sub-light speed velocities, our best hope lies in laser sails
and ramjet fusion engines or perhaps anti-matter engines. All these technologies will take at
least a century to develop. And even then, we will only attain perhaps half the speed-oflight. I believe that the first star ship may be a nanoprobe (perhaps the size of your fist)
which will use nanotechnology to miniaturize its propulsion systems. To exceed the speedof-light, you must necessarily drill a hole in space or compress space. Either way, you have
to be at least Type II or III civilization to exceed the speed-of-light."
Boy! is this guy Kaku behind on technology or what! The Solar Sail project is all but defunct along
with the (very ancient) ramjet design. The anti-matter idea is by far more ridiculous than MQT because
it costs a $trillion a gram to create and store anti-matter. It was calculated that it will require 100 lbs. to
travel to the nearest star that would not be reached for at least 110 years!
325
I think that since Kaku is so sure that MQT will not work because of the WKB Approx., he has taken
such a solid stance that he has killed his goat over (being against MQT). He is now the leader of the
scientific community that is against the hypothesis of MQT and he can't go back to being an open,
purely scientific researcher anymore. It would make him and his polished reputation a liar, fraudulent,
untrustworthy or worse.
Again, I find our 80s' science heroes like Kaku and Kip Thorne basically selling out to the old hat
science. They gained a little popularity and then moved to maintain a conservative stance. They might
have just as well not even discussed the possibilities of wormholes, etc.
>> Dan B. from eas.asu.edu at 2:08pm ET: "Dr. Kaku, in Hyperspace you assert that the
laws of Classical physics and Quantum physics are unified when taken in 10 dimensions.
Has this (untestable) theory been accepted by the physics community?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:11pm ET: "At present, there is only one candidate for a theory which
can unify all of Physics. This is the 10-dimensional superstring theory. It has no rivals. No
other theory can make the claim of unifying all the forces of the Universe. At present, the
theory cannot be tested. However, in the next decade, new machines may be powerful
enough to detect super particles which are low vibrations of the superstring. In Geneva, we
have the LHC (the Large Hadron Collider). We hope it may be possible to create lower
vibrations of the super-string with this machine in this decade, and, hence, partially verify
this theory. If verified, it will be the ultimate theory -- the Theory of Everything."
Right. At least he has some complacency for his fellow researchers and their proposed research that
will prove these important concepts. Feeling a little guilty so he shows a little openness towards these
possibilities. Most likely a tease to maintain his charisma for his popularity poll.
>> Red at 2:11pm ET : "What is your estimate on how many other civilizations are out there
like ours, living on planets like ours."
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:14pm ET: "Professor Frank Drake estimated 40 years ago that there
might be about ten thousand planets in our galaxy with intelligent life. Carl Sagan re-did
Drake's calculation and estimated perhaps millions of planets may have intelligent lifeforms.
Since then, new data indicate that the conditions for Life are much rarer in our Galaxy than
previously thought. Life in the Galaxy must meet a stringent set of conditions so stringent
that perhaps only a few hundred planets in the Galaxy have intelligent life. However, there
are trillions of other galaxies. So, therefore, I believe that the probability of other intelligent
lifeforms in the Universe is nearly 100%."
So, ergo, let's not put any faith in UFOs and the possibility of REAL space travel? Typical
contradiction. But it is obvious that he wants to appear to lean to the Left for his popularity poll.
>> Moderator at 2:14pm ET: Prel Freg asks: "You say that these beings might consider us so
primitive that they regard us as "ants" that are not even worthy of sharing technology with.
But isn't it likely that they would at least consider us worthy of study? Can you comment on
how they might be actually observing us. Perhaps from a station on the dark side of the
Moon?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:16pm ET: "Some physicists believe that we already have been visited
by a Type III civilization. The most efficient way to explore the Galaxy is to send self326
replicating robot probes to land on distant moons. Moons have no erosion or rust and the
probes can last for millions of years. These probes -- like a virus -- create millions of copies
of themselves to land on other moons. Therefore within 100,000 years, you can probe an
entire galaxy. On our own Moon, there could be a probe left over from a passing Type III
civilization waiting to be discovered. This was the basis of the movie '2001'."
Squarebutt info. He's safe with that comment!
>> Moderator at 2:17pm ET: Dan asks: "With the recent exponential advancements in
science and technology, do you foresee a day when man will travel faster-than-light? And if
so, what do you think the time frame would be?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:19pm ET: "I think within a century, we will have miniature probes
which can attain perhaps half the speed-of-light. However, to exceed the speed-of-light may
take thousands of years until we become a Type II civilization. We are, perhaps, 100 years
away from attaining Type I status. We are perhaps several thousand years away from
attaining Type II status. And perhaps a hundred thousand years away from attaining Type III
status. In outer space, that is a twinkling of an eye."
Sorry, Dr. Kaku. Let us talk about our sightings in 1981 and our design. Care to call us liars? Or
frauds perhaps? Well now, we have patents, Police and FBI sighting reports over the skies of Eugene,
OR, universities, International aerospace organizations, worldclass scientists, on and on....
He is saying several thousand years and we were shown with working crafts that this was happening
in 1981. Does he have a crystal ball? Or perhaps Madame so-and-so on TV has read his and our future?
I wonder if someone would have to hold him down to force him to check out all the facts concerned with
our spaceship design. I just don't think he will want to look and will probably want it all to just go
away!
>> Alfredo Argueta at 2:19pm ET: "Of all the fascinating forecasts you made in Visions,
which one do you believe will have the deepest and most lasting impact on human life?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:21pm ET: "Perhaps the most profound prediction in my book is when
we humans control our own genetic heritage. This means, for example, controlling the aging
process and being able perhaps to double or triple the human lifespan. Within 20 years, we
may have the first technologies proven in the laboratory which can begin to extend our
lifespan. Within a century, this could become commonplace. If so, this will create a
profound demographic and social shift in the nature of the human race."
That's right, best stick with medical aspirations. Even if it is more crystal ball stuff.
>> Moderator at 2:21pm ET. Jim Long asks: "What is the quantum vacuum? And how does
it relate to FTL travel?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:24pm ET: "Some physicists (a minority) believe that the vacuum
possesses vast quantities of energy called "Zero-Point" Energy. The first person to call
attention to the vacuum energy was Nikola Tesla. However, he could not prove that the
vacuum had energy.
>>
327
>> "Zero-Point Energy has been observed in the laboratory. This is called the 'Casimir
Effect'. It is extremely small. So small that it is useless for space travel. However, a Type II
or III civilization might be able to harness the vacuum energy to compress space and attain
warp drive. In Scientific American magazine a few months ago, there was a detailed article
about how the Casimir effect might give us warp drive. But the authors were careful to say
that it would take an extremely advanced technology to harness the Casimir effect for warp
drive (i.e., a Type II or III civilization)."
Unless UNITEL builds its spaceship which announces the premises that 'micro' is 'Macro'. Mother
Nature doen't care whether the particle system is microscopic or as big as an aircraft carrier. The
manmade cigar-shaped, hard deformed nucleii found in U-237 & U-238 are proof of that as they are
hundreds of times larger than normal nucleii. There is a vast amount of energy available in the ZPE.
Our ship system will just be another particle system floating in the ZPE sea and will be able to borrow
energy to perform MQT. We intend to prove this as soon as we can. Hal Puthoff has put much effort
into recognizing this (that 'micro' is 'Macro') (sort of as we must maintain decoherence like quantum
computer design).
>> Columbia.edu guy at 2:25pm ET: "What do you think of UC Berkeley's SETI program?
And do you feel the constant listening to signals will turn up anything of use?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:27pm ET: "The SETI at Home project from Berkeley has harnessed
almost a million pc's to search for intelligent life in the universe. Go to their web page and
your PC can also be used to look for intelligent life in the universe. However, the signals
they are looking for are simply too primitive to explore all the stars in the Galaxy. Plus,
aliens may not broadcast on the frequency detected by SETI at Home. Therefore, I am
pessimistic that they will discover intelligent life because their equipment is too primitive. I
do not believe that we should send signals in space to communicate with aliens. This could
be very dangerous unless we understand their intentions."
Now I have to agree with Kaku on this one. The aliens won't pay any attention to any 2-dimensional
noise. But just wait until we fire up a gigantic quantum particle system that would interact with higher
dimensions!
>> Russell at 2:27pm ET : "You state that it will take thousands of years to attain type 2
status. Do you think that the resources on Earth will sustain humanity for that long?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:29pm ET: "We physicists -- when calculating when we will attain
Type II or III status -- only assume that our energy consumption grows at around 3 percent
per year. Even though this growth rate seems very small, over thousands of years you can
calculate that we will have the power of a star or even a galaxy. The Earth as a single planet
may not be able to sustain this growth over thousands of years. Therefore we may have to
terraform nearby planets in order to maintain this growth rate. Personally, I don't believe we
should have a crash program to put men on Mars. Robots are cheaper and better. However,
over thousands of years, it may become feasible to terraform Mars."
Right!!! Wait until de' big asteroid come! Den' poor old Michio should deserve his rightful place to
escape de' holocaust and go to Mars!
328
>> Moderator at 2:30pm ET: Pituka Heilbron asks: "In simple terms please, what happens
with the time once we leave the Earth's atmosphere? Is there time in space?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:32pm ET: "Yes, there is time in space. Some people have written that
time does not exist. They are probably quacks. They are not working scientists; they are
mainly philosophers and amateurs. We scientists believe that any theory should be
measurable and testable. Time can be measured. Einstein's theory has been verified millions
of times. Any new theory must, therefore, build on top of Einstein's theory and not tear it
down. That's where superstring theory comes in. Superstring theory is the first major theory
to improve on Einstein's theory in this century."
Yeah, Michio. But let's not apply string theory to space travel like UNITEL has. Dat's wrong, boss!
>> Douglas Thompson at 2:32pm E : "What major steps technologically does Mankind have
to take to attain a Type I civilization?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:34pm ET: "We will naturally attain Type I status unless we pollute
ourselves to death. The Internet, for example, is a "Type I" telephone system of the future.
English will be the language of this type one civilization. The European Union is one piece
of a type one economy. The culture of this Type I civilization unfortunately will be MTV,
rap music, blue jeans, and news culture."
What? Blue jeans? Kind o' like his book Hyperspace! Never mind a FEASIBLE space
transportation system based on the same sound scientific principles! Any other cool predictions?
>> MikeM at 2:34pm ET: "If Mankind were to discover, perhaps by "listening" to signals
from space that other intelligent life definitely did exist, what do you think would be
Mankind's reaction?
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:36pm ET: "I think our immediate reaction would be to have a heart
attack. As Arthur C. Clarke once said 'If aliens exist or if aliens don't exist, either way it is a
frightening thought. If aliens don't exist, then we are alone. And that's very scary. If we are
not alone, that's even scarier because look at the history of what happens when different
civilizations collided in the last 400 years.' I think most people will be shocked out of their
minds if we pick up a signal from an intelligent life form in space."
Well, let's get "shocked out of our minds" then, Michio, because de' big ship has done landed in
Eugene, Oregon in 1981-82. Frankly, I got over my shock and near heart attack and decided to start
designing a space ship of our own! Den we can say "Hey, gee thanks Mr. Spaceman! Thanks for
showing us a real spaceship up close". Obviously, Kaku has labeled everyone that has seen a UFO as
crazy, liar … you know the routine. We shall see what happens after we build!
>> Moderator at 2:36pm ET: "Dr. Kaku, thank you for joining us today. Do you have any
final thoughts?"
>>
>> Michio Kaku at 2:36pm ET: "I would just say that for further reading, see my web page
at www.mkaku.org and also my books Hyperspace and Visons."
>>
329
>> Moderator at 2:38pmET : "Please take a moment to check out the latest installment of
Chris Wallace's Internet Exposé: 'UFO2000: The Search Continues.' Thank you, Michio
Kaku, for joining us."
S-191. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL reflecting on attitudes and motivations of others
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: your review on Kaku
Date : Fri, 01 Feb 2002 12:55:03 -0800
Hey Mark:
I am not sure about the disk stuff. I had a brief experience where I "thought" I saw some disks. But
I am not sure enough to make any positive statements about the incident. On the other hand, I am very
positive about our design we are ready to build. It wasn't me by myself. I was with other individuals
along with the whole town of Eugene (including the police) saw the craft from very close up. Michael is
quite positive that we can produce a working model of his disk design. But I think it would only water
down our hard work and design for our cigar- teardrop shaped craft.
I do, however, unlike Kaku respect others in their explanations and sightings and so forth of the
various UFOs. I try to keep an open mind about what they are saying and do remain somewhat agnostic
about the situation. I give them the benefit of the doubt and respect them as they may be telling the
truth.
Concerning my situation, I have never ever seen something that wasn't there. And being trained in
the engineering field, I above anyone else should know the difference between a ball of gas or Kytes
with candles etc. and the real machine. Especially when others are screaming from the sight of the craft
ten feet from us (closest I ever came to a heart attack!).
So I am not taking 'no' for an answer from Kaku and/or Captain Ellidge at Edwards AFB saying that
"we will never see a craft of this type in our lifetimes". I wonder what would they think if we were
shown this craft because a big asteroid is coming to destroy the Earth soon. For the first time, we may
sway the public to think like we do. Like the actor Struther Martin in the movie "Cool Hand Luke"
when he said "They have to get their mind's right" (hee hee :-) and understand that we aren't farting out
the stern anymore and there will be no wings needed in space!
The strength of attraction of our ship to field is 39 orders in magnitude stronger than one G. That's
1039 stronger! Try and match that with fuel- even anti-matter! The strong force between a particle and
its anti-particle (electron-positron) pair was described by Harold Fritsch as like trying to take a child
from its favorite toy!
See inserted comments below …
At 07:45 AM 2/1/02 -0500, you wrote:
> Larry ->
330
> It may be advantageous that I am not expert in these complex areas of physics. It has
enabled me to sit back and view the "forest" unfolding rather than get involved with the
evolution of specific "trees" contained within that forest. I can see loose threads binding all
these different phenomena together. It's like a giant jigsaw puzzle with some of the original
pieces lost forever with other "bogus" pieces thrown into the mix. I think enough clues are
there for someone with a lot more deductive reasoning powers than me to solve it.
>
> The most basic thing that can't be swept under-the-carpet is all those past UFO sightings
that occurred before the age of digital trickery. If you take that as a starting point, you work
backwards and see what theories fit. They blink 'on' and 'off' out of apparent existence. Are
we talking about opticial "cloaking" here or MQT? Probably both. As you told me in your
very first e-mail (when your site was down for "reconstruction"), MQT is the only viable
method for achieving interstellar travel.
If Kaku accepts that for his fist-sized
nanoengineering starship, then why not scale it up to a practical size? If the legends are true,
that has already been done (with disastrous mental side-effects to the crew) in the P-X, either
using the traditional tale of radar-invisibility (von Newmann & Tesla) or Chica's and King's
reports of actual "teleportation"/backward time-travel (Tesla & Teller). The Montauk thing
is a separate issue which is probably continuing at what was rumored to be taking place at
"S-4" as "Project Looking Glass".
>
>The only things they used to discredit Lazar with were his lying about his academic
credentials, his bankruptcy, and his helping a brothel madam to computerize her records.
Therefore -- according to Campbell and Mahood -- EVERYTHING Lazar said was false.
That's just plain ridiculous. Lazar was a competent nuclear physics lab technician who got
fired from his contractor job at Los Alamos because he was spending too much of his work
time and the facilities equipment on his personal projects (like the famous "jet car" he
invented and was widely-publicized). The government is pissed-off at him for tipping the
public off about Area-51 and all its nuances. I think Lazar is a lot like your associate Mike
Miller in that they show you don't necessarily need a formal education to understand new
concepts in physics. (You probably will suffer in the applied math, though. Mahood takes
delight in pointing out that Lazar can't solve even a basic differential equation..)
>
>Whether he actually worked on this stuff personally -- or whether he is just reporting what
had been passed on to him (granted, that could be disinformation) -- I believe that he is
telling what-he-knows without fabrication. Mahood indirectly corroborated Lazar's story by
saying one his remote-viewer friends "saw" 9 empty hangers built into the side of the
Papoose mountains just where Lazar said they were. They've already confirmed the
existence of Elements 118 and 116. Lazar said 116 was produced when 115 was bombarded
with protons and transmutated into 116 which subsequently decayed and released an antiproton in the process. Because that particle interacted immediately with a target gas in an
annihilation reaction, there was no need for any type of magnetic confinement bottle. What
is more "magical" to me about 115 is the strong force that allegedly was "tapped" to produce
a repulsive force or generate a (MQT) distortion. Lazar said you could back-calculate the
frequency of this "gravity wave" from the dimensions of the waveguide, but he wanted to
keep that to himself for the time-being.
>
>But you're right ... all of this is pie-in-the-sky because it's impractical to produce antimatter. UNLESS you can find stuff like 115 already made. Then you have a ready source of
anti-matter on-demand. Did Yoshari ever speculate on how he was going to generate the
anti-protons for his small on-board reactor?
331
I think he was suggesting an off the shelf item that is a small-enough, powerful-enough powerplant.
It was his advice that the proton exchanger was the right choice back in '97. But we may have a better,
more powerful, more concise powerplant available today to choose from.
>I might also try some "black" companies like EG&G and Bechtel. Can't hurt ... I've tried
everywhere else. I may also e-mail George Lucas's Special F-X company. Sooner-or-later
this stuff has to be elevated to where someone of importance takes notice. In the meantime
I'll go back to your e-mails and select some to put in a document which will further establish
your case. You have some excellent material in those and they were a real eye-opener to me.
You certainly have left no stone unturned as you've contacted the leading experts in these
fields. That in itself has to say something about your convictions. I don't understand why
others can't see this ...
I can't understand it either. Now we are forced to publish our book to try to bring in funding for us
as I am certain the Public will love our material. Especially if it's done right. So we are in the business
of making films and selling books. So be it! Things will accelerate after the Public is familiar with us
and our design.
S-192. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding response to Bob Drake's memo
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Re: Note - the universe is about 15 billion years old & earth is only b million years old
Date : Fri, 01 Feb 2002 12:56:27 -0800
> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 11:43:56 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Note - the Universe is about 15 billion years old & Earth is only b million years old
>
> Bob:
>
> Yes, hopefully someday soon we will be ready to send an MQT ship. One each to the areas that
are high probability of a habitable planet to further mankind to populate and expand in the new
frontier. I think we have to be positive about this and keep an open mind concerning everyone's
efforts to develop a feasible MQT spaceship. I get a little upset at the negative views and opinions
such as the one I sent with Dr. Kaku and I added some rude comments of my own in response. The
following work is very valuable in the hope that we truly will someday send ships to contact and
explore such possibilities.
>
> Regards,
> Larry
> At 06:21 PM 1/31/02 -0800, you wrote:
>> Larry,
>>
332
>> The purpose of this email is to provide perspective relating to how the earth's sun and
nearby planets relate to the known universe. Within this known universe, what do you think
the odds would be of finding intelligent life?
>>
>> There are about 200 billion stars in our (Milky Way) galaxy, and I have heard there are
about 100 billion galaxies in the known universe. If each of the galaxies averages about 100
billion stars, this would mean there are about 100 billion times times 100 billion stars in our
universe. If I figured it correctly, that number would be a 10 to the 21st power (or 10 with 21
zeroes behind it).
> Yes, Bob. And the strength of attraction of our projected field to our proposed spaceship (QCDStrong force) is 1039 the strength of one G (39 zeros after it!). Try and match that with conventional
action-reaction rocket or jet power!
>> The National Geographic Magazine printed a fold out called "Journey Into The Universe
Through Space And Time" in 1983 and is used as the reference material for the information
shown below:
>>
> What is the magnitude of our known galaxy? (Note: A light-year equals 5,878,500,000,000
miles or 5.9 trillion miles).
>>
>> 1. Sun and near planets (Sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth) has as a circumference of 0.000016
light-years,
>>
>> 2. Sun's neighbors which form a Globular Cluster (about 20 stars including Alpha
Centuri, Sirius, Lalande, etc.) has a circumference of 20 light-years.
>>
>> 3. Milky Way Galaxy which is made up of Globular Clusters (including the Sun's
neighbors) has a circumference of 50 thousand light-years.
>>
>> 4 . Local Group (includes the Milky Way Galaxy as well as some 19 other galaxies
including Draco, Andromeda ) (also referred to as "this sector of space") has a circumference
of 2 million light-years.
>>
>> 5. Local Supercluster (includes clusters of galaxies including our Local Group) ("like
fleets of ships--congregate in superclusters) has a circumference of 75 million light-years.
>>
>> 6. The Known Universe (includes our Local Supercluster) ("In whatever direction we
look into deep space, we can detect clusters of galaxies and superclusters, all moving away
from us. Toward the observable horizon, we see quasars-quasi-stellar objects-and the
uniform glow of the Big Bang. There is no center; any observer anywhere would see the
same effect. The Universe is isotropic. That is, it looks the same in every direction. Quasars
(the most distant objects yet observed) are among the most curious and the most energetic.
Each of the brightest quasars emits the energy of hundreds of galaxies from a volume far
smaller than the Milky Way. Each is probably a violent nucleus of a distant galaxy. The
furthest quasars are rushing away from us at more than 90 percent the speed-of-light."): Has
a circumference of 20 billion light years.
333
S-193. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding MQT and Josephson's Junction mechanisms
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kaku's stand on UFOs
Date : Fri, 01 Feb 2002 18:02:40 -0800
> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 18:01:34 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Kaku's stand on UFOs
>
> Hi Bob:
>
> I thought you may enjoy the following article from Alan Chuang/IBM. If it is indeed possible to
fool Mother Nature with our proposed spaceship as a gigantic fake electron-hole pair, then perhaps
we can transfer the boson pair to where ever we wish to travel to via MQT Josephson's Junction
mechanism. Remember it was Stephen Weinberg (Univ. Texas at Austin) that proved that our
universe is one gigantic potential barrier. i.e., Space-time is in its own essence a potential barrier
whether it is a billion light-years across it or one milli-micron across. It doesn't make any difference.
>
> John Wheeler told us we would have to have such a tremendous amount of energy (1/3 fractional
charge) at the surface that it may tear the craft apart in order to attempt at mimicking an electron as
an electron. We will put a hot enough spark on the surface all right with our Niobium-Titanium
exterior charged hull. The capped-cone shape provides a stability zone that makes our ship act and
appear to Mother Nature as a gigantic particle. The integrity patterns with the reaction-diffusion
mechanism (Turing) interacting with the ZPE, the ship could interact just as an electron and borrow
extra-energy from the ZPE to tunnel. These integrity patterns provide the quantum information to
match the pair phase to the other side of the tunneling junction to go where you would want to go.
>
> Make sense? I am going to add some stuff from Minami, Jerry Bales, Dave Froning, and others to
show how their additional tunneling information has been applied to a feasible space propulsion
system.
>
> Regards,
> Larry
>> Josephson Junctions
>>
>> "In 1976, Brian Josephson discovered that when 2 superconductors are placed in a close
proximity together or separated by a thin insulating barrier, a current is still able to pass from
one superconductor to another. The apparatus is called a Josephson junction. And the
phenomenon of current passing through the barrier is called 'tunneling' or the 'DC Josephson
effect'."
>>
>> "To understand why tunneling occurs, we need to first understand electrons. Just like
light, electrons have a dual nature and can exist as both particles and waves (that can be
described by wave functions). In fact as Louis deBroglie discovered, all mass exhibits wave
properties. Another property of electrons is that there is fundamental limitation on how
exactly one can know both the position and the momentum of the electron at a given time.
This means that the more precisely one knows the momentum of an electron, the less one
334
knows about the position of that at a certain point in time and vice versa. This is known as
the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. This principle applies to all matter but it only has a
significant effect on particles as small as electrons."
>>
>> "According to the Heisenberg uncertainty Principle, an electron on one side of the
Josephson Junction has a finite probability of existing on the other side of the barrier.
Another way to think about it is that the wavefunction of the electron can not stop
immediately at the insulating barrier; it must die out over some distance. If the wavefunction
is not completely dead by the time it reaches the other side of the insulating barrier, it can
keep going on its merry way."
>> http://www.uni.uiuc.edu/~hchiang/chem/jj.html
>> At 09:36 PM 1/31/02 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>> Larry,
>>>
>>> Thanks. It is worthwhile to understand the system.
>>>
>>> Bob
S-194. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a past letter sent to Carl Sagan
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
Date : Sat, 02 Feb 2002 12:44:26 -0800
> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 12:43:27 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>
> Lesley:
>
> One last letter to explain why I originally contacted Ann aside from encouragement from my
business associates. I want to explain why I wrote Carl Sagan in the first place which is somewhat
of a personal nature.
>
> It has to do with Carl being on site at Selfridge AFB in 1966-67. As it turns out, my former
supervisor Ray Nyls was the Base Commander (Major Raymond Nyls) when J. Allan Hyneck and
Carl Sagan were stationed there to work on "Project Bluebook". Ray was the "Second in Command"
-- directly under Hyneck working on Project Bluebook.
>
> I had worked for several years with Ray and even commuted to work with him and he never, ever
mentioned his work on Project Bluebook. Ray was also a friend and confidante. That was a main
decision for me to join the U.S. Navy Flight School in late 1981. It wasn't until I was confronted by
the flying space vehicles on 2 occasions (Oct. 18, 1981 and Dec. 22, 1981 -- at one point from 10
335
feet away!). The entire town of Eugene was also buzzed by these same craft including members of
the Eugene police force. The Eugene Police encouraged me to make a report on their behalf with the
FBI, which I did. Since then, we formed UNITEL, Inc. and have been developing our version of
what we saw back then.
>
> However, in 1984 a lady friend gave me a UFO paperback book that listed my former boss and
retired fighter pilot Ray Nyls as being an active part in 'Project Bluebook' along with Carl Sagan and
J. Hyneck. I was shocked at this and immediately took the book to Ray's home to confront him
about the situation. Ray's wife Marge became hysterical, saying to me she didn't want her husband
Ray to get involved in that stuff again.
>
> Ray confirmed that it was true and I gave him the paperback novel. I asked him what he thought
of Project Bluebook (which was disbanded shortly after his stay at Selfridge AFB). He answered
that the witnesses "were just a bunch of people waving their hands to get on camera". I then began
asking him if there was something he wanted to say concerning my sightings (while I was with
several other witnesses) that had something definitely to do with me. I know Ray very well after
working with him for so many years on complicated engineering projects. He knew better than to lie
because I could tell if he was going to lie to me. So he basically said "I'm not talking, Larry" and I
dropped it.
>
> I know that I could not have pried any info concerning the events as it was obvious it was a State
Secret or USAF secret that he was obligated not to talk about. These guys don't even talk to their
wives about it. So I didn't even try. I haven't talked to Ray much since. I feel used like the USAF
knows something that I don't. To this day, we have much support from the USAF. But they never
seem to have the funds to fund the construction of our prototypes.
>
> Anyway, the letter that I received from Carl (that I sent in my last email for Ann to read) was an
answer to my letter that I sent him asking if he had anything he wanted to comment on concerning
his stay at Selfridge AFB and my sightings and/or our patented proposed space propulsion system. I
at first thought that I was getting the tight lip service again when I read Carl's letter. But I didn't
realize that he was ill and died shortly after writing the letter. I did wonder about why Carl didn't
simply ignore my letter. But he did respond.
>
> I know that our work is what Carl had spent his whole life on in hope that someone like us would
create a real spaceship someday. It is sad that he can't be alive to see our progress. I wonder if Ann
remembers what went on back in those days? They say that 'Project Bluebook' was disbanded to
keep secret the real stuff going on that has much to do with me.
>
> A new edition to the book was put out within one month after I told him about the book with Ray's
name removed. We are publishing an autobiography of our project that includes the sightings, FBI
and police reports entitled Flying Colors. I am not going to mention Ray (or Carl's) name
concerning the whole UFO book and my event out of respect for Ray. We are also negotiating for
funding to produce a film on MQT and aerospace propulsion entitled "Tunnel Time". I am sure if
Carl were alive today, he would be intrigued and impressed with the content and esteemed
researchers on the film.
>
>Anyway, that is why I contacted Carl and why he wrote back. I thought Ann would like to know
that. Thanks,
>
> Larry Maurer
> Unitel, Inc.
336
>> Larry,
>> Will do.
>> Lesley
>> --------->>> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:01:10 -0700
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>>>
>>> Dear Lesley:
>>>
>>> Could you please also forward the attached jpg of a letter I received from Carl Sagan to
Ann. I think she would appreciate seeing it. Thanks,
>>>
>>> Larry Maurer
>>> Unitel, Inc.
>>>
>>> At 02:18 PM 1/29/02 -0800, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> Larry,
>>>> I'm sorry I didn't respond directly to your previous email. I did forward >it on to
Ann Druyan's office in New York, and hopefully they will get back >to you from there.
>>>>
>>>> Very best,
>>>> Lesley Taplin
>>>> Cosmos Studios
>>>>
>>>> on 1/29/02 1:45 PM, Larry Maurer (by way of Cosmos) at [email protected]
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Attention: Please forward to Ann Druyan
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:21:59 -0800
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
>>>>>Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>>>>>
>>>>>Dear Ann:
>>>>>
>>>>>I thought you may be interested in our exciting projects here at UNITEL so I
took the liberty of attaching our latest newsletter. I had communicated with Carl
shortly before he passed away and I have a letter from him. I am sure that he would
be really enthused with the success and progress we have made. We are ready to start
construction and testing of our prototypes at UIC in Chicago. Our VP -- Doug
Starfield -- told me that you may be interested in our project after the failure of the
space sail project, etc. We are finishing our autobiography book entitled Flying
Colors and we are discussing production of several films to be aired for public
viewing (TV and films). One individual we are contacting is Mrs. Gene
Roddenberry. Please let me know if you are interested in our projects and I will be
happy to send you information on our plans, projects, etc. Thank you,
337
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal&Director, Engineering
>>>>> Unitel, Inc.
>>>>> (503) 232-2740
>>>>> www.unitelnw.com
S-195. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding future discussions with Dr. Michio Kaku
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: future discussions with Dr. Kaku
Date : Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:03:32 -0800
> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:01:33 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Note - the universe is about 15 billion years old …
>
> Bob:
>
> I would like to. But since Kaku has ignored any of the last 4 attempts to communicate with him, I
seriously doubt he would. I think it is too late. He has pretty much taken a firm stance and now has
to stand by it (meaning he does not believe in ANY of the UFO stories and FTL or MQT
applications). I think we can do better with Ed Witten, Dr. Ray Chiao, and so on. They have a
chance to defend their views in a positive mode.
>
> I can almost bet you, Bob, that Kaku will strive to either ignore or run away from any further
confrontations on WKB or MQT debate. There are too many big guns in the IAA-IAF along with
NASA BPP (Dr. Chiao) researchers pointing the way that MQT is truly feasible and the way to go.
This is a sad situation. But I know these types like Kaku and Thorne who are glory hogs and have
killed their goats. Now it's time for them to just fade away like old soldiers of an ancient outdated
science.
>
> I can't wait for our movie and book for the Public to decide what we should do. It isn't going to
take a whole lot of money to construct and test our prototypes. The Oil boys will seriously be
confronted with their death grip of mis-information will be extinguished in the name of progress by
the viewing public. This will hopefully lead the way.
>
> I would seriously like Kaku to talk to the Eugene Police officers on duty those nights. I will tell
you that they DO NOT like some government investigator telling them they were seeing something
other than what they saw. I will never remember that mutual look of "I know how you feel" from
the police. Believe me, they are serious and that is why they asked me to report the incidences to
the FBI. We know what we saw and -- more precisely -- what we were shown. That is the QCD
Strong Force connection that we are about to prove (among other things).
>
> I know this is hard for you to choke down, Bob. But think how I feel. I have a career in the
engineering field and I certainly don't run around telling everyone that I saw a UFO. The fact is,
338
however, when it boils down to the truth, no matter how hard it is to take we have to deal with it. I
want to show all sighting incidences exactly as they happened. Police reports and everything.
>
> There is no mistaking the evidence when we saw the craft from 10 feet away. Further more, we
have had 20 years to perfect our understanding of what we were shown and we are truly ready to
build! Michael has proven his knowledge of Physics many times and it will be interesting for us to
just tell the whole World the physics behind what we saw and what we intend to build. Perhaps we
can get to Kaku through a third party. But like I say, I seriously think he will conveniently duck the
issue and decline any discussion.
>
> Regards,
>
> Larry
>
>At 12:50 PM 2/2/02 -0800, you wrote:
>
>> Larry,
>>
>> I have not emailed Dr. Kaku after interchanging several emails about the WKB Approx.
about two to three years ago.
>>
>>I understand what you are stating further below.
>>
>> One possible way to initialize a debate is to bring up the topic on Kaku's message board. He
has some fairly knowledgeable people who run the board for him.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> Larry Maurer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello Bob:
>>>
>>> I sincerely hope Dr. Kaku can sit down and listen to what we have to say. I just can't sit
there and listen to him say "we will never have the ability to travel with MQT techniques, not
in a thousand years" after what I have been through in my life. I was an agnostic to until I
personally was confronted by a working craft along with half the town of Eugene. I have the
entire Eugene Police force and the FBI supporting these sightings. We can prove why they
weren't picked up on radar as we can reflect RF waves from our ships. They showed us
something (red, green, & blue lens) that is the key to MQT and using QCD (Color or Strong
Force) for space travel and quantum computers. My co-inventor and business partner along
with our associates. We want to debate WKB Approx and other points openly on TV if
necessary for the benefit of Mankind. Strange but it is the TRUTH! and we aim to prove
ourselves once and for all!
>>>
>>>Larry
>>>
>>>At 09:49 PM 2/1/02 -0800, you wrote:
>>>
339
>>>> Larry,
>>>
>>>> Kaku is an OK guy who outwardly defends the "norms".
>>>>
>>>> It is important to listen very closely. I want your plan to work.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Bob
S-196. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding postings of breakthroughs at the Los Alamos
website
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
Date : Fri, 08 Feb 2002 15:06:15 -0800
> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 14:49:47 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>
> Dears Sirs: , I am making contact with your group. We have the targeted manufacturers of the
various components of our proposed patented all-electric propulsion system. The vehicle will
hopefully perform as we expect -- much like a helicopter in that it will hover or move about in any
direction from slow to very high rates of velocity in a completely computer-controlled system.
>
> The craft, however, in its variable size from a sportscar size to the Zeppelin size, cigar-shaped
vehicles cannot rest on solid surfaces as they will have to be suspended by a Mag-Lev type of
suspension. This is because of the exterior charge at the hull surface. The close-adhering EM
charge on the exterior Titanium-Niobium smartskin hull can be modulated to produce extremely fine
interactions such as becoming radar-invisible stealth capability by absorbing or bending around the
craft any RF wave including RADAR. The exterior charge is a 1/3 fractional charge in a modulated
Raleigh wave integrity that will provide the force of sufficient electrical potential. A plasma (cloud
of ionized gases) will be formed.
>
> As described by early researchers: "In the Searle case, it was believed that 'free electrons' were
centrifugally thrown towards the outside rim to accumulate the necessary potential for the lift. The
mention of the Klystron in previous similar designs is again interesting in that it provides a clue to a
superior means of creating the plasma levitation field locally. Klystrons and magnetrons are used in
microwave ovens to generate the intense, focused local microwave field for cooking. This indicates
that application to an appropriate surface at a specific frequency might excite the surrounding air
sufficiently to generate the plasma."
>
> I hope to hear from your group if you are interested in our proposed projects. Thank you,
>
> Larry D. Maurer
> Principal & Director, Engineering
> Unitel, Inc.
340
> (503) 232-2740
> www.unitelnw.com
>>
>> From: "frank chille" <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: A Possible Helpful Link
>> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 20:14:13
>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2002 20:14:17.0950 (UTC)
>> FILETIME=[2FCFE7E0:01C1B0DD]
>> X-RCPT-TO: <[email protected]>
>>
>> Hi Larry & Bill
>>
>> Larry, thanks much for your earlier email. I pass this note onto both of you. Bill knows Art;
but for your info, Larry - Art Wagner is a Theoretical Physicist who keeps his hand in breaking
technology - he has spend much time at the Princeton Physics Library keeping abreast many
diverse elements which are coming to Light in anti-gravity, propulsion, string theory, quantum,
etc. He felt both you and Bill should be aware of this link - please give our best to Mike. Until
sooner,
>>
Frank Chille
>>
>> PS Art has found some most amazing physics breakthroughs listed on the Los Alamos
website - would you like him to share them with you and Mike?
>>
>>> From: "art wagner" <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:37:20 -0500
>>>
>>>.Hi Frank - "A Causally Connected Superluminal Warp drive Spacetime" by F. Loup, R.
Held, D. Waite, E. Halerewicz, Jr., M. Stabno, M. Kuntzman and R. Sims (January 28, 2002)
posted to (xxx.lanl.gov) at arXiv:gr-qc/0202021 6Feb2002. Relay to Bill and Larry...advise
that they make contact with Advanced Theoretical propulsion Group (ATPG) headed by the
above-mentioned people at http://www.geocities.com/halgravity/atpg.html ). Art
S-197. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing UNITEL's book
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Re: chapter 5
Date : Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:14:57 -0800
> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:49:32 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: chapter 5
>
> Thanks, Paul!
341
> I got it okay. I'll answer the questions in red and fire the changed version right back to you.
Concerning the "Type III" question, remember I have scanned and burned the drawings of each Type
(I thru VI) so the Drawing of III & IV is inserted there for the reader. I will make a brief comment
on the differences between each type as they are mentioned.
>
> We are contacting Morris Publishing:
>
>> Morris Publishing
1-800-650-7888
>> 3212 East Higway 30
>> POBox 2110
>> Kearney,NE 68847
>> http://[email protected]/
>>
>> Gary Dean said they are doing his book "Bridge Across the Universe" and that they will do
1000 hardback high quality books for $3000 with 20 color photos. Gary also said they do some
marketing and will do the first 1000 after enough advanced orders come in. We could sell them
for $49.95 to $59.95 and give you part of the sales profit and use the rest for Unitel's projects.
What do you think?
>>
>> Anyway, I want to get the other chapters and pertinent materials including the final edited
version of the Interdimensional Journal on the CD ROM and mail it to you so you will have
everything. If we could coordinate with Morris and/or another publisher, we could get the ship
under way as they say! Comments?
>>
>> Larry
>>
>> At 12:04 AM 2/10/02 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I went through chapter 5. It took about 3 hours. There are a couple of things that will
need further elaboration and I have marked these in red text.
>>>
>>> I have sometimes added things which evolved out of conversations you and I have had
in earlier e-mails. However, I hope you are checking my edit to make sure I have things right.
In general, I have been trying to let your voice shine through in the edit, and have just
removed redundant statements or changed things that read awkwardly.
>>>
>>> For this to be book length, it will have to be around 110 pages at least. It seems with
this chapter you may be at around 20-to-25 pages. So I hope you are working on the latter
chapters so that we can pull this together. I have no doubt that you have much more to say
and that expanding this to 110 pages will not be a problem. If however you want suggestions
let me know. For instance, you could start discussing some of the problems you've had with
venture capitalists who want to see it done before they invest. You could also explain the
physics more.
>>> best, Paul
S-198. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing specifics on UNITEL's book
342
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Re: slight adjustments and ideas
Date : Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:15:30 -0800
> At 08:53 PM 2/10/02 -0800, you wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I have been thinking that I want to do the highest good. So in regards to Chapter 5 that I just
sent, I am sending a politically correct revision.
>>
>> Basically, you mention the Cadmium in the school and the Cadmium in the design of the skin
and how the simultaneity of the event seemed a positive sign. The fact is that Cadmium is toxic
and so I have added a word about how you will have to work with it carefully.
>>
>> Also you mention how you lost Dr. Hwa when you went told him you went to the DoD. This
gives us the opportunity to mention that inventors don't get much support from the Government
and that the reader can contact their representative to lobby for money for inventors.
>>
>> Also, I think how this effects me in the present is that it will be important to ask for NSF
funding rather than defense dept. money. And as I have mentioned before, I think the way to go
there is to get a STTR grant for industry-academia partnership. What I visualize is that a local
community college could build the tear-drop shell. Perhaps I am incredibly naive here but I am
wondering if indeed the basic frame of the ship could actually be built by students. I can bet that
those students would come to that class on time and it would be good publicity both for the
school and your company. You could get newspaper headings like: "corporation in Oregon
participates in cutting edge science with minority community college." The local college has
airplanes in their back yard that the students learn to repair. With funding, could they do
something more ambitious? I would suppose you get experts to check for QC.
>>
>> Anyway for the complicated stuff like the skin, a place like UCLA could lay the coating and
insert the switch that turns on the plasma stuff and the laser projection pinwheel with the taught
nippy at the end (however that is done). So here your plans could be brought into reality by
coordinating with 2 academic institutions. And then you have the angle that big fat UCLA is
working with poor West LA College. Now you have mentioned that there are other commercial
companies that could help with the production and they could be pulled in to the industryacademic grant as well. If this resonates with you, perhaps we could do a sketch of the proposal.
>>
>> best, Paul
> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:12:42 -0800
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: slight adjustments and ideas
>
> Sounds good, Paul!
>
> I think that we need to drop our bombshell on the Public with marketing our book while we are
deciding which path is best. If we could be the captains of our own ship with UNITEL. At any rate,
I like getting the universities directly involved. The CdS is in the lens -- not the hull skin (Nb-Ti).
We already have several universities involved. So why not bring in the feds with matching funds?
343
The USAF is still hanging in there with us. They actually have some groovy people that are trying
everything they can to help us. They are just strapped by limited funds by the Fed. A public
reaction as a response to our book may instigate all of this!
>
> As far as the attached chapter are you saying, you want it to over ride the last version you sent?
>
> Regards,
>
> Larry
>
S-199. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing specifics on UNITEL's book
From : Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
Date : Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:06:24 -0800
Attachment : CWINDOWSTEMPnsmail621.jpe (114k)
Mark : FYI
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:12:25 -0800
>.From: P2 Systems <[email protected]>
> Organization: P2 Systems
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en,x-ns1BB83msitNh5,x-ns2U100btwUq5f
> To: Larry Maurer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
> X-RCPT-TO: <[email protected]>
>
> Larry,
>
> Here is Siamak's new business. I stand corrected regarding what I said previously. He appears to
have an interest in the Holo Propulsion System.
>
> DugOut
344
<= previous E-mails 100-149
next E-mails 200-249 =>
if on the Internet, press <BACK> on your browser to return to
the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)
else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE> this
file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'
345