* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Arrhythmia Surgery in Patients With and Without Congenital Heart
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Cardiothoracic surgery wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Mitral insufficiency wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Lutembacher's syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Atrial septal defect wikipedia , lookup
Atrial fibrillation wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Heart arrhythmia wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
ORIGINAL ARTICLES: PEDIATRIC CARDIAC PEDIATRIC CARDIAC SURGERY: Arrhythmia Surgery in Patients With and Without Congenital Heart Disease Constantine Mavroudis, MD, Barbara J. Deal, MD, Carl L. Backer, MD, and Sabrina Tsao, MD Divisions of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery and Cardiology, Children’s Memorial Hospital, and the Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois Background. Arrhythmia surgery has favorably impacted the clinical course of debilitating atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without congenital heart disease. This study reviews arrhythmia mechanisms and documents long-term outcome of patients undergoing arrhythmia operations alone or associated with congenital heart repairs. The analysis excludes Fontan conversion patients. Methods. Between 1987 and 2007, arrhythmia operations were done in 11 patients without associated congenital heart disease and in 89 along with congenital heart repairs. Mean age was 15.9 ⴞ 12.5 years (range, 7 days– 48 years); 7 were infants (mean age, 23 ⴞ 16 days). Resternotomy was performed in 65 (65%). Two functional ventricles were present in 67 patients; 33 had 1 functional ventricle. Arrhythmias included macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia in 45, atrial fibrillation in 11, accessory connections in 19, atrioventricular nodal reen- try tachycardia in 6, focal atrial tachycardia in 6, and ventricular tachycardia in 13. Results. Operative mortality was 3 (3.0%) due to advanced associated congenital heart disease. There were 4 late deaths (4.0%) and 2 late cardiac transplants (2.0%). Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at 1 and 10 years was 94% and 85% for atrial arrhythmias, and 85% and 68% for ventricular arrhythmias, respectively. Conclusions. Successful surgical therapy for atrial arrhythmias can be performed safely with a high freedom from recurrence rate in patients with and without associated congenital heart disease. Surgical ablation for ventricular arrhythmias is less predictive. Complexity of the underlying congenital heart disease and hemodynamic status may contribute to potential arrhythmia recurrence or new onset arrhythmia manifestation. (Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:857– 68) © 2008 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons T ablative therapy. The purpose of this article is to update [10] our long-term results of arrhythmia operations and review arrhythmia mechanisms and the principles of corrective ablative therapy. he introduction and development of arrhythmia surgery in patients with and without associated congenital heart disease has enabled clinicians to treat disabling arrhythmias not amenable to transcatheter ablative techniques [1– 8]. Because decreased cardiac output attributable to arrhythmias is compounded by coexisting unrepaired or residual congenital defects, the initial or reoperative repair must include both physiologicanatomic correction as well as electrophysiologic correction if optimal long-term outcome and beneficial quality of life are to be achieved [9]. Mechanisms underlying the various atrial and ventricular arrhythmias have been incompletely understood by congenital heart surgeons owing to case-mix variability in many congenital heart surgery centers. This leads to an incomplete understanding of what is accomplished by Accepted for publication April 23, 2008. Presented at the Forty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Jan 28 –30, 2008. Address correspondence to Dr Mavroudis, Division of CardiovascularThoracic Surgery-M/C #22, Children’s Memorial Hospital, 2300 Children’s Plaza, Chicago, IL 60614; e-mail: [email protected]. © 2008 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Published by Elsevier Inc Material and Methods Between 1987 and 2007, 211 patients had surgical intervention for arrhythmia. Of these, 111 had Fontan conversions reported previously [11–13] and are not included in this series. Of the remaining 100 patients, 89 underwent arrhythmia intervention in association with congenital heart repairs and 11 (ⱕ 18 years of age) had intervention without associated congenital heart repair. Mean age at operation was 15.9 ⫾ 12.5 years (range, 7 days– 48 years); 7 were infants (mean age, 23 ⫾ 16 days). Resternotomy was done in 65 of 100 patients (65%). Two functional ventricles were present in 67. Arrhythmias included macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia in 45, atrial fibrillation in 11, atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in 6, concealed and manifest accessory connections in 19, focal (automatic) atrial tachycardia in 6, and ventricular tachycardia in 13. Some patients 0003-4975/08/$34.00 doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.087 PEDIATRIC CARDIAC The Annals of Thoracic Surgery CME Program is located online at http://cme.ctsnetjournals.org. To take the CME activity related to this article, you must have either an STS member or an individual non-member subscription to the journal. PEDIATRIC CARDIAC Single-ventricle variants Heterotaxy/unbalanced AVC Pts, No. 6 Single LV 7 Single RV 9 TGA–Prior atrial repair 1 Prior valved conduit repair 9 Initial valve or conduit placement - Prior repair 9 2 Initial repair 1 Left modified Blalock-Taussig shunt ⫹ pulmonary artery arterioplasty Initial Fontan–5 patients (⫹ PM [4] or PM lead [1]) TV plasty ⫹ 1½ repair ⫹ PM revision Initial Fontan–6 patients (⫹ PM [5] or PM lead [1]) TVR post-Fontan ⫹ PM revision TVR post-Fontan ⫹ PM revision ⫹ incomplete right maze due to retained lateral tunnel; 6th intracardiac procedure Initial Fontan–7 patients (⫹ PM [5] or PM lead [1]) Arterial switch operation with Mustard takedown ⫹ PM revision PA-VSD, conduit replacement ⫹ PM (4) TGA, conduit replacement CCTGA, conduit replacement Perioperative Events None AT recurrence 1 month post-Fontan ¡ overdrive pacing, amiodarone in patient with dextrocardia, right-dominant unbalanced AVC Fontan takedown 3 days post-op in heterotaxy patient None None None Late Postoperative Events BDCPA, pulmonary venous stenosis repair in heterotaxy patient AT recurrence with cardioversion 4.5 years post-op None Late death 11 months post-Fontan Fontan (Uhl anomaly) None Late death from ventricular failure AT recurrences 3.5 and 5 years post-TVR TVR 4.7 years post-Fontan–1 patient VAD 1 day post-op ¡ death 2 weeks post-op None None None Aortic atresia/stenosis, conduit replacement (2) Truncus arteriosus, conduit replacement ⫹ truncal valve replacement Tetralogy of Fallot, prior ventriculotomy; RV-PA conduit placement (2) or PVR (2) None None VT 9 months post-op ¡ AICD–1 patient None TVR 6 months post-op ¡ VAD ¡ transplant 7 months post-op None None None None PA-IVS, prior valvotomy; RV-PA conduit placement ⫹ TV annuloplasty Complete AVC; TVR ⫹ mitral valvuloplasty Tricuspid stenosis, post-valvuloplasty; TVR Tricuspid regurgitation in CCTGA, post-AICD for VT; TVR Residual aortic stenosis/insufficiency, residual VSD, prior ventriculotomy; TV plasty ⫹ VSD patch ⫹ AV replacement TV annuloplasty (Ebstein) ⫹ pulmonary valvotomy Residual VSD (of multiple) ⫹ pulmonary artery arterioplasty Partial AVC None None None None None None None Stroke 2 months post-op None None None None None None None None Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:857– 68 VSD - Prior repair Congenital Heart Disease Surgery MAVROUDIS ET AL ARRHYTHMIA SURGERY Diagnosis 858 Table 1. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Modified Right Atrial Maze Procedure for Macro-Reentrant Atrial Tachycardia 45 TOTAL 859 had more than one arrhythmia and were treated with techniques appropriate for the particular substrates. Clinical features of all patients are noted in Tables 1 to 6. All patients had symptoms that were mostly related to recurrent arrhythmias and included congestive heart failure, syncope, palpitations, and patients in unstable hemodynamic compromise. Ten patients had prior transcatheter ablation procedures that failed for a variety of reasons, including lack of adequate venous access, hemodynamic instability during arrhythmia, complexity of anatomy and cyanotic heart disease, or emergence of new arrhythmias after successful ablation of the initial arrhythmia. In 54 patients preoperative electrophysiology studies were performed to determine the tachycardia mechanism and anatomic foci. Excluded were neonates with focal atrial tachycardia or Ebstein anomaly and patients with hemodynamic compromise or atrial fibrillation. Infrequently, arrhythmia was not inducible in the catheterization laboratory, in which case intraoperative mapping was attempted. Intraoperative epicardial mapping was performed in 51 patients; those with atrial fibrillation or hemodynamic instability during arrhythmia were excluded. Mapping was performed early in the series with a handheld probe or a multiple-array epicardial sock; it is now performed with 2 decapolar probes. Standard surgical techniques for arrhythmia ablation were used, which included resection, isolation, and cryoablation of affected atrial or ventricular tissue [1– 8]. Cryoablation in the early part of our experience was performed using 3-, 5-, and 15-mm circular probes (Frigitronics, Cooper Surgical Inc, Shelton CT) at ⫺60°C for 90-second lesions. Since 2003, we have used malleable linear CryoCath probes to place 60-second lesions at ⫺150°C (CryoCath Technologies Inc, Montréal, Québec, Canada). Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia (Fig 1) was ablated by either an isthmus ablation (early in the series) or a standard or modified right atrial maze procedure that was specific for the anatomic substrates: patients with 1 ventricle (primary Fontan) [13] or patients with 2 ventricles [7]. Ablative therapy principles for anatomically complex patients with macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia are based on the normal pattern of atrial electrical impulses and the paths that these impulses take around natural or created obstacles to stimulate the atrioventricular node. Macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia circuits require an area of slow conduction together with an area of unidirectional block. Potential anatomic obstacles in the right atrium include the orifices of the venae cavae, orifice of the hepatic vein, the coronary sinus, anomalous pulmonary venous return, the atrial septal defect/patch or fossa ovalis, juxtaposition of the atrial appendages, and the tricuspid annulus. Correspondingly, there are anatomic barriers (orifices) in the left atrium as well: the pulmonary veins, a left-sided superior vena cava, anomalous systemic venous return, or the mitral annulus. In addition, scar from jet lesions or prior incisions, or electrically inert tissue due to stretch or fibrosis, may act as areas of slow conduction or unidirectional block. Areas between anatomic obstacles create an isthmus of tissue that serves PEDIATRIC CARDIAC AICD ⫽ automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator; AT ⫽ macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia; AV ⫽ aortic valve; AVC ⫽ atrioventricular canal; BDCPA ⫽ bidirectional cavopulmonary artery anastomosis; CCTGA ⫽ congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries; LV ⫽ left ventricle; PA-IVS ⫽ pulmonary atresia-intact ventricular septum; PA-VSD ⫽ pulmonary atresia-ventricular septal defect; PM ⫽ pacemaker; PVR ⫽ pulmonary valve replacement; RFA ⫽ radiofrequency ablation; RV ⫽ right ventricle; RV-PA ⫽ right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery; TGA ⫽ transposition of the great arteries; TV ⫽ tricuspid valve; TVR ⫽ tricuspid valve replacement; VAD ⫽ ventricular assist device; VSD ⫽ ventricular septal defect; VT ⫽ ventricular tachycardia. 1 operative mortality 1 No structural heart disease Diagnosis Table 1. (Continued) Pts, No. None Congenital Heart Disease Surgery None Perioperative Events PM 3 years post-op for bradycardia; AT at 5 years ¡ transcatheter RFA atrioventricular node 3 Recurrences; 1 new onset VT 2 Late deaths; 1 late transplant MAVROUDIS ET AL ARRHYTHMIA SURGERY Late Postoperative Events Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:857– 68 860 MAVROUDIS ET AL ARRHYTHMIA SURGERY Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:857– 68 Table 2. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Cox-Maze IIIa Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis PEDIATRIC CARDIAC Single ventricle variants Heterotaxy Single LV Single RV Prior repair/palliation Initial repair Totals a Patients, No. 1 2 1 5 2 Congenital Heart Disease Surgery Mitral valvuloplasty, 1½ ventricular repair, ascending aorta aneurysm repair (post-Konno) ⫹ PM revision Initial Fontan at 9 years ⫹ initial PM PA-IVS post-RVOT patch; TVR, 1½ ventricular repair, RV-PA conduit ⫹ PM lead only a Multisite AT PM (removal AICD) Aortic stenosis post-AV/MV replacement, AICD; Konno ⫹ AV/ MV replacement ⫹ LV aneurysm repair Complete AVC; mitral valvuloplasty Partial AVC; mitral valvuloplasty ⫹ redo patch repair ⫹ initial PM Mitral regurgitation post-valvuloplasty; MV replacement PS-TS; takedown Glenn ⫹ PVR ⫹ RVOT patch ⫹ PM Sinus venosus ASD ⫹ PAPVC repair ⫹ initial PM Mitral valvuloplasty, cardiomyopathy 11 Perioperative Events Late Postoperative Events None None None None None None Death 10 days post-op None ORT 10 months post-op PM 10 days post-op None None None None None None None AT episodes 1, 2.5, and 2.8 years post-op None None None 1 operative death 1 new-onset ORT; 1 new-onset AT Pulmonary isolation by epicardial cryoablation without cardiopulmonary bypass because of hemodynamic instability. AICD ⫽ automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator; ASD ⫽ atrial septal defect; AT ⫽ macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia; AV ⫽ aortic valve; AVC ⫽ atrioventricular canal; LV ⫽ left ventricle; MV ⫽ mitral valve; ORT ⫽ orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia; PA-IVS ⫽ pulmonary atresia-intact ventricular septum; PAPVC ⫽ partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection; PM ⫽ pacemaker; PS-TS ⫽ pulmonary stenosis-tricuspid stenosis; PVR ⫽ pulmonary valve replacement; RV ⫽ right ventricle; RV-PA ⫽ right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery; RVOT ⫽ right ventricular outflow tract; TVR ⫽ tricuspid valve replacement. as a natural target for the interruption of a macroreentrant circuit. The goal of cryoablation therapy is to transform an area of slow conduction to an area of no conduction by interrupting the electrical corridor (isthmus) between adjacent obstacles or scars, while preserving sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodal function. A patient with a separate hepatic vein entry into the right atrium, for example, will require cryoablation lesions to connect the inferior vena cava os to the coronary sinus os, the hepatic vein os to the coronary sinus os, and the hepatic vein os to the tricuspid annulus; remaining lesions are standard for the right-sided maze procedure. These principles (Fig 1A) can be applied to all other natural and created obstacles; it is important to recognize that these principles do not apply to focal atrial tachycardias, which arise from discrete foci. Atrial fibrillation was treated by left atrial Cox-maze III procedure in addition to modified or standard right atrial maze, depending on the anatomic substrate [7, 8], using a combination of incisions and cryoablation lesions. Selective cryoablation modification of the atrioventricular nodal slow pathway in the region of the coronary sinus was used to treat atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (Fig 2). Accessory connections (Fig 3A and B) were divided by both epicardial and endocardial resection techniques. Focal (automatic) atrial tachycardia (Fig 4) was treated by isolation, resection, or cryoablation of the affected atrial tissue [3]. Ventricular tachycardia was ablated by a combination of endocardial resection and cryoablation, or epicardial resection and cryoablation based on the identified pathology [5]. Postoperative electrophysiology studies were performed in all surviving patients before hospital discharge except those with atrial fibrillation or focal atrial tachycardia. Postoperative pacing protocols for atrial tachycardia included atrial incremental pacing, and single, double, and triple atrial extrastimulation in a minimum paced cycle length of 200 milliseconds. Patients with ventricular tachycardia underwent provocative stimulation consisting of single, double, and triple extrastimulation at two paced cycle lengths from both the right ventricular apex and outflow tract. Postoperative studies were performed in baseline state and during isoproterenol infusion. Consistent with our previously reported protocols, patients with atrial arrhythmias (other than atrial fibril- Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:857– 68 MAVROUDIS ET AL ARRHYTHMIA SURGERY 861 Diagnosis Single ventricle variants Heterotaxy Single LV Ebstein TGA – Prior arterial switch Double outlet right ventricle – Prior pulmonary artery band Initial repair No structural heart disease Totals # Pts Congenital Heart Disease Surgery 2 Initial Fontan ⫹ initial PM ⫹ maze for AT Initial Fontan 3 TV plasty ⫹ 1½ ventricular repair Ebstein repair (with PA-IVS) 1 Perioperative Events None Postoperative Arrhythmia Occurrence ORT ⱕ 1 year ¡ transplant 3 years post-op WPW recurrence 3 years post-op Ebstein repair ⫹ VSD repair Repeat surgical ablation 4 days post-op None Intraoperative death in 11-day-old None 1 ASD secundum repair MV replacement ⫹ PM revision None None AT 18 months post-op, successful transcatheter RFA 5 years post-op None None 1 Intraventricular tunnel repair None None 3 Partial AVC repair ASD secundum patch repair Scimitar syndrome repair 8 Repair catheter aortic perforation ⫹ limited epicardial mapping and epicardial cryoablation No associated surgery (7) None None Repeat surgical ablation 8 days post-op None None None LV aneurysm repair 5 months post-op Recurrence 3 months post-op – left accessory connection Repeat surgical ablation 4 days post-op – 1 patient None – 6 patients None 19 1 operative death AT 3 years post-op Repeat surgical ablation 9 months post-op – 1 patient PM 3.5 years post-op – 1 patient 4 recurrences; 2 new-onset AT 1 late transplant ASD ⫽ atrial septal defect; AT ⫽ macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia; AVC ⫽ atrioventricular canal; LV ⫽ left ventricle; MV ⫽ mitral valve; ORT ⫽ orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia; PM ⫽ pacemaker; PA-IVS ⫽ pulmonary atresia-intact ventricular septum; RFA ⫽ radiofrequency ablation; TGA ⫽ transposition of the great arteries; TV ⫽ tricuspid valve; VSD ⫽ ventricular septal defect; WPW ⫽ Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. lation) received -blockade for 3 months postoperatively; patients with atrial fibrillation received amiodarone therapy for 3 months postoperatively. Patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia postoperatively received implantable defibrillators. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed at routine visits by review of symptoms, comprehensive electrocardiographic monitoring, and interrogation of pacemakers or implanted defibrillators. Consulting statistician constructed freedom from arrhythmia recurrence graphs using the life-test procedure product-limit survival estimates. Institutional Review Board approval for this retrospective study was obtained, and the need for informed consent was waived. Results Surgical Outcome Three patients died, for an operative mortality of 3% (Tables 1, 2, and 3); two deaths have been previously reported [10]. The third occurred in a 36-year-old man with an unoperated on univentricular heart and incessant atrial fibrillation causing severe decompensation. He underwent epicardial cryoablative pulmonary venous isolation because of reticence to perform a Cox-maze procedure, which would require cardiopulmonary bypass. He had rapid recurrence and died 10 days after the operation. Late deaths occurred in 4 patients (see Tables 1, 4); one death that occurred after attempted takedown of a Mustard procedure was previously reported [10]. Operations were performed as emergencies in 2 surviving patients who had acute hemodynamic decompensation. One patient without congenital heart disease presented with cardiogenic shock due to focal atrial tachycardia and was brought to the operating for an emergency ventricular assist device. He underwent electrophysiologic mapping of the right atrium and resection of the arrhythmogenic focus in the right atrial appendage PEDIATRIC CARDIAC Table 3. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgical Ablation for Accessory Connection-Mediated Tachycardia 862 MAVROUDIS ET AL ARRHYTHMIA SURGERY Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:857– 68 Table 4. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Pathway Modification for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia PEDIATRIC CARDIAC Patients, No Diagnosis Single-ventricle variants Heterotaxy 3 TGA—prior atrial repair 2 PS-IVS—prior valvuloplasty 1 Totals 6 Congenital Heart Disease Surgery Initial Fontan ⫹ PM lead only Initial Fontan ⫹ initial PM Pulmonary venous stenosis repair ⫹ mitral valvuloplasty ⫹ initial PM (post-BDCPA, TAPVC repair) Re-do atrial baffle ⫹ PM Arterial switch operation with Senning takedown ⫹ PM RV-PA conduit placement ⫹ TV ring annuloplasty Perioperative Events Late Postoperative Events None None None None None Pulmonary venous stenosis ¡ death 2 months post-op None None Arterial switch elsewhere 11 months post-op ¡ death None None None 2 late deaths BDCPA ⫽ bidirectional cavopulmonary artery anastomosis; PM ⫽ pacemaker; PA-IVS ⫽ pulmonary atresia-intact ventricular septum; RV-PA ⫽ right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery; TAPVC ⫽ total anomalous pulmonary venous connection; TGA ⫽ transposition of the great arteries; TV ⫽ tricuspid valve. curred in 17 of 100 (17%) patients. Three patients with accessory connections who were operated on early in our series (1989 to 1991), before transcatheter ablation procedures were standard therapy, underwent a second surgical ablation postoperatively at 4, 4, and 8 days, respectively, because of recurrent tachycardia; 1 patient had late recurrence. A fourth patient, also early in the series, underwent surgical ablation 9 months postoperatively because of late recurrence of accessory connectionmediated tachycardia. Additional patients underwent early reoperation for ventricular assist device placement, Fontan takedown, control of bleeding, thoracic duct liga- with conversion to normal sinus rhythm. No assist device was implanted; gradual normalization of ventricular function ensued without arrhythmia recurrence. Another patient with a left-sided accessory connection and aortic perforation during a transseptal procedure before catheter ablation had limited epicardial mapping with epicardial cryoablation. Accessory connection function later recurred and was treated with -blocking medication. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days (range, 4 to 278 days). Early postoperative surgical complications requiring return to the operating room oc- Table 5. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Lesion Ablation/Resection for Focal Atrial Tachycardia Diagnosis Single ventricle variants Single RV Initial Repair Patients, No. Congenital Heart Disease Surgery Perioperative Events 1 Norwood None 4 Tetralogy of Fallot; repair with subvalvar RVOT patch ⫹ cryoablation of focal atrial tachycardia site ⫹ isthmus cryoablation for AT Multiple VSD ASD secundum patch repair None No structural heart disease 1 TOTALS 6 Patent foramen ovale primary closure None, in patient with associated atrial fibrillation, AT ASD ⫽ atrial septal defect; AT ⫽ macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia; pacemaker; RFA ⫽ radiofrequency ablation; RV ⫽ right ventricle; artery connection; VSD ⫽ ventricular septal defect. None None None Focal atrial tachycardia recurred immediate post-op period ¡ transcatheter RFA Late Postoperative Events BDCPA; extracardiac TCPC ⫹ PM lead; bradycardia ¡ PM 7.3 years post-op None None Recurrence at 5.75 years post-op ¡ metoprolol None Recurrence 10 months post-op ¡ dofetilide; transcatheter RFA ⫻2 at left pulmonary veins 2 years post-op 2 recurrences BDCPA ⫽ bidirectional cavopulmonary artery anastomosis; PM ⫽ RVOT ⫽ right ventricular outflow tract; TCPC ⫽ total cavopulmonary Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:857– 68 MAVROUDIS ET AL ARRHYTHMIA SURGERY 863 Diagnosis Tetralogy of Fallot Postrepair, w/ventriculotomy Patients, No. 2 ASD secundum - Postrepair, with severe RV cardiomyopathy (Uhl anomaly) 1 Initial repair 3 No structural heart disease TOTALS Perioperative Events Late Postoperative Events 6 Postrepair, no ventriculotomy TGA, VSD-LVOTO post-Rastelli Congenital Heart Disease Surgery RV-PA conduit replacement (2) RV-PA conduit replacement and PM removal PVR (initial) ⫹ PM revision PVR ⫹ RV aneurysm repair ⫹ AICD revision RVOT obstruction resection ⫹ patch augmentation RV-PA conduit replacement ⫹ maze ⫹ PM revision RV-PA conduit replacement ⫹ maze ⫹ PM removal for planned later AICD TV ring annuloplasty ⫹ RV aneurysm repair ⫹ 1½ ventricular repair ⫹ right maze procedure for AT ⫹ AICD RV-PA conduit for absent pulmonary valve VSD patch repair VSD patch repair 1 13 None None Inducible VT ¡ AICD 7 days post-op AICD 3 years post-op None New-onset AT 4 years post-op None New-onset AT 10 years post-op None None None None Inducible VT¡AICD 8 days post-op Recurrent VT; dilated cardiomyopathy ¡ transplant candidate None Recurrent VT 4 months post-op; VT catheter ablation 1.8 years post-op; subsequent recurrent VT - Ligation thoracic duct 1 mo post-op None None None None - New onset AT 1.8 years post-op ¡ successful transcatheter RFA None 2 recurrences; 3 new-onset AT None AICD ⫽ automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator; ASD ⫽ atrial septal defect; AT ⫽ macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia; PM ⫽ pacemaker; PVR ⫽ pulmonary valve replacement; RFA ⫽ radiofrequency ablation; RV ⫽ right ventricle; RV-PA ⫽ right ventricle-topulmonary artery; RVOT ⫽ right ventricular outflow tract; TGA, VSD-LVOTO ⫽ transposition of the great arteries ⫹ ventricular septal defect ⫹ left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; TV ⫽ tricuspid valve; VSD ⫽ ventricular septal defect. tion, sternal instability, delayed sternal closure, and device placement in 6 or revision in 2. Two patients required cardiac transplantation late after the operation (Tables 1, 3). A third patient is under consideration for cardiac transplantation (Table 6). Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence, as determined by documented persistent clinical recurrence more than 3 months postoperatively [14], was 94% and 85% for atrial arrhythmias at 1 and 10 years, respectively, representing nine recurrences in 87 patients (10%; 3 macro-reentrant atrial, 4 accessory connection-mediated, and 2 focal atrial tachycardias), and 85% and 68% for ventricular arrhythmias at 1 and 10 years, respectively, representing two recurrences in 13 patients (15%; Fig 5). New-onset tachycardias were not included in recur- rence calculations. They were present at follow-up in an additional 8 patients (Tables 1 to 6). Comment In our previous report of 29 patients [10], we demonstrated that arrhythmia surgical interventions in association with initial and reoperative congenital heart repairs are effective, efficacious, and in some cases, life saving. The surgical arrhythmia techniques for accessory connections, focal atrial tachycardia, and atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia have been well described in patients with structurally normal hearts [1–3] and in patients with 2 ventricles and simple associated heart defects such as atrial septal defect [4 – 8]. This series PEDIATRIC CARDIAC Table 6. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endocardial Resection/Cryoablation for Ventricular Tachycardia 864 MAVROUDIS ET AL ARRHYTHMIA SURGERY Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:857– 68 PEDIATRIC CARDIAC Fig 1. (A) Cavotricuspid-isthmus dependent macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia. As depicted, the “playing field” is the right atrium, where a premature atrial contraction might encounter block in the atrial septum (broken line) and proceed in an alternate route down the right atrial free wall. The wave front may encounter an area of slow conduction (squiggly arrow), in this case between the inferior vena cava, tricuspid valve, and the coronary sinus (CS). The delay encountered as the wave front traverses the area of slow conduction allows the atrial septum to recover conduction. The wave front exits the isthmus and proceeds up the atrial septum. Interruption of this circuit is targeted at the inferior isthmus due to the clearly identified landmarks in proximity. (AV ⫽ atrioventricular; SA ⫽ sinoatrial.) (B) Schematic representation of the possible lines of ablation to treat macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia in the presence of various atrial anomalies associated with complex congenital heart disease. These atrial anomalies do not generally occur together, and the demonstrated lines of block are not meant to be incorporated into every operation. They are depicted only as guidelines on which to base an ablative operation when unusual anatomic obstacles are encountered in the performance of the maze procedure. (avn ⫽ atrioventricular node; CS ⫽ coronary sinus; FO ⫽ foramen ovale; HV ⫽ hepatic vein; IVC ⫽ inferior vena cava; LAA ⫽ left atrial appendage; LSVC ⫽ left superior vena cava; MV ⫽ mitral valve; PV ⫽ pulmonary veins; RAA ⫽ right atrial appendage; RSVC ⫽ right superior vena cava; TAPVR ⫽ total anomalous pulmonary venous return; TV ⫽ tricuspid valve.) describes our attempt to apply ablative principles developed in structurally normal hearts to complex forms of congenital heart disease and critically ill patients. Our arrhythmia recurrence rate for atrial tachycardia in congenital heart patients (Fig 5) compares favorably with other reports [15–17]. The recurrences can be explained by anatomic, electrophysiologic, and hemodynamic variability that present significant challenges to the principles of arrhythmia ablation. Important anatomic variability that impacted arrhythmia ablative techniques included bilateral venae cavae, separate atrial entry of the hepatic veins, anomalous pulmonary venous return, absence of the coronary sinus, common atrioventricular valve, juxtaposed atrial appendages, and dilated coronary sinuses. These variations tended to occur in diagnoses known to have anomalous conduction systems and poorly defined accessory connections such as crisscross heart with single ventricle and straddling atrioventricular valve, single ventricle with heterotaxy, and single ventricle with l-transposition. Most of our recurrences tended to be in patients with residual accessory connections and macro-reentrant atrial tachycardias in whom preoperative and improvised intraoperative electrophysiologic studies presented various challenges. It was not uncommon to treat a patient for one arrhythmia only for another and unrelated ar- rhythmia to occur using a different pathway. Hemodynamic variability, preoperative ventricular dysfunction, and hesitation to prolong the cross-clamp time for complex intracardiac procedures led us to perform an abbreviated arrhythmia operation in 3 patients whose arrhythmias recurred. Whether more aggressive operative solutions would have resulted in better outcomes or given rise to adverse events must be left to speculation. The outcomes do underline the necessity of performing established arrhythmia operations; abbreviated procedures are likely to result in recurrence. The characteristics of our patients with macroreentrant atrial tachycardia include those with prior operations and atrial enlargement due to hemodynamic aberrations (Table 1). The largest category in this group is patients with a univentricular heart who underwent first-time Fontan operations. Other categories include patients who had reoperation for tetralogy of Fallot/ double-outlet right ventricle or conduit replacement for right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery continuity, which a large multicenter study showed was related to late arrhythmia development and late sudden death [18]. Risk factors associated with these conditions establish the substrate for macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia propagated by an area of slow conduction, which could be the coronary sinus-inferior vena cava isthmus or around a