Download pdf - UMD Physics

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Coherent states wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Propagator wikipedia , lookup

Second quantization wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Coupled cluster wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Tight binding wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Wave function wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PHYS420 (Spring 2002)
Riq Parra
Homework # 11
(due Monday, May 6th, 2002)
Problems
1.
Show, for the infinite well, that the average position < x > is independent of the
quantum state.
2 nπ
Hint: Use the integral formula:
∫ u cos u du = 0
(for integer n)
0
Answer: The way to solve this problem is by direct mathematical computation of
the average position for the particle in the infinite well.
∞
< x >= ∫ψ n* ( x) xψ n ( x) dx
−∞
2
 nπx 
sin 

L  L 
We do the integral making use of the trig identity, 2 sin 2 θ = 1 − cos 2θ . Note that
since the wave function is zero outside the box, we can replace the limits of
integration with [0,L].
L
L
2
1
 2nπx 
2  nπ x 
< x >= ∫ x sin 
dx = ∫ x − x cos
 dx
L0
L0
 L 
 L 
Where ψ n ( x) =
1 1
< x >=  x 2
L  2
L
0
 2nπx  
− ∫ x cos
 dx 
 L  
0
L
2nπx
and changing the limits of integration…
L
2 nπ
L
L
< x >= − 2 2 ∫ u cos u du
2 4n π 0
L
< x >=
2
We find that this result is independent of the quantum state.
Making the substitution, u ≡
2.
Carefully sketch the wave function and the probability density for the n = 4 state
of a particle in a finite potential well.
Answer: Since the potential is symmetric, the 4th bound state wave function must
have 3 nodes and display an odd symmetry about the midpoint of the well. Since
the potential is constant inside the well, the wavelength and the amplitude of the
sinusoidal curve are also constant.
3.
SMM, Chapter 5, problem 26.
Hint: Check Example 5.13 if you are stuck.
Answer: At its limits of vibration x = ± A , the classical oscillator has all its
1
energy in potential form: E = mω 2 A 2 . If the energy is quantized according to
2
1
E n = (n + )hω , then the corresponding amplitudes are
2
(2n + 1)h
An =
mω
4.
Calculate < x > , < x 2 > , and ∆x for a quantum oscillator in its ground state.
Hint 1: Is the integral, over all x, of an odd function zero?
Hint 2: Use the integral formula
∞
1 π
2 − au 2
∫0 u e du = 4a a a > 0
∞
Answer: For this problem we want to compute < x >= ∫ψ n* ( x) xψ n ( x) dx and
−∞
∞
< x 2 >= ∫ψ n* ( x) x 2 ψ n ( x) dx , for the quantum oscillator ground state (i.e.
−∞
1/ 4
 mω 
−
x
 mω 
2h
ψ 0 ( x) = 
 e   ). It is important to note that the ground state wave
 hπ 
function is a Gaussian, which has an even symmetry around the origin. [Ground
state functions of symmetric potentials share this property].
And so…
2
 mω 
∞
−
x
mω
 h 
xe
dx = 0
hπ −∫∞
Since the integrand is made up of the multiplication of an even function
(Gaussian) and an odd function (x), the resulting function is therefore odd. When
we integrate such a function over all of x, the integral over the negative half-axis
(x<0) exactly cancels that over the positive half-axis (x>0). Easy enough!
< x >=
2
For the calculation of < x 2 > , however, the integrand is even and the two halfaxes contribute equally, giving
< x >=
2
∞
 mω  2
x
h 
−
mω
2

x
e
hπ −∫∞
< x 2 >= 2
And so
∞
mω h
hπ 4mω
dx
hπ
h
=
mω 2mω
∆x = < x 2 > − < x > 2 =
5.
 mω  2
x
h 
mω 2 −
dx = 2
x e
hπ ∫0
h
2mω
SMM, Chapter 6, problem 1.
Answer: (a) The reflection coefficient is the ratio of the reflected to the incident
wave intensity, or
2
1
(1 − i )
(1 − i )(1 + i ) = 1
2
R=
=
2
(1 + i )(1 − i )
1
(1 + i )
2
(b) To the left of the step, the wave function corresponds to a free particle and
2mE
. On the other hand, to the right of the step, wave function is a
thus k =
h2
2m(U − E )
. Setting these two equations equal
decaying exponential where k =
h2
to each other
2mE
2m(U − E )
=
2
h
h2
E =U − E
E 1
=
U 2
1
h
=
. Letting E = 10 MeV,
k
2mE
MeV
nm ⋅ eV
m proton = 938.3 2 and using h = 197.3
(which comes from the fact that
c
c
hc = 1239.7 nm ⋅ eV ).
197.3 nm ⋅ eV
c
δ =
= 1.44 x10 −6 nm = 1.44 fm
6
2
6
2(938.3 x10 eV / c )(10 x10 eV )
(c) The penetration depth is given by δ =
6.
Sketch careful, qualitatively accurate plots for the stated wave functions in each
of the potentials shown. Check that your wave function has the correct symmetry,
number of nodes, relative wavelengths, maximum values of amplitudes and
relative rate of decrease outside the well.
(a) The ground state, 1st and 2nd excited wave functions of the quantum oscillator.
Realize that this corresponds to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd bound state.
(b) The 5th bound state of the finite square well with a two level floor.
(c) The 5th bound state of the finite square well with a ramped floor.