* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chemical Protection: In and Out of the Lab
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Chemical Protection: In and Out of the Lab You’ve suited up for a day in the lab. Lab coat? Check. Safety glasses? Check. Gloves? Check. Hazmat suit? Ummmm….hazmat suit? That’s right. Chemicals such as acids, bases, solvents and more are common in labs and other controlled environments. And even if you don’t directly handle dangerous chemicals in your lab, chances are good that dangerous chemicals are present somewhere in your facility or on your campus. That’s why it’s important to include personal protective equipment (PPE) that provides chemical protection in your overall PPE program. Chemical protection apparel is designed specifically to block harmful chemicals from reaching the skin. From chemical resistant gloves and simple sleeve protectors to safety goggles and fully encapsulated hazmat suits, there is a variety of PPE that provides chemical protection for workers in labs. Risk Assessment and Hazard Analysis The first step in selecting the appropriate chemical protection PPE is a thorough analysis of the hazards in the environment – both within and outside the lab. In addition to the lab, consider other areas of the facility, such as shipping/receiving and production environments. The goal in a hazard analysis is to identify all the possible ways someone could be hurt while working. Once hazards are identified, the next step is to attempt to remove the hazards or minimize their potential via engineering or process changes. When such changes aren’t possible, it’s time to turn to PPE to protect workers. However, before that is done, the other key step is a risk assessment. Here, it is important to understand how likely the hazard is to occur and what the consequences are if the exposure does happen. Consider this example: A trained laboratory technician is working with sulfuric acid in a lab, using 10ml of chemical at a time to create a dilute acid solution to be used in a different experiment later in the day. In this case, while the technician is working with acid, the quantity is small and only the tech’s hands and forearms are entering the area of potential exposure. A safety professional assessing this hazard may decide that even though a splash is possible, the tech’s whole body is not exposed and the volume of chemical is minimal. A recommendation for chemical resistant gloves and sleeve protectors may provide reasonable protection. The safety professional might even conservatively recommend a chemical apron but not require a full coverall in this particular application. In fact, two different lab safety professionals may make different recommendations on the same chemical and task based on their knowledge of other lab conditions that could affect safety. 1 Penetration Data vs. Permeation Data Understanding chemical resistance data of PPE is important in the PPE selection process. Remember to look at both permeation and penetration data. Chemical penetration data is determined via a test method (ASTM F903) intended to measure the resistance of the material to liquid chemicals. The use of penetration data is appropriate when the chemical does not present a gas or vapor hazard and only liquid splash protection is required. The test requires the chemical to be held against the material (at saturation) for 60 minutes. If, at the end of the 60 minute period, the liquid has not come through the material, then the material “passes” the test. If anything comes through, even one tiny droplet, then the material “fails” the test. Often, penetration results are much easier to understand than permeation data. Permeation data, on the other hand, tells how molecules of the chemical come through the material. Molecule permeation is more like exposure to a gas or vapor. It does not indicate whether a liquid splash will come through the material or not. Selection based on permeation data alone will often drive lab purchasers to choose a garment that is more expensive and less comfortable than what they would choose if they considered liquid penetration data. The Bottom Line Use practical observations of the tasks being performed when thinking about the use of PPE. While both chemical penetration and chemical permeation data are crucial, the best choice for chemical protection PPE can not be made based only on what chemical is being used. 2