* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Ginzburg-Landau theory Free energy Ginzburg
Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup
Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Ising model wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Ginzburg-Landau theory Ginzburg-Landau equations • • • • • • • • • BCS: microscopic, very powerful – but too complicated Order parameter Free energy Ginzburg-Landau equations Critical field of a film Type-II superconductors Upper critical field Lower critical field Vortex structure Vortex motion. Pinning London equations: describe a very special situation Applicability range: close to the transition temperature. No restrictions concerning the nature of (conventional) superconductors. Idea: order parameter is a complex number – wave function of Cooper pairs. Ψ(r ) Free energy – functional of the order parameter. Ginzburg-Landau equations τ = (T − Tc ) / Tc 2e ⎞ H ⎪⎫ ⎛ ⎬ ⎜ −i ∇ − A ⎟ Ψ + c ⎠ 8π ⎪⎭ ⎝ 2 2 Minimizing the free energy: 2 ⎧⎪ b 4 1 ⎛ 2e ⎞ H 2 ⎫⎪ 2 Fs = Fn + ∫ dV ⎨aτ Ψ + Ψ + ⎬ ⎜ −i ∇ − A ⎟ Ψ + 2 4 m c 8π ⎭⎪ ⎝ ⎠ ⎪⎩ With respect to Expansion at the critical point Energy of the normal state Without fluctuations: ⎧−aτ / b T < Tc 2 Ψ0 = ⎨ T > Tc ⎩ 0 δ Way out: to develop a theory based on Landau theory of second order phase transitions. Free energy b 4 1 2 ⎪⎧ Fs = Fn + ∫ dV ⎨aτ Ψ + Ψ + 2 4m ⎪⎩ ξ Ψ* 2 Energy of magnetic field Fluctuation contribution (“kinetic energy of Cooper pairs”) aτΨ + b Ψ Ψ + 2 Boundary condition: Ginzburg-Landau equations Minimizing the free energy: ⎧⎪ b 4 1 ⎛ 2e ⎞ H 2 ⎫⎪ 2 Fs = Fn + ∫ dV ⎨aτ Ψ + Ψ + ⎬ ⎜ −i ∇ − A ⎟ Ψ + m c 2 4 8π ⎪⎭ ⎝ ⎠ ⎩⎪ 1 ⎛ 2e ⎞ ⎜ −i ∇ − A ⎟ Ψ = 0 4m ⎝ c ⎠ 2e ⎞ ⎛ n ⎜ −i ∇ − A ⎟ Ψ = 0 c ⎠ ⎝ Rescaling GL equations Ψ → Ψ / Ψ 0 , r → r / δ , H → H / H 0 , H 0 = 2 2π aτ b3/ 2 2 With respect to ∇× H = 4π j c The rescaled equations contain only one constant! κ = 2eH 0δ 2 / c (−iκ −1∇ − A)2 Ψ − Ψ + Ψ Ψ = 0 2 A j =− “Maxwell equation” ( ) ie 2e2 2 Ψ*∇Ψ − Ψ∇Ψ* − Ψ A mc 2m ( ) n −iκ −1∇ − A Ψ = 0 at the surface ∇×∇× A = − ( ) i 2 Ψ*∇Ψ − Ψ∇Ψ* − Ψ A 2κ 1 Critical field of a film Steps of the calculation: - Write the energy difference between S and N phases; - Find at which field the energies are the same (depends on - Solve GL equations and find the order parameter; - Find the critical field Results: Thick films, Thin films δ d H c = H cb (1 + δ / d ) δ d Critical field of a film Let us now look at the details. Ψ) H cb = H 0 / 2 H c = 2 6 H cbδ / d Hc Thick films d κ 1 give Ψ ≈ const δ Ψ 2 ≈ 1 First-order phase transition Thin films d δ GL equations for Fs − Fn Ψ=0 Second-order phase transition At certain thickness the transition order changes d Fs − Fn δ d δ dc = 5δ H H cb H cb Ψ δ /d Critical field of a film Type-I superconductors: 1st order phase transition in the bulk is realized by splitting into N and S layers Type II superconductors: does not work! Interface energy: negative Ψ 2 Phase transition must be of the second order and occurs in the interval of fields Optimal thickness of a layer Intermediate state! H cb 2 Type-II superconductors H > Hc2 Interface energy: positive Critical field of one layer is higher H H < H c1 (Upper critical field) Even a small piece of superconductor is unstable Normal metal (Lower critical field) Fully developed Meissner effect Superconductor H c1 < H < H c 2 Mixed state No Meissner effect Formation of infinitely thin layers is preferable First-order phase transition is shifted to infinitely strong fields! Upper critical field Two possible mechanisms: - Spins of two electrons in a Cooper pair become parallel – too strong fields - Larmor radius of a Cooper pair becomes shorter than ξ Larmor radius: p⊥ rL = cp⊥ c < eH eH ξ Lower critical field What happens below Persistent currents (no decay): vortices! Quantum vortices: -component of momentum of the pair transverse to the magnetic field ξ < rL ⇒ H < H c 2 ∼ c eξ 2 Hc 2 ? Magnetic field penetrates the superconductor H v Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization: ρ 2π n = ∫ pdq = 2m ∫ vdl = 2mv ⋅ 2πρ H c 2 = κ H cb > H cb v = n / 2mρ - quantized velocity n=1: energetically the most favorable ξ ρ δ 2 Lower critical field v = n / 2mρ ξ Vortex energy (per unit length): E= δ ρ δ H ns πn δ πn 2mvs2 ⋅ 2πρ d ρ = s ln = s ln κ 2 ∫ξ 4m ξ 4m 2 Isolated vortex 2 What is the magnetic flux in a vortex? Ψ v Vortex magnerization (per unit length): ns 2e πn e ρ vs ⋅ 2πρ d ρ = s δ 2 2 c ∫ξ 2mc H Lower critical field: the first vortex is formed H ξ δ Ψ = Ψeiθ Magnetic energy: -MH δ M= Vortex core ρ Current: ρ j =− ) 2e2 ⎞ 2⎛e j = Ψ ⎜ ∇θ − A⎟ mc ⎠ ⎝m Far from the vortex core: no current Let us integrate over a contour around the vortex center. H cb H c1 = E / M = (c / eδ 2 ) ln κ ∼ H cb ln κ / κ 2 < H cb 1/ 2 κ ∫ ∇θ dl = 2e c ∫ Adl = Vortex lattice 2eΦ c Φ = nΦ s , Φ s ≡ π c / e Form a triangular vortex lattice -superconducting flux quantum Vortex motion Close to lower critical field – sparse vortices I If current is passed through a superconductor in a mixed state: Lorentz force acts at the core electrons a Lattice period: determined by H a ( ie 2e2 2 Ψ*∇Ψ − Ψ∇Ψ* − Ψ A 2m mc F ∝ j×H Per plaquette: half a vortex Vortex motion transverse to the current Φs 3 2 aH = 2 4 Total flux per plaquette: Hc 2 : vortices overlap Motion of magnetic flux with a constant velocity Electric field a ∼ ξ ⇒ Hc 2 ∼ Φs / ξ 2 H c1 ∼ Φ s / δ ; H cb ∼ Φ s / δξ 2 Resistance!! 1 E = H ×v c ρ ∼ ρN H / Hc2 Like if produced by vortex cores. Pinning Does it mean Type-II superconductors have resistance down to very low fields? No, vortices do not move (at weak currents) Pinning: Is more favorable than It costs energy to depin a vortex. 3