Download Comparative Computer Results of a New Complementary Pivot

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Mathematical economics wikipedia , lookup

Artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Exact cover wikipedia , lookup

Knapsack problem wikipedia , lookup

Computational fluid dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Algorithm wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical computer science wikipedia , lookup

Dirac bracket wikipedia , lookup

Inverse problem wikipedia , lookup

Lateral computing wikipedia , lookup

Travelling salesman problem wikipedia , lookup

Simplex algorithm wikipedia , lookup

Genetic algorithm wikipedia , lookup

Multi-objective optimization wikipedia , lookup

Multiple-criteria decision analysis wikipedia , lookup

Computational electromagnetics wikipedia , lookup

Computational complexity theory wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical optimization wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Comparative Computer Results of a New Complementary Pivot Algorithm for Solving
Equality Constrained Optimization Problems, Mathematical Programming, 18(2), 168-185,
1980.
This paper reports the development of a new algorithm for solving the general constrained
optimization problem (that of optimizing an objective function subject to both equality and
inequality constraints). The approach is based on the complementary pivoting algorithms that
have been developed to solve certain classes of fixed-point problems. The specific approach is to
use the equality constraints to solve for some of the variables in terms of the remaining ones,
thus enabling one to eliminate the quality constraints altogether. The result, under certain
circumstances, is an optimization problem that can be transformed into a fixed-point problem in
such a way that a complementary pivoting code may be used to search for a fixed point.
Seventeen test problems have been solved by this method and the results compared against those
obtained from GRG (Generalized Reduced Gradient method). The results of these tests indicate
that the fixed-point approach is robust (all seventeen problems were solved by this method
whereas GRG solved sixteen). As to the computer times, the fixed-point code proved to be as
fast or faster than GRG on the lower-dimensional problems; however, as the dimension
increased, the trend reversed and on a forty-dimensional problem, GRG was approximately
eleven times faster. The conclusion from these tests is that when the dimension of the original
problem can be reduced sufficiently by the equality constraints, the fixed-point approach appears
to be more effective than GRG.