Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
INDUSTRY IN FIGURES 31 SECTION 4 industry in figures Australian production Source: Queensland sugar mills, NSW Sugar Milling Cooperative, CJ Ord River Sugar Mill ABOVE: 2008–09 saw the continuation of a declining trend in cane production in most districts as growers responded to several years of poor prices and high input costs. BELOW: A reduction in planted area in Queensland and the negative impact of frosts and flooding in NSW all contributed to a five per cent fall in sugar production compared to 2007–08. Source: Queensland sugar mills, NSW Sugar Milling Cooperative, CJ Ord River Sugar Mill 32 — AUSTRALIAN SUGARCANE ANNUAL 2009 SECTION 4 industry in figures Source: Queensland sugar mills, NSW Sugar Milling Cooperative, CJ Ord River Sugar Mill ABOVE: High input costs, low prices on offer at planting and competition from alternative crop opportunities saw the sugarcane area fall to just over 370,000 hectares. This is a level not seen since 1995. BELOW: The average cane yield was back by two per cent on the 2007–08 figure of 88 tonnes per hectare but a general improvement in CCS levels across most districts saw a three per cent improvement in sugar yield per hectare. Source: Queensland sugar mills, NSW Sugar Milling Cooperative, CJ Ord River Sugar Mill AUSTRALIAN SUGARCANE ANNUAL 2009 — 33 SECTION 4 industry in figures World production Source: **ABARE projection and FAOSTAT ABOVE: The actual area planted to sugarcane is an increasingly shadowy figure as farmers move in and out of cane quickly in search of higher returns from competing crops. It’s estimated that the 2008–09 cane area fell by around five per cent on the previous year. An eight per cent fall in sugar production reflected the reduced area and the increased diversion into ethanol production in Brazil. With consumption steadily increasing and reduced production closing stocks fell. BELOW: Brazil remains the standout producer and this was made even more apparent in 2008–09 with the significantly reduced tonnage from India. Source: ABARE/FAO/USDA/FAS PSD 34 — AUSTRALIAN SUGARCANE ANNUAL 2009 SECTION 4 industry in figures Source: * ABARE estimate and **ABARE forecast LEFT: This is a happy graph for Australian growers – average return for cane in 2009–10 is forecast to be around $43 a tonne, compared with $31 a tonne in 2008–09 and $26 a tonne in 2007–08. The international scene LEFT: Again the sorts of figures the entire industry likes to see – favourable world sugar prices mean favourable returns and the projections are for a reduced rate of increase into 2009–10 but an increase none the less. ABOVE LEFT: Korea remains Australia’s largest sugar customer accounting for 30 per cent of total exports of some 3.4 million tonnes. AUSTRALIAN SUGARCANE ANNUAL 2009 — 35 Source: ABARE SECTION 4 industry in figures NOTE: Includes exports of both raw and white sugar measured in raw sugar equivalents. Source: USDA/FAS PSD ABOVE: Brazil remains the world sugar powerhouse. In a year when there was a significant increase in the percentage of the crop committed to ethanol production, Brazil still managed sugar exports of around 20 million tonnes. BELOW: Demand around the world remained strong despite the global financial meltdown. Sugar remains an affordable and desirable part of the diet of most cultures. Source: ABARE/USDA/FAS PSD 36 — AUSTRALIAN SUGARCANE ANNUAL 2009